Blekinge Jämtland Uppsala Kalmar Norrbotten Skåne Västra Götaland Stockholm Gotland Sörmland Dalarna SWEDEN Halland Örebro Kronoberg Jönköping Gävleborg Västerbotten Västernorrland Östergötland Värmland Västmanland
2.19 2.34 2.71 2.77 2.79 2.88 2.97 3.00 3.02 3.10 3.18 3.21 3.27 3.31 3.42 3.54 3.61 3.69 3.82 3.90 3.98 4.90 0
2
4
6
8 Percent
2006–2008
Figure 62
Adverse events within 30 days after knee and total hip arthroplasty, 2009–2011. Age-standardised. Source: National Patient Register, National Board of Health and Welfare
5
Percent
4 3
Total
2
Women
1
Men
0
Figure 62 Sweden
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Adverse events within 30 days after knee and total hip arthroplasty. Age-standardised. Source: National Patient Register, National Board of Health and Welfare
63 Patient-reported Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty The leading indicators for hip arthroplasty are subjective pain and poor healthrelated quality of life. Reporting these variables is essential to optimising treatment and quantifying results in multiple dimensions. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register has monitored patient-reported outcome of surgery since 2002. One of QUALITY AND EFFICIENCY IN SWEDISH HEALTH CARE 2012
131