Architecture Portfolio Triin Lehtmets selected projects
CV Triin Lehtmets female 10.11.1989, born in Tallinn +372 53 400 650 email@example.com Education 2012- 2014 Tallinn University of Technology, Master of Architecture 2008- 2012 Tallinn University of Applied Sciences, Applied Bachelor of Applied Architecture 2010/2011 Brno University of Technology, faculty of Architecture (ERASMUS scholarship) 1996- 2008 Tallinn Technical Secondary School work experience 2013- ... Arhitektuurimootor OÜ, architect/partner 2014- ... VELUX Estonia/Finland/Latvia/LIithuania, architect 2014 Anmeri OÜ, architect 2012-2015 Tallinn University of Technology, ROBOTEX, workshops and creative contests coordinator 2013 www.archieli.com, content creator 2011 Architecture office internship Arhitektid Muru ja Pere OÜ AWARDS & MENTIONINGS IN ARCHITECTURE COMPETITIONS 2016 Põltsama public space idea competition, special award 2013 Tartu business centre and bus station vision competition, jury mentioning (with Ivo- Sven Riet, Priit Lõhmus) 2013 “Minihansa architecture competition in Viljandi” 1. award (with Ivo- Sven Riet, Anna Jurasevitš) 2012 “Märka sõltuvust” sculpture competition, jury mentioning (with Ivo- Sven Riet) 2012 Ruukki IDEA noise barrier competition, 3. award (with Ivo- Sven Riet) 2012 Isover Multi-Comfort House Students Contest, 1. award national stage (with Ivo- Sven Riet, Kärt Milsaar) PARTICIPATION IN ARCHITECTURE COMPETTIONS 2015 EV100 city installation idea competition (with Anna Endrikson, Ivo- Sven Riet) 2014 EeStairs Design Competition “Keerdus” (with Anna Temmo, Ivo- Sven Riet) 2012 International Velux Award “ Light of Tomorrow” (with Anna Temmo, Indrek Palm) OTHER CREATIVE ACTIVITY 2016-... Croquis drawing at Tõnis Laanemaa art studio 2014 Workshop: Sound in space, space in sound, Estonian Interior Architects Association 2013 Street intervention “MAKETT 1:1”, Estonian Architects Uninon Youth Section 2013 Installation “City Canon”, exhibited at “MAKETT 1:1” street intervention, Tallinn Architecture Biennale, Tallinn Light Biennale (with Anna Temmo, Andres Ristov, Karel Kask, Aleksandra Papunova) 2011 Workshop and exhibition “Vranov”, Brno University of Technology, 2011 Workshop:”Smart Facade Rävala pst. 6”, Tallinn University Applied Sciences 2008 “Interior Drawing Course” Estonian Academy of Arts 2007 “Product Development and Design Course” Tallinn University of Technology Volunteering Member of Estonian Architects Uninon Youth Section since 2013 Member of AEGEE (European Students Forum) since 2009 Internal Affairs Manager of AEGEE-Tallinn 2009-2010 Languages Estonian English Computer skills AutoCAD SketchUp Adobe Illustrator Adobe Photoshop Adobe InDesign
SUURUPI MAJA A reconstruction and extension of an old yard house 2015
KAANON Urban Installation 2013
A RHITEKTIDE K A S V UHOONE Restoration of Tallinn Watertower 2014
MOLEKUL Viljandi Minihansa Theme Park 2013
KEERDUS EeStairs Design Competition 2014
BLACK AND WHITE International Velux Award 2012
LISAJÃ•GI Tartu Business Centre and Bus Station Vision Competition 2013
TORUS Ruukki Idea Noise Barrier Competition 2012
A house in Suurupi, 2015 Co- Author: Ivo- Sven Riet
A reconstruction of an old yard house and an extension. The existing house was a one storey flat roof building on wooden structure in the shape of two cubes. The new building joins the two cubes into a whole, one under the roof storey will be added. The home will be accomodated by a family of four, parents and two children. The main living area will be on the first floor and bedrooms under the roof on the second floor. The reconstructed house is 132 square meters. The first floor plan follows the sun, the rooms where the family will spend most of their time, such as kitchen, dining and livingroom will get most of the light during the daytime. The morning sun will come through windows and roofwindows on the eastern facade to give light on the kitchen table. The daytime and evening light will shine to the livingroom and dining table area.
