These are both false. While it may be true that some strange fellow would sooner caress the buxom curves of infinitesimal calculus, by and large a natsci is as capable of desire as any cunning linguist. Moreover, ‘asexual’ would often be better replaced with ‘aloof’. While it is another debate entirely as to whether or not this particularly niche breed of singleton actually merits pity, it probably suffices to say that they have no idea they’re looking through you rather than at you.