Page 1

NJ Laws Email E267 January 29, 2008 Kenneth Vercammen, Attorney at Law   732­572­0500   In this issue:  Palimony expanded in  New Jersey Rosemary Connell v. Edward Diehl   01­08­08  A­2331­05T5                   The court held in this palimony action that the supporting person's sole  ownership   of   assets   accumulated   during   their   uninterrupted   thirty­year  cohabitation was not inconsistent with a promise of support for life.   The court  also held that the dependent person was not required to prove that she expected  any remuneration for her efforts to contribute to their marital­type lifestyle over  the years.   Finally, the court held that a trial judge in calculating a lump­sum  palimony award is not required to place the dependent person in the lifestyle she  and   the   supporting   person   enjoyed,   but   rather   to   provide   reasonable   support  sufficient to meet her minimal needs and prevent the necessity of public welfare,   and in doing so must consider inflation in calculating the lump­sum award.

HYVÄÄ JOULUA Quarg- new case constructive trust in Probate case In the Matter of the Estate of Robert O. Quarg, deceased 1-23-08 A-2459-06T3 Decedent's wife, from whom he had been estranged for over forty years, appealed the Chancery Division's order imposing a constructive trust on her surviving spouse's share of decedent's intestate estate in favor of decedent's companion, with whom he had lived since shortly after the estrangement. The court held that, decedent's conduct and actions, together with the lengthy time decedent and his companion lived together, and their mutual consideration as husband and wife, was sufficient to establish a question of fact whether there was an implied promise by decedent to ensure that his companion received adequate provisions during the remainder of her life. The court determined that the Chancery Division mistakenly relied upon an equitable principle of a constructive trust and the court remanded the matter for a determination whether such an


implied contractual promise could be established. Suit for tortious interference with a Bequest must be filed in Probate Court

Felix M. Garruto, et al. v. Lorraine Cannici A-2447-06T1

12-21-07

The Court held that an action for tortious interference with a bequest, premised upon undue influence by means of fraud, is barred when plaintiffs, with knowledge of probate proceedings, have failed to file a timely challenge to the will in probate court.

NJLaws.Com LINKS  Main Website with 500    + articles and    1,000    + links  (732) 572­0500 Thank you for reading our newsletter!  God Bless America USA #1 Our updated law blogs: NJLaws' Newsletter Blog­http://njlaws1.blogspot.com/ NJ Criminal Law Blog ­ http://njcriminallaw.blogspot.com/ NJ Traffic Law & Municipal Court Blog ­ http://traffic­law.blogspot.com/ NJ Personal Injury & Civil Law Blog­ http://njlawspersonalinjury.blogspot.com NJ Elder Law Blog ­http://elder­law.blogspot.com/ NJ Drug Law Blog ­ http://drugarrest.blogspot.com/           We appreciate continued referrals. We want to take the time to extend to  our friends and clients our sincere gratitude because it is good friends and  clients that make our business grow. Client recommendation is a very  important source of new clients to us. We are grateful for the recommendation  of new clients. We will do our best to give all clients excellent care. We shall  do our best to justify all recommendations.           "Celebrating more than 21 years of providing excellent service to clients  1985­2007" Former Prosecutor


This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know  someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have  them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.           Free T­ shirts and soda can holders available for all current and past  clients. Please come into office. Editor's Note and Disclaimer: All materials Copyright 2007. You may pass along the information on the NJ  Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law  Office is included. KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC ATTORNEY AT LAW 2053 Woodbridge Ave. Edison, NJ 08817 (Phone) 732­572­0500 (Fax) 732­572­0030 website: www.njlaws.com   Admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, US  Supreme Court and Federal District Court

E267 draft  

In this issue: Palimony expanded in New Jersey Kenneth Vercammen, Attorney at Law 732­572­0500 NJ Laws Email E267 January 29, 2008

Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you