VAADE LÕUNAST (TÄNAVALT)
VAADE LÄÄNEST (SISSEPÄÄS)
KÜLALISTE TUBA / KABINET 9 9,6 m2
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.
TEHNILINE RUUM LEIL PESU WC MAJAPIDAMISRUUM KÖÖK ESIK ELUTUBA KÜLALISTETUBA MAGAMISTUBA VANNITUBA TREPIHALL MAGAMISTUBA MAGAMISTUBA
Arhitektide kasvuhoone, Restoration of Tallinn Watertower, 2014 Tallinn University of Technology Co- Authors: Anna Temmo, Ivo- Sven Riet
Situation at the moment At the moment the Tallinn water tower which is connected by walls with Tallinn College is out of use. As the tower is now in the hands of Architecture institute, new functions for are architecture students and also for the citizens are meant to be given to it. The height of the tower is 33.8 m, and diameter 13.7m. Tere are four concrete levels and a high atrium inside the tower, built in the late 20th century. The water tower still has its original water tank at the top. The attic of the Tallinn College building is not in use right now but it will accomodate new rooms for the Architecture Institute. The aim is to plan a modelling studio and chill-out area with a kitchen so that the whole attic could be used 24/7.
Tower As we were fascinated about the space inside the tower, which was practically screaming for temporary installations, we decided not to pull down or destroy allmost anything inside of it. The firs floor and fist level will be an exhibition area open for citizens ,the nex three levels will also be exhibition areas, but only for the institute students. The current water tank will be transformed into an auditorium. Attic The attic will be restorated in a way that destroys as little as possible. All the existing columns will stay in place and they are used as space dividers. The attic is planned in a way that different functions will cause people to move around (i.e. between the library and modeling area) and that will make it easier for students to start communication with each other.
Steps for sitting, min. 50 people Audtiorium
Gallery around the water tank New stairway to the water tank
Extra stairway to metal platform
Exhibition platform New door to school building
Existing metal staircade will be restored and glass panels will be added to the existing railings
New passway to the schoolhouse New railings for the platforms
Exhibition platform New railings for the existing concrete stairs, which double as exhibition walls Public exhibition platform
Public exhibition area, admin Wine cellar, restrooms, relaxing area
The existing high openings in the walls will be lowered All ground level floors will be balanced on the same level
Arhitektide kasvuhoone, Restoration of the attic of Tallinn University of Technology Tallinn College , 2014 Tallinn University of Technology Co- Authors: Anna Temmo, Ivo- Sven Riet
Attic In current situation, there is only one way to get to the attic. According to fire inspection, an extra stairway is needed. The new staircase will be outside the building going from the 4th floor to attic.
chill- out area
modeling studio kitchen
workspace chill- out area
higher modeling tables reach to the wall, forming stacking surfaces
lower sheds are used for stacking drawers and seating
Keerdus, EeStairs Design Competition, 2014 Co- Authors: Anna Temmo, Ivo- Sven Riet
Explanation motivation: For competition task we chose a building in Tallinn city centre that dates back to 1935. It was extended in 1958 and is currently under heritage protection. Two years ago an architecture school was opened in this building. The school has a plan to adapt the attic for students studio. There are two main problems that need to be solved. First, the attic doesnâ€™t have enought natural sunlight. Second in order to fulfill the emergency requirements a second exit to the third floor needs to be built. We decided to solve the natural light problem by introducing additional dormer windows and use them as a binding element for solving second exit problem. For the second exit we decided to design an exterior staircase between the third floor and the attic to save as much indoor space as we could. There was no need for a new opening in the facade because of existing balcony on the third floor. As these balconies are on every floor, it leaves an opportunity to extend the staircase or add an elevator and create connection with all remaining floors.
Explanation design The stair is a light, sculptural form that gives a hint about the architecture school. It has an unconventional style with glass floor and ceiling and solid walls. The stairâ€™s fraimwork consists of four prefabricated steel beams and diagonal connections. The lower support structure is made of modular elements which form the steps. As walls finishing we chose brushed cement rendering with a conceptual translucent skyline using optic fiber. The staircaseâ€™s roof and floor are made of glass panes on steel framework.
