Byron Shire Echo – Issue 30.33 – 27/01/2016 by Echo Publications

Comment

netdaily.net.au

North Coast news daily:

A PM ritual: kowtowing to the Yanks

Volume 30 #33

January 27, 2016

Science and stupidity Australia’s chief scientist, Professor Ian Chubb, finished up his five-year stint last Friday. The position chiefly involves pushing against the tide of ignorance exhibited by successive federal governments about the importance of science. Chubb’s parting shot was releasing reports (http://bit.ly/ sciencerocksOK) showing that science contributes $330 billion to Australia’s economy annually and scientific advances over the past 30 years are helping to keep about ten per cent of the workforce – or one million Australians – in jobs. The reports might have some impact on the current government now we have a minister for science rather than a PM for burning witches. The minister is Christopher Pyne, a lawyer who might have some acquaintance with science via his father, who was a prominent ophthalmic surgeon. By comparison, Canada’s science minister, Kirsty Duncan, taught meteorology, climatology and climate change for seven years at the University of Windsor in Ontario. The value of science should be in the category of the bleeding obvious. It has been popularised in Australia since the early sixties by the likes of American physicist Julius Sumner Miller and more recently by Dr Karl and Adam Spencer. It is simply an extension of human curiosity and ingenuity. The first scientists were those who, for example, figured out how to chip flint to make tools or use fire to cook food. It is the bedrock of all our technology; it enables creationists to go on television and deride the discoveries they do not wish to understand. Before the chief scientist revealed science’s estimated economic worth to Australia, chief curmudgeon John Cleese tweeted on January 3: ’I would like 2016 to be the year when people remembered that science is a method of investigation, and NOT a belief system.’ Without science, we would not know the role of carbon dioxide in contributing to global warming or that the plastic rubbish in the ocean will outweigh the fish by 2050, given projected growth in consumption in a business-as-usual scenario: http://bit.ly/plasreport. Whether knowing this will improve our welfare, or the planet’s, depends on how we act upon it. Science is, of course, a double-edged sword – like most swords. Chief brain Stephen Hawking recently proclaimed, ‘We face a number of threats to our survival from nuclear war, catastrophic global warming, and genetically engineered viruses.’ With self-sustaining colonies in space at least a hundred years away, according to Hawking, and the Starship Enterprise’s warp drive still only a fantasy, we could easily succumb to the results of misused science – or just plain old human stupidity. Science’s chief investigation could be the phenomenon of stupidity, its causes and cures, and how we might immunise ourselves against it before it spoils our day. Michael McDonald

The Byron Shire Echo Established 1986

alcolm Turnbull’s ritual pilgrimage to his great and powerful friend went very much according to plan. Some worried that the handshakes were not quite as effusive as they might have been, but there was no doubting the mutual protestations of undying loyalty. Our prime minister acclaimed America as powerful, effective, a leader in every sphere; he was every bit as compliant and indeed subservient as even his sternest critic (Greg Sheridan, The Australian’s Yankophile foreign editor) expected and demanded. There had been the merest whisper that Turnbull might be (shock, horror) a touch bolshie – he might display a modicum of independence. After all, his defence minister Marise Payne had actually knocked back, in the politest possible way, a suggestion by her American counterpart Ash Carter that Australia might actually increase its ground forces in Iraq and Syria. But it turned out that there was no problem at all: Carter, Barack Obama and indeed anyone who could get a word in assured Turnbull that all was well; Australia was doing just as required by the alliance (well, hegemony actually, but we don’t call it that) and was in fact contributing to the cause second only to the United States itself – what could be fairer than that? It turned out that the Carter request had not been a personal plea, but more in the nature of a form letter to whom it may concern. The Pentagon was keen for everyone, but more particularly the Europeans and the Middle Eastern nations, to lift their game – be in it, you slackers. The exhortation was not aimed at Canberra – heaven forbid. In the circumstances it might have been more tactful to

have said so earlier, but no real harm done. The relationship, the partnership as we call it for reasons of diplomacy, was as sound as ever. And of course, when Liberal prime ministers have been involved, it was ever thus. From the days when Robert Menzies sent an urgent telegram to Washington, imploring that someone be found to get the venal and corrupt government in Saigon to transmit a formal request to Canberra so that Australia might take part in the disastrous American adventure in Vietnam, the parade of what Mark Latham described

for instance, was always firmly on side with whatever Washington required of him, and even Latham, despite his early rhetoric, wrapped himself in the stars and stripes when it appeared politic. The great recalcitrant was of course Gough Whitlam, loathed and feared by Nixon to the extent that the Australian government was constantly chided and threatened, if not in fact destabilised. Bob Hawke learned the lesson and constantly boasted of his friendship with secretary of state George Schultz. But even he was forced, to his huge embarrassment, to

