Bismillah hir Rehman nir Raheem ------------^^^^^^^^^^----------Assalat o Wasalam o Allika Ya RasoolALLAH

Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications (7th Ed)

Kenneth H. Rosen

Appendix + Index Published By: Muhammad Hassan Riaz Yousufi To Read Online & Download:

WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Kenneth H. Rosen

Discrete Mathematics and Its

Applications SEVENTH EDITION

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH

Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications Seventh Edition

Kenneth H. Rosen Monmouth University (and formerly AT&T Laboratories)

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH

DISCRETE MATHEMATICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, SEVENTH EDITION Published by McGraw-Hill, a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Previous editions © 2007, 2003, and 1999. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written consent of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., including, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning. Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the United States.

This book is printed on acid-free paper.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 DOW/DOW 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

ISBN 978-0-07-338309-5 MHID 0-07-338309-0

Vice President & Editor-in-Chief: Marty Lange Editorial Director: Michael Lange Global Publisher: Raghothaman Srinivasan Executive Editor: Bill Stenquist Development Editors: Lorraine K. Buczek/Rose Kernan Senior Marketing Manager: Curt Reynolds Project Manager: Robin A. Reed Buyer: Sandy Ludovissy Design Coordinator: Brenda A. Rolwes Cover painting: Jasper Johns, Between the Clock and the Bed, 1981. Oil on Canvas (72 × 126 1/4 inches) Collection of the artist. Photograph by Glenn Stiegelman. Cover Art © Jasper Johns/Licensed by VAGA, New York, NY Cover Designer: Studio Montage, St. Louis, Missouri Lead Photo Research Coordinator: Carrie K. Burger Media Project Manager: Tammy Juran Production Services/Compositor: RPK Editorial Services/PreTeX, Inc. Typeface: 10.5/12 Times Roman Printer: R.R. Donnelley

All credits appearing on this page or at the end of the book are considered to be an extension of the copyright page. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rosen, Kenneth H. Discrete mathematics and its applications / Kenneth H. Rosen. — 7th ed. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 0–07–338309–0 1. Mathematics. 2. Computer science—Mathematics. I. Title. QA39.3.R67 2012 511–dc22 2011011060 www.mhhe.com

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH

Contents About the Author vi Preface vii The Companion Website xvi To the Student xvii

1

The Foundations: Logic and Proofs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8

Propositional Logic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Applications of Propositional Logic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Propositional Equivalences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Predicates and Quantifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Nested Quantifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 Rules of Inference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Introduction to Proofs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 Proof Methods and Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 End-of-Chapter Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109

2

Basic Structures: Sets, Functions, Sequences, Sums, and Matrices . 115

2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6

Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 Set Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 Sequences and Summations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 Cardinality of Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 Matrices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 End-of-Chapter Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185

3

Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191

3.1 3.2 3.3

Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191 The Growth of Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 Complexity of Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 End-of-Chapter Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232

4

Number Theory and Cryptography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237

4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6

Divisibility and Modular Arithmetic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 Integer Representations and Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245 Primes and Greatest Common Divisors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257 Solving Congruences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274 Applications of Congruences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287 Cryptography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 End-of-Chapter Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306 iii

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH iv

Contents

5

Induction and Recursion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311

5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5

Mathematical Induction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311 Strong Induction and Well-Ordering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333 Recursive Definitions and Structural Induction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 344 Recursive Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 Program Correctness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372 End-of-Chapter Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377

6

Counting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385

6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6

The Basics of Counting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385 The Pigeonhole Principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399 Permutations and Combinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 407 Binomial Coefficients and Identities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 415 Generalized Permutations and Combinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 423 Generating Permutations and Combinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 434 End-of-Chapter Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 439

7

Discrete Probability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445

7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4

An Introduction to Discrete Probability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445 Probability Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452 Bayes’ Theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 468 Expected Value and Variance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477 End-of-Chapter Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494

8

Advanced Counting Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501

8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6

Applications of Recurrence Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501 Solving Linear Recurrence Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514 Divide-and-Conquer Algorithms and Recurrence Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 527 Generating Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 537 Inclusion–Exclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 552 Applications of Inclusion–Exclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 558 End-of-Chapter Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 565

9

Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 573

9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6

Relations and Their Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 573 n-ary Relations and Their Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 583 Representing Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 591 Closures of Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 597 Equivalence Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 607 Partial Orderings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 618 End-of-Chapter Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 633

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Contents v

10

Graphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 641

10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8

Graphs and Graph Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 641 Graph Terminology and Special Types of Graphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 651 Representing Graphs and Graph Isomorphism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 668 Connectivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 678 Euler and Hamilton Paths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 693 Shortest-Path Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 707 Planar Graphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 718 Graph Coloring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 End-of-Chapter Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 735

11

Trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 745

11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5

Introduction to Trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 745 Applications of Trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 757 Tree Traversal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 772 Spanning Trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 785 Minimum Spanning Trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 797 End-of-Chapter Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 803

12

Boolean Algebra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811

12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4

Boolean Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 Representing Boolean Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 819 Logic Gates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 822 Minimization of Circuits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 End-of-Chapter Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 843

13

Modeling Computation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847

13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5

Languages and Grammars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847 Finite-State Machines with Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 858 Finite-State Machines with No Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 Language Recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Turing Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 888 End-of-Chapter Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 899

Appendixes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 1 2 3

Axioms for the Real Numbers and the Positive Integers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Exponential and Logarithmic Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Pseudocode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Suggested Readings B-1 Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-1 Photo Credits C-1 Index of Biographies I-1 Index I-2

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah Rehman A P Phiir E N D I X nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH

1

Axioms for the Real Numbers and the Positive Integers

I

n this book we have assumed an explicit set of axioms for the set of real numbers and for the set of positive integers. In this appendix we will list these axioms and we will illustrate how basic facts, also used without proof in the text, can be derived using them.

Axioms for Real Numbers The standard axioms for real numbers include both the field (or algebraic) axioms, used to specify rules for basic arithmetic operations, and the order axioms, used to specify properties of the ordering of real numbers. THE FIELD AXIOMS We begin with the field axioms. As usual, we denote the sum and

product of two real numbers x and y by x + y and x · y, respectively. (Note that the product of x and y is often denoted by xy without the use of the dot to indicate multiplication. We will not use this abridged notation in this appendix, but will within the text.) Also, by convention, we perform multiplications before additions unless parentheses are used. Although these statements are axioms, they are commonly called laws or rules. The first two of these axioms tell us that when we add or multiply two real numbers, the result is again a real number; these are the closure laws.

Closure law for addition For all real numbers x and y, x + y is a real number. Closure law for multiplication For all real numbers x and y, x · y is a real number.

The next two axioms tell us that when we add or multiply three real numbers, we get the same result regardless of the order of operations; these are the associative laws. Associative law for addition For all real numbers x, y, and z, (x + y) + z = x + (y + z). Associative law for multiplication For all real numbers x, y, and z, (x · y) · z = x · (y · z).

Two additional algebraic axioms tell us that the order in which we add or multiply two numbers does not matter; these are the commutative laws. Commutative law for addition For all real numbers x and y, x + y = y + x. Commutative law for multiplication For all real numbers x and y, x · y = y · x.

The next two axioms tell us that 0 and 1 are additive and multiplicative identities for the set of real numbers. That is, when we add 0 to a real number or multiply a real number by 1 we do not change this real number. These laws are called identity laws.

Additive identity law For every real number x, x + 0 = 0 + x = x. Multiplicative identity law For every real number x, x · 1 = 1 · x = x. Although it seems obvious, we also need the following axiom.

Identity elements axiom distinct, that is 0 = 1.

The additive identity 0 and the multiplicative identity 1 are A-1

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH A-2

Appendix 1 / Axioms for the Real Numbers and the Positive Integers

Two additional axioms tell us that for every real number, there is a real number that can be added to this number to produce 0, and for every nonzero real number, there is a real number by which it can be multiplied to produce 1. These are the inverse laws. Inverse law for addition For every real number x, there exists a real number −x (called the additive inverse of x) such that x + (−x) = (−x) + x = 0. Inverse law for multiplication For every nonzero real number x, there exists a real number 1/x (called the multiplicative inverse of x) such that x · (1/x) = (1/x) · x = 1.

The final algebraic axioms for real numbers are the distributive laws, which tell us that multiplication distributes over addition; that is, that we obtain the same result when we first add a pair of real numbers and then multiply by a third real number or when we multiply each of these two real numbers by the third real number and then add the two products.

Distributive laws For all real numbers x, y, and z, x · (y + z) = x · y + x · z and (x + y) · z = x · z + y · z.

ORDER AXIOMS Next, we will state the order axioms for the real numbers, which specify

properties of the “greater than” relation, denoted by >, on the set of real numbers. We write x > y (and y < x) when x is greater than y, and we write x ≥ y (and y ≤ x) when x > y or x = y. The first of these axioms tells us that given two real numbers, exactly one of three possibilities occurs: the two numbers are equal, the first is greater than the second, or the second is greater than the first. This rule is called the trichotomy law.

Trichotomy law For all real numbers x and y, exactly one of x = y, x > y, or y > x is true.

Next, we have an axiom, called the transitivity law, that tells us that if one number is greater than a second number and this second number is greater than a third, then the first number is greater than the third.

Transitivity law For all real numbers x, y, and z, if x > y and y > z, then x > z.

We also have two compatibility laws, which tell us that when we add a number to both sides in a greater than relationship, the greater than relationship is preserved and when we multiply both sides of a greater than relationship by a positive real number (that is, a real number x with x > 0), the greater than relationship is preserved. Additive compatibility law For all real numbers x, y, and z, if x > y, then x + z > y + z. Multiplicative compatibility law For all real numbers x, y, and z, if x > y and z > 0, then x · z > y · z.

We leave it to the reader (see Exercise 15) to prove that for all real numbers x, y, and z, if x > y and z < 0, then x · z < y · z. That is, multiplication of an inequality by a negative real number reverses the direction of the inequality. The final axiom for the set of real numbers is the completeness property. Before we state this axiom, we need some definitions. First, given a nonempty set A of real numbers, we say that the real number b is an upper bound of A if for every real number a in A, b ≥ a. A real number s is a least upper bound of A if s is an upper bound of A and whenever t is an upper bound of A, then we have s ≤ t.

Completeness property Every nonempty set of real numbers that is bounded above has a least upper bound.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Appendix 1 / Axioms for the Real Numbers and the Positive Integers A-3

Using Axioms to Prove Basic Facts The axioms we have listed can be used to prove many properties that are often used without explicit mention. We give several examples of results we can prove using axioms and leave the proof of a variety of other properties as exercises. Although the results we will prove seem quite obvious, proving them using only the axioms we have stated can be challenging.

THEOREM 1

The additive identity element 0 of the real numbers is unique. Proof: To show that the additive identity element 0 of the real numbers is unique, suppose that 0 is also an additive identity for the real numbers. This means that 0 + x = x + 0 = x whenever x is a real number. By the additive identity law, it follows that 0 + 0 = 0 . Because 0 is an additive identity, we know that 0 + 0 = 0. It follows that 0 = 0 , because both equal 0 + 0 . This shows that 0 is the unique additive identity for the real numbers.

THEOREM 2

The additive inverse of a real number x is unique. Proof: Let x be a real number. Suppose that y and z are both additive inverses of x. Then, y =0+y = (z + x) + y = z + (x + y) =z+0 =z

by the additive identity law because z is an additive inverse of x by the associative law for addition because y is an additive inverse of x by the additive identity law.

It follows that y = z. Theorems 1 and 2 tell us that the additive identity and additive inverses are unique. Theorems 3 and 4 tell us that the multiplicative identity and multiplicative inverses of nonzero real numbers are also unique. We leave their proofs as exercises.

THEOREM 3

The multiplicative identity element 1 of the real numbers is unique.

THEOREM 4

The multiplicative inverse of a nonzero real number x is unique.

THEOREM 5

For every real number x, x · 0 = 0.

Proof: Suppose that x is a real number. By the additive inverse law, there is a real number y that is the additive inverse of x · 0, so we have x · 0 + y = 0. By the additive identity law, 0 + 0 = 0. Using the distributive law, we see that x · 0 = x · (0 + 0) = x · 0 + x · 0. It follows that 0 = x · 0 + y = (x · 0 + x · 0) + y.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH A-4

Appendix 1 / Axioms for the Real Numbers and the Positive Integers

Next, note that by the associative law for addition and because x · 0 + y = 0, it follows that (x · 0 + x · 0) + y = x · 0 + (x · 0 + y) = x · 0 + 0. Finally, by the additive identity law, we know that x · 0 + 0 = x · 0. Consequently, x · 0 = 0.

THEOREM 6

For all real numbers x and y, if x · y = 0, then x = 0 or y = 0. Proof: Suppose that x and y are real numbers and x · y = 0. If x = 0, then, by the multiplicative inverse law, x has a multiplicative inverse 1/x, such that x · (1/x) = (1/x) · x = 1. Because x · y = 0, we have (1/x) · (x · y) = (1/x) · 0 = 0 by Theorem 5. Using the associate law for multiplication, we have ((1/x) · x) · y = 0. This means that 1 · y = 0. By the multiplicative identity rule, we see that 1 · y = y, so y = 0. Consequently, either x = 0 or y = 0.

THEOREM 7

The multiplicative identity element 1 in the set of real numbers is greater than the additive identity element 0. Proof: By the trichotomy law, either 0 = 1, 0 > 1, or 1 > 0. We know by the identity elements axiom that 0 = 1. So, assume that 0 > 1. We will show that this assumption leads to a contradiction. By the additive inverse law, 1 has an additive inverse −1 with 1 + (−1) = 0. The additive compatibility law tells us that 0 + (−1) > 1 + (−1) = 0; the additive identity law tells us that 0 + (−1) = −1. Consequently, −1 > 0, and by the multiplicative compatibility law, (−1) · (−1) > (−1) · 0. By Theorem 5 the right-hand side of last inequality is 0. By the distributive law, (−1) · (−1) + (−1) · 1 = (−1) · (−1 + 1) = (−1) · 0 = 0. Hence, the left-hand side of this last inequality, (−1) · (−1), is the unique additive inverse of −1, so this side of the inequality equals 1. Consequently this last inequality becomes 1 > 0, contradicting the trichotomy law because we had assumed that 0 > 1. Because we know that 0 = 1 and that it is impossible for 0 > 1, by the trichotomy law, we conclude that 1 > 0.

ARCHIMEDES (287 b.c.e.–212 b.c.e.) Archimedes was one of the greatest scientists and mathematicians of ancient times. He was born in Syracuse, a Greek city-state in Sicily. His father, Phidias, was an astronomer. Archimedes was educated in Alexandria, Egypt. After completing his studies, he returned to Syracuse, where he spent the rest of his life. Little is known about his personal life; we do not know whether he was ever married or had children. Archimedes was killed in 212 b.c.e. by a Roman soldier when the Romans overran Syracuse. Archimedes made many important discoveries in geometry. His method for computing the area under a curve was described two thousand years before his ideas were re-invented as part of integral calculus.Archimedes also developed a method for expressing large integers inexpressible by the usual Greek method. He discovered a method for computing the volume of a sphere, as well as of other solids, and he calculated an approximation of π . Archimedes was also an accomplished engineer and inventor; his machine for pumping water, now called Archimedes’ screw, is still in use today. Perhaps his best known discovery is the principle of buoyancy, which tells us that an object submerged in liquid becomes lighter by an amount equal to the weight it displaces. Some histories tell us that Archimedes was an early streaker, running naked through the streets of Syracuse shouting “Eureka” (which means “I have found it”) when he made this discovery. He is also known for his clever use of machines that held off Roman forces sieging Syracuse for several years during the Second Punic War.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Appendix 1 / Axioms for the Real Numbers and the Positive Integers A-5

The next theorem tells us that for every real number there is an integer (where by an integer, we mean 0, the sum of any number of 1s, and the additive inverses of these sums) greater than this real number. This result is attributed to the Greek mathematician Archimedes. The result can be found in Book V of Euclid’s Elements.

THEOREM 8

ARCHIMEDEAN PROPERTY that n > x.

For every real number x there exists an integer n such

Proof: Suppose that x is a real number such that n ≤ x for every integer n. Then x is an upper bound of the set of integers. By the completeness property it follows that the set of integers has a least upper bound M. Because M − 1 < M and M is a least upper bound of the set of integers, M − 1 is not an upper bound of the set of integers. This means that there is an integer n with n > M − 1. This implies that n + 1 > M, contradicting the fact that M is an upper bound of the set of integers.

Axioms for the Set of Positive Integers The axioms we now list specify the set of positive integers as the subset of the set of integers satisfying four key properties. We assume the truth of these axioms in this textbook.

Axiom 1 The number 1 is a positive integer. Axiom 2 If n is a positive integer, then n + 1, the successor of n, is also a positive integer. Axiom 3 Every positive integer other than 1 is the successor of a positive integer. Axiom 4 The Well-Ordering Property Every nonempty subset of the set of positive integers has a least element.

In Sections 5.1 and 5.2 it is shown that the well-ordering principle is equivalent to the principle of mathematical induction.

Mathematical induction axiom If S is a set of positive integers such that 1 ∈ S and for all positive integers n if n ∈ S, then n + 1 ∈ S, then S is the set of positive integers.

Most mathematicians take the real number system as already existing, with the real numbers satisfying the axioms we have listed in this appendix. However, mathematicians in the nineteenth century developed techniques to construct the set of real numbers, starting with more basic sets of numbers. (The process of constructing the real numbers is sometimes studied in advanced undergraduate mathematics classes. A treatment of this can be found in [Mo91], for instance.) The first step in the process is the construction of the set of positive integers using axioms 1–3 and either the well-ordering property or the mathematical induction axiom. Then, the operations of addition and multiplication of positive integers are defined. Once this has been done, the set of integers can be constructed using equivalence classes of pairs of positive integers where (a, b) ∼ (c, d) if and only if a + d = b + c; addition and multiplication of integers can be defined using these pairs (see Exercise 21). (Equivalence relations and equivalence classes are discussed in Chapter 9.) Next, the set of rational numbers can be constructed using the equivalence classes of pairs of integers where the second integer in the pair is not zero, where (a, b) ≈ (c, d) if and only if a · d = b · c; addition and multiplication of rational numbers can be defined in terms of these pairs (see Exercise 22). Using infinite sequences, the set of real numbers can then be constructed from the set of rational numbers. The interested reader will find it worthwhile to read through the many details of the steps of this construction.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH A-6

Appendix 1 / Axioms for the Real Numbers and the Positive Integers

Exercises Use only the axioms and theorems in this appendix in the proofs in your answers to these exercises. 1. Prove Theorem 3, which states that the multiplicative identity element of the real numbers is unique. 2. Prove Theorem 4, which states that for every nonzero real number x, the multiplicative inverse of x is unique. 3. Prove that for all real numbers x and y, (−x) · y = x · (−y) = −(x · y). 4. Prove that for all real numbers x and y, −(x + y) = (−x) + (−y). 5. Prove that for all real numbers x and y, (−x) · (−y) = x · y. 6. Prove that for all real numbers x, y, and z, if x + z = y + z, then x = y. 7. Prove that for every real number x, −(−x) = x. Define the difference x − y of real numbers x and y by x − y = x + (−y), where −y is the additive inverse of y, and the quotient x/y, where y = 0, by x/y = x · (1/y), where 1/y is the multiplicative inverse of y. 8. Prove that for all real numbers x and y, x = y if and only if x − y = 0. 9. Prove that for all real numbers x and y, −x − y = −(x + y). 10. Prove that for all nonzero real numbers x and y, 1/(x/y) = y/x, where 1/(x/y) is the multiplicative inverse of x/y. 11. Prove that for all real numbers w, x, y, and z, if x = 0 and z = 0, then (w/x) + (y/z) = (w · z + x · y)/(x · z). 12. Prove that for every positive real number x, 1/x is also a positive real number. 13. Prove that for all positive real numbers x and y, x · y is also a positive real number.

14. Prove that for all real numbers x and y, if x > 0 and y < 0, then x · y < 0. 15. Prove that for all real numbers x, y, and z, if x > y and z < 0, then x · z < y · z. 16. Prove that for every real number x, x = 0 if and only if x 2 > 0. 17. Prove that for all real numbers w, x, y, and z, if w < x and y < z, then w + y < x + z. 18. Prove that for all positive real numbers x and y, if x < y, then 1/x > 1/y. 19. Prove that for every positive real number x, there exists a positive integer n such that n · x > 1. ∗ 20. Prove that between every two distinct real numbers there is a rational number (that is, a number of the form x/y, where x and y are integers with y = 0). Exercises 21 and 22 involve the notion of an equivalence relation, discussed in Chapter 9 of the text. ∗ 21. Define a relation ∼ on the set of ordered pairs of positive integers by (w, x) ∼ (y, z) if and only if w + z = x + y. Show that the operations [(w, x)]∼ + [(y, z)]∼ = [(w + y, x + z)]∼ and [(w, x)]∼ · [(y, z)]∼ = [(w · y + x · z, x · y + w · z)]∼ are well-defined, that is, they do not depend on the representative of the equivalence classes chosen for the computation. ∗ 22. Define a relation ≈ on ordered pairs of integers with second entry nonzero by (w, x) ≈ (y, z) if and only if w · z = x · y. Show that the operations [(w, x)]≈ + [(y, z)]≈ = [(w·z + x ·y, x ·z)]≈ and [(w, x)]≈ · [(y, z)]≈ = [(w·y, x · z)]≈ are well-defined, that is, they do not depend on the representative of the equivalence classes chosen for the computation.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah Rehman A P Phiir E N D I X nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH

2

Exponential and Logarithmic Functions

I

n this appendix we review some of the basic properties of exponential functions and logarithms. These properties are used throughout the text. Students requiring further review of this material should consult precalculus or calculus books, such as those mentioned in the Suggested Readings.

Exponential Functions Let n be a positive integer, and let b be a fixed positive real number. The function fb (n) = bn is defined by fb (n) = bn = b · b · b · · · · · b, where there are n factors of b multiplied together on the right-hand side of the equation. We can define the function fb (x) = bx for all real numbers x using techniques from calculus. The function fb (x) = bx is called the exponential function to the base b. We will not discuss how to find the values of exponential functions to the base b when x is not an integer. Two of the important properties satisfied by exponential functions are given in Theorem 1. Proofs of these and other related properties can be found in calculus texts.

THEOREM 1

Let b be a positive real number and x and y real numbers. Then 1. bx+y = bx by , and 2. (bx )y = bxy . We display the graphs of some exponential functions in Figure 1.

Logarithmic Functions Suppose that b is a real number with b > 1. Then the exponential function bx is strictly increasing (a fact shown in calculus). It is a one-to-one correspondence from the set of real numbers to the set of nonnegative real numbers. Hence, this function has an inverse logb x, called the logarithmic function to the base b. In other words, if b is a real number greater than 1 and x is a positive real number, then blogb x = x. The value of this function at x is called the logarithm of x to the base b. From the definition, it follows that logb bx = x. We give several important properties of logarithms in Theorem 2. A-7

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH A-8

Appendix 2 / Exponential and Logarithmic Functions

y 10 9 y = 5x

8 7 6

y = 2x

5 4 3 2

y= 1 2

1

x

x 0

1

FIGURE 1

THEOREM 2

2

Graphs of the Exponential Functions to the Bases 21 , 2, and 5.

Let b be a real number greater than 1. Then 1. logb (xy) = logb x + logb y whenever x and y are positive real numbers, and 2. logb (x y ) = y logb x whenever x is a positive real number and y is a real number. Proof: Because logb (xy) is the unique real number with blogb (xy) = xy, to prove part 1 it suffices to show that blogb x+logb y = xy. By part 1 of Theorem 1, we have blogb x+logb y = blogb x blogb y = xy. To prove part 2, it suffices to show that by logb x = x y . By part 2 of Theorem 1, we have by logb x = (blogb x )y = xy . The following theorem relates logarithms to two different bases.

THEOREM 3

Let a and b be real numbers greater than 1, and let x be a positive real number. Then loga x = logb x/logb a. Proof: To prove this result, it suffices to show that bloga x 路 logb a = x.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Appendix 2 / Exponential and Logarithmic Functions A-9

y 3

2 y = log x

1

x 1

2

3

4

5

FIGURE 2 The Graph of f (x) = log x. By part 2 of Theorem 1, we have bloga x 路 logb a = (blogb a )loga x = a loga x = x. This completes the proof. Because the base used most often for logarithms in this text is b = 2, the notation log x is used throughout the test to denote log2 x. The graph of the function f (x) = log x is displayed in Figure 2. From Theorem 3, when a base b other than 2 is used, a function that is a constant multiple of the function log x, namely, (1/ log b) log x, is obtained.

Exercises 1. Express each of the following quantities as powers of 2. a) 2 路 22

b) (22 )3

c) 2

(22 )

2. Find each of the following quantities. a) log2 1024 b) log2 1/4 c) log4 8 3. Suppose that log4 x = y where x is a positive real number. Find each of the following quantities. a) log2 x b) log8 x c) log16 x

4. Let a, b, and c be positive real numbers. Show that a logb c = clogb a . 5. Draw the graph of f (x) = bx for all real numbers x if b is a) 3. b) 1/3. c) 1. 6. Draw the graph of f (x) = logb x for positive real numbers x if b is a) 4. b) 100. c) 1000.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah Rehman A P Phiir E N D I X nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH

3

Pseudocode

T

he algorithms in this text are described both in English and in pseudocode. Pseudocode is an intermediate step between an English language description of the steps of a procedure and a specification of this procedure using an actual programming language. The advantages of using pseudocode include the simplicity with which it can be written and understood and the ease of producing actual computer code (in a variety of programming languages) from the pseudocode. We will describe the particular types of statements, or high-level instructions, of the pseudocode that we will use. Each of these statements in pseudocode can be translated into one or more statements in a particular programming language, which in turn can be translated into one or more (possibly many) low-level instructions for a computer. This appendix describes the format and syntax of the pseudocode used in the text. This pseudocode is designed so that its basic structure resembles that of commonly used programming languages, such as C++ and Java, which are currently the most commonly taught programming languages. However, the pseudocode we use will be a lot looser than a formal programming language because a lot of English language descriptions of steps will be allowed. This appendix is not meant for formal study. Rather, it should serve as a reference guide for students when they study the descriptions of algorithms given in the text and when they write pseudocode solutions to exercises.

Procedure Statements The pseudocode for an algorithm begins with a procedure statement that gives the name of an algorithm, lists the input variables, and describes what kind of variable each input is. For instance, the statement

procedure maximum(L: list of integers) is the first statement in the pseudocode description of the algorithm, which we have named maximum, that finds the maximum of a list L of integers.

Assignments and Other Types of Statements An assignment statement is used to assign values to variables. In an assignment statement the left-hand side is the name of the variable and the right-hand side is an expression that involves constants, variables that have been assigned values, or functions defined by procedures. The right-hand side may contain any of the usual arithmetic operations. However, in the pseudocode in this book it may include any well-defined operation, even if this operation can be carried out only by using a large number of statements in an actual programming language. The symbol := is used for assignments. Thus, an assignment statement has the form variable := expression

A-11

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH A-12

Appendix 3 / Pseudocode

For example, the statement

max := a assigns the value of a to the variable max. A statement such as x := largest integer in the list L can also be used. This sets x equal to the largest integer in the list L. To translate this statement into an actual programming language would require more than one statement. Also, the instruction

interchange a and b can be used to interchange a and b. We could also express this one statement with several assignment statements (see Exercise 2), but for simplicity, we will often prefer this abbreviated form of pseudocode.

Comments In the pseudocode in this book, statements enclosed in curly braces are not executed. Such statements serve as comments or reminders that help explain how the procedure works. For instance, the statement

{x is the largest element in L} can be used to remind the reader that at that point in the procedure the variable x equals the largest element in the list L.

Conditional Constructions The simplest form of the conditional construction that we will use is

if condition then statement or

if condition then block of statements

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Appendix 3 / Pseudocode A-13

Here, the condition is checked, and if it is true, then the statement or block of statements given is carried out. In particular, the pseudocode

if condition then statement 1 statement 2 statement 3 · · · statement n

tells us that the statements in the block are executed sequentially if the condition is true. For example, in Algorithm 1 in Section 3.1, which finds the maximum of a set of integers, we use a conditional statement to check whether max < ai for each variable; if it is, we assign the value of ai to max. Often, we require the use of a more general type of construction. This is used when we wish to do one thing when the indicated condition is true, but another when it is false. We use the construction

if condition then statement 1 else statement 2

Note that either one or both of statement 1 and statement 2 can be replaced with a block of statements. Sometimes, we require the use of an even more general form of a conditional. The general form of the conditional construction that we will use is

if condition 1 then statement 1 else if condition 2 then statement 2 else if condition 3 then statement 3 · · · else if condition n then statement n else statement n + 1

When this construction is used, if condition 1 is true, then statement 1 is carried out, and the program exits this construction. In addition, if condition 1 is false, the program checks whether condition 2 is true; if it is, statement 2 is carried out, and so on. Thus, if none of the first n − 1 conditions hold, but condition n does, statement n is carried out. Finally, if none of condition 1, condition 2, condition 3, . . . , condition n is true, then statement n + 1 is executed. Note that any of the n + 1 statements can be replaced by a block of statements.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH A-14

Appendix 3 / Pseudocode

Loop Constructions There are two types of loop construction in the pseudocode in this book. The first is the “for” construction, which has the form for variable := initial value to final value statement or for variable := initial value to final value block of statements where initial value and final value are integers. Here, at the start of the loop, variable is assigned initial value if initial value is less than or equal to final value, and the statements at the end of this construction are carried out with this value of variable. Then variable is increased by one, and the statement, or the statements in the block, are carried out with this new value of variable. This is repeated until variable reaches final value. After the instructions are carried out with variable equal to final value, the algorithm proceeds to the next statement. When initial value exceeds final value, none of the statements in the loop is executed. We can use the “for” loop construction to find the sum of the positive integers from 1 to n with the following pseudocode. sum := 0 for i := 1 to n sum := sum + i Also, the more general “for” statement, of the form for all elements with a certain property is used in this text. This means that the statement or block of statements that follow are carried out successively for the elements with the given property. The second type of loop construction that we will use is the “while” construction. This has the form while condition statement or while condition block of statements When this construction is used, the condition given is checked, and if it is true, the statements that follow are carried out, which may change the values of the variables that are part of the condition.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Appendix 3 / Pseudocode A-15

If the condition is still true after these instructions have been carried out, the instructions are carried out again. This is repeated until the condition becomes false. As an example, we can find the sum of the integers from 1 to n using the following block of pseudocode including a “while” construction. sum := 0 while n > 0 sum := sum + n n := n − 1 Note that any “for” construction can be turned into a “while” construction (see Exercise 3). However, it is often easier to understand the “for” construction. So, when it makes sense, we will use the “for” construction in preference to the corresponding “while” construction.

Loops within Loops Loops or conditional statements are often used within other loops or conditional statements. In the pseudocode used in this book, we use successive levels of indentation to indicate nested loops, which are loops within loops, and which blocks of commands correspond to which loops.

Using Procedures in Other Procedures We can use a procedure from within another procedure (or within itself in a recursive program) simply by writing the name of this procedure followed by the inputs to this procedure. For instance, max(L) will carry out the procedure max with the input list L. After all the steps of this procedure have been carried out, execution carries on with the next statement in the procedure.

Return Statements We use a return statement to show where a procedure produces output. A return statement of the form return x produces the current value of x as output. The output x can involve the value of one or more functions, including the same function under evaluation, but at a smaller value. For instance, the statement return f (n − 1) is used to call the algorithm with input of n − 1. This means that the algorithm is run again with input equal to n − 1.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH A-16

Appendix 3 / Pseudocode

Exercises 1. What is the difference between the following blocks of two assignment statements? a := b b := c

2. Give a procedure using assignment statements to interchange the values of the variables x and y. What is the minimum number of assignment statements needed to do this? 3. Show how a loop of the form for i := initial value to final value statement

and b := c a := b

can be written using the â€œwhileâ€? construction.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Suggested Reading

A

mong the resources available for learning more about the topics covered in this book are printed materials and relevant websites. Printed resources are described in this section of suggested readings. Readings are listed by chapter and keyed to particular topics of interest. Some general references also deserve special mention. A book you may find particularly useful is the Handbook of Discrete and Combinatorial Mathematics by Rosen [Ro00], a comprehensive reference book. Additional applications of discrete mathematics can be found in Michaels and Rosen [MiRo91], which is also available online on the companion website for this book. Deeper coverage of many topics in computer science, including those discussed in this book, can be found in Gruska [Gr97]. Biographical information about many of the mathematicians and computer scientists mentioned in this book can be found in Gillispie [Gi70] and on the MacTutor website at http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/ . To find pertinent websites, consult the links found in the Web Resources Guide on the companion website for this book. Its address is www.mhhe.com/rosen.

CHAPTER 1 An entertaining way to study logic is to read Lewis Carroll’s book [Ca78]. General references for logic include M. Huth and M. Ryan [HuRy04], Mendelson [Me09], Stoll [St74], and Suppes [Su87]. A comprehensive treatment of logic in discrete mathematics can be found in Gries and Schneider [GrSc93]. System specifications are discussed in Ince [In93]. Smullyan’s knights and knaves puzzles were introduced in [Sm78]. He has written many fascinating books on logic puzzles including [Sm92] and [Sm98]. Prolog is discussed in depth in Nilsson and Maluszynski [NiMa95] and in Clocksin and Mellish [ClMe94]. The basics of proofs are covered in Cupillari [Cu05], Morash [Mo91], Solow [So09], Velleman [Ve06], and Wolf [Wo98]. The science and art of constructing proofs is discussed in a delightful way in three books by Pólya: [Po62], [Po71], and [Po90]. Problems involving tiling checkerboards using dominoes and polyominoes are discussed in Golomb [Go94] and Martin [Ma91].

CHAPTER 2 Lin and Lin [LiLi81] is an easily read text on sets and their applications. Axiomatic developments of set theory can be found in Halmos [Ha60], Monk [Mo69], and Stoll [St74]. Brualdi [Br09], and Reingold, Nievergelt, and Deo [ReNiDe77] contain introductions to multisets. Fuzzy sets and their application to expert systems and artificial intelligence are treated in Negoita [Ne85] and Zimmerman [Zi91]. Calculus books, such as Apostol [Ap67], Spivak [Sp94], and Thomas and Finney [ThFi96], contain discussions of functions. The best printed source of information about integer sequences is Sloan and Plouffe [SlPl95]. Books on proofs, such as [Ve06], often cover countability in some depth. Stanat and McAllister [StMc77] has a thorough section on countability. Chapter 17 of Aigner, Ziegler, and Hoffman [AiZiHo09] provides an excellent discussion of cardinality and the continuum hypothesis.

Discussions of the mathematical foundations needed for computer science can be found in Arbib, Kfoury, and Moll [ArKfMo80], Bobrow and Arbib [BoAr74], Beckman [Be80], and Tremblay and Manohar [TrMa75]. Matrices and their operations are covered in all linear algebra books, such as Curtis [Cu84] and Strang [St09].

CHAPTER 3 The articles by Knuth [Kn77] and Wirth [Wi84] are accessible introductions to the subject of algorithms. Among the best introductions to algorithms are Cormen, Leierson, Rivest, and Stein [CoLeRiSt09] and Kleinberg and Tardos [KlTa05]. Extensive material on big-O estimates of functions can be found in Knuth [Kn97a]. General references for algorithms and their complexity include Aho, Hopcroft, and Ullman [AhHoUl74]; Baase and Van Gelder [BaGe99]; Cormen, Leierson, Rivest, and Stein [CoLeRiSt09]; Gonnet [Go84]; Goodman and Hedetniemi [GoHe77]; Harel [Ha87]; Horowitz and Sahni [HoSa82]; Kreher and Stinson [KrSt98]; the famous series of books by Knuth on the art of computer programming [Kn97a], [Kn97b], and [Kn98]; Kronsjö [Kr87]; Levitin [Le06]; Manber [Ma89]; Pohl and Shaw [PoSh81]; Purdom and Brown [PuBr85]; Rawlins [Ra92]; Sedgewick [Se03]; Wilf [Wi02]; and Wirth [Wi76]. Sorting and searching algorithms and their complexity are studied in detail in Knuth [Kn98].

CHAPTER 4 References for number theory include Hardy and Wright [HaWrWiHe08]; LeVeque [Le77]; Rosen [Ro10]; and Stark [St78]. More about the history of number theory can be found in Ore [Or88]. Algorithms for computer arithmetic are discussed in Knuth [Kn97b] and Pohl and Shaw [PoSh81]. More information about algorithms for finding primes and for factorization can be found in Crandall B-1

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH B-2

Suggested Reading

and Pomerance [CrPo10]. Applications of number theory to cryptography are covered in Denning [De82]; Menezes, van Oorschot, and Vanstone [MeOoVa97]; Rosen [Ro10]; Seberry and Pieprzyk [SePi89]; Sinkov [Si66]; and Stinson [St05]. The RSA publickey system was described by Rivest, Shamir, and Adleman in [RiShAd78]; its discovery by Cocks is described in [Si99], which also provides an appealing account of the history of cryptography.

CHAPTER 5 An accessible introduction to mathematical induction can be found [Gu10] and in Sominskii [So61]. Books that contain thorough treatments of mathematical induction and recursive definitions include Liu [Li85]; Sahni [Sa85]; Stanat and McAllister [StMc77]; and Tremblay and Manohar [TrMa75]. Computational geometry is covered in [DeOr11] and [Or00]. The Ackermann function, introduced in 1928 by W. Ackermann, arises in the theory of recursive function (see Beckman [Be80] and McNaughton [Mc82], for instance) and in the analysis of the complexity of certain set theoretic algorithms (see Tarjan [Ta83]). Recursion is studied in Roberts [Ro86]; Rohl [Ro84]; and Wand [Wa80]. Discussions of program correctness and the logical machinery used to prove that programs are correct can be found in Alagic and Arbib [AlAr78]; Anderson [An79]; Backhouse [Ba86]; Sahni [Sa85]; and Stanat and McAllister [StMc77].

CHAPTER 6 General references for counting techniques and their applications includeAllenby and Slomson [AlSl10];Anderson [An89]; Berman and Fryer [BeFr72]; Bogart [Bo00]; Bona [Bo07]; Bose and Manvel [BoMa86]; Brualdi [Br09]; Cohen [Co78]; Grimaldi [Gr03]; Gross [Gr07]; Liu [Li68]; Pólya, Tarjan, and Woods [PoTaWo83]; Riordan [Ri58]; Roberts and Tesman [RoTe03]; Tucker [Tu06]; and Williamson [Wi85]. Vilenkin [Vi71] contains a selection of combinatorial problems and their solutions. A selection of more difficult combinatorial problems can be found in Lovász [Lo79]. Information about Internet protocol addresses and datagrams can be found in Comer [Co05]. Applications of the pigeonhole principle can be found in Brualdi [Br09]; Liu [Li85]; and Roberts and Tesman [RoTe03]. A wide selection of combinatorial identities can be found in Riordan [Ri68] and in Benjamin and Quinn [BeQu03]. Combinatorial algorithms, including algorithms for generating permutations and combinations, are described by Even [Ev73]; Lehmer [Le64]; and Reingold, Nievergelt, and Deo [ReNiDe77].

CHAPTER 7 Useful references for discrete probability theory include Feller [Fe68], Nabin [Na00], and Ross [Ro09a]. Ross [Ro02], which focuses on the application of probability theory to computer science, provides examples of average case complexity analysis and covers the probabilistic method. Aho and Ullman [AhUl95] includes a discussion of various aspects of probability theory important in

computer science, including programming applications of probability. The probabilistic method is discussed in a chapter in Aigner, Ziegler, and Hoffman [AiZiHo09], a monograph devoted to clever, insightful, and brilliant proofs, that is, proofs that Paul Erd˝os described as coming from “The Book.” Extensive coverage of the probabilistic method can be found in Alon and Spencer [AlSp00]. Bayes’ theorem is covered in [PaPi01]. Additional material on spam filters can be found in [Zd05].

CHAPTER 8 Many different models using recurrence relations can be found in Roberts and Tesman [RoTe03] and Tucker [Tu06]. Exhaustive treatments of linear homogeneous recurrence relations with constant coefficients, and related inhomogeneous recurrence relations, can be found in Brualdi [Br09], Liu [Li68], and Mattson [Ma93]. Divide-and-conquer algorithms and their complexity are covered in Roberts and Tesman [RoTe03] and Stanat and McAllister [StMc77]. Descriptions of fast multiplication of integers and matrices can be found in Aho, Hopcroft, and Ullman [AhHoUl74] and Knuth [Kn97b]. An excellent introduction to generating functions can be found in Pólya, Tarjan, and Woods [PoTaWo83]. Generating functions are studied in detail in Brualdi [Br09]; Cohen [Co78]; Graham, Knuth, and Patashnik [GrKnPa94]; Grimaldi [Gr03]; and Roberts and Tesman [RoTe03]. Additional applications of the principle of inclusion–exclusion can be found in Liu [Li85] and [Li68]; Roberts and Tesman [RoTe03]; and Ryser [Ry63].

CHAPTER 9 General references for relations, including treatments of equivalence relations and partial orders, include Bobrow and Arbib [BoAr74]; Grimaldi [Gr03]; Sanhi [Sa85]; and Tremblay and Manohar [TrMa75]. Discussions of relational models for databases are given in Date [Da82] and Aho and Ullman [AhUl95]. The original papers by Roy and Warshall for finding transitive closures can be found in [Ro59] and [Wa62], respectively. Directed graphs are studied in Chartrand, Lesniak, and Zhang [ChLeZh05]; Gross and Yellen [GrYe05]; Robinson and Foulds [RoFo80]; Roberts and Tesman [RoTe03]; and Tucker [Tu06]. The application of lattices to information flow is treated in Denning [De82].

CHAPTER 10 General references for graph theory include Agnarsson and Greenlaw [AgGr06]; Aldous, Wilson, and Best [AlWiBe00]; Behzad and Chartrand [BeCh71]; Chartrand, Lesniak, and Zhang [ChLeZh05]; Chartrand and Zhang [ChZh04]; Bondy and Murty [BoMu10]; Chartrand and Oellermann [ChOe93]; Graver and Watkins [GrWa77]; Roberts and Tesman [RoTe03]; Tucker [Tu06]; West [We00]; Wilson [Wi85]; and Wilson and Watkins [WiWa90]. A wide variety of applications of graph theory can be found in Chartrand [Ch77]; Deo [De74]; Foulds [Fo92]; Roberts

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Suggested Reading B-3

and Tesman [RoTe03]; Roberts [Ro76]; Wilson and Beineke [WiBe79]; and McHugh [Mc90]. In depth treatments of the use of graph theory to study social networks, and other types of networks, appears in Easley and Kleinberg [EaKl10] and Newman [Ne10]. Applications involving large graphs, including the Web graph, are discussed in Hayes [Ha00a] and [Ha00b]. A comprehensive description of algorithms in graph theory can be found in Gibbons [Gi85] and in Kocay and Kreher [KoKr04]. Other references for algorithms in graph theory include Buckley and Harary [BuHa90]; Chartrand and Oellermann [ChOe93]; Chachra, Ghare, and Moore [ChGhMo79]; Even [Ev73] and [Ev79]; Hu [Hu82]; and Reingold, Nievergelt, and Deo [ReNiDe77]. A translation of Euler’s original paper on the Königsberg bridge problem can be found in Euler [Eu53]. Dijkstra’s algorithm is studied in Gibbons [Gi85]; Liu [Li85]; and Reingold, Nievergelt, and Deo [ReNiDe77]. Dijkstra’s original paper can be found in [Di59]. A proof of Kuratowski’s theorem can be found in Harary [Ha69] and Liu [Li68]. Crossing numbers and thicknesses of graphs are studied in Chartrand, Lesniak, and Zhang [ChLeZh05]. References for graph coloring and the four-color theorem are included in Barnette [Ba83] and Saaty and Kainen [SaKa86]. The original conquest of the four-color theorem is reported in Appel and Haken [ApHa76]. Applications of graph coloring are described by Roberts and Tesman [RoTe03]. The history of graph theory is covered in Biggs, Lloyd, and Wilson [BiLlWi86]. Interconnection networks for parallel processing are discussed in Akl [Ak89] and Siegel and Hsu [SiHs88].

CHAPTER 11 Trees are studied in Deo [De74], Grimaldi [Gr03], Knuth [Kn97a], Roberts and Tesman [RoTe03], and Tucker [Tu06]. The use of trees in computer science is described by Gotlieb and Gotlieb [GoGo78], Horowitz and Sahni [HoSa82], and Knuth [Kn97a, 98]. Roberts and Tesman [RoTe03] covers applications of trees to many different areas. Prefix codes and Huffman coding are covered in Hamming [Ha80]. Backtracking is an old technique; its use to solve maze puzzles can be found in the 1891 book by Lucas [Lu91]. An extensive discussion of how to solve problems using backtracking can be found in Reingold, Nievergelt, and Deo [ReNiDe77]. Gibbons [Gi85] and Reingold, Nievergelt, and Deo [ReNiDe77] contain discussions of algorithms for constructing spanning trees and minimal spanning trees. The background and history of algorithms for finding minimal spanning trees is covered in Graham and Hell [GrHe85]. Prim and Kruskal described their algorithms for finding minimal spanning trees in [Pr57] and [Kr56], respectively. Sollin’s algorithm is an example of an algorithm well suited for parallel processing; although Sollin never published a description of it, his algorithm has been described by Even [Ev73] and Goodman and Hedetniemi [GoHe77].

gebra to logic circuits and switching circuits are described by Hayes [Ha93], Hohn [Ho66], Katz and Borriello [KaBo04], and Kohavi [Ko86]. The original papers dealing with the minimization of sum-of-products expansions using maps are Karnaugh [Ka53] and Veitch [Ve52]. The Quine-McCluskey method was introduced in McCluskey [Mc56] and Quine [Qu52] and [Qu55]. Threshold functions are covered in Kohavi [Ko86].

CHAPTER 13 General references for formal grammars, automata theory, and the theory of computation include Davis, Sigal, and Weyuker [DaSiWe94]; Denning, Dennis, and Qualitz [DeDeQu81]; Hopcroft, Motwani, and Ullman [HoMoUl06]; Hopkin and Moss [HoMo76]; Lewis and Papadimitriou [LePa97]; McNaughton [Mc82]; and Sipser [Si06]. Mealy machines and Moore machines were originally introduced in Mealy [Me55] and Moore [Mo56]. The original proof of Kleene’s theorem can be found in [Kl56]. Powerful models of computation, including pushdown automata and Turing machines, are discussed in Brookshear [Br89], Hennie [He77], Hopcroft and Ullman [HoUl79], Hopkin and Moss [HoMo76], Martin [Ma03], Sipser [Si06], and Wood [Wo87]. Barwise and Etchemendy [BaEt93] is an excellent introduction to Turing machines. Interesting articles about the history and application of Turing machines and related machines can be found in Herken [He88]. Busy beaver machines were first introduced by Rado in [Ra62], and information about them can be found in Dewdney [De84] and [De93], the article by Brady in Herken [He88], and in Wood [Wo87].

APPENDIXES A discussion of axioms for the real number and for the integers can be found in Morash [Mo91]. Detailed treatments of exponential and logarithmic functions can be found in calculus books such as Apostol [Ap67], Spivak [Sp94], and Thomas and Finney [ThFi96]. Pohl and Shaw [PoSh81] use a form of pseudocode that has the same features as those described in Appendix 3. Most textbooks on algorithms, such as Cormen, Leierson, Rivest, and Stein [CoLeRiSt09] and Kleinberg and Tardos [KlTa05], use versions of pseudocode similar to the pseudocode in this text.

REFERENCES [AgGr06] G. Agnarsson and R. Greenlaw, Graph Theory: Modeling, Applications, and Algorithms, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2006.

CHAPTER 12

[AhHoUl74] A. V. Aho, J. E. Hopcroft, and J. D. Ullman, The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms, Addison- Wesley, Reading, MA, 1974.

Boolean algebra is studied in Hohn [Ho66], Kohavi [Ko86], and Tremblay and Manohar [TrMa75]. Applications of Boolean al-

[AhUl95] Alfred V. Aho and Jeffrey D. Ullman, Foundations of Computer Science, C Edition, Computer Science Press, New York, 1995.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH B-4

Suggested Reading

[AiZiHo09] Martin Aigner, Günter M. Ziegler, and Karl H. Hofmann, Proofs from THE BOOK, 4th ed., Springer, Berlin, 2009.

[BoAr74] L. S. Bobrow and M. A. Arbib, Discrete Mathematics, Saunders, Philadelphia, 1974.

[Ak89] S. G. Akl, The Design and Analysis of Parallel Algorithms, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.

[Bo00] K. P. Bogart, Introductory Combinatorics, 3d ed. Academic Press, San Diego, 2000.

[AlAr78] S. Alagic and M. A. Arbib, The Design of WellStructured and Correct Programs, Springer-Verlag, NewYork, 1978.

[Bo07] M. Bona, Enumerative Combinatorics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2007.

[AlWiBe00] J. M. Aldous, R. J. Wilson, and S. Best, Graphs and Applications: An Introductory Approach, Springer, New York, 2000. [AlSl10] R.B.J.T. Allenby and A. Slomson, How to Count: An Introduction to Combinatorics, 2d. ed., Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, 2010. [AlSp00] Noga Alon and Joel H. Spencer, The Probabilistic Method, 2d ed., Wiley, New York, 2000. [An89] I. Anderson, A First Course in Combinatorial Mathematics, 2d. ed., Oxford University Press, New York, 1989. [An79] R. B. Anderson, Proving Programs Correct, Wiley, New York, 1979. [Ap67] T. M. Apostol, Calculus, Vol. I, 2d ed., Wiley, New York, 1967. [ApHa76] K. Appel and W. Haken, “Every Planar Map Is 4colorable,” Bulletin of the AMS, 82 (1976), 711–712. [ArKfMo80] M. A. Arbib, A. J. Kfoury, and R. N. Moll, A Basis for Theoretical Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, NewYork, 1980. [AvCh90] B. Averbach and O. Chein, Problem Solving Through Recreational Mathematics, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1980. [BaGe99] S. Baase and A. Van Gelder, Computer Algorithms: Introduction to Design and Analysis, 3d ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1999. [Ba86] R. C. Backhouse, Program Construction and Verification, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986. [Ba83] D. Barnette, Map Coloring, Polyhedra, and the FourColor Problem, Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 1983.

[BoMu10] J. A. Bondy and U. S. R. Murty, Graph Theory with Applications, Springer, New York, 2010. [Bo04] P. Bork, L. J. Jensen, C. von Mering, A. K. Ramani, I. Lee, and E. M. Marcotte, “Protein interaction networks from yeast to human,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 14 (2004), 292–299. [BoMa86] R. C. Bose and B. Manvel, Introduction to Combinatorial Theory, Wiley, New York, 1986. [Bo00] A. Brodera, R. Kumar, F. Maghoula, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, R. Statac, A. Tomkins, and Janet Wiener, “Graph structure in the Web,” Computer Networks, 33 (2000), 309– 320. [Br89] J. G. Brookshear, Theory of Computation, Benjamin Cummings, Redwood City, CA, 1989. [Br09] R. A. Brualdi, Introductory Combinatorics, 5th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2009. [BuHa90] F. Buckley and F. Harary, Distance in Graphs, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1990. [Ca79] L. Carmony, “Odd Pie Fights,” Mathematics Teacher 72 (January, 1979), 61–64. [Ca78] L. Carroll, Symbolic Logic, Crown, New York, 1978. [ChGhMo79] V. Chachra, P. M. Ghare, and J. M. Moore, Applications of Graph Theory Algorithms, North-Holland, New York, 1979. [Ch77] G. Chartrand, Graphs as Mathematical Models, Prindle, Weber & Schmidt, Boston, 1977. [ChLeZh10] G. Chartrand, L. Lesniak, and P. Zhang, Graphs and Digraphs, 5th ed., Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2010. [ChOe93] G. Chartrand and O. R. Oellermann, Applied Algorithmic Graph Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993.

[BaEt93] Jon Barwise and John Etchemendy, Turing’s World 3.0 for the Macintosh, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, 1993.

[ChZh04] G. Chartrand and P. Zhang, Introduction to Graph Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2004.

[Be80] F. S. Beckman, Mathematical Foundations of Programming, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1980.

[ClMe94] W. F. Clocksin and C. S. Mellish, Programming in Prolog, 4th ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.

[BeCh71] M. Behzad and G. Chartrand, Introduction to the Theory of Graphs, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 1971.

[Co78] D. I. A. Cohen, Basic Techniques of Combinatorial Theory, Wiley, New York, 1978.

[BeQu03] A. Benjamin and J. J. Quine, Proofs that Really Count, Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 2003.

[Co05] D. Comer, Internetworking with TCP/IP, Principles, Protocols, and Architecture, Vol. 1, 5th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2005.

[Be86] J. Bentley, Programming Pearls, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1986. [BeFr72] G. Berman and K. D. Fryer, Introduction to Combinatorics, Academic Press, New York, 1972.

[CoLeRiSt09] T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leierson, R. L. Rivest, and C. Stein, Introduction to Algorithms, 3rd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2009.

[BiLlWi99] N. L. Biggs, E. K. Lloyd, and R. J. Wilson, Graph Theory 1736–1936, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1999.

[CrPo10] Richard Crandall and Carl Pomerance, 2d ed., Prime Numbers: A Computational Perspective, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2010.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Suggested Reading B-5

[Cu05] Antonella Cupillari, The Nuts and Bolts of Proofs, 3d ed., Academic Press, San Diego, 2005.

[Go94] S. W. Golomb, Polyominoes, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994.

[Cu84] C. W. Curtis, Linear Algebra, Springer-Verlag, NewYork, 1984.

[Go84] G. H. Gonnet, Handbook of Algorithms and Data Structures, Addison-Wesley, London, 1984.

[Da82] C. J. Date, An Introduction to Database Systems, 3d ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1982.

[GoHe77] S. E. Goodman and S. T. Hedetniemi, Introduction to the Design and Analysis of Algorithms, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1977.

[DaSiWe94] M. Davis, R. Sigal, and E. J. Weyuker, Computability, Complexity, and Languages, 2d ed., Academic Press, San Diego, 1994. [Da10] T. Davis, “The Mathematics of Sudoku,” November, 2010, available at http://geometer.org/mathcircles/sudoku.pdf [De82] D. E. R. Denning, Cryptography and Data Security, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1982. [DeDeQu81] P. J. Denning, J. B. Dennis, and J. E. Qualitz, Machines, Languages, and Computation, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1981. [De74] N. Deo, Graph Theory with Applications to Engineering and Computer Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1974. [DeOr11] S. L. Devadoss and J. O’Rourke, Discrete and Computational Geometry, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2011. [De02] K. Devlin, The Millennium Problems: The Seven Greatest Unsolved Mathematical Puzzles of Our Time, Basic Book, New York, 2002. [De84] A. K. Dewdney, “Computer Recreations,” Scientific American, 251, no. 2 (August 1984), 19–23; 252, no. 3 (March 1985), 14–23; 251, no. 4 (April 1985), 20–30. [De93] A. K. Dewdney, The New Turing Omnibus: Sixty-Six Excursions in Computer Science, W. H. Freeman, New York, 1993. [Di59] E. Dijkstra, “Two Problems in Connexion with Graphs,” Numerische Mathematik, 1 (1959), 269–271.

[GoGo78] C. C. Gotlieb and L. R. Gotlieb, Data Types and Structures, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1978. [GrHe85] R. L. Graham and P. Hell, “On the History of the Minimum Spanning Tree Problem,” Annals of the History of Computing, 7 (1985), 43–57. [GrKnPa94] R. L. Graham, D. E. Knuth, and O. Patashnik, Concrete Mathematics, 2d ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1994. [GrRoSp90] Ronald L. Graham, Bruce L. Rothschild, and Joel H. Spencer, Ramsey Theory, 2d ed., Wiley, New York, 1990. [GrWa77] J. E. Graver and M. E. Watkins, Combinatorics with Emphasis on the Theory of Graphs, Springer-Verlag, NewYork, 1977. [GrSc93] D. Gries and F. B. Schneider, A Logical Approach to Discrete Math, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993. [Gr03] R. P. Grimaldi, Discrete and Combinatorial Mathematics, 5th ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2003. [Gr07] J. L. Gross, Combinatorial Methods with Computer Applications, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2007. [GrYe05] J. L. Gross and J. Yellen, Graph Theory and Its Applications, 2d ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2005. [GrYe03] J. L. Gross and J. Yellen, Handbook of Graph Theory, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2003. [Gr90] Jerrold W. Grossman, Discrete Mathematics: An Introduction to Concepts, Methods, and Applications, Macmillan, New York, 1990.

[EaKl10] D. Easley and J. Kleinberg, Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010.

[Gr97] J. Gruska, Foundations of Computing, International Thomsen Computer Press, London, 1997.

[Eu53] L. Euler, “The Koenigsberg Bridges,” Scientific American, 189, no. 1 (July 1953), 66–70.

[Gu10] D. A. Gunderson, Handbook of Mathematical Induction, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, 2010.

[Ev73] S. Even, Algorithmic Combinatorics, Macmillan, New York, 1973.

[Ha60] P. R. Halmos, Naive Set Theory, D. Van Nostrand, New York, 1960.

[Ev79] S. Even, Graph Algorithms, Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD, 1979.

[Ha80] R. W. Hamming, Coding and Information Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980.

[Fe68] W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 1, 3d ed., Wiley, New York, 1968.

[Ha69] F. Harary, Graph Theory,Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1969.

[Fo92] L. R. Foulds, Graph Theory Applications, SpringerVerlag, New York, 1992.

[HaWrWiHe08] G. H. Hardy, E. M. Wright, A. Wiles, and R. Heath-Brown, An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 6th ed., Oxford University Press, USA, New York, 2008.

[GaJo79] Michael R. Garey and David S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to NP-Completeness, Freeman, New York, 1979.

[Ha87] D. Harel, Algorithmics, The Spirit of Computing, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1987.

[Gi85] A. Gibbons, Algorithmic Graph Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1985.

[Ha00a] Brian Hayes, “Graph-Theory in Practice, Part I,” American Scientist, 88, no. 1 (2000), 9–13.

[Gi70] C. C. Gillispie, ed., Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Scribner’s, New York, 1970.

[Ha00b] Brian Hayes, “Graph-Theory in Practice, Part II,” American Scientist, 88, no. 2 (2000), 104–109.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH B-6

Suggested Reading

[Ha93] John P. Hayes, Introduction to Digital Logic Design, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1993. [He77] F. Hennie, Introduction to Computability, AddisonWesley, Reading, MA, 1977. [He88] R. Herken, The Universal Turing Machine, A HalfCentury Survey, Oxford University Press, New York, 1988.

[KoKr04] W. Kocay and D. L. Kreher, Graph Algorithms and Optimization, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, 2004. [Ko86] Z. Kohavi, Switching and Finite Automata Theory, 2d ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986.

[Ho76] C. Ho, “Decomposition of a Polygon into Triangles,” Mathematical Gazette, 60 (1976), 132–134.

[KrSt98] Donald H. Kreher and Douglas R. Stinson, Combinatorial Algorithms: Generation, Enumeration, and Search, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.

[Ho99] D. Hofstadter, Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Internal Golden Braid, Basic Books, New York, 1999.

[Kr87] L. Kronsjö, Algorithms: Their Complexity and Efficiency, 2d ed., Wiley, New York, 1987.

[Ho66] F. E. Hohn, Applied Boolean Algebra, 2d ed., Macmillan, New York, 1966.

[Kr56] J. B. Kruskal, “On the Shortest Spanning Subtree of a Graph and the Traveling Salesman Problem,” Proceedings of the AMS, 1 (1956), 48–50.

