Rampage Spring I3 2012

Page 1

Rampage

Fresno City College Volume CXXII, Edition 3

February 29, 2012

SCCCD Addresses Poor Communication

Jothany Blackwood Dean of FPCA

By Jordan Russell Rampage Reporter Fresno City College is already taking steps to address the concerns raised in the ACCJC’s report regarding the institution’s communication standard. “We have a task force that’s developing a communication plan that will be implemented in the fall,” said FCC Interim President Tony Cantu. The Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior colleges found that Fresno City College is lacking in its level of campus-wide communication.

Tony Cantu Interim FCC President

“Communication, in the form of information sharing, about planning and college priorities, has not been ongoing, systematic, and transparent,” according to the ACCJC’s evaluation report. “Perceptions from college constituencies indicate that communication may be available, but internal constituencies may choose not to engage fully in college discussion.” In response to these findings, the ACCJC recommended that “the college complete its audit of communication instruments, and develop and implement clear and unambiguous means for commu-

Rick Santos SPC Committee Member

nicating with internal and external constituents” in order to improve the college’s Institutional effectiveness. Prior to the ACCJC evaluation team’s visit, FCC had addressed the issue of communication in its self-study. In regards to the school’s mission and effectiveness, the self-study noted, “Campus communication is a weakness that is evidenced throughout the standards.” This report also noted that although the college has made progress in several areas, “many individuals on campus are unaware of it” because current

Deborah Blue SCCCD Chancellor

communication methods are “inconsistent and information is often difficult to locate.” The ACCJC also found that the communication is lacking at the district level. In both the 2005 and 2011 evaluation visits, the overarching district recommendation is that, “the State Center Community College District (SCCCD) must engage in continuous, timely, and deliberative dialogue with all District stakeholders to coordinate long term planning and examine the impact of the planned increase in the number of colleges and the future roles of the centers on the existing

institutions.” Rick Santos, member of Academic Senate’s Participatory Governance Committee and former Academic Senate President, explained the meaning of this recommendation. “What this means to me,” he said, “is that we do not have a fully developed communication system between the college and District that allows for full participation in the governance process that aids strategic planning.” According to Santos, this governance process is the result of California Assembly Bill 1725,

See Communication on page 2

Strategic planning committee Looks to remedy accreditation warning By Alex Tavlian Rampage Reporter

The District Strategic Planning Committee (known as the DSPC) of the State Center Community College District, charged recommending the district’s strategic plan to the Board of Trustees, met for the first time on Friday and set out its calendar for the rest of the 2011-2012 school year. Currently, the DSPC, which replaces the strategic planning workgroup, is in its second of six phases, which focuses on conducting a charrette -- a collaborative session in which a group of designers drafts a solution to a design problem -- with the district’s

NEWS

Study Abroad

See Page 3

various stakeholders on March 1. The charrette will review the expiring strategic plan which was submitted and approved in 2008 as well as evaluate the various goals and objectives of the soon-to-be developed strategic plan. On March 2, committee members will meet with the College Brain Trust, a private educational consulting firm, to review the input of the district’s various constituencies from the charrette process. Throughout their meeting on Friday, members of the strategic planning committee focused on maintaining open communications with their constituents, a concern raised by the ACCJC evaluation team.

“Representatives are the main communication vehicles between your constituencies,” Jothany Blackwood, de facto committee chair and Dean of Fine, Perform-

Tom Mester recommended that the committee members report all correspondence with their constituents as “evidence for accreditation.”

“Representatives are the main communication vehicles between your constituencies.” Jothany Blackwood

ing and Communication Arts, said. Committee member and interim Dean of Instruction and Technology at Willow International,

The DSPC meeting is a step by Fresno City College and SCCCD to start the process to address the concerns addressed by the evalu-

THERAMPAGEONLINE.COM

ENTERTAINMENT

VIEWS

Rogue Festival

Derogatory Names

See Page 5

See Page 7

ation team in its recently-released report. Fresno City College received a second accreditation warning from the Accrediting Commission for Junior and Community Colleges in early February. Both Fresno City College and Reedley College received warnings related to failures in the district’s integrated planning. During an editorial board meeting with The Rampage on Feb. 10, Chancellor Deborah Blue said that the district’s first step in addressing the commission’s warning is to complete its update of the district strategic plan. The move to open up communications with constituents is

See Strategic Planning on page 4

SPORTS Softball

See Page 12


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.