2013 The Full Bench Ed 1

Page 15

THE DUTY TO RESCUE

Photo - Cristian Bernal

Should we all be Good Samaritans? The duty to rescue: a moral conundrum Is it ok to walk by someone dying on the street? The law says that where there is no pre-existing ‘duty’ it is; yet something seems terribly wrong with this image. Anita Juric explores the practicality, possibility and implications of generalised ‘duty to rescue’ law in Australia.

T

he disparate interplay of morality

legal duty to rescue is restricted to

Nonetheless, the ethical dilemma of a duty

and law attracts controversial

cases involving a special or fiduciary

to rescue in a social framework has arisen

discourse regarding the question of

relationship between the parties such

in numerous cases, in which it appears that

whether there can and should be a legal

as that of employer and employee. 3

heroism is morally and physically rewarded

duty to rescue. Many would assert that

The Australian courts are hesitant

while individuals who are driven by their own

there is surely a moral duty to render

to interpret the existence of a broad

self-interest in refusing to rescue others are

4

assistance to others in need and there

duty to rescue among society and

ought to be a corresponding legal duty.

the legislature is equally reluctant

In one case, a Melbournian 16-year-old,

Yet the law establishes a different view.

to enact laws governing such a

Sam Porter, heroically saved the life of a

The current legal position

duty. This has largely stemmed from

young man who intentionally jumped onto

policy

considerations,

the train tracks after he was beaten and

by

distinction

Imagine a situation in which a medical practitioner is informed that

the

5

informed

between

denigrated.

acts

robbed by a third party. Porter’s courageous

an 11-year-old boy is suffering from

and omissions,

and the arguably

action sparked nationwide attention and

prolonged epileptic seizures a mere

impractical nature of extending the

the media was fast to dub him ‘Super Sam.’

300 metres away. Dismissively, the

scope of the legal duty to rescue.

He was rewarded with a Pride of Australia

practitioner refuses a request to attend

However, the absence of a duty

to the child. The practitioner’s inaction

to rescue is ethically problematic as

“Sam Porter may be the closest thing

leads the child to suffer permanent

it represents a dispassionate fissure

Melbourne has to a superhero,” The Herald

brain damage and quadriplegia.

of morality and law that enables

Sun stated. 8

Outstanding Bravery Award.

individuals to refuse to assist those

On the contrary, and in a case where praise

the case of Woods v Lowns, the

in imperilled situations. In addition, a

of valour was hard to find, Mark Inglis refused

principle judgment contributing to

pervading social fear exists whereby

to assist a man who was in a fatal condition

the development of the law of rescue

individuals are cautious and unwilling

when climbing Mount Everest. Interestingly,

in Australia. The case held that in those

to help others due to concerns of

Inglis himself had been previously rescued in

circumstances, the medical practitioner

potential litigation.

a similar incident.

This was the tragic reality in 1

was negligent for failing to render

In order to counteract these issues,

Inglis was strongly of the view that a duty

assistance to the child. However, had

Parliament has enforced legislation in

to rescue was not a moral or legal duty that

the circumstances been different and

respect to ‘Good Samaritans’, which

should be upheld, and even went to the extent

a distinctive relationship between the

operates to exclude personal civil

of acknowledging that his own rescuers were

parties had not been established, a

liability for those who righteously

under no obligation to help him, and should

duty to rescue would not have been

aid individuals in dire circumstances

have placed their lives above his own.

found.

using reasonable care and skill.6 This

“You should never, when you have

At common law, no general legal

is further supported by the ability

conscious thought, lose your life to save

requirement exists in civil or criminal

to recover damages on behalf of an

someone else’s,” he said. 9

law to assist others in danger.2 A

injured rescuer.7

In light of these stories, the question then

The Full Bench

15


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.