[HoMoUl06] J. E. Hopcroft, R Motwani, and J. D. Ullman, Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, 3d ed., Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 2006. [HoMo76] D. Hopkin and B. Moss, Automata, Elsevier, NorthHolland, New York, 1976. [HoSa82] E. Horowitz and S. Sahni, Fundamentals of Computer Algorithms, Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD, 1982. [Hu82] T.C. Hu, Combinatorial Algorithms, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1982. [Hu07] W. Huber, V. J. Carey, L. Long, S. Falcon, and R. Gentleman, “Graphs in molecular biology,” BMC Bioinformatics, 8 (Supplement 6) (2007). [HuRy04] M. Huth and M. Ryan, Logic in Computer Science, 2d ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2004. [In93] D. C. Ince, An Introduction to Discrete Mathematics, Formal System Specification, and Z, 2d ed., Oxford, New York, 1993. [KaMo64] D. Kalish and R. Montague, Logic: Techniques of Formal Reasoning, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York, 1964. [Ka53] M. Karnaugh, “The Map Method for Synthesis of Combinatorial Logic Circuits,” Transactions of the AIEE, part I, 72 (1953), 593–599.

[La10] J. C. Lagarias (ed.), The Ultimate Challenge: The 3x + 1 Problem, The American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2010. [Le06] A. V. Levitin, Introduction to the Design and Analysis of Algorithms, 2d, ed., Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 2006. [Le64] D. H. Lehmer, “The Machine Tools of Combinatorics,” in E. F. Beckenbach (ed.), Applied Combinatorial Mathematics, Wiley, New York, 1964. [Le77] W. J. LeVeque, Fundamentals of Number Theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977. [LePa97] H. R. Lewis and C. H. Papadimitriou, Elements of the Theory of Computation, 2d ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1997. [LiLi81] Y. Lin and S. Y. T. Lin, Set Theory with Applications, 2d ed., Mariner, Tampa, FL, 1981. [Li68] C. L. Liu, Introduction to Combinatorial Mathematics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968. [Li85] C. L. Liu, Elements of Discrete Mathematics, 2d ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985. [Lo79] L. Lovász, Combinatorial Problems and Exercises, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.

[KaBo04] R. H. Katz and G. Borriello, Contemporary Logic Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2004.

[Lu91] E. Lucas, Récréations Mathématiques, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1891.

[Kl56] S. C. Kleene, “Representation of Events by Nerve Nets,” in Automata Studies, 3–42, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1956.

[Ma89] U. Manber, Introduction to Algorithms: A Creative Approach, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989.

[KlTa05] J. Kleinberg and E. Tardos, Algorithm Design, Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2005

[Ma91] G. E. Martin, Polyominoes: A Guide to Puzzles and Problems in Tiling, MathematicalAssociation ofAmerica, Washington, DC, 1991.

[Kn77] D. E. Knuth, “Algorithms,” Scientific American, 236, no. 4 (April 1977), 63–80.

[Ma03] J. C. Martin, Introduction to Languages and the Theory of Computation, 3d ed., McGraw-Hill, NewYork, 2003.

[Kn97a] D. E. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. I: Fundamental Algorithms, 3d ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1997.

[Ma93] H. F. Mattson, Jr., Discrete Mathematics with Applications, Wiley, New York, 1993.

[Kn97b] D. E. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. II: Seminumerical Algorithms, 3d ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1997. [Kn98] D. E. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. III: Sorting and Searching, 2d ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1998.

[Mc56] E. J. McCluskey, Jr., “Minimization of Boolean Functions,” Bell System Technical Journal, 35 (1956), 1417–1444. [Mc90] J.A. McHugh, Algorithmic Graph Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990. [Mc82] R. McNaughton, Elementary Computability, Formal Languages, and Automata, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Suggested Reading B-7

[Me55] G. H. Mealy, “A Method for Synthesizing Sequential Circuits,” Bell System Technical Journal, 34 (1955), 1045–1079.

[PuBr85] P. W. Purdom, Jr. and C. A. Brown, The Analysis of Algorithms, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, 1985.

[Me09] E. Mendelson, Introduction to Mathematical Logic, 5th ed., Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009.

[Qu52] W. V. Quine, “The Problem of Simplifying Truth Functions,” American Mathematical Monthly, 59 (1952), 521–531.

[MeOoVa97] A. J. Menezes, P. C. van Oorschoot, S. A. Vanstone, Handbook of Applied Cryptography, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1997.

[Qu55] W. V. Quine, “A Way to Simplify Truth Functions,” American Mathematical Monthly, 62 (1955), 627–631.

[MiRo91] J. G. Michaels and K. H. Rosen, Applications of Discrete Mathematics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991. [Mo69] J. R. Monk, Introduction to Set Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969. [Mo91] R. P. Morash, Bridge to Abstract Mathematics, McGrawHill, New York, 1991. [Mo56] E. F. Moore, “Gedanken-Experiments on Sequential Machines,” in Automata Studies, 129–153, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1956.

[Ra62] T. Rado, “On Non-Computable Functions,” Bell System Technical Journal (May 1962), 877–884. [Ra92] Gregory J. E. Rawlins, Compared to What? An Introduction to the Analysis of Algorithms, Computer Science Press, New York, 1992. [ReNiDe77] E. M. Reingold, J. Nievergelt, and N. Deo, Combinatorial Algorithms: Theory and Practice, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977. [Ri58] J. Riordan, An Introduction to Combinatorial Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1958.

[Na00] Paul J. Nabin, Duelling Idiots and Other Probability Puzzlers, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2000.

[Ri68] J. Riordan, Combinatorial Identities, Wiley, New York, 1968.

[Ne85] C. V. Negoita, Expert Systems and Fuzzy Systems, Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, CA, 1985.

[RiShAd78] R. Rivest, A. Shamir, and L. Adleman, “A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems,” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 31, no. 2 (1978), 120–128.

[Ne10] M. Newman, Networks: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, New York, 2010. [NiMa95] Ulf Nilsson and Jan Maluszynski, Logic, Programming, and Prolog, 2d ed., Wiley, Chichester, England, 1995. [Or00] J. O’Rourke, Computational Geometry in C, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000. [Or63] O. Ore, Graphs and Their Uses, Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 1963. [0r88] O. Ore, Number Theory and its History, Dover, NewYork, 1988. [PaPi01] A. Papoulis and S. U. Pillai, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001. [Pe87] A. Pelc, “Solution of Ulam’s Problem on Searching with a Lie,” Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 44 (1987), 129–140.

[Ro86] E. S. Roberts, Thinking Recursively, Wiley, New York, 1986. [Ro76] F. S. Roberts, Discrete Mathematics Models, PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1976. [RoTe03] F. S. Roberts and B. Tesman, Applied Combinatorics, 2d ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2003. [RoFo80] D. F. Robinson and L. R. Foulds, Digraphs: Theory and Techniques, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1980. [Ro84] J. S. Rohl, Recursion via Pascal, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1984. [Ro10] K. H. Rosen, Elementary Number Theory and Its Applications, 6th ed., Pearson, Boston, 2010. [Ro00] K. H. Rosen, Handbook of Discrete and Combinatorial Mathematics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000.

[Pe09] M. S. Petrovi´c, Famous Puzzles of Great Mathematicians, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2009.

[Ro09] Jason Rosenhouse, The Monty Hall Problem, Oxford University Press, New York, 2009.

[PoSh81] I. Pohl and A. Shaw, The Nature of Computation: An Introduction to Computer Science, Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD, 1981.

[Ro09a] Sheldon M. Ross, A First Course in Probability Theory, 7th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2009.

[Po62] George Pólya, Mathematical Discovery, Vols. 1 and 2, Wiley, New York, 1962. [Po71] George Pólya, How to Solve It, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1971. [Po90] George Pólya, Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1990. [PoTaWo83] G. Pólya, R. E. Tarjan, and D. R. Woods, Notes on Introductory Combinatorics, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1983. [Pr57] R. C. Prim, “Shortest Connection Networks and Some Generalizations,” Bell System Technical Journal, 36 (1957), 1389–1401.

[Ro02] Sheldon M. Ross, Probability Models for Computer Science, Harcourt/Academic Press, San Diego, 2002. [Ro59] B. Roy, “Transitivité et Connexité,” C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 249 (1959), 216. [Ry63] H. Ryser, Combinatorial Mathematics, MathematicalAssociation of America, Washington, DC, 1963. [SaKa86] T. L. Saaty and P. C. Kainen, The Four-Color Problem: Assaults and Conquest, Dover, New York, 1986. [Sa85] S. Sahni, Concepts in Discrete Mathematics, Camelot, Minneapolis, 1985. [Sa00] K. Sayood, Introduction to Data Compression, 2d ed., Academic Press, San Diego, 2000.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH B-8

Suggested Reading

[SePi89] J. Seberry and J. Pieprzyk, Cryptography: An Introduction to Computer Security, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.

[Ta83] R. E. Tarjan, Data Structures and Network Algorithms, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1983.

[Se03] R. Sedgewick, Algorithms in Java, 3d ed., AddisonWesley, Reading, MA, 2003.

[ThFi96] G. B. Thomas and R. L. Finney, Calculus and Analytic Geometry, 9th ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1996.

[SiHs88] H. J. Siegel and W. T. Hsu, “Interconnection Networks,” in Computer Architectures, V. M. Milutinovic (ed.), NorthHolland, New York, 1988, pp. 225–264.

[TrMa75] J. P. Tremblay and R. P. Manohar, Discrete Mathematical Structures with Applications to Computer Science, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.

[Si99] S. Singh, The Code Book, Doubleday, New York, 1999.

[Tu06] Alan Tucker, Applied Combinatorics, 5th ed., Wiley, New York, 2006.

[Si66] A. Sinkov, Elementary Cryptanalysis, Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 1966. [Si06] M. Sipser, Introduction to the Theory of Computation, Course Technology, Boston, 2006 [SlPl95] N. J. A. Sloane and S. Plouffe, The Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, Academic Press, New York, 1995. [Sm78] Raymond Smullyan, What Is the Name of This Book?: The Riddle of Dracula and Other Logical Puzzles, PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1978. [Sm92] Raymond Smullyan, Lady or the Tiger? And Other Logic Puzzles Including a Mathematical Novel That Features Godel’s Great Discovery, Times Book, New York, 1992. [Sm98] Raymond Smullyan, The Riddle of Scheherazade: And Other Amazing Puzzles, Ancient & Modern, Harvest Book, Fort Washington, PA, 1998.

[Ve52] E. W. Veitch, “A Chart Method for Simplifying Truth Functions,” Proceedings of the ACM (1952), 127–133. [Ve06] David Velleman, How to Prove It: A Structured Approach, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006. [Vi71] N. Y. Vilenkin, Combinatorics, Academic Press, New York, 1971. [Wa80] M. Wand, Induction, Recursion, and Programming, North-Holland, New York, 1980. [Wa62] S. Warshall, “A Theorem on Boolean Matrices,” Journal of the ACM, 9 (1962), 11–12. [We00] D. B. West, Introduction to Graph Theory, 2d ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2000. [Wi02] Herbert S. Wilf, Algorithms and Complexity, 2d ed., A. K. Peters, Natick, MA, 2002.

[So09] Daniel Solow, How to Read and Do Proofs: An Introduction to Mathematical Thought Processes, 5th ed., Wiley, New York, 2009.

[Wi85] S. G. Williamson, Combinatorics for Computer Science, Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD, 1985.

[So61] I. S. Sominskii, Method of Mathematical Induction, Blaisdell, New York, 1961.

[Wi85a] R. J. Wilson, Introduction to Graph Theory, 3d ed., Longman, Essex, England, 1985.

[Sp94] M. Spivak, Calculus, 3d ed., Publish or Perish, Wilmington, DE, 1994.

[WiBe79] R. J. Wilson and L. W. Beineke, Applications of Graph Theory, Academic Press, London, 1979.

[StMc77] D. Stanat and D. F. McAllister, Discrete Mathematics in Computer Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977.

[WiWa90] R. J. Wilson and J. J. Watkins, Graphs, An Introductory Approach, Wiley, New York, 1990.

[St78] H. M. Stark, An Introduction to Number Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978. [St05] Douglas R. Stinson, Cryptography, Theory and Practice, 3d ed., Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2005. [St94] P. K. Stockmeyer, “Variations on the Four-Post Tower of Hanoi Puzzle,” Congressus Numerantrum 102 (1994), 3–12. [St74] R. R. Stoll, Sets, Logic, and Axiomatic Theories, 2d ed., W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1974.

[Wi76] N. Wirth, Algorithms + Data Structures = Programs, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1976. [Wi84] N. Wirth, “Data Structures and Algorithms,” Scientific American, 251 (September 1984), 60–69. [Wo98] Robert S. Wolf, Proof, Logic, and Conjecture: The Mathematician’s Toolbox, W. H. Freeman, New York, 1998. [Wo87] D. Wood, Theory of Computation, Harper & Row, New York, 1987.

[St09] G. W. Strang, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 4th ed., Wellesley Cambridge Press, Wellesley, MA, 2009

[Zd05] J. Zdziarski, Ending Spam: Bayesian Content Filtering and the Art of Statistical Language Classification, No Starch Press, San Francisco, 2005.

[Su87] P. Suppes, Introduction to Logic, D.Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ, 1987.

[Zi91] H. J. Zimmermann, Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, 2d ed., Kluwer, Boston, 1991.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises CHAPTER 1 Section 1.1 1. a) Yes, T b) Yes, F c) Yes, T d) Yes, F e) No f) No 3. a) Mei does not have an MP3 player. b) There is pollution in New Jersey. c) 2 + 1 = 3. d) The summer in Maine is not hot or it is not sunny. 5. a) Steve does not have more than 100 GB free disk space on his laptop b) Zach does not block e-mails from Jennifer, or he does not block texts from Jennifer c) 7 · 11 · 13 = 999 d) Diane did not ride her bike 100 miles on Sunday 7. a) F b) T c) T d) T e) T 9. a) Sharks have not been spotted near the shore. b) Swimming at the New Jersey shore is allowed, and sharks have been spotted near the shore. c) Swimming at the New Jersey shore is not allowed, or sharks have been spotted near the shore. d) If swimming at the New Jersey shore is allowed, then sharks have not been spotted near the shore. e) If sharks have not been spotted near the shore, then swimming at the New Jersey shore is allowed. f) If swimming at the New Jersey shore is not allowed, then sharks have not been spotted near the shore. g) Swimming at the New Jersey shore is allowed if and only if sharks have not been spotted near the shore. h) Swimming at the New Jersey shore is not allowed, and either swimming at the New Jersey shore is allowed or sharks have not been spotted near the shore. (Note that we were able to incorporate the parentheses by using the word “either” in the second half of the sentence.) 11. a) p ∧ q b) p ∧ ¬q c) ¬p ∧ ¬q d) p ∨ q e) p → q f) (p ∨ q) ∧ (p →¬q) g) q ↔ p 13. a) ¬p b) p ∧ ¬q c) p → q d) ¬p → ¬q e) p → q f) q ∧ ¬p g) q → p 15. a) r ∧ ¬p b) ¬p ∧q ∧ r c) r → (q ↔ ¬p) d) ¬ q∧ ¬p ∧ r e) (q →(¬r ∧ ¬p)) ∧ ¬((¬r ∧ ¬p) → q) f) (p ∧ r) → ¬q 17. a) False b) True c) True d) True 19. a) Exclusive or: You get only one beverage. b) Inclusive or: Long passwords can have any combination of symbols. c) Inclusive or: A student with both courses is even more qualified. d) Either interpretation possible; a traveler might wish to pay with a mixture of the two currencies, or the store may not allow that. 21. a) Inclusive or: It is allowable to take discrete mathematics if you have had calculus or computer science, or both. Exclusive or: It is allowable to take discrete mathematics if you have had calculus or computer science, but not if you have had both. Most likely the inclusive or is intended. b) Inclusive or: You can take the rebate, or you can get a low-interest loan, or you can get both the rebate and a low-interest loan. Exclusive or: You can take the rebate, or you can get a low-interest loan, but you cannot get both the rebate and a low-interest loan. Most likely the exclusive or is intended. c) Inclusive or: You can order two items from column A and none from column B, or three items from column B and none from column A, or five items including two from column A and three from column B. Exclusive or: You can

order two items from column A or three items from column B, but not both. Almost certainly the exclusive or is intended. d) Inclusive or: More than 2 feet of snow or windchill below −100, or both, will close school. Exclusive or: More than 2 feet of snow or windchill below −100, but not both, will close school. Certainly the inclusive or is intended. 23. a) If the wind blows from the northeast, then it snows. b) If it stays warm for a week, then the apple trees will bloom. c) If the Pistons win the championship, then they beat the Lakers. d) If you get to the top of Long’s Peak, then you must have walked 8 miles. e) If you are world-famous, then you will get tenure as a professor. f) If you drive more than 400 miles, then you will need to buy gasoline. g) If your guarantee is good, then you must have bought your CD player less than 90 days ago. h) If the water is not too cold, then Jan will go swimming. 25. a) You buy an ice cream cone if and only if it is hot outside. b) You win the contest if and only if you hold the only winning ticket. c) You get promoted if and only if you have connections. d) Your mind will decay if and only if you watch television. e) The train runs late if and only if it is a day I take the train. 27. a) Converse: “I will ski tomorrow only if it snows today.” Contrapositive: “If I do not ski tomorrow, then it will not have snowed today.” Inverse: “If it does not snow today, then I will not ski tomorrow.” b) Converse: “If I come to class, then there will be a quiz.” Contrapositive: “If I do not come to class, then there will not be a quiz.” Inverse: “If there is not going to be a quiz, then I don’t come to class.” c) Converse: “A positive integer is a prime if it has no divisors other than 1 and itself.” Contrapositive: “If a positive integer has a divisor other than 1 and itself, then it is not prime.” Inverse: “If a positive integer is not prime, then it has a divisor other than 1 and itself.” 29. a) 2 b) 16 c) 64 d) 16 31. a) p T F

¬p F T

p ∧ ¬p F F

b) p T F

¬p F T

p ∨ ¬p T T

c) p

q

¬q

p ∨ ¬q

(p ∨ ¬q) → q

T T F F

T F T F

F T F T

T T F T

T F T F

d) p

q

p∨q

p∧q

(p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q)

T T F F

T F T F

T T T F

T F F F

T F F T

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

S-1

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-2

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

e) p

q

p→q

¬q

¬p

¬q → ¬p

(p → q) ↔ (¬q → ¬p)

T T F F

T F T F

T F T T

F T F T

F F T T

T F T T

T T T T

f) p

q

p→q

q→p

(p → q) → (q → p)

T T F F

T F T F

T F T T

T T F T

T T F T

33. For parts (a), (b), (c), (d), and (f) we have this table. p

q

(p ∨ q) → (p ⊕ q)

(p ⊕ q) → (p ∧ q)

(p ∨ q) ⊕ (p ∧ q)

(p ↔ q) ⊕ (¬p ↔ q)

(p ⊕ q) → (p ⊕ ¬q)

T T F F

T F T F

F T T T

T F F T

F T T F

T T T T

T F F T

For part (e) we have this table. p

q

r

¬p

¬r

p↔q

¬p ↔ ¬r

(p ↔ q) ⊕ (¬p ↔ ¬r)

T T T T F F F F

T T F F T T F F

T F T F T F T F

F F F F T T T T

F T F T F T F T

T T F F F F T T

T F T F F T F T

F T T F F T T F

35. p

q

p → ¬q

¬p ↔ q

(p → q)∨ (¬p → q)

(p → q)∧ (¬p → q)

(p ↔ q)∨ (¬p ↔ q)

(¬p ↔ ¬q) ↔ (p ↔ q)

T T F F

T F T F

F T T T

F T T F

T T T T

T F T F

T T T T

T T T T

p

q

r

p → (¬q ∨ r)

¬p → (q → r)

(p → q) ∨ (¬p → r)

(p → q) ∧ (¬p → r)

(p ↔ q) ∨ (¬q ↔ r)

(¬p ↔ ¬q) ↔ (q ↔ r)

T T T T F F F F

T T F F T T F F

T F T F T F T F

T F T T T T T T

T T T T T F T T

T T T T T T T T

T T F F T F T F

T T T F F T T T

T F T F F T F T

37.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-3

39. p

q

r

s

p↔q

r↔s

(p ↔ q) ↔ (r ↔ s)

T T T T T T T T F F F F F F F F

T T T T F F F F T T T T F F F F

T T F F T T F F T T F F T T F F

T F T F T F T F T F T F T F T F

T T T T F F F F F F F F T T T T

T F F T T F F T T F F T T F F T

T F F T F T T F F T T F T F F T

41. The first clause is true if and only if at least one of p, q, and r is true. The second clause is true if and only if at least one of the three variables is false. Therefore the entire statement is true if and only if there is at least one T and one F among the truth values of the variables, in other words, that they don’t all have the same truth value. 43. a) Bitwise OR is 111 1111; bitwise AND is 000 0000; bitwise XOR is 111 1111. b) Bitwise OR is 1111 1010; bitwise AND is 1010 0000; bitwise XOR is 0101 1010. c) Bitwise OR is 10 0111 1001; bitwise AND is 00 0100 0000; bitwise XOR is 10 0011 1001. d) Bitwise OR is 11 1111 1111; bitwise AND is 00 0000 0000; bitwise XOR is 11 1111 1111. 45. 0.2, 0.6 47. 0.8, 0.6 49. a) The 99th statement is true and the rest are false. b) Statements 1 through 50 are all true and statements 51 through 100 are all false. c) This cannot happen; it is a paradox, showing that these cannot be statements.

Section 1.2 1. e → a 3. g → (r ∧ (¬m) ∧ (¬b)) 5. e → (a ∧ (b ∨ p) ∧ r) 7. a) q → p b) q ∧ ¬p c) q → p d) ¬q → ¬p 9. Not consistent 11. Consistent 13. NEW AND JERSEY AND BEACHES, (JERSEY AND BEACHES) NOT NEW 15. “If I were to ask you whether the right branch leads to the ruins, would you answer yes?” 17 If the first professor did not want coffee, then he would know that the answer to the hostess’s question was “no.” Therefore the hostess and the remaining professors know that the first professor did want coffee. Similarly, the second professor must want coffee. When the third professor said “no,” the hostess knows that the third professor does not want coffee. 19. A is a knight and B is a knave. 21. A is a knight and B is a knight. 23. A is a knave and B is a knight. 25. A is the knight, B is the spy, C is the knave. 27. A is the knight, B is the spy, C is the knave. 29. Any of the three can be the knight, any can be the spy, any can be the knave. 31. No solutions 33. In order of decreasing salary: Fred, Maggie, Janice 35. The detective can

determine that the butler and cook are lying but cannot determine whether the gardener is telling the truth or whether the handyman is telling the truth. 37. The Japanese man owns the zebra, and the Norwegian drinks water. 39. One honest, 49 corrupt 41. a) ¬(p∧(q ∨¬r))b) ((¬p)∧(¬q))∨(p∧r) 43.

p r q p q r

Section 1.3 1. The equivalences follow by showing that the appropriate pairs of columns of this table agree. p

p∧T

p∨F

p∧F

p∨T

p∨p

p∧p

T F

T F

T F

F F

T T

T F

T F

b) p

q

p∧q

q ∧p

T T F F

T F T F

T F F F

T F F F

3. a) p

q

p∨q

q ∨p

T T F F

T F T F

T T T F

T T T F

5. p q r q ∨ r p ∧ (q ∨ r) p ∧ q p ∧ r T T T T F F F F

T T F F T T F F

T F T F T F T F

T T T F T T T F

T T T F F F F F

T T F F F F F F

T F T F F F F F

(p ∧ q)∨ (p ∧ r) T T T F F F F F

7. a) Jan is not rich, or Jan is not happy. b) Carlos will not bicycle tomorrow, and Carlos will not run tomorrow. c) Mei does not walk to class, and Mei does not take the bus to class. d) Ibrahim is not smart, or Ibrahim is not hard working. 9. a) p

q

p∧q

(p ∧ q) → p

T T F F

T F T F

T F F F

T T T T

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-4

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

b) p

q

p∨q

p → (p ∨ q)

T T F F

T F T F

T T T F

T T T T

c) p

q

¬p

p→q

¬p → (p → q)

T T F F

T F T F

F F T T

T F T T

T T T T

d) p

q

p∧q

p→q

(p ∧ q) → (p → q)

T T F F

T F T F

T F F F

T F T T

T T T T

e) p

q

p→q

¬(p → q)

¬(p → q) → p

T T F F

T F T F

T F T T

F T F F

T T T T

f) p q p → q ¬(p → q) ¬q ¬(p → q) → ¬q T T F F

T F T F

T F T T

F T F F

F T F T

T T T T

11. In each case we will show that if the hypothesis is true, then the conclusion is also. a) If the hypothesis p ∧ q is true, then by the definition of conjunction, the conclusion p must also be true. b) If the hypothesis p is true, by the definition of disjunction, the conclusion p ∨ q is also true. c) If the hypothesis ¬p is true, that is, if p is false, then the conclusion p → q is true. d) If the hypothesis p ∧ q is true, then both p and q are true, so the conclusion p → q is also true. e) If the hypothesis ¬(p → q) is true, then p → q is false, so the conclusion p is true (and q is false). f) If the hypothesis ¬(p → q) is true, then p → q is false, so p is true and q is false. Hence, the conclusion ¬q is true. 13. That the fourth column of the truth table shown is identical to the first column proves part (a), and that the sixth column is identical to the first column proves part (b). p

q

p∧q

p ∨ (p ∧ q)

p∨q

p ∧ (p ∨ q)

T T F F

T F T F

T F F F

T T F F

T T T F

T T F F

15. It is a tautology. 17. Each of these is true precisely when p and q have opposite truth values. 19. The proposition

¬p ↔ q is true when ¬p and q have the same truth values, which means that p and q have different truth values. Similarly, p ↔ ¬q is true in exactly the same cases. Therefore, these two expressions are logically equivalent. 21. The proposition ¬(p ↔ q) is true when p ↔ q is false, which means that p and q have different truth values. Because this is precisely when ¬p ↔ q is true, the two expressions are logically equivalent. 23. For (p → r)∧(q → r) to be false, one of the two conditional statements must be false, which happens exactly when r is false and at least one of p and q is true. But these are precisely the cases in which p ∨ q is true and r is false, which is precisely when (p ∨ q) → r is false. Because the two propositions are false in exactly the same situations, they are logically equivalent. 25. For (p → r) ∨ (q → r) to be false, both of the two conditional statements must be false, which happens exactly when r is false and both p and q are true. But this is precisely the case in which p ∧ q is true and r is false, which is precisely when (p ∧ q) → r is false. Because the two propositions are false in exactly the same situations, they are logically equivalent. 27. This fact was observed in Section 1 when the biconditional was first defined. Each of these is true precisely when p and q have the same truth values. 29. The last column is all Ts. (p → q) ∧ (p → q) ∧ (q → r) → p → r (p → r) p q r p → q q → r (q → r) T T T T F F F F

T T F F T T F F

T F T F T F T F

T T F F T T T T

T F T T T F T T

T F F F T F T T

T F T F T T T T

T T T T T T T T

31. These are not logically equivalent because when p, q, and r are all false, (p → q) → r is false, but p → (q → r) is true. 33. Many answers are possible. If we let r be true and p, q, and s be false, then (p → q) → (r → s) will be false, but (p → r) → (q → s) will be true. 35. a) p ∨ ¬q ∨ ¬r b) (p ∨ q ∨ r) ∧ s c) (p ∧T)∨(q ∧F) 37. If we take duals twice, every ∨ changes to an ∧ and then back to an ∨, every ∧ changes to an ∨ and then back to an ∧, every T changes to an F and then back to a T, every F changes to a T and then back to an F. Hence, (s ∗ )∗ = s. 39. Let p and q be equivalent compound propositions involving only the operators ∧, ∨, and ¬, and T and F. Note that ¬p and ¬q are also equivalent. Use De Morgan’s laws as many times as necessary to push negations in as far as possible within these compound propositions, changing ∨s to ∧s, and vice versa, and changing Ts to Fs, and vice versa. This shows that ¬p and ¬q are the same as p∗ and q ∗ except that each atomic proposition pi within them is replaced by its negation. From this we can conclude that p∗ and q ∗ are equivalent because ¬p and ¬q

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-5

are. 41. (p ∧ q ∧ ¬r) ∨ (p ∧ ¬q ∧ r) ∨ (¬p ∧ q ∧ r) 43. Given a compound proposition p, form its truth table and then write down a proposition q in disjunctive normal form that is logically equivalent to p. Because q involves only ¬, ∧, and ∨, this shows that these three operators form a functionally complete set. 45. By Exercise 43, given a compound proposition p, we can write down a proposition q that is logically equivalent to p and involves only ¬, ∧, and ∨. By De Morgan’s law we can eliminate all the ∧’s by replacing each occurrence of p1 ∧ p2 ∧ · · · ∧ pn with ¬(¬p1 ∨ ¬p2 ∨ · · · ∨ ¬pn ). 47. ¬(p ∧ q) is true when either p or q, or both, are false, and is false when both p and q are true. Because this was the definition of p | q, the two compound propositions are logically equivalent. 49. ¬(p ∨ q) is true when both p and q are false, and is false otherwise. Because this was the definition of p ↓ q, the two are logically equivalent. 51. ((p ↓ p) ↓ q) ↓ ((p ↓ p) ↓ q) 53. This follows immediately from the truth table or definition of p | q. 55. 16 57. If the database is open, then either the system is in its initial state or the monitor is put in a closed state. 59. All nine 61. a) Satisfiable b) Not satisfiable c) Not satisfiable 63. Use the same propositions as were given in the text for a 9 × 9 Sudoku puzzle, with the variables indexed from 1 to 4, instead of from 1 to 9, and with a similar the propositions for the 2 × 2 change for blocks: 1r=0 1s=0 4n=1 2i=1 2j =1 p(2r + i, 2s + j, n) 65. 9i=1 p(i, j, n) asserts that column j contains the number n, so 9n=1 9i=1 p(i, j, n) asserts that column j contains all 9 numbers; therefore 9j =1 9n=1 9i=1 p(i, j, n) asserts that every column contains every number.

Section 1.4 1. a) T b) T c) F 3. a) T b) F c) F d) F 5. a) There is a student who spends more than 5 hours every weekday in class. b) Every student spends more than 5 hours every weekday in class. c) There is a student who does not spend more than 5 hours every weekday in class. d) No student spends more than 5 hours every weekday in class. 7. a) Every comedian is funny. b) Every person is a funny comedian. c) There exists a person such that if she or he is a comedian, then she or he is funny. d) Some comedians are funny. 9. a) ∃x(P (x) ∧ Q(x)) b) ∃x(P (x) ∧ ¬Q(x)) c) ∀x(P (x) ∨ Q(x)) d) ∀x¬(P (x) ∨ Q(x)) 11. a) T b) T c) F d) F e) T f) F 13. a) T b) T c) T d) T 15. a) T b) F c) T d) F 17. a) P (0) ∨ P (1) ∨ P (2) ∨ P (3) ∨ P (4) b) P (0) ∧ P (1) ∧ P (2) ∧ P (3) ∧ P (4) c) ¬P (0) ∨ ¬P (1) ∨ ¬P (2) ∨ ¬P (3) ∨ ¬P (4) d) ¬P (0) ∧ ¬P (1) ∧ ¬P (2) ∧¬P (3) ∧ ¬P (4) e) ¬(P (0) ∨ P (1) ∨ P (2) ∨ P (3) ∨ P (4)) f) ¬(P (0) ∧ P (1) ∧ P (2) ∧ P (3) ∧ P (4)) 19. a) P (1) ∨ P (2)∨P (3)∨P (4)∨P (5) b) P (1)∧P (2)∧ P (3) ∧ P (4) ∧ P (5) c) ¬(P (1) ∨P (2) ∨P (3) ∨P (4) ∨P (5)) d) ¬(P (1) ∧ P (2) ∧ P (3) ∧ P (4) ∧ P (5)) e) (P (1) ∧ P (2) ∧ P (4) ∧ P (5)) ∨ (¬P (1) ∨ ¬P (2) ∨ ¬P (3) ∨

¬P (4) ∨ ¬P (5)) 21. Many answers are possible. a) All students in your discrete mathematics class; all students in the world b) All United States senators; all college football players c) George W. Bush and Jeb Bush; all politicians in the United States d) Bill Clinton and George W. Bush; all politicians in the United States 23. Let C(x) be the propositional function “x is in your class.” a) ∃xH (x) and ∃x(C(x) ∧ H (x)), where H (x) is “x can speak Hindi” b) ∀xF (x) and ∀x(C(x) → F (x)), where F (x) is “x is friendly” c) ∃x¬B(x) and ∃x(C(x) ∧ ¬B(x)), where B(x) is “x was born in California” d) ∃xM(x) and ∃x(C(x)∧M(x)), where M(x) is “x has been in a movie” e) ∀x¬L(x) and ∀x(C(x) → ¬L(x)), where L(x) is “x has taken a course in logic programming” 25. Let P (x) be “x is perfect”; let F (x) be “x is your friend”; and let the domain be all people. a) ∀x ¬P (x) b) ¬∀x P (x) c) ∀x(F (x) → P (x)) d) ∃x(F (x) ∧ P (x)) e) ∀x(F (x) ∧ P (x)) or (∀x F (x)) ∧ (∀x P (x)) f) (¬∀x F (x)) ∨ (∃x ¬P (x)) 27. Let Y (x) be the propositional function that x is in your school or class, as appropriate. a) If we let V (x) be “x has lived in Vietnam,” then we have ∃xV (x) if the domain is just your schoolmates, or ∃x(Y (x) ∧ V (x)) if the domain is all people. If we let D(x, y) mean that person x has lived in country y, then we can rewrite this last one as ∃x(Y (x) ∧ D(x, Vietnam)). b) If we let H (x) be “x can speak Hindi,” then we have ∃x¬H (x) if the domain is just your schoolmates, or ∃x(Y (x) ∧ ¬H (x)) if the domain is all people. If we let S(x, y) mean that person x can speak language y, then we can rewrite this last one as ∃x(Y (x) ∧ ¬S(x, Hindi)). c) If we let J (x), P (x), and C(x) be the propositional functions asserting x’s knowledge of Java, Prolog, and C++, respectively, then we have ∃x(J (x) ∧ P (x) ∧ C(x)) if the domain is just your schoolmates, or ∃x(Y (x) ∧ J (x) ∧ P (x) ∧ C(x)) if the domain is all people. If we let K(x, y) mean that person x knows programming language y, then we can rewrite this last one as ∃x(Y (x) ∧ K(x, Java) ∧ K(x, Prolog) ∧K(x, C++)). d) If we let T (x) be “x enjoys Thai food,” then we have ∀x T (x) if the domain is just your classmates, or ∀x(Y (x) → T (x)) if the domain is all people. If we let E(x, y) mean that person x enjoys food of type y, then we can rewrite this last one as ∀x(Y (x) → E(x, Thai)). e) If we let H (x) be “x plays hockey,” then we have ∃x ¬H (x) if the domain is just your classmates, or ∃x(Y (x) ∧ ¬H (x)) if the domain is all people. If we let P (x, y) mean that person x plays game y, then we can rewrite this last one as ∃x(Y (x) ∧ ¬P (x, hockey)). 29. Let T (x) mean that x is a tautology and C(x) mean that x is a contradiction. a) ∃x T (x) b) ∀x(C(x) → T (¬x)) c) ∃x∃y(¬T (x) ∧ ¬C(x) ∧ ¬T (y) ∧ ¬C(y)∧T (x ∨ y)) d) ∀x∀y((T (x) ∧T (y)) → T (x∧y)) 31. a) Q(0,0,0) ∧ Q(0,1,0) b) Q(0,1,1) ∨Q(1, 1, 1) ∨ Q(2, 1, 1) c) ¬Q(0, 0, 0) ∨ ¬Q(0, 0, 1) d) ¬Q(0, 0, 1) ∨ ¬Q(1, 0, 1) ∨ ¬Q(2,0,1) 33. a) Let T (x) be the predicate that x can learn new tricks, and let the domain be old dogs. Original is ∃x T (x). Negation is ∀x ¬T (x): “No old dogs can learn new tricks.” b) Let C(x) be the predicate that x knows calculus, and let the domain be rabbits. Original is ¬∃x C(x).

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-6

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

Negation is ∃x C(x): “There is a rabbit that knows calculus.” c) Let F (x) be the predicate that x can fly, and let the domain be birds. Original is ∀x F (x). Negation is ∃x ¬F (x): “There is a bird who cannot fly.” d) Let T (x) be the predicate that x can talk, and let the domain be dogs. Original is ¬∃x T (x). Negation is ∃x T (x): “There is a dog that talks.” e) Let F (x) and R(x) be the predicates that x knows French and knows Russian, respectively, and let the domain be people in this class. Original is ¬∃x(F (x) ∧ R(x)). Negation is ∃x(F (x) ∧ R(x)): “There is someone in this class who knows French and Russian.” 35. a) There is no counterexample. b) x = 0 c) x = 2 37. a) ∀x((F (x, 25,000) ∨ S(x, 25)) → E(x)), where E(x) is “Person x qualifies as an elite flyer in a given year,” F (x, y) is “Person x flies more than y miles in a given year,” and S(x, y) is “Person x takes more than y flights in a given year” b) ∀x(((M(x) ∧ T (x, 3)) ∨ (¬M(x) ∧ T (x, 3.5))) → Q(x)), where Q(x) is “Person x qualifies for the marathon,” M(x) is “Person x is a man,” and T (x, y) is “Person x has run the marathon in less than y hours” c) M → ((H (60) ∨ (H (45) ∧ T )) ∧ ∀y G(B, y)), where M is the proposition “The student received a masters degree,” H (x) is “The student took at least x course hours,” T is the proposition “The student wrote a thesis,” and G(x, y) is “The person got grade x or higher in course y” d) ∃x ((T (x, 21) ∧ G(x, 4.0)), where T (x, y) is “Person x took more than y credit hours” and G(x, p) is “Person x earned grade point average p” (we assume that we are talking about one given semester) 39. a) If there is a printer that is both out of service and busy, then some job has been lost. b) If every printer is busy, then there is a job in the queue. c) If there is a job that is both queued and lost, then some printer is out of service. d) If every printer is busy and every job is queued, then some job is lost. 41. a) (∃x F (x, 10)) → ∃x S(x), where F (x, y) is “Disk x has more than y kilobytes of free space,” and S(x) is “Mail message x can be saved” b) (∃x A(x)) → ∀x(Q(x) → T (x)), where A(x) is “Alert x is active,” Q(x) is “Message x is queued,” and T (x) is “Message x is transmitted” c) ∀x((x = main console) → T (x)), where T (x) is “The diagnostic monitor tracks the status of system x” d) ∀x(¬L(x) → B(x)), where L(x) is “The host of the conference call put participant x on a special list” and B(x) is “Participant x was billed” 43. They are not equivalent. Let P (x) be any propositional function that is sometimes true and sometimes false, and let Q(x) be any propositional function that is always false. Then ∀x(P (x) → Q(x)) is false but ∀xP (x) → ∀xQ(x) is true. 45. Both statements are true precisely when at least one of P (x) and Q(x) is true for at least one value of x in the domain. 47. a) If A is true, then both sides are logically equivalent to ∀xP (x). If A is false, the left-hand side is clearly false. Furthermore, for every x, P (x) ∧ A is false, so the right-hand side is false. Hence, the two sides are logically equivalent. b) If A is true, then both sides are logically equivalent to ∃x P (x). If A is false, the left-hand side is clearly false. Furthermore, for every x, P (x) ∧ A is false, so ∃x(P (x) ∧ A) is false. Hence, the two sides are logically equivalent. 49. We can establish these equivalences by arguing that one side is true if and only if the

other side is true. a) Suppose that A is true. Then for each x, P (x) → A is true; therefore the left-hand side is always true in this case. By similar reasoning the right-hand side is always true in this case. Therefore, the two propositions are logically equivalent when A is true. On the other hand, suppose that A is false. There are two subcases. If P (x) is false for every x, then P (x) → A is vacuously true, so the left-hand side is vacuously true. The same reasoning shows that the right-hand side is also true, because in this subcase ∃xP (x) is false. For the second subcase, suppose that P (x) is true for some x. Then for that x, P (x) → A is false, so the left-hand side is false. The right-hand side is also false, because in this subcase ∃xP (x) is true but A is false. Thus in all cases, the two propositions have the same truth value. b) If A is true, then both sides are trivially true, because the conditional statements have true conclusions. If A is false, then there are two subcases. If P (x) is false for some x, then P (x) → A is vacuously true for that x, so the left-hand side is true. The same reasoning shows that the right-hand side is true, because in this subcase ∀xP (x) is false. For the second subcase, suppose that P (x) is true for every x. Then for every x, P (x) → A is false, so the left-hand side is false (there is no x making the conditional statement true). The right-hand side is also false, because it is a conditional statement with a true hypothesis and a false conclusion. Thus in all cases, the two propositions have the same truth value. 51. To show these are not logically equivalent, let P (x) be the statement “x is positive,” and let Q(x) be the statement “x is negative” with domain the set of integers. Then ∃x P (x) ∧ ∃x Q(x) is true, but ∃x(P (x) ∧ Q(x)) is false. 53. a) True b) False, unless the domain consists of just one element c) True 55. a) Yes b) No c) juana, kiko d) math273, cs301 e) juana, kiko 57. sibling(X,Y) :- mother(M,X), mother(M,Y), father(F,X), father(F,Y) 59. a) ∀x(P (x) → ¬Q(x)) b) ∀x(Q(x) → R(x)) c) ∀x(P (x) → ¬R(x)) d) The conclusion does not follow. There may be vain professors, because the premises do not rule out the possibility that there are other vain people besides ignorant ones. 61. a) ∀x(P (x) → ¬Q(x)) b) ∀x(R(x) → ¬S(x)) c) ∀x(¬Q(x) →S(x)) d) ∀x(P (x) → ¬R(x)) e) The conclusion follows. Suppose x is a baby. Then by the first premise, x is illogical, so by the third premise, x is despised. The second premise says that if x could manage a crocodile, then x would not be despised. Therefore, x cannot manage a crocodile.

Section 1.5 1. a) For every real number x there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. b) For every real number x and real number y, if x and y are both nonnegative, then their product is nonnegative. c) For every real number x and real number y, there exists a real number z such that xy = z. 3. a) There

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-7

is some student in your class who has sent a message to some student in your class. b) There is some student in your class who has sent a message to every student in your class. c) Every student in your class has sent a message to at least one student in your class. d) There is a student in your class who has been sent a message by every student in your class. e) Every student in your class has been sent a message from at least one student in your class. f) Every student in the class has sent a message to every student in the class. 5. a) Sarah Smith has visited www.att.com. b) At least one person has visited www.imdb.org. c) Jose Orez has visited at least one website. d) There is a website that both Ashok Puri and Cindy Yoon have visited. e) There is a person besides David Belcher who has visited all the websites that David Belcher has visited. f) There are two different people who have visited exactly the same websites. 7. a) Abdallah Hussein does not like Japanese cuisine. b) Some student at your school likes Korean cuisine, and everyone at your school likes Mexican cuisine. c) There is some cuisine that either Monique Arsenault or Jay Johnson likes. d) For every pair of distinct students at your school, there is some cuisine that at least one them does not like. e) There are two students at your school who like exactly the same set of cuisines. f) For every pair of students at your school, there is some cuisine about which they have the same opinion (either they both like it or they both do not like it). 9. a) ∀xL(x, Jerry) b) ∀x∃yL(x, y) c) ∃y∀xL(x, y) d) ∀x∃y¬L(x, y) e) ∃x¬L(Lydia, x) f) ∃x∀y¬L(y, x) g) ∃x(∀yL(y, x) ∧ ∀z((∀wL(w, z)) → z = x)) h) ∃x∃y(x = y ∧ L(Lynn, x) ∧ L(Lynn, y) ∧ ∀z(L(Lynn, z) → (z = x ∨ z = y))) i) ∀xL(x, x) j) ∃x ∀ y (L(x,y) ↔ x = y) 11. a) A(Lois, Professor Michaels) b) ∀x(S(x) → A(x, Professor Gross)) c) ∀x(F (x) → (A(x, Professor Miller) ∨ A(Professor Miller, x))) d) ∃x(S(x) ∧ ∀y(F (y) → ¬A(x, y))) e) ∃x(F (x) ∧ ∀y(S(y) → ¬A(y,x))) f) ∀y(F (y) →∃x(S(x) ∨ A(x,y))) g) ∃x(F (x) ∧ ∀y((F (y) ∧ (y = x)) → A(x,y))) h) ∃x(S(x) ∧ ∀y(F (y) → ¬A(y, x))) 13. a) ¬M (Chou, Koko) b) ¬M(Arlene, Sarah) ∧ ¬T (Arlene, Sarah) c) ¬M (Deborah, Jose) d) ∀xM(x, Ken) e) ∀x¬T (x, Nina) f) ∀x(T -x,Avi) ∨M(x, Avi)) g) ∃x∀y(y = x → M(x, y)) h) ∃x∀y(y = x → (M(x, y) ∨ T (x, y))) i) ∃x∃y(x = y ∧ M(x, y) ∧ M(y, x)) j) ∃xM(x, x) k) ∃x∀y(x = y → (¬M(x, y) ∧ ¬T (y, x))) l) ∀x(∃y(x = y ∧ (M(y, x) ∨ T (y, x)))) m) ∃x∃y(x = y ∧ M(x, y) ∧ T (y, x)) n) ∃x∃y(x = y ∧ ∀z((z = x ∧ z = y) → (M (x, z) ∨ M (y, z) ∨ T (x, z) ∨ T (y, z)))) 15. a) ∀xP (x), where P (x) is “x needs a course in discrete mathematics” and the domain consists of all computer science students b) ∃xP (x), where P (x) is “x owns a personal computer” and the domain consists of all students in this class c) ∀x∃yP (x, y), where P (x, y) is “x has taken y,” the domain for x consists of all students in this class, and the domain for y consists of all computer science classes d) ∃x∃yP (x, y), where P (x, y) and domains are the same as in part (c) e) ∀x∀yP (x, y), where P (x, y) is “x has been in y,” the domain for x consists of all students in this class, and the domain for y consists of all buildings on campus f) ∃x∃y∀z(P (z, y) → Q(x, z)), where P (z, y) is “z is in

y” and Q(x, z) is “x has been in z”; the domain for x consists of all students in the class, the domain for y consists of all buildings on campus, and the domain of z consists of all rooms. g) ∀x∀y∃z(P (z, y) ∧ Q(x, z)), with same environment as in part (f) 17. a) ∀u∃m(A(u, m) ∧ ∀n(n = m → ¬A(u, n))), where A(u, m) means that user u has access to mailbox m b) ∃p∀e(H (e) ∧ S(p, running)) → S (kernel, working correctly), where H (e) means that error condition e is in effect and S(x, y) means that the status of x is y c) ∀u∀s(E(s, .edu) → A(u, s)), where E(s, x) means that website s has extension x, and A(u, s) means that user u can access website s d) ∃x∃y(x = y ∧ ∀z((∀s M(z,s)) ↔ (z = x ∨ z = y))), where M(a, b) means that system a monitors remote server b 19. a) ∀x∀y((x < 0) ∧ (y < 0) → (x + y < 0)) b) ¬∀x∀y ((x > 0) ∧ (y > 0) → (x − y > 0)) c) ∀x∀y (x 2 + y 2 ≥ (x + y)2 ) d) ∀x∀y (|xy| = |x||y|) 21. ∀x∃a∃b∃c∃d ((x > 0) → x = a 2 + b2 + c2 + d 2 ), where the domain consists of all integers 23. a) ∀x ∀y ((x < 0) ∧ (y < 0) → (xy > 0)) b) ∀x(x − x = 0) c) ∀x∃a∃b(a = b ∧ ∀c(c2 = x ↔ (c = a ∨ c = b))) d) ∀x((x < 0) → ¬∃y(x = y 2 )) 25. a) There is a multiplicative identity for the real numbers. b) The product of two negative real numbers is always a positive real number. c) There exist real numbers x and y such that x 2 exceeds y but x is less than y. d) The real numbers are closed under the operation of addition. 27. a) True b) True c) True d) True e) True f) False g) False h) True i) False 29. a) P (1,1) ∧ P (1,2) ∧ P (1,3) ∧ P (2,1) ∧ P (2,2) ∧ P (2, 3) ∧ P (3, 1) ∧ P (3, 2) ∧ P (3, 3) b) P (1, 1) ∨ P (1, 2) ∨ P (1, 3) ∨ P (2, 1) ∨ P (2, 2) ∨ P (2, 3) ∨ P (3,1) ∨ P (3, 2) ∨ P (3, 3) c) (P (1, 1) ∧ P (1, 2) ∧ P (1, 3)) ∨ (P (2 , 1) ∧ P (2, 2) ∧ P (2, 3))∨(P (3, 1) ∧ P (3, 2) ∧ P (3, 3)) d) (P (1, 1) ∨ P (2, 1) ∨ P (3, 1)) ∧ (P (1, 2) ∨ P (2, 2) ∨ P (3, 2)) ∧ (P (1, 3) ∨ P (2, 3) ∨ P (3, 3)) 31. a) ∃x∀y∃z ¬T (x, y, z) b) ∃x∀y¬P (x, y) ∧ ∃x∀y ¬ Q(x, y) c) ∃x∀y (¬P (x, y) ∨ ∀z ¬R(x, y, z)) d) ∃x∀y(P (x, y) ∧ ¬Q(x, y)) 33. a) ∃x∃y¬P (x, y) b) ∃y∀x¬P (x, y) c) ∃y∃x(¬P (x, y) ∧ ¬Q(x, y)) d) (∀x∀yP (x, y)) ∨ (∃x∃y¬Q(x, y)) e) ∃x(∀y∃z¬P (x,y,z) ∨ ∀z∃y¬P (x, y, z)) 35. Any domain with four or more members makes the statement true; any domain with three or fewer members makes the statement false. 37. a) There is someone in this class such that for every two different math courses, these are not the two and only two math courses this person has taken. b) Every person has either visited Libya or has not visited a country other than Libya. c) Someone has climbed every mountain in the Himalayas. d) There is someone who has neither been in a movie with Kevin Bacon nor has been in a movie with someone who has been in a movie with Kevin Bacon. 39. a) x = 2, y = −2 b) x = −4 c) x = 17, y = −1 41. ∀x ∀y ∀ z((x·y) ·z = x · (y · z)) 43. ∀m∀b(m = 0 → ∃x(mx + b = 0 ∧ ∀w(mw + b = 0 → w = x))) 45. a) True b) False c) True 47. ¬(∃x∀yP (x, y)) ↔ ∀x(¬∀yP (x, y)) ↔ ∀x∃y¬P (x,y) 49. a) Suppose that ∀xP (x) ∧ ∃xQ(x) is true. Then P (x) is

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-8

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

true for all x and there is an element y for which Q(y) is true. Because P (x)∧Q(y) is true for all x and there is a y for which Q(y) is true, ∀x∃y(P (x) ∧ Q(y)) is true. Conversely, suppose that the second proposition is true. Let x be an element in the domain. There is a y such that Q(y) is true, so ∃xQ(x) is true. Because ∀xP (x) is also true, it follows that the first proposition is true. b) Suppose that ∀xP (x) ∨ ∃xQ(x) is true. Then either P (x) is true for all x, or there exists a y for which Q(y) is true. In the former case, P (x) ∨ Q(y) is true for all x, so ∀x∃y(P (x) ∨ Q(y)) is true. In the latter case, Q(y) is true for a particular y, so P (x) ∨ Q(y) is true for all x and consequently ∀x∃y(P (x) ∨ Q(y)) is true. Conversely, suppose that the second proposition is true. If P (x) is true for all x, then the first proposition is true. If not, P (x) is false for some x, and for this x there must be a y such that P (x)∨Q(y) is true. Hence, Q(y) must be true, so ∃yQ(y) is true. It follows that the first proposition must hold. 51. We will show how an expression can be put into prenex normal form (PNF) if subexpressions in it can be put into PNF. Then, working from the inside out, any expression can be put in PNF. (To formalize the argument, it is necessary to use the method of structural induction that will be discussed in Section 5.3.) By Exercise 45 of Section 1.4, we can assume that the proposition uses only ∨ and ¬ as logical connectives. Now note that any proposition with no quantifiers is already in PNF. (This is the basis case of the argument.) Now suppose that the proposition is of the form QxP (x), where Q is a quantifier. Because P (x) is a shorter expression than the original proposition, we can put it into PNF. Then Qx followed by this PNF is again in PNF and is equivalent to the original proposition. Next, suppose that the proposition is of the form ¬P . If P is already in PNF, we slide the negation sign past all the quantifiers using the equivalences in Table 2 in Section 1.4. Finally, assume that proposition is of the form P ∨ Q, where each of P and Q is in PNF. If only one of P and Q has quantifiers, then we can use Exercise 46 in Section 1.4 to bring the quantifier in front of both. If both P and Q have quantifiers, we can use Exercise 45 in Section 1.4, Exercise 48, or part (b) of Exercise 49 to rewrite P ∨ Q with two quantifiers preceding the disjunction of a proposition of the form R ∨ S, and then put R ∨ S into PNF.

