Page 13

ance against FFT in the subject had any role to play in their selection of task. Links to performance in the subject: The following stats are from the entire option E cohort (74 students):
 56% of those who selected option 1 are below target
 22% of those who selected option 1 are above target
 22% of those who selected option 1 are on target
 


A Aiken
 K Donaldson
 S Pollard
 J Wale
 M Wilcox

8% of those who selected option 2 are below target
 23% of those who selected option 2 are on target
 69% of those who selected option 2 are above target 10% of those who selected Option 3 are below target
 70% of those who selected Option 3 are above target
 20% of those who selected Option 3 are on target These statistics are interesting as there appears to be a stronger correlation to perceived success in the subject determining option choice. 90% of those who selected option 3 are on or above their FFT target grade. As mentioned in the findings of phase i, there appears to be interconnection between mind-set, performance in subject and the choices students are making. The final area we needed to explore within the data created from their choices was the links to their ability.

‘...there appears to be a stronger correlation to perceived success in the subject determining option choice.’

Links to overall ability (FFT target grade): Option 1 – 44% of those who selected this option have a FFT target grade of a D or below
 Option 1 – 56% of those who selected this option have a FFT target grade of a B or C
 Nobody with an A*/A target selected option 1 Option 2 – 54% of those who selected this option have a FFT target grade of a D or below
 Option 2 – 46% of those who selected this option have a FFT target

12

Profile for SVCLessonStudy

Illumination: An Enlightened Enquiry  

Illumination: An Enlightened Enquiry  

Advertisement