Page 1

The Design of Engagements – III Srinivas Venkatram

Why must institutions be concerned about the “design of engagements”? The main reason is the challenge of “invoking people at scale”.

It is possible for a single individual to be highly engaged with the tasks and activities in front of him/ her. It is even possible for a leader to inspire a team to be highly engaged and involved with their work. But how to achieve the same behaviors and attitudes on a large scale, across thousands of people? How to measure such behaviors? How to create systems and processes that ensure that these behaviors are repeated predictably across time and circumstances?

Clearly the challenge of engagements is not at an individual or team level but at an institutional level. This is also seen in practice. In a hospital system, you have several committed doctors and likewise, several committed hospital staff like nurses and attendants. But you also have several cases of utter callousness to the patient, a focus on procedure at the cost of human concern, an inability to identify the non-medical challenges faced by patients and to address them effectively. You could set up processes to ensure delivery of several services to patients, but you may not be in a position to deliver superior ‘quality of engagement’ or predictable levels of interaction and responsiveness to the patients within the hospital.


The problem would get even more complicated if you were a government running several hospitals, with staff at fixed salaries, and catering to thousands of patients of all kinds and multiple

socio-economic

backgrounds,

across

numerous

locations, all being administered by a group of government officials. This challenge can be reframed in another way. It can be called the ‘richness versus reach’ challenge.

The richness versus reach challenge says that as you start increasing

volumes

in

people

and

interaction

intensive

businesses, the richness or quality of the interaction falls proportionally. This has implications in any human activity involving a large number

of

interactions

spread

over

several

(hundreds?

thousands? several hundreds of thousands?) of individuals. Government services, banking services, education, healthcare, customer services, call-centers… the list is endless.

An immediate reaction to the richness versus reach challenge is ‘technologization’ – can the technology be used to standardize interactions, or even better, eliminate the human element in interaction? The best example of this is the standardized delivery of several routine services in banking through ATMs and online banking services, which reduces the number of such interactions dramatically. This is true, but it is largely true where processes can be automated, ideas need to be communicated, or where the interactions themselves are very limited/ scoped due to their standardized routines. But this is not true when the human interaction has a creative element, or an emotional element, or a problem solving element,


or an element of counseling to the customer, or where the user/ customer’s involvement in the process can directly impact outcomes (e.g. education).

How big is the proportion of such services where human interaction is involved but technology may be able to deliver? The answer is: quite large. In fact, as routine services get technologized and are delivered seamlessly, customer and user expectations are rising and they seek services that can be provided even more customized and personalized, even more advice and guidance to help them deal with variety and complexity, and even more emotive content in an increasingly impersonal service ** environment. My first argument therefore is this: the richness versus reach problem is quite important, and will become even more important in the delivery of services. My second, more ** argument is this: if we can solve the richness versus reach challenges, then we might be able to transform “engagements” across society especially in areas like education, healthcare, counseling services of all kinds – leading to radical breakthroughs in terms of user-outcomes and engagement possibilities.

This is the potential value of ‘design of engagements’ – an opportunity

to

use

technology

to

deliver

standardized

interactions and ‘designed engagements’ to deliver breakthrough user/ customer outcomes

The design of engagements iii  
Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you