Section 1.6 1. Modus ponens; valid; the conclusion is true, because the hypotheses are true. 3. a) Addition b) Simplification c) Modus ponens d) Modus tollens e) Hypothetical syllogism 5. Let w be “Randy works hard,” let d be “Randy is a dull boy,” and let j be “Randy will get the job.” The hypotheses are w, w → d, and d → ¬j . Using modus ponens and the first two hypotheses, d follows. Using modus ponens and the last hypothesis, ¬j , which is the desired conclusion, “Randy

will not get the job,” follows. 7. Universal instantiation is used to conclude that “If Socrates is a man, then Socrates is mortal.” Modus ponens is then used to conclude that Socrates is mortal. 9. a) Valid conclusions are “I did not take Tuesday off,” “I took Thursday off,” “It rained on Thursday.” b) “I did not eat spicy foods and it did not thunder” is a valid conclusion. c) “I am clever” is a valid conclusion. d) “Ralph is not a CS major” is a valid conclusion. e) “That you buy lots of stuff is good for the U.S. and is good for you” is a valid conclusion. f) “Mice gnaw their food” and “Rabbits are not rodents” are valid conclusions. 11. Suppose that p1 , p2 , . . . , pn are true. We want to establish that q → r is true. If q is false, then we are done, vacuously. Otherwise, q is true, so by the validity of the given argument form (that whenever p1 , p2 , . . . , pn , q are true, then r must be true), we know that r is true. 13. a) Let c(x) be “x is in this class,” j (x) be “x knows how to write programs in JAVA,” and h(x) be “x can get a high-paying job.” The premises are c(Doug), j (Doug), ∀x(j (x) → h(x)). Using universal instantiation and the last premise, j (Doug) → h(Doug) follows. Applying modus ponens to this conclusion and the second premise, h(Doug) follows. Using conjunction and the first premise, c(Doug) ∧ h(Doug) follows. Finally, using existential generalization, the desired conclusion, ∃x(c(x) ∧ h(x)) follows. b) Let c(x) be “x is in this class,” w(x) be “x enjoys whale watching,” and p(x) be “x cares about ocean pollution.” The premises are ∃x(c(x) ∧ w(x)) and ∀x(w(x) → p(x)). From the first premise, c(y) ∧ w(y) for a particular person y. Using simplification, w(y) follows. Using the second premise and universal instantiation, w(y) → p(y) follows. Using modus ponens, p(y) follows, and by conjunction, c(y) ∧ p(y) follows. Finally, by existential generalization, the desired conclusion, ∃x(c(x) ∧ p(x)), follows. c) Let c(x) be “x is in this class,” p(x) be “x owns a PC,” and w(x) be “x can use a word-processing program.” The premises are c(Zeke), ∀x(c(x) → p(x)), and ∀x(p(x) → w(x)). Using the second premise and universal instantiation, c(Zeke) → p(Zeke) follows. Using the first premise and modus ponens, p(Zeke) follows. Using the third premise and universal instantiation, p(Zeke) → w(Zeke) follows. Finally, using modus ponens, w(Zeke), the desired conclusion, follows. d) Let j (x) be “x is in New Jersey,” f (x) be “x lives within 50 miles of the ocean,” and s(x) be “x has seen the ocean.” The premises are ∀x(j (x) → f (x)) and ∃x(j (x) ∧ ¬s(x)). The second hypothesis and existential instantiation imply that j (y) ∧ ¬s(y) for a particular person y. By simplification, j (y) for this person y. Using universal instantiation and the first premise, j (y) → f (y), and by modus ponens, f (y) follows. By simplification, ¬s(y) follows from j (y) ∧ ¬s(y). So f (y) ∧ ¬s(y) follows by conjunction. Finally, the desired conclusion, ∃x(f (x) ∧ ¬s(x)), follows by existential generalization. 15. a) Correct, using universal instantiation and modus ponens b) Invalid; fallacy of affirming the conclusion c) Invalid; fallacy of denying the hypothesis d) Correct, using universal instantiation and modus tollens 17. We know that some x exists that makes

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-9

H (x) true, but we cannot conclude that Lola is one such x. 19. a) Fallacy of affirming the conclusion b) Fallacy of begging the question c) Valid argument using modus tollens d) Fallacy of denying the hypothesis 21. By the second premise, there is some lion that does not drink coffee. Let Leo be such a creature. By simplification we know that Leo is a lion. By modus ponens we know from the first premise that Leo is fierce. Hence, Leo is fierce and does not drink coffee. By the definition of the existential quantifier, there exist fierce creatures that do not drink coffee, that is, some fierce creatures do not drink coffee. 23. The error occurs in step (5), because we cannot assume, as is being done here, that the c that makes P true is the same as the c that makes Q true. 25. We are given the premises ∀x(P (x) → Q(x)) and ¬Q(a). We want to show ¬P (a). Suppose, to the contrary, that ¬P (a) is not true. Then P (a) is true. Therefore by universal modus ponens, we have Q(a). But this contradicts the given premise ¬Q(a). Therefore our supposition must have been wrong, and so ¬P (a) is true, as desired. 27. Step 1. ∀x(P (x) ∧ R(x)) 2. P (a) ∧ R(a) 3. P (a) 4. ∀x(P (x) → (Q(x) ∧ S(x))) 5. Q(a) ∧ S(a) 6. S(a) 7. R(a) 8. R(a) ∧ S(a) 9. ∀x(R(x) ∧ S(x))

Reason Premise Universal instantiation from (1) Simplification from (2) Premise Universal modus ponens from (3) and (4) Simplification from (5) Simplification from (2) Conjunction from (7) and (6) Universal generalization from (5)

29. Step 1. ∃x¬P (x) 2. ¬P (c) 3. ∀x(P (x) ∨ Q(x)) 4. P (c) ∨ Q(c) 5. Q(c)

Reason Premise Existential instantiation from (1) Premise Universal instantiation from (3) Disjunctive syllogism from (4) and (2) 6. ∀x(¬Q(x) ∨ S(x)) Premise 7. ¬Q(c) ∨ S(c) Universal instantiation from (6) 8. S(c) Disjunctive syllogism from (5) and (7) 9. ∀x(R(x) → ¬S(x)) Premise 10. R(c) → ¬S(c) Universal instantiation from (9) 11. ¬R(c) Modus tollens from (8) and (10) 12. ∃x¬R(x) Existential generalization from (11)

31. Let p be “It is raining”; let q be “Yvette has her umbrella”; let r be “Yvette gets wet.” Assumptions are ¬p ∨ q, ¬q ∨ ¬r, and p ∨ ¬r. Resolution on the first two gives ¬p ∨ ¬r. Resolution on this and the third assumption gives ¬r, as desired. 33. Assume that this proposition is satisfiable. Using resolution on the first two clauses enables us to conclude q ∨ q; in other words, we know that q has to be true. Using resolution on the last two clauses enables us to conclude ¬q ∨ ¬q; in other

words, we know that ¬q has to be true. This is a contradiction. So this proposition is not satisfiable. 35. Valid

Section 1.7 1. Let n = 2k + 1 and m = 2l + 1 be odd integers. Then n + m = 2(k + l + 1) is even. 3. Suppose that n is even. Then n = 2k for some integer k. Therefore, n2 = (2k)2 = 4k 2 = 2(2k 2 ). Because we have written n2 as 2 times an integer, we conclude that n2 is even. 5. Direct proof: Suppose that m+n and n+p are even. Then m+n = 2s for some integer s and n + p = 2t for some integer t. If we add these, we get m + p + 2n = 2s + 2t. Subtracting 2n from both sides and factoring, we have m + p = 2s + 2t − 2n = 2(s + t − n). Because we have written m + p as 2 times an integer, we conclude that m + p is even. 7. Because n is odd, we can write n = 2k + 1 for some integer k. Then (k + 1)2 − k 2 = k 2 + 2k + 1 − k 2 = 2k + 1 = n. 9. Suppose that r is rational and i is irrational and s = r + i is rational. Then by Example 7, s +(−r) √ √= i is rational, which is √a contradiction. 11. Because 2 · 2 = 2 is rational and 2 is irrational, the product of two irrational numbers is not necessarily irrational. 13. Proof by contraposition: If 1/x were rational, then by definition 1/x = p/q for some integers p and q with q = 0. Because 1/x cannot be 0 (if it were, then we’d have the contradiction 1 = x · 0 by multiplying both sides by x), we know that p = 0. Now x = 1/(1/x) = 1/(p/q) = q/p by the usual rules of algebra and arithmetic. Hence, x can be written as the quotient of two integers with the denominator nonzero. Thus by definition, x is rational. 15. Assume that it is not true that x ≥ 1 or y ≥ 1. Then x < 1 and y < 1. Adding these two inequalities, we obtain x + y < 2, which is the negation of x + y ≥ 2. 17. a) Assume that n is odd, so n = 2k + 1 for some integer k. Then n3 +5 = 2(4k 3 +6k 2 +3k +3). Because n3 + 5 is two times some integer, it is even. b) Suppose that n3 + 5 is odd and n is odd. Because n is odd and the product of two odd numbers is odd, it follows that n2 is odd and then that n3 is odd. But then 5 = (n3 + 5) − n3 would have to be even because it is the difference of two odd numbers. Therefore, the supposition that n3 + 5 and n were both odd is wrong. 19. The proposition is vacuously true because 0 is not a positive integer. Vacuous proof. 21. P (1) is true because (a + b)1 = a + b ≥ a 1 + b1 = a + b. Direct proof. 23. If we chose 9 or fewer days on each day of the week, this would account for at most 9 · 7 = 63 days. But we chose 64 days. This contradiction shows that at least 10 of the days we chose must be on the same day of the week. 25. Suppose by way of contradiction that a/b is a rational root, where a and b are integers and this fraction is in lowest terms (that is, a and b have no common divisor greater than 1). Plug this proposed root into the equation to obtain a 3 /b3 + a/b + 1 = 0. Multiply through by b3 to obtain a 3 + ab2 + b3 = 0. If a and b are both odd, then the left-hand side is the sum of three odd numbers and therefore must be odd. If a is odd and b is even, then the left-hand side is odd + even + even, which is again odd. Similarly, if a is even and b is odd, then the left-hand

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-10

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

side is even + even + odd, which is again odd. Because the fraction a/b is in simplest terms, it cannot happen that both a and b are even. Thus in all cases, the left-hand side is odd, and therefore cannot equal 0. This contradiction shows that no such root exists. 27. First, assume that n is odd, so that n = 2k +1 for some integer k. Then 5n+6 = 5(2k + 1)+ 6 = 10k + 11 = 2(5k + 5) + 1. Hence, 5n + 6 is odd. To prove the converse, suppose that n is even, so that n = 2k for some integer k. Then 5n + 6 = 10k + 6 = 2(5k + 3), so 5n + 6 is even. Hence, n is odd if and only if 5n + 6 is odd. 29. This proposition is true. Suppose that m is neither 1 nor −1. Then mn has a factor m larger than 1. On the other hand, mn = 1, and 1 has no such factor. Hence, m = 1 or m = −1. In the first case n = 1, and in the second case n = −1, because n = 1/m. 31. We prove that all these are equivalent to x being even. If x is even, then x = 2k for some integer k. Therefore 3x + 2 = 3 · 2k + 2 = 6k + 2 = 2(3k + 1), which is even, because it has been written in the form 2t, where t = 3k + 1. Similarly, x + 5 = 2k + 5 = 2k + 4 + 1 = 2(k + 2) + 1, so x + 5 is odd; and x 2 = (2k)2 = 2(2k 2 ), so x 2 is even. For the converses, we will use a proof by contraposition. So assume that x is not even; thus x is odd and we can write x = 2k + 1 for some integer k. Then 3x +2 = 3(2k +1)+2 = 6k +5 = 2(3k +2)+1, which is odd (i.e., not even), because it has been written in the form 2t + 1, where t = 3k + 2. Similarly, x + 5 = 2k + 1 + 5 = 2(k + 3), so x + 5 is even (i.e., not odd). That x 2 is odd was already proved in Example 1. 33. We give proofs by contraposition of (i ) → (ii), (ii) → (i ), (i ) → (iii ), and (iii ) → (i ). For the first of these, suppose that 3x + 2 is rational, namely, equal to p/q for some integers p and q with q = 0. Then we can write x = ((p/q) − 2)/3 = (p − 2q)/(3q), where 3q = 0. This shows that x is rational. For the second conditional statement, suppose that x is rational, namely, equal to p/q for some integers p and q with q = 0. Then we can write 3x +2 = (3p +2q)/q, where q = 0. This shows that 3x +2 is rational. For the third conditional statement, suppose that x/2 is rational, namely, equal to p/q for some integers p and q with q = 0. Then we can write x = 2p/q, where q = 0. This shows that x is rational. And for the fourth conditional statement, suppose that x is rational, namely, equal to p/q for some integers p and q with q = 0. Then we can write x/2 = p/(2q), where 2q = 0. This shows that x/2 is rational. 35. No 37. Suppose that p1 → p4 → p2 → p5 → p3 → p1 . To prove that one of these propositions implies any of the others, just use hypothetical syllogism repeatedly. 39. We will give a proof by contradiction. Suppose that a1 , a2 , . . . , an are all less than A, where A is the average of these numbers. Then a1 + a2 + · · · + an < nA. Dividing both sides by n shows that A = (a1 + a2 + · · · + an )/n < A, which is a contradiction. 41. We will show that the four statements are equivalent by showing that (i ) implies (ii ), (ii ) implies (iii ), (iii ) implies (iv), and (iv) implies (i). First, assume that n is even. Then n = 2k for some integer k. Then n + 1 = 2k + 1, so n + 1 is odd. This shows that (i) implies (ii ). Next, suppose that n + 1 is odd, so n + 1 = 2k + 1 for some integer k. Then 3n + 1 = 2n + (n + 1) = 2(n + k) + 1, which

shows that 3n + 1 is odd, showing that (ii ) implies (iii ). Next, suppose that 3n + 1 is odd, so 3n + 1 = 2k + 1 for some integer k. Then 3n = (2k + 1) − 1 = 2k, so 3n is even. This shows that (iii ) implies (iv). Finally, suppose that n is not even. Then n is odd, so n = 2k + 1 for some integer k. Then 3n = 3(2k + 1) = 6k + 3 = 2(3k + 1) + 1, so 3n is odd. This completes a proof by contraposition that (iv) implies (i).

Section 1.8 1. 12 + 1 = 2 ≥ 2 = 21 ; 22 + 1 = 5 ≥ 4 = 22 ; 32 + 1 = 10 ≥ 8 = 23 ; 42 + 1 = 17 ≥ 16 = 24 3. If x ≤ y, then max(x, y) + min(x, y) = y + x = x + y. If x ≥ y, then max(x, y) + min(x, y) = x + y. Because these are the only two cases, the equality always holds. 5. Because |x − y| = |y − x|, the values of x and y are interchangeable. Therefore, without loss of generality, we can assume that x ≥ y. Then (x + y − (x − y))/2 = (x + y − x + y)/2 = 2y/2 = y = min(x, y). Similarly, (x + y + (x − y))/2 = (x + y + x − y)/2 = 2x/2 = x = max(x, y). 7. There are four cases. Case 1: x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0. Then |x| + |y| = x + y = |x + y|. Case 2: x < 0 and y < 0. Then |x| + |y| = −x + (−y) = −(x + y) = |x + y| because x+y < 0. Case 3: x ≥ 0 and y < 0. Then |x|+|y| = x+(−y). If x ≥ −y, then |x + y| = x + y. But because y < 0, −y > y, so |x| + |y| = x + (−y) > x + y = |x + y|. If x < −y, then |x +y| = −(x +y) = −x +(−y). But because x ≥ 0, x ≥ −x, so |x|+|y| = x + (−y) ≥ −x + (−y) = |x +y|. Case 4: x < 0 and y ≥ 0. Identical to Case 3 with the roles of x and y reversed. 9. 10,001, 10,002, . . . , 10,100 are all nonsquares, because 1002 = 10,000 and 1012 = 10,201; constructive. √ 3 2 11. 8 = 13. Let x = 2 and y = √ 2. If √ 2 and 9 = 3 2 and x y =√2 2 is irrational, we√are√done. If not, √ then √ let x = 2 √ y 2 2/4 2·( 2)/4 1/2 =2 = 2 = 2. y = 2/4. Then x = (2 ) 15. a) This statement asserts the existence of x with a certain property. If we let y = x, then we see that P (x) is true. If y is anything other than x, then P (x) is not true. Thus, x is the unique element that makes P true. b) The first clause here says that there is an element that makes P true. The second clause says that whenever two elements both make P true, they are in fact the same element. Together these say that P is satisfied by exactly one element. c) This statement asserts the existence of an x that makes P true and has the further property that whenever we find an element that makes P true, that element is x. In other words, x is the unique element that makes P true. 17. The equation |a − c| = |b − c| is equivalent to the disjunction of two equations: a − c = b − c or a − c = −b + c. The first of these is equivalent to a = b, which contradicts the assumptions made in this problem, so the original equation is equivalent to a − c = −b + c. By adding b + c to both sides and dividing by 2, we see that this equation is equivalent to c = (a + b)/2. Thus, there is a

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-11

unique solution. Furthermore, this c is an integer, because the sum of the odd integers a and b is even. 19. We are being asked to solve n = (k − 2) + (k + 3) for k. Using the usual, reversible, rules of algebra, we see that this equation is equivalent to k = (n − 1)/2. In other words, this is the one and only value of k that makes our equation true. Because n is odd, n − 1 is even, so k is an integer. 21. If x is itself an integer, then we can take n = x and = 0. No other solution is possible in this case, because if the integer n is greater than x, then n is at least x + 1, which would make ≥ 1. If x is not an integer, then round it up to the next integer, and call that integer n. Let = n − x. Clearly 0 ≤ < 1; this is the only that will work with this n, and n cannot be any larger, because is constrained to be less than 1. 23. The harmonic mean of distinct positive real numbers x and y is always less √ than their geometric mean. To prove 2xy/(x + y) < xy, √ multiply both sides by (x + y)/(2 xy) to obtain the equiv√ alent inequality xy < (x + y)/2, which is proved in Example 14. 25. The parity (oddness or evenness) of the sum of the numbers written on the board never changes, because j + k and |j − k| have the same parity (and at each step we reduce the sum by j + k but increase it by |j − k|). Therefore the integer at the end of the process must have the same parity as 1 + 2 + · · · + (2n) = n(2n + 1), which is odd because n is odd. 27. Without loss of generality we can assume that n is nonnegative, because the fourth power of an integer and the fourth power of its negative are the same. We divide an arbitrary positive integer n by 10, obtaining a quotient k and remainder l, whence n = 10k + l, and l is an integer between 0 and 9, inclusive. Then we compute n4 in each of these 10 cases. We get the following values, where X is some integer that is a multiple of 10, whose exact value we do not care about. (10k + 0)4 = 10,000k 4 = 10,000k 4 + 0, (10k + 1)4 = 10,000k 4 + X · k 3 + X · k 2 + X · k + 1, (10k + 2)4 = 10,000k 4 + X · k 3 + X · k 2 + X · k + 16, (10k + 3)4 = 10,000k 4 + X · k 3 + X · k 2 + X · k + 81, (10k + 4)4 = 10,000k 4 + X · k 3 + X · k 2 + X · k + 256, (10k + 5)4 = 10,000k 4 + X · k 3 + X · k 2 + X · k + 625, (10k + 6)4 = 10,000k 4 + X · k 3 + X · k 2 + X · k + 1296, (10k + 7)4 = 10,000k 4 + X · k 3 + X · k 2 + X · k + 2401, (10k + 8)4 = 10,000k 4 + X ·k 3 + X · k 2 + X · k + 4096, (10k + 9)4 = 10,000k 4 + X · k 3 + X · k 2 + X · k + 6561. Because each coefficient indicated by X is a multiple of 10, the corresponding term has no effect on the ones digit of the answer. Therefore the ones digits are 0, 1, 6, 1, 6, 5, 6, 1, 6, 1, respectively, so it is always a 0, 1, 5, or 6. 29. Because n3 > 100 for all n > 4, we need only note that n = 1, n = 2, n = 3, and n = 4 do not satisfy n2 + n3 = 100. 31. Because 54 = 625, both x and y must be less than 5. Then x 4 + y 4 ≤ 44 + 44√= 512 < 625. 33. If it is√not √ √ 3 3 3 true that a ≤ n, b ≤ n, or c ≤ n, then a > 3 n, √ √ of b > 3 n, and c > 3 n. Multiplying these inequalities √ positive numbers together we obtain abc < ( 3 n)3 = n, which implies the negation of our hypothesis that n = abc. 35. By finding a common denominator, we can assume that the given rational numbers are a/b and c/b, where b is a pos-

itive integer and a and c are integers√with a < c. In particular, (a + 1)/b ≤ c/b. Thus, x = (a + 21 √ 2)/b is between the two given rational numbers, because 0 < 2 < 2. Furthermore, √x is irrational, because if x were rational, then 2(bx − a) = 2 would be as well, in violation of Example 10 in Section 1.7. 37. a) Without loss of generality, we can assume that the x sequence is already sorted into nondecreasing order, because we can relabel the indices. There are only a finite number of possible orderings for the y sequence, so if we can show that we can increase the sum (or at least keep it the same) whenever we find yi and yj that are out of order (i.e., i < j but yi > yj ) by switching them, then we will have shown that the sum is largest when the y sequence is in nondecreasing order. Indeed, if we perform the swap, then we have added xi yj + xj yi to the sum and subtracted xi yi + xj yj . The net effect is to have added xi yj + xj yi − xi yi − xj yj = (xj − xi )(yi − yj ), which is nonnegative by our ordering assumptions. b) Similar to part (a) 39. a) 6 → 3 → 10 → 5 → 16 → 8 → 4 → 2 → 1 b) 7 → 22 → 11 → 34 → 17 → 52 → 26 → 13 → 40 → 20 → 10 → 5 → 16 → 8 → 4 → 2 → 1 c) 17 → 52 → 26 → 13 → 40 → 20 →10 → 5 → 16 → 8 → 4 → 2 → 1 d) 21 → 64 →32 → 16 → 8 → 4 → 2 → 1 41. Without loss of generality, assume that the upper left and upper right corners of the board are removed. Place three dominoes horizontally to fill the remaining portion of the first row, and fill each of the other seven rows with four horizontal dominoes. 43. Because there is an even number of squares in all, either there is an even number of squares in each row or there is an even number of squares in each column. In the former case, tile the board in the obvious way by placing the dominoes horizontally, and in the latter case, tile the board in the obvious way by placing the dominoes vertically. 45. We can rotate the board if necessary to make the removed squares be 1 and 16. Square 2 must be covered by a domino. If that domino is placed to cover squares 2 and 6, then the following domino placements are forced in succession: 5-9, 13-14, and 10-11, at which point there is no way to cover square 15. Otherwise, square 2 must be covered by a domino placed at 2-3. Then the following domino placements are forced: 4-8, 11-12, 6-7, 5-9, and 10-14, and again there is no way to cover square 15. 47. Remove the two black squares adjacent to a white corner, and remove two white squares other than that corner. Then no domino can cover that white corner. 49. a) (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

(5)

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-12

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

b) The picture shows tilings for the first four patterns. 1

3

2

4

To show that pattern 5 cannot tile the checkerboard, label the squares from 1 to 64, one row at a time from the top, from left to right in each row. Thus, square 1 is the upper left corner, and square 64 is the lower right. Suppose we did have a tiling. By symmetry and without loss of generality, we may suppose that the tile is positioned in the upper left corner, covering squares 1, 2, 10, and 11. This forces a tile to be adjacent to it on the right, covering squares 3, 4, 12, and 13. Continue in this manner and we are forced to have a tile covering squares 6, 7, 15, and 16. This makes it impossible to cover square 8. Thus, no tiling is possible.

Supplementary Exercises 1. a) q → p b) q ∧ p c) ¬q ∨ ¬p d) q ↔ p 3. a) The proposition cannot be false unless ¬p is false, so p is true. If p is true and q is true, then ¬q ∧ (p → q) is false, so the conditional statement is true. If p is true and q is false, then p → q is false, so ¬q ∧ (p → q) is false and the conditional statement is true. b) The proposition cannot be false unless q is false. If q is false and p is true, then (p ∨ q) ∧ ¬p is false, and the conditional statement is true. If q is false and p is false, then (p ∨ q) ∧ ¬p is false, and the conditional statement is true. 5. ¬q → ¬p; p → q; ¬p → ¬q 7. (p ∧ q ∧ r ∧ ¬s) ∨ (p ∧ q ∧ ¬r ∧ s) ∨ (p ∧ ¬q ∧ r ∧ s) ∨ (¬p ∧ q ∧ r ∧ s) 9. Translating these statements into symbols, using the obvious letters, we have ¬t → ¬g, ¬g → ¬q, r → q, and ¬t ∧ r. Assume the statements are consistent. The fourth statement tells us that ¬t must be true. Therefore by modus ponens with the first statement, we know that ¬g is true, hence (from the second statement), that ¬q is true. Also, the fourth statement tells us that r must be true, and so again modus ponens (third statement) makes q true. This is a contradiction: q ∧ ¬q. Thus the statements are inconsistent. 11. Reject-accept-rejectaccept, accept-accept-accept-accept, accept-accept-rejectaccept, reject-reject-reject-reject, reject-reject-accept-reject, and reject-accept-accept-accept 13. Aaron is a knave and Crystal is a knight; it cannot be determined what Bohan is. 15. Brenda 17. The premises cannot both be true, because

they are contradictory. Therefore it is (vacuously) true that whenever all the premises are true, the conclusion is also true, which by definition makes this a valid argument. Because the premises are not both true, we cannot conclude that the conclusion is true. 19. Use the same propositions as were given in Section 1.3 for a 9 × 9 Sudoku puzzle, with the variables indexed from 1 to 16, instead of from 1 to 9, and with a similar for for the change 4 thepropositions 4 4 × 4 blocks: 3r=0 3s=0 16 n=1 i=1 j =1 p(4r + i, 4s + j, n). 21. a) F b) T c) F d) T e) F f) T 23. Many answers are possible. One example is United States senators. 25. ∀x∃y∃z (y = z ∧ ∀w(P (w, x) ↔ (w = y ∨ w = z))) 27. a) ¬∃xP (x) b) ∃x(P (x) ∧ ∀y(P (y) → y = x)) c) ∃x1 ∃x2 (P (x1 ) ∧ P (x2 ) ∧ x1 = x2 ∧ ∀y (P (y) → (y = x1 ∨y = x2 ))) d) ∃x1 ∃ x2 ∃ x3 (P (x1 )∧P (x2 ) ∧P (x3 )∧x1 = = x3 ∧ x2 = x3 ∧ ∀y(P (y) → x2 ∧ x1 (y = x1 ∨ y = x2 ∨ y = x3 ))) 29. Suppose that ∃x(P (x) → Q(x)) is true. Then either Q(x0 ) is true for some x0 , in which case ∀xP (x) → ∃x Q(x) is true; or P (x0 ) is false for some x0 , in which case ∀xP (x) → ∃xQ(x) is true. Conversely, suppose that ∃x(P (x) → Q(x)) is false. That means that ∀x(P (x) ∧ ¬Q(x)) is true, which implies ∀xP (x) and ∀x(¬Q(x)). This latter proposition is equivalent to ¬∃xQ(x). Thus, ∀xP (x) → ∃xQ(x) is false. 31. No 33. ∀x ∀z ∃y T (x, y, z), where T (x, y, z) is the statement that student x has taken class y in department z, where the domains are the set of students in the class, the set of courses at this university, and the set of departments in the school of mathematical sciences 35. ∃!x∃!y T (x, y) and ∃x∀z((∃y∀w(T (z, w) ↔ w = y)) ↔ z = x), where T (x, y) means that student x has taken class y and the domain is all students in this class 37. P (a) → Q(a) and Q(a) → R(a) by universal instantiation; then ¬Q(a) by modus tollens and 39. We give a proof by contraposi¬P (a) by modus tollens √ tion and show that if x is rational, then√x is rational, assuming throughout that x √ ≥ 0. Suppose that x = p/q is rational, q = 0. Then x = ( x)2 = p 2 /q 2 is also rational (q 2 is again nonzero). 41. We can give a constructive proof by letting m = 10500 +1. Then m2 = (10500 +1)2 > (10500 )2 = 101000 . 43. 23 cannot be written as the sum of eight cubes. 45. 223 cannot be written as the sum of 36 fifth powers.

CHAPTER 2 Section 2.1 1. a) {−1,1} b) {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11} c) {0,1,4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81} d) ∅ 3. a) The first is a subset of the second, but the second is not a subset of the first. b) Neither is a subset of the other. c) The first is a subset of the second, but the second is not a subset of the first. 5. a) Yes b) No c) No 7. a) Yes b) No c) Yes d) No e) No f) No 9. a) False b) False c) False d) True e) False f) False g) True 11. a) True b) True c) False d) True e) True f) False

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-13

13. January May June July August

March

February April

September November

October

December

15. The dots in certain regions indicate that those regions are not empty.

A

B C U

17. Suppose that x ∈ A. Because A ⊆ B, this implies that x ∈ B. Because B ⊆ C, we see that x ∈ C. Because x ∈ A implies that x ∈ C, it follows that A ⊆ C. 19. a) 1 b) 1 c) 2 d) 3 21. a) {∅, {a}} b) {∅, {a}, {b}, {a, b}} c) {∅, {∅}, {{∅}}, {∅, {∅}}} 23. a) 8 b) 16 c) 2 25. For the “if” part, given A ⊆ B, we want to show that that P (A) ⊆ P (B), i.e., if C ⊆ A then C ⊆ B. But this follows directly from Exercise 17. For the “only if” part, given that P (A) ⊆ P (B), we want to show that A ⊆ B. Suppose a ∈ A. Then {a} ⊆ A, so {a} ∈ P (A). Since P (A) ⊆ P (B), it follows that {a} ∈ P (B), which means that {a} ⊆ B. But this implies a ∈ B, as desired. 27. a) {(a, y), (b, y), (c, y), (d, y), (a, z), (b, z), (c, z), (d, z)} b) {(y, a), (y, b), (y, c), (y, d), (z, a), (z, b), (z, c), (z, d)} 29. The set of triples (a, b, c), where a is an airline and b and c are cities. A useful subset of this set is the set of triples (a, b, c) for which a flies between b and c. 31. ∅ × A = {(x, y) | x ∈ ∅ and y ∈ A} = ∅ = {(x, y) | x ∈ A and y ∈ ∅} = A × ∅ 33. a) {(0, 0), (0, 1), (0, 3), (1, 0), (1, 1), (1, 3), (3, 0), (3, 1), (3, 3)} b) {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, a), (1, b), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, a), (2, b), (a, 1), (a, 2), (a, a), (a, b), (b, 1), (b, 2), (b, a), (b, b)} 35. mn 37. mn 39. The elements of A × B × C consist of 3-tuples (a, b, c), where a ∈ A, b ∈ B, and c ∈ C, whereas the elements of (A × B) × C look like ((a, b), c)—ordered pairs, the first coordinate of which is again an ordered pair. 41. a) The square of a real number is never −1. True b) There exists an integer whose square is 2. False c) The square of every integer is positive. False d) There is a real number equal to its own square. True 43. a) {−1, 0, 1} b) Z − {0, 1} c) ∅ 45. We must show that {{a}, {a, b}} = {{c}, {c, d}} if and only if a = c and b = d. The “if” part is immediate. So assume these two sets are equal. First, consider the case when a = b. Then {{a}, {a, b}} contains exactly two elements, one of which contains one element. Thus, {{c}, {c, d}} must have the same property, so c = d and {c} is the element containing exactly one element. Hence, {a} = {c}, which implies that a = c. Also, the two-element sets {a, b} and {c, d} must be equal. Because a = c and a = b, it follows that b = d.

Second, suppose that a = b. Then {{a}, {a, b}} = {{a}}, a set with one element. Hence, {{c}, {c, d}} has only one element, which can happen only when c = d, and the set is {{c}}. It then follows that a = c and b = d. 47. Let S = {a1 , a2 , . . . , an }. Represent each subset of S with a bit string of length n, where the ith bit is 1 if and only if ai ∈ S. To generate all subsets of S, list all 2n bit strings of length n (for instance, in increasing order), and write down the corresponding subsets.

Section 2.2 1. a) The set of students who live within one mile of school and walk to classes b) The set of students who live within one mile of school or walk to classes (or do both) c) The set of students who live within one mile of school but do not walk to classes d) The set of students who walk to classes but live more than one mile away from school 3. a) {0,1,2,3,4,5,6} b) {3} c) {1, 2, 4,5} d) {0, 6} 5. A = {x | ¬(x ∈ A)} = {x |¬(¬x ∈ A)} = {x | x ∈ A} = A 7. a) A ∪ U = {x | x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ U } = {x | x ∈ A ∨ T} = {x | T} = U b) A ∩ ∅ = {x | x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ ∅} = {x | x ∈ A ∧ F} = {x | F} = ∅ 9. a) A ∪ A = {x | x ∈ A ∨ x ∈A} = U b) A ∩ A = {x | x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ A} = ∅ 11. a) A ∪ B = {x | x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B} = {x | x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ A} = B ∪ A b) A ∩ B = {x | x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B} = {x | x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ A} = B ∩ A 13. Suppose x ∈ A ∩ (A ∪ B). Then x ∈ A and x ∈ A ∪ B by the definition of intersection. Because x ∈ A, we have proved that the left-hand side is a subset of the righthand side. Conversely, let x ∈ A. Then by the definition of union, x ∈ A ∪ B as well. Therefore x ∈ A ∩ (A ∪ B) by the definition of intersection, so the right-hand side is a subset of the left-hand side. 15. a) x ∈ A ∪ B ≡ x ∈A ∪ B ≡ ¬(x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ≡ ¬(x ∈ A) ∧ ¬(x ∈ B) ≡ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ≡ x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B ≡ x ∈ A ∩ B b)

A

B

A∪B

A∪B

A

B

A∩B

1 1 0 0

1 0 1 0

1 1 1 0

0 0 0 1

0 0 1 1

0 1 0 1

0 0 0 1

17. a) x ∈ A ∩ B ∩ C ≡ x ∈ A ∩ B ∩ C ≡ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C ≡ x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C ≡ x ∈ A ∪ B ∪ C b)

A

B

C

A∩B ∩C

A∩B ∩C

1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

A B

C

A∪B ∪C

0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1

0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1

0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-14

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

19. a) Both sides equal {x | x ∈ A∧x ∈ B}. b) A = A∩U = A ∩ (B ∪ B) = (A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ B) 21. x ∈ A ∪ (B ∪ C) ≡ (x ∈ A) ∨ (x ∈ (B ∪ C)) ≡ (x ∈ A) ∨ (x ∈ B ∨ x ∈ C) ≡ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∨ (x ∈ C) ≡ x ∈ (A ∪ B) ∪ C 23. x ∈ A ∪ (B ∩ C) ≡ (x ∈ A) ∨ (x ∈ (B ∩ C)) ≡ (x ∈ A) ∨ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∈ C) ≡ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B) ∧ (x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ C) ≡ x ∈ (A ∪ B) ∩ (A ∪ C) 25. a) {4,6} b) {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10} c) {4, 5, 6, 8, 10} d) {0,2,4, 5,6,7,8,9,10} 27. a) The double-shaded portion is the desired set. B

A

C

b) The desired set is the entire shaded portion. A

B

Section 2.3

C

c) The desired set is the entire shaded portion. A

b) 11 1110 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ∧ 01 1100 1000 0000 0100 0101 0000 = 01 1100 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000, representing {b, c, d} c) (11 1110 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ∨ 00 0110 0110 0001 1000 0110 0110) ∧ (01 1100 1000 0000 0100 0101 0000 ∨ 00 1010 0010 0000 1000 0010 0111) = 11 1110 0110 0001 1000 0110 0110 ∧ 01 1110 1010 0000 1100 0111 0111 = 01 1110 0010 0000 1000 0110 0110, representing {b, c, d, e, i, o, t, u, x, y} d) 11 1110 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ∨ 01 1100 1000 0000 0100 0101 0000 ∨ 00 1010 0010 0000 1000 0010 0111 ∨ 00 0110 0110 0001 1000 0110 0110 = 11 1110 1110 0001 1100 0111 0111, representing {a,b,c,d,e,g,h,i,n,o,p,t,u,v,x,y,z} 59. a) {1, 2, 3, {1, 2, 3}} b) {∅} c) {∅, {∅}} d) {∅, {∅}, {∅, {∅}}} 61. a) {3 · a, 3 · b, 1 · c, 4 · d} b) {2 · a, 2 · b} c) {1 · a, 1 · c} d) {1 · b, 4 · d} e) {5 · a, 5 · b, 1 · c, 4 · d} 63. F = {0.4 Alice, 0.1 Brian, 0.6 Fred, 0.9 Oscar, 0.5 Rita}, R = {0.6 Alice, 0.2 Brian, 0.8 Fred, 0.1 Oscar, 0.3 Rita} 65. {0.4 Alice, 0.8 Brian, 0.2 Fred, 0.1 Oscar, 0.5 Rita}

B

C

29. a) B ⊆ A b) A ⊆ B c) A ∩ B = ∅ d) Nothing, because this is always true e) A = B 31. A ⊆ B ≡ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ≡ ∀x(x ∈ B → x ∈ A) ≡ ∀x(x ∈ B → x ∈ A) ≡ B ⊆ A 33. The set of students who are computer science majors but not mathematics majors or who are mathematics majors but not computer science majors 35. An element is in (A ∪ B) − (A ∩ B) if it is in the union of A and B but not in the intersection of A and B, which means that it is in either A or B but not in both A and B. This is exactly what it means for an element to belong to A ⊕ B. 37. a) A ⊕ A = (A − A) ∪ (A − A) = ∅ ∪ ∅ = ∅ b) A ⊕ ∅ = (A − ∅) ∪ (∅ − A) = A ∪ ∅ = A c) A ⊕ U = (A − U ) ∪ (U − A) = ∅ ∪ A = A d) A ⊕ A = (A − A) ∪ (A − A) = A ∪ A = U 39. B = ∅ 41. Yes 43. Yes 45. If A∪B were finite, then it would have n elements for some natural number n. But A already has more than n elements, because it is infinite, and A∪B has all the elements that A has, so A ∪ B has more than n elements. This contradiction shows that A ∪ B must be infinite. 47. a) {1, 2, 3, . . . , n} b) {1} 49. a) An b) {0, 1} 51. a) Z, {−1, 0, 1} b) Z − {0}, ∅ c) R, [−1, 1] d) [1, ∞), ∅ 53. a) {1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10} b) {2, 4, 5, 6, 7} c) {1, 10} 55. The bit in the ith position of the bit string of the difference of two sets is 1 if the ith bit of the first string is 1 and the ith bit of the second string is 0, and is 0 otherwise. 57. a) 11 1110 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ∨ 01 1100 1000 0000 0100 0101 0000 = 11 1110 1000 0000 0100 0101 0000, representing {a, b, c, d, e, g, p, t, v}

1. a) f (0) is not defined. b) f (x) is not defined for x < 0. c) f (x) is not well-defined because there are two distinct values assigned to each x. 3. a) Not a function b) A function c) Not a function 5. a) Domain the set of bit strings; range the set of integers b) Domain the set of bit strings; range the set of even nonnegative integers c) Domain the set of bit strings; range the set of nonnegative integers not exceeding 7 d) Domain the set of positive integers; range the set of squares of positive integers = {1, 4, 9, 16, . . .} 7. a) Domain Z+ × Z+ ; range Z+ b) Domain Z+ ; range {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9} c) Domain the set of bit strings; range N d) Domain the set of bit strings; range N 9. a) 1 b) 0 c) 0 d) −1 e) 3 f) −1 g) 2 h) 1 11. Only the function in part (a) 13. Only the functions in parts (a) and (d) 15. a) Onto b) Not onto c) Onto d) Not onto e) Onto 17. a) Depends on whether teachers share offices b) Oneto-one assuming only one teacher per bus c) Most likely not one-to-one, especially if salary is set by a collective bargaining agreement d) One-to-one 19. Answers will vary. a) Set of offices at the school; probably not onto b) Set of buses going on the trip; onto, assuming every bus gets a teacher chaperone c) Set of real numbers; not onto d) Set of strings of nine digits with hyphens after third and fifth digits; not onto 21. a) The function f (x) with f (x) = 3x + 1 when x ≥ 0 and f (x) = −3x + 2 when x < 0 b) f (x) = |x| + 1 c) The function f (x) with f (x) = 2x + 1 when x ≥ 0 and f (x) = −2x when x < 0 d) f (x) = x 2 + 1 23. a) Yes b) No c) Yes d) No 25. Suppose that f is strictly decreasing. This means that f (x) > f (y) whenever x < y. To show that g is strictly increasing, suppose that x < y. Then g(x) = 1/f (x) < 1/f (y) = g(y). Conversely, suppose that g is strictly increasing. This means that g(x) < g(y) whenever x < y. To show that f is strictly decreasing, suppose that x < y. Then f (x) = 1/g(x) > 1/g(y) = f (y). 27. a) Let f be a given strictly decreasing function from R to itself. If

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-15

a < b, then f (a) > f (b); if a > b, then f (a) < f (b). Thus if a = b, then f (a) = f (b). b) Answers will vary; for example, f (x) = 0 for x < 0 and f (x) = âˆ’x for x â‰Ľ 0. 29. The function is not one-to-one, so it is not invertible. On the restricted domain, the function is the identity function on the nonnegative real numbers, f (x) = x, so it is its own inverse. 31. a) f (S) = {0, 1, 3} b) f (S) = {0, 1, 3, 5, 8} c) f (S) = {0, 8, 16, 40} d) f (S) = {1, 12, 33, 65} 33. a) Let x and y be distinct elements of A. Because g is oneto-one, g(x) and g(y) are distinct elements of B. Because f is one-to-one, f (g(x)) = (f â—Ś g)(x) and f (g(y)) = (f â—Ś g)(y) are distinct elements of C. Hence, f â—Ś g is one-to-one. b) Let y âˆˆ C. Because f is onto, y = f (b) for some b âˆˆ B. Now because g is onto, b = g(x) for some x âˆˆ A. Hence, y = f (b) = f (g(x)) = (f â—Śg)(x). It follows that f â—Śg is onto. 35. No. For example, suppose that A = {a}, B = {b, c}, and C = {d}. Let g(a) = b, f (b) = d, and f (c) = d. Then f and f â—Ś g are onto, but g is not. 37. (f + g)(x) = x 2 + x + 3, (fg)(x) = x 3 + 2x 2 + x + 2 39. f is one-to-one because f (x1 ) = f (x2 ) â†’ ax1 + b = ax2 + b â†’ ax1 = ax2 â†’ x1 = x2 . f is onto because f ((y âˆ’ b)/a) = y.f âˆ’1 (y) = (y âˆ’ b)/a. 41. a) A = B = R, S = { x | x > 0}, T = { x | x < 0}, f (x) = x 2 b) It suffices to show that f (S)âˆŠf (T ) âŠ† f (SâˆŠT ). Let y âˆˆ B be an element of f (S) âˆŠ f (T ). Then y âˆˆ f (S), so y = f (x1 ) for some x1 âˆˆ S. Similarly, y = f (x2 ) for some x2 âˆˆ T . Because f is one-to-one, it follows that x1 = x2 . Therefore x1 âˆˆ S âˆŠ T , so y âˆˆ f (S âˆŠ T ). 43. a) {x | 0 â‰¤ x < 1} b) {x | âˆ’1 â‰¤ x < 2} c) âˆ… 45. f âˆ’1 (S) = {x âˆˆ A | f (x) âˆˆ S} = {x âˆˆ A | f (x) âˆˆ S} = f âˆ’1 (S) 47. Let x = x + , where is a real number with 0 â‰¤ < 1. If < 21 , then x âˆ’ 1 < x âˆ’ 21 < x, so x âˆ’ 21 = x and this is the integer closest to x. If > 21 , then x < x âˆ’ 21 < x + 1, so x âˆ’ 21 = x + 1 and this is the integer closest to x. If = 21 , then x âˆ’ 21 = x, which is the smaller of the two integers that surround x and are the same distance from x. 49. Write the real number x as x + , where is a real number with 0 â‰¤ < 1. Because = x âˆ’ x, it follows that 0 â‰¤ âˆ’x < 1. The first two inequalities, x âˆ’1 < x and x â‰¤ x, follow directly. For the other two inequalities, write x = x âˆ’ , where 0 â‰¤ < 1. Then 0 â‰¤ x âˆ’ x < 1, and the desired inequality follows. 51. a) If x < n, because x â‰¤ x, it follows that x < n. Suppose that x â‰Ľ n. By the definition of the floor function, it follows that x â‰Ľ n. This means that if x < n, then x < n. b) If n < x, then because x â‰¤ x, it follows that n â‰¤ x. Suppose that n â‰Ľ x. By the definition of the ceiling function, it follows that x â‰¤ n. This means that if n < x, then n < x. 53. If n is even, then n = 2k for some integer k. Thus, n/2 = k = k = n/2. If n is odd, then n = 2k + 1 for some integer k. Thus, n/2 = k + 21 = k = (n âˆ’ 1)/2. 55. Assume that x â‰Ľ 0. The left-hand side is âˆ’x and the right-hand side is âˆ’x. If x is an integer, then both sides equal âˆ’x. Otherwise, let x = n + , where n is a natural number and is a real number with 0 â‰¤ < 1. Then âˆ’x = âˆ’n âˆ’ = âˆ’n and âˆ’x = âˆ’n + = âˆ’n also. When x < 0, the equation also holds because it can

be obtained by substituting âˆ’x for x. 57. b âˆ’ a âˆ’ 1 59. a) 1 b) 3 c) 126 d) 3600 61. a) 100 b) 256 c) 1030 d) 30,200 63.

4 3 2 1 â€“1

â€“2

0

1

2

3

4

â€“1 â€“2

65.

3 2 1 â€“2

â€“1

0

1

2

3

â€“1 â€“2 â€“3 3

67. a)

â€“4

b)

2

1

1

â€“2

â€“1

2

â€“1

â€“2

4

â€“2

â€“3

â€“3

1 3 â€“1

6

â€“1

f)

4

5 4 3

3 2

2 1

1 â€“1

1

â€“1 â€“2 â€“3

â€“3

â€“2

2

9 12

â€“2

e)

1

4 3 2 1

d)

2

â€“12 â€“9 â€“6 â€“3

â€“1

â€“2

3

c)

3

2

â€“1

1

2

â€“2

â€“2 â€“3 â€“4

â€“1

â€“1 â€“2 â€“3 â€“4

1

2

g) See part (a). 69. f âˆ’1 (y) = (y âˆ’ 1)1/3 71. a) fAâˆŠB (x) = 1 â†” x âˆˆ A âˆŠ B â†” x âˆˆ A and x âˆˆ B â†” fA (x) = 1 and fB (x) = 1 â†” fA (x)fB (x) = 1 b) fAâˆŞB (x) = 1 â†” x âˆˆ A âˆŞ B â†” x âˆˆ A or x âˆˆ B â†” fA (x) = 1 or fB (x) = 1 â†” fA (x) + fB (x) âˆ’ fA (x)fB (x) = 1 c) fA (x) = 1 â†” x âˆˆ A â†” x âˆˆ A â†” fA (x) = 0 â†” 1âˆ’fA (x) = 1 d) fAâŠ•B (x) = 1 â†” x âˆˆ A âŠ• B â†” (x âˆˆ A and x âˆˆ B) or (x âˆˆ A and x âˆˆ B) â†” fA (x) + fB (x) âˆ’ 2fA (x)fB (x) = 1 73. a) True; because x is already an integer, x = x. b) False; x = 21 is a counterexample. c) True; if x or y is an integer, then by property 4b in Table 1, the difference is 0. If

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-16

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

neither x nor y is an integer, then x = n + and y = m + δ, where n and m are integers and and δ are positive real numbers less than 1. Then m + n < x + y < m + n + 2, so x + y is either m + n + 1 or m + n + 2. Therefore, the given expression is either (n + 1) + (m + 1) − (m + n + 1) = 1 or (n + 1) + (m + 1) − (m + n + 2) = 0, as desired. d) False; x = 41 and y = 3 is a counterexample. e) False; x = 21 is a counterexample. 75. a) If x is a positive integer, then the two sides are equal. So suppose that x = n2 + m + , where n2 is the largest perfect square less√ than x, √ m is a nonnegative √ integer, and 0 < ≤ 1. Then both x and x = n2 + m are between n and n + 1, so both sides equal n. b) If x is a positive integer, then the two sides are equal. So suppose that x = n2 − m − , where n2 is the smallest perfect square greater than x, m is a nonnegative√ integer, √ and is a √ real number with 0 < ≤ 1. Then both x and x = n2 − m are between n − 1 and n. Therefore, both sides of the equation equal n. 77. a) Domain is Z; codomain is R; domain of definition is the set of nonzero integers; the set of values for which f is undefined is {0}; not a total function. b) Domain is Z; codomain is Z; domain of definition is Z; set of values for which f is undefined is ∅; total function. c) Domain is Z × Z; codomain is Q; domain of definition is Z × (Z − {0}); set of values for which f is undefined is Z × {0}; not a total function. d) Domain is Z × Z; codomain is Z; domain of definition is Z × Z; set of values for which f is undefined is ∅; total function. e) Domain is Z × Z; codomain is Z; domain of definitions is {(m, n) | m > n}; set of values for which f is undefined is {(m, n) | m ≤ n}; not a total function. 79. a) By definition, to say that S has cardinality m is to say that S has exactly m distinct elements. Therefore we can assign the first object to 1, the second to 2, and so on. This provides the one-to-one correspondence. b) By part (a), there is a bijection f from S to {1, 2, . . . , m} and a bijection g from T to {1, 2, . . . , m}. Then the composition g −1 ◦ f is the desired bijection from S to T .

Section 2.4 1. a) 3 b) −1 c) 787 d) 2639 3. a) a0 = 2, a1 = 3, a2 = 5, a3 = 9 b) a0 = 1, a1 = 4, a2 = 27, a3 = 256 c) a0 = 0, a1 = 0, a2 = 1, a3 = 1 d) a0 = 0, a1 = 1, a2 = 2, a3 = 3 5. a) 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29 b) 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4 c) 1, 1, 3, 3, 5, 5, 7, 7, 9, 9 d) −1, −2, −2, 8, 88, 656, 4912, 40064, 362368, 3627776 e) 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 192, 384, 768, 1536 f) 2, 4, 6, 10, 16, 26, 42, 68, 110, 178 g) 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4 h) 3, 3, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 5, 4, 3 7. Each term could be twice the previous term; the nth term could be obtained from the previous term by adding n − 1; the terms could be the positive integers that are not multiples of 3; there are infinitely many other possibilities. 9. a) 2, 12, 72, 432, 2592 b) 2, 4, 16, 256, 65,536 c) 1, 2, 5, 11, 26 d) 1, 1, 6, 27, 204 e) 1, 2, 0, 1, 3 11. a) 6, 17, 49, 143, 421 b) 49 = 5 · 17 − 6 · 6, 143 = 5 · 49 − 6 · 17, 421 = 5 · 143 − 6 · 49 c) 5an−1 − 6an−2 =5(2n−1 + 5 ·

3n−1 ) − 6(2n−2 + 5 · 3n−2 ) = 2n−2 (10 − 6) + 3n−2 (75 − 30) = 2n−2 · 4 + 3n−2 · 9 · 5 = 2n + 3n · 5 = an 13. a) Yes b) No c) No d) Yes e) Yes f) Yes g) No h) No 15. a) an−1 + 2an−2 + 2n − 9 = −(n − 1) + 2 + 2 [−(n − 2) + 2] + 2n − 9 = −n +2 = an b) an−1 + 2an−2 + 2n − 9 = 5(−1)n−1 − (n − 1) + 2 + 2[5(−1)n−2 − (n − 2) + 2] + 2n − 9 = 5(−1)n − 2 (−1 + 2) − n + 2 = an c) an−1 + 2an−2 + 2n−9 = 3(−1)n−1 +2n−1 − (n−1) + 2 + 2[3(−1)n−2 + 2n−2 − (n − 2) + 2] + 2n − 9 = 3(−1)n−2 (−1 + 2) + 2n−2 (2 + 2) − n + 2 = an d) an−1 + 2an−2 + 2n − 9 = 7 · 2n−1 − (n − 1) + 2 + 2[7 · 2n−2 − (n − 2) + 2] + 2n − 9 = 2n−2 (7 · 2 + 2 · 7) − n + 2 = an 17. a) an = 2 · 3n b) an = 2n + 3 c) an = 1 + n(n + 1)/2 d) an = n2 + 4n + 4 e) an = 1 f) an = (3n+1 − 1)/2 g) an = 5n! h) an = 2n n! 19. a) an = 3an−1 b) 5,904,900 = n + an−1 , a0 = 0 b) a12 = 78 21. a) an c) an = n(n + 1)/2 23. B(k) = [1 + (0.07/12)]B(k − 1) − 100, with B(0) = 5000 25. a) One 1 and one 0, followed by two 1s and two 0s, followed by three 1s and three 0s, and so on; 1, 1, 1 b) The positive integers are listed in increasing order with each even positive integer listed twice; 9, 10, 10. c) The terms in odd-numbered locations are the successive powers of 2; the terms in even-numbered locations are all 0; 32, 0, 64. d) an = 3 · 2n−1 ; 384, 768, 1536 e) an = 15 − 7(n − 1) = 22 − 7n; −34, −41, −48 f) an = (n2 + n + 4)/2; 57, 68, 80 g) an = 2n3 ; 1024, 1458, 2000 h) an = n! + 1; 362881, 3628801, 39916801 27. Among the integers 1, 2, . . . , an , where an is the nth positive integer not a perfect square, the nonsquares are a1 ,a2 , . . . ,an and the squares are 12 ,22 , . . . ,k 2 , where k is the integer with k 2 < n + k < (k + 1)2 . Consequently, an = n + k, where k 2 < an < (k + 1)2 . To find k, first note that k 2 < n + k < (k + 1)2 , so k 2 +1 ≤ n+k ≤ (k +1)2 −1. Hence, (k− 21 )2 + 43 = k 2 −k+1 ≤ n ≤ k 2 +k = (k+ 21 )2 − 41 . √ √ It follows that k − 21 < √n < k + 21 , so k = { n} and an = n + k = n + { n}. 29. a) 20 b) 11 c) 30 d) 511 31. a) 1533 b) 510 n c) 4923 d) 9842 33. a) 21 b) 78 c) 18 d) 18 35. j =1 (aj − aj −1 ) = an − a0 37. a) n2 b) n(n + 1)/2 39. 15150 41. n(n+1)(2n+1) + 3 n(n+1) 2 + 1), where n = √m − 1 + (n + 1)(m − (n + 1) 2 43. a) 0 b) 1680 c) 1 d) 1024 45. 34

Section 2.5 1. a) Countably infinite, −1, −2, −3, −4, . . . b) Countably infinite, 0, 2, −2, 4, −4, . . . c) Countably infinite, 99, 98, 97, . . . d) Uncountable e) Finite f) Countably infinite, 0, 7, −7, 14, −14, . . . 3. a) Countable: match n with the string of n 1s. b) Countable. To find a correspondence, follow the path in Example 4, but omit fractions in the top three rows (as well as continuing to omit fractions not in lowest terms). c) Uncountable d) Uncountable 5. Suppose m new guests arrive at the fully occupied hotel. Move the guest in Room n to Room m + n for n = 1, 2, 3, . . .; then the new guests can occupy rooms 1 to m. 7. For n = 1, 2, 3, . . ., put

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-17

the guest currently in Room 2n into Room n, and the guest currently in Room 2n âˆ’ 1 into Room n of the new building. 9. Move the guess currently Room i to Room 2i + 1 for i = 1, 2, 3, . . .. Put the j th guest from the kth bus into Room 2k (2j + 1). 11. a) A = [1, 2] (closed interval of real numbers from 1 to 2), B = [3, 4] b) A = [1, 2] âˆŞ Z+ , B = [3, 4]âˆŞZ+ c) A = [1, 3], B = [2, 4] 13. Suppose that A is countable. Then either A has cardinality n for some nonnegative integer n, in which case there is a one-to-one function from A to a subset of Z+ (the range is the first n positive integers), or there exists a one-to-one correspondence f from A to Z+ ; in either case we have satisfied Definition 2. Conversely, suppose that |A| â‰¤ |Z+ |. By definition, this means that there is a one-to-one function from A to Z+ , so A has the same cardinality as a subset of Z+ (namely the range of that function). By Exercise 16 we conclude that A is countable. 15. Assume that B is countable. Then the elements of B can be listed as b1 , b2 , b3 , . . . . Because A is a subset of B, taking the subsequence of {bn } that contains the terms that are in A gives a listing of the elements of A. Because A is uncountable, this is impossible. 17. Assume that Aâˆ’B is countable. Then, because A = (A âˆ’ B) âˆŞ (A âˆŠ B), the elements of A can be listed in a sequence by alternating elements of A âˆ’ B and elements of A âˆŠ B. This contradicts the uncountability of A. 19. We are given bijections f from A to B and g from C to D. Then the function from A Ă— C to B Ă— D that sends (a, c) to (f (a), g(c)) is a bijection. 21. By the definition of |A| â‰¤ |B|, there is a one-to-one function f : A â†’ B. Similarly, there is a one-to-one function g : B â†’ C. By Exercise 33 in Section 2.3, the composition g â—Ś f : A â†’ C is one-to-one. Therefore by definition |A| â‰¤ |C|. 23. Using the Axiom of Choice from set theory, choose distinct elements a1 , a2 , a3 , â€Śof A one at a time (this is possible because A is infinite). The resulting set {a1 , a2 , a3 , . . .} is the desired infinite subset of A. 25. The set of finite strings of characters over a finite alphabet is countably infinite, because we can list these strings in alphabetical order by length. Therefore the infinite set S can be identified with an infinite subset of this countable set, which by Exercise 16 is also countably infinite. 27. Suppose that A1 , A2 , A3 , . . . are countable sets. Because Ai is countable, we can list its elements in a sequence as ai1 , ai2 , ai3 , . . . . The elements of the set ni=1 Ai can be listed by listing all terms aij with i + j = 2, then all terms aij with i + j = 3, then all terms aij with i + j = 4, and so on. 29. There are a finite number of bit strings of length m, namely, 2m . The set of all bit, strings is the union of the sets of bit strings of length m for m = 0, 1, 2, . . . . Because the union of a countable number of countable sets is countable (see Exercise 27), there are a countable number of bit strings. 31. It is clear from the formula that the range of values the function takes on for a fixed value of m + n, say m + n = x, is (x âˆ’ 2)(x âˆ’ 1)/2 + 1 through (x âˆ’ 2)(x âˆ’ 1)/2 + (x âˆ’ 1), because m can assume the values 1, 2, 3, . . . , (x âˆ’ 1) under these conditions, and the first term in the formula is a fixed positive integer when m + n is fixed. To show that this function is one-to-one and onto, we merely need to show that the range of values for

x + 1 picks up precisely where the range of values for x left off, i.e., that f (x âˆ’ 1, 1) + 1 = f (1, x). We have 2 âˆ’ 1) f (x âˆ’ 1, 1) + 1 = (xâˆ’2)(x + (x âˆ’ 1) + 1 = x âˆ’2x + 2 = 2 (x âˆ’ 1)x +1 = f (1, x). 33. By the SchrĂśder-Bernstein theo2 rem, it suffices to find one-to-one functions f : (0, 1) â†’ [0, 1] and g : [0, 1] â†’ (0, 1). Let f (x) = x and g(x) = (x + 1)/3. 35. Each element A of the power set of the set of positive integers (i.e., A âŠ† Z+ ) can be represented uniquely by the bit string a1 a2 a3 . . ., where ai = 1 if i âˆˆ A and ai = 0 if i âˆˆ / A. Assume there were a one-to-one correspondence f : Z+ â†’ P (Z+ ). Form a new bit string s = s1 s2 s3 . . . by setting si to be 1 minus the ith bit of f (i). Then because s differs in the i bit from f (i), s is not in the range of f , a contradiction. 37. For any finite alphabet there are a finite number of strings of length n, whenever n is a positive integer. It follows by the result of Exercise 27 that there are only a countable number of strings from any given finite alphabet. Because the set of all computer programs in a particular language is a subset of the set of all strings of a finite alphabet, which is a countable set by the result from Exercise 16, it is itself a countable set. 39. Exercise 37 shows that there are only a countable number of computer programs. Consequently, there are only a countable number of computable functions. Because, as Exercise 38 shows, there are an uncountable number of functions, not all functions are computable.

