Rampage
Fresno City College Volume CXXII, Edition 2
February 15, 2012
District Lacks Plan
photos by
Paul Schlesinger & Abel Cortez
RAMPAGE EDITORIAL
FRESNO CITY COLLEGE WARNED BY ACCREDITING BODY By Alex Tavlian Rampage Reporter
For the second time in Fresno City College’s 101-year history, the college along with Reedley College received a warning from the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges last Wednesday, failing its accreditation. The warning, the first and lowest of three sanctions assigned by the commission, given to Fresno City College and Reedley College had very little to do with
the colleges’current operations and more about the relationship with their governing body, the State Center Community College District. Among the litany of recommendations and standards that FCC had to reach during its accreditation evaluation, the college received only one college-specific recommendation: that it add an Academic Freedom statement, or a statement admitting that students and faculty have the freedom to
express views not held by others in the classroom, to its course catalog. Despite the Academic Freedom statement requirement, the commission’s 60-page evaluation report is underscored by one recommendation, entitled District Recommendation #1: “In order for the colleges and district to fully meet the intent of the previous recommendation [from the 2005 report], the State Center Community College Dis-
trict (SCCCD) must engage in continuous, timely and deliberate dialogue with all District stakeholders to coordinate long term planning and examine the impact of the planned institutions. This includes creating, developing and aligning district and college plans and planning processes in the following areas: district strategic plan, facilities, technology, organizational reporting relationship of
See WARNING on page 3
Interim Positions a Concern In Accreditation Report
By Tomas Kassahun Rampage Reporter
The frequent change of leadership in recent years has left a glaring hole in the 2012 evaluation report of the State Center Community College District. The report, provided by The Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges, found that the administrative changes have brought about instability. Although the district was commended for its integrated planning efforts, the Accrediting team
NEWS
The report adds that, “Interviews at both the district office and col“Changes in senior leadership at the district and lege revealed that the future plans college have resulted in uneven and ineffective for college and center expansion, starts and stops in district and college integrated enrollment management and the effects of the considered changes planning.” were misunderstood as a result -Fresno City College of either incomplete or erroneous Accreditation Report information. Comments about frequent senior management changes and instability, until recently, were noted as contributing factors.” and ineffective starts and stops concluded that “changes in senior According to Chancellor Deboin district and college integrated leadership at the district and colplanning.” See Interims on page 2 lege have resulted in uneven
Summer Schools Here to Stay
See Page 5
THERAMPAGEONLINE.COM
ENTERTAINMENT
VIEWS
FCC Gala Performace
African American Sterotypes
See Page 8
See Page 11
Last week’s report from the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges reveals serious problems within the State Center Community College District. The problem is centered on both the mechanism and processes for communication. Presently, our district lacks a cohesive plan for communication and cooperation between itself and the colleges and centers it governs. This is a major concern because communication is essential to the success of any institution, especially a multi-campus district. There is a confusion that is palpable among students, faculty and staff that must be acknowledged and dealt with. For us students, it is a concern that our college was issued a warning by the accrediting team that visited last October. Among the areas of concern was the gap in communication, the lack of a clear understanding in the way things should work. This should not have come as a shock to the district because the chair of the accreditation team had mentioned this issue in his closing statements. He had said he feared that the college was losing its momentum and that his team noted gaps in communication. We know the gaps. Most students enrolled in F.C.C. know the confusion expressed by faculty members regarding the district’s add/drop policies. At the start of the semester, instructors are not able to add students over the cap. Students who sat on the floor of lecture halls, hoping to be added to rosters can describe the torture and uncertainty. Faculty after faculty repeated that they were under stringent rules and couldn’t add anyone. But just as we were getting used to this rule, the district did a complete turn and told instructors they could add as many as they wanted. And after the third of week of classes? Yet another example of the breakdown in communication
See Communication page 13
SPORTS
Baseball: Shad Wallace
See Page 15