notes on self representation as image-metaphor if we analyse each image by an rethorical-analytical point of view one could say that image is a metaphor > (IIIIII) don't know if starting from this point or in this point Not that this means that she only exists to be read, but that she's a vellatura on signification layers, as language herself. (her and she, not it : : : : IMAGE and LANGUAGE are seductive female beings) photography had always walked with ghosts Self presentations, selfies mostly, came from a will to continue the image-metaphor exercise as an absolutely narcisic felling: ??what is there more to represent than ME, MYSELF and I?? (sometimes, my pet.)) mirrored in the mirror, voyering my reflect self, the one who seduces me back in my contemplating moment I fall into the self self self desire So what's the real deal between two in love image-beings knowing themselves through raw material industrial sorting
who is watching is watched back through a self proposed representation how can a self mirrored thing mirror itself in the other (The Other) (here enter the problems that problems themselves have: every image is a metaphor ___________________________ reality is based on a turtle and that turtle on another turtle, a more than infinite tower, even than Brancusi's one, more disconnected than Babel itself)