Section 2.6 âŽĄ âŽ¤ 1

1. a) 3 Ă— 4 b) âŽŁ4âŽŚ c) 2 0 4 6 d) 1 3 âŽĄ âŽ¤ âŽĄ âŽ¤ e) 1 2 1 3. a) 1 11 b) 2 âˆ’2 âˆ’3 âŽ˘1 0 1âŽĽ âŽŁ1 0 2âŽŚ 2 18 âŽ˘ âŽĽ âŽŁ1 4 3âŽŚ 9 âˆ’4 4 3 6 7 âŽĄ âŽ¤ c) âˆ’4 15 âˆ’4 5. 9/5 âˆ’6/5 1 âŽ˘âˆ’3 10 âˆ’1/5 4/5 2 âˆ’3 âŽĽ âŽ˘ âŽĽ âŽŁ0 2 âˆ’8 6 âŽŚ 1 âˆ’8 18 âˆ’13

7. 0+A = 0 + aij = aij + 0 = 0+A 9. A+(B + C) =

aij + (bij + cij ) = (aij + bij ) + cij = (A + B) + C 11. The number of rows of A equals the number of columns of B, and the number of columns of A equals the number of rows of B. 13. A(BC) = a b c a b c = = iq qr rl iq qr rl r q q r a b c = = (AB)C r q iq qr rl r q aiq bqr crl 1 n 15. An = 17. a) Let A = [aij ] and 0 1 B = [bij ]. Then A + B = [aij + bij ]. We have (A + B)t = [aj i + bj i ] = [aj i ] + [bj i ] = At + Bt . b) Using the same notation as in part (a), we have Bt At =

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-18

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

bqi aj q = = (AB)t , because the q aj q bqi (i, j )th entry is the (j, i)th 19. The result fol entry of AB. a b d âˆ’b ad âˆ’ bc 0 lows because = = c d âˆ’c a 0 ad âˆ’ bc d âˆ’b a b . 21. An (Aâˆ’1 )n = (ad âˆ’ bc)I2 = âˆ’c a c d A(A Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ(A(AAâˆ’1 )Aâˆ’1 ) Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ Aâˆ’1 )Aâˆ’1 by the associative law. Because AAâˆ’1 = I, working from the inside shows that An (Aâˆ’1 )n = I. Similarly (Aâˆ’1 )n An = I. Therefore (An )âˆ’1 = (Aâˆ’1 )n . 23. The (i, j )th entry of A + At is aij + aj i , which equals aj i + aij , the (j, i)th entry of A + At , so by definition A + At is symmetric. 25. x1 = 1, x2 = âˆ’1, x3 = âˆ’2 q

âŽĄ 27. a) 1 âŽŁ1 1 âŽĄ 29. a) 1 âŽŁ1 1

1 1 0 0 1 0

âŽ¤ 1 1âŽŚ 1 âŽ¤ 0 0âŽŚ 1

âŽĄ b) 0 âŽŁ1 0 âŽĄ b) 1 âŽŁ1 1

0 0 0 0 0 1

âŽ¤ 1 0âŽŚ 1 âŽ¤ 0 1âŽŚ 0

âŽĄ c) 1 âŽŁ1 1 âŽĄ c) 1 âŽŁ1 1

1 1 0 0 1 1

âŽ¤ 1 1âŽŚ 1 âŽ¤ 0 1âŽŚ 1

31. a) A âˆ¨ B = [aij âˆ¨ bij ] = [bij âˆ¨ aij ] = B âˆ¨ A b) A âˆ§ B = 33. a) A âˆ¨ (B âˆ§ C) = [aij âˆ§ bij ] = [bij âˆ§ aij ] = B âˆ§ A [aij ] âˆ¨ [bij âˆ§ cij ] = [aij âˆ¨ (bij âˆ§ cij )] = [(aij âˆ¨ bij ) âˆ§ (aij âˆ¨ cij )] = [aij âˆ¨ bij ] âˆ§ [aij âˆ¨ cij ] = (A âˆ¨ B) âˆ§ (A âˆ¨ C) b) A âˆ§ (B âˆ¨ C) = [aij ] âˆ§ [bij âˆ¨ cij ] = [aij âˆ§ (bij âˆ¨ cij )] = [(aij âˆ§ bij ) âˆ¨ (aij âˆ§ cij )] = [aij âˆ§ bij ] âˆ¨ [aij âˆ§ âˆ§ C) 35. A (B C) = cij ] = (A âˆ§ B) âˆ¨ (A = = q aiq âˆ§ r bqr âˆ§ crl q r aiq âˆ§ bqr âˆ§ crl âˆ§ crl = r q aiq âˆ§ bqr âˆ§crl = r q aiq âˆ§ bqr (A B) C

Supplementary Exercises 1. a) A b) A âˆŠ B c) A âˆ’ B d) A âˆŠ B e) A âŠ• B 3. Yes 5. A âˆ’ (A âˆ’ B) = A âˆ’ (A âˆŠ B) = A âˆŠ (A âˆŠ B) =A âˆŠ (A âˆŞ B) = (A âˆŠ A) âˆŞ (A âˆŠ B) = âˆ… âˆŞ (A âˆŠ B) = A âˆŠ B 7. Let A = {1}, B = âˆ…, C = {1}. Then (A âˆ’ B) âˆ’ C = âˆ…, but A âˆ’ (B âˆ’ C) = {1}. 9. No. For example, let A = B = {a, b}, C = âˆ…, and D = {a}. Then (A âˆ’ B) âˆ’ (C âˆ’ D) = âˆ… âˆ’ âˆ… = âˆ…, but (A âˆ’ C) âˆ’ (B âˆ’ D) = {a, b} âˆ’ {b} = {a}. 11. a) |âˆ…| â‰¤ |A âˆŠ B| â‰¤ |A| â‰¤ |A âˆŞ B| â‰¤ |U | b) |âˆ…| â‰¤ |A âˆ’ B| â‰¤ |A âŠ• B| â‰¤ |A âˆŞ B| â‰¤ |A| + |B| 13. a) Yes, no b) Yes, no c) f has inverse with f âˆ’1 (a) = 3, f âˆ’1 (b) = 4, f âˆ’1 (c) = 2, f âˆ’1 (d) = 1; g has no inverse. 15. If f is oneto-one, then f provides a bijection between S and f (S), so they have the same cardinality. If f is not one-to-one, then there exist elements x and y in S such that f (x) = f (y). Let S = {x, y}. Then |S| = 2 but |f (S)| = 1. 17. Let x âˆˆ A. Then Sf ({x}) = {f (y) | y âˆˆ {x}} = {f (x)}. By

the same reasoning, Sg ({x}) = {g(x)}. Because Sf = Sg , we can conclude that {f (x)} = {g(x)}, and so necessarily f (x) = g(x). 19. The equation is true if and only if the sum of the fractional parts of x and y is less than 1. 21. The equation is true if and only if either both x and y are integers, or x is not an integer but the sum of the fractional parts of x and y is less than or equal to 1. 23. If x is an integer, then x + m âˆ’ x = x + m âˆ’ x = m. Otherwise, write x in terms of its integer and fractional parts: x = n + , where n = x and 0 < < 1. In this case x + m âˆ’ x =n + + m âˆ’ n âˆ’ = n + m âˆ’ n âˆ’ 1 = m âˆ’ 1. 25. Write n = 2k + 1 for some integer k. Then n2 = 4k 2 + 4k +1, so n2 /4 = k 2 +k + 41 . Therefore, n2 /4 = k 2 +k +1. But (n2 +3)/4 = (4k 2 +4k +1+3)/4 = k 2 +k +1. 27. Let x = n + (r/m) + , where n is an integer, r is a nonnegative integer less than m, and is a real number with 0 â‰¤ < 1/m. The left-hand side is nm + r + m = nm + r. On the righthand side, the terms x through x + (m + r âˆ’ 1)/m are all just n and the terms from x + (m âˆ’ r)/m on are all n + 1. Therefore, the right-hand side is (mâˆ’r)n+r(n+1) = nm+r, as well. 29. 101 31. a1 = 1; a2n+1 = n Âˇ a2n for all n > 0; and a2n = n + a2nâˆ’1 for all n > 0. The next four terms are 5346, 5353, 37471, and 37479. 33. If each f âˆ’1 (j ) is countable, then S = f âˆ’1 (1) âˆŞ f âˆ’1 (2) âˆŞ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ is the countable union of countable sets and is therefore countable by Exercise 27 in Section 2.5. 35. Because there is a one-to-one correspondence between R and the open interval (0, 1) (given by f (x) = 2 arctan(x)/Ď€ ), it suffices to shows that |(0, 1) Ă— (0, 1)| = |(0, 1)|. By the SchrĂśderBernstein theorem it suffices to find injective functions f : (0, 1) â†’ (0, 1) Ă— (0, 1) and g : (0, 1) Ă— (0, 1) â†’ (0, 1). Let f (x) = (x, 21 ). For g we follow the hint. Suppose (x, y) âˆˆ (0, 1) Ă— (0, 1), and represent x and y with their decimal expansions x = 0.x1 x2 x3 . . . and y = 0.y1 y2 y3 . . ., never choosing the expansion of any number that ends in an infinite string of 9s. Let g(x, y) be the decimal expansion obtained by interweaving these two 0.x1 y1x2 y2 x3 y3 . . .. strings, namely 1 0 0 1 37. A4n = , A4n+1 = , A4n+2 = 0 1 âˆ’1 0 âˆ’1 0 0 âˆ’1 , A4n+3 = , for n â‰Ľ 0 39. Suppose 0 âˆ’1 1 0 a b 0 1 that A = . Let B = . Because AB = BA, c d 0 0 0 0 it follows that c = 0 and a = d. Let B = . Because 1 0 a 0 AB = BA, it follows that b = 0. Hence, A = = aI. 0 a

41. a) Let A 0 = bij . Then bij = (ai1 âˆ§ 0) âˆ¨ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆ¨ (aip âˆ§ 0)

A

= 0. Hence, 0 = 0. Similarly 0 A = 0. b) A âˆ¨ 0 = aij âˆ¨ 0 = aij = A. Hence A âˆ¨ 0 = A. Similarly 0 âˆ¨ A = A. c) A âˆ§ 0 = aij âˆ§ 0 = [0] = 0. Hence A âˆ§ 0 = 0. Similarly 0 âˆ§ A = 0.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-19

CHAPTER 3 Section 3.1 1. max := 1, i := 2, max := 8, i := 3, max := 12, i := 4, i := 5, i := 6, i := 7, max := 14, i := 8, i := 9, i := 10, i := 11 3. procedure AddUp(a1 , . . . , an: integers) sum : = a1 for i : = 2 to n sum := sum + ai return sum 5. procedure duplicates(a1 , a2 , . . . , an: integers in nondecreasing order) k := 0 {this counts the duplicates} j := 2 while j ≤ n if aj = aj −1 then k := k + 1 ck := aj while j ≤ n and aj = ck j := j + 1 j := j + 1 {c1 , c2 , . . . , ck is the desired list} 7. procedure last even location(a1 ,a2 , . . . ,an: integers) k := 0 for i := 1 to n if ai is even then k := i return k {k = 0 if there are no evens} 9. procedure palindrome check(a1 a2 . . . an: string) answer := true for i := 1 to n/2 if ai = an+1−i then answer := false return answer 11. procedure interchange(x, y: real numbers) z := x x := y y := z The minimum number of assignments needed is three. 13. Linear search: i := 1, i := 2, i := 3, i := 4, i := 5, i := 6, i := 7, location := 7; binary search: i := 1, j := 8, m := 4, i := 5, m := 6, i := 7, m := 7, j := 7, location := 7 15. procedure insert(x, a1 , a2 , . . . , an : integers) {the list is in order: a1 ≤ a2 ≤ · · · ≤ an } an+1 := x + 1 i := 1 while x > ai i := i + 1 for j := 0 to n − i an−j +1 := an−j ai := x {x has been inserted into correct position}

17. procedure first largest(a1 , . . . , an: integers) max := a1 location := 1 for i := 2 to n if max < ai then max := ai location := i return location 19. procedure mean-median-max-min(a, b, c: integers) mean := (a + b + c)/ 3 {the six different orderings of a, b, c with respect to ≥ will be handled separately} if a ≥ b then if b ≥ c then median := b; max := a; min := c .. . (The rest of the algorithm is similar.) 21. procedure first-three(a1 , a2 , . . . , an: integers) if a1 > a2 then interchange a1 and a2 if a2 > a3 then interchange a2 and a3 if a1 > a2 then interchange a1 and a2 23. procedure onto(f : function from A to B where A = {a1 , . . . , an }, B = {b1 , . . . , bm }, a1 , . . . , an , b1 , . . . , bm are integers) for i := 1 to m hit(bi ) := 0 count := 0 for j := 1 to n if hit(f (aj )) = 0 then hit(f (aj )) := 1 count := count + 1 if count = m then return true else return false 25. procedure ones(a: bit string, a = a1 a2 . . . an ) count:= 0 for i := 1 to n if ai := 1 then count := count + 1 return count 27. procedure ternary search(s: integer, a1 ,a2 , . . . , an: increasing integers) i := 1 j := n while i < j − 1 l := (i + j )/3 u := 2(i + j )/3 if x > au then i := u + 1 else if x > al then i := l + 1 j := u else j := l if x = ai then location := i else if x = aj then location := j

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-20

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

else location := 0 return location {0 if not found} 29. procedure find a mode(a1 , a2 , . . . , an : nondecreasing integers) modecount := 0 i := 1 while i ≤ n value := ai count := 1 while i ≤ n and ai = value count := count + 1 i := i + 1 if count > modecount then modecount := count mode := value return mode 31. procedure find duplicate(a1 , a2 , . . . , an: integers) location := 0 i := 2 while i ≤ n and location = 0 j := 1 while j < i and location = 0 if ai = aj then location := i else j := j + 1 i := i + 1 return location {location is the subscript of the first value that repeats a previous value in the sequence} 33. procedure find decrease(a1 , a2 , . . . , an: positive integers) location := 0 i := 2 while i ≤ n and location = 0 if ai < ai−1 then location := i else i := i + 1 return location {location is the subscript of the first value less than the immediately preceding one} 35. At the end of the first pass: 1, 3, 5, 4, 7; at the end of the second pass: 1, 3, 4, 5, 7; at the end of the third pass: 1, 3, 4, 5, 7; at the end of the fourth pass: 1, 3, 4, 5, 7 37. procedure better bubblesort(a1 , . . . , an: integers) i : = 1; done : = false while i < n and done = false done : = true for j : = 1 to n − i if aj > aj +1 then interchange aj and aj +1 done : = false i :=i+1 {a1 , . . . , an is in increasing order} 39.At the end of the first, second, and third passes: 1, 3, 5, 7, 4; at the end of the fourth pass: 1, 3, 4, 5, 7 41. a) 1, 5, 4, 3, 2; 1, 2, 4, 3, 5; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 b) 1, 4, 3, 2, 5; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 c) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 43. We carry

out the linear search algorithm given as Algorithm 2 in this section, except that we replace x = ai by x < ai , and we replace the else clause with else location := n + 1. 45. 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · + n = (n2 + n − 2)/2 47. Find the location for the 2 in the list 3 (one comparison), and insert it in front of the 3, so the list now reads 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6. Find the location for the 4 (compare it to the 2 and then the 3), and insert it, leaving 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6. Find the location for the 5 (compare it to the 3 and then the 4), and insert it, leaving 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6. Find the location for the 1 (compare it to the 3 and then the 2 and then the 2 again), and insert it, leaving 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Find the location for the 6 (compare it to the 3 and then the 4 and then the 5), and insert it, giving the final answer 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. 49. procedure binary insertion sort(a1 , a2 , . . . , an: real numbers with n ≥ 2) for j := 2 to n {binary search for insertion location i} left := 1 right := j − 1 while left < right middle := (left + right)/2 if aj > amiddle then left := middle + 1 else right := middle if aj < aleft then i := left else i := left + 1 {insert aj in location i by moving ai through aj −1 toward back of list} m := aj for k := 0 to j − i − 1 aj −k := aj −k−1 ai := m {a1 , a2 , . . . , an are sorted} 51. The variation from Exercise 50 53. a) Two quarters, one penny b) Two quarters, one dime, one nickel, four pennies c) A three quarters, one penny d) Two quarters, one dime 55. Greedy algorithm uses fewest coins in parts (a), (c), and (d). a) Two quarters, one penny b) Two quarters, one dime, nine pennies c) Three quarters, one penny d) Two quarters, one dime 57. The 9:00–9:45 talk, the 9:50–10:15 talk, the 10:15–10:45 talk, the 11:00–11:15 talk 59. a) Order the talks by starting time. Number the lecture halls 1, 2, 3, and so on. For each talk, assign it to lowest numbered lecture hall that is currently available. b) If this algorithm uses n lecture halls, then at the point the nth hall was first assigned, it had to be used (otherwise a lower-numbered hall would have been assigned), which means that n talks were going on simultaneously (this talk just assigned and the n − 1 talks currently in halls 1 through n − 1). 61. Here we assume that the men are the suitors and the women the suitees. procedure stable(M1 , M2 , . . . , Ms , W1 , W2 , . . . , Ws: preference lists) for i := 1 to s mark man i as rejected for i := 1 to s set man i’s rejection list to be empty for j := 1 to s

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-21

set woman j â€™s proposal list to be empty while rejected men remain for i := 1 to s if man i is marked rejected then add i to the proposal list for the woman j who ranks highest on his preference list but does not appear on his rejection list, and mark i as not rejected for j := 1 to s if woman j â€™s proposal list is nonempty then remove from j â€™s proposal list all men i except the man i0 who ranks highest on her preference list, and for each such man i mark him as rejected and add j to his rejection list for j := 1 to s match j with the one man on j â€™s proposal list {This matching is stable.} 63. If the assignment is not stable, then there is a man m and a woman w such that m prefers w to the woman w with whom he is matched, and w prefers m to the man with whom she is matched. But m must have proposed to w before he proposed to w , because he prefers the former. Because m did not end up matched with w, she must have rejected him. Women reject a suitor only when they get a better proposal, and they eventually get matched with a pending suitor, so the woman with whom w is matched must be better in her eyes than m, contradicting our original assumption. Therefore the marriage is stable. 65. Run the two programs on their inputs concurrently and report which one halts.

max(k1 , k2 ) it follows that |f (x)| â‰¤ C1 |g(x)| â‰¤ C1 C2 |h(x)|. This shows that f (x) is O(h(x)). 19. 2n+1 is O(2n ); âˆš 22n is not. 21. 1000 log n, n, n log n, n2 /1000000, 2n , 3n , 2n! 23. The algorithm that uses n log n operations 25. a) O(n3 ) b) O(n5 ) c) O(n3 Âˇ n!) 27. a) O(n2 log n) n b) O(n2 (log n)2 ) c) O(n2 ) 29. a) Neither (x 2 ) nor (x 2 ) b) (x 2 ) and (x 2 ) c) Neither (x 2 ) nor (x 2 ) d) (x 2 ), but not (x 2 ) e) (x 2 ), but not (x 2 ) f) (x 2 ) and (x 2 ) 31. If f (x) is (g(x)), then there exist constants C1 and C2 with C1 |g(x)| â‰¤ |f (x)| â‰¤ C2 |g(x)|. It follows that |f (x)| â‰¤ C2 |g(x)| and |g(x)| â‰¤ (1/C1 )|f (x)| for x > k. Thus, f (x) is O(g(x)) and g(x) is O(f (x)). Conversely, suppose that f (x) is O(g(x)) and g(x) is O(f (x)). Then there are constants C1 , C2 , k1 , and k2 such that |f (x)| â‰¤ C1 |g(x)| for x > k1 and |g(x)| â‰¤ C2 |f (x)| for x > k2 . We can assume that C2 > 0 (we can always make C2 larger). Then we have (1/C2 )|g(x)| â‰¤ |f (x)| â‰¤ C1 |g(x)| for x > max(k1 , k2 ). Hence, f (x) is (g(x)). 33. If f (x) is (g(x)), then f (x) is both O(g(x)) and (g(x)). Hence, there are positive constants C1 , k1 , C2 , and k2 such that |f (x)| â‰¤ C2 |g(x)| for all x > k2 and |f (x)| â‰Ľ C1 |g(x)| for all x > k1 . It follows that C1 |g(x)| â‰¤ |f (x)| â‰¤ C2 |g(x)| whenever x > k, where k = max(k1 ,k2 ). Conversely, if there are positive constants C1 , C2 , and k such that C1 |g(x)| â‰¤ |f (x)| â‰¤ C2 |g(x)| for x > k, then taking k1 = k2 = k shows that f (x) is both O(g(x)) and (g(x)). 35. y

C2 g(x) f (x)

Section 3.2 1. The choices of C and k are not unique. a) C = 1, k = 10 b) C = 4, k = 7c) Nod) C = 5, k = 1e) C = 1, k = 0 f) C = 1, k = 2 3. x 4 +9x 3 +4x +7 â‰¤ 4x 4 for all x > 9; witnesses C = 4, k = 9 5. (x 2 + 1)/(x + 1) = x âˆ’ 1 + 2/(x + 1) < x for all x > 1; witnesses C = 1, k = 1 7. The choices of C and k are not unique. a) n = 3, C = 3, k = 1 b) n = 3, C = 4, k = 1 c) n = 1, C = 2, k = 1 d) n = 0, C = 2, k = 1 9. x 2 + 4x + 17 â‰¤ 3x 3 for all x > 17, so x 2 + 4x + 17 is O(x 3 ), with witnesses C = 3, k = 17. However, if x 3 were O(x 2 + 4x + 17), then x 3 â‰¤ C(x 2 + 4x + 17) â‰¤ 3Cx 2 for some C, for all sufficiently large x, which implies that x â‰¤ 3C for all sufficiently large x, which is impossible. Hence, x 3 is not O(x 2 + 4x + 17). 11. 3x 4 + 1 â‰¤ 4x 4 = 8(x 4 /2) for all x > 1, so 3x 4 + 1 is O(x 4 /2), with witnesses C = 8, k = 1. Also x 4 /2 â‰¤ 3x 4 +1 for all x > 0, so x 4 /2 is O(3x 4 +1), with witnesses C = 1, k = 0. 13. Because 2n â‰¤ 3n for all n > 0, it follows that 2n is O(3n ), with witnesses C = 1, k = 0. However, if 3n were O(2n ), then for some C, 3n â‰¤ C Âˇ 2n for all sufficiently large n. This says that C â‰Ľ (3/2)n for all sufficiently large n, which is impossible. Hence, 3n is not O(2n ). 15. All functions for which there exist real numbers k and C with |f (x)| â‰¤ C for x > k. These are the functions f (x) that are bounded for all sufficiently large x. 17. There are constants C1 , C2 , k1 , and k2 such that |f (x)| â‰¤ C1 |g(x)| for all x > k1 and |g(x)| â‰¤ C2 |h(x)| for all x > k2 . Hence, for x >

C1 g(x)

k

x

37. If f (x) is (1), then |f (x)| is bounded between positive constants C1 and C2 . In other words, f (x) cannot grow larger than a fixed bound or smaller than the negative of this bound and must not get closer to 0 than some fixed bound. 39. Because f (x) is O(g(x)), there are constants C and k such that |f (x)| â‰¤ C|g(x)| for x > k. Hence, |f n (x)| â‰¤ C n |g n (x)| for x > k, so f n (x) is O(g n (x)) by taking the constant to be C n . 41. Because f (x) and g(x) are increasing and unbounded, we can assume f (x) â‰Ľ 1 and g(x) â‰Ľ 1 for sufficiently large x. There are constants C and k with f (x) â‰¤ Cg(x) for x > k. This implies that log f (x) â‰¤ log C + log g(x) < 2 log g(x) for sufficiently large x. Hence, log f (x) is O(log g(x)). 43. By definition there are positive constraints C1 , C1 , C2 , C2 , k1 , k1 , k2 , and k2 such that f1 (x) â‰Ľ C1 |g(x)| for all x > k1 , f1 (x) â‰¤ C1 |g(x)| for all x > k1 , f2 (x) â‰Ľ C2 |g(x)| for all x > k2 , and f2 (x) â‰¤ C2 |g(x)| for all x > k2 . Adding the first and third inequalities shows that f1 (x) + f2 (x) â‰Ľ (C1 + C2 )|g(x)| for all x > k where

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-22

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

k = max(k1 , k2 ). Adding the second and fourth inequalities shows that f1 (x) + f2 (x) â‰¤ (C1 + C2 )|g(x)| for all x > k where k = max(k1 , k2 ). Hence, f1 (x) + f2 (x) is (g(x)). This is no longer true if f1 and f2 can assume negative values. 45. This is false. Let f1 = x 2 + 2x, f2 (x) = x 2 + x, and g(x) = x 2 . Then f1 (x) and f2 (x) are both O(g(x)), but (f1 âˆ’ f2 )(x) is not. 47. Take f (n) to be the function with f (n) = n if n is an odd positive integer and f (n) = 1 if n is an even positive integer and g(n) to be the function with g(n) = 1 if n is an odd positive integer and g(n) = n if n is an even positive integer. 49. There are positive constants C1 , C2 , C1 , C2 , k1 , k1 , k2 , and k2 such that |f1 (x)| â‰Ľ C1 |g1 (x)| for all x > k1 , |f1 (x)| â‰¤ C1 |g1 (x)| for all x â‰Ľ k1 , |f2 (x)| > C2 |g2 (x)| for all x > k2 , and |f2 (x)| â‰¤ C2 |g2 (x)| for all x > k2 . Because f2 and g2 are never zero, the last two inequalities can be rewritten as |1/f2 (x)| â‰¤ (1/C2 )|1/g2 (x)| for all x > k2 and |1/f2 (x)| â‰Ľ (1/C2 )|1/g2 (x)| for all x > k2 . Multiplying the first and rewritten fourth inequalities shows that |f1 (x)/f2 (x)| â‰Ľ (C1 /C2 )|g1 (x)/g2 (x)| for all x > max(k1 , k2 ), and multiplying the second and rewritten third inequalities gives |f1 (x)/f2 (x)| â‰¤ (C1 /C2 )|g1 (x)/g2 (x)| for all x > max(k1 , k2 ). It follows that f1 /f2 is big-Theta of g1 /g2 . 51. There exist positive constants C1 , C2 , k1 , k2 , k1 , k2 such that |f (x, y)| â‰¤ C1 |g(x, y)| for all x > k1 and y > k2 and |f (x, y)| â‰Ľ C2 |g(x, y)| for all x > k1 and y > k2 . 53. (x 2 + xy + x log y)3 < (3x 2 y 3 ) = 27x 6 y 3 for x > 1 and y > 1, because x 2 < x 2 y, xy < x 2 y, and x log y < x 2 y. Hence, (x 2 + xy + x log y)3 is O(x 6 y 3 ). 55. For all positive real numbers x and y, xy â‰¤ xy. Hence, xy is O(xy) from the definition, taking C = 1 and k1 = k2 = 0. 57. Clearly nd < nc for all n â‰Ľ 2; therefore nd is O(nc ). The ratio nd /nc = ndâˆ’c is unbounded so there is no constant C such that nd â‰¤ Cnc for large n. 59. If f and g are positive-valued functions such that limnâ†’âˆž f (x)/g(x) = C < âˆž, then f (x) < (C +1)g(x) for large enough x, so f (n) is O(g(n)). If that limit is âˆž, then clearly f (n) is not O(g(n)). Here repeated applications of Lâ€™HĂ´pitalâ€™s rule shows that limxâ†’âˆž x d /bx = 0 and limxâ†’âˆž bx /x d = âˆž. 61. a) limxâ†’âˆž x 2 /x 3 = x limxâ†’âˆž 1/x = 0 b) limxâ†’âˆž x log = limxâ†’âˆž logx x = x2 limxâ†’âˆž limxâ†’âˆž rule) d) 63.

1 x2 x ln 2 = 0 (using Lâ€™HĂ´pitalâ€™s rule) c) lim xâ†’âˆž 2x = 2x 2 = 0 (using Lâ€™HĂ´pitalâ€™s 2x Âˇln 2 = lim xâ†’âˆž 2x Âˇ(ln 2)2 x 2 +x+1 limxâ†’âˆž x 2 = limxâ†’âˆž 1 + x1 + x12 = 1 = 0

y x2

x

lim x log x = 0 âŹ x2

x log x x log x x2 x

65. No. Take f (x) = 1/x 2 and g(x) = 1/x. 67. a) Because limxâ†’âˆž f (x)/g(x) = 0, |f (x)|/|g(x)| < 1 for sufficiently large x. Hence, |f (x)| < |g(x)| for x > k for some constant k. Therefore, f (x) is O(g(x)). b) Let f (x) = g(x) = x. Then f (x) is O(g(x)), but f (x) is not o(g(x)) because f (x)/g(x) = 1. 69. Because f2 (x) is o(g(x)), from Exercise 67(a) it follows that f2 (x) is O(g(x)). By Corollary 1, we have f1 (x) + f2 (x) is O(g(x)). 71. We can easily show that (n âˆ’ i)(i + 1) â‰Ľ n for i = 0,1, . . . , n âˆ’ 1. Hence, (n!)2 = (n Âˇ 1)((n âˆ’ 1) Âˇ 2) Âˇ ((n âˆ’ 2) Âˇ 3) Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ (2 Âˇ (n âˆ’ 1)) Âˇ (1 Âˇ n) â‰Ľ nn . Therefore, 2 log n! â‰Ľ n log n. 73. Compute that log 5! â‰ˆ 6.9 and (5 log 5)/4 â‰ˆ 2.9, so the inequality holds for n = 5. Assume n â‰Ľ 6. Because n! is the product of all the integers from n down to 1, we have n! > n(n âˆ’ 1)(n âˆ’ 2) Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ n/2 (because at least the term 2 is missing). Note that there are more than n/2 terms in this product, and each term is at least as big as n/2. Therefore the product is greater than (n/2)(n/2) . Taking the log of both sides of the inequality, we have log n! > n/2 log n2 = n2 log n2 = n2 (log n âˆ’ 1) > (n log n)/4, because n > 4 implies log n âˆ’ 1 > (log n)/2. 75. All are not asymptotic.

Section 3.3 1. O(1) 3. O(n2 ) 5. 2n âˆ’ 1 7. Linear 9. O(n) 11. a) procedure disjointpair(S1 , S2 , . . . , Sn : subsets of {1, 2, . . . , n}) answer := false for i := 1 to n for j := i + 1 to n disjoint := true for k := 1 to n if k âˆˆ Si and k âˆˆ Sj then disjoint := false if disjoint then answer := true return answer b) O(n3 ) 13. a) power := 1, y := 1; i := 1, power := 2, y := 3; i := 2, power := 4, y := 15 9 8 b) 2n multiplications and n additions 15. a) 210 â‰ˆ103 Ă— 10 b) 109 c) 3.96 Ă— 107 d) 3.16 Ă— 104 e) 29 f) 12 âˆš 60Âˇ1012 12 6 2 60Âˇ10 60Âˇ10 17. a) 2 b) 2 c) 2 â‰ˆ 2 Ă— 102331768 d) 60,000,000 e) 7,745,966 f) 45 g) 6 19. a) 36 years b) 13 days c) 19 minutes 21. a) Less than 1 millisecond more b) 100 milliseconds more c) 2n + 1 milliseconds more d) 3n2 + 3n + 1 milliseconds more e) Twice as much time f) 22n+1 times as many milliseconds g) n + 1 times as many milliseconds 23. The average number of comparisons is (3n+ 4)/2. 25. O(log n) 27. O(n) 29. O(n2 ) 31. O(n) 33. O(n) 35. O(log n) comparisons; O(n2 ) swaps 37. O(n2 2n ) 39. a) doubles b) increases by 1 41. Use Algorithm 1, where A and B are now n Ă— n upper triangular matrices, by replacing m by n in line 1, and

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-23

having q iterate only from i to j , rather than from 1 to k. 43. n(n + 1)(n + 2)/6 45. A((BC)D)

Supplementary Exercises 1. a) procedure last max(a1 , . . . , an: integers) max := a1 last := 1 i := 2 while i ≤ n if ai ≥ max then max := ai last := i i := i + 1 return last b) 2n − 1 = O(n) comparisons 3. a) procedure pair zeros(b1 b2 . . . bn : bit string, n ≥ 2) x := b1 y := b2 k := 2 while k < n and (x = 0 or y = 0) k := k + 1 x := y y := bk if x = 0 and y = 0 then print “YES” else print “NO” b) O(n) 5. a) and b) procedure smallest and largest(a1 , a2 , . . . , an: integers) min := a1 max := a1 for i := 2 to n if ai < min then min := ai if ai > max then max := ai {min is the smallest integer among the input, and max is the largest} c) 2n − 2 7. Before any comparisons are done, there is a possibility that each element could be the maximum and a possibility that it could be the minimum. This means that there are 2n different possibilities, and 2n − 2 of them have to be eliminated through comparisons of elements, because we need to find the unique maximum and the unique minimum. We classify comparisons of two elements as “virgin” or “nonvirgin,” depending on whether or not both elements being compared have been in any previous comparison. A virgin comparison eliminates the possibility that the larger one is the minimum and that the smaller one is the maximum; thus each virgin comparison eliminates two possibilities, but it clearly cannot do more. A nonvirgin comparison must be between two elements that are still in the running to be the maximum or two elements that are still in the running to be the minimum, and at least one of these elements must not be in the running for

the other category. For example, we might be comparing x and y, where all we know is that x has been eliminated as the minimum. If we find that x > y in this case, then only one possibility has been ruled out—we now know that y is not the maximum. Thus in the worst case, a nonvirgin comparison eliminates only one possibility. (The cases of other nonvirgin comparisons are similar.) Now there are at most n/2 comparisons of elements that have not been compared before, each removing two possibilities; they remove 2n/2 possibilities altogether. Therefore we need 2n − 2 − 2n/2 more comparisons that, as we have argued, can remove only one possibility each, in order to find the answers in the worst case, because 2n − 2 possibilities have to be eliminated. This gives us a total of 2n − 2 − 2n/2 + n/2 comparisons in all. But 2n − 2 − 2n/2 + n/2 = 2n − 2 − n/2 = 2n − 2 + −n/2 =2n − n/2 − 2 = 3n/2 − 2, as desired. 9. The following algorithm has worst-case complexity O(n4 ). procedure equal sums(a1 , a2 , . . . , an ) for i := 1 to n for j := i + 1 to n {since we want i < j } for k := 1 to n for l := k + 1 to n {since we want k < l} if ai + aj = ak + al and (i, j ) = (k, l) then output these pairs 11. At end of first pass: 3, 1, 4, 5, 2, 6; at end of second pass: 1, 3, 2, 4, 5, 6; at end of third pass: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; fourth pass finds nothing to exchange and algorithm terminates 13. There are possibly as many as n passes through the list, and each pass uses O(n) comparisons. Thus there are O(n2 ) comparisons in all. 15. Because log n < n, we have (n log n + n2 )3 ≤ (n2 + n2 )3 ≤ (2n2 )3 = 8n6 for all n > 0. This proves that (n log n + n2 )3 is O(n6 ), with witnesses C = 8 and k = 0. 17. O(x 2 2x ) 19. Note that n! n n−1 3 2 1 n 1 n 21. All of these 2n = 2 · 2 · · · 2 · 2 · 2 > 2 ·1·1 · · · 1· 2 = 4 . 107 functions are of the same order. 23. 2 25. (log n)2 , √ log2 n 2 , n(log n)1001 , n1.0001 , 1.0001n , nn 27. For example, f (n) = n2n/2+1 and g(n) = n2n/2 29. a) procedure brute(a1 , a2 , . . . , an : integers) for i := 1 to n − 1 for j := i + 1 to n for k := 1 to n if ai + aj = ak then return true else return false b) O(n3 ) 31. For m1 : w1 and w2 ; for m2 : w1 and w3 ; for m3 : w2 and w3 ; for w1 : m1 and m2 ; for w2 : m1 and m3 ; for w3 : m2 and m3 33. A matching in which each woman is assigned her valid partner ranking highest on her preference list is female optimal; a matching in which each man is assigned his valid partner ranking lowest on his preference list is male pessimal. 35. a) Modify the preamble to Exercise 60 in Section 3.1 so that there are s men m1 , m2 , . . . , ms and t women w1 , w2 , . . . , wt . A matching will contain min(s, t) marriages. The definition of “stable marriage” is the same, with the understanding that each person prefers any mate to being unmatched. b) Create |s − t| fictitious people (men or women,

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-24

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

whichever is in shorter supply) so that the number of men and the number of women become the same, and put these fictitious people at the bottom of everyone’s preference lists. c) This follows immediately from Exercise 63 in Section 3.1. 37. 5; 15 39. The first situation in Exercise 37 41. a) For each subset S of {1, 2, . . . , n}, compute j ∈S wj . Keep track of the subset giving the largest such sum that is less than or equal to W , and return that subset as the output of the algorithm. b) The food pack and the portable stove 43. a) The makespan is always at least as large as the load on the processor assigned to do the lengthiest job, which must be at least maxj =1,2,...,n tj . Therefore the minimum makespan satisfies this inequality. b) The total amount of time the processors need to spend working on the jobs (the total load) is nj=1 tj . Therefore the average load per processor is p1 nj=1 tj . The maximum load cannot be any smaller than the average, so the minimum makespan is always at least this large. 45. Processor 1: jobs 1, 4; processor 2: job 2; processor 3: jobs 3, 5

integer s such that a = b + sm, so a − b = sm. Then a k − bk = (a − b)(a k−1 + a k−2 b + · · · + abk−2 + bk−1 ), k ≥ 2, is also a multiple of m. It follows that a k ≡ bk (mod m). 43. To prove closure, note that a ·m b = (a · b) mod m, which by definition is an element of Zm . Multiplication is associative because (a ·m b) ·m c and a ·m (b ·m c) both equal (a · b · c) mod m and multiplication of integers is associative. Similarly, multiplication in Zm is commutative because multiplication in Z is commutative, and 1 is the multiplicative identity for Zm because 1 is the multiplicative identity for Z. 45. 0+5 0 = 0, 0+5 1 = 1, 0+5 2 = 2, 0+5 3 = 3, 0+5 4 = 4; 1+5 1 = 2, 1+5 2 = 3, 1+5 3 = 4, 1+5 4 = 0; 2+5 2 = 4, 2+5 3 = 0, 2+5 4 = 1; 3+5 3 = 1, 3+5 4 = 2; 4+4 4 = 3 and 0·5 0 = 0, 0·5 1 = 0, 0·5 2 = 0, 0·5 3 = 0, 0·5 4 = 0; 1·5 1 = 1, 1·5 2 = 2, 1·5 3 = 3, 1·5 4 = 4; 2·5 2 = 4, 2·5 3 = 1, 2·5 4 = 3; 3·5 3 = 4, 3·5 4 = 2; 4·5 4 = 1 47. f is onto but not one-to-one (unless d = 1); g is neither.

Section 4.2

CHAPTER 4 Section 4.1 1. a) Yes b) No c) Yes d) No 3. Suppose that a | b. Then there exists an integer k such that ka = b. Because a(ck) = bc it follows that a | bc. 5. If a | b and b | a, there are integers c and d such that b = ac and a = bd. Hence, a = acd. Because a = 0 it follows that cd = 1. Thus either c = d = 1 or c = d = −1. Hence, either a = b or a = −b. 7. Because ac | bc there is an integer k such that ack = bc. Hence, ak = b, so a | b. 9. a) 2, 5 b) −11, 10 c) 34, 7 d) 77, 0 e) 0, 0 f) 0, 3 g) −1, 2 h) 4, 0 11. a) 7:00 b) 8:00 c) 10:00 13. a) 10 b) 8 c) 0 d) 9 e) 6 f) 11 15. If a mod m = b mod m, then a and b have the same remainder when divided by m. Hence, a = q1 m + r and b = q2 m + r, where 0 ≤ r < m. It follows that a − b = (q1 − q2 )m, so m | (a − b). It follows that a ≡ b (mod m). 17. There is some b with (b − 1)k < n ≤ bk. Hence, (b − 1)k ≤ n − 1 < bk. Divide by k to obtain b − 1 < n/k ≤ b and b − 1 ≤ (n − 1)/k < b. Hence, n/k = b and (n − 1)/k = b − 1. 19. x mod m if x mod m ≤ m/2 and (x mod m) − m if x mod m > m/2 21. a) 1 b) 2 c) 3 d) 9 23. a) 1, 109 b) 40, 89 c) −31, 222 d) −21, 38259 25. a) −15 b) −7 c) 140 27. −1, −26, −51, −76, 24, 49, 74, 99 29. a) No b) No c) Yes d) No 31. a) 13 a) 6 33. a) 9 b) 4 c) 25 d) 0 35. Let m = tn. Because a ≡ b (mod m) there exists an integer s such that a = b + sm. Hence, a = b + (st)n, so a ≡ b (mod n). 37. a) Let m = c = 2, a = 0, and b = 1. Then 0 = ac ≡ bc = 2 (mod 2), but 0 = a ≡ b = 1 (mod 2). b) Let m = 5, a = b = 3, c = 1, and d = 6. Then 3 ≡ 3 (mod 5) and 1 ≡ 6 (mod 5), but 31 = 3 ≡ 4 ≡ 729 = 36 (mod 5). 39. By Exercise 38 the sum of two squares must be either 0 + 0 = 0, 0 + 1 = 1, or 1 + 1 = 2, modulo 4, never 3, and therefore not of the form 4k + 3. 41. Because a ≡ b (mod m), there exists an

1. a) 1110 0111 b) 1 0001 1011 0100 c) 1 0111 11010110 1100 3. a) 31 b) 513 c) 341 d) 26,896 5. a) 1 0111 1010 b) 11 1000 0100 c) 1 0001 0011 d) 101 0000 1111 7. a) 1000 0000 1110 b) 1 0011 0101 1010 1011 c) 10101011 1011 1010 d) 1101 1110 1111 1010 11001110 1101 9. 1010 1011 1100 1101 1110 1111 11. (B7B)16 13. Adding up to three leading 0s if necessary, write the binary expansion as (. . . b23 b22 b21 b20 b13 b12 b11 b10 b03 b02 b01 b00 )2 . The value of this numeral is b00 + 2b01 + 4b02 + 8b03 + 24 b10 + 25 b11 + 26 b12 + 27 b13 + 28 b20 + 29 b21 + 210 b22 + 211 b23 + · · · , which we can rewrite as b00 + 2b01 + 4b02 + 8b03 + (b10 + 2b11 + 4b12 + 8b13 ) · 24 + (b20 + 2b21 + 4b22 + 8b23 ) · 28 + · · · . Now (bi3 bi2 bi1 bi0 )2 translates into the hexadecimal digit hi . So our number is h0 + h1 · 24 + h2 · 28 + · · · = h0 + h1 · 16 + h2 · 162 + · · · , which is the hexadecimal expansion (. . . h1 h1 h0 )16 . 15 Adding up to two leading 0s if necessary, write the binary expansion as (. . . b22 b21 b20 b12 b11 b10 b02 b01 b00 )2 . The value of this numeral is b00 + 2b01 + 4b02 + 23 b10 + 24 b11 + 25 b12 + 26 b20 + 27 b21 + 28 b22 + · · · , which we can rewrite as b00 + 2b01 + 4b02 +(b10 +2b11 +4b12 )·23 +(b20 +2b21 +4b22 )·26 +· · · . Now (bi2 bi1 bi0 )2 translates into the octal digit hi . So our number is h0 + h1 · 23 + h2 · 26 + · · · = h0 + h1 · 8 + h2 · 82 + · · · , which is the octal expansion (. . . h1 h1 h0 )8 . 17. 1 1101 1100 1010 1101 0001, 1273)8 19. Convert the given octal numeral to binary, then convert from binary to hexadecimal using Example 7. 21. a) 1011 1110, 10 0001 0000 0001 b) 1 1010 1100, 1011 0000 0111 0011 c) 100 1001 1010, 101 0010 1001 0110 0000 d) 110 0000 0000, 1000 0000 0001 1111 1111 23. a) 1132, 144,305 b) 6273, 2,134,272 c) 2110, 1,107,667 d) 57,777, 237,326,216 25. 436 27. 27 29. The binary expansion of the integer is the unique such sum. 31. Let a = (an−1 an−2 . . . a1 a0 )10 . Then a = 10n−1 an−1 + 10n−2 an−2 + · · · + 10a1 + a0 ≡ an−1 + an−2 + · · · + a1 + a0 (mod 3), because

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-25

10j ≡ 1 (mod 3)) for all nonnegative integers j . It follows that 3 | a if and only if 3 divides the sum of the decimal digits of a. 33. Let a = (an−1 an−2 . . . a1 a0 )2 . Then a = a0 + 2a1 + 22 a2 + · · · + 2n−1 an−1 ≡ a0 − a1 + a2 − a3 + · · · ± an−1 (mod 3). It follows that a is divisible by 3 if and only if the sum of the binary digits in the evennumbered positions minus the sum of the binary digits in the odd-numbered positions is divisible by 3. 35. a) −6 b) 13 c) −14 d) 0 37. The one’s complement of the sum is found by adding the one’s complements of the two integers except that a carry in the leading bit is used as a carry to the last bit of the sum. 39. If m ≥ 0, then the leading bit an−1 of the one’s complement expansion of m is 0 and the formula reads i m = n−2 i=0 ai 2 . This is correct because the right-hand side is the binary expansion of m. When m is negative, the leading bit an−1 of the one’s complement expansion of m is 1. The remaining n − 1 bits can be obtained by subtracting −m from 111 . . . 1 (where there are n − 1 1s), because subtracting a bit from 1 is the same as complementing it. Hence, the bit string an−2 . . . a0 is the binary expansion of (2n−1 − 1) − (−m). i Solving the equation (2n−1 − 1) − (−m) = n−2 i=0 ai 2 for m gives the desired equation because an−1 = 1. 41. a) −7 b) 13 c) −15 d) −1 43. To obtain the two’s complement representation of the sum of two integers, add their two’s complement representations (as binary integers are added) and ignore any carry out of the leftmost column. However, the answer is invalid if an overflow has occurred. This happens when the leftmost digits in the two’s complement representation of the two terms agree and the leftmost digit of the answer differs. 45. If m ≥ 0, then the leading bit an−1 is 0 and the i formula reads m = n−2 i=0 ai 2 . This is correct because the right-hand side is the binary expansion of m. If m < 0, its two’s complement expansion has 1 as its leading bit and the remaining n−1 bits are the binary expansion of 2n−1 − (−m). i This means that (2n−1 ) − (−m) = n−2 i=0 ai 2 . Solving for m gives the desired equation because an−1 = 1. 47. 4n 49. procedure Cantor(x: positive integer) n := 1; f := 1 while (n + 1) · f ≤ x n := n + 1 f := f · n y := x while n > 0 an := y/f y := y − an · f f := f/n n := n − 1 {x = an n! + an−1 (n − 1)! + · · · + a1 1!} 51. First step: c = 0, d = 0, s0 = 1; second step: c = 0, d = 1, s1 = 0; third step: c = 1, d = 1, s2 = 0; fourth step: c = 1, d = 1, s3 = 0; fifth step: c = 1, d = 1, s4 = 1; sixth step: c = 1, s5 = 1

53. procedure subtract(a, b: positive integers, a > b, a = (an−1 an−2 . . . a1 a0 )2 , b = (bn−1 bn−2 . . . b1 b0 )2 ) B := 0 {B is the borrow} for j := 0 to n − 1 if aj ≥ bj + B then sj := aj − bj − B B := 0 else sj := aj + 2 − bj − B B := 1 {(sn−1 sn−2 . . . s1 s0 )2 is the difference} 55. procedure compare(a, b: positive integers, a = (an an−1 . . . a1 a0 )2 , b = (bn bn−1 . . . b1 b0 )2 ) k := n while ak = bk and k > 0 k := k − 1 if ak = bk then print “a equals b” if ak > bk then print “a is greater than b” if ak < bk then print “a is less than b” 57. O(log n) 59. The only time-consuming part of the algorithm is the while loop, which is iterated q times. The work done inside is a subtraction of integers no bigger than a, which has log a bits. The result now follows from Example 9.

Section 4.3 1. 29, 71, 97 prime; 21, 111, 143 not prime 3. a) 23 · 11 b) 2 · 32 · 7 c) 36 d) 7 · 11 · 13 e) 11 · 101 f) 2 · 33 · 5 · 7 · 13 · 37 5. 28 · 34 · 52 · 7 7.

procedure primetester(n : integer greater than 1) isprime := true d := 2 √ while isprime and d ≤ n if n mod d = 0 then isprime := false else d := d + 1 return isprime

9. Write n = rs, where r > 1 and s > 1. Then 2n − 1 = 2rs − 1 = (2r )s − 1 = (2r − 1)((2r )s−1 + (2r )s−2 + (2r )s−3 + · · · + 1). The first factor is at least 22 − 1 = 3 and the second factor is at least 22 + 1 = 5. This provides a factoring of 2n − 1 into two factors greater than 1, so 2n − 1 is composite. 11. Suppose that log2 3 = a/b where a, b ∈ Z+ and b = 0. Then 2a/b = 3, so 2a = 3b . This violates the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. Hence, log2 3 is irrational. 13. 3, 5, and 7 are primes of the desired form. 15. 1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 17. a) Yes b) No c) Yes d) Yes 19. Suppose that n is not prime, so that n = ab, where a and b are integers greater than 1. Because a > 1, by the identity in the hint, 2a −1 is a factor of 2n −1 that is greater than 1, and the second

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-26

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

factor in this identity is also greater than 1. Hence, 2n âˆ’ 1 is not prime. 21. a) 2 b) 4 c) 12 23. Ď†(pk ) = p k âˆ’ pkâˆ’1 25. a) 35 Âˇ 53 b) 1 c) 2317 d) 41 Âˇ 43 Âˇ 53 e) 1 f) 1111 27. a) 211 Âˇ 37 Âˇ 59 Âˇ 73 b) 29 Âˇ 37 Âˇ 55 Âˇ 73 Âˇ 11 Âˇ 13 Âˇ 17 c) 2331 d) 41 Âˇ 43 Âˇ 53 e) 212 313 517 721 f) Undefined 29. gcd (92928, 123552) = 1056; lcm(92928, 123552) = 10,872,576; both products are 11,481,440,256. 31. Because min(x, y) + max(x, y) = x + y, the exponent of pi in the prime factorization of gcd(a, b) Âˇ lcm(a, b) is the sum of the exponents of pi in the prime factorizations of a and b. 33. a) 6 b) 3 c) 11 d) 3 e) 40 f) 12 35. 9 37. By Exercise 36 it follows that gcd(2b âˆ’ 1, (2a âˆ’ 1) mod (2b âˆ’ 1)) = gcd(2b âˆ’ 1, 2a mod b âˆ’ 1). Because the exponents involved in the calculation are b and a mod b, the same as the quantities involved in computing gcd(a, b), the steps used by the Euclidean algorithm to compute gcd(2a âˆ’ 1, 2b âˆ’ 1) run in parallel to those used to compute gcd(a, b) and show that gcd(2a âˆ’ 1, 2b âˆ’ 1) = 2gcd(a,b) âˆ’ 1. 39. a) 1 = (âˆ’1) Âˇ 10 + 1 Âˇ 11 b) 1 = 21 Âˇ 21 + (âˆ’10) Âˇ 44 c) 12 = (âˆ’1) Âˇ 36 + 48 d) 1 = 13 Âˇ 55 + (âˆ’21) Âˇ 34 e) 3 = 11Âˇ213+(âˆ’20)Âˇ117 f) 223 = 1Âˇ0+1Âˇ223 g) 1 = 37Âˇ 2347 + (âˆ’706) Âˇ 123 h) 2 = 1128 Âˇ 3454 +(âˆ’835) Âˇ 4666 i) 1 = 2468 Âˇ 9999+(âˆ’2221)Âˇ11111 41. (âˆ’3)Âˇ26+1Âˇ91 = 13 43. 34 Âˇ 144 + (âˆ’55) Âˇ 89 = 1 45. procedure extended Euclidean(a, b: positive integers) x := a y := b oldolds := 1 olds := 0 oldoldt := 0 oldt := 1 while y = 0 q := x div y r := x mod y x := y y := r s := oldolds âˆ’ q Âˇ olds t := oldoldt âˆ’ q Âˇ oldt oldolds := olds oldoldt := oldt olds := s oldt := t {gcd(a, b) is x, and (oldolds)a + (oldoldt)b = x} 47. a) an = 1 if n is prime and an = 0 otherwise. b) an is the smallest prime factor of n with a1 = 1. c) an is the number of positive divisors of n. d) an = 1 if n has no divisors that are perfect squares greater than 1 and an = 0 otherwise. e) an is the largest prime less than or equal to n. f) an is the product of the first n âˆ’ 1 primes. 49. Because every second integer is divisible by 2, the product is divisible by 2. Because every third integer is divisible by 3, the product is divisible by 3. Therefore the product has both 2 and 3 in its prime factorization and is therefore divisible by 3Âˇ2 = 6. 51. n = 1601 is a counterexample. 53 Setting k = a +b +1 will produce the composite number a(a + b + 1) + b = a 2 + ab + a + b = (a + 1)(a + b).

55. Suppose that there are only finitely many primes of the form 4k + 3, namely q1 , q2 , . . . , qn , where q1 = 3, q2 = 7, and so on. Let Q = 4q1 q2 Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ qn âˆ’1. Note that Q is of the form 4k + 3 (where k = q1 q2 Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ qn âˆ’ 1). If Q is prime, then we have found a prime of the desired form different from all those listed. If Q is not prime, then Q has at least one prime factor not in the list q1 , q2 , . . . , qn , because the remainder when Q is divided by qj is qj âˆ’ 1, and qj âˆ’ 1 = 0. Because all odd primes are either of the form 4k + 1 or of the form 4k + 3, and the product of primes of the form 4k + 1 is also of this form (because (4k +1)(4m+1) = 4(4km+k +m)+1), there must be a factor of Q of the form 4k + 3 different from the primes we listed. 57. Given a positive integer x, we show that there is exactly one positive rational number m/n (in lowest terms) such that K(m/n) = x. From the prime factorization of x, read off the m and n such that K(m/n) = x. The primes that occur to even powers are the primes that occur in the prime factorization of m, with the exponents being half the corresponding exponents in x; and the primes that occur to odd powers are the primes that occur in the prime factorization of n, with the exponents being half of one more than the exponents in x.

Section 4.4 1. 15 Âˇ 7 = 105 â‰Ą 1 (mod 26) 3. 7 5. a) 7 b) 52 c) 34 d) 73 7. Suppose that b and c are both inverses of a modulo m. Then ba â‰Ą 1 (mod m) and ca â‰Ą 1 (mod m). Hence, ba â‰Ą ca (mod m). Because gcd(a, m) = 1 it follows by Theorem 7 in Section 4.3 that b â‰Ą c (mod m). 9. 8 11. a) 67 b) 88 c) 146 13. 3 and 6 15. Let m = m/ gcd(c, m). Because all the common factors of m and c are divided out of m to obtain m , it follows that m and c are relatively prime. Because m divides ac âˆ’ bc = (a âˆ’ b)c, it follows that m divides (a âˆ’ b)c. By Lemma 3 in Section 4.3, we see that m divides a âˆ’ b, so a â‰Ą b (mod m ). 17. Suppose that x 2 â‰Ą 1 (mod p). Then p divides x 2 âˆ’ 1 = (x + 1)(x âˆ’ 1). By Lemma 2 it follows that p | x + 1 or p | x âˆ’ 1, so x â‰Ą âˆ’1 (mod p) or x â‰Ą 1 (mod p). 19. a) Suppose that ia â‰Ą j a (mod p), where 1 â‰¤ i < j < p. Then p divides j a âˆ’ ia = a(j âˆ’ i). By Theorem 1, because a is not divisible by p, p divides j âˆ’ i, which is impossible because j âˆ’ i is a positive integer less than p. b) By part (a), because no two of a, 2a, . . . , (p âˆ’ 1)a are congruent modulo p, each must be congruent to a different number from 1 to p âˆ’1. It follows that a Âˇ 2a Âˇ 3a Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ (p âˆ’ 1) Âˇ a â‰Ą 1 Âˇ 2 Âˇ 3 Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ (p âˆ’ 1) (mod p). It follows that (p âˆ’1)!Âˇa pâˆ’1 â‰Ą p âˆ’1 (mod p). c) By Wilsonâ€™s theorem and part (b), if p does not divide a, it follows that (âˆ’1) Âˇ a pâˆ’1 â‰Ą âˆ’1 (mod p). Hence, a pâˆ’1 â‰Ą 1 (mod p). d) If p | a, then p | a p . Hence, a p â‰Ą a â‰Ą 0 (mod p). If p does not divide a, then a pâˆ’1 â‰Ą a (mod p), by part (c). Multiplying both sides of this congruence by a gives a p â‰Ą a (mod p). 21. All integers of the form 323 + 330k, where k is an integer 23. All integers of the form 53 + 60k, where k is an integer

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-27

25. procedure chinese(m1 , m2 , . . . , mn : relatively prime positive integers ; a1 , a2 , . . . , an : integers) m := 1 for k := 1 to n m := m · mk for k := 1 to n Mk := m/mk yk := Mk−1 mod mk x := 0 for k := 1 to n x := x + ak Mk yk while x ≥ m x := x − m return x {the smallest solution to the system {x ≡ ak (mod mk ), k = 1, 2, . . . , n }} 27. All integers of the form 16 + 252k, where k is an integer 29. Suppose that p is a prime appearing in the prime factorization of m1 m2 · · · mn . Because the mi s are relatively prime, p is a factor of exactly one of the mi s, say mj . Because mj divides a − b, it follows that a − b has the factor p in its prime factorization to a power at least as large as the power to which it appears in the prime factorization of mj . It follows that m1 m2 · · · mn divides a − b, so a ≡ b (mod m1 m2 · · · mn ). 31. x ≡ 1 (mod 6) 33. 7 35. a p−2 · a = a · a p−2 = a p−1 ≡ 1 (mod p) 37. a) By Fermat’s little theorem, we have 210 ≡ 1 (mod 11). Hence, 2340 = (210 )34 ≡ 134 = 1 (mod 11). b) Because 32 ≡ 1 (mod 31), it follows that 2340 = (25 )68 = 3268 ≡ 168 = 1 (mod 31). c) Because 11 and 31 are relatively prime, and 11 · 31 = 341, it follows by parts (a) and (b) and Exercise 29 that 2340 ≡ 1 (mod 341). 39. a) 3, 4, 8 b) 983 41. Suppose that q is an odd prime with q | 2p −1. By Fermat’s little theorem, q | 2q−1 − 1. From Exercise 37 in Section 4.3, gcd(2p − 1, 2q−1 − 1) = 2gcd(p,q−1) − 1. Because q is a common divisor of 2p −1 and 2q−1 −1, gcd(2p −1, 2q−1 −1) > 1. Hence, gcd(p, q − 1) = p, because the only other possibility, namely, gcd(p, q −1) = 1, gives us gcd(2p −1, 2q−1 −1) = 1. Hence, p | q − 1, and therefore there is a positive integer m such that q − 1 = mp. Because q is odd, m must be even, say, m = 2k, and so every prime divisor of 2p − 1 is of the form 2kp + 1. Furthermore, the product of numbers of this form is also of this form. Therefore, all divisors of 2p − 1 are of this form. 43. M11 is not prime; M17 is prime. 45. First, 2047 = 23 · 89 is composite. Write 2047 − 1 = 2046 = 2 · 1023, so s = 1 and t = 1023 in the definition. Then 21023 = (211 )93 = 204893 ≡ 193 = 1 (mod 2047), as desired. 47. We must show that b2820 ≡ 1 (mod 2821) for all b relatively prime to 2821. Note that 2821 = 7 · 13 · 31, and if gcd(b, 2821) = 1, then gcd(b, 7) = gcd(b, 13) = gcd(b, 31) = 1. Using Fermat’s little theorem we find that b6 ≡ 1 (mod 7), b12 ≡ 1 (mod 13), and b30 ≡ 1 (mod 31). It follows that b2820 ≡ (b6 )470 ≡ 1 (mod 7), b2820 ≡ (b12 )235 ≡ 1 (mod 13), and b2820 ≡ (b30 )94 ≡ 1 (mod 31). By Exercise 29 (or the Chinese remainder theorem) it follows that b2820 ≡ 1 (mod 2821), as desired. 49. a) If we multiply out this expression, we get

n = 1296m3 + 396m2 + 36m + 1. Clearly 6m | n − 1, 12m | n − 1, and 18m | n − 1. Therefore, the conditions of Exercise 48 are met, and we conclude that n is a Carmichael number. b) Letting m = 51 gives n = 172,947,529. 51. 0 = (0, 0), 1 = (1, 1), 2 = (2, 2), 3 = (0, 3), 4 = (1, 4), 5 = (2, 0), 6 = (0, 1), 7 = (1, 2), 8 = (2, 3), 9 = (0, 4), 10 = (1, 0), 11 = (2, 1), 12 = (0, 2), 13 = (1, 3), 14 = (2, 4) 53. We have m1 = 99, m2 = 98, m3 = 97, and m4 = 95, so m = 99 · 98 · 97 · 95 = 89,403,930. We find that M1 = m/m1 = 903,070, M2 = m/m2 = 912,285, M3 = m/m3 = 921,690, and M4 = m/m4 = 941,094. Using the Euclidean algorithm, we compute that y1 = 37, y2 = 33, y3 = 24, and y4 = 4 are inverses of Mk modulo mk for k = 1, 2, 3, 4, respectively. It follows that the solution is 65 · 903,070 · 37 + 2 · 912,285 · 33 + 51 · 921,690 · 24 + 10 · 941,094 · 4 = 3,397,886,480 ≡ 537,140 (mod 89,403,930). 55. log2 5 = 16, log2 6 = 14 57. log3 1 = 0, log3 2 = 14, log3 3 = 1, log3 4 = 12, log3 5 = 5, log3 6 = 15, log3 7 = 11, log3 8 = 10, log3 9 = 2, log3 10 = 3, log3 11 = 7, log3 12 = 13, log3 13 = 4, log3 14 = 9, log3 15 = 6, log3 16 = 8 59. Assume that s is a solution of x 2 ≡ a (mod p). Then because (−s)2 = s 2 , −s is also a solution. Furthermore, s ≡ −s (mod p). Otherwise, p | 2s, which implies that p | s, and this implies, using the original assumption, that p | a, which is a contradiction. Furthermore, if s and t are incongruent solutions modulo p, then because s 2 ≡ t 2 (mod p), p | s 2 − t 2 . This implies that p | (s + t)(s − t), and by Lemma 3 in Section 4.3, p | s − t or p | s + t, so s ≡ t (mod p) or s ≡ −t (mod p).Hence, there are at most two solutions. 61. The value of pa depends only on whether a is a quadratic residue modulo p, that is, whether x 2 ≡ a (mod p) has a solution. Because this depends only on the equivalence class of a modulo p, it follows that pa = pb if a ≡ b (mod p). 63. By Exercise 62, a b (p−1)/2 b(p−1)/2 = (ab)(p−1)/2 ≡ ab (mod p). p p =a p 65. x ≡ 8, 13, 22, or 27 (mod 35) 67. Compute r e mod p for e = 0, 1, 2, . . . , p − 2 until we get the answer a. Worst case and average case time complexity are O(p log p).

Section 4.5 1. 91, 57, 21, 5 3. a) 7, 19, 7, 7, 18, 0 b) Take the next available space mod 31. 5. 1, 5, 4, 1, 5, 4, 1, 5, 4, . . . 7. 2, 6, 7, 10, 8, 2, 6, 7, 10, 8, . . . 9. 2357, 5554, 8469, 7239, 4031, 2489, 1951, 8064 11. 2, 1, 1, 1, . . . 13. Only string (d) 15. 4 17. Correctly, of course 19. a) Not valid b) Valid c) Valid d) Not valid 21. a) No b) 5 c) 7 d) 8 23. Transposition errors involving the last digit 25. a) Yes b) No c) Yes d) No 27. Transposition errors will be detected if and only if the transposed digits are an odd number of positions apart and do not differ by 5. 29. a) Valid b) Not valid c) Valid d) Valid 31. Yes, as long as the two digits do not differ by 7 33. a) Not valid b) Valid c) Valid d) Not valid 35. The given congruence is equivalent to 3d1 + 4d2 + 5d3 + 6d4 + 7d5 + 8d6 + 9d7 + 10d8 ≡ 0 (mod 11). Transposing adjacent digits x and y (with x on the

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-28

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

left) causes the left-hand side to increase by x − y. Because x ≡ y (mod 11), the congruence will no longer hold. Therefore errors of this type are always detected.