Emajõe Business Centre and Tartu Bus Station Surroundings Vision Competition, 2013 Co- Authors: Ivo- Sven Riet, Priit Lõhmus
Competition task There are lots of business enterprises near Emajõe Business Centre and Tasku shopping centre. The area is visited by lots of people dayly. There is also a bus terminal in the area. The competition was organised to find a solution around the bus station and business centre that would be human friendly and also rethink the spacial identity of Tartu´s new city centre and harbour area.
covered area for bicycle parking and bicycle rental
wavy path with wooden rendering
the access to parking and bus manoovering area is on the same level as the surrounding square. The manoovering area is separated with small posts. If there are no busses parking, the area feels as one big square.
the pedestrian area between buildings is boardened to give visual and physical access to the main entrance of the hotel
the front of the bus station and shopping mall is boardened and turned into an area for pedestrians and cyclists. To activize the street, the existing covering will be built closed so that little shops and
“The solution connects the whole competition area into one whole public space that is mainly oriented for pedestrians, which is a proposal we approve. Calming down the traffic with pavement is widely used and very European approach. The handwriting of this work is sensitive, but in such a large area unreal and economically too expensive. The L-shaped public shape turns around Dorpat Hotel and connects Soola street with the riverside. The design is unique and clever. As a positive aspect wewould bring forth the wide pedestrian area in front of the bus station and the riverside solution. There might not be room for a small boat harbour. Unfortunately there is no place forr kiss&go parking space. The wavy roofed bycycle parks are nice but very expensive and too far away from the building entrances.”
sand covered playground
Installation “City Canon” and MAKETT 1:1 Street Intervention Co- Authors of “City Canon”: Anna Temmo, Karel Kask, Andres Ristov, Aleksandra Papunova Exhibited: on Street Intervention “MAKETT 1:1” on Mere Street in Tallinn; Architecture School´s Exhibition at Tallinn Architecture Biennale 2013; on top of Musumägi (Kissing Hill) at Tallinn Light Biennale 2013
“A street intervention by young architects describes in 1:1 scale – i.e. in the existing urban space – what could a modern city street for a diverse user base feel like. Our most important goal is to re-establish the street as a natural space for the city’s inhabitants. This intervention is as an experimental tool in the hands of future architects. It is a way to evaluate real changes in the street during the planning process.” by MAKETT 1:1
“„City Canon“ was inspired by discussion on urban proportions and dimensions. Tallinn is a heterogeneous structure of different neighborhoods. The urban space conceals a higher potential than we see being used today. This experiment aims to turn people’s attention to it by creating a contrasting space which is unfamiliar to what we feel and see everyday. This installation was originally designed and prepared for a street intervention “M1:1 - a 1:1 Scale Model of a Modern Sity Street”” by Tallinn Light Biennale
Viljandi Minihansa Themepark Vision Competition, Molekul, 2013 Co- Authors: Anna Jurasevitš, Ivo- Sven Riet
Location: „Minihansa“ exhibition is an important part of emracing the Culture of Viljandi. It will attract locals and tourists. Keeping thatin mind, the location of MOLEKUL is chosen to be in the crossroad of existing pathways in Valuoja park. The existing and planned paths will lead the visitors to Minihansa area. The area is also well seen from the roads around the park.
ing points, which are
like system which
important part of the solution is creating a new health track which will be connected to the exitsting recreation area near Paala lake.The pedestrian way will go all around the park and it will have several resting points with sitting opportunities. The new resting points will have new greenery around them, where amongst other trees, fruit trees will be planted.
The Hansaetic Cities models will be exhibited on a surrounded area, near the most importat pathway of the park. The exhbition area is 3700 sqm, from which 650 sqm is on the island. 24 towns (51%) will have their models on inner land and 19 (39%) by the â€œseaâ€? and 5 towns on the island. There are three different sizes for model areas. The smallest are 20sqm, the middle ones 40sqm and the biggest ones are 60sqm. Minihansa exhibition area is placed on a concrete ground with different levels.The concrete area extends in front of the exhibition area, giving some room for visitor groups to gather before entering. The area can also be used for holding small public events.
