Page 88

QS World University Rankings for Engineering and Information Technology Figure 6.3a QS World University Rankings, Top 50 Universities for Engineering and Information Technology, 2015 Massachusetts Inst of Tech Stanford U U Cambridge National U Singapore ETH Zurich Nanyang Tech U Imperial College London U California, Berkeley U Oxford Harvard U Tsinghua U U Tokyo Korea Adv Inst of Sci and Tech Hong Kong U of Sci and Tech Seoul National U California Inst of Tech Ecole Polytech Féd Lausanne U Melbourne Delft U of Tech Georgia Inst of Tech U New South Wales Tokyo Inst of Tech U California, Los Angeles Politec Milano Princeton U U Hong Kong Peking U Kyoto U Carnegie Mellon U Tech U München U Sydney U Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Shanghai Jiao Tong U Cornell U National Taiwan U KTH, Royal Inst of Tech U Michigan U Texas, Austin Monash U U Queensland Pohang U of Sci and Tech Australian National U Chinese U of Hong Kong Indian Inst of Tech, Delhi Hong Kong Polytech U Tech U Denmark Tech U Berlin U Manchester Toronto UUToronto U College London

Figure 6.3b QS World University Rankings, Top North American Public Universities for Engineering and Information Technology, 2015 U California, Berkeley Georgia Inst of Tech U California, Los Angeles U Illinois, Urbana-Champaign U Michigan U Texas, Austin U Toronto Toronto U Purdue U UUBritish BritishColumbia Columbia McGill U McGill U U Waterloo Waterloo U U California, San Diego Texas A&M U U Washington U Wisconsin, Madison Pennsylvania State U Virginia Tech Ohio State U U California, Davis U Minnesota North Carolina State U U Maryland, College Park U California, Santa Barbara U Florida U Alberta Alberta U Michigan State U U Colorado, Boulder Montréal UUMontréal U California, Irvine U Massachusetts, Amherst

7 9 10 11

25

28

U of T Engineering, once again, outperformed all otherFigure Canadian 6.3buniversities in the QS World University for Rankings, EngineeringTop North Ameri QS WorldRankings University and Information Technology and was theTechnology, only Engineering and Information 2015 Canadian school in the top 50. We were also recognized as one of the premier North American public universities, placing seventh among these peer institutions. U ofChapter: T rankedCh.6 the highest of - Rankings any CanadianExcel engineering school in five out of sixRanking 2015 Filename: 6.3a-c - QS World engineering and information technology subjects, Sheet: 6.3b demonstrating our broadDate: strength. July 15, 2016 49 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Despite our position in the QS ranking, U of T Engineering, like all Canadian U15 engineering schools in the top 200 globally, experienced Figure 6.3c Canadian U15 in Top 200 from QS World volatility in the rankings. Several U15 schools University Rankings for Engineering and Information that had placed within the top 200 in 2014 fell Technology, 2015 below this threshold in 2015. Nearly all of the top U Toronto Toronto U 49 Figure 6.3a engineering programs at North American public QS World University Rankings, Top 50 Universities for U British Columbia 63 universities also dropped in the global rankings, Engineering and Information Technology, 2015 but within this subset there was a high degree McGill U 67 of stability relative to one another. The subjectU Waterloo 74 level rankings also remained stable year-overChapter: Ch.6 - Rankings U Alberta 179 year, especially among North American peer Excel Filename: 6.3a-c - QS World Ranking 2015 - Engineering (AR16 6.3a-c) - v1.xlsx U Montréal 187 institutions. Sheet: 6.3a Date: July 15, 2016 84 Chapter 6: World Recognition by Rankings | Annual Report 2016 | Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Annual Report Performance Indicators 2016  

This is the annual report of performance indicators for the Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering at the University of Toronto.

Advertisement