Section 4.6 1. a) GR QRW SDVV JR b) QB ABG CNFF TB c) QX UXM AHJJ ZX 3. a) KOHQV MCIF GHSD b) RVBXP TJPZ NBZX c) DBYNE PHRM FYZA 5. a) SURRENDER NOW b) BE MY FRIEND c) TIME FOR FUN 7. TO SLEEP PERCHANCE TO DREAM 9. ANY SUFFICIENTLY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY IS INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM MAGIC 11. p = 7c + 13 mod 26 13. a = 18, b = 5 15. BEWARE OF MARTIANS 17. Presumably something like an affine cipher 19. HURRICANE 21. The length of the key may well be the greatest common divisor of the distances between the starts of the repeated string (or a factor of the gcd). 23. Suppose we know both n = pq and (p−1)(q −1). To find p and q, first note that (p − 1)(q − 1) = pq − p − q + 1 = n − (p + q) + 1. From this we can find s = p + q. Because q = s − p, we have n = p(s − p). Hence, p 2 − ps + n = 0. We now can use the quadratic formula to find p. Once we have found p, we can find q because q = n/p. 25. 2545 2757 1211 27. SILVER 29. Alice sends 58 mod 23 = 16 to Bob. Bob sends 55 mod 23 = 20 to Alice. Alice computes 208 mod 23 = 6 and Bob computes 165 mod 23 = 6. The shared key is 6. 31. 2186 2087 1279 1251 0326 0816 1948 33. Alice can decrypt the first part of Cathy’s message to learn the key, and Bob can decrypt the second part of Cathy’s message, which Alice forwarded to him, to learn the key. No one else besides Cathy can learn the key, because all of these communications use secure private keys.

Supplementary Exercises 1. The actual number of miles driven is 46518 + 100000k for some natural number k. 3. 5, 22, −12, −29 5. Because ac ≡ bc (mod m) there is an integer k such that ac = bc + km. Hence, a − b = km/c. Because a − b is an integer, c | km. Letting d = gcd(m, c), write c = de. Because no factor of e divides m/d, it follows that d | m and e | k. Thus a − b = (k/e)(m/d), where k/e ∈ Z and m/d ∈ Z. Therefore a ≡ b (mod m/d). 7. Proof of the contrapositive: If n is odd, then n = 2k + 1 for some integer k. Therefore n2 + 1 = (2k + 1)2 + 1 = 4k 2 + 4k + 2 ≡ 2 (mod 4). But perfect squares of even numbers are congruent to 0 modulo 4 (because (2m)2 = 4m2 ), and perfect squares of odd numbers are congruent to 1 or 3 modulo 4, so n2 + 1 is not a perfect square. 9. n is divisible by 8 if and only if the binary expansion of n ends with 000. 11. We assume that someone has chosen a positive integer less than 2n , which we are to guess. We ask the person to write the number in binary, using leading 0s if necessary to make it n bits long. We then ask “Is the first bit a 1?”, “Is the second bit a 1?”, “Is the third bit a 1?”, and so

on. After we know the answers to these n questions, we will know the number, because we expansion. will know its binary 13. (an an−1 . . . a1 a0 )10 = nk=0 10k ak ≡ nk=0 ak (mod 9) because 10k ≡ 1 (mod 9) for every nonnegative integer k. 15. Because for all k ≤ n, when Qn is divided by k the remainder will be 1, it follows that no prime number less than or equal to n is a factor of Qn . Thus by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, Qn must have a prime factor greater than n. 17. Take a = 10 and b = 1 in Dirichlet’s theorem. 19. Every number greater than 11 can be written as either 8+2n or 9+2n for some n ≥ 2. 21. Assume that every even integer greater than 2 is the sum of two primes, and let n be an integer greater than 5. If n is odd, write n = 3 + (n − 3) and decompose n − 3 = p + q into the sum of two primes; if n is even, then write n = 2 + (n − 2) and decompose n − 2 = p + q into the sum of two primes. For the converse, assume that every integer greater than 5 is the sum of three primes, and let n be an even integer greater than 2. Write n + 2 as the sum of three primes, one of which is necessarily 2, so n + 2 = 2 + p + q, whence n = p + q. 23. Recall that a nonconstant polynomial can take on the same value only a finite number of times. Thus f can take on the values 0 and ±1 only finitely many times, so if there is not some y such that f (y) is composite, then there must be some x0 such that ±f (x0 ) is prime, say p. Look at f (x0 + kp). When we plug x0 + kp in for x in the polynomial and multiply it out, every term will contain a factor of p except for the terms that form f (x0 ). Therefore f (x0 +kp) = f (x0 )+mp = (m±1)p for some integer m. As k varies, this value can be 0, p, or −p only finitely many times; therefore it must be a composite number for some values of k. 25. 1 27. 1 29. If not, then suppose that q1 , q2 , . . . , qn are all the primes of the form 6k + 5. Let Q = 6q1 q2 · · · qn − 1. Note that Q is of the form 6k + 5, where k = q1 q2 · · · qn − 1. Let Q = p1 p2 · · · pt be the prime factorization of Q. No pi is 2, 3, or any qj , because the remainder when Q is divided by 2 is 1, by 3 is 2, and by qj is qj − 1. All odd primes other than 3 are of the form 6k + 1 or 6k + 5, and the product of primes of the form 6k + 1 is also of this form. Therefore at least one of the pi ’s must be of the form 6k +5, a contradiction. 31. The product of numbers of the form 4k + 1 is of the form 4k + 1, but numbers of this form might have numbers not of this form as their only prime factors. For example, 49 = 4 · 12 + 1, but the prime factorization of 49 is 7 · 7 = (4 · 1 + 3)(4 · 1 + 3). 33. a) Not mutually relatively prime b) Mutually relatively prime c) Mutually relatively prime d) Mutually relatively prime 35 1 37. x ≡ 28 (mod 30) 39. By the Chinese remainder theorem, it suffices to show that n9 − n ≡ 0 (mod 2), n9 − n ≡ 0 (mod 3), and n9 − n ≡ 0 (mod 5). Each in turn follows from applying Fermat’s little theorem. 41. By Fermat’s little theorem, p q−1 ≡ 1 (mod q) and clearly q p−1 ≡ 0 (mod q). Therefore p q−1 + q p−1 ≡ 1 + 0 = 1 (mod q). Similarly, p q−1 + q p−1 ≡ 1 (mod p). It follows from the Chinese remainder theorem that p q−1 + q p−1 ≡ 1 (mod pq). 43. If ai is changed from x to y, then the change in the left-hand side of the congruence is either y − x or 3(y − x), modulo 10, neither of which can be 0 because 1 and

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-29

3 are relatively prime to 10. Therefore the sum can no longer be 0 modulo 10. 45. Working modulo 10, solve for d9 . The check digit for 11100002 is 5. 47. PLEASE SEND MONEY 49. a) QAL HUVEM AT WVESGB b) QXB EVZZL ZEVZZRFS

CHAPTER 5 Section 5.1 1. Let P (n) be the statement that the train stops at station n. Basis step: We are told that P (1) is true. Inductive step: We are told that P (n) implies P (n + 1) for each n ≥ 1. Therefore by the principle of mathematical induction, P (n) is true for all positive integers n. 3. a) 12 = 1 · 2 · 3/6 b) Both sides of P (1) shown in part (a) equal 1. c) 12 + 22 + · · · + k 2 = k(k + 1)(2k + 1)/6 d) For each k ≥ 1 that P (k) implies P (k + 1); in other words, that assuming the inductive hypothesis [see part (c)] we can show 12 + 22 + · · · + k 2 + (k + 1)2 = (k + 1)(k + 2)(2k + 3)/6 e) (12 + 22 + · · · + k 2 ) + (k + 1)2 = [k(k + 1)(2k + 1)/6] + (k + 1)2 = [(k + 1)/6][k(2k + 1) + 6(k + 1)] = [(k + 1)/6](2k 2 + 7k + 6) = [(k + 1)/6](k + 2)(2k + 3) = (k + 1)(k + 2)(2k + 3)/6 f) We have completed both the basis step and the inductive step, so by the principle of mathematical induction, the statement is true for every positive integer n. 5. Let P (n) be “12 + 32 + · · · + (2n + 1)2 = (n + 1)(2n + 1)(2n + 3)/3.” Basis step: P (0) is true because 12 = 1 = (0+1)(2·0+1)(2·0+3)/3. Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true. Then 12 + 32 + · · · + (2k + 1)2 + [2(k + 1) + 1]2 = (k + 1)(2k + 1)(2k + 3)/3 + (2k + 3)2 = (2k + 3)[(k + 1)(2k +1)/3+(2k +3)] = (2k +3)(2k 2 +9k +10)/3 = (2k + 3)(2k+5)(k+2)/3 = [(k+1)+1][2(k+1)+1][2(k+1)+3]/3. 7. Let P (n) be “ nj=0 3 · 5j = 3(5n+1 − 1)/4.” Basis step: P (0) is true because 0j =0 3 · 5j = 3 = 3(51 − 1)/4. Inductive step: Assume that kj =0 3 · 5j = 3(5k+1 − 1)/4. k j j k+1 = 3(5k+1 − Then k+1 j =0 3 · 5 = ( j =0 3 · 5 ) + 3 · 5 k+1 k+1 k+1 = 3(5 +4·5 − 1)/4 = 3(5k+2 − 1)/4. 1)/4 + 3 · 5 9. a) 2+4+6+· · ·+2n = n(n+1) b) Basis step: 2 = 1·(1+1) is true. Inductive step: Assume that 2 + 4 + 6 + · · · + 2k = k(k + 1). Then (2 + 4 + 6 + · · · + 2k) + 2(k + 1) = k(k + 1) + 2(k + 1) = (k + 1)(k + 2). 11. a) nj=1 1/2j = (2n − 1)/2n b) Basis step: P (1) is true because 21 = (21 − 1)/21 . Inductive step: Assume that kj =1 1/2j = (2k −1)/2k . k+1 1 k k 1 1 Then j =1 2j = ( j =1 21j ) + 2k+1 = 2 2−1 + 2k+1 = k 2k+1 −2+1 2k+1

k+1

= 2 2k+1−1 . 13. Let P (n) be “12 − 22 + 32 − · · · + (−1)n−1 n2 = (−1)n−1 n(n + 1)/2.” Basis step: P (1) is true because 12 = 1 = (−1)0 12 . Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true. Then 12 − 22 + 32 − · · · + (−1)k−1 k 2 + (−1)k (k + 1)2 = (−1)k−1 k(k + 1)/2 + (−1)k (k + 1)2 = (−1)k (k + 1)[−k/2 + (k + 1)] = (−1)k (k + 1)[(k/2) + 1] = (−1)k (k + 1)(k + 2)/2. 15. Let P (n) be “1 · 2 + 2 · 3 + · · · + n(n+1) = n(n+1)(n+2)/3.” Basis step: P (1) is true because

1·2 = 2 = 1(1+1)(1+2)/3. Inductive step:Assume that P (k) is true. Then 1·2+2·3+· · ·+k(k+1)+(k+1)(k+2) = [k(k+ 1)(k + 2)/3] + (k + 1)(k + 2) = (k + 1)(k + 2)[(k/3) + 1] = (k + 1)(k + 2)(k + 3)/3. 17. Let P (n) be the statement that 14 +24 +34 +· · · + n4 = n(n+1)(2n+1)(3n2 +3n−1)/30. P (1) is true because 1 · 2 · 3 · 5/30 = 1. Assume that P (k) is true. Then (14 + 24 + 34 + · · · + k 4 ) + (k + 1)4 = k(k + 1)(2k + 1)(3k 2 + 3k − 1)/30 + (k + 1)4 = [(k + 1)/30][k(2k + 1)(3k 2 + 3k − 1) + 30(k + 1)3 ] = [(k + 1)/30](6k 4 + 39k 3 + 91k 2 + 89k + 30) = [(k + 1)/30](k + 2)(2k + 3)[3(k + 1)2 + 3(k + 1) − 1]. This demonstrates that P (k + 1) is true. 19. a) 1 + 41 < 2 − 21 b) This is true because 5/4 is less than 6/4. c) 1+ 41 + · · · + k12 < 2 − k1 d) For each k ≥ 2 that P (k) implies P (k + 1); in other words, we want to show that assuming the inductive hypothesis [see 1 1 part (c)] we can show 1 + 41 + · · · + k12 + (k+1) 2 < 2 − k+1 1 1 1 1 1 e) 1 + 4 + · · · + k 2 + (k+1)2 < 2 − k + (k+1)2 =

k 2 +2k+1−k 1 k 2 +k 1 2− k1 − (k+1) = 2− k(k+1) 2 = 2− 2 − k(k+1)2 = k(k+1)2 1 1 1 2 − k+1 − k(k+1)2 < 2 − k+1 f) We have completed both the basis step and the inductive step, so by the principle of mathematical induction, the statement is true for every integer n greater than 1. 21. Let P (n) be “2n > n2 .” Basis step: P (5) is true because 25 = 32 > 25 = 52 . Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true, that is, 2k > k 2 . Then 2k+1 = 2 · 2k > k 2 + k 2 > k 2 + 4k ≥ k 2 + 2k + 1 = (k + 1)2 because k > 4. 23. By inspection we find that the inequality 2n + 3 ≤ 2n does not hold for n = 0, 1, 2, 3. Let P (n) be the proposition that this inequality holds for the positive integer n. P (4), the basis case, is true because 2 · 4 + 3 = 11 ≤ 16 = 24 . For the inductive step assume that P (k) is true. Then, by the inductive hypothesis, 2(k+1)+3 = (2k+3)+2 < 2k +2. But because k ≥ 1, 2k +2 ≤ 2k +2k = 2k+1 . This shows that P (k+1) is true. 25. Let P (n) be “1 + nh ≤ (1 + h)n , h > −1.” Basis step: P (0) is true because 1 + 0 · h = 1 ≤ 1 = (1 + h)0 . Inductive step: Assume 1 + kh ≤ (1 + h)k . Then because (1+h) > 0, (1+h)k+1 = (1+h)(1+h)k ≥ (1+h)(1+kh) = 2 1 +√(k + 1)h 1)h. 27. Let P (n) be √ + kh √≥ 1 + (k +√ √ 2 n +1 − 1 .” “1/ 1 + 1/ 2 + 1/ 3 + · · · + 1/ n > √ 2 −√1 . InducBasis step: P (1) is true because 1 > 2 tive√step: Assume that P (k) is true. Then 1 + 1/ 2 + · · · + √ √ √ k + 1 > 2 k +√1 − 1 + 1/√k + 1. If we 1/ k + 1/ √ show that 2 k + 1 − 1 + 1/ k + 1 > 2 k + 2 − 1 , it follows that P (k + 1) is true. This inequality is equiv √ √ √ k√ +2− k+ < alent to 2 √1/ k + 1, is √1 √ which k + 2 − k + 1 k + 2+ k + 1 < equivalent to 2 √ √ √ √ k + 1/ k√+ 1 + √ k + 2/ k + 1. This is equivalent to 2 < 1 + k + 2/ k + 1, which is clearly true. 29. Let P (n) be “H2n ≤ 1 + n.” Basis step: P (0) is true because H20 = H1 = 1 ≤ 1 + 0. Inductive step: Assume k+1 that H2k ≤ 1 + k. Then H2k+1 = H2k + 2j =2k +1 j1 ≤ 1 1 + k + 2k 2k+1 < 1 + k + 1 = 1 + (k + 1). 31. Basis

step: 12 + 1 = 2 is divisible by 2. Inductive step: Assume the inductive hypothesis, that k 2 + k is divisible by 2. Then (k +1)2 +(k +1) = k 2 +2k +1+k +1 = (k 2 +k)+2(k +1),

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-30

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

the sum of a multiple of 2 (by the inductive hypothesis) and a multiple of 2 (by definition), hence, divisible by 2. 33. Let P (n) be “n5 − n is divisible by 5.” Basis step: P (0) is true because 05 − 0 = 0 is divisible by 5. Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true, that is, k 5 − 5 is divisible by 5. Then (k+1)5 −(k+1) = (k 5 +5k 4 +10k 3 +10k 2 +5k+1)−(k+1) = (k 5 − k) + 5(k 4 + 2k 3 + 2k 2 + k) is also divisible by 5, because both terms in this sum are divisible by 5. 35. Let P (n) be the proposition that (2n − 1)2 − 1 is divisible by 8. The basis case P (1) is true because 8 | 0. Now assume that P (k) is true. Because [(2(k + 1) − 1]2 − 1 = [(2k − 1)2 − 1] + 8k, P (k + 1) is true because both terms on the right-hand side are divisible by 8. This shows that P (n) is true for all positive integers n, so m2 − 1 is divisible by 8 whenever m is an odd positive integer. 37. Basis step: 111+1 +122·1−1 = 121+12 = 133 Inductive step: Assume the inductive hypothesis, that 11n+1 + 122n−1 is divisible by 133. Then 11(n+1)+1 + 122(n+1)−1 = 11 · 11n+1 + 144 · 122n−1 = 11 · 11n+1 + (11 + 133) · 122n−1 = 11(11n+1 + 122n−1 ) + 133 · 122n−1 . The expression in parentheses is divisible by 133 by the inductive hypothesis, and obviously the second term is divisible by 133, so the entire quantity is divisible by 133, as desired. 39. Basis step: A1 ⊆ B1 tautologically im plies that 1j =1 Aj ⊆ 1j =1 Bj . Inductive step: Assume the inductive that if Aj ⊆ Bj for j = 1, 2, . . . , k, hypothesis then kj =1 Aj ⊆ kj =1 Bj . We want to show that if Aj ⊆ Bj for j = 1, 2, . . . , k + 1, then k+1 Aj ⊆ k+1 B . Let x k j =1 j k+1 j =1 A ∩ Ak+1 . be an arbitraryelement of j =1 Aj = j j =1 Because x ∈ kj =1 Aj , we know by the inductive hypothe sis that x ∈ kj =1 Bj ; because x ∈ Ak+1 , we know from that x ∈ Bk+1 . Therethe givenfact that A k+1 ⊆ Bk+1 k k+1 fore, x ∈ ∩ B B = 41. Let P (n) be k+1 j =1 j j =1 Bj . “(A1 ∪A2 ∪· · ·∪An )∩B = (A1 ∩B)∪(A2 ∩B)∪· · ·∪(An ∩ B).” Basis step: P (1) is trivially true. Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true. Then (A1 ∪ A2 ∪ · · · ∪ Ak ∪ Ak+1 ) ∩ B = [(A1 ∪ A2 ∪ · · · ∪ Ak ) ∪ Ak+1 ] ∩ B = [(A1 ∪ A2 ∪ · · · ∪ Ak ) ∩ B] ∪ (Ak+1 ∩ B) = [(A1 ∩ B) ∪ (A2 ∩ B) ∪ · · · ∪ (Ak ∩ B)] ∪ (Ak+1 ∩ B) = (A1 ∩ B) ∪ (A2 ∩ B) ∪ · · · ∪ (Ak ∩ B) ∪ (Ak+1 ∩ B). 43. Let P (n) be “ nk=1 Ak = nk=1 Ak .” Basis step: P (1) is trivially true. Inductive step: Assume that k P (k) is true. Then k+1 j =1 Aj ∪ Ak+1 = j =1 Aj = k+1 k k A = A ∩ ∩ Ak+1 = A k+1 j j j =1 j =1 j =1 Aj . 45. Let P (n) be the statement that a set with n elements has n(n − 1)/2 two-element subsets. P (2), the basis case, is true, because a set with two elements has one subset with two elements—namely, itself—and 2(2 − 1)/2 = 1. Now assume that P (k) is true. Let S be a set with k + 1 elements. Choose an element a in S and let T = S − {a}. A two-element subset of S either contains a or does not. Those subsets not containing a are the subsets of T with two elements; by the inductive hypothesis there are k(k − 1)/2 of these. There are k subsets of S with two elements that contain a, because such a subset contains a and one of the k elements in T . Hence, there are k(k−1)/2+k = (k+1)k/2 two-element subsets of S. This

completes the inductive proof. 47. Reorder the locations if necessary so that x1 ≤ x2 ≤ x3 ≤ · · · ≤ xd . Place the first tower at position t1 = x1 + 1. Assume tower k has been placed at position tk . Then place tower k + 1 at position tk+1 = x + 1, where x is the smallest xi greater than tk + 1. 49. The two sets do not overlap if n + 1 = 2. In fact, the conditional statement P (1) → P (2) is false. 51. The mistake is in applying the inductive hypothesis to look at max(x − 1, y − 1), because even though x and y are positive integers, x − 1 and y − 1 need not be (one or both could be 0). 53. For the basis step (n = 2) the first person cuts the cake into two portions that she thinks are each 1/2 of the cake, and the second person chooses the portion he thinks is at least 1/2 of the cake (at least one of the pieces must satisfy that condition). For the inductive step, suppose there are k + 1 people. By the inductive hypothesis, we can suppose that the first k people have divided the cake among themselves so that each person is satisfied that he got at least a fraction 1/k of the cake. Each of them now cuts his or her piece into k +1 pieces of equal size. The last person gets to choose one piece from each of the first k people’s portions. After this is done, each of the first k people is satisfied that she still has (1/k)(k/(k + 1)) = 1/(k + 1) of the cake. To see that the last person is satisfied, suppose that he thought that the ith person (1 ≤ i ≤ k) had a portion pi of the cake, where ki=1 pi = 1. By choosing what he thinks is the largest satisfied that he has at piece from each person, he is least ki=1 pi /(k + 1) = (1/(k + 1)) ki=1 pi = 1/(k + 1) of the cake. 55. We use the notation (i, j ) to mean the square in row i and column j and use induction on i + j to show that every square can be reached by the knight. Basis step: There are six base cases, for the cases when i + j ≤ 2. The knight is already at (0, 0) to start, so the empty sequence of moves reaches that square. To reach (1, 0), the knight moves (0, 0) → (2, 1) → (0, 2) → (1, 0). Similarly, to reach (0, 1), the knight moves (0, 0) → (1, 2) → (2, 0) → (0, 1). Note that the knight has reached (2, 0) and (0, 2) in the process. For the last basis step there is (0, 0) → (1, 2) → (2, 0) → (0, 1) → (2, 2) → (0, 3) → (1, 1). Inductive step: Assume the inductive hypothesis, that the knight can reach any square (i, j ) for which i + j = k, where k is an integer greater than 1. We must show how the knight can reach each square (i, j ) when i + j = k + 1. Because k + 1 ≥ 3, at least one of i and j is at least 2. If i ≥ 2, then by the inductive hypothesis, there is a sequence of moves ending at (i − 2, j + 1), because i − 2 + j + 1 = i + j − 1 = k; from there it is just one step to (i, j ); similarly, if j ≥ 2. 57. Basis step: The base cases n = 0 and n = 1 are true because the derivative of x 0 is 0 and the derivative of x 1 = x is 1. Inductive step: Using the product rule, the inductive hypothd k+1 d esis, and the basis step shows that dx x = dx (x · x k ) = d d k x · dx x +x k dx x = x ·kx k−1 +x k ·1 = kx k +x k = (k +1)x k . 59. Basis step: For k = 0, 1 ≡ 1 (mod m). Inductive step: Suppose that a ≡ b (mod m) and a k ≡ bk (mod m); we must show that a k+1 ≡ bk+1 (mod m). By Theorem 5 from Section 4.1, a · a k ≡ b · bk (mod m), which by defini-

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-31

tion says that a k+1 â‰Ą bk+1 (mod m). 61. Let P (n) be â€œ[(p1 â†’ p2 ) âˆ§ (p2 â†’ p3 ) âˆ§ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆ§ (pnâˆ’1 â†’ pn )] â†’ [(p1 âˆ§ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆ§ pnâˆ’1 ) â†’ pn ].â€? Basis step: P (2) is true because (p1 â†’ p2 ) â†’ (p1 â†’ p2 ) is a tautology. Inductive step: Assume P (k) is true. To show [(p1 â†’ p2 ) âˆ§ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆ§ (pkâˆ’1 â†’ pk ) âˆ§ (pk â†’ pk+1 )] â†’ [(p1 âˆ§ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆ§ pkâˆ’1 âˆ§ pk ) â†’ pk+1 ] is a tautology, assume that the hypothesis of this conditional statement is true. Because both the hypothesis and P (k) are true, it follows that (p1 âˆ§ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆ§ pkâˆ’1 ) â†’ pk is true. Because this is true, and because pk â†’ pk+1 is true (it is part of the assumption) it follows by hypothetical syllogism that (p1 âˆ§ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆ§ pkâˆ’1 ) â†’ pk+1 is true. The weaker statement (p1 âˆ§ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆ§ pkâˆ’1 âˆ§ pk ) â†’ pk+1 follows from this. 63. We will first prove the result when n is a power of 2, that is, if n = 2k , k = 1, 2, . . . . Let P (k) be the statement A â‰Ľ G, where A and G are the arithmetic and geometric means, respectively, of a set of n = 2k positive real numbers. Basis âˆš âˆš step: k = 1 and n = 21 = 2. Note that ( a1 âˆ’ a2 )2 â‰Ľ 0. âˆš Expanding this shows that a1 âˆ’ 2 a1 a2 + a2 â‰Ľ 0, that is, (a1 + a2 )/2 â‰Ľ (a1 a2 )1/2 . Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true, with n = 2k . We will show that P (k + 1) is true. We have 2k+1 = 2n. Now (a1 + a2 + Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ + a2n )/(2n) = [(a1 + a2 + Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ + an )/n + (an+1 + an+2 + Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ + a2n )/n]/2 and similarly (a1 a2 Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ a2n )1/(2n) = [(a1 Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ an )1/n (an+1 Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ a2n )1/n ]1/2 . To simplify the notation, let A(x, y, . . . ) and G(x, y, . . . ) denote the arithmetic mean and geometric mean of x, y, . . . , respectively. Also, if x â‰¤ x , y â‰¤ y , and so on, then A(x, y, . . . ) â‰¤ A(x , y , . . . ) and G(x, y, . . . ) â‰¤ G(x , y , . . . ). Hence, A(a1 , . . . , a2n ) = A(A(a1 , . . . , an ), A(an+1 , . . . , a2n )) â‰Ľ A(G(a1 , . . . , an ), G(an+1 , . . . , a2n )) â‰Ľ G(G(a1 , . . . , an ), G(an+1 , . . . , a2n )) = G(a1 , . . . , a2n ). This finishes the proof for powers of 2. Now if n is not a power of 2, let m be the next higher power of 2, and let an+1 , . . . , am all equal A(a1 , . . . , an ) = a. Then we have [(a1 a2 Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ an )a mâˆ’n ]1/m â‰¤ A(a1 , . . . , am ), because m is a power of 2. Because A(a1 , . . . , am ) = a, it follows that (a1 Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ an )1/m a 1âˆ’n/m â‰¤ a n/m . Raising both sides to the (m/n)th power gives G(a1 , . . . , an ) â‰¤ A(a1 , . . . , an ). 65. Basis step: For n = 1, the left-hand side is just 11 , which is 1. For n = 2, there are three nonempty subsets {1}, {2}, 1 = 2. Inductive and {1, 2}, so the left-hand side is 11 + 21 + 1Âˇ2 step: Assume that the statement is true for k. The set of the first k + 1 positive integers has many nonempty subsets, but they fall into three categories: a nonempty subset of the first k positive integers together with k + 1, a nonempty subset of the first k positive integers, or just {k + 1}. By the inductive hypothesis, the sum of the first category is k. For the second category, we can factor out 1/(k + 1) from each term of the sum and what remains is just k by the inductive hypothesis, so this part of the sum is k/(k + 1). Finally, the third category simply yields 1/(k + 1). Hence, the entire summation is k + k/(k + 1) + 1/(k + 1) = k + 1. 67. Basis step: If A1 âŠ† A2 , then A1 satisfies the condition of being a subset of each set in the collection; otherwise A2 âŠ† A1 , so A2 satisfies the condition. Inductive step: Assume the inductive hypothesis, that the conditional statement is true for k sets,

and suppose we are given k + 1 sets that satisfy the given conditions. By the inductive hypothesis, there must be a set Ai for some i â‰¤ k such that Ai âŠ† Aj for 1 â‰¤ j â‰¤ k. If Ai âŠ† Ak+1 , then we are done. Otherwise, we know that Ak+1 âŠ† Ai , and this tells us that Ak+1 satisfies the condition of being a subset of Aj for 1 â‰¤ j â‰¤ k + 1. 69. G(1) = 0, G(2) = 1, G(3) = 3, G(4) = 4 71. To show that 2n âˆ’ 4 calls are sufficient to exchange all the gossip, select persons 1, 2, 3, and 4 to be the central committee. Every person outside the central committee calls one person on the central committee. At this point the central committee members as a group know all the scandals. They then exchange information among themselves by making the calls 1-2, 3-4, 1-3, and 2-4 in that order. At this point, every central committee member knows all the scandals. Finally, again every person outside the central committee calls one person on the central committee, at which point everyone knows all the scandals. [The total number of calls is (n âˆ’ 4) + 4 + (n âˆ’ 4) = 2n âˆ’ 4.] That this cannot be done with fewer than 2n âˆ’ 4 calls is much harder to prove; see Sandra M. Hedetniemi, Stephen T. Hedetniemi, and Arthur L. Liestman, â€œA survey of gossiping and broadcasting in communication networks,â€? Networks 18 (1988), no. 4, 319â€“349, for details. 73. We prove this by mathematical induction. The basis step (n = 2) is true tautologically. For n = 3, suppose that the intervals are (a, b), (c, d), and (e, f ), where without loss of generality we can assume that a â‰¤ c â‰¤ e. Because (a, b)âˆŠ(e, f ) = âˆ…, we must have e < b; for a similar reason, e < d. It follows that the number halfway between e and the smaller of b and d is common to all three intervals. Now for the inductive step, assume that whenever we have k intervals that have pairwise nonempty intersections then there is a point common to all the intervals, and suppose that we are given intervals I1 , I2 , . . . , Ik+1 that have pairwise nonempty intersections. For each i from 1 to k, let Ji = Ii âˆŠ Ik+1 . We claim that the collection J1 , J2 , . . . , Jk satisfies the inductive hypothesis, that is, that Ji1 âˆŠ Ji2 = âˆ… for each choice of subscripts i1 and i2 . This follows from the n = 3 case proved above, using the sets Ii1 , Ii2 , and Ik+1 . We can now invoke the inductive hypothesis to conclude that there is a number common to all of the sets Ji for i = 1, 2, . . . , k, which perforce is in the intersection of all the sets Ii for i = 1, 2, . . . , k + 1. 75. Pair up the people. Have the people stand at mutually distinct small distances from their partners but far away from everyone else. Then each person throws a pie at his or her partner, so everyone gets hit. 77.

79. Let P (n) be the statement that every 2n Ă—2n Ă—2n checkerboard with a 1 Ă— 1 Ă— 1 cube removed can be covered by tiles

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-32

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

that are 2 × 2 × 2 cubes each with a 1 × 1 × 1 cube removed. The basis step, P (1), holds because one tile coincides with the solid to be tiled. Now assume that P (k) holds. Now consider a 2k+1 × 2k+1 × 2k+1 cube with a 1 × 1 × 1 cube removed. Split this object into eight pieces using planes parallel to its faces and running through its center. The missing 1 × 1 × 1 piece occurs in one of these eight pieces. Now position one tile with its center at the center of the large object so that the missing 1 × 1 × 1 cube lies in the octant in which the large object is missing a 1×1×1 cube. This creates eight 2k ×2k ×2k cubes, each missing a 1 × 1 × 1 cube. By the inductive hypothesis we can fill each of these eight objects with tiles. Putting these tilings together produces the desired tiling. 81.

83. Let Q(n) be P (n + b − 1). The statement that P (n) is true for n = b, b + 1, b + 2, . . . is the same as the statement that Q(m) is true for all positive integers m. We are given that P (b) is true [i.e., that Q(1) is true], and that P (k) → P (k + 1) for all k ≥ b [i.e., that Q(m) → Q(m + 1) for all positive integers m]. Therefore, by the principle of mathematical induction, Q(m) is true for all positive integers m.

Section 5.2 1. Basis step: We are told we can run one mile, so P (1) is true. Inductive step: Assume the inductive hypothesis, that we can run any number of miles from 1 to k. We must show that we can run k + 1 miles. If k = 1, then we are already told that we can run two miles. If k > 1, then the inductive hypothesis tells us that we can run k − 1 miles, so we can run (k − 1) + 2 = k + 1 miles. 3. a) P (8) is true, because we can form 8 cents of postage with one 3-cent stamp and one 5-cent stamp. P (9) is true, because we can form 9 cents of postage with three 3-cent stamps. P (10) is true, because we can form 10 cents of postage with two 5-cent stamps. b) The statement that using just 3-cent and 5-cent stamps we can form j cents postage for all j with 8 ≤ j ≤ k, where we assume that k ≥ 10 c) Assuming the inductive hypothesis, we can form k + 1 cents postage using just 3-cent and 5-cent stamps d) Because k ≥ 10, we know that P (k − 2) is true, that is, that we can form k −2 cents of postage. Put one more 3-cent stamp on the envelope, and we have formed k + 1 cents of postage. e) We have completed both the basis step and the inductive step, so by the principle of strong induction, the statement is true for every integer n greater than or equal to 8. 5. a) 4, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, and all values greater than or equal to 30 b) Let P (n) be the statement that

we can form n cents of postage using just 4-cent and 11-cent stamps. We want to prove that P (n) is true for all n ≥ 30. For the basis step, 30 = 11 + 11 + 4 + 4. Assume that we can form k cents of postage (the inductive hypothesis); we will show how to form k + 1 cents of postage. If the k cents included an 11-cent stamp, then replace it by three 4cent stamps. Otherwise, k cents was formed from just 4-cent stamps. Because k ≥ 30, there must be at least eight 4-cent stamps involved. Replace eight 4-cent stamps by three 11-cent stamps, and we have formed k + 1 cents in postage. c) P (n) is the same as in part (b). To prove that P (n) is true for all n ≥ 30, we check for the basis step that 30 = 11 + 11 + 4 + 4, 31 = 11+4+4+4+4+4, 32 = 4+4+4+4+4+4+4+4, and 33 = 11 + 11 + 11. For the inductive step, assume the inductive hypothesis, that P (j ) is true for all j with 30 ≤ j ≤ k, where k is an arbitrary integer greater than or equal to 33. We want to show that P (k + 1) is true. Because k − 3 ≥ 30, we know that P (k − 3) is true, that is, that we can form k − 3 cents of postage. Put one more 4-cent stamp on the envelope, and we have formed k + 1 cents of postage. In this proof, our inductive hypothesis was that P (j ) was true for all values of j between 30 and k inclusive, rather than just that P (30) was true. 7. We can form all amounts except $1 and $3. Let P (n) be the statement that we can form n dollars using just 2-dollar and 5-dollar bills. We want to prove that P (n) is true for all n ≥ 5. (It is clear that $1 and $3 cannot be formed and that $2 and $4 can be formed.) For the basis step, note that 5 = 5 and 6 = 2+2+2. Assume the inductive hypothesis, that P (j ) is true for all j with 5 ≤ j ≤ k, where k is an arbitrary integer greater than or equal to 6. We want to show that P (k + 1) is true. Because k − 1 ≥ 5, we know that P (k − 1) is true, that is, that we can form k − 1 dollars. Add another 2-dollar bill, and we have formed k + 1 dollars. 9. Let P (n)√be the statement that there is no positive integer √ b such that 2 = n/b. Basis step: P (1) is true because 2 > 1 ≥ 1/b for all positive integers b. Inductive step: Assume that P (j ) is true for all j ≤ k, where k is an arbitrary positive integer; √we prove that P (k +1) is true by contradiction. Assume that 2 = (k +1)/b for some positive integer b. Then 2b2 = (k + 1)2 , so (k + 1)2 is even, and hence, k + 1 is even. So write k + 1 = 2t for some positive integer t, whence 2b2 = 4t 2 and b2 = 2t 2 . By the same reasoning as before, b is even, so b = 2s for some √ positive integer s. Then 2 = (k + 1)/b = (2t)/(2s) = t/s. But t ≤ k, so this contradicts the inductive hypothesis, and our proof of the inductive step is complete. 11. Basis step: There are four base cases. If n = 1 = 4 · 0 + 1, then clearly the second player wins. If there are two, three, or four matches (n = 4·0+2, n = 4·0+3, or n = 4·1), then the first player can win by removing all but one match. Inductive step: Assume the strong inductive hypothesis, that in games with k or fewer matches, the first player can win if k ≡ 0, 2, or 3 (mod 4) and the second player can win if k ≡ 1 (mod 4). Suppose we have a game with k + 1 matches, with k ≥ 4. If k + 1 ≡ 0 (mod 4), then the first player can remove three matches, leaving k − 2 matches for the other player. Because k − 2 ≡ 1 (mod 4), by the inductive hypothesis, this is a game that the second player

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-33

at that point (who is the first player in our game) can win. Similarly, if k + 1 ≡ 2 (mod 4), then the first player can remove one match; and if k + 1 ≡ 3 (mod 4), then the first player can remove two matches. Finally, if k + 1 ≡ 1 (mod 4), then the first player must leave k, k − 1, or k − 2 matches for the other player. Because k ≡ 0 (mod 4), k − 1 ≡ 3 (mod 4), and k − 2 ≡ 2 (mod 4), by the inductive hypothesis, this is a game that the first player at that point (who is the second player in our game) can win. 13. Let P (n) be the statement that exactly n − 1 moves are required to assemble a puzzle with n pieces. Now P (1) is trivially true. Assume that P (j ) is true for all j ≤ k, and consider a puzzle with k + 1 pieces. The final move must be the joining of two blocks, of size j and k + 1 − j for some integer j with 1 ≤ j ≤ k. By the inductive hypothesis, it required j − 1 moves to construct the one block, and k + 1 − j − 1 = k − j moves to construct the other. Therefore, 1 + (j − 1) + (k − j ) = k moves are required in all, so P (k + 1) is true. 15. Let the Chomp board have n rows and n columns. We claim that the first player can win the game by making the first move to leave just the top row and leftmost column. Let P (n) be the statement that if a player has presented his opponent with a Chomp configuration consisting of just n cookies in the top row and n cookies in the leftmost column, then he can win the game. We will prove ∀nP (n) by strong induction. We know that P (1) is true, because the opponent is forced to take the poisoned cookie at his first turn. Fix k ≥ 1 and assume that P (j ) is true for all j ≤ k. We claim that P (k + 1) is true. It is the opponent’s turn to move. If she picks the poisoned cookie, then the game is over and she loses. Otherwise, assume she picks the cookie in the top row in column j , or the cookie in the left column in row j , for some j with 2 ≤ j ≤ k + 1. The first player now picks the cookie in the left column in row j , or the cookie in the top row in column j , respectively. This leaves the position covered by P (j − 1) for his opponent, so by the inductive hypothesis, he can win. 17. Let P (n) be the statement that if a simple polygon with n sides is triangulated, then at least two of the triangles in the triangulation have two sides that border the exterior of the polygon. We will prove ∀n ≥ 4 P (n). The statement is clearly true for n = 4, because there is only one diagonal, leaving two triangles with the desired property. Fix k ≥ 4 and assume that P (j ) is true for all j with 4 ≤ j ≤ k. Consider a polygon with k + 1 sides, and some triangulation of it. Pick one of the diagonals in this triangulation. First suppose that this diagonal divides the polygon into one triangle and one polygon with k sides. Then the triangle has two sides that border the exterior. Furthermore, the k-gon has, by the inductive hypothesis, two triangles that have two sides that border the exterior of that k-gon, and only one of these triangles can fail to be a triangle that has two sides that border the exterior of the original polygon. The only other case is that this diagonal divides the polygon into two polygons with j sides and k + 3 − j sides for some j with 4 ≤ j ≤ k − 1. By the inductive hypothesis, each of these two polygons has two triangles that have two sides that border their exterior, and in each case only one of these triangles can fail to be a trian-

gle that has two sides that border the exterior of the original polygon. 19. Let P (n) be the statement that the area of a simple polygon with n sides and vertices all at lattice points is given by I (P ) + B(P )/2 − 1. We will prove P (n) for all n ≥ 3. We begin with an additivity lemma: If P is a simple polygon with all vertices at lattice points, divided into polygons P1 and P2 by a diagonal, then I (P ) + B(P )/2 − 1 = [I (P1 ) + B(P1 )/2 − 1] + [I (P2 ) + B(P2 )/2 − 1]. To prove this, suppose there are k lattice points on the diagonal, not counting its endpoints. Then I (P ) = I (P1 ) + I (P2 ) + k and B(P ) = B(P1 ) + B(P2 ) − 2k − 2; and the result follows by simple algebra. What this says in particular is that if Pick’s formula gives the correct area for P1 and P2 , then it must give the correct formula for P , whose area is the sum of the areas for P1 and P2 ; and similarly if Pick’s formula gives the correct area for P and one of the Pi ’s, then it must give the correct formula for the other Pi . Next we prove the theorem for rectangles whose sides are parallel to the coordinate axes. Such a rectangle necessarily has vertices at (a, b), (a, c), (d, b), and (d, c), where a, b, c, and d are integers with b < c and a < d. Its area is (c − b)(d − a). Also, B = 2(c − b + d − a) and I = (c−b−1)(d−a−1) = (c−b)(d−a)−(c−b)−(d−a)+1. Therefore, I + B/2 − 1 = (c − b)(d − a) − (c − b) − (d − a) + 1 + (c − b + d − a) − 1 = (c − b)(d − a), which is the desired area. Next consider a right triangle whose legs are parallel to the coordinate axes. This triangle is half a rectangle of the type just considered, for which Pick’s formula holds, so by the additivity lemma, it holds for the triangle as well. (The values of B and I are the same for each of the two triangles, so if Picks’s formula gave an answer that was either too small or too large, then it would give a correspondingly wrong answer for the rectangle.) For the next step, consider an arbitrary triangle with vertices at lattice points that is not of the type already considered. Embed it in as small a rectangle as possible. There are several possible ways this can happen, but in any case (and adding one more edge in one case), the rectangle will have been partitioned into the given triangle and two or three right triangles with sides parallel to the coordinate axes. Again by the additivity lemma, we are guaranteed that Pick’s formula gives the correct area for the given triangle. This completes the proof of P (3), the basis step in our strong induction proof. For the inductive step, given an arbitrary polygon, use Lemma 1 in the text to split it into two polygons. Then by the additivity lemma above and the inductive hypothesis, we know that Pick’s formula gives the correct area for this polygon. 21. a) In the left figure ∠abp is smallest, but bp is not an interior diagonal. b) In the right figure bd is not an interior diagonal. c) In the right figure bd is not an interior diagonal. 23. a) When we try to prove the inductive step and find a triangle in each subpolygon with at least two sides bordering the exterior, it may happen in each case that the triangle we are guaranteed in fact borders the diagonal (which is part of the boundary of that polygon). This leaves us with no triangles guaranteed to touch the boundary of the original polygon. b) We proved the stronger statement ∀n ≥ 4 T (n) in Exercise 17. 25. a) The inductive step here allows us to conclude that

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-34

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

P (3), P (5), . . . are all true, but we can conclude nothing about P (2), P (4), . . . . b) P (n) is true for all positive integers n, using strong induction. c) The inductive step here enables us to conclude that P (2), P (4), P (8), P (16), â€Śare all true, but we can conclude nothing about P (n) when n is not a power of 2. d) This is mathematical induction; we can conclude that P (n) is true for all positive integers n. 27. Suppose, for a proof by contradiction, that there is some positive integer n such that P (n) is not true. Let m be the smallest positive integer greater than n for which P (m) is true; we know that such an m exists because P (m) is true for infinitely many values of m. But we know that P (m) â†’ P (m âˆ’ 1), so P (m âˆ’ 1) is also true. Thus, m âˆ’ 1 cannot be greater than n, so m âˆ’ 1 = n and P (n) is in fact true. This contradiction shows that P (n) is true for all n. 29. The error is in going from the base case n = 0 to the next case, n = 1; we cannot write 1 as the sum of two smaller natural numbers. 31. Assume that the well-ordering property holds. Suppose that P (1) is true and that the conditional statement [P (1) âˆ§ P (2) âˆ§ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆ§ P (n)] â†’ P (n + 1) is true for every positive integer n. Let S be the set of positive integers n for which P (n) is false. We will show S = âˆ…. Assume that S = âˆ…. Then by the well-ordering property there is a least integer m in S. We know that m cannot be 1 because P (1) is true. Because n = m is the least integer such that P (n) is false, P (1), P (2), . . . , P (m âˆ’ 1) are true, and m âˆ’ 1 â‰Ľ 1. Because [P (1) âˆ§ P (2) âˆ§ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆ§ P (m âˆ’ 1)] â†’ P (m) is true, it follows that P (m) must also be true, which is a contradiction. Hence, S = âˆ…. 33. In each case, give a proof by contradiction based on a â€œsmallest counterexample,â€? that is, values of n and k such that P (n, k) is not true and n and k are smallest in some sense. a) Choose a counterexample with n + k as small as possible. We cannot have n = 1 and k = 1, because we are given that P (1, 1) is true. Therefore, either n > 1 or k > 1. In the former case, by our choice of counterexample, we know that P (n âˆ’ 1, k) is true. But the inductive step then forces P (n, k) to be true, a contradiction.The latter case is similar. So our supposition that there is a counterexample mest be wrong, and P (n, k) is true in all cases. b) Choose a counterexample with n as small as possible. We cannot have n = 1, because we are given that P (1, k) is true for all k. Therefore, n > 1. By our choice of counterexample, we know that P (n âˆ’ 1, k) is true. But the inductive step then forces P (n, k) to be true, a contradiction. c) Choose a counterexample with k as small as possible. We cannot have k = 1, because we are given that P (n, 1) is true for all n. Therefore, k > 1. By our choice of counterexample, we know that P (n, k âˆ’ 1) is true. But the inductive step then forces P (n, k) to be true, a contradiction. 35. Let P (n) be the statement that if x1 , x2 , . . . , xn are n distinct real numbers, then n âˆ’ 1 multiplications are used to find the product of these numbers no matter how parentheses are inserted in the product. We will prove that P (n) is true using strong induction. The basis case P (1) is true because 1âˆ’1 = 0 multiplications are required to find the product of x1 , a product with only one factor. Suppose that P (k) is true for 1 â‰¤ k â‰¤ n. The last multiplication used to find the product of the n + 1 distinct real numbers x1 , x2 , . . . , xn , xn+1 is a multiplication

of the product of the first k of these numbers for some k and the product of the last n + 1 âˆ’ k of them. By the inductive hypothesis, k âˆ’ 1 multiplications are used to find the product of k of the numbers, no matter how parentheses were inserted in the product of these numbers, and n âˆ’ k multiplications are used to find the product of the other n + 1 âˆ’ k of them, no matter how parentheses were inserted in the product of these numbers. Because one more multiplication is required to find the product of all n + 1 numbers, the total number of multiplications used equals (k âˆ’ 1) + (n âˆ’ k) + 1 = n. Hence, P (n + 1) is true. 37. Assume that a = dq + r = dq + r with 0 â‰¤ r < d and 0 â‰¤ r < d. Then d(q âˆ’ q ) = r âˆ’ r. It follows that d divides r âˆ’ r. Because âˆ’d < r âˆ’ r < d, we have r âˆ’ r = 0. Hence, r = r. It follows that q = q . 39. This is a paradox caused by self-reference. The answer is clearly â€œno.â€? There are a finite number of English words, so only a finite number of strings of 15 words or fewer; therefore, only a finite number of positive integers can be so described, not all of them. 41. Suppose that the well-ordering property were false. Let S be a nonempty set of nonnegative integers that has no least element. Let P (n) be the statement â€œi âˆˆ S for i = 0, 1, . . . , n.â€? P (0) is true because if 0 âˆˆ S then S has a least element, namely, 0. Now suppose that P (n) is true. Thus, 0 âˆˆ S, 1 âˆˆ S, . . . , n âˆˆ S. Clearly, n + 1 cannot be in S, for if it were, it would be its least element. Thus P (n+1) is true. So by the principle of mathematical induction, n âˆˆ S for all nonnegative integers n. Thus, S = âˆ…, a contradiction. 43. Strong induction implies the principle of mathematical induction, for if one has shown that P (k) â†’ P (k + 1) is true, then one has also shown that [P (1)âˆ§Âˇ Âˇ Âˇâˆ§P (k)] â†’ P (k+1) is true. By Exercise 41, the principle of mathematical induction implies the well-ordering property. Therefore by assuming strong induction as an axiom, we can prove the well-ordering property.

Section 5.3 1. a) f (1) = 3, f (2) = 5, f (3) = 7, f (4) = 9 b) f (1) = 3, f (2) = 9, f (3) = 27, f (4) = 81 c) f (1) = 2, f (2) = 4, f (3) = 16, f (4) = 65,536 d) f (1) = 3, f (2) = 13, f (3) = 183, f (4) = 33,673 3. a) f (2) = âˆ’1, f (3) = 5, f (4) = 2, f (5) = 17 b) f (2) = âˆ’4, f (3) = 32, f (4) = âˆ’4096, f (5) = 536,870,912 c) f (2) = 8, f (3) = 176, f (4) =92,672, f (5) = 25,764, 174, 848 d) f (2) = âˆ’ 21 , f (3) = âˆ’4, f (4) = 18 , f (5) = âˆ’32 5. a) Not valid b) f (n) = 1 âˆ’ n. Basis step: f (0) = 1 = 1 âˆ’ 0. Inductive step: if f (k) = 1 âˆ’ k, then f (k + 1) = f (k) âˆ’ 1 = 1 âˆ’ k âˆ’ 1 = 1âˆ’ (k + 1). c) f (n) = 4 âˆ’ n if n > 0, and f (0) = 2. Basis step: f (0) = 2 and f (1) = 3 = 4 âˆ’ 1. Inductive step (with k â‰Ľ 1): f (k + 1) = f (k) âˆ’ 1 = (4 âˆ’ k) âˆ’ 1 = 4 âˆ’ (k + 1). d) f (n) = 2(n+1)/2 . Basis step: f (0) = 1 = 2(0+1)/2 and f (1) = 2 = 2(1+1)/2 . Inductive step (with k â‰Ľ 1): f (k+1) = 2f (kâˆ’1) = 2Âˇ2k/2 = 2k/2+1 = 2((k+1)+1)/2 . e) f (n) = 3n . Basis step: Trivial. Inductive step: For odd n, f (n) = 3f (n âˆ’ 1) = 3 Âˇ 3nâˆ’1 = 3n ; and for even n > 1, f (n) = 9f (n âˆ’ 2) = 9 Âˇ 3nâˆ’2 = 3n . 7. There

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-35

are many possible correct answers. We will supply relatively simple ones. a) an+1 = an + 6 for n ≥ 1 and a1 = 6 b) an+1 = an + 2 for n ≥ 1 and a1 = 3 c) an+1 = 10an for n ≥ 1 and a1 = 10 d) an+1 = an for n ≥ 1 and a1 = 5 9. F (0) = 0, F (n) = F (n − 1) + n for n ≥ 1 11. Pm (0) = 0, Pm (n + 1) = Pm (n) + m 13. Let P (n) be “f1 + f3 + · · · + f2n−1 = f2n .” Basis step: P (1) is true because f1 = 1 = f2 . Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true. Then f1 + f3 + · · · + f2k−1 + f2k+1 = f2k + f2k+1 = f2k+2 + f2(k+1) . 15. Basis step: f0 f1 + f1 f2 = 0 · 1 + 1 · 1 = 12 = f22 . Inductive 2. step: Assume that f0 f1 + f1 f2 + · · · + f2k−1 f2k = f2k Then f0 f1 + f1 f2 + · · · + f2k−1 f2k + f2k f2k+1 + 2 + f f f2k+1 f2k+2 = f2k = 2k 2k+1 + f2k+1 f2k+2 f2k (f2k + f2k+1 ) + f2k+1 f2k+2 = f2k f2k+2 + f2k+1 f2k+2 = 2 (f2k + f2k+1 )f2k+2 = f2k+2 . 17. The number of divisions used by the Euclidean algorithm to find gcd(fn+1 , fn ) is 0 for n = 0, 1 for n = 1, and n−1 for n ≥ 2. To prove this result for n ≥ 2 we use mathematical induction. For n = 2, one division shows that gcd(f3 , f2 ) = gcd(2, 1) = gcd(1, 0) = 1. Now assume that k − 1 divisions are used to find gcd(fk+1 , fk ). To find gcd(fk+2 , fk+1 ), first divide fk+2 by fk+1 to obtain fk+2 = 1 · fk+1 + fk . After one div- ision we have gcd(fk+2 , fk+1 ) = gcd(fk+1 , fk ). By the inductive hypothesis it follows that exactly k − 1 more divisions are required. This shows that k divisions are required to find gcd(fk+2 , fk+1 ), finishing the inductive proof. 19. |A| = −1. Hence, |An | = (−1)n . It follows that fn+1 fn−1 − fn2 = (−1)n . 21. a) Proof by induction. Basis step: For n = 1, max(−a1 ) = −a1 = − min(a1 ). For n = 2, there are two cases. If a2 ≥ a1 , then −a1 ≥ −a2 , so max(−a1 , −a2 ) = −a1 = − min(a1 , a2 ). If a2 < a1 , then −a1 < −a2 , so max(−a1 , −a2 ) = −a2 = − min(a1 , a2 ). Inductive step: Assume true for k with k ≥ 2. Then max(−a1 , −a2 , . . . , −ak , −ak+1 ) = max(max(−a1 , . . . , −ak ), −ak+1 ) = max(− min(a1 , . . . , ak ), −ak+1 ) = − min(min(a1 , . . . , ak ), ak+1 ) = − min(a1 , . . . , ak+1 ). b) Proof by mathematical induction. Basis step: For n = 1, the result is the identity a1 + b1 = a1 + b1 . For n = 2, first consider the case in which a1 + b1 ≥ a2 + b2 . Then max(a1 + b1 , a2 + b2 ) = a1 + b1 . Also note that a1 ≤ max(a1 , a2 ) and b1 ≤ max(b1 , b2 ), so a1 + b1 ≤ max(a1 , a2 ) + max(b1 , b2 ). Therefore, max(a1 +b1 , a2 +b2 ) = a1 +b1 ≤ max(a1 , a2 )+max(b1 , b2 ). The case with a1 + b1 < a2 + b2 is similar. Inductive step: Assume that the result is true for k. Then max(a1 + b1 , a2 + b2 , . . . , ak + bk , ak+1 + bk+1 ) = max(max(a1 + b1 , a2 + b2 , . . . , ak + bk ), ak+1 + bk+1 ) ≤ max(max(a1 , a2 , . . . , ak ) + max(b1 , b2 , . . . , bk ), ak+1 + bk+1 ) ≤ max(max(a1 , a2 , . . . , ak ), ak+1 ) + max(max(b1 , b2 , . . . , bk ), bk+1 ) = max(a1 , a2 , . . . , ak , ak+1 ) + max(b1 , b2 , . . . , bk , bk+1 ). c) Same as part (b), but replace every occurrence of “max” by “min” and invert each inequality. 23. 5 ∈ S, and x + y ∈ S if x, y ∈ S. 25. a) 0 ∈ S, and if x ∈ S, then x + 2 ∈ S and x − 2 ∈ S. b) 2 ∈ S, and if x ∈ S, then x + 3 ∈ S.

c) 1 ∈ S, 2 ∈ S, 3 ∈ S, 4 ∈ S, and if x ∈ S, then x + 5 ∈ S. 27. a) (0, 1), (1, 1), (2, 1); (0, 2), (1, 2), (2, 2), (3, 2), (4, 2); (0, 3), (1, 3), (2, 3), (3, 3), (4, 3), (5, 3), (6, 3); (0, 4), (1, 4), (2, 4), (3, 4), (4, 4), (5, 4), (6, 4), (7, 4), (8, 4) b) Let P (n) be the statement that a ≤ 2b whenever (a, b) ∈ S is obtained by n applications of the recursive step. Basis step: P (0) is true, because the only element of S obtained with no applications of the recursive step is (0, 0), and indeed 0 ≤ 2 · 0. Inductive step: Assume that a ≤ 2b whenever (a, b) ∈ S is obtained by k or fewer applications of the recursive step, and consider an element obtained with k + 1 applications of the recursive step. Because the final application of the recursive step to an element (a, b) must be applied to an element obtained with fewer applications of the recursive step, we know that a ≤ 2b. Add 0 ≤ 2, 1 ≤ 2, and 2 ≤ 2, respectively, to obtain a ≤ 2(b + 1), a + 1 ≤ 2(b + 1), and a + 2 ≤ 2(b + 1), as desired. c) This holds for the basis step, because 0 ≤ 0. If this holds for (a, b), then it also holds for the elements obtained from (a, b) in the recursive step, because adding 0 ≤ 2, 1 ≤ 2, and 2 ≤ 2, respectively, to a ≤ 2b yields a ≤ 2(b + 1), a + 1 ≤ 2(b + 1), and a + 2 ≤ 2(b + 1). 29. a) Define S by (1, 1) ∈ S, and if (a, b) ∈ S, then (a + 2, b) ∈ S, (a, b + 2) ∈ S, and (a + 1, b + 1) ∈ S. All elements put in S satisfy the condition, because (1, 1) has an even sum of coordinates, and if (a, b) has an even sum of coordinates, then so do (a + 2, b), (a, b + 2), and (a + 1, b + 1). Conversely, we show by induction on the sum of the coordinates that if a + b is even, then (a, b) ∈ S. If the sum is 2, then (a, b) = (1, 1), and the basis step put (a, b) into S. Otherwise the sum is at least 4, and at least one of (a − 2, b), (a, b − 2), and (a − 1, b − 1) must have positive integer coordinates whose sum is an even number smaller than a + b, and therefore must be in S. Then one application of the recursive step shows that (a, b) ∈ S. b) Define S by (1, 1), (1, 2), and (2, 1) are in S, and if (a, b) ∈ S, then (a + 2, b) and (a, b + 2) are in S. To prove that our definition works, we note first that (1, 1), (1, 2), and (2, 1) all have an odd coordinate, and if (a, b) has an odd coordinate, then so do (a + 2, b) and (a, b + 2). Conversely, we show by induction on the sum of the coordinates that if (a, b) has at least one odd coordinate, then (a, b) ∈ S. If (a, b) = (1, 1) or (a, b) = (1, 2) or (a, b) = (2, 1), then the basis step put (a, b) into S. Otherwise either a or b is at least 3, so at least one of (a − 2, b) and (a, b − 2) must have positive integer coordinates whose sum is smaller than a + b, and therefore must be in S. Then one application of the recursive step shows that (a, b) ∈ S. c) (1, 6) ∈ S and (2, 3) ∈ S, and if (a, b) ∈ S, then (a + 2, b) ∈ S and (a, b + 6) ∈ S. To prove that our definition works, we note first that (1, 6) and (2, 3) satisfy the condition, and if (a, b) satisfies the condition, then so do (a + 2, b) and (a, b + 6). Conversely we show by induction on the sum of the coordinates that if (a, b) satisfies the condition, then (a, b) ∈ S. For sums 5 and 7, the only points are (1, 6), which the basis step put into S, (2, 3), which the basis step put into S, and (4, 3) = (2 + 2, 3), which is in S by one application of the recursive definition. For a sum greater than 7, either a ≥ 3, or