International Velux Award “Light of Tomorrow”, Black and White - smart facade module, 2012 Co- Authors: Anna Temmo, Indrek Palm
At the beginning of our design process we asked ourselves a question: What would be one At the beginning of our design process we asked ourselves a question:
ofWhat the main when talking aboutwhen the daylightand today? wouldproblems be one oftomorrow the main problems tomorrow talking about architecture the daylightand architecture today?
After thorough discussion we understood that the problems of tomorrow are very similar to After thorough discussion we understood that the problems of tomorrow are very similar to the ones we
the ones Main issues concerning daylight can always be divided into have today.we Mainhave issues today. concerning daylight can always be divided into two categories:
1) Problem that there is not enough insolation in the new or old buildings.
1)2)Problem that there not overexposure enough insolation in the new buildings. Problems that comeiswith of interior spaces to or theold sunlight like overheating or exessive light in workspace.
2) Problems that come with overexposure of interior spaces to the sunlight like overheating We came to the conclusion that of the two mentioned situations the main
problem is the second
orone. exessive lightofintheworkspace. Mainly because fact that when solving the problem of not having enough insolation one may very easily cause the situation when the room becomes overexposed to the light.
We came to the conclusion that of the two mentioned situations the main problem is the Issue
with the traditional passive sunprotection systems is that they start
second one.form Mainly of complex the fact that when solving the problem of not having enough facadé systems on the other hand are too architectural of thebecause building. More BEGINNING
technology static cause in function the real life situation complicatedone in theirmay insolation veryor too easily thewhensituation whenoftenthe room becomes overexposed needs them to be dynamic and adaptive to changing light- or weather conditions. At the beginning of our design process we asked ourselves a question:
to the light.
BEGINNING What would be one of the main problems tomorrow when talking about the CONCEPT
daylightand architecture today? a question: Issue with the themain traditional passive sunprotection systems is that they start dictating the At the beginning of our design process wecurrent asked ourselves Considering shortcomings of the systems we decided to try and come up with a
Whatthat would be one of adopted the mainonMore problems tomorrow when talking about system can beof easily to the existing buildings without the need architectural form the building. complex facadé systems on theforthe other hand are too PROBLEM daylightand architecture also integrated into new designs. complex technological systems andtoday?
complicated inthis their technology or too static function when the real life situation Also we felt that system should bewe able to react tointhe the changing conditions , similar After thorough discussion understood that problems of light tomorrow are very to the often ones we PROBLEM adopting to the ofMain the current situation on daylight the facadé. had be to divided be doneinto without the haveneeds today. issues concerning canThis always
needs them to beordynamic and adaptive tosystems. changing light-theordriving weather conditions. complex sensors expensive technological Therefore force for two categories: MODULE
After thorough discussion we understood that the problems of tomorrow are very similar to the ones we changing the facadé should come from the design itself.
have today. Main issues concerning daylight can always be divided into CONCEPT
PERFORATED STEEL PLATES
two categories: 1) Problem
that there is not enough insolation in the new or old buildings.
SOLUTION 1) Problem that thereorisexessive not enough insolation in the new or old buildings. like overheating lightthe in most workspace. After these considerations we understood that logical way of achiveing these goals is to use 2)a system Problems thatcan come with overexposure of to interior spaces tobuildings the sunlight with that bearranged easily adopted on the without the need for identical modules that are in a grid. Each of theexisting modules should be fully like overheating or exessive light in workspace. We in came to the conclusion that sensitivity of the twotomentioned thethe main problem is the second Including the light andsituations heat and also powering autonomous its functioning. complex technological systems and also integrated into new designs. Also we one. because ofthe thetwo factmentioned that when solving theamain problem of not having enough insolation one may of the modules canthat be attatched to the facadé using grid problem of carriers when Wemodule.The came to theMainly conclusion of situations the is and the second
Considering mainthat shortcomings of the current systems decided 2) the Problems come with overexposure of interior spaceswe to the sunlightto try and come up
very easilybe the situation when the room overexposed to the light. damaged, easily replaced one by one without the need forproblem extensive reconstruction. one. Mainly because ofcause theable fact that whenreact solving the ofchanging not having enough insolation one may system should to to thebecomes light conditions, very easily cause the situation when the room becomes overexposed to the light.
