TRC Tablelands Regional Council - Agenda
Thursday 19 June 2014
It has been assessed against the relevant statutory planning instruments, including the Regional Plan and the Planning Scheme and is in conflict with some provisions of the relevant planning instrument, however, it is considered that there are sufficient grounds to approve the proposed development despite those conflicts. The key planning issues of the proposed development are the establishment of an industrial use within a rural zoning, limiting the scale and intensity of any approval, and the potential noise impacts on existing adjoining residence. The affected adjoining landowner has provided a letter of support for the proposed use. Draft conditions were provided to the Applicant/ care of their consultant and have been agreed. It is recommended that the application be approved subject to conditions.
OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION 1.
It is recommended that, in relation to the following development application:
APPLICANT
APPLICATION M & T McMullen
DATE LODGED TYPE OF APPROVAL PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
ADDRESS
6 February 2014 Development Permit
RPD
PREMISES 918 Kaban Road, Kaban Lot 1 on RP800584
Material Change of Use – Mechanical Repair Workshop (including Panel Beating & Spray Painting)
and in accordance with the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, as amended, the applicant be notified that the application for a development permit for the development specified in (A) is: Approved by Council in accordance with the approved plans/documents listed in (B), subject to assessment manager conditions in (C), assessment manager’s advice in (D), concurrence agency conditions in (E), relevant period in (F), further permits in (G), and further approvals from Council listed in (H); (A)
APPROVED DEVELOPMENT: Development Permit for a Material Change of Use – Mechanical Repair Workshop (including Panel Beating & Spray Painting)
And The assessment manager considers that the decision conflicts with some aspects of the relevant instruments. It is however considered that there are sufficient grounds to approve the proposed development despite the conflicts as identified below.
Page 128