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-36

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

a â‰¤ 2 and b â‰Ľ 9, in which case either (a âˆ’ 2, b) or (a, b âˆ’ 6) must have positive integer coordinates whose sum is smaller than a + b and satisfy the condition for being in S. Then one application of the recursive step shows that (a, b) âˆˆ S. 31. If x is a set or a variable representing a set, then x is a well-formed formula. If x and y are well-formed formulae, then so are x, (x âˆŞ y), (x âˆŠ y), and (x âˆ’ y). 33. a) If x âˆˆ D = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}, then m(x) = x; if s = tx, where t âˆˆ D âˆ— and x âˆˆ D, then m(s) = min(m(s), x). b) Let t = wx, where w âˆˆ D âˆ— and x âˆˆ D. If w = Îť, then m(st) = m(sx) = min(m(s), x) = min(m(s), m(x)) by the recursive step and the basis step of the definition of m. Otherwise, m(st) = m((sw)x) = min(m(sw), x) by the definition of m. Now m(sw) = min(m(s), m(w)) by the inductive hypothesis of the structural induction, so m(st) = min(min(m(s), m(w)), x) = min(m(s), min(m(w), x)) by the meaning of min. But min(m(w), x) = m(wx) = m(t) by the recursive step of the definition of m. Thus, m(st) = min(m(s), m(t)). 35. ÎťR = Îť and (ux)R = xuR for x âˆˆ , u âˆˆ âˆ— . 37. w0 = Îť and wn+1 = wwn . 39. When the string consists of n 0s followed by n 1s for some non- negative integer n 41. Let P (i) be â€œl(wi ) = i Âˇ l(w).â€? P (0) is true because l(w0 ) = 0 = 0 Âˇ l(w). Assume P (i) is true. Then l(wi+1 ) = l(wwi ) = l(w) + l(wi ) = l(w) + i Âˇ l(w) = (i + 1) Âˇ l(w). 43. Basis step: For the full binary tree consisting of just a root the result is true because n(T ) = 1 and h(T ) = 0, and 1 â‰Ľ 2 Âˇ 0 + 1. Inductive step: Assume that n(T1 ) â‰Ľ 2h(T1 ) + 1 and n(T2 ) â‰Ľ 2h(T2 ) + 1. By the recursive definitions of n(T ) and h(T ), we have n(T ) = 1+n(T1 )+n(T2 ) and h(T ) = 1+max(h(T1 ), h(T2 )). Therefore n(T ) = 1 + n(T1 ) + n(T2 ) â‰Ľ 1 + 2h(T1 ) + 1 + 2h(T2 ) + 1 â‰Ľ 1 + 2 Âˇ max(h(T1 ), h(T2 )) + 2 = 1 + 2(max(h(T1 ), h(T2 )) + 1) = 1 + 2h(T ). 45. Basis step: a0,0 = 0 = 0 + 0. Inductive step: Assume that am ,n = m + n whenever (m , n ) is less than (m, n) in the lexicographic ordering of N Ă— N. If n = 0 then am,n = amâˆ’1,n + 1 = m âˆ’ 1 + n + 1 = m + n. If n > 0, then am,n = am,nâˆ’1 + 1 = m + n âˆ’ 1 + 1 = m + n. 47. a) Pm,m = Pm because a number exceeding m cannot be used in a partition of m. b) Because there is only one way to partition 1, namely, 1 = 1, it follows that P1,n = 1. Because there is only one way to partition m into 1s, Pm,1 = 1. When n > m it follows that Pm,n = Pm,m because a number exceeding m cannot be used. Pm,m = 1 + Pm,mâˆ’1 because one extra partition, namely, m = m, arises when m is allowed in the partition. Pm,n = Pm,nâˆ’1 +Pmâˆ’n,n if m > n because a partition of m into integers not exceeding n either does not use any ns and hence, is counted in Pm,nâˆ’1 or else uses an n and a partition of m âˆ’ n, and hence, is counted in Pmâˆ’n,n . c) P5 = 7, P6 = 11 49. Let P (n) be â€œA(n, 2) = 4.â€? Basis step: P (1) is true because A(1, 2) = A(0, A(1, 1)) = A(0, 2) = 2 Âˇ 2 = 4. Inductive step: Assume that P (n) is true, that is, A(n, 2) = 4. Then A(n + 1, 2) = A(n, A(n + 1, 1)) = A(n, 2) = 4. 51. a) 16 b) 65,536 53. Use a double induction argument to prove the stronger statement: A(m, k) > A(m, l) when k > l. Basis step: When m = 0 the statement is true because

k > l implies that A(0, k) = 2k > 2l = A(0, l). Inductive step: Assume that A(m, x) > A(m, y) for all nonnegative integers x and y with x > y. We will show that this implies that A(m + 1, k) > A(m + 1, l) if k > l. Basis steps: When l = 0 and k > 0, A(m + 1, l) = 0 and either A(m + 1, k) = 2 or A(m + 1, k) = A(m, A(m + 1, k âˆ’ 1)). If m = 0, this is 2A(1, k âˆ’ 1) = 2k . If m > 0, this is greater than 0 by the inductive hypothesis. In all cases, A(m + 1, k) > 0, and in fact, A(m + 1, k) â‰Ľ 2. If l = 1 and k > 1, then A(m + 1, l) = 2 and A(m + 1, k) = A(m, A(m + 1, k âˆ’ 1)), with A(m + 1, k âˆ’ 1) â‰Ľ 2. Hence, by the inductive hypothesis, A(m, A(m + 1, k âˆ’ 1)) â‰Ľ A(m, 2) > A(m, 1) = 2. Inductive step: Assume that A(m + 1, r) > A(m + 1, s) for all r > s, s = 0, 1, . . . , l. Then if k + 1 > l + 1 it follows that A(m+1, k+1) = A(m, A(m+1, k)) > A(m, A(m+1, k)) = A(m + 1, l + 1). 55. From Exercise 54 it follows that A(i, j ) â‰Ľ A(i âˆ’ 1, j ) â‰Ľ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ â‰Ľ A(0, j ) = 2j â‰Ľ j . 57. Let P (n) be â€œF (n) is well-defined.â€? Then P (0) is true because F (0) is specified. Assume that P (k) is true for all k < n. Then F (n) is well-defined at n because F (n) is given in terms of F (0), F (1), . . . , F (n âˆ’ 1). So P (n) is true for all integers n. 59. a) The value of F (1) is ambiguous. b) F (2) is not defined because F (0) is not defined. c) F (3) is ambiguous and F (4) is not defined because F ( 43 ) makes no sense. d) The definition of F (1) is ambiguous because both the second and third clause seem to apply. e) F (2) cannot be computed because trying to compute F (2) gives F (2) = 1 + F (F (1)) = 1 + F (2). 61. a) 1 b) 2 c) 3 d) 3 e) 4 f) 4 g) 5 63. f0âˆ— (n) = n/a 65. f2âˆ— (n) = log log n for n â‰Ľ 2, f2âˆ— (1) = 0

Section 5.4 1. First, we use the recursive step to write 5! = 5 Âˇ 4!. We then use the recursive step repeatedly to write 4! = 4 Âˇ 3!, 3! = 3 Âˇ 2!, 2! = 2 Âˇ 1!, and 1! = 1 Âˇ 0!. Inserting the value of 0! = 1, and working back through the steps, we see that 1! = 1 Âˇ 1 = 1, 2! = 2 Âˇ 1! = 2 Âˇ 1 = 2, 3! = 3 Âˇ 2! = 3 Âˇ 2 = 6, 4! = 4 Âˇ 3! = 4 Âˇ 6 = 24, and 5! = 5 Âˇ 4! = 5 Âˇ 24 = 120. 3. With this input, the algorithm uses the else clause to find that gcd(8, 13) = gcd(13 mod 8, 8) = gcd(5, 8). It uses this clause again to find that gcd(5, 8) = gcd(8 mod 5, 5) = gcd(3, 5), then to get gcd(3, 5) = gcd(5 mod 3, 3) = gcd(2, 3), then gcd(2, 3) = gcd(3 mod 2, 2) = gcd(1, 2), and once more to get gcd(1, 2) = gcd(2 mod 1, 1) = gcd(0, 1). Finally, to find gcd(0, 1) it uses the first step with a = 0 to find that gcd(0, 1) = 1. Consequently, the algorithm finds that gcd(8, 13) = 1. 5. First, because n = 11 is odd, we use the else clause to see that mpower(3, 11, 5) = (mpower (3, 5, 5)2 mod 5 Âˇ 3 mod 5) mod 5. We next use the else clause again to see that mpower (3, 5, 5) = (mpower (3, 2, 5)2 mod 5 Âˇ 3 mod 5) mod 5. Then we use the else if clause to see that mpower (3, 2, 5) = mpower (3, 1, 5)2 mod 5. Using the else clause again, we have mpower (3, 1, 5) = (mpower (3, 0, 5)2 mod 5 Âˇ 3 mod 5) mod 5. Finally, us-

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-37

ing the if clause, we see that mpower (3, 0, 5) = 1. Working backward it follows that mpower (3, 1, 5) = (12 mod 5 · 3 mod 5) mod 5 = 3, mpower (3, 2, 5) = 32 mod 5 = 4, mpower (3, 5, 5) = (42 mod 5 · 3 mod 5) mod 5 = 3, and finally mpower (3, 11, 5) = (32 mod 5 · 3 mod 5) mod 5 = 2. We conclude that 311 mod 5 = 2. 7. procedure mult(n: positive integer, x: integer) if n = 1 then return x else return x + mult (n − 1, x) 9. procedure sum of odds(n: positive integer) if n = 1 then return 1 else return sum of odds (n − 1) + 2n − 1 11. procedure smallest(a1 , . . . , an : integers) if n = 1 then return a1 else return min(smallest (a1 , . . . , an−1 ), an ) 13. procedure modfactorial(n, m: positive integers) if n = 1 then return 1 else return (n · modfactorial(n − 1, m)) mod m 15. procedure gcd(a, b: nonnegative integers) {a < b assumed to hold} if a = 0 then return b else if a = b − a then return a else if a < b − a then return gcd(a, b − a) else return gcd(b − a, a) 17. procedure multiply(x, y: nonnegative integers) if y = 0 then return 0 else if y is even then return 2 · multiply (x, y/2) else return 2 · multiply (x, (y−1)/2) + x 19. We use strong induction on a. Basis step: If a = 0, we know that gcd(0, b) = b for all b > 0, and that is precisely what the if clause does. Inductive step: Fix k > 0, assume the inductive hypothesis—that the algorithm works correctly for all values of its first argument less than k—and consider what happens with input (k, b), where k < b. Because k > 0, the else clause is executed, and the answer is whatever the algorithm gives as output for inputs (b mod k, k). Because b mod k < k, the input pair is valid. By our inductive hypothesis, this output is in fact gcd(b mod k, k), which equals gcd(k, b) by Lemma 1 in Section 4.3. 21. If n = 1, then nx = x, and the algorithm correctly returns x. Assume that the algorithm correctly computes kx. To compute (k + 1)x it recursively computes the product of k + 1 − 1 = k and x, and then adds x. By the inductive hypothesis, it computes that product correctly, so the answer returned is kx +x = (k +1)x, which is correct. 23. procedure square(n: nonnegative integer) if n = 0 then return 0 else return square (n − 1) + 2(n − 1) + 1 Let P (n) be the statement that this algorithm correctly computes n2 . Because 02 = 0, the algorithm works correctly (using the if clause) if the input is 0. Assume that the algorithm works correctly for input k. Then for input k + 1, it

gives as output (because of the else clause) its output when the input is k, plus 2(k + 1 − 1) + 1. By the inductive hypothesis, its output at k is k 2 , so its output at k + 1 is k 2 + 2(k + 1 − 1) + 1 = k 2 + 2k + 1 = (k + 1)2 , as desired. 25. n multiplications versus 2n 27. O(log n) versus n 29. procedure a(n: nonnegative integer) if n = 0 then return 1 else if n = 1 then return 2 else return a(n − 1) · a(n − 2) 31. Iterative 33. procedure iterative(n: nonnegative integer) if n = 0 then z := 1 else if n = 1 then z := 2 else x := 1 y := 2 z := 3 for i := 1 to n − 2 w := x + y + z x := y y := z z := w return z {z is the nth term of the sequence} 35. We first give a recursive procedure and then an iterative procedure. procedure r(n: nonnegative integer) if n < 3 then return 2n + 1 else return r(n − 1) · (r(n − 2))2 · (r(n − 3))3 procedure i(n: nonnegative integer) if n = 0 then z := 1 else if n = 1 then z := 3 else x := 1 y := 3 z := 5 for i := 1 to n − 2 w := z · y 2 · x 3 x := y y := z z := w return z {z is the nth term of the sequence} The iterative version is more efficient. 37. procedure reverse(w: bit string) n := length(w) if n ≤ 1 then return w else return substr(w, n, n)reverse (substr (w, 1, n − 1)) {substr(w, a, b) is the substring of w consisting of the symbols in the ath through bth positions} 39. The procedure correctly gives the reversal of λ as λ (basis step), and because the reversal of a string consists of its last character followed by the reversal of its first n − 1 characters (see Exercise 35 in Section 5.3), the algorithm behaves correctly when n > 0 by the inductive hypothesis. 41. The

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-38

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

algorithm implements the idea of Example 14 in Section 5.1. If n = 1 (basis step), place the one right triomino so that its armpit corresponds to the hole in the 2×2 board. If n > 1, then divide the board into four boards, each of size 2n−1 × 2n−1 , notice which quarter the hole occurs in, position one right triomino at the center of the board with its armpit in the quarter where the missing square is (see Figure 7 in Section 5.1), and invoke the algorithm recursively four times—once on each of the 2n−1 ×2n−1 boards, each of which has one square missing (either because it was missing to begin with, or because it is covered by the central triomino). 43. procedure A(m, n: nonnegative integers) if m = 0 then return 2n else if n = 0 then return 0 else if n = 1 then return 2 else return A(m − 1, A(m, n − 1)) 45. bdafghzpok bdafg

hzpok

bda bd

b

fg a

f

hzp hz

g

d

h

bd

ok p

o

k

z

hz fg

abd

hpz

abdfg

ko

hkopz

abdfghkopz

47. Let the two lists be 1, 2, . . . , m − 1, m + n − 1 and m, m + 1, . . . , m + n − 2, m + n, respectively. 49. If n = 1, then the algorithm does nothing, which is correct because a list with one element is already sorted. Assume that the algorithm works correctly for n = 1 through n = k. If n = k +1, then the list is split into two lists, L1 and L2 . By the inductive hypothesis, mergesort correctly sorts each of these sublists; furthermore, merge correctly merges two sorted lists into one because with each comparison the smallest element in L1 ∪ L2 not yet put into L is put there. 51. O(n) 53. 6 55. O(n2 )

Section 5.5 1. Suppose that x = 0. The program segment first assigns the value 1 to y and then assigns the value x + y = 0 + 1 = 1 to z. 3. Suppose that y = 3. The program segment assigns the value 2 to x and then assigns the value x + y = 2 + 3 = 5 to z.

Because y = 3 > 0 it then assigns the value z + 1 = 5 + 1 = 6 to z. 5. (p∧ condition1){S1 }q (p∧ ¬condition1 ∧ condition2){S2 }q · · · (p∧ ¬condition1 ∧ ¬condition2 · · · ∧ ¬condition(n − 1){Sn }q ∴ p{if condition1 then S1 ; else if condition2 then S2 ; . . . ; else Sn }q 7. We will show that p : “power = x i−1 and i ≤ n + 1” is a loop invariant. Note that p is true initially, because before the loop starts, i = 1 and power = 1 = x 0 = x 1−1 . Next, we must show that if p is true and i ≤ n after an execution of the loop, then p remains true after one more execution. The loop increments i by 1. Hence, because i ≤ n before this pass, i ≤ n + 1 after this pass. Also the loop assigns power · x to power. By the inductive hypothesis we see that power is assigned the value x i−1 · x = x i . Hence, p remains true. Furthermore, the loop terminates after n traversals of the loop with i = n + 1 because i is assigned the value 1 prior to entering the loop, is incremented by 1 on each pass, and the loop terminates when i > n. Consequently, at termination power = x n , as desired. 9. Suppose that p is “m and n are integers.” Then if the condition n < 0 is true, a = −n = |n| after S1 is executed. If the condition n < 0 is false, then a = n = |n| after S1 is executed. Hence, p{S1 }q is true where q is p ∧ (a = |n|). Because S2 assigns the value 0 to both k and x, it is clear that q{S2 }r is true where r is q ∧ (k = 0) ∧ (x = 0). Suppose that r is true. Let P (k) be “x = mk and k ≤ a.” We can show that P (k) is a loop invariant for the loop in S3 . P (0) is true because before the loop is entered x = 0 = m·0 and 0 ≤ a. Now assume P (k) is true and k < a. Then P (k + 1) is true because x is assigned the value x + m = mk + m = m(k + 1). The loop terminates when k = a, and at that point x = ma. Hence, r{S3 }s is true where s is “a = |n| and x = ma.” Now assume that s is true. Then if n < 0 it follows that a = −n, so x = −mn. In this case S4 assigns −x = mn to product. If n > 0 then x = ma = mn, so S4 assigns mn to product. Hence, s{S4 }t is true. 11. Suppose that the initial assertion p is true. Then because p{S}q0 is true, q0 is true after the segment S is executed. Because q0 → q1 is true, it also follows that q1 is true after S is executed. Hence, p{S}q1 is true. 13. We will use the proposition p, “gcd(a, b) = gcd(x, y) and y ≥ 0,” as the loop invariant. Note that p is true before the loop is entered, because at that point x = a, y = b, and y is a positive integer, using the initial assertion. Now assume that p is true and y > 0; then the loop will be executed again. Inside the loop, x and y are replaced by y and x mod y, respectively. By Lemma 1 of Section 4.3, gcd(x, y) = gcd(y, x mod y). Therefore, after execution of the loop, the value of gcd(x, y) is the same as it was before. Moreover, because y is the remainder, it is at least 0. Hence, p remains true, so it is a loop invariant. Furthermore, if the loop terminates, then y = 0. In this case, we have gcd(x, y) = x, the final assertion. Therefore, the program, which gives x as its output, has correctly computed

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-39

gcd(a, b). Finally, we can prove the loop must terminate, because each iteration causes the value of y to decrease by at least 1. Therefore, the loop can be iterated at most b times.

Supplementary Exercises 1. Let P (n) be the statement that this equation holds. Basis step: P (1) says 2/3 = 1 − (1/31 ), which is true. Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true. Then 2/3 + 2/9 + 2/27 + · · · + 2/3n + 2/3n+1 = 1 − 1/3n + 2/3n+1 (by the inductive hypothesis), and this equals 1 − 1/3n+1 , as desired. 3. Let P (n) be “1 · 1 + 2 · 2 + · · · + n · 2n−1 = (n − 1)2n + 1.” Basis step: P (1) is true because 1 · 1 = 1 = (1 − 1)21 + 1. Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true. Then 1 · 1 + 2 · 2 + · · · + k · 2k−1 + (k + 1) · 2k = (k − 1)2k + 1 + (k + 1)2k = 2k · 2k + 1 = [(k + 1) − 1]2k+1 + 1. 5. Let P (n) be “1/(1 · 4) + · · · + 1/[(3n − 2)(3n + 1)] = n/(3n + 1).” Basis step: P (1) is true because 1/(1 · 4) = 1/4. Inductive step: Assume P (k) is true. Then 1/(1 · 4) + · · · + 1/[(3k − 2)(3k + 1)] + 1/[(3k + 1)(3k + 4)] = k/(3k + 1) +1/[(3k + 1)(3k + 4)] = [k(3k + 4) + 1]/[(3k + 1)(3k + 4)] = [(3k + 1)(k + 1)]/[(3k + 1)(3k + 4)] = (k + 1)/(3k + 4). 7. Let P (n) be “2n > n3 .” Basis step: P (10) is true because 1024 > 1000. Inductive step: Assume P (k) is true. Then (k + 1)3 = k 3 + 3k 2 + 3k + 1 ≤ k 3 + 9k 2 ≤ k 3 + k 3 = 2k 3 < 2 · 2k = 2k+1 . 9. Let P (n) be “a − b is a factor of a n − bn .” Basis step: P (1) is trivially true. Assume P (k) is true. Then a k+1 − bk+1 = a k+1 − abk + abk − bk+1 = a(a k − bk ) + bk (a − b). Then because a − b is a factor of a k − bk and a − b is a factor of a − b, it follows that a − b is a factor of a k+1 − bk+1 . 11. Basis step: When n = 1, 6n+1 + 72n−1 = 36 + 7 = 43. Inductive step: Assume the inductive hypothesis, that 43 divides 6n+1 + 72n−1 ; we must show that 43 divides 6n+2 + 72n+1 . We have 6n+2 + 72n+1 = 6 · 6n+1 + 49 · 72n−1 = 6 · 6n+1 + 6 · 72n−1 + 43 · 72n−1 = 6(6n+1 + 72n−1 ) + 43 · 72n−1 . By the inductive hypothesis the first term is divisible by 43, and the second term is clearly divisible by 43; therefore the sum is divisible by 43. 13. Let P (n) be “a + (a + d) + · · · + (a + nd) = (n + 1)(2a + nd)/2.” Basis step: P (1) is true because a + (a + d) = 2a + d = 2(2a + d)/2. Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true. Then a + (a + d) + · · · + (a + kd) + [a + (k + 1)d] = (k + 1)(2a + kd)/2 + a + (k + 1)d = 21 (2ak + 2a + k 2 d + kd + 2a + 2kd + 2d) = 21 (2ak + 4a + k 2 d + 3kd + 2d) = 1 15. Basis step: This is true for 2 (k + 2)[2a + (k + 1)d]. n = 1 because 5/6 = 10/12. Inductive step: Assume that the equation holds for n = k, and consider n = k + 1. Then k+1 k i+4 k+5 i+4 = i=1 i(i+1)(i+2) + (k+1)(k+2)(k+3) = i=1 i(i+1)(i+2) k(3k+7) k+5 2(k+1)(k+2) + (k+1)(k+2)(k+3) (by the inductive hypothesis) k(3k+7) 1 1 = (k+1)(k+2) · ( 2 + k+5 k+3 ) = 2(k+1)(k+2)(k+3) · 1 [k(3k + 7) (k + 3) + 2(k + 5)] = 2(k+1)(k+2)(k+3) · 1 · (3k + 10)(k + (3k 3 +16k 2 + 23k + 10) = 2(k+1)(k+2)(k+3) (k+1)(3(k+1)+7) 1 2 1) = 2(k+2)(k+3) · (3k +10)(k +1) = 2((k+1)+1)((k+1)+2) , as desired. 17. Basis step: The statement is true for n = 1 be-

cause the derivative of g(x) = xex is x · ex + ex = (x + 1)ex by the product rule. Inductive step: Assume that the statement is true for n = k, i.e., the kth derivative is given by g (k) = (x + k)ex . Differentiating by the product rule gives the (k+1)st derivative: g (k+1) = (x +k)ex +ex = [x +(k+1)]ex , as desired. 19. We will use strong induction to show that fn is even if n ≡ 0 (mod 3) and is odd otherwise. Basis step: This follows because f0 = 0 is even and f1 = 1 is odd. Inductive step: Assume that if j ≤ k, then fj is even if j ≡ 0 (mod 3) and is odd otherwise. Now suppose k + 1 ≡ 0 (mod 3). Then fk+1 = fk + fk−1 is even because fk and fk−1 are both odd. If k + 1 ≡ 1 (mod 3), then fk+1 = fk + fk−1 is odd because fk is even and fk−1 is odd. Finally, if k + 1 ≡ 2 (mod 3), then fk+1 = fk + fk−1 is odd because fk is odd and fk−1 is even. 21. Let P (n) be the statement that fk fn +fk+1 fn+1 = fn+k+1 for every nonnegative integer k. Basis step: This consists of showing that P (0) and P (1) both hold. P (0) is true because fk f0 + fk+1 f1 = fk+1 · 0 + fk+1 · 1 = f1 . Because fk f1 + fk+1 f2 = fk + fk+1 = fk+2 , it follows that P (1) is true. Inductive step: Now assume that P (j ) holds. Then, by the inductive hypothesis and the recursive definition of the Fibonacci numbers, it follows that fk+1 fj +1 + fk+2 fj +2 = fk (fj −1 + fj ) + fk+1 (fj + fj +1 ) = (fk fj −1 + fk+1 fj ) + (fk fj + fk+1 fj +1 ) = fj −1+k+1 + fj +k+1 = fj +k+2 . This shows that P (j + 1) is true. 23. Let P (n) be the statement l02 + l12 + · · · + ln2 = ln ln+1 + 2. Basis step: P (0) and P (1) both hold because l02 = 22 = 2 · 1 + 2 = l0 l1 + 2 and l02 + l12 = 22 + 12 = 1 · 3 + 2 = l1 l3 + 2. Inductive step: Assume that P (k) holds. Then by the inductive hypoth2 2 = lk lk+1 + 2 + lk+1 = esis l02 + l12 + · · · + lk2 + lk+1 lk+1 (lk + lk+1 ) + 2 = lk+1 lk+2 + 2. This shows that P (k + 1) holds. 25. Let P (n) be the statement that the identity holds for the integer n. Basis step: P (1) is obviously true. Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true. Then cos((k+1)x)+i sin((k+1)x) = cos(kx+x)+i sin(kx+x) = cos kx cos x − sin kx sin x + i(sin kx cos x + cos kx sin x) = cos x(cos kx + i sin kx)(cos x + i sin x) = (cos x + i sin x)k (cos x + i sin x) = (cos x + i sin x)k+1 . It follows that P (k + 1) is true. 27. Rewrite the right-hand side as 2n+1 (n2 − 2n + 3) − 6. For n = 1 we have 2 = 4 · 2 − 6. Assume that the equation holds for n = k, and consider n = k+1. k 2 j 2 j 2 k+1 = 2k+1 (k 2 − Then k+1 j =1 j 2 + (k + 1) 2 j =1 j 2 = 2 k+1 (by the inductive hypo2k + 3) − 6 + (k + 2k + 1)2 thesis) = 2k+1 (2k 2 + 4) − 6 = 2k+2 (k 2 + 2) − 6 = 2k+2 [(k + 1)2 − 2(k + 1) + 3] − 6. 29. Let P (n) be the statement that this equation holds. Basis step: In P (2) both sides reduce to 1/3. Inductive step: Assume thatP (k) is true. k+1 k 2 2 Then j =1 1/(j − 1) = j =1 1/(j − 1) + 1/[(k + 1)2 − 1] = (k − 1)(3k + 2)/[4k(k + 1)] + 1/[(k + 1)2 − 1] by the inductive hypothesis. This simplifies to (k − 1)(3k + 2)/[4k(k + 1)] + 1/(k 2 + 2k) = (3k 3 + 5k 2 )/[4k(k + 1)(k + 2)] = {[(k +1)−1][3(k +1)+2]}/[4(k +1)(k +2)], which is exactly what P (k +1) asserts. 31. Let P (n) be the assertion that at least n + 1 lines are needed to cover the lattice points in the given triangular region. Basis step: P (0) is true, because

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-40

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

we need at least one line to cover the one point at (0, 0). Inductive step: Assume the inductive hypothesis, that at least k + 1 lines are needed to cover the lattice points with x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0, and x + y ≤ k. Consider the triangle of lattice points defined by x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0, and x + y ≤ k + 1. By way of contradiction, assume that k + 1 lines could cover this set. Then these lines must cover the k + 2 points on the line x + y = k + 1. But only the line x + y = k + 1 itself can cover more than one of these points, because two distinct lines intersect in at most one point. Therefore none of the k + 1 lines that are needed (by the inductive hypothesis) to cover the set of lattice points within the triangle but not on this line can cover more than one of the points on this line, and this leaves at least one point uncovered. Therefore our assumption that k + 1 lines could cover the larger set is wrong, and our proof is complete. 33. Let P (n) be Bk = MAk M−1 . Basis step: Part of the given conditions. Inductive step: Assume the inductive hypothesis. Then Bk+1 = BBk = MAM−1 Bk = MAM−1 MAk M−1 (by the inductive hypothesis) = MAIAk M−1 = MAAk M−1 = MAk+1 M−1 . 35. We prove by mathematical induction the following stronger statement: For every n ≥ 3, we can write n! as the sum of n of its distinct positive divisors, one of which is 1. That is, we can write n! = a1 + a2 + · · · + an , where each ai is a divisor of n!, the divisors are listed in strictly decreasing order, and an = 1. Basis step: 3! = 3 + 2 + 1. Inductive step: Assume that we can write k! as a sum of the desired form, say k! = a1 + a2 + · · · + ak , where each ai is a divisor of n!, the divisors are listed in strictly decreasing order, and an = 1. Consider (k + 1)!. Then we have (k + 1)! = (k + 1)k! = (k + 1)(a1 + a2 + · · · + ak ) = (k + 1)a1 + (k + 1)a2 + · · · + (k + 1)ak = (k + 1)a1 + (k + 1)a2 + · · · + k · ak + ak . Because each ai was a divisor of k!, each (k + 1)ai is a divisor of (k +1)!. Furthermore, k ·ak = k, which is a divisor of (k +1)!, and ak = 1, so the new last summand is again 1. (Notice also that our list of summands is still in strictly decreasing order.) Thus we have written (k +1)! in the desired form. 37. When n = 1 the statement is vacuously true. Assume that the statement is true for n = k, and consider k + 1 people standing in a line, with a woman first and a man last. If the kth person is a woman, then we have that woman standing in front of the man at the end. If the kth person is a man, then the first k people in line satisfy the conditions of the inductive hypothesis for the first k people in line, so again we can conclude that there is a woman directly in front of a man somewhere in the line. 39. Basis step: When n = 1 there is one circle, and we can color the inside blue and the outside red to satisfy the conditions. Inductive step: Assume the inductive hypothesis that if there are k circles, then the regions can be 2-colored such that no regions with a common boundary have the same color, and consider a situation with k + 1 circles. Remove one of the circles, producing a picture with k circles, and invoke the inductive hypothesis to color it in the prescribed manner. Then replace the removed circle and change the color of every region inside this circle. The resulting figure satisfies the condition, because if two regions have a common boundary, then either that boundary involved the new circle, in which

case the regions on either side used to be the same region and now the inside portion is different from the outside, or else the boundary did not involve the new circle, in which case the regions are colored differently because they were colored differently before the new circle was restored. 41. If n = 1 then the equation reads 1 · 1 = 1 · 2/2, which is true. Assume that the equation is true for n and consider it for n + 1. Then n+1 n+1 1 n+1 1 (2j − 1) = nj=1 (2j − 1) j =1 k=j k k=j k + n n 1 1 1 = j =1 (2j − 1) n+1 + [2(n + 1) − 1] · n+1 k=j k + n 2n+1 1 n = (2j − 1) + j =1 j =1 (2j − 1) n+1 n+1 n 1 n(n+1) 2n+1 1 2 + n+1 + = + 2n+1 k=j k n+1 · n 2 n+1 (by the inductive hypothesis) =

2n2 +n(n+1)2 +(4n+2) 2(n+1)

2(n+1)2 +n(n+1)2

=

= (n+1)(n+2) . 43. Let T (n) be the state2 ment that the sequence of towers of 2 is eventually constant modulo n. We use strong induction to prove that T (n) is true for all positive integers n. Basis step: When n = 1 (and n = 2), the sequence of towers of 2 modulo n is the sequence of all 0s. Inductive step: Suppose that k is an integer with k ≥ 2. Suppose that T (j ) is true for 1 ≤ j ≤ k − 1. In the proof of the inductive step we denote the rth term of the sequence modulo n by ar . First suppose k is even. Let k = 2s q where s ≥ 1 and q < k is odd. When j is large enough, aj −2 ≥ s, and for aj −2 such j , aj = 22 is a multiple of 2s . It follows that for sufficiently large j , aj ≡ 0 (mod 2s ). Hence, for large enough i, 2s divides ai+1 − ai . By the inductive hypothesis T (q) is true, so the sequence a1 , a2 , a3 , . . . is eventually constant modulo q. This implies that for large enough i, q divides ai+1 − ai . Because gcd(q, 2s ) = 1 and for sufficiently large i both q and 2s divide ai+1 − ai , k = 2s q divides ai+1 − ai for sufficiently large i. Hence, for sufficiently large i, ai+1 − ai ≡ 0 (mod k). This means that the sequence is eventually constant modulo k. Finally, suppose k is odd. Then gcd(2, k) = 1, so by Euler’s theorem (found in elementary number theory books, such as [Ro10]), we know that 2φ(k) ≡ 1 (mod k). Let r = φ(k). Because r < k, by the inductive hypothesis T (r), the sequence a1 , a2 , a3 , . . . is eventually constant modulo r, say equal to c. Hence for large enough i, for some integer ti , ai = ti r + c. Hence ai+1 = 2ai = 2ti r+c = (2r )ti 2c ≡ 2c (mod k). This shows that a1 , a2 , . . . is eventually constant modulo k. 45. a) 92 b) 91 c) 91 d) 91 e) 91 f) 91 47. The basis step is incorrect because n = 1 for the sum shown. 49. Let P (n) be “the plane is divided into n2 −n+2 regions by n circles if every two of these circles have two common points but no three have a common point.” Basis step: P (1) is true because a circle divides the plane into 2 = 12 − 1 + 2 regions. Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true, that is, k circles with the specified properties divide the plane into k 2 − k + 2 regions. Suppose that a (k + 1)st circle is added. This circle intersects each of the other k circles in two points, so these points of intersection form 2k new arcs, each of which splits an old region. Hence, there are 2k regions split, which shows that there are 2k more regions than there were previously. Hence, k + 1 circles satisfying the specified prop2(n+1)

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-41

erties divide the plane into k 2 âˆ’ k + 2 + 2k = (k 2 + 2k + 1) âˆ’ (k + 1) +âˆš2 = (k + 1)2 âˆ’ (k + âˆš 1) + 2 regions. 51. Suppose 2 were rational. Then 2 = a/b, where âˆš a and b are positive integers. It follows that the set S = {n 2âˆš| n âˆˆ N} âˆŠ N is a nonempty set of positive integers, because b 2 = a belongs to S. Let t be the least element âˆšof S, 2 for which exists by the well-orderingâˆšproperty. Then t = s âˆš some integer s. We have t âˆ’sâˆš= s 2âˆ’s = s( 2âˆ’1), so t âˆ’s is a positive integer because 2 > 1. Hence, âˆš t âˆ’s belongs toâˆšS. This is a contradiction because t âˆ’s = s 2âˆ’s < s. Hence, 2 is irrational. 53. a) Let d = gcd(a1 , a2 , . . . , an ). Then d is a divisor of each ai and so must be a divisor of gcd(anâˆ’1 , an ). Hence, d is a common divisor of a1 , a2 , . . . , anâˆ’2 , and gcd(anâˆ’1 , an ). To show that it is the greatest common divisor of these numbers, suppose that c is a common divisor of them. Then c is a divisor of ai for i = 1, 2, . . . , n âˆ’ 2 and a divisor of gcd(anâˆ’1 , an ), so it is a divisor of anâˆ’1 and an . Hence, c is a common divisor of a1 , a2 , . . . , anâˆ’1 , and an . Hence, it is a divisor of d, the greatest common divisor of a1 , a2 , . . . , an . It follows that d is the greatest common divisor, as claimed. b) If n = 2, apply the Euclidean algorithm. Otherwise, apply the Euclidean algorithm to anâˆ’1 and an , obtaining d = gcd(anâˆ’1 , an ), and then apply the algorithm recursively to a1 , a2 , . . . , anâˆ’2 , d. 55. f (n) = n2 . Let P (n) be â€œf (n) = n2 .â€? Basis step: P (1) is true because f (1) = 1 = 12 , which follows from the definition of f . Inductive step: Assume f (n) = n2 . Then f (n + 1) = f ((n + 1) âˆ’ 1) + 2(n + 1) âˆ’ 1 = f (n) + 2n + 1 = n2 + 2n + 1 = (n + 1)2 . 57. a) Îť, 0, 1, 00, 01, 11, 000, 001, 011, 111, 0000, 0001, 0011, 0111, 1111, 00000, 00001, 00011, 00111, 01111, 11111 b) S = {ÎąÎ˛ | Îą is a string of m 0s and Î˛ is a string of n 1s, m â‰Ľ 0, n â‰Ľ 0} 59. Apply the first recursive step to Îť to get () âˆˆ B. Apply the second recursive step to this string to get ()() âˆˆ B. Apply the first recursive step to this string to get (()()) âˆˆ B. By Exercise 62, (())) is not in B because the number of left parentheses does not equal the number of right parentheses. 61. Îť, (), (()), ()() 63. a) 0 b) âˆ’2 c) 2 d) 0 65. procedure generate(n: nonnegative integer) if n is odd then S := S(n âˆ’ 1) {the S constructed by generate(n âˆ’ 1)} T := T (n âˆ’ 1) {the T constructed by generate(n âˆ’ 1)} else if n = 0 then S := âˆ… T := {Îť} else S := S(n âˆ’ 2) {the S constructed by generate(n âˆ’ 2)} T := T (n âˆ’ 2) {the T constructed by generate(n âˆ’ 2)} T := T âˆŞ {(x)|x âˆˆ T âˆŞ S âˆ§ length(x) = n âˆ’ 2} S := S âˆŞ {xy|x âˆˆ T âˆ§ y âˆˆ T âˆŞ S âˆ§ length(xy) = n} {T âˆŞ S is the set of balanced strings of length at most n} 67. If x â‰¤ y initially, then x := y is not executed, so x â‰¤ y is a true final assertion. If x > y initially, then x := y is executed, so x â‰¤ y is again a true final assertion. 69. procedure zerocount(a1 , a2 , . . . , an : list of integers) if n = 1 then

if a1 = 0 then return 1 else return 0 else if an = 0 then return zerocount (a1 , a2 , . . . , anâˆ’1 ) + 1 else return zerocount (a1 , a2 , . . . , anâˆ’1 ) 71. We will prove that a(n) is a natural number and a(n) â‰¤ n. This is true for the base case n = 0 because a(0) = 0. Now assume that a(nâˆ’1) is a natural number and a(nâˆ’1) â‰¤ nâˆ’1. Then a(a(n âˆ’ 1)) is a applied to a natural number less than or equal to n âˆ’ 1. Hence, a(a(n âˆ’ 1)) is also a natural number minus than or equal to n âˆ’ 1. Therefore, n âˆ’ a(a(n âˆ’ 1)) is n minus some natural number less than or equal to nâˆ’1, which is a natural number less than or equal to n. 73. From Exercise 72, a(n) = (n + 1)Îź and a(n âˆ’ 1) = nÎź. Because Îź < 1, these two values are equal or they differ by 1. First suppose that Îźnâˆ’Îźn < 1âˆ’Îź. This is equivalent to Îź(n+1) < 1+Îźn. If this is true, then Îź(n + 1) = Îźn. On the other hand, if Îźn âˆ’ Îźn â‰Ľ 1 âˆ’ Îź, then Îź(n + 1) â‰Ľ 1 + Îźn, so Îź(n + 1) = Îźn + 1, as desired. 75. f (0) = 1, m(0) = 0; f (1) = 1, m(1) = 0; f (2) = 2, m(2) = 1; f (3) = 2, m(3) = 2; f (4) = 3, m(4) = 2; f (5) = 3, m(5) = 3; f (6) = 4, m(6) = 4; f (7) = 5, m(7) = 4; f (8) = 5, m(8) = 5; f (9) = 6, m(9) = 6 77. The last occurrence of n is in the position for which the total number of 1s, 2s, . . . , ns all together is that position number. But because ak is the number of occurrences of k, this is just nk=1 ak , as desired. Because f (n) is the sum of the first n terms of the sequence, f (f (n)) is the sum of the first f (n) terms of the sequence. But because f (n) is the last term whose value is n, this means that the sum is the sum of all terms of the sequence whose value is at most n. Because there are ak terms of the sequence whose value is k, this sum is nk=1 k Âˇ ak , as desired

CHAPTER 6 Section 6.1 1. a) 5850 b) 343 3. a) 410 b) 510 5. 42 7. 263 8 9. 676 11. 2 13. n + 1 (counting the empty string) 15. 475,255 (counting the empty string) 17. 1,321,368,961 19. a) 729 b) 256 c) 1024 d) 64 21. a) Seven: 56, 63, 70, 77, 84, 91, 98 b) Five: 55, 66, 77, 88, 99 c) One: 77 23. a) 128 b) 450 c) 9 d) 675 e) 450 f) 450 g) 225 h) 75 25. a) 990 b) 500 c) 27 27. 350 29. 52,457,600 31. 20,077,200 33. a) 37,822,859,361 b) 8,204,716,800 c) 40,159,050, 880 d) 12,113,640,000 e) 171,004,205,215 f) 72,043,541,640 g) 6,230,721,635 h) 223,149,655 35. a) 0 b) 120 c) 720 d) 2520 37. a) 2 if n = 1, 2 if n = 2, 0 if n â‰Ľ 3 b) 2nâˆ’2 for n > 1; 1 if n = 1 c) 2(n âˆ’ 1) 39. (n + 1)m 41. If n is even, 2n/2 ; if n is odd, 2(n+1)/2 43. a) 175 b) 248 c) 232 d) 84 45. 60 47. a) 240 b) 480 c) 360 49. 352 51. 147 53. 33 55. a) 9,920,671,339,261,325,541,376 â‰ˆ 9.9 Ă— 1021 b) 6,641,514,961,387,068,437,760 â‰ˆ 6.6 Ă— 1021 c) About 314,000 years 57. 54(6465536 âˆ’ 1)/63

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-42

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

59. 7,104,000,000,000 61. 1610 + 1626 + 1658 63. 666,667 65. 18 67. 17 69. 22 71. Let P (m) be the sum rule for m tasks. For the basis case take m = 2. This is just the sum rule for two tasks. Now assume that P (m) is true. Consider m + 1 tasks, T1 , T2 , . . . ,Tm , Tm+1 , which can be done in n1 , n2 , . . . , nm , nm+1 ways, respectively, such that no two of these tasks can be done at the same time. To do one of these tasks, we can either do one of the first m of these or do task Tm+1 . By the sum rule for two tasks, the number of ways to do this is the sum of the number of ways to do one of the first m tasks, plus nm+1 . By the inductive hypothesis, this is n1 + n2 + · · · + nm + nm+1 , as desired. 73. n(n − 3)/2

Section 6.2 1. Because there are six classes, but only five weekdays, the pigeonhole principle shows that at least two classes must be held on the same day. 3. a) 3 b) 14 5. Because there are four possible remainders when an integer is divided by 4, the pigeonhole principle implies that given five integers, at least two have the same remainder. 7. Let a, a + 1, . . . , a + n − 1 be the integers in the sequence. The integers (a + i) mod n, i = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n − 1, are distinct, because 0 < (a + j ) − (a + k) < n whenever 0 ≤ k < j ≤ n − 1. Because there are n possible values for (a + i) mod n and there are n different integers in the set, each of these values is taken on exactly once. It follows that there is exactly one integer in the sequence that is divisible by n. 9. 4951 11. The midpoint of the segment joining the points (a, b, c) and (d, e, f ) is ((a + d)/2, (b + e)/2, (c + f )/2). It has integer coefficients if and only if a and d have the same parity, b and e have the same parity, and c and f have the same parity. Because there are eight possible triples of parity [such as (even, odd, even)], by the pigeonhole principle at least two of the nine points have the same triple of parities. The midpoint of the segment joining two such points has integer coefficients. 13. a) Group the first eight positive integers into four subsets of two integers each so that the integers of each subset add up to 9: {1, 8}, {2, 7}, {3, 6}, and {4, 5}. If five integers are selected from the first eight positive integers, by the pigeonhole principle at least two of them come from the same subset. Two such integers have a sum of 9, as desired. b) No. Take {1, 2, 3, 4}, for example. 15. 4 17. 21,251 19. a) If there were fewer than 9 freshmen, fewer than 9 sophomores, and fewer than 9 juniors in the class, there would be no more than 8 with each of these three class standings, for a total of at most 24 students, contradicting the fact that there are 25 students in the class. b) If there were fewer than 3 freshmen, fewer than 19 sophomores, and fewer than 5 juniors, then there would be at most 2 freshmen, at most 18 sophomores, and at most 4 juniors, for a total of at most 24 students. This contradicts the fact that there are 25 students in the class. 21. 4, 3, 2, 1, 8, 7, 6, 5, 12, 11, 10, 9, 16, 15, 14, 13 23. Number the seats around the table from 1 to 50, and think of seat 50 as being adjacent to seat 1. There are 25 seats with odd numbers and 25 seats with even numbers. If no more than 12 boys occupied the odd-numbered

seats, then at least 13 boys would occupy the even-numbered seats, and vice versa. Without loss of generality, assume that at least 13 boys occupy the 25 odd-numbered seats. Then at least two of those boys must be in consecutive odd-numbered seats, and the person sitting between them will have boys as both of his or her neighbors. 25. procedure long(a1 , . . . , an : positive integers) {first find longest increasing subsequence} max := 0; set := 00 . . . 00 {n bits} for i := 1 to 2n last := 0; count := 0, OK := true for j := 1 to n if set(j ) = 1 then if aj > last then last := aj count := count + 1 else OK := false if count > max then max := count best := set set := set + 1 (binary addition) {max is length and best indicates the sequence} {repeat for decreasing subsequence with only changes being aj < last instead of aj > last and last := ∞ instead of last := 0} 27. By symmetry we need prove only the first statement. Let A be one of the people. Either A has at least four friends, or A has at least six enemies among the other nine people (because 3 + 5 < 9). Suppose, in the first case, that B, C, D, and E are all A’s friends. If any two of these are friends with each other, then we have found three mutual friends. Otherwise {B, C, D, E} is a set of four mutual enemies. In the second case, let {B, C, D, E, F, G} be a set of enemies of A. By Example 11, among B, C, D, E, F , and G there are either three mutual friends or three mutual enemies, who form, with A, a set of four mutual enemies. 29. We need to show two things: that if we have a group of n people, then among them we must find either a pair of friends or a subset of n of them all of whom are mutual enemies; and that there exists a group of n − 1 people for which this is not possible. For the first statement, if there is any pair of friends, then the condition is satisfied, and if not, then every pair of people are enemies, so the second condition is satisfied. For the second statement, if we have a group of n − 1 people all of whom are enemies of each other, then there is neither a pair of friends nor a subset of n of them all of whom are mutual enemies. 31. There are 6,432,816 possibilities for the three initials and a birthday. So, by the generalized pigeonhole principle, there are at least 37,000,000/6,432,816 = 6 people who share the same initials and birthday. 33. Because 800,001 > 200,000, the pigeonhole principle guarantees that there are at least two Parisians with the same number of hairs on their heads. The generalized pigeonhole principle guarantees that there are at least 800,001/200,000 = 5 Parisians with the same number of hairs on their heads. 35. 18 37. Because there are six computers, the number of other computers a computer is connected to is an integer between 0 and 5, inclusive. However, 0 and 5 cannot both occur. To see this, note that if some

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-43

computer is connected to no others, then no computer is connected to all five others, and if some computer is connected to all five others, then no computer is connected to no others. Hence, by the pigeonhole principle, because there are at most five possibilities for the number of computers a computer is connected to, there are at least two computers in the set of six connected to the same number of others. 39. Label the computers C1 through C100 , and label the printers P1 through P20 . If we connect Ck to Pk for k = 1, 2, . . . , 20 and connect each of the computers C21 through C100 to all the printers, then we have used a total of 20 + 80 · 20 = 1620 cables. Clearly this is sufficient, because if computers C1 through C20 need printers, then they can use the printers with the same subscripts, and if any computers with higher subscripts need a printer instead of one or more of these, then they can use the printers that are not being used, because they are connected to all the printers. Now we must show that 1619 cables is not enough. Because there are 1619 cables and 20 printers, the average number of computers per printer is 1619/20, which is less than 81. Therefore some printer must be connected to fewer than 81 computers. That means it is connected to 80 or fewer computers, so there are 20 computers that are not connected to it. If those 20 computers all needed a printer simultaneously, then they would be out of luck, because they are connected to at most the 19 other printers. 41. Let ai be the number of matches completed by hour i. Then 1 ≤ a1 < a2 < · · · < a75 ≤ 125. Also 25 ≤ a1 + 24 < a2 + 24 < · · · < a75 + 24 ≤ 149. There are 150 numbers a1 , . . . , a75 , a1 + 24, . . . , a75 + 24. By the pigeonhole principle, at least two are equal. Because all the ai s are distinct and all the (ai + 24)s are distinct, it follows that ai = aj + 24 for some i > j . Thus, in the period from the (j + 1)st to the ith hour, there are exactly 24 matches. 43. Use the generalized pigeonhole principle, placing the |S| objects f (s) for s ∈ S in |T | boxes, one for each element of T . 45. Let dj be j x − N(j x), where N(j x) is the integer closest to j x for 1 ≤ j ≤ n. Each dj is an irrational number between −1/2 and 1/2. We will assume that n is even; the case where n is odd is messier. Consider the n intervals {x | j/n < x < (j + 1)/n}, {x | −(j + 1)/n < x < −j/n} for j = 0, 1, . . . , (n/2) − 1. If dj belongs to the interval {x | 0 < x < 1/n} or to the interval {x | −1/n < x < 0} for some j , we are done. If not, because there are n − 2 intervals and n numbers dj , the pigeonhole principle tells us that there is an interval {x | (k − 1)/n < x < k/n} containing dr and ds with r < s. The proof can be finished by showing that (s − r)x is within 1/n of its nearest integer. 47. a) Assume that ik ≤ n for all k. Then by the generalized pigeonhole principle, at least (n2 + 1)/n = n + 1 of the numbers i1 , i2 , . . . , in2 +1 are equal. b) If akj < akj +1 , then the subsequence consisting of akj followed by the increasing subsequence of length ikj +1 starting at akj +1 contradicts the fact that ikj = ikj +1 . Hence, akj > akj +1 . c) If there is no increasing subsequence of length greater than n, then parts (a) and (b) apply. Therefore, we have akn+1 > akn > · · · > ak2 > ak1 , a decreasing sequence of length n + 1.

Section 6.3 1. abc, acb, bac, bca, cab, cba 3. 720 5. a) 120 b) 720 c) 8 d) 6720 e) 40,320 f) 3,628,800 7. 15,120 9. 1320 11. a) 210 b) 386 c) 848 d) 252 13. 2(n!)2 15. 65,780 17. 2100 − 5051 19. a) 1024 b) 45 c) 176 d) 252 21. a) 120 b) 24 c) 120 d) 24 e) 6 f) 0 23. 609,638,400 25. a) 94,109,400 b) 941,094 c) 3,764,376 d) 90,345,024 e) 114,072 f) 2328 g) 24 h) 79,727,040 i) 3,764,376 j) 109,440 27. a) 12,650 b) 303,600 29. a) 37,927 b) 18,915 31. a) 122,523,030 b) 72,930,375 c) 223,149,655 d) 100,626,625 33. 54,600 35. 45 37. 912 39. 11,232,000 41. n!/(r(n − r)!) 43. 13 45. 873

Section 6.4 1. x 4 + 4x 3 y + 6x 2 y 2 + 4xy 3 + y 4 3. x 6 + 6x 5 y + 15x 4 y 2 + 20x 3 y 3 + 15x 2 y 4 + 6xy 5 + y 6 5. 101 7. −210 19 = −94,595,072 9. −2101 399 200 9 99 100 11. (−1)(200−k)/3 (200−k)/3 if k ≡ 2 (mod 3) and −100 ≤ k ≤ 200; 0 otherwise 13. 1 9 36 84 126 126 84 36 9 1 15. The sum of all the positive numbers nk , as k runs from 0 to n, is 2n, so each one of them is no bigger than this sum. 17. nk = n(n−1)(n−2)···(n−k+1) ≤ n nk(k−1)(k−2)···2 n·n·····n n! k k−1 19. k−1 + k = (k−1)!(n−k 2·2·····2 = n /2 + 1)! + n+1 (n+1)! n! n! k k!(n−k)! = k!(n−k+1)! · [k + (n − k + 1)] = k!(n+1−k)! = 21. a) We show that each side counts the number of ways to choose from a set with n elements a subset with k elements and a distinguished element of that set. For the lefthand side, first choose the k-set (this can be done in nk ways) and then choose one of the k elements in this subset to be the distinguished element (this can be done in k ways). For the right-hand side, first choose the distinguished element out of the entire n-set (this can be done in n ways), and then choose the remaining k − 1 elements of the subset from the remaining n − 1 elements of the set (this can be done in n−1 k−1 n·(n−1)! n! = (k−1)!(n−k)! = n n−1 ways). b) k nk = k · k!(n−k)! k−1 (n+1)! n! = (n+1) = (n + 1) = k!(n+1−k)! 23. n+1 k k (k−1)![n−(k−1)]! n n k−1 /k. This identity together with 0 = 1 gives arecursive 2n 2n definition. 25. n+1 + n = 2n+1 = 21 2n+1 + n+1 n+1 2n+1 2n+1 = 21 2n+1 = 21 2n+2 27. a) n+r+1 n+1 n+1 + n n+1 r counts the number of ways to choose a sequence of r 0s and n + 1 1s by choosing the positions of the 0s. Alternately, suppose that the (j + 1)st term is the last term equal to 1, so that n ≤ j ≤ n+r. Once we have determined where the last 1 is, we decide where the 0s are to be placed in the j spaces before the last 1. There are n 1s and j −n 0s in this range. By the sum rule j r n+k it follows that there are n+r k=0 k ways to do j =n j −n = this. b) Let P (r) be the statement to be proved. The basis step is the equation n0 = n+1 , which is just 1 = 1. Assume that 0 n+k r n+k n+r+1 P (r) is true. Then r+1 = k=0 k + r+1 = n+r+1 n+r+1 k=0 n+r+2k + r+1 = r+1 , using the inductive hypothesis r

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-44

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

and Pascal’s identity. 29. We can choose the leader first in n different ways. We can then choose the rest of the committee in 2n−1 ways. Hence, there are n2n−1 ways to choose the committee and its leader. Meanwhile, the number of ways to select a committee with k people is nk . Once we have chosen a committee with k people, are k ways to choose there the its leader. Hence, there are nk=1 knk ways nto choosen−1 n = n2 . committee and its leader. Hence, k=1 k k 31. set have n elements. From Corollary 2 we have n Letthe n n n n = 0. It follows that − + − · · · + (−1) 0 1 2 n n n n n nn 0 + 2 + 4 +· · · = 1 + 3 + 5 +· · · . The left-hand side gives the number of subsets with an even number of elements, and the right-hand side gives the number of subsets with an odd number of elements. 33. a) A path of the desired type consists of m moves to the right and n moves up. Each such path can be represented by a bit string of length m + n with m 0s and n 1s, where a 0 represents a move to the right and a 1 a move up. b) The number of bit strings of length m + n = m+n containing exactly n 1s equals m+n n m because such a string is determined by specifying the positions of the n 1s or by specifying the positions of the m 0s. 35. By Exercise 33 the number of paths of length n of the type described in that exercise equals 2n , the number of bit strings of length n. On the other hand, a path of length n of the type described in Exercise 33 must end at a point that has n as the sum of its coordinates, say (n − k, k) for some k between 0 and n, inclusive. By Exercise 33, thenumber of such ending at (n − k, k) equals n−k+k paths = nk . Hence, nk=0 nk = 2n . 37. By Exercise 33 k the number of paths from (0, 0) to (n + 1, r) of the type de . But such a path starts scribed in that exercise equals n+r+1 r by going j steps vertically for some j with 0 ≤ j ≤ r. The number of these paths beginning with j vertical steps equals the number of paths of the type described in Exercise 33 that go from (1, j ) to (n + 1, r). This is the same as the number of such pathsthat gofrom (0, 0) to (n,r − j ),which n+k rby Exercise r n+r−j . Because = 33 equals n+r−j j =0 r−j k=0 k , it r−j n+r−1 = . 39. a) n+1 b) n+2 follows that rk=1 n+k r 2 3 n−1 k 2n−2 c) n−1 d) (n−1)/2) e) Largest odd entry in nth row of Pascal’s triangle f) 3n−3 n−1

Section 6.5 1. 243 3. 266 5. 125 7. 35 9. a) 1716 b) 50,388 c) 2,629,575 d) 330 11. 9 13. 4,504,501 15. a) 10,626 b) 1,365 c) 11,649 d) 106 17. 2,520 19. 302,702,400 21. 3003 23. 7,484,400 25. 30,492 27. C(59, 50) 29. 35 31. 83,160 33. 63 35. 19,635 37. 210 39. 27,720 41. 52!/(7!5 17!) 43. Approximately 6.5 × 1032 45. a) C(k + n − 1, n)b) (k + n − 1)!/(k − 1)! 47. There are C(n, n1 ) ways to choose n1 objects for the first box. Once these objects are chosen, there are C(n − n1 , n2 ) ways to choose objects for the second box. Similarly, there are C(n − n1 − n2 , n3 ) ways to choose objects for the third box. Continue in this way until there is

C(n − n1 − n2 − · · · − nk−1 , nk ) = C(nk , nk ) = 1 way to choose the objects for the last box (because n1 + n2 + · · · + nk = n). By the product rule, the number of ways to make the entire assignment is C(n, n1 )C(n − n1 , n2 )C(n − n1 − n2 , n3 ) · · · C(n − n1 − n2 − · · · − nk−1 , nk ), which equals n!/(n1 !n2 ! · · · nk !), as straightforward simplification shows. 49. a) Because x1 ≤ x2 ≤ · · · ≤ xr , it follows that x1 + 0 < x2 + 1 < · · · < xr + r − 1. The inequalities are strict because xj + j − 1 < xj +1 + j as long as xj ≤ xj +1 . Because 1 ≤ xj ≤ n + r − 1, this sequence is made up of r distinct elements from T . b) Suppose that 1 ≤ x1 < x2 < · · · < xr ≤ n + r − 1. Let yk = xk − (k − 1). Then it is not hard to see that yk ≤ yk+1 for k = 1, 2, . . . , r − 1 and that 1 ≤ yk ≤ n for k = 1, 2, . . . r. It follows that {y1 , y2 , . . . , yr } is an r-combination with repetitions allowed of S. c) From parts (a) and (b) it follows that there is a one-to-one correspondence of r-combinations with repetitions allowed of S and r-combinations of T , a set with n + r − 1 elements. We conclude that there are C(n + r − 1, r) r-combinations with repetitions allowed of S. 51. 65 53. 65 55. 2 57. 3 59. a) 150 b) 25 c) 6 d) 2 61. 90,720 63. The terms in the expansion are nm of the form x1n1 x2n2 · · · xm , where n1 + n2 + · · · + nm = n. Such a term arises from choosing the x1 in n1 factors, the x2 in n2 factors, . . . , and the xm in nm factors. This can be done in C(n; n1 , n2 , . . . , nm ) ways, because a choice is a permutation of n1 labels “1,” n2 labels “2,” . . . , and nm labels “m.” 65. 2520

Section 6.6 1. 14532, 15432, 21345, 23451, 23514, 31452, 31542, 43521, 45213, 45321 3. AAA1, AAA2, AAB1, AAB2, AAC1, AAC2, ABA1, ABA2, ABB1, ABB2, ABC1, ABC2, ACA1, ACA2, ACB1, ACB2, ACC1, ACC2, BAA1, BAA2, BAB1, BAB2, BAC1, BAC2, BBA1, BBA2, BBB1, BBB2, BBC1, BBC2, BCA1, BCA2, BCB1, BCB2, BCC1, BCC2, CAA1, CAA2, CAB1, CAB2, CAC1, CAC2, CBA1, CBA2, CBB1, CBB2, CBC1, CBC2, CCA1, CCA2, CCB1, CCB2, CCC1, CCC2 5. a) 2134 b) 54132 c) 12534 d) 45312 ) 7.1234, 1243, 1324, 1342, 1423, 1432, 2134, 2143, 2314, 2341, 2413, 2431, 3124, 3142, 3214, 3241, 3412, 3421, 4123, 4132, 4213, 4231, 4312, 4321 9. {1, 2, 3}, {1, 2, 4}, {1, 2, 5}, {1, 3, 4}, {1, 3, 5}, {1, 4, 5}, {2, 3, 4}, {2, 3, 5}, {2, 4, 5}, {3, 4, 5} 11. The bit string representing the next larger r-combination must differ from the bit string representing the original one in position i because positions i + 1, . . . , r are occupied by the largest possible numbers. Also ai + 1 is the smallest possible number we can put in position i if we want a combination greater than the original one. Then ai + 2, . . . , ai + r − i + 1 are the smallest allowable numbers for positions i + 1 to r. Thus, we have produced the next r-combination. 13. 123, 132, 213, 231, 312, 321, 124, 142, 214, 241, 412, 421, 125, 152, 215, 251, 512, 521, 134, 143, 314, 341, 413, 431, 135, 153, 315, 351, 513, 531, 145, 154, 415, 451, 514, 541, 234, 243, 324, 342, 423, 432,

