Local Integrity System Assessment Toolkit

Page 45

DIMENSION

GOVERNANCE

Indicator number

2.8

Indicator name:

Integrity of the local executive

To what extent is the integrity of the local executive ensured?

Indicator question(s)

Are there comprehensive rules and codes for members of the executive (rules on conflict of interest, gifts and hospitality, asset disclosures, “revolving door” appointments, whistleblower protection, etc.)? Are these enforced in practice? Have there been recent examples of conflicts of interest or the “revolving door” phenomenon?

All of the above rules and codes are in place and effectively enforced and there have been no recent examples of conflicts of interest or the “revolving door” phenomenon

Assessment

Only some of the above rules and codes are in place with piecemeal enforcement and/or there has been at least one recent example of conflicts of interest or the “revolving door” phenomenon

None of the above rules and codes are in place and there have been numerous recent examples of conflicts of interest or the “revolving door” phenomenon

Source of information

Legislative documents, policies, interviews

Narrative comments

Recommendation(s)

LOCAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ASSESSMENT TOOLKIT

Advocacy target(s)

45


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.