The parade of what Mark Latham described as a conga line of suckholes has never really abated by Mungo MacCallum as a conga line of suckholes has never really abated. Harold Holt enthused that he was all the way with LBJ; John Gorton echoed that he would go a-waltzing Matilda in the cause. When Billy McMahon made his fulsome obeisance to Richard Nixon, one Australian reporter at the scene was heard to groan, ‘I wish I was Italian.’ Malcolm Fraser belatedly recanted his support for the Vietnam morass, but in his time as defence minister there was no fiercer hawk. And more recently John Howard and Tony Abbott just couldn’t wait to throw themselves into Afghanistan, Iraq – wherever America led. Even before Washington gave the order, they were pawing at the ground, panting and slavering to unleash their own pups of war. Labor leaders have been a little more circumspect – well, some of them. Kim Beazley,

be overruled by his caucus to cancel a proposed MX missile test in the area. Paul Keating fell back on the formula: ‘We are friends, but friends can disagree.’ But in fact he seldom if ever did. Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard seldom had time to disagree about anything much, and Bill Shorten is clearly disinclined to. And so we muddle on. But although everything was rosy enough last week, there are signs of tension: a cloud no bigger than China is looming across the northern horizon. Howard once averred famously: ‘We do not need to choose between our history and our geography’, by which he meant that we could accommodate all our interests both in the West and in Asia. And when it was just a matter of keeping on side with America in our defence alliance and with China when it came to trade, he was probably right. But it is no

longer as simple as that. China is now a major military power in its own right, and has started to flex its considerable muscle, first in the South China Sea, and then – well, who knows? Washington is nervous, and is responding, initially with naval patrols through the region. Australia has so far declined to join in the show of force, but there is increasing pressure to do more than utter mild remonstrances against its giant neighbour. Sure, we would much prefer to solve the dispute – indeed, to solve all disputes – through diplomacy, but if that doesn’t work, what then? It has been reported (by Greg Sheridan – who else?) that Washington is preparing to lean on Canberra to allow what it calls a sanctuary – by which it means a fully operational military base – on Australian territory, with the aim of launching incursions into the South China Sea and any other convenient targets. This would obviously be extremely controversial within the electorate, to the extent that it could provoke divisions along the lines we once saw in Vietnam. Turnbull, ever the temporiser, would much prefer to avoid such a showdown, but he may not be able to. His pronouncements to date have been moving more towards Washington, and although he is desperately keen to keep Beijing on side – for purely commercial reasons, if nothing else – eventually he may be compelled to make the choice: history or geography? Then where is the overriding national interest? It may be that there isn’t one: Turnbull will be caught in zugswang, the situation in chess in which any move makes the position worse. Like it or not, the world has changed, and it will take an exceptionally agile leader, with a very determined handshake or two, to manage the outcome.

No Gap First Visit

For all new patients with private health insurance that includes dental cover

Nicholas Shand 1948–1996 Founding Editor

General Manager Simon Haslam Editor Hans Lovejoy Photographer Jeff Dawson Advertising Manager Angela Cornell Production Manager Ziggi Browning

$250 Value

Includes:

• Comprehensive Examination • Diagnostic X-rays • Customised 3D treatment plan

No Health Fund No Problem Receive this offer for $50 *waiting periods, annual limits & fund rules apply. Service is restricted to item codes 011, 012, 022 and 037.

Now Open Late Tuesdays

‘The job of a newspaper is to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.’ – Finley Peter Dunne 1867–1936

Call 02 6685 1264

6/18 Mullumbimbi St, Brunswick Heads

8 January 27, 2016 The Byron Shire Echo

w w w.brunswickdental.net Byron Shire Echo archives: www.echo.net.au/byron-echo