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-45

235, 253, 325, 352, 523, 532, 245, 254, 425, 452, 524, 542, 345, 354, 435, 453, 534, 543 15. We will show that it is a bijection by showing that it has an inverse. Given a positive integer less than n!, let a1 , a2 , . . . , an−1 be its Cantor digits. Put n in position n − an−1 ; then clearly, an−1 is the number of integers less than n that follow n in the permutation. Then put n − 1 in free position (n − 1) − an−2 , where we have numbered the free positions 1, 2, . . . , n − 1 (excluding the position that n is already in). Continue until 1 is placed in the only free position left. Because we have constructed an inverse, the correspondence is a bijection. 17. procedure Cantor permutation(n, i: integers with n ≥ 1 and 0 ≤ i < n!) x := n for j := 1 to n pj := 0 for k := 1 to n − 1 c := x/(n − k)!; x := x − c(n − k)!; h := n while ph = 0 h := h − 1 for j := 1 to c h := h − 1 while ph = 0 h := h − 1 ph := n − k + 1 h := 1 while ph = 0 h := h + 1 ph := 1 {p1 p2 . . . pn is the permutation corresponding to i}

Supplementary Exercises 1. a) 151,200 b) 1,000,000 c) 210 d) 5005 3. 3100 5. 24,600 7. a) 4060 b) 2688 c) 25,009,600 9. a) 192 b) 301 c) 300 d) 300 11. 639 13. The maximum possible sum is 240, and the minimum possible sum is 15. So the number of possible sums is 226. Because there are 252 subsets with five elements of a set with 10 elements, by the pigeonhole principle it follows that at least two have the same sum. 15. a) 50 b) 50 c) 14 d) 17 17. Let a1 , a2 , . . . , am be the integers, and let di = ij =1 aj . If di ≡ 0 (mod m) for some i, we are done. Otherwise d1 mod m, d2 mod m, . . . , dm mod m are m integers with values in {1, 2, . . . , m − 1}. By the pigeonhole principle dk = dl for some 1 ≤ k < l ≤ m. Then lj =k+1 aj = dl − dk ≡ 0 (mod m). 19. The decimal expansion of the rational number a/b can be obtained by division of b into a, where a is written with a decimal point and an arbitrarily long string of 0s following it. The basic step is finding the next digit of the quotient, namely, r/b, where r is the remainder with the next digit of the dividend brought down. The current remainder is obtained from the previous remainder by subtracting b times the previous digit of the quotient. Eventually the dividend has nothing but 0s to bring down. Furthermore, there are only

b possible remainders. Thus, at some point, by the pigeonhole principle, we will have the same situation as had previously arisen. From that point onward, the calculation must follow the same pattern. In particular, the quotient will repeat. 21. a) 125,970 b) 20 c) 141,120,525 d) 141,120,505 e) 177,100 f) 141,078,021 23. a) 10 b) 8 c) 7 25. 3n 27. C(n + 2, r + 1) = C(n + 1, r + 1) + C(n + 1, r) = 2C(n + 1, r + 1) − C(n + 1, r + 1) + C(n + 1, r) = 2C(n + 1, r + 1) − (C(n, r + 1) + C(n, r)) + (C(n, r) + C(n, r − 1)) = 2C(n + 1, r + 1) − C(n, r + 1) + C(n, r −1) 29. Substitute x = 1 and y = 3 into the binomial theorem. 31. Both sides count the number of ways to choose a subset of three distinct numbers {i, j, k} with i < j < k from {1, 2, . . . , n}. 33. C(n + 1, 5) 35. 3,491,888,400 37. 524 39. a) 45 b) 57 c) 12 41. a) 386 b) 56 43. 0 if n < m; C(n − 1, n − m) if n ≥ m 45. a) 15,625 b) 202 c) 210 d) 10 47. a) 3 b) 11 c) 6 d) 10 49. There are two possibilities: three people seated at one table with everyone else sitting alone, which can be done in 2C(n, 3) ways (choose the three people and seat them in one of two arrangements), or two groups of two people seated together with everyone else sitting alone, which can be done in 3C(n, 4) ways (choose four people and then choose one of the three ways to pair them up). Both 2C(n, 3) + 3C(n, 4) and (3n − 1)C(n, 3)/4 equal n4 /8 − 5n3 /12 + 3n2 /8 − n/12. 51. The number of permutations of 2n objects of n different types, two of each type, is (2n)!/2n . Because this must be an integer, the denominator must divide the numerator. 53. CCGGUCCGAAAG 55. procedure next permutation(n: positive integer, a1 , a2 , . . . , ar : positive integers not exceeding n with a1 a2 . . . ar = nn . . . n) i := r while ai = n ai := 1 i := i − 1 ai := ai + 1 {a1 a2 . . . ar is the next permutation in lexicographic order} 57. We must show that if there are R(m, n − 1) + R(m − 1, n) people at a party, then there must be at least m mutual friends or n mutual enemies. Consider one person; let’s call him Jerry. Then there are R(m − 1, n) + R(m, n − 1) − 1 other people at the party, and by the pigeonhole principle there must be at least R(m − 1, n) friends of Jerry or R(m, n − 1) enemies of Jerry among these people. First let’s suppose there are R(m − 1, n) friends of Jerry. By the definition of R, among these people we are guaranteed to find either m − 1 mutual friends or n mutual enemies. In the former case, these m−1mutual friends together with Jerry are a set of m mutual friends; and in the latter case, we have the desired set of n mutual enemies. The other situation is similar: Suppose there are R(m, n − 1) enemies of Jerry; we are guaranteed to find among them either m mutual friends or n − 1 mutual enemies. In the former case, we have the desired set of m mutual friends, and in the latter case, these n − 1 mutual enemies together with Jerry are a set of n mutual enemies.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-46

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

CHAPTER 7 Section 7.1 1. 1/13 3. 1/2 5. 1/2 7. 1/64 9. 47/52 11. 1/C(52, 5) 13. 1 − [C(48, 5)/C(52, 5)] 15. C(13, 2)C(4, 2)C(4, 2) C(44, 1)/C(52, 5) 17. 10,240/C(52, 5) 19. 1,302,540/ C(52, 5) 21. 1/64 23. 8/25 25. a) 1/ C(50, 6) = 1/15,890,700 b) 1/C(52, 6) = 1/20,358,520 c) 1/C(56, 6) = 1/32,468,436 d) 1/C(60, 6) = 1/ 50,063,860 27. a) 139,128/319,865 b) 212, 667/511,313 c) 151,340/386,529 d) 163,647/446,276 29. 1/C(100, 8) 31. 3/100 33. a) 1/7,880,400 b) 1/8,000,000 35. a) 9/19 b) 81/361 c) 1/19 d) 1,889,568/2,476,099 e) 48/361 37. Three dice 39. The door the contestant chooses is chosen at random without knowing where the prize is, but the door chosen by the host is not chosen at random, because he always avoids opening the door with the prize. This makes any argument based on symmetry invalid. 41. a) 671/1296 b) 1 − 3524 /3624 ; no c) The former

Section 7.2 1. p(T ) = 1/4, p(H ) = 3/4 3. p(1) = p(3) = p(5) = p(6) = 1/16; p(2) = p(4) = 3/8 5. 9/49 7. a) 1/2 b) 1/2 c) 1/3 d) 1/4 e) 1/4 9. a) 1/26! b) 1/26 c) 1/2 d) 1/26 e) 1/650 f) 1/15,600 11. Clearly, p(E ∪ F ) ≥ p(E) = 0.7. Also, p(E ∪ F ) ≤ 1. If we apply Theorem 2 from Section 7.1, we can rewrite this as p(E) + p(F ) − p(E ∩ F ) ≤ 1, or 0.7 + 0.5 − p(E ∩ F ) ≤ 1. Solving for p(E ∩ F ) gives p(E ∩ F ) ≥ 0.2. 13. Because p(E ∪ F ) = p(E) + p(F ) − p(E ∩ F ) and p(E ∪ F ) ≤ 1, it follows that 1 ≥ p(E) + p(F ) − p(E ∩ F ). From this inequality we conclude that p(E) + p(F ) ≤ 1 + p(E ∩ F ). 15. We will use mathematical induction to prove that the inequality holds forn ≥ 2. Let P (n) be the statement that n p( nj=1 Ej ) ≤ j =1 p(Ej ). Basis step: P (2) is true because p(E1 ∪ E2 ) = p(E1 ) + p(E2 ) − p(E1 ∩ E2 ) ≤ p(E1 ) + p(E2 ). Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true. Usingthe basis case and inductive hypothesis, it follows that the k k+1 p( k+1 j =1 Ej ) ≤ p( j =1 Ej ) + p(Ek+1 ) ≤ j =1 p(Ej ). This shows that P (k+1) is true, completing the proof by mathematical induction. 17. Because E ∪ E is the entire sample space S, the event F can be split into two disjoint events: F = S ∩ F = (E ∪ E) ∩ F = (E ∩ F ) ∪ (E ∩ F ), using the distributive law. Therefore, p(F ) = p((E ∩ F ) ∪ (E ∩ F )) = p(E ∩ F ) + p(E ∩ F ), because these two events are disjoint. Subtracting p(E ∩ F ) from both sides, using the fact that p(E ∩ F ) = p(E) · p(F ) (the hypothesis that E and F are independent), and factoring, we have p(F )[1− p(E)] = p(E ∩ F ). Because 1 − p(E) = p(E), this says that p(E ∩ F ) = p(E) · p(F ), as desired. 19. a) 1/12 11 10 · 12 · · · · · 13−n 21. 614 23. 1/4 25. 3/8 b) 1 − 12 12 c) 5 27. a) Not independent b) Not independent c) Not independent 29. 3/16 31. a) 1/32 = 0.03125 b) 0.495 ≈

0.02825 c) 0.03795012 33. a) 5/8 b) 0.627649 c) 0.6431 b) 1 − p n c) p n + n · p n−1 35. a) pn ∞ · (1 − p) d) 1 − [p n + n · p n−1 · (1 − p)] 37. p( i=1 Ei ) is the sum of p(s) for each outcome s in ∞ E i=1 i . Because the Ei s are pairwise disjoint, this is the sum of the probabilities ∞ of all the outcomes in any of the Ei s, which is what i=1 p(Ei ) is. (We can rearrange the summands and still get the same answerm because this series converges absolutely.) ( k ) 39. a) E = j =1 Fj , so the given inequality now follows from Boole’s Inequality (Exercise 15). b) The probability that a particular player not in the j th set beats all k of the players in the j th set is (1/2)k = 2−k . Therefore, the probability that this player does not do so is 1 − 2−k , so the probability that all m − k of the players not in the j th set are unable to boast of a perfect record against everyone in the j th set is (1 − 2−k )m−k . That is precisely p(Fj ). c) The first inequality follows immediately, because all the summands are the same and there are mk of them. If this probability is less than 1, then it must be possible that E fails, i.e., that E happens. So there is a tournament that meets the conditions of the problem as long as the second inequality holds. d) m ≥ 21 for k = 2, and m ≥ 91 for k = 3 41. procedure probabilistic prime(n, k) composite := false i := 0 while composite = false and i < k i := i + 1 choose b uniformly at random with 1 < b < n apply Miller’s test to base b if n fails the test then composite := true if composite = true then print (“composite”) else print (“probably prime”)

Section 7.3 NOTE: In the answers for Section 7.3, all probabilities given in decimal form are rounded to three decimal places. 1. 3/5 3. 3/4 5. 0.481 7. a) 0.999 b) 0.324 9. a) 0.740 b) 0.260 c) 0.002 d) 0.998 11. 0.724 13. 3/17 15. a) 1/3 b) p(M = j | W = k) = 1 if i, j , and k are distinct; p(M = j | W = k) = 0 if j = k or j = i; p(M = j | W = k) = 1/2 if i = k and j = i c) 2/3 d) You should change doors, because you now have a 2/3 chance to win by switching. 17. The definition of conditional probability tells us that p(Fj | E) = p(E ∩ Fj )/p(E). For the numerator, again using the definition of conditional probability, we have p(E ∩ Fj ) = p(E | Fj )p(F j ), as desired. For the denominator, we show that p(E) = ni=1 p(E | Fi )p(Fi ). The events E ∩ Fi partition the event E; that is, (E ∩ Fi1 ) ∩ (E ∩ Fi2 ) = ∅ when ii = i2 (because the Fi ’s aremutually exclusive), and n n ∩ Fi1 ) = E (because i=1 (E nthe i=1 Fi = S). Therefore, n p(E) = i=1 p(E ∩ Fi ) = i=1 p(E | Fi )p(Fi ). 19. No 21. Yes 23. By Bayes’ theorem, p(S | E1 ∩ E2 ) = p(E1 ∩ E2 | S)p(S)/[p(E1 ∩ E2 | S)p(S) + p(E1 ∩ E2 | S)p(S)].

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-47

Because we are assuming no prior knowledge about whether a message is or is not spam, we set p(S) = p(S) = 0.5, and so the equation above simplifies to p(S | E1 ∩ E2 ) = p(E1 ∩ E2 | S)/[p(E1 ∩ E2 | S) + p(E1 ∩ E2 | S)]. Because of the assumed independence of E1 , E2 , and S, we have p(E1 ∩ E2 | S) = p(E1 | S) · p(E2 | S), and similarly for S.

Section 7.4 1. 2.5 3. 5/3 5. 336/49 7. 170 9. (4n + 6)/3 11. 50,700,551/10,077,696 ≈ 5.03 p(X ≥ ∞ ∞ 13. 6 15.k−1 j) = p(X = k) = (1 − p) p = k=j k=j k = p(1 − p)j −1 /(1 − (1 − p)) = (1 − p) p(1 − p)j −1 ∞ k=0 (1 − p)j −1 17. 2302 19. (7/2) · 7 = 329/12 21. 10 23. 1472 pounds 25. p + (n − 1)p(1 − p) 27. 5/2 29. a) 0 b) n 31. This is not true. For example, let X be the number of heads in one flip of a fair coin, and let Y be the number of heads in one flip of a second fair coin. Then A(X) + A(Y ) = 1 but A(X + Y ) = 0.5. 33. a) We are told that X1 and X2 are independent. To see that X1 and X3 are independent, we enumerate the eight possibilities for (X1 , X2 , X3 ) and find that (0, 0, 0), (1, 0, 1), (0, 1, 1), (1, 1, 0) each have probability 1/4 and the others have probability 0 (because of the definition of X3 ). Thus, p(X1 = 0 ∧ X3 = 0) = 1/4, p(X1 = 0) = 1/2, and p(X3 = 0) = 1/2, so it is true that p(X1 = 0 ∧ X3 = 0) = p(X1 = 0)p(X3 = 0). Essentially the same calculation shows that p(X1 = 0 ∧ X3 = 1) = p(X1 = 0)p(X3 = 1), p(X1 = 1 ∧ X3 = 0) = p(X1 = 1)p(X3 = 0), and p(X1 = 1 ∧ X3 = 1) = p(X1 = 1)p(X3 = 1). Therefore by definition, X1 and X3 are independent. The same reasoning shows that X2 and X3 are independent. To see that X3 and X1 + X2 are not independent, we observe that p(X3 = 1 ∧ X1 + X2 = 2) = 0. But p(X3 = 1)p(X1 + X2 = 2) = (1/2)(1/4) = 1/8. b) We see from the calculation in part (a) that X1 , X2 , and X3 are all Bernoulli random variables, so the variance of each is (1/2)(1/2) = 1/4. Therefore, V (X1 ) + V (X2 ) + V (X3 ) = 3/4. We use the calculations in part (a) to see that E(X1 + X2 + X3 ) = 3/2, and then V (X1 + X2 + X3 ) = 3/4. c) In order to use the first part of Theorem 7 to show that V ((X1 + X2 + · · · + Xk ) + Xk+1 ) = V (X1 + X2 + · · · + Xk ) + V (Xk+1 ) in the inductive step of a proof by mathematical induction, we would have to know that X1 + X2 + · · · + Xk and Xk+1 are independent, but we see from part (a)that this is not necessarily true. 35. 1/100 37. E(X)/a = r (r/a) · p(X = r) ≥ r≥a 1 · p(X = r) = p(X ≥ a) 39. a) 10/11 b) 0.9999 41. a) Each of the n! permutations occurs with probability 1/n!, so E(X) is the number of comparisons, averaged over all these permutations. b) Even if the algorithm continues n − 1 rounds, X will be at most n(n − 1)/2. It follows from the formula for expectation that E(X) ≤ n(n − 1)/2. c) The algorithm proceeds by comparing adjacent elements and then swapping them if necessary. Thus, the only way that inverted elements can become uninverted is for them to be compared and swapped.

d) Because X(P ) ≥ I (P ) for all P , it follows from the definition of expectation that E(X) ≥ E(I ). e) This summation counts 1 for every instance of an inversion. f) This follows from Theorem 3. g) By Theorem 2 with n = 1, the expectation of Ij,k is the probability that ak precedes aj in the permutation. This is clearly 1/2 by symmetry. h) The summation in part (f) consists of C(n, 2) = n(n − 1)/2 terms, each equal to 1/2, so the sum is n(n − 1)/4. i) From part (a) and part (b) we know that E(X), the object of interest, is at most n(n − 1)/2, and from part (d) and part (h) we know that E(X) is at least n(n − 1)/4, both of which are (n2 ). 43. 1 45. V (X + Y ) = E((X + Y )2 ) − E(X + Y )2 = E(X2 + 2XY + Y 2 ) − [E(X) + E(Y )]2 = E(X2 ) + 2E(XY ) + E(Y 2 ) − E(X)2 − 2E(X)E(Y ) − E(Y )2 = E(X2 ) − E(X)2 + 2[E(XY ) − E(X)E(Y )] + E(Y 2 ) − E(Y )2 = V (X) + 2 Cov(X, Y ) + V (Y ) 47. [(n − 1)/n]m 49. (n − 1)m /nm−1

Supplementary Exercises 1. 1/109,668 3. a) 1/195,249,054 b) 1/5,138,133 c) 45/357,599 d) 18,285/18,821 5. a) 1/C(52, 13) b) 4/C(52, 13) c) 2,944,656/C(52, 13) d) 35,335,872/ C(52, 13) 7. a) 9/2 b) 21/4 9. a) 9 b) 21/2 11. a) 8 b) 49/6 13. a) n/2n−1 b) p(1 − p)k−1 , where p = n/2n−1 c) 2n−1 /n 15. (m−1)(n−1)+gcd(m,n)−1 17. a) 2/3 b) 2/3 mn−1 19. 1/32 21. a) The probability that one wins 2n dollars is 1/2n , because that happens precisely when the player gets n − 1 tails followed by a head. The expected value of the winnings is therefore the sum of 2n times 1/2n as n goes from 1 to infinity. Because each of these terms is 1, the sum is infinite. In other words, one should be willing to wager any amount of money and expect to come out ahead in the long run. b) $9, $9 23. a) 1/3 when S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12}, A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}, and B = {1, 2, 3, 4}; 1/12 when S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12}, A = {4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12}, and B = {1, 2, 3, 4} b) 1 when S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12}, A = {4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12}, and B = {1, 2, 3, 4}; 3/4 when S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12}, A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}, and B = {1, 2, 3, 4} 25. a) p(E1 ∩ E2 ) = p(E1 )p(E2 ), p(E1 ∩ E3 ) = p(E1 )p(E3 ), p(E2 ∩E3 ) = p(E2 )p(E3 ), p(E1 ∩E2 ∩E3 ) = p(E1 ) p(E2 )p(E3 ) b) Yes c) Yes; yes d) Yes; no e) 2n −n−1 27. a) 1/2 under first interpretation; 1/3 under second interpretation b) Let M be the event that both of Mr. Smith’s children are boys and let B be the event that Mr. Smith chose a boy for today’s walk. Then p(M) = 1/4, p(B | M) = 1, and p(B | M) = 1/3. Apply Bayes’ theorem to compute p(M | B) = 1/2. c) This variation is equivalent to the second interpretation discussed in part (a), so the answer is unambiguously 1/3. 29. V (aX + b) = E((aX + b)2 ) − E(aX + b)2 = E(a 2 X 2 + 2abX + b2 ) − [aE(X) + b]2 = E(a 2 X 2 )+E(2abX)+E(b2 )−[a 2 E(X)2 +2abE(X)+b2 ] = a 2 E(X 2 ) + 2abE(X) + b2 − a 2 E(X)2 − 2abE(X) − b2 =

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-48

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

a 2 [E(X 2 ) âˆ’ E(X)2 ] = a 2 V (X) 31. To count every element in the sample space exactly once, we must include every element in each of the sets and then take away the double counting of the elements in the intersections. Thus p(E1 âˆŞ E2 âˆŞ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆŞ Em ) = p(E1 ) + p(E2 ) + Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ + p(Em ) âˆ’ p(E1 âˆŠE2 )âˆ’p(E1 âˆŠE3 )âˆ’Âˇ Âˇ Âˇâˆ’p(E1 âˆŠEm )âˆ’p(E2 âˆŠE3 )âˆ’ p(E2 âˆŠ E4 ) âˆ’ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆ’ p(E2 âˆŠ Em ) âˆ’ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆ’ p(Emâˆ’1 âˆŠ Em ) = qm âˆ’ (m(m âˆ’ 1)/2)r, because C(m, 2) terms are being subtracted. But p(E1 âˆŞ E2 âˆŞ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ âˆŞ Em ) = 1, so we have qmâˆ’[m(mâˆ’1)/2]r = 1. Because r â‰Ľ 0, this equation tells us that qm â‰Ľ 1, so q â‰Ľ 1/m. Because q â‰¤ 1, this equation also implies that [m(m âˆ’ 1)/2]r = qm âˆ’ 1 â‰¤ m âˆ’ 1, from which it follows that r â‰¤ 2/m. 33. a) We purchase the cards until we have gotten one of each type. That means we have purchased X cards in all. On the other hand, that also means that we purchased X0 cards until we got the first type we got, and then purchased X1 more cards until we got the second type we got, and so on. Thus, X is the sum of the Xj â€™s. b) Once j distinct types have been obtained, there are n âˆ’ j new types available out of a total of n types available. Because it is equally likely that we get each type, the probability of success on the next purchase (getting a new type) is (n âˆ’ j )/n. c) This follows immediately from the definition of geometric distribution, the definition of Xj , and part (b). d) From part (c) it follows that E(Xj ) = n/(n âˆ’ j ). Thus by the linearity of expectation and part (a), we have E(X) = E(X 0 ) + E(X1 ) + Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ+ E(Xnâˆ’1 ) n 1 + Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ + n1 = n n1 + nâˆ’1 + Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ + 11 . e) About = nn + nâˆ’1 224.46

35. 24 Âˇ 134 /(52 Âˇ 51 Âˇ 50 Âˇ 49)

CHAPTER 8 Section 8.1 1. Let P (n) be â€œHn = 2n âˆ’1.â€? Basis step: P (1) is true because H1 = 1. Inductive step: Assume that Hn = 2n âˆ’ 1. Then because Hn+1 = 2Hn +1, it follows that Hn+1 = 2(2n âˆ’1)+1 = 2n+1 âˆ’ 1. 3. a) an = 2anâˆ’1 + anâˆ’5 for n â‰Ľ 5 b) a0 = 1, a1 = 2, a2 = 4, a3 = 8, a4 = 16 c) 1217 5. 9494 7. a) an = anâˆ’1 + anâˆ’2 + 2nâˆ’2 for n â‰Ľ 2 b) a0 = 0, a1 = 0 c) 94 9. a) an = anâˆ’1 + anâˆ’2 + anâˆ’3 for n â‰Ľ 3 b) a0 = 1, a1 = 2, a2 = 4 c) 81 11. a) an = anâˆ’1 + anâˆ’2 for n â‰Ľ 2 b) a0 = 1, a1 = 1 c) 34 13. a) an = 2anâˆ’1 + 2anâˆ’2 for n â‰Ľ 2 b) a0 = 1, a1 = 3 c) 448 15. a) an = 2anâˆ’1 + anâˆ’2 for n â‰Ľ 2 b) a0 = 1, a1 = 3 c) 239 17. a) an = 2anâˆ’1 for n â‰Ľ 2 b) a1 = 3 c) 96 19. a) an = anâˆ’1 + anâˆ’2 for n â‰Ľ 2 b) a0 = 1, a1 = 1 c) 89 21. a) Rn = n + Rnâˆ’1 , R0 = 1 b) Rn = n(n+1)/2 +1 23. a) Sn = Snâˆ’1 +(n2 âˆ’n+2)/2, S0 = 1 b) Sn = (n3 + 5n + 6)/6 25. 64 27. a) an = 2anâˆ’1 + 2anâˆ’2 b) a0 = 1, a1 = 3 c) 1224 29. Clearly, S(m, 1) = 1 for m â‰Ľ 1. If m â‰Ľ n, then a function that is not onto from the set with m elements to the set with n elements can be specified by picking the size of the range, which is an integer between 1 and n âˆ’ 1 inclusive, picking the elements of the range, which can be done in C(n, k) ways, and picking an onto function onto the range, which can be

done in S(m, k) ways. Hence, there are nâˆ’1 k=1 C(n, k)S(m, k) m func- tions that are not onto. But there nâˆ’1are n functions m altogether, so S(m, n) = n âˆ’ k=1 C(n, k)S(m, k). 31. a) C5 = C0 C4 + C1 C3 + C2 C2 + C3 C1 + C4 C0 = 1 Âˇ 14 + 1 Âˇ 5 + 2 Âˇ 2 + 5 Âˇ 1 + 14 Âˇ 1 = 42 b) C(10, 5)/6 = 42 33. J (1) = 1, J (2) = 1, J (3) = 3, J (4) = 1, J (5) = 3, J (6) = 5, J (7) = 7, J (8) = 1, J (9) = 3, J (10) = 5, J (11) = 7, J (12) = 9, J (13) = 11, J (14) = 13, J (15) = 15, J (16) = 1 35. First, suppose that the number of people is even, say 2n. After going around the circle once and returning to the first person, because the people at locations with even numbers have been eliminated, there are exactly n people left and the person currently at location i is the person who was originally at location 2iâˆ’1. Therefore, the survivor [originally in location J (2n)] is now in location J (n); this was the person who was at location 2J (n) âˆ’ 1. Hence, J (2n) = 2J (n) âˆ’ 1. Similarly, when there are an odd number of people, say 2n+1, then after going around the circle once and then eliminating person 1, there are n people left and the person currently at location i is the person who was at location 2i +1. Therefore, the survivor will be the player currently occupying location J (n), namely, the person who was originally at location 2J (n) + 1. Hence, J (2n + 1) = 2J (n) + 1. The basis step is J (1) = 1. 37. 73, 977, 3617 39. These nine moves solve the puzzle: Move disk 1 from peg 1 to peg 2; move disk 2 from peg 1 to peg 3; move disk 1 from peg 2 to peg 3; move disk 3 from peg 1 to peg 2; move disk 4 from peg 1 to peg 4; move disk 3 from peg 2 to peg 4; move disk 1 from peg 3 to peg 2; move disk 2 from peg 3 to peg 4; move disk 1 from peg 2 to peg 4. To see that at least nine moves are required, first note that at least seven moves are required no matter how many pegs are present: three to unstack the disks, one to move the largest disk 4, and three more moves to restack them. At least two other moves are needed, because to move disk 4 from peg 1 to peg 4 the other three disks must be on pegs 2 and 3, so at least one move is needed to restack them and one move to unstack them. 41. The base cases are obvious. If n > 1, the algorithm consists of three stages. In the first stage, by the inductive hypothesis, R(n âˆ’ k) moves are used to transfer the smallest n âˆ’ k disks to peg 2. Then using the usual three-peg Tower of Hanoi algorithm, it takes 2k âˆ’1 moves to transfer the rest of the disks (the largest k disks) to peg 4, avoiding peg 2. Then again by the inductive hypothesis, it takes R(n âˆ’ k) moves to transfer the smallest n âˆ’ k disks to peg 4; all the pegs are available for this, because the largest disks, now on peg 4, do not interfere. This establishes the recurrence relation. 43. First note that R(n) = nj=1 [R(j ) âˆ’ R(j âˆ’ 1)] [which follows because the sum is telescoping and R(0) = 0]. By Exercise 42, this is the sum of 2k âˆ’1 for this range of values of j . Therefore, the sum is ki=1 i2iâˆ’1 , except that if n is not a triangular number, then the last few values when i = k are missing, and that is what the final term in the given expression accounts for. 45. By Exercise 43, R(n) is no larger than ki=1 i2iâˆ’1 . It can be shown that this sum equals (k +1)2k âˆ’2k+1 +1, so it is no greater than (k +1)2k . Because n > k(kâˆ’1)/2, the quadratic formula can be used to show that

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-49

√ k < 1 + √2n for all n > R(n) is bounded above √ 1. Therefore, √ √ by (1 + 2n + √1)21+ 2n < 8 n2 2n for all n > 2. Hence, √ R(n) is O( n2 2n ). 47. a) 0 b) 0 c) 2 d) 2n−1 − 2n−2 49. an −2∇an +∇ 2 an = an −2(an −an−1 )+(∇an −∇an−1 ) = −an + 2an−1 + [(an − an−1 ) − (an−1 − an−2 )] = −an + 2an−1 + (an − 2an−1 + an−2 ) = an−2 51. an = an−1 + an−2 = (an − ∇an ) + (an − 2∇an + ∇ 2 an ) = 2an − 3∇an + ∇ 2 an , or an = 3∇an − ∇ 2 an 53. Insert S(0) := ∅ after T (0) := 0 (where S(j ) will record the optimal set of talks among the first j talks), and replace the statement T (j ) := max(wj + T (p(j )), T (j − 1)) with the following code: if wj + T (p(j )) > T (j − 1) then T (j ) := wj + T (p(j )) S(j ) := S(p(j )) ∪ {j } else T (j ) := T (j − 1) S(j ) := S(j − 1) 55. a) Talks 1, 3, and 7 b) Talks 1 and 6, or talks 1, 3, and 7 c) Talks 1, 3, and 7 d) Talks 1 and 6 57. a) This follows immediately from Example 5 and Exercise 41c in Section 8.4. b) The last step in computing Aij is to multiply Aik by Ak+1,j for some k between i and j − 1 inclusive, which will require mi mk+1 mj +1 integer multiplications, independent of the manner in which Aik and Ak+1,j are computed. Therefore to minimize the total number of integer multiplications, each of those two factors must be computed in the most efficient manner. c) This follows immediately from part (b) and the definition of M(i, j ). d) procedure matrix order(m1 , . . . , mn+1 : positive integers) for i := 1 to n M(i, i) := 0 for d := 1 to n − 1 for i := 1 to n − d min := 0 for k := i to i + d new := M(i, k) + M(k + 1, i + d) + mi mk+1 mi+d+1 if new < min then min := new where(i, i + d) := k M(i, i + d) := min e) The algorithm has three nested loops, each of which is indexed over at most n values.

Section 8.2 1. a) Degree 3 b) No c) Degree 4 d) No e) No f) Degree 2 g) No 3. a) an = 3 · 2n b) an = 2 c) an = 3 · 2n − 2 · 3n d) an = 6 · 2n − 2 · n2n e) an = n(−2)n−1 f) an = 2n − (−2)n g) an = (1/2)n+1 − (−1/2)n+1 √ n+1 √ n+1 5. an = √1 1+2 5 − √1 1−2 5 7. [2n+1 +(−1)n ]/3 5

5

9. a) Pn = 1.2Pn−1 + 0.45Pn−2 , P0 = 100,000, P1 = 120,000 b) Pn = (250,000/3)(3/2)n +(50,000/3)(−3/10)n

11. a) Basis step: For n = 1 we have 1 = 0 + 1, and for n = 2 we have 3 = 1 + 2. Inductive step: Assume true for k ≤ n. Then Ln+1 = Ln + Ln−1 = fn−1 + fn+1 + fn−2 + fn = (fn−1 + fn−2 ) + (fn+1 + fn ) = √ n √ n fn + fn+2 . b) Ln = 1+2 5 + 1−2 5 13. an = 8(−1)n − 3(−2)n + 4 · 3n 15. an = 5 + 3(−2)n − 3n 17. Let an = C(n, 0) + C(n − 1, 1) + · · · + C(n − k, k) where k = n/2. First, assume that n is even, so that k = n/2, and the last term is C(k, k). By Pascal’s identity we have an = 1 + C(n − 2, 0) + C(n − 2, 1) + C(n − 3, 1) + C(n − 3, 2) + · · · + C(n − k, k − 2) + C(n − k, k − 1) + 1 = 1 + C(n − 2, 1) + C(n − 3, 2) + · · · + C(n − k, k − 1) + C(n − 2, 0) + C(n − 3, 1) + · · · + C(n − k, k − 2) + 1 = an−1 + an−2 because (n − 1)/2 = k − 1 = (n − 2)/2. A similar calculation works when n is odd. Hence, {an } satisfies the recurrence relation an = an−1 + an−2 for all positive integers n, n ≥ 2. Also, a1 = C(1, 0) = 1 and a2 = C(2, 0) + C(1, 1) = 2, which are f2 and f3 . It follows that an = fn+1 for all positive integers n. 19. an = (n2 + 3n + 5)(−1)n 21. (a1,0 + a1,1 n + a1,2 n2 + a1,3 n3 ) + (a2,0 + a2,1 n + a2,2 n2 )(−2)n + (a3,0 + a3,1 n)3n + a4,0 (−4)n 23. a) 3an−1 + 2n = 3(−2)n + 2n = 2n (−3 + 1) = −2n+1 = an b) an = α3n − 2n+1 c) an = 3n+1 − 2n+1 25. a) A = −1, B = −7 b) an = α2n − n − 7 c) an = 11 · 2n − n − 7 27. a) p3 n3 + p2 n2 + p1 n + p0 b) n2 p0 (−2)n c) n2 (p1 n + p0 )2n d) (p2 n2 + p1 n + p0 )4n e) n2 (p2 n2 + p1 n + p0 )(−2)n f) n2 (p4 n4 + p3 n3 + p2 n2 + p1 n + p0 )2n g) p0 29. a) an = α2n + 3n+1 b) an = −2 · 2n + 3n+1 31. an = α2n + β3n − n · 2n+1 + 3n/2 + 21/4 33. an = (α + βn + n2 + n3 /6)2n 35. an = −4 · 2n − n2 /4 − 5n/2 + 1/8 + (39/8)3n 37. an = n(n + 1)(n + 2)/6 39. a) 1, −1, i, −i b) an = 1 1 2+i n 2−i n n 4 − 4 (−1) + 4 i + 4 (−i) the√ formula √ 41. n a) Using √1 1− 5 n 1 1+ 5 for fn , we see that fn − √ = < 2 2 5 5 √ 1/ 5 < 1/2.√ This n means that fn is the integer clos1+ 5 est to √1 . b) Less when n is even; greater 2 5 when n is odd 43. an = fn−1 + 2fn − 1 45. a) an = 3an−1 + 4an−2 , a0 = 2, a1 = 6 b) an = [4n+1 + (−1)n ]/5 47. a) an = 2an+1 + (n − 1)10,000 b) an = 70,000 · 2n−1 − 10,000n − 10,000 49. an = 5n2 /12 + 13n/12 + 1 51. See Chapter 11, Section 5 in [Ma93]. 53. 6n · 4n−1 /n

Section 8.3 1. 14 3. The first step is (1110)2 (1010)2 = (24 + 22 )(11)2 (10)2 + 22 [(11)2 − (10)2 ][(10)2 − (10)2 ] + (22 + 1)(10)2 · (10)2 . The product is (10001100)2 . 5. C = 50, 665C + 729 = 33,979 7. a) 2 b) 4 c) 7 9. a) 79 b) 48,829 c) 30,517,579 11. O(log n) 13. O(nlog3 2 ) 15. 5 17. a) Basis step: If the sequence has just one element, then the one person on the list is the winner. Recursive step: Divide the list into two parts—the first half and the second half—as equally as possible. Apply the algorithm recursively to each half to come up with at most two

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-50

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

names. Then run through the entire list to count the number of occurrences of each of those names to decide which, if either, is the winner. b) O(n log n) 19. a) f (n) = f (n/2) + 2 b) O(log n) 21. a) 7 b) O(log n) 23. a) procedure largest sum(a1 , . . . , an ) best := 0 {empty subsequence has sum 0} for i := 1 to n sum := 0 for j := i + 1 to n sum := sum + aj if sum > best then best := sum {best is the maximum possible sum of numbers in the list} b) O(n2 ) c) We divide the list into a first half and a second half and apply the algorithm recursively to find the largest sum of consecutive terms for each half. The largest sum of consecutive terms in the entire sequence is either one of these two numbers or the sum of a sequence of consecutive terms that crosses the middle of the list. To find the largest possible sum of a sequence of consecutive terms that crosses the middle of the list, we start at the middle and move forward to find the largest possible sum in the second half of the list, and move backward to find the largest possible sum in the first half of the list; the desired sum is the sum of these two quantities. The final answer is then the largest of this sum and the two answers obtained recursively. The base case is that the largest sum of a sequence of one term is the larger of that number and 0. d) 11, 9, 14 e) S(n) = 2S(n/2) + n, C(n) = 2C(n/2) + n + 2, S(1) = 0, C(1) = 1 f) O(n log n), better than O(n2 ) 25. (1, 6) and (3, 6) at distance 2 27. The algorithm is essentially the same as the algorithm given in Example 12. The central strip still has width 2d but we need to consider just two boxes of size d × d rather than eight boxes of size (d/2)×(d/2). The recurrence relation is the same as the recurrence relation in Example 12, except that the coefficient 7 is replaced by 1. 29. With k = logb n, it j j d k follows that f (n) = a k f (1)+ k−1 j =0 a c(n/b ) = a f (1)+ k−1 d k d logb n f (1) + c(log n)nd = b j =0 cn = a f (1) + kcn = a nlogb a f (1) + cnd logb n = nd f (1) + cnd logb n. 31. Let k = logb n where n is a power of b. Basis step: If n = 1 and k = 0, then c1 nd + c2 nlogb a = c1 + c2 = bd c/ (bd − a) + f (1) + bd c/(a − bd ) = f (1). Inductive step: Assume true for k, where n = bk . Then for n = bk+1 , f (n) = af (n/b) + cnd = a{[bd c/(bd − a)](n/b)d + [f (1) + bd c/ (a − bd )] · (n/b)logb a )} + cnd = bd c/(bd − a)nd a/bd + [f (1) + bd c/(a − bd )]nlogb a + cnd = nd [ac/(bd − a) + c(bd − a)/(bd − a)] + [f (1) + bd c/(a − bd c)]nlogb a = [bd c/(bd − a)]nd + [f (1) + bd c/(a − bd )]nlogb a . 33. If a > bd , then logb a > d, so the second term dominates, giving O(nlogb a ). 35. O(nlog4 5 ) 37. O(n3 )

Section 8.4 1. f (x) = 2(x 6 − 1)/(x − 1) 3. a) f (x) = 2x(1 − x 6 )/(1 − x) b) x 3 /(1 − x) c) x/(1 − x 3 ) d) 2/(1 − 2x) e) (1+ x)7 f) 2/(1+x) g) [1/(1−x)]−x 2 h) x 3 /(1−x)2 5. a) 5/(1−x) b) 1/(1−3x) c) 2x 3 /(1−x) d) (3−x)/ (1−x)2 e) (1+x)8 7. a) a0 = −64, a1 = 144, a2 = −108, a3 = 27, and an = 0 for all n ≥ 4 b) The only nonzero coefficients are a0 = 1, a3 = 3, a6 = 3, a9 = 1. c) an = 5n d) an = (−3)n−3 for n ≥ 3, and a0 = a1 = a2 = 0 e) a0 = 8, a1 = 3, a2 = 2, an = 0 for odd n greater than 2 and an = 1 for even n greater than 2 f) an = 1 if n is a positive multiple 4, an = −1 if n < 4, and an = 0 otherwise g) an = n−1 for n ≥ 2 and a0 = a1 = 0 h) an = 2n+1 /n! 9. a) 6 b) 3 c) 9 d) 0 e) 5 11. a) 1024 b) 11 c) 66 d) 292,864 e) 20,412 13. 10 15. 50 17. 20 19. f (x) = 1/[(1 − x)(1 − x 2 ) (1 − x 5 )(1 − x 10 )] 21. 15 23. a) x 4 (1 + x + x 2 + x 3 )2 / (1 − x) b) 6 25. a) The coefficient of x r in the power series expansion of 1/[(1 − x 3 )(1 − x 4 )(1 − x 20 )] b) 1/(1 − x 3 − x 4 − x 20 ) c) 7 d) 3224 27. a) 3 b) 29 c) 29 d) 242 29. a) 10 b) 49 c) 2 d) 4 31. a) G(x) − a0 − a1 x − a2 x 2 b) G(x 2 ) c) x 4 G(x) x G(t)dt f) G(x)/(1−x) 33. ak = 2·3k −1 d) G(2x) e) 0

k 37. a = k 2 +8k +20 +(6k −18)2k 35. ak = 18·3k −12·2 k ∞ 39. Let G(x) = k=0 fk x k . After shifting indices of summation and adding series, wesee that G(x)−xG(x)−x 2 G(x) = ∞ k = f0 + (f1− f0 )x + k=2 (fk − fk−1 − fk−2 )x ∞ k 0 + x + k=2 0x . Hence, G(x) − xG(x) − x 2 G(x) = x. Solving for G(x) gives G(x) = x/(1 − x − x 2 ). By the method of partial√ fractions, it can be shown that = (1/ 5)[1/(1 − αx)√− 1/(1 − βx)], x/(1 − x − x 2 ) √ where α = (1 + 5)/2and β = (1 − 5)/2. Using the k k fact√that 1/(1 = ∞ k=0 α x , it follows √ that G(x) = ∞ − αx) (1/ 5) · k=0 (α k − β k )x k . Hence, fk = (1/ 5) · (α k − β k ). ∞ n the generating func41. a) Let G(x) = n x be n=0 C ∞ 2 tion for {Cn }. Then G(x) = n=0 ( nk=0 Ck Cn−k ) x n = ∞ n−1 ∞ n−1 . Hence, Ck Cn−1−k )x n−1 = n=1 ( k=0 n=1 Cn x ∞ 2 n 2 xG(x) = n=1 Cn x , which implies that xG(x) − G(x) + 1 = √0. Applying the quadratic formula shows that G(x) = 1± 2x1−4x . We choose the minus sign in this formula because the choice of the plus sign leads to a division 2n n by zero. b) By Exercise 40, (1 − 4x)−1/2 = ∞ n=0 n x . Integrating term by term (which is valid by a theorem cal from x 1 2n n+1 x = culus) shows that 0 (1 − 4t)−1/2 dt = ∞ n=0 n+1 n √ x ∞ 1 2n n 1− 1−4x −1/2 dt = x n=0 n+1 n x . Because 0 (1−4t) 2 = 1 2n xG(x), equating coefficients shows that Cn = n+1 n . c) Verify the basis step for n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Assume the inductive hypothesis that Cj ≥ 2j −1 for 1 ≤ j < n−1 n, where n ≥ 6. Then Cn = k=0 Ck Cn−k−1 ≥ n−2 k−1 2n−k−2 = (n − 2)2n−1 /4 ≥ C C ≥ (n − 2)2 k n−k−1 k=1 2n−1 . 43. Applying the binomial theorem to the equality = (1 + x)m (1 + x)n , shows that m+n (1 + x)m+n r=0 C(m + r C(n, r) x r = n, r)x r = m r=0 r=0 C(m, r)x · m+n r r . Comparing coeffiC (m, r − k) C (n, k) x k=0 r=0 cients gives the desired identity. 45. a) 2ex b) e−x c) e3x d) xex + ex 47. a) an = (−1)n b) an = 3 · 2n

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-51

c) an = 3n âˆ’ 3 Âˇ 2n d) an = (âˆ’2)n for n â‰Ľ 2, a1 = âˆ’3, a0 = 2 e) an = (âˆ’2)n + n! f) an = (âˆ’3)n + n! Âˇ 2n for n â‰Ľ 2, a0 = 1, a1 = âˆ’2 g) an = 0 if n is odd and an = n!/(n/2)! if n is even 49. a) an = 6anâˆ’1 + 8nâˆ’1 for n â‰Ľ 1, a0 = 1 b) The general solution of the associ(h) ated linear homogeneous recurrence relation is an = Îą6n . (p) 1 n A particular solution is an = 2 Âˇ 8 . Hence, the general solution is an = Îą6n + 21 Âˇ 8n . Using the initial condition, it followsthat Îą = 21 . Hence, an = (6n + 8n )/2. c) Let k G(x) = âˆž k=0 ak x . Using the recurrence relation for {ak }, it can be shown that G(x)âˆ’6xG(x) = (1âˆ’7x)/(1âˆ’8x). Hence, G(x) = (1 âˆ’ 7x)/[(1 âˆ’ 6x)(1 âˆ’ 8x)]. Using partial fractions, it follows that G(x) = (1/2)/(1 âˆ’ 6x) + (1/2)/(1 âˆ’ 8x). With the help of Table 1, it follows that an = (6n + 8n )/2. 1 1 1 51. 1âˆ’x Âˇ 1âˆ’x 53. (1 + x)(1 + x)2 (1 + x)3 Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ 2 Âˇ 1âˆ’x 3 Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ 55. The generating functions obtained in Exercises 52 and 53 2 1âˆ’x 4 are equal because (1 + x)(1 + x 2 )(1 + x 3 ) Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ = 1âˆ’x 1âˆ’x Âˇ 1âˆ’x 2 Âˇ 6

1âˆ’x 1 1 1 Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ = 1âˆ’x Âˇ 1âˆ’x 57. a) GX (1) = 3 Âˇ 1âˆ’x 5 Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ . 1âˆ’x 3 âˆž âˆž k P (X = k) = 1 b) GX (1) = k=0 p(X = k) Âˇ 1 = k=0 âˆž d âˆž k| kâˆ’1 | p(X = k)Âˇx = x=1 x=1 = k=0 k=0 p(X = k)ÂˇkÂˇx dx âˆž d 2 âˆž Âˇ k = E(X) c) GX (1) = dx 2 k=0 p(X = k=0 p(X = k) âˆž k| kâˆ’2 | k) Âˇ x = x=1 x=1 = k=0 p(X = k) Âˇ k(k âˆ’ 1) Âˇ x âˆž 2 2 p(X = k)Âˇ(k âˆ’k) = V (X)+E(X) âˆ’E(X). Combink=0 ing this with part (b) gives the desired results. 59. a) G(x) = pm /(1 âˆ’ qx)m b) V (x) = mq/p2

Section 8.6 1. 75 3. 6 5. 46 7. 9875 9. 540 11. 2100 13. 1854 b) 100D99 /100! c) C(100,2)/100! 15. a) D100 /100! d) 0 e) 1/100! 17. 2,170,680 19. By Exercise 18 we have Dn âˆ’ nDnâˆ’1 = âˆ’[Dnâˆ’1 âˆ’ (n âˆ’ 1)Dnâˆ’2 ]. Iterating, we have Dn âˆ’ nDnâˆ’1 = âˆ’[Dnâˆ’1 âˆ’(nâˆ’1)Dnâˆ’2 ] = âˆ’[âˆ’(Dnâˆ’2 âˆ’ (n âˆ’ 2)Dnâˆ’3 )] = Dnâˆ’2 âˆ’ (n âˆ’ 2)Dnâˆ’3 = Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ = (âˆ’1)n (D2 âˆ’ 2D1 ) = (âˆ’1)n because D2= 1 and n + D1 = 0. 21. When n is odd 23. Ď†(n) = n âˆ’ m i=1 pi m n 1 n 25. 4 1â‰¤i<j â‰¤m pi pj âˆ’Âˇ Âˇ ÂˇÂą p1 p2 ÂˇÂˇÂˇpm = n i=1 a âˆ’ pi 27. There are nm functions from a set with m elements to a set with n elements, C(n, 1)(n âˆ’ 1)m functions from a set with m elements to a set with n elements that miss exactly one element, C(n, 2)(n âˆ’ 2)m functions from a set with m elements to a set with n elements that miss exactly two elements, and so on, with C(n, n âˆ’ 1) Âˇ 1m functions from a set with m elements to a set with n elements that miss exactly nâˆ’1elements. Hence, by the principle of inclusionâ€“exclusion, there are nm âˆ’ C(n, 1)(n âˆ’ 1)m + C(n, 2)(n âˆ’ 2)m âˆ’ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ + (âˆ’1)nâˆ’1 C(n, n âˆ’ 1) Âˇ 1m onto functions.

Supplementary Exercises Section 8.5 1. a) 30 b) 29 c) 24 d) 18 3. 1% 5. a) 300 b) 150 c) 175 d) 100 7. 492 9. 974 11. 55 13. 248 15. 50,138 17. 234 19. |A1 âˆŞ A2 âˆŞ A3 âˆŞ A4 âˆŞ A5 | = |A1 | + |A2 | + |A3 | + |A4 | + |A5 | âˆ’ |A1 âˆŠ A2 | âˆ’ |A1 âˆŠ A3 | âˆ’ |A1 âˆŠ A4 | âˆ’ |A1 âˆŠ A5 | âˆ’ |A2 âˆŠ A3 | âˆ’ |A2 âˆŠ A4 | âˆ’ |A2 âˆŠ A5 | âˆ’ |A3 âˆŠ A4 | âˆ’ |A3 âˆŠ A5 | âˆ’ |A4 âˆŠ A5 |+|A1 âˆŠA2 âˆŠA3 |+|A1 âˆŠA2 âˆŠA4 |+|A1 âˆŠA2 âˆŠA5 |+|A1 âˆŠ A3 âˆŠA4 |+|A1 âˆŠA3 âˆŠA5 |+|A1 âˆŠA4 âˆŠA5 |+|A2 âˆŠA3 âˆŠA4 |+ |A2 âˆŠA3 âˆŠA5 |+|A2 âˆŠA4 âˆŠA5 |+|A3 âˆŠA4 âˆŠA5 |âˆ’|A1 âˆŠA2 âˆŠ A3 âˆŠ A4 | âˆ’ |A1 âˆŠ A2 âˆŠ A3 âˆŠ A5 | âˆ’ |A1 âˆŠ A2 âˆŠ A4 âˆŠ A5 | âˆ’ |A1 âˆŠ A3 âˆŠA4 âˆŠA5 |âˆ’|A2 âˆŠA3 âˆŠA4 âˆŠA5 |+|A1 âˆŠA2 âˆŠA3 âˆŠA4 âˆŠA5 | 21. |A1 âˆŞA2 âˆŞA3 âˆŞA4 âˆŞA5 âˆŞA6 | = |A1 |+|A2 |+|A3 |+|A4 |+ |A5 |+|A6 |âˆ’|A1 âˆŠA2 |âˆ’|A1 âˆŠA3 | âˆ’|A1 âˆŠA4 | âˆ’|A1 âˆŠA5 | âˆ’ |A1 âˆŠA6 |âˆ’|A2 âˆŠA3 |âˆ’|A2 âˆŠA4 |âˆ’|A2 âˆŠA5 |âˆ’|A2 âˆŠA6 |âˆ’|A3 âˆŠ A4 |âˆ’|A3 âˆŠA5 |âˆ’|A3 âˆŠA6 |âˆ’|A4 âˆŠA5 |âˆ’|A4 âˆŠA6 |âˆ’|A5 âˆŠA6 | 23. p(E1 âˆŞ E2 âˆŞ E3 ) = p(E1 ) + p(E2 ) + p(E3 ) âˆ’ p(E1 âˆŠ E2 ) âˆ’ p(E1 âˆŠ E3 ) âˆ’ p(E2 âˆŠ E3 ) + p(E1 âˆŠ E2 âˆŠ E3 ) 25. 4972/71,295 27. p(E1 âˆŞ E2 âˆŞ E3 âˆŞ E4 âˆŞ E5 ) = p(E1 ) + p(E2 ) + p(E3 ) + p(E4 ) + p(E5 ) âˆ’ p(E1 âˆŠ E2 ) âˆ’ p(E1 âˆŠE3 )âˆ’p(E1 âˆŠE4 )âˆ’p(E1 âˆŠE5 )âˆ’p(E2 âˆŠE3 )âˆ’p(E2 âˆŠ E4 )âˆ’p(E2 âˆŠE5 )âˆ’p(E3 âˆŠE4 )âˆ’p(E3 âˆŠE5 )âˆ’p(E4 âˆŠE5 )+ p(E1 âˆŠE2 âˆŠE3 )+p(E1 âˆŠE2 âˆŠE4 )+p(E1 âˆŠE2 âˆŠE5 )+p(E1 âˆŠ E3 âˆŠE4 )+p(E1 âˆŠE3 âˆŠE5 )+p(E1 âˆŠE4 âˆŠE5 )+p(E2 âˆŠE3 âˆŠ E4 )+P 2 âˆŠE3 âˆŠE (E 5 )+p(E2 âˆŠE4 âˆŠE 5 )+p(E3 âˆŠE4 âˆŠE5 ) n 29. p Ei = 1â‰¤iâ‰¤n p(Ei ) âˆ’ 1â‰¤i<j â‰¤n p(Ei âˆŠ Ej ) + i=1 n n+1 p 1â‰¤i<j <kâ‰¤n p(Ei âˆŠ Ej âˆŠ Ek ) âˆ’ Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ + (âˆ’1) i=1 Ei

1. a) An = 4Anâˆ’1 b) A1 = 40 c) An = 10 Âˇ 4n 3. a) Mn = Mnâˆ’1 + 160,000 b) M1 = 186,000 c) Mn = 160,000n + 26,000 d) Tn = Tnâˆ’1 + 160,000n + 26,000 e) Tn = 80,000n2 + 106,000n 5. a) an = anâˆ’2 + anâˆ’3 b) a1 = 0, a2 = 1, a3 = 1 c) a12 = 12 7. a) 2 b) 5 c) 8 d) 16 9. an = 2n 11. an = 2 + 4n/3 + n2 /2 + n3 /6 13. an = anâˆ’2 + anâˆ’3 15. a) Under the given conditions, one longest common subsequence clearly ends at the last term in each sequence, so am = bn = cp . Furthermore, a longest common subsequence of what is left of the a-sequence and the b-sequence after those last terms are deleted has to form the beginning of a longest common subsequence of the original sequences. b) If cp = am , then the longest common subsequenceâ€™s appearance in the a-sequence must terminate before the end; therefore the c-sequence must be a longest common subsequence of a1 , a2 , . . . , amâˆ’1 and b1 , b2 , . . . , bn . The other half is similar. 17. procedure howlong(a1 , . . . , am , b1 , . . . , bn : sequences) for i := 1 to m L(i, 0) := 0 for j := 1 to n L(0, j ) := 0 for i := 1 to m for j := 1 to n if ai = bj then L(i, j ) := L(i âˆ’ 1, j âˆ’ 1) + 1 else L(i, j ) := max(L(i, j âˆ’ 1), L(i âˆ’ 1, j )) return L(m, n)

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-52

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

19. f (n) = (4n2 âˆ’ 1)/3 21. O(n4 ) 23. O(n) 25. Using just two comparisons, the algorithm is able to narrow the search for m down to the first half or the second half of the original sequence. Since the length of the sequence is cut in half each time, only about 2 log2 n comparisons are needed in all. 27. a) 18n + 18 b) 18 c) 0 29. (an bn ) = an+1 bn+1 âˆ’ an bn = an+1 (bn+1 âˆ’ bn ) + bn (an+1 âˆ’ an ) = n an+1 bn + bn an 31. a) Let G(x) = âˆž n=0 an x . Then âˆž âˆž nâˆ’1 n G (x) = n=1 na = n=0 (n + 1)an+1 x . Therefore, n x n n G (x)âˆ’G(x) = âˆž n=0 x /n! = n=0 [(n+1)an+1 âˆ’an ]x = ex , as desired. That G(0) = a0 = 1 is given. b) We have [eâˆ’x G(x)] = eâˆ’x G (x)âˆ’eâˆ’x G(x) = eâˆ’x [G (x)âˆ’G(x)] = eâˆ’x Âˇ ex = 1. Hence, eâˆ’x G(x) = x + c, where c is a constant. Consequently, G(x) = xex + cex . Because G(0) = 1, it âˆž follows that c = 1. c) We have G(x) = x n+1 /n!+ n=0 âˆž n âˆž n âˆž n n=0 x /n! = n=1 x /(n âˆ’ 1)! + n=0 x /n!. Therefore, an = 1/(n âˆ’ 1)! + 1/n! for all n â‰Ľ 1, and a0 = 1. 33. 7 35. 110 37. 0 39. a) 19 b) 65 c) 122 d) 167 e) 168 41. Dnâˆ’1 /(n âˆ’ 1)! 43. 11/32

CHAPTER 9 Section 9.1 1. a) {(0, 0), (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3)} b) {(1, 3), (2, 2), (3, 1), (4, 0)} c) {(1, 0), (2, 0), (2, 1), (3, 0), (3, 1), (3, 2), (4, 0), (4, 1), (4, 2), (4, 3)} d) {(1, 0), (1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 0), (2, 2), (3, 0), (3, 3), (4, 0)} e) {(0, 1), (1, 0), (1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 1), (2, 3), (3, 1), (3, 2), (4, 1), (4, 3)} f) {(1, 2), (2, 1), (2, 2)} 3. a) Transitive b) Reflexive, symmetric, transitive c) Symmetric d) Antisymmetric e) Reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, transitive f) None of these properties 5. a) Reflexive, transitive b) Symmetric c) Symmetric d) Symmetric 7. a) Symmetric b) Symmetric, transitive c) Symmetric d) Reflexive, symmetric, transitive e) Reflexive, transitive f) Reflexive, symmetric, transitive g) Antisymmetric h) Antisymmetric, transitive 9. Each of the three properties is vacuously satisfied. 11. (c), (d), (f) 13. a) Not irreflexive b) Not irreflexive c) Not irreflexive d) Not irreflexive 15. Yes, for instance {(1, 1)} on {1, 2} 17. (a, b) âˆˆ R if and only if a is taller than b 19. (a) 21. None 23. âˆ€aâˆ€b [(a, b) âˆˆ R â†’ (b, a) âˆˆ / R] 25. 2mn 27. a) {(a, b) | b divides a} b) {(a, b) | a does not divide b} 29. The graph of f âˆ’1 31. a) {(a, b) | a is required to read or has read b} b) {(a, b) | a is required to read and has read b} c) {(a, b) | either a is required to read b but has not read it or a has read b but is not required to} d) {(a, b) | a is required to read b but has not read it} e) {(a, b) | a has read b but is not required to} 33. S â—ŚR = {(a, b) | a is a parent of b and b has a sibling}, R â—Ś S = {(a, b) | a is an aunt

or uncle of b} 35. a) R2 b) R6 c) R3 d) R3 e) âˆ… f) R1 g) R4 h) R4 37. a) R1 b) R2 c) R3 d) R2 e) R3 f) R2 g) R2 h) R2 39. b got his or her doctorate under someone who got his or her doctorate under a; there is a sequence of n + 1 people, starting with a and ending with b, such that each is the advisor of the next person in the sequence 41. a) {(a, b) | a âˆ’ b â‰Ą 0, 3, 4, 6, , 8, or 9 (mod 12)} b) {(a, b) | a â‰Ą b (mod 12)} c) {(a, b) | a âˆ’ b â‰Ą 3, 6, or 9 (mod 12)} d) {(a, b) | a âˆ’ b â‰Ą 4 or 8 (mod 12)} e) {(a, b) | a âˆ’ b â‰Ą 3, 4, 6, 8, or 9 (mod 12)} 43. 8 45. a) 65,536 b) 32,768 47. a) 2n(n+1)/2 b) 2n 3n(nâˆ’1)/2 2 c) 3n(nâˆ’1)/2 d) 2n(nâˆ’1) e) 2n(nâˆ’1)/2 f) 2n âˆ’ 2 Âˇ 2n(nâˆ’1) 49. There may be no such b. 51. If R is symmetric and (a, b) âˆˆ R, then (b, a) âˆˆ R, so (a, b) âˆˆ R âˆ’1 . Hence, R âŠ† R âˆ’1 . Similarly, R âˆ’1 âŠ† R. So R = R âˆ’1 . Conversely, if R = R âˆ’1 and (a, b) âˆˆ R, then (a, b) âˆˆ R âˆ’1 , so (b, a) âˆˆ R. Thus R is symmetric. 53. R is reflexive if and only if (a, a) âˆˆ R for all a âˆˆ A if and only if (a, a) âˆˆ R âˆ’1 [because (a, a) âˆˆ R if and only if (a, a) âˆˆ R âˆ’1 ] if and only if R âˆ’1 is reflexive. 55. Use mathematical induction. The result is trivial for n = 1. Assume R n is reflexive and transitive. By Theorem 1, R n+1 âŠ† R. To see that R âŠ† R n+1 = R n â—Ś R, let (a, b) âˆˆ R. By the inductive hypothesis, R n = R and hence, is reflexive. Thus (b, b) âˆˆ R n . Therefore (a, b) âˆˆ R n+1 . 57. Use mathematical induction. The result is trivial for n = 1. Assume R n is reflexive. Then (a, a) âˆˆ R n for all a âˆˆ A and (a, a) âˆˆ R. Thus (a, a) âˆˆ R n â—Ś R = R n+1 for all a âˆˆ A. 59. No, for instance, take R = {(1, 2), (2, 1)}.