felt that this
adopting to the needs of
DESIGN Issue with the on traditional passive sunprotection that they start dictating the sensors or exthe current situation the facadé. This had systems to be isdone without the complex
BASICS MOVEMENT BASICS
with the traditionalform passive systems that they start systems dictating theother hand are . Moreiscomplex facadé on the architectural of sunprotection the building
Thearchitectural design oftechnological the modules inspired. by nature with its processes andthe reactions toare the pensive Therefore the driving force for More complex facadé systems on other hand too changing the facadé should form isofmainly the systems. building complicated in their technology or too static in function when the real life situation often Also theinform modules comes the facadé elements when of some soviet-era sunlight. theiroftechnology or from too static in function thedistinctive real life situation often complicated
needs design them to be dynamic and adaptive to changing light- or weather conditions. come from itself. needs them to be dynamic and adaptive changing light-Tallinn or weather architecture inthe Tallinn, Estonia. Due to thattowe also chose toconditions. be the location of the
building for our sample building.
CONCEPT SOLUTION CONCEPT
The modules themselvesthe consist eight identical pieces of systems perforated steel plates. After these understood the most achiveing these goals Considering main of shortcomings ofsystems the current weand decided to with try and comeof up with a Considering theconsiderations main shortcomings ofwe the current we that decided to try comelogical up a way
The movement of the pieces comes from the strips in the corners of the pieces made of system that can be easily to the existing without the need for system that can adopted be easilyonadopted on to buildings the existing buildings without the need for
iscomposite to use material. identical modules are arranged in materials a grid. that Each The strips are ment that to act similar to the bimetal curve of the modules should be fully complex technological systems and also integrated into new designs. complex technological also integrated due to the diﬀerent thermal expansionsystems factors ofand the materials used in them.into
Also we felt that system should be able to react to sensitivity the changing lightthe conditions , Also we that this system should be able to react to to the changing , autonomous inthisfelt its functioning. Including light light andconditions heat and also the pow-
adopting to facade the needs of the that current situation of on30x30cm the facadé. This reacts had to be without the Therefore the system modules to done the adopting to the needsisofcomposed the current situation on the facadé. Thisheat had gain to be done
WIND VENTILATION CHANNELS MODULE
complex sensors or expensive technological systems. Therefore the force ering of complex the module.The modules cantechnological beincreases attatched to driving the facadé using a grid of carriers and When temperature the modules open , for from the direct sunlight. sensors or the expensive systems. Therefore the driving force for PERFORATED STEEL PLATES
PERFORATED STEEL PLATES
changing the facadé should come from the design itself. providing changing shade forthe the windows behind them. the intensity facadé should come fromWhen the design itself.
of sun reduces
when damaged, easily replaced one by one without the need for extensive reconstruction. modules close. This results in living facadé structure that reacts to the changes in intensity SOLUTION
of the sunlight. For example – when in urban context some of the surrounding buildings cast a shadow SOLUTION DESIGN on the facadé then the path of the shadow could be seen on the facade due to the thermal diﬀerneces
After these considerations we understood that the most logical way of achiveing these goals is to use in modules.
Theidentical design of the modules inspired by nature with its processes modules that are arranged in mainly a grid. Each of the should be fullythese After these considerations weis understood that the mostmodules logical way of achiveing goals is to use and reactions to Including sensitivity toin thealight andEach heat and powering should be fully autonomous in itsmodules functioning. identical that are arranged grid. of also thethe modules
In addition to the shading the modules provide when fully open venilation channels form the sunlight. form ofto the modules comes theandfacadé elements of some distincof the module.TheAlso modules the can be attatched facadé using a gridfrom of carriers when beneath the modular grid providing additional coolingIncluding for the building. sensitivity to the light and heat and also the powering autonomous in its functioning. damaged, easily replaced one by one without the need for extensive reconstruction.
of the module.The modulesin can Tallinn, be attatched to the facadé using a grid and when tive soviet-eranarchitecture Estonia. Due to that weof carriers also chose Tallinn to be the Also the important autonomity factor is achieved. damaged, easily replaced one by one without the need for extensive reconstruction.
