International Crusade for Holy Relics – Internal Report - Members Only
Dear Tom, Well caught! I received the following e-mail from Mr/Bishop Timlin while I was on holiday. I had an uneasy feeling and didn't reply... Regards, _________________ ________________________________________ >Return-Path: Bp______@aol.com >Delivery-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1999 19:34:56 +0100 >Received: from imo24.mx.aol.com by mail-b.bcc.ac.uk with SMTP (PP) with ESMTP; > Sat, 14 Aug 1999 19:34:46 +0100 >Received: from by imo24.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v22.4.) > id aORDa14808 (14461) for <>; > Sat, 14 Aug 1999 14:35:31 -0400 (EDT) >X-UIDL: 934750140.003 >From: >Message-ID: <> >Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1999 14:35:31 EDT >Subject: GREETINGS >To: >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 21 >Status: RO > >I recently joined the ICHR (and am very happy about it).... >>I am currently the custodian of over 30 First Class Relics.....do you know of >any places where I can, canonically, obtain additional relics for veneration and protection? > >Thank you for your time. ________________>
Hi again, I'm not sure why you haven't responded to my past emails. I was trying to clarify some untruths you have in your web site about the ICHR. I have heard that people are very upset about the statements you made and that there is a meeting today with a team of Canon lawyers to talk about many issues including your web site. I think the point is that they are upset that you did not state the facts. You put the ICHR in a bad and inaccurate light. I hope you do contact me so I may report to the others. There is no ill will intended by anyone, everyone just wants to stick with the true facts.
This report must not be reproduced â&#x20AC;&#x201C; This is a secure internal document