NoDESIGN centralofcontrol external power sources are needed for the functioning of the location the orbuilding for our sample building. The modules themselves consist of eight
MOVEMENT AXLE BINDING
independent facadé elements.
The design of the modules is mainly inspired by nature with its processes and reactions to the identical pieces of perforated steel plates. The movement of the pieces comes from the
sunlight. Also the form of modules comes from the facadé elements of some distinctive soviet-era ofEstonia. the modules is mainly inspired by nature processes to the are architecture indesign Tallinn, Due to that we also chose Tallinn be with the its location of and thereactions strips in The the corners of the pieces made ofto composite material. The strips buildingsunlight. for our sample building. Also the form of modules comes from the facadé elements of some distinctive soviet-era
ment to act
similar toarchitecture the bimetal that curve dueTallinn to the thermal in Tallinn, materials Estonia. Due to that we also chose to bedifferent the location of theexpansion factors The
modules themselves consist of eight identical pieces of perforated steel plates.
building for our sample building. of The the movement materials used in them. Therefore the facade system that is composed of 30x30cm of the pieces comes from the strips in the corners of the pieces made of strips heat are ment gain to act similar tothe the bimetal that curve composite material. modules reacts to Thethe from directmaterials sunlight. When the temperature increases modules consist eightused identical due to theThe diﬀerent thermal themselves expansion factors of theof materials in them. pieces of perforated steel plates. The movement of the pieces comes from the strips in the corners of the pieces made of the modules open, providing shade for the windows behind them. When the intensity of sun Therefore composite the facade system that The is composed of ment 30x30cm modules reacts the heat gain material. strips are to act similar to to the bimetal materials that curve
WIND VENTILATION CHANNELS
When expansion the temperature increases modules open, from the sunlight. duedirect tomodules the diﬀerent thermal factors ofinthe materialsthe used in them. reduces the close. This results living facadé structure that reacts to the changes
for the windows behind them. When the
intensity of sun reduces
in modules intensity of This the sunlight. Forthat example inmodules urban context of the surrounding close. results in living facadé structure that–reacts to the changes in intensity Therefore the facade system is composed ofwhen 30x30cm reacts to the some heat gain WIND VENTILATION CHANNELS
of the sunlight. For example – when in urban context some of the surrounding buildings cast a shadow
from the direct sunlight. the temperature increases the modules open, buildings cast on could the When facadé then theto the path ofdiﬀerneces the shadow could be seen on the on the facadé then a the shadow path of the shadow be seen on the facade due thermal providing in modules.
for the windows behind them. When the
intensity of sun reduces
facade duemodules to the thermal differneces in modules. close. This results in living facadé structure that reacts to the changes in intensity
In addition to the shadingFor theexample modules provide when fully opensome venilation channels form of the sunlight. – when in urban context of the surrounding buildings cast a shadow
In addition tomodular the shading the modules provide when open venilation channels form on the facadé the path of the shadow could be seenfully on the facade due to the thermal diﬀerneces additional cooling for the building. beneath the grid then providing in modules.
beneath the modular gridis achieved. providing additional cooling for the building. Also the important Also the important autonomity factor No central control or external power sources are needed
for the functioning of the
In addition to shading the modules provide when fully venilation channels form autonomity factor is theachieved. No central control oropen external power sources are needed for independent facadé elements. beneath the modular grid providing additional cooling for the building.
the functioning of the independent facadé elements. Also the important autonomity factor is achieved.
No central control or external power sources are needed
independent facadé elements.
for the functioning of the
BLACK AND WHITE
LIGHT OF TOMORROW smart facade module
RUUKKII IDEA Noise Barrier Competition, TORUS, 2012 Co- Author: Ivo- Sven Riet
noise barrier + pedestrain road = torus The IDEA of Torus is to combine noise barrier with a safe pedestrian and/or cycling road. The construction of Torus is based on steel frame.Torus consists of modules which can be added or taken away if neccessary. The modules are closed from highway side and open to park or residental area. Torus also gives an opportunity to design a bridge accross the highway. The construction can be done in a way that it would look like like a stretched module.
Modular steel frame
Padding and glass partitions
Pedestrian way and benches
Published on Feb 6, 2014