Section 9.2 1. {(1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 4), (2, 3, 4)} 3. (Nadir, 122, 34, Detroit, 08:10), (Acme, 221, 22, Denver, 08:17), (Acme, 122, 33, Anchorage, 08:22), (Acme, 323, 34, Honolulu 08:30), (Nadir, 199, 13, Detroit, 08:47), (Acme, 222, 22, Denver, 09:10), (Nadir, 322, 34, Detroit, 09:44) 5. Airline and flight number, airline and departure time 7. a) Yes b) No c) No 9. a) Social Security number b) There are no two people with the same name who happen to have the same street address. c) There are no two people with the same name living together. 11. (Nadir, 122, 34, Detroit, 08 : 10), (Nadir, 199, 13, Detroit, 08 : 47), (Nadir, 322, 34, Detroit, 09 : 44) 13. (Nadir, 122, 34, Detroit, 08 : 10), (Nadir, 199, 13, Detroit, 08 : 47), (Nadir, 322, 34, Detroit, 09 : 44), (Acme, 221, 22, Denver, 08 : 17), (Acme, 222, 22, Denver, 09 : 10) 15. P3.5.6 17. Airline Nadir Acme Acme Acme

Destination Detroit Denver Anchorage Honolulu

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-53

19. Supplier

Part_ number

Project

Quantity

Color_ code

23 23 23 31 31 32 32 33

1092 1101 9048 4975 3477 6984 9191 1001

1 3 4 3 2 4 2 1

2 1 12 6 25 10 80 14

2 1 2 2 2 1 4 8

21. Both sides of this equation pick out the subset of R consisting of those n-tuples satisfying both conditions C1 and C2 . 23. Both sides of this equation pick out the set of n-tuples that are in R, are in S, and satisfy condition C. 25. Both sides of this equation pick out the m-tuples consisting of i1 th, i2 th, . . . , im th components of n-tuples in either R or S. 27. Let R = {(a, b)} and S = {(a, c)}, n = 2, m = 1, and i1 = 1; P1 (R − S) = {(a)}, but P1 (R) − P1 (S) = ∅. 29. a) J2 followed by P1,3 b) (23, 1), (23, 3), (31, 3), (32, 4) 31. There is no primary key.

Section 9.3 1. a)

⎡

1 ⎣0 0 ⎡ c) 1 ⎣0 0

1 0 0 1 1 0

⎤ ⎡ 1 b) 0 ⎣1 0⎦ 0 0 ⎤ ⎡ 1 d) 0 ⎣0 1⎦ 1 1

1 1 0 0 0 0

⎤ 0 0⎦ 1 ⎤ 1 0⎦ 0

0 1 1

⎤ ⎡ 1 b) 1 ⎣0 0⎦ 1 1

1 1 1

1

4

2

3

d)

1

4

2

3

21. For simplicity we have indicated pairs of edges between the same two vertices in opposite directions by using a double arrowhead, rather than drawing two separate lines. b)

a) 1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

c) 1

2

3

4

23. {(a, b), (a, c), (b, c), (c, b)} 25. (a, c), (b, a), (c, d), (d, b) 27. {(a, a), (a, b), (a, c), (b, a), (b, b), (b, c), (c, a), (c, b), (d, d)} 29. The relation is asymmetric if and only if the directed graph has no loops and no closed paths of length 2. 31. Exercise 23: irreflexive. Exercise 24: reflexive, antisymmetric, transitive. Exercise 25: irreflexive, antisymmetric. 33. Reverse the direction on every edge in the digraph for R. 35. Proof by mathematical induction. Basis step: Trivial for n = 1. Inductive step: Assume true for k. Because R k+1 = R k ◦ R, its matrix is MR MR k . By the [k] [k+1] inductive hypothesis this is MR MR = MR .

5.

⎤ ⎡ 0 c) 0 ⎣1 1⎦ 1 1

1 1 1

⎤ 1 1⎦ 1

a

b

c

d

9. a)

11. a)

c)

b

a

7.

c

a

b

c

d

b)

d b

a

c

a

b

c

d

a

b

c

d

b)

c)

d

a

b

c

d

a

b

c

d

b) 1

2

4

1. a) {(0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 1), (1, 2), (2, 0), (2, 2), (3, 0), (3, 3)} b) {(0, 1), (0, 2), (0, 3), (1, 0), (1, 1), (1, 2), (2, 0), (2, 1), (2, 2), (3, 0)} 3. {(a, b) | a divides b or b divides a}

17. n2 − k 19. a)

1

Section 9.4

3. a) (1, 1), (1, 3), (2, 2), (3, 1), (3, 3) b) (1, 2), (2, 2), (3, 2) c) (1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 1), (2, 3), (3, 1), (3, 2), (3, 3) 5. The relation is irreflexive if and only if the main diagonal of the matrix contains only 0s. 7. a) Reflexive, symmetric, transitive b) Antisymmetric, transitive c) Symmetric 9. a) 4950 b) 9900 c) 99 d) 100 e) 1 11. Change each 0 to a 1 and each 1 to a 0. ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ 13. a) 0 1 1 b) 1 0 0 c) 1 1 1 ⎣1 1 0 ⎦ ⎣0 0 1⎦ ⎣1 1 1⎦ 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 ⎡ 15. a) 0 ⎣1 0

c)

4

3 2

3

13. The symmetric closure of R is R ∪ R −1 . MR∪R −1 = t . 15. Only when R is irreflexive, MR ∨ MR −1 = MR ∨ MR

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-54

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

in which case it is its own closure. 17. a, a, a, a; a, b, e, a; a, d, e, a; b, c, c, b; b, e, a, b; c, b, c, c; c, c, b, c; c, c, c, c; d, e, a, d; d, e, e, d; e, a, b, e; e, a, d, e; e, d, e, e; e, e, d, e; e, e, e, e 19. a) {(1, 1), (1, 5), (2, 3), (3, 1), (3, 2), (3, 3), (3, 4), (4, 1), (4, 5), (5, 3), (5, 4)} b) {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4), (2, 1), (2, 5), (3, 1), (3, 3), (3, 4), (3, 5), (4, 1), (4, 2), (4, 3), (4, 4), (5, 1), (5, 3), (5, 5)} c) {(1, 1), (1, 3), (1, 4), (1, 5), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3), (2, 4), (3, 1), (3, 2), (3, 3), (3, 4), (3, 5), (4, 1), (4, 3), (4, 4), (4, 5), (5, 1), (5, 2), (5, 3), (5, 4), (5, 5)} d) {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4), (1, 5), (2, 1), (2, 3), (2, 4), (2, 5), (3, 1), (3, 2), (3, 3), (3, 4), (3, 5), (4, 1), (4, 2), (4, 3), (4, 4), (4, 5), (5, 1), (5, 2), (5, 3), (5, 4), (5, 5)} e) {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4), (1, 5), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3), (2, 4), (2, 5), (3, 1), (3, 2), (3, 3), (3, 4), (3, 5), (4, 1), (4, 2), (4, 3), (4, 4), (4, 5), (5, 1), (5, 2), (5, 3), (5, 4), (5, 5)} f) {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4), (1, 5), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3), (2, 4), (2, 5), (3, 1), (3, 2), (3, 3), (3, 4), (3, 5), (4, 1), (4, 2), (4, 3), (4, 4), (4, 5), (5, 1), (5, 2), (5, 3), (5, 4), (5, 5)} 21. a) If there is a student c who shares a class with a and a class with b b) If there are two students c and d such that a and c share a class, c and d share a class, and d and b share a class c) If there is a sequence s0 , . . . , sn of students with n ≥ 1 such that s0 = a, sn = b, and for each i = 1, 2, . . . , n, si and si−1 sharea class 23. The result follows from (R ∗ )−1 = ∞ ∞ ∞ n −1 = n −1 = n ∗ n=1 R n=1 (R ) n=1 R = R . ⎡ 25. a) 1 ⎢1 ⎢ ⎣1 1

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1

⎤ ⎡ 1 b) 0 ⎢1 1⎥ ⎥ ⎢ ⎦ ⎣1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0

0 1 1 1

⎤ 0 1⎥ ⎥ 1⎦ 1

⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ c) 0 1 1 1 d) 1 1 1 1 ⎢1 1 1 1⎥ ⎢0 0 1 1⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣1 1 1 1⎦ ⎣0 0 0 1⎦ 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 27. Answers same as for Exercise 25. 29. a) {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 4), (2, 2), (3, 3), (4, 1), (4, 2), (4, 4)} b) {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 4), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 4), (3, 3), (4, 1), (4, 2), (4, 4)} c) {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 4), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 4), (3, 3), (4, 1), (4, 2), (4, 4)} 31. Algorithm 1: O(n3.8 ); Algorithm 2: O(n3 ) 33. Initialize with A := MR ∨ In and loop only for i := 2 to n − 1. 35. a) Because R is reflexive, every relation containing it must also be reflexive. b) Both {(0, 0), (0, 1), (0, 2), (1, 1), (2, 2)} and {(0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 0), (1, 1), (2, 2)} contain R and have an odd number of elements, but neither is a subset of the other.

Section 9.5 1. a) Equivalence relation b) Not reflexive, not transitive c) Equivalence relation d) Not transitive e) Not symme- tric, not transitive 3. a) Equivalence relation b) Not transitive c) Not reflexive, not symmetric, not transitive d) Equivalence relation e) Not reflexive, not transitive 5. Many answers are possible. (1) Two buildings are equivalent if they were

opened during the same year; an equivalence class consists of the set of buildings opened in a given year (as long as there was at least one building opened that year). (2) Two buildings are equivalent if they have the same number of stories; the equivalence classes are the set of 1-story buildings, the set of 2-story buildings, and so on (one class for each n for which there is at least one n-story building). (3) Every building in which you have a class is equivalent to every building in which you have a class (including itself), and every building in which you don’t have a class is equivalent to every building in which you don’t have a class (including itself); there are two equivalence classes—the set of buildings in which you have a class and the set of buildings in which you don’t have a class (assuming these are nonempty). 7. The statement “p is equivalent to q" means that p and q have the same entries in their truth tables. R is reflexive, because p has the same truth table as p. R is symmetric, for if p and q have the same truth table, then q and p have the same truth table. If p and q have the same entries in their truth tables and q and r have the same entries in their truth tables, then p and r also do, so R is transitive. The equivalence class of T is the set of all tautologies; the equivalence class of F is the set of all contradictions. 9. a) (x, x) ∈ R because f (x) = f (x). Hence, R is reflexive. (x, y) ∈ R if and only if f (x) = f (y), which holds if and only if f (y) = f (x) if and only if (y, x) ∈ R. Hence, R is symmetric. If (x, y) ∈ R and (y, z) ∈ R, then f (x) = f (y) and f (y) = f (z). Hence, f (x) = f (z). Thus, (x, z) ∈ R. It follows that R is transitive. b) The sets f −1 (b) for b in the range of f 11. Let x be a bit string of length 3 or more. Because x agrees with itself in the first three bits, (x, x) ∈ R. Hence, R is reflexive. Suppose that (x, y) ∈ R. Then x and y agree in the first three bits. Hence, y and x agree in the first three bits. Thus, (y, x) ∈ R. If (x, y) and (y, z) are in R, then x and y agree in the first three bits, as do y and z. Hence, x and z agree in the first three bits. Hence, (x, z) ∈ R. It follows that R is transitive. 13. This follows from Exercise 9, where f is the function that takes a bit string of length 3 or more to the ordered pair with its first bit as the first component and the third bit as its second component. 15. For reflexivity, ((a, b), (a, b)) ∈ R because a + b = b + a. For symmetry, if ((a, b), (c, d)) ∈ R, then a + d = b + c, so c + b = d + a, so ((c, d), (a, b)) ∈ R. For transitivity, if ((a, b), (c, d)) ∈ R and ((c, d), (e, f )) ∈ R, then a +d = b+c and c+e = d +f , so a + d + c + e = b + c + d + f , so a + e = b + f , so ((a, b), (e, f )) ∈ R. An easier solution is to note that by algebra, the given condition is the same as the condition that f ((a, b)) = f ((c, d)), where f ((x, y)) = x − y; therefore by Exercise 9 this is an equivalence relation. 17. a) This follows from Exercise 9, where the function f from the set of differentiable functions (from R to R) to the set of functions (from R to R) is the differentiation operator. b) The set of all functions of the form g(x) = x 2 + C for some constant C 19. This follows from Exercise 9, where the function f from the set of all URLs to the set of all Web pages is the function that assigns to each URL the Web page for that URL. 21. No 23. No 25. R is reflexive because a bit string s

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-55

has the same number of 1s as itself. R is symmetric because s and t having the same number of 1s implies that t and s do. R is transitive because s and t having the same number of 1s, and t and u having the same number of 1s implies that s and u have the same number of 1s. 27. a) The sets of people of the same age b) The sets of people with the same two parents 29. The set of all bit strings with exactly two 1s. 31. a) The set of all bit strings of length 3 b) The set of all bit strings of length 4 that end with a 1 c) The set of all bit strings of length 5 that end 11 d) The set of all bit strings of length 8 that end 10101 33. Each of the 15 bit strings of length less than four is in an equivalence class by itself: [λ]R4 = {λ}, [0]R4 = {0}, [1]R4 = {1}, [00]R4 = {00}, [01]R4 = {01}, …, [111]R4 = {111}. The remaining 16 equivalence classes are determined by the bit strings of length 4: [0000]R4 = {0000, 00000, 00001, 000000, 000001, 000010, 000011, 0000000, . . .}, [0001]R4 = {0001, 00010, 00011, 000100, 000101, 000110, 000111, 0001000, . . .}, …, [1111]R4 = {1111, 11110, 11111, 111100, 111101, 111110, 111111, 1111000, . . .} 35. a) [2]5 = {i | i≡2 (mod 5)} = {. . . , −8, −3, 2, 7, 12, . . .} b) [3]5 = {i | i ≡ 3 (mod 5)} = {. . . , −7, −2, 3, 8, 13, . . .} c) [6]5 = {i | i ≡ 6 (mod 5)} = {. . . , −9, −4, 1, 6, 11, . . .} d) [−3]5 = {i | i ≡ −3 (mod 5)} = {. . . , −8, −3, 2, 7, 12, . . .} 37. {6n + k | n ∈ Z} for k ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5} 39. a) [(1, 2)] = {(a, b) | a − b = −1} = {(1, 2), (3, 4), (4, 5), (5, 6), . . .} b) Each equivalence class can be interpreted as an integer (negative, positive, or zero); specifically, [(a, b)] can be interpreted as a − b. 41. a) No b) Yes c) Yes d) No 43. (a), (c), (e) 45. (b), (d), (e) 47. a) {(0, 0), (1, 1), (1, 2), (2, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), (3, 4), (3, 5), (4, 3), (4, 4), (4, 5), (5, 3), (5, 4), (5, 5)} b) {(0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 0), (1, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3), (3, 2), (3, 3), (4, 4), (4, 5), (5, 4), (5, 5)} c) {(0, 0), (0, 1), (0, 2), (1, 0), (1, 1), (1, 2), (2, 0), (2, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), (3, 4), (3, 5), (4, 3), (4, 4), (4, 5), (5, 3), (5, 4), (5, 5)} d) {(0, 0), (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), (4, 4), (5, 5)} 49. [0]6 ⊆ [0]3 , [1]6 ⊆ [1]3 , [2]6 ⊆ [2]3 , [3]6 ⊆ [0]3 , [4]6 ⊆ [1]3 , [5]6 ⊆ [2]3 51. Let A be a set in the first partition. Pick a particular element x of A. The set of all bit strings of length 16 that agree with x on the last four bits is one of the sets in the second partition, and clearly every string in A is in that set. 53. We claim that each equivalence class [x]R31 is a subset of the equivalence class [x]R8 . To show this, choose an arbitrary element y ∈ [x]R31 . Then y is equivalent to x under R31 , so either y = x or y and x are each at least 31 characters long and agree on their first 31 characters. Because strings that are at least 31 characters long and agree on their first 31 characters perforce are at least 8 characters long and agree on their first 8 characters, we know that either y = x or y and x are each at least 8 characters long and agree on their first 8 characters. This means that y is equivalent to x under R8 , so y ∈ [x]R8 . 55. {(a, a), (a, b), (a, c), (b, a), (b, b), (b, c), (c, a), (c, b), (c, c), (d, d), (d, e), (e, d), (e, e)} 57. a) Z b) {n + 21 | n ∈ Z} 59. a) R is reflexive because any coloring can be obtained from itself via a 360-degree rotation. To see that R is symmetric and transitive, use the fact that each rotation is the composition of

two reflections and conversely the composition of two reflections is a rotation. Hence, (C1 , C2 ) belongs to R if and only if C2 can be obtained from C1 by a composition of reflections. So if (C1 , C2 ) belongs to R, so does (C2 , C1 ) because the inverse of the composition of reflections is also a composition of reflections (in the opposite order). Hence, R is symmetric. To see that R is transitive, suppose (C1 , C2 ) and (C2 , C3 ) belong to R. Taking the composition of the reflections in each case yields a composition of reflections, showing that (C1 , C3 ) belongs to R. b) We express colorings with sequences of length four, with r and b denoting red and blue, respectively. We list letters denoting the colors of the upper left square, upper right square, lower left square, and lower right square, in that order. The equivalence classes are: {rrrr}, {bbbb}, {rrrb, rrbr, rbrr, brrr}, {bbbr, bbrb, brbb, rbbb}, {rbbr, brrb}, {rrbb, brbr, bbrr, rbrb}. 61. 5 63. Yes 65. R 67. First form the reflexive closure of R, then form the symmetric closure of the reflexive closure, and finally form the transitive closure of the symmetric closure of the reflexive closure. 69. p(0) = 1, p(1) = 1, p(2) = 2, p(3) = 5, p(4) = 15, p(5) = 52, p(6) = 203, p(7) = 877, p(8) = 4140, p(9) = 21147, p(10) = 115975

Section 9.6 1. a) Is a partial ordering b) Not antisymmetric, not transitive c) Is a partial ordering d) Is a partial ordering e) Not antisymmetric, not transitive 3. a) No b) No c) Yes 5. a) Yes b) No c) Yes d) No 7. a) No b) Yes c) No 9. No 11. Yes 13. a) {(0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 1), (2, 0), (2, 1), (2, 2)} b) (Z, ≤) c) (P (Z), ⊆) d) (Z+ , “is a multiple of”) 15. a) {0} and {1}, for instance b) 4 and 6, for instance 17. a) (1, 1, 2) < (1, 2, 1) b) (0, 1, 2, 3) < (0, 1, 3, 2) c) (0, 1, 1, 1, 0) < (1, 0, 1, 0, 1) 19. 0 < 0001 < 001 < 01 < 010 < 0101 < 011 < 11 21. 15 11 10 5 2 0

23. a) 8 4 2

b) 2

3

5

7

6 5

3

7

1

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

1

11

13

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-56

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

c)

d) 64

48 36

24

16

12

2 1

32

6

8

3

4 2 1

25. (a, b), (a, c), (a, d), (b, c), (b, d), (a, a), (b, b), (c, c), (d, d) 27. (a, a), (a, g), (a, d), (a, e), (a, f ), (b, b), (b, g), (b, d), (b, e), (b, f ), (c, c), (c, g), (c, d), (c, e), (c, f ), (g, d), (g, e), (g, f ), (g, g), (d, d), (e, e), (f, f ) 29. (âˆ…, {a}), (âˆ…, {b}), (âˆ…, {c}), ({a}, {a, b}), ({a}, {a, c}), ({b}, {a, b}), ({b}, {b, c}), ({c}, {a, c}), ({c}, {b, c}), ({a, b}, {a, b, c}), ({a, c}, {a, b, c})({b, c}, {a, b, c}) 31. Let (S, ) be a finite poset. We will show that this poset is the reflexive transitive closure of its covering relation. Suppose that (a, b) is in the reflexive transitive closure of the covering relation. Then a = b or a â‰ş b, so a b, or else there is a sequence a1 , a2 , . . . , an such that a â‰ş a1 â‰ş a2 â‰ş Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ â‰ş an â‰ş b, in which case again a b by the transitivity of . Conversely, suppose that a â‰ş b. If a = b then (a, b) is in the reflexive transitive closure of the covering relation. If a â‰ş b and there is no z such that a â‰ş z â‰ş b, then (a, b) is in the covering relation and therefore in its reflexive transitive closure. Otherwise, let a â‰ş a1 â‰ş a2 â‰ş Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ â‰ş an â‰ş b be a longest possible sequence of this form (which exists because the poset is finite). Then no intermediate elements can be inserted, so each pair (a, a1 ), (a1 , a2 ), . . . , (an , b) is in the covering relation, so again (a, b) is in its reflexive transitive closure. 33. a) 24, 45 b) 3, 5 c) No d) No e) 15, 45 f) 15 g) 15, 5, 3 h) 15 35. a) {1, 2}, {1, 3, 4}, {2, 3, 4} b) {1}, {2}, {4} c) No d) No e) {2, 4}, {2, 3, 4} f) {2, 4} g) {3, 4}, {4} h) {3, 4} 37. Because (a, b) (a, b), is reflexive. If (a1 , a2 ) (b1 , b2 ) and (a1 , a2 ) = (b1 , b2 ), either a1 â‰ş b1 , or a1 = b1 and a2 â‰ş b2 . In either case, (b1 , b2 ) is not less than or equal to (a1 , a2 ). Hence, is antisymmetric. Suppose that (a1 , a2 ) â‰ş (b1 , b2 ) â‰ş (c1 , c2 ). Then if a1 â‰ş b1 or b1 â‰ş c1 , we have a1 â‰ş c1 , so (a1 , a2 ) â‰ş (c1 , c2 ), but if a1 = b1 = c1 , then a2 â‰ş b2 â‰ş c2 , which implies that (a1 , a2 ) â‰ş (c1 , c2 ). Hence, is transitive. 39. Because (s, t) (s, t), is reflexive. If (s, t) (u, v) and (u, v) (s, t), then s u s and t v t; hence, s = u and t = v. Hence, is antisymmetric. Suppose that (s, t) (u, v) (w, x). Then s u, t v, u w, and v x. It follows that s w and t x. Hence, (s, t) (w, x). Hence, is transitive. 41. a) Suppose that x is maximal and that y is the largest element. Then x y. Because x is not less than y, it follows that x = y. By Exercise 40(a) y is unique. Hence, x is unique. b) Suppose that x is minimal and that y is the smallest element. Then x y. Because x is not greater than y, it

follows that x = y. By Exercise 40(b) y is unique. Hence, x is unique. 43. a) Yes b) No c) Yes 45. Use mathematical induction. Let P (n) be â€œEvery subset with n elements from a lattice has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound.â€? Basis step: P (1) is true because the least upper bound and greatest lower bound of {x} are both x. Inductive step: Assume that P (k) is true. Let S be a set with k + 1 elements. Let x âˆˆ S and S = S âˆ’ {x}. Because S has k elements, by the inductive hypothesis, it has a least upper bound y and a greatest lower bound a. Now because we are in a lattice, there are elements z = lub(x, y) and b = glb(x, a). We are done if we can show that z is the least upper bound of S and b is the greatest lower bound of S. To show that z is the least upper bound of S, first note that if w âˆˆ S, then w = x or w âˆˆ S . If w = x then w z because z is the least upper bound of x and y. If w âˆˆ S , then w z because w y, which is true because y is the least upper bound of S , and y z, which is true because z = lub(x, y). To see that z is the least upper bound of S, suppose that u is an upper bound of S. Note that such an element u must be an upper bound of x and y, but because z = lub(x, y), it follows that z u. We omit the similar argument that b is the greatest lower bound of S. 47. a) No b) Yes c) (Proprietary, {Cheetah, Puma}), (Restricted, {Cheetah, Puma}), (Registered, {Cheetah, Puma}), (Proprietary, {Cheetah, Puma, Impala}), (Restricted, {Cheetah, Puma, Impala}), (Registered, {Cheetah, Puma, Impala}) d) (Non- proprietary, {Impala, Puma}), (Proprietary, {Impala, Puma}), (Restricted, {Impala, Puma}), (Nonproprietary, {Impala}), (Proprietary, {Impala}), (Restricted, {Impala}), (Nonproprietary, {Puma}), (Proprietary, {Puma}), (Restricted, {Puma}), (Nonproprietary, âˆ…), (Proprietary, âˆ…), (Restricted, âˆ…) 49. Let be the set of all partitions of a set S with P1 P2 if P1 is a refinement of P2 , that is, if every set in P1 is a subset of a set in P2 . First, we show that ( , ) is a poset. Because P P for every partition P , is reflexive. Now suppose that P1 P2 and P2 P1 . Let T âˆˆ P1 . Because P1 P2 , there is a set T âˆˆ P2 such that T âŠ† T . Because P2 P1 there is a set T âˆˆ P1 such that T âŠ† T . It follows that T âŠ† T . But because P1 is a partition, T = T , which implies that T = T because T âŠ† T âŠ† T . Thus, T âˆˆ P2 . By reversing the roles of P1 and P2 it follows that every set in P2 is also in P1 . Hence, P1 = P2 and is antisymmetric. Next, suppose that P1 P2 and P2 P3 . Let T âˆˆ P1 . Then there is a set T âˆˆ P2 such that T âŠ† T . Because P2 P3 there is a set T âˆˆ P3 such that T âŠ† T . This means that T âŠ† T . Hence, P1 P3 . It follows that is transitive. The greatest lower bound of the partitions P1 and P2 is the partition P whose subsets are the nonempty sets of the form T1 âˆŠ T2 where T1 âˆˆ P1 and T2 âˆˆ P2 . We omit the justification of this statement here. The least upper bound of the partitions P1 and P2 is the partition that corresponds to the equivalence relation in which x âˆˆ S is related to y âˆˆ S if there is a sequence x = x0 , x1 , x2 , . . . , xn = y for some nonnegative integer n such that for each i from 1 to n, xiâˆ’1 and xi are in the same element of P1 or of P2 . We omit the details that this is an equivalence relation and the details of the proof that this is

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-57

the least upper bound of the two partitions. 51. By Exercise 45 there is a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound for the entire finite lattice. By definition these elements are the greatest and least elements, respectively. 53. The least element of a subset of Z+ Ă— Z+ is that pair that has the smallest possible first coordinate, and, if there is more than one such pair, that pair among those that has the smallest second coordinate. 55. If x is an integer in a decreasing sequence of elements of this poset, then at most |x| elements can follow x in the sequence, namely, integers whose absolute values are |x| âˆ’ 1, |x| âˆ’ 2, â€Ś, 1, 0. Therefore there can be no infinite decreasing sequence. This is not a totally ordered set, because 5 and âˆ’5, for example, are incomparable. 57. To find which of two rational numbers is larger, write them with a positive common denominator and compare numerators. To show that this set is dense, suppose that x < y are two rational numbers. Then their average, i.e., (x + y)/2, is a rational number between them. 59. Let (S, ) be a partially ordered set. It is enough to show that every nonempty subset of S contains a least element if and only if there is no infinite decreasing sequence of elements a1 , a2 , a3 , . . . in S (i.e., where ai+1 â‰ş ai for all i). An infinite decreasing sequence of elements clearly has no least element. Conversely, let A be any nonempty subset of S that has no least element. Because A is nonempty, choose a1 âˆˆ A. Because a1 is not the least element of A, choose a2 âˆˆ A with a2 â‰ş a1 . Because a2 is not the least element of A, choose a3 âˆˆ A with a3 â‰ş a2 . Continue in this manner, producing an infinite decreasing sequence in S. 61. a â‰şt b â‰şt c â‰şt d â‰şt e â‰şt f â‰şt g â‰şt h â‰şt i â‰şt j â‰şt k â‰şt l â‰şt m 63. 1 â‰ş 5 â‰ş 2 â‰ş 4 â‰ş 12 â‰ş 20, 1 â‰ş 2 â‰ş 5 â‰ş 4 â‰ş 12 â‰ş 20, 1 â‰ş 2 â‰ş 4 â‰ş 5 â‰ş 12 â‰ş 20, 1 â‰ş 2 â‰ş 4 â‰ş 12 â‰ş 5 â‰ş 20, 1 â‰ş 5 â‰ş 2 â‰ş 4 â‰ş 20 â‰ş 12, 1 â‰ş 2 â‰ş 5 â‰ş 4 â‰ş 20 â‰ş 12, 1 â‰ş 2 â‰ş 4 â‰ş 5 â‰ş 20 â‰ş 12 65. A â‰ş C â‰ş E â‰ş B â‰ş D â‰ş F â‰ş G, A â‰ş E â‰ş C â‰ş B â‰ş D â‰ş F â‰ş G, C â‰ş A â‰ş E â‰ş B â‰ş D â‰ş F â‰ş G, C â‰ş E â‰ş A â‰ş B â‰ş D â‰ş F â‰ş G, E â‰ş A â‰ş C â‰ş B â‰ş D â‰ş F â‰ş G, E â‰ş C â‰ş A â‰ş B â‰ş D â‰ş F â‰ş G, A â‰ş C â‰ş B â‰ş E â‰ş D â‰ş F â‰ş G, C â‰ş A â‰ş B â‰ş E â‰ş D â‰ş F â‰ş G, A â‰ş C â‰ş B â‰ş D â‰ş E â‰ş F â‰ş G, C â‰ş A â‰ş B â‰ş D â‰ş E â‰ş F â‰ş G, A â‰ş C â‰ş E â‰ş B â‰ş F â‰ş D â‰ş G, A â‰ş E â‰ş C â‰ş B â‰ş F â‰ş D â‰ş G, C â‰ş A â‰ş E â‰ş B â‰ş F â‰ş D â‰ş G, C â‰ş E â‰ş A â‰ş B â‰ş F â‰ş D â‰ş G, E â‰ş A â‰ş C â‰ş B â‰ş F â‰ş D â‰ş G, E â‰ş C â‰ş A â‰ş B â‰ş F â‰ş D â‰ş G, A â‰ş C â‰ş B â‰ş E â‰ş F â‰ş D â‰ş G, C â‰ş A â‰ş B â‰ş E â‰ş F â‰ş D â‰ş G 67. Determine user needs â‰ş Write functional requirements â‰ş Set up test sites â‰ş Develop system requirements â‰ş Write documentation â‰ş Develop module A â‰ş Develop module B â‰ş Develop module C â‰ş Integrate modules â‰ş Îą test â‰ş Î˛ test â‰ş Completion

Supplementary Exercises 1. a) Irreflexive (we do not include the empty string), symmetric b) Irreflexive, symmetric c) Irreflexive, antisymmetric,

transitive 3. ((a, b), (a, b)) âˆˆ R because a + b = a + b. Hence, R is reflexive. If ((a, b), (c, d)) âˆˆ R then a+d = b+c, so that c + b = d + a. It follows that ((c, d), (a, b)) âˆˆ R. Hence, R is symmetric. Suppose that ((a, b), (c, d)) and ((c, d), (e, f )) belong to R. Then a + d = b + c and c + f = d + e. Adding these two equations and subtracting c + d from both sides gives a + f = b + e. Hence, ((a, b), (e, f )) belongs to R. Hence, R is transitive. 5. Suppose that (a, b) âˆˆ R. Because (b, b) âˆˆ R it follows that (a, b) âˆˆ R 2 . 7. Yes, yes 9. Yes, yes 11. Two records with identical keys in the projection would have identical keys in the original. 13. ( âˆŞ R)âˆ’1 = âˆ’1 âˆŞ R âˆ’1 = âˆŞ R âˆ’1 15. a) R = {(a, b), (a, c)}. The transitive closure of the symmetric closure of R is {(a, a), (a, b), (a, c), (b, a), (b, b), (b, c), (c, a), (c, b), (c, c)} and is different from the symmetric closure of the transitive closure of R, which is {(a, b), (a, c), (b, a), (c, a)}. b) Suppose that (a, b) is in the symmetric closure of the transitive closure of R. We must show that (a, b) is in the transitive closure of the symmetric closure of R. We know that at least one of (a, b) and (b, a) is in the transitive closure of R. Hence, there is either a path from a to b in R or a path from b to a in R (or both). In the former case, there is a path from a to b in the symmetric closure of R. In the latter case, we can form a path from a to b in the symmetric closure of R by reversing the directions of all the edges in a path from b to a, going backward. Hence, (a, b) is in the transitive closure of the symmetric closure of R. 17. The closure of S with respect to property P is a relation with property P that contains R because R âŠ† S. Hence, the closure of S with respect to property P contains the closure of R with respect to property P. 19. Use the basic idea of [k] Warshallâ€™s algorithm, except let wij equal the length of the longest path from vi to vj using interior vertices with subscripts not exceeding k, and equal to âˆ’1 if there is no such [k] path. To find wij from the entries of Wkâˆ’1 , determine for each pair (i, j ) whether there are paths from vi to vk and from vk [kâˆ’1] to vj using no vertices labeled greater than k. If either wik [kâˆ’1] or wkj is âˆ’1, then such a pair of paths does not exist, so

[k] [kâˆ’1] set wij = wij . If such a pair of paths exists, then there are [kâˆ’1] two possibilities. If wkk > 0, there are paths of arbitrary [k] [kâˆ’1] long length from vi to vj , so set wij = âˆž. If wkk = 0, [kâˆ’1] [kâˆ’1] [kâˆ’1] [kâˆ’1] set wij = max(wij , wik + wkj ). (Initially take W0 = MR .) 21. 25 23. Because Ai âˆŠ Bj is a subset of Ai and of Bj , the collection of subsets is a refinement of each of the given partitions. We must show that it is a partition. By construction, each of these sets is nonempty. To see that their union is S, suppose that s âˆˆ S. Because P1 and P2 are partitions of S, there are sets Ai and Bj such that s âˆˆ Ai and s âˆˆ Bj . Therefore s âˆˆ Ai âˆŠ Bj . Hence, the union of these sets is S. To see that they are pairwise disjoint, note that unless i = i and j = j , (Ai âˆŠBj )âˆŠ(Ai âˆŠBj ) = (Ai âˆŠAi )âˆŠ(Bj âˆŠBj ) = âˆ…. 25. The subset relation is a partial ordering on any collection of sets, because it is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive. Here the collection of sets is R(S). 27. Find recipe â‰ş Buy

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-58

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

seafood ≺ Buy groceries ≺ Wash shellfish ≺ Cut ginger and garlic ≺ Clean fish ≺ Steam rice ≺ Cut fish ≺ Wash vegetables ≺ Chop water chestnuts ≺ Make garnishes ≺ Cook in wok ≺ Arrange on platter ≺ Serve 29. a) The only antichain with more than one element is {c, d}. b) The only antichains with more than one element are {b, c}, {c, e}, and {d, e}. c) The only antichains with more than one element are {a, b}, {a, c}, {b, c}, {a, b, c}, {d, e}, {d, f }, {e, f }, and {d, e, f }. 31. Let (S, ) be a finite poset, and let A be a maximal chain. Because (A, ) is also a poset it must have a minimal element m. Suppose that m is not minimal in S. Then there would be an element a of S with a ≺ m. However, this would make the set A ∪ {a} a larger chain than A. To show this, we must show that a is comparable with every element of A. Because m is comparable with every element of A and m is minimal, it follows that m ≺ x when x is in A and x = m. Because a ≺ m and m ≺ x, the transitive law shows that a ≺ x for every element of A. 33. Let aRb denote that a is a descendant of b. By Exercise 32, if no set of n + 1 people none of whom is a descendant of any other (an antichain) exists, then k ≤ n, so the set can be partitioned into k ≤ n chains. By the pigeonhole principle, at least one of these chains contains at least m+1 people. 35. We prove by contradiction that if S has no infinitedecreasing sequence and ∀x {∀y[y ≺ x → P (y)]} → P (x) , then P (x) is true for all x ∈ S. If it does not hold that P (x) is true for all x ∈ S, let x1 be an element of S such that P (x1 ) is not true. Then by the conditional statement already given, it must be the case that ∀y[y ≺ x1 → P (y)] is not true. This means that there is some x2 with x2 ≺ x1 such that P (x2 ) is not true. Again invoking the conditional statement, we get an x3 ≺ x2 such that P (x3 ) is not true, and so on forever. This contradicts the well-foundedness of our poset. Therefore, P (x) is true for all x ∈ S. 37. Suppose that R is a quasi-ordering. Because R is reflexive, if a ∈ A, then (a, a) ∈ R. This implies that (a, a) ∈ R −1 . Hence, a ∈ R ∩ R −1 . It follows that R ∩ R −1 is reflexive. R ∩ R −1 is symmetric for any relation R because, for any relation R, if (a, b) ∈ R then (b, a) ∈ R −1 and vice versa. To show that R ∩ R −1 is transitive, suppose that (a, b) ∈ R ∩ R −1 and (b, c) ∈ R ∩ R −1 . Because (a, b) ∈ R and (b, c) ∈ R, (a, c) ∈ R, because R is transitive. Similarly, because (a, b) ∈ R −1 and (b, c) ∈ R −1 , (b, a) ∈ R and (c, b) ∈ R, so (c, a) ∈ R and (a, c) ∈ R −1 . Hence, (a, c) ∈ R ∩ R −1 . It follows that R ∩ R −1 is an equivalence relation. 39. a) Because glb(x, y) = glb(y, x) and lub(x, y) = lub(y, x), it follows that x ∧ y = y ∧ x and x ∨ y = y ∨ x. b) Using the definition, (x ∧ y) ∧ z is a lower bound of x, y, and z that is greater than every other lower bound. Because x, y, and z play interchangeable roles, x ∧ (y ∧ z) is the same element. Similarly, (x ∨ y) ∨ z is an upper bound of x, y, and z that is less than every other upper bound. Because x, y, and z play interchangeable roles, x ∨(y ∨z) is the same element. c) To show that x ∧(x ∨y) = x it is sufficient to show that x is the greatest lower bound of x, and x ∨ y. Note that x is a lower bound of x, and because x ∨ y is by definition greater than x, x is a lower bound for it as well. Therefore, x is a lower bound. But any lower

bound of x has to be less than x, so x is the greatest lower bound. The second statement is the dual of the first; we omit its proof. d) x is a lower, and an upper, bound for itself and itself, and the greatest, and least, such bound. 41. a) Because 1 is the only element greater than or equal to 1, it is the only upper bound for 1 and therefore the only possible value of the least upper bound of x and 1. b) Because x 1, x is a lower bound for both x and 1 and no other lower bound can be greater than x, so x ∧ 1 = x. c) Because 0 x, x is an upper bound for both x and 0 and no other bound can be less than x, so x ∨ 0 = x. d) Because 0 is the only element less than or equal to 0, it is the only lower bound for 0 and therefore the only possible value of the greatest lower bound of x and 0. 43. L = (S, ⊆) where S = {∅, {1}, {2}, {3}, {1, 2}, {2, 3}, {1, 2, 3}} 45. Yes 47. The complement of a subset X ⊆ S is its complement S − X. To prove this, note that X ∨ (S − X) = 1 and X ∧ (S − X) = 0 because X ∪ (S − X) = S and X ∩ (S − X) = ∅. 49. Think of the rectangular grid as representing elements in a matrix. Thus we number from top to bottom and within that from left to right. The partial order is that (a, b) (c, d) iff a ≤ c and b ≤ d. Note that (1, 1) is the least element under this relation. The rules for Chomp as explained in Chapter 1 coincide with the rules stated in the preamble here. But now we can identify the point (a, b) with the natural number p a−1 q b−1 for all a and b with 1 ≤ a ≤ m and 1 ≤ b ≤ n. This identifies the points in the rectangular grid with the set S in this exercise, and the partial order just described is the same as the divides relation, because p a−1 q b−1 | pc−1 q d−1 if and only if the exponent of p on the left does not exceed the exponent of p on the right, and similarly for q.

CHAPTER 10 Section 10.1 1. a)

Boston Detroit Newark Washington

Miami

b)

Boston Detroit Newark Washington

Miami

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-59

c)

Boston

17.

Detroit

Fermat

Descartes

Newark Mersenne

Washington Miami

d)

Aristotle

Euclid

Fibonacci

Boston

Eratosthenes

Maurolico

Detroit al-Khowarizmi

Newark Washington

LamĂŠ

Goldbach BĂŠzout

Miami

e)

Stirling

Boston

De Morgan

Detroit

Gauss

Newark Washington Lovelace

Miami

3. Simple graph 5. Pseudograph 7. Directed graph 9. Directed multigraph 11. If uRv, then there is an edge associated with {u, v}. But {u, v} = {v, u}, so this edge is associated with {v, u} and therefore vRu. Thus, by definition, R is a symmetric relation. A simple graph does not allow loops; therefore, uRu never holds, and so by definition R is irreflexive. 13. a)

A1

Boole

19.

President

Director, R and D

A2

A5

Director, operations

21.

A3

Dodgson

Director, marketing

Chief financial officer

Tigers

Blue jays

Orioles

Cardinals

A4

b)

A1

A2

A5

A3 A4

c)

A1

A2

A6

A3 A5

15.

A4

Hairy Hermit thrush Robin woodpecker

Mockingbird Blue jay

Nuthatch

23. We find the telephone numbers in the call graph for February that are not present in the call graph for January and vice versa. For each number we find, we make a list of the numbers they called or were called by using the edges in the call graph. We examine these lists to find new telephone numbers in February that had similar calling patterns to defunct telephone numbers in January. 25. We use the graph model that has e-mail addresses as vertices and for each message sent, an edge from the e-mail address of the sender to the e-mail address of the recipient. For each e-mail address, we can make a list of other addresses they sent messages to and a list of other addresses from which they received messages. If two e-mail addresses had almost the same pattern, we conclude that these addresses might have belonged to the same

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-60

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

person who had recently changed his or her e-mail address. 27. Let V be the set of people at the party. Let E be the set of ordered pairs (u, v) in V × V such that u knows v’s name. The edges are directed, but multiple edges are not allowed. Literally, there is a loop at each vertex, but for simplicity, the model could omit the loops. 29. Vertices are the courses; edges are directed; edge uv means that course u is prerequisite for course v; courses without prerequisites are vertices with in-degree 0; courses that are not prerequisite for any other courses are vertices with out-degree 0. 31. Let the set of vertices be a set of people, and two vertices are joined by an edge if the two people were ever married. Ignoring complications, this graph has the property that there are two types of vertices (men and women), and every edge joins vertices of opposite types. 33.

S6

S5 S4 S2

S1

S3

S7

35. Represent people in the group by vertices. Put a directed edge into the graph for every pair of vertices. Label the edge from the vertex representing A to the vertex representing B with a + (plus) if A likes B, a − (minus) if A dislikes B, and a 0 if A is neutral about B.

calls v made; in the undirected graph, deg(v) is the number of calls either made or received by v. 17. (deg+ (v), deg− (v)) is the win–loss record of v. 19. In the undirected graph model in which the vertices are people in the group and two vertices are adjacent if those two people are friends, the degree of a vertex is the number of friends in the group that person has. By Exercise 18, there are two vertices with the same degree, which means that there are two people in the group with the same number of friends in the group. 21. Bipartite 23. Not bipartite 25. Not bipartite 27. a) Parts {h, s, n, w} and {P , Q, R, S}, E = {{P , n}, {P , w}, {Q, s}, {Q, n}, {R, n}, {R, w}, {S, h}, {S, s}} b) There is. c) {P w, Qs, Rn, Sh} among others 29. Only Barry is willing to marry Uma and Xia. 31. Model this with an undirected bipartite graph, with an edge between a man and a woman if they are willing to marry each other. By Hall’s theorem, it is enough to show that for every set S of women, the set N(S) of men willing to marry them has cardinality at least |S|. Let m be the number of edges between S and N(S). Since every vertex in S has degree k, it follows that m = k|S|. Because these edges are incident to N (S), it follows that m ≤ k|N(S)|. Therefore k|S| ≤ k|N (S)|, so |N (S)| ≥ |S|. 33. a) ({a, b, c, f }, {{a, b}, {a, f }, {b, c}, {b, f }}) b) ({a, x, c, f }, {{a, x}, {c, x}, {e, x}}) 35. a) n vertices, n(n − 1)/2 edges b) n vertices, n edges c) n + 1 vertices, 2n edges d) m+n vertices, mn edges e) 2n vertices, n2n−1 edges 37. a) 3, 3, 3, 3 b) 2, 2, 2, 2 c) 4, 3, 3, 3, 3 d) 3, 3, 2, 2, 2 e) 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 39. Each of the n vertices is adjacent to each of the other n − 1 vertices, so the degree sequence is n − 1, n − 1, . . . , n − 1 (n terms). 41. 7

Section 10.2 1. v = 6; e = 6; deg(a) = 2, deg(b) = 4, deg(c) = 1, deg(d) = 0, deg(e) = 2, deg(f ) = 3; c is pendant; d is isolated. 3. v = 9; e = 12; deg(a) = 3, deg(b) = 2, deg(c) = 4, deg(d) = 0, deg(e) = 6, deg(f ) = 0; deg(g) = 4; deg(h) = 2; deg(i) = 3; d and f are isolated. 5. No 7. v = 4; e = 7; deg− (a) = 3, deg− (b) = 1, deg− (c) = 2, deg− (d) = 1, deg+ (a) = 1, deg+ (b) = 2, deg+ (c) = 1, deg+ (d) = 3 9. 5 vertices, 13 edges; deg− (a) = 6, deg+ (a) = 1, deg− (b) = 1, deg+ (b) = 5, deg− (c) = 2, deg+ (c) = 5, deg− (d) = 4, deg+ (d) = 2, deg− (e) = 0, deg+ (e) = 0 11. a

e

b

d

c

f

13. The number of coauthors that person has; that person’s coauthors; a person who has no coauthors; a person who has only one coauthor 15. In the directed graph deg− (v) = number of calls v received, deg+ (v) = number of

43. a) Yes

b) No c) No d) No e) Yes

f) No. 45. First, suppose that d1 , d2 , . . . , dn is graphic. We must show that the sequence whose terms are d2 −1, d3 −1,…, dd1 +1 −1, dd1 +2 , dd1 +3 ,…, dn is graphic once it is put into nonincreasing order. In Exercise 44 it is proved that if the original sequence is graphic, then in fact there is a graph having this degree sequence in which the vertex of degree d1 is adjacent to the vertices of degrees d2 , d3 ,…, dd1 +1 . Remove from this graph the vertex of highest degree (d1 ). The resulting graph has the desired degree sequence. Conversely, suppose that d1 , d2 ,…, dn is a nonincreasing sequence such that the sequence

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-61

d2 − 1, d3 − 1,…, dd1 +1 − 1, dd1 +2 , dd1 +3 ,…, dn is graphic once it is put into nonincreasing order. Take a graph with this latter degree sequence, where vertex vi has degree di − 1 for 2 ≤ i ≤ d1 + 1 and vertex vi has degree di for d1 + 2 ≤ i ≤ n. Adjoin one new vertex (call it v1 ), and put in an edge from v1 to each of the vertices v2 , v3 ,…, vd1 +1 . The resulting graph has degree sequence d1 , d2 ,…, dn . 47. Let d1 , d2 ,…, dn be a nonincreasing sequence of nonnegative integers with an even sum. Construct a graph as follows: Take vertices v1 , v2 ,…, vn and put di /2 loops at vertex vi , for i = 1, 2, . . . , n. For each i, vertex vi now has degree either di or di − 1. Because the original sum was even, the number of vertices for which deg(vi ) = di − 1 is even. Pair them up arbitrarily, and put in an edge joining the vertices in each pair. 49. 17 51. a

b a

b a

b a

with an edge between vi and vj unless i ≡ j ± 1 (mod n) d) The graph whose vertices are represented by bit strings of length n with an edge between two vertices if the associated bit strings differ in more than one bit 61. v(v − 1)/2 − e 63. n − 1 − dn , n − 1 − dn−1 ,…, n − 1 − d2 , n − 1 − d1 65. The union of G and G contains an edge between each pair of the n vertices. Hence, this union is Kn . b 67. Exercise 7: c e a

d

Exercise 9:

Exercise 8:

a

e

a

b

b c d

c a

d c b a

d c b a

d c b a

d b

c a

d c b a

d c b a

d c b a

d b

c a

c b a

c b a

c b a

b

d

d

d

d

a

a

c

d c b a

c a

d

a

d c b a

c

d c b a

d

b

d c

d a

69. A directed graph G = (V , E) is its own converse if and only if it satisfies the condition (u, v) ∈ E if and only if (v, u) ∈ E. But this is precisely the condition that the associated relation must satisfy to be symmetric.

P(1, 0) P(1, 1)

P(1, 2)

P(2, 0) P(2, 1)

P(2, 2)

b

73. We can connect P (i, j ) and P (k, l) by using |i − k| hops to connect P (i, j ) and P (k, j ) and |j − l| hops to connect P (k, j ) and P (k, l). Hence, the total number of hops required to connect P (i, j ) and P (k, l) does not exceed |i −k|+|j −l|. This is less than or equal to m + m = 2m, which is O(m).

Section 10.3 1.

d c

c

d

d

53. a) For all n ≥ 1 b) For all n ≥ 3 c) For n = 3 d) For all n ≥ 0 55. 5 57. a

f

b e

c

g

d

a

a

b

e

c

71. P(0, 0) P(0, 1) P(0, 2)

c a

b

f

d

59. a) The graph with n vertices and no edges b) The disjoint union of Km and Kn c) The graph with vertices {v1 , . . . , vn }

Vertex

Adjacent Vertices

a b c d

b, c, d a, d a, d a, b, c

⎡ 5. 0 ⎢1 ⎢ ⎣1 1 ⎡ 7. 1 ⎢0 ⎢ ⎣1 0

1 0 0 1

1 0 0 1

1 0 1 1

1 0 0 1

⎤ 1 1⎥ ⎥ 1⎦ 0 ⎤ 1 1⎥ ⎥ 0⎦ 1

3.

⎡ 9. a) 0 ⎢1 ⎢ ⎣1 1

Vertex

Terminal Vertices

a b c d

a, b, c, d d a, b b, c, d

1 0 1 1

1 1 0 1

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

⎤ 1 1⎥ ⎥ 1⎦ 0

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-62

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

⎡ b) 0 ⎢1 ⎢ ⎢1 ⎢ ⎣1 1

1 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 0

⎡ d) 0 ⎢1 ⎢ ⎣0 1

1 0 1 0

0 1 0 1

⎤ ⎡ 1 e) 0 ⎢1 0⎥ ⎥ ⎢ ⎢0 ⎦ 1 ⎢ ⎣1 0 1

⎡ f) 0 ⎢1 ⎢ ⎢1 ⎢ ⎢0 ⎢ ⎢1 ⎢ ⎢0 ⎢ ⎣0 0

1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0

1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

11.

d

1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1

b

c

a

⎡ 15. 1 ⎢0 ⎢ ⎣2 1

⎤ ⎡ 1 c) 0 ⎢0 0⎥ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢1 0⎥ ⎢ ⎣1 0⎦ 0 1

0 1 1 2

2 1 1 0

⎤ 1 2⎥ ⎥ 0⎦ 1

1 0 1 0 1

1 1 0 0 0

1 1 0 0 0

0 1 0 1 1

1 0 1 0 1

⎤ 1 1⎥ ⎥ 1⎥ ⎥ 1⎦ 0

⎤ 0 0 0 0⎥ ⎥ 1 0⎥ ⎥ 0 1⎥ ⎥ 1 0⎥ ⎥ 0 1⎥ ⎥ 0 1⎦ 1 0 13. ⎡ 0 0 ⎢0 0 ⎢ ⎣1 1 0 2 17.

19. 0 ⎢0 ⎢ ⎣0 1

1 1 1 0

0 1 1 0

⎤

0 0⎥ ⎥ 1⎦ 0

21.

1 ⎢1 ⎢ ⎣1 0

⎡ b) 1 ⎢1 ⎢ ⎢0 ⎢ ⎢ .. ⎢. ⎢ ⎣0 0 ⎡ c) 0 ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣

0 2⎥ ⎥ 1⎦ 0

a

⎡

29. deg(v) − number of loops at v; deg− (v) a loop, 1 if e is a loop ⎡ ⎤ 33. a) 1 1 · · · 1 0 · · · 0 ⎢1 0 · · · 0 1 · · · 0 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢0 1 · · · 0 1 · · · 0 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ .. .. .. .. .. ⎥ ⎢. . ⎥ . . . ⎢ ⎥ ⎣0 0 · · · 0 0 · · · 1 ⎦ 0 0 ··· 1 0 ··· 1

⎤

1 1 0 1

c

1 0 0 2

⎤ 1 2⎥ ⎥ 1⎦ 0

2 0 1 1

25. Yes

23. a

b

c

27. Exercise 13: ⎡ 1 ⎢0 ⎢ ⎣1 0 Exercise 14: ⎡ 1 ⎢1 ⎢ ⎣0 0 ⎡ Exercise 15: 1 1 ⎢0 0 ⎢ ⎣0 1 0 0

0 1 1 .. .

··· ··· ···

0 0

··· ···

0

··· B

0 0 0 .. . 1 1 0

0 1 1 0

0 1 0 1

0 1 0 1

⎤ 0 0⎥ ⎥ 1⎦ 1

1 1 0 0

1 1 0 0

1 0 0 1

0 1 1 0

0 0 1 1

0 0 1 1

⎤ 0 0⎥ ⎥ 1⎦ 1

1 0 1 0

1 0 0 1

0 1 0 0

0 1 1 0

0 1 0 1

0 1 0 1

0 0 1 0

⎤ 0 0⎥ ⎥ 0⎦ 1

31. 2 if e is not

⎤ 1 0⎥ ⎥ 0⎥ ⎥ .. ⎥ .⎥ ⎥ 0⎦ 1 1 1 0 .. . 0

1 0 1 .. . 0

where B is the answer to (b) ⎡ d) 1 1 · · · 1 0 · · · ⎢ ⎢0 0 · · · 0 1 · · · ⎢. . .. .. ⎢. . ⎢. . . . ⎢ ⎢0 0 · · · 0 0 · · · ⎢ ⎢1 0 · · · 0 1 · · · ⎢ ⎢0 1 · · · 0 0 · · · ⎢. . .. .. ⎢. . ⎣. . . . 0 0 ··· 1 0 ···

b

d

⎡

⎤ 1 1⎥ ⎥ 0⎥ ⎥ 0⎦ 0

0 0 1 1 1

··· ··· ··· ···

⎤ 1 0⎥ ⎥ 0⎥ ⎥ .. ⎥ .⎦ 1

⎤ 0 ⎥ 0⎥ .. ⎥ ⎥ .⎥ ⎥ 1⎥ ⎥ 0⎥ ⎥ 1⎥ .. ⎥ ⎥ .⎦ 0

35. Isomorphic 37. Isomorphic 39. Isomorphic 41. Not isomorphic 43. Isomorphic 45. G is isomorphic to itself by the identity function, so isomorphism is reflexive. Suppose that G is isomorphic to H . Then there exists a one-to-one correspondence f from G to H that preserves adjacency and nonadjacency. It follows that f −1 is a one-to-one correspondence from H to G that preserves adjacency and nonadjacency. Hence, isomorphism is symmetric. If G is isomorphic to H and H is isomorphic to K, then there are one-to-one correspondences f and g from G to H and from H to K that preserve adjacency and nonadjacency. It follows that g ◦ f is a one-to-one correspondence from G to K that preserves adjacency and nonadjacency. Hence, isomorphism is transitive. 47. All zeros 49. Label the vertices in order so that all of the vertices in the first set of the partition of the vertex set come first. Because no edges join vertices in the same set of the partition, the matrix has the desired form. 51. C5 53. n = 5 only 55. 4 57. a) Yes b) No c) No 59. G = (V1 , E1 ) is isomorphic to H = (V2 , E2 ) if and only if there exist functions f from V1 to V2 and g from E1 to E2 such that each is a one-to-one correspondence and for every edge e in E1 the endpoints of g(e) are f (v) and f (w) where v and w are the

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-63

endpoints of e. 61. Yes 63. Yes 65. If f is an isomorphism from a directed graph G to a directed graph H , then f is also an isomorphism from Gconv to H conv . To see this note that (u, v) is an edge of Gconv if and only if (v, u) is an edge of G if and only if (f (v), f (u)) is an edge of H if and only if (f (u), f (v)) is an edge of H conv . 67. Many answers are possible; for example, C6 and C3 âˆŞ C3 . 69. The product is [aij ] where aij is the number of edges from vi to vj when i = j and aii is the number of edges incident to vi . 71. The graphs in Exercise 41 provide a devilâ€™s pair.

Section 10.4 1. a) Path of length 4; not a circuit; not simple b) Not a path c) Not a path d) Simple circuit of length 5 3. No 5. No 7. Maximal sets of people with the property that for any two of them, we can find a string of acquaintances that takes us from one to the other 9. If a person has ErdË?os number n, then there is a path of length n from that person to ErdË?os in the collaboration graph, so by definition, that means that that person is in the same component as ErdË?os. If a person is in the same component as ErdË?os, then there is a path from that person to ErdË?os, and the length of the shortest such path is that personâ€™s ErdË?os number. 11. a) Weakly connected b) Weakly connected c) Not strongly or weakly connected 13. The maximal sets of phone numbers for which it is possible to find directed paths between every two different numbers in the set 15. a) {a, b, f }, {c, d, e} b) {a, b, c, d, e, h}, {f }, {g} c) {a, b, d, e, f, g, h, i}, {c} 17. Suppose the strong components of u and v are not disjoint, say with vertex w in both. Suppose x is a vertex in the strong component of u. Then x is also in the strong component of v, because there is a path from x to v (namely the path from x to u followed by the path from u to w followed by the path from w to v) and vice versa. Thus x is in the strong component of v. This shows that the strong component of u is a subgraph of the strong component of v, and equality follows by symmetry. 19. a) 2 b) 7 c) 20 d) 61 21. Not isomorphic (G has a triangle; H does not) 23. Isomorphic (the path u1 , u2 , u7 , u6 , u5 , u4 , u3 , u8 , u1 corresponds to the path v1 , v2 , v3 , v4 , v5 , v8 , v7 , v6 , v1 ) 25. a) 3 b) 0 c) 27 d) 0 27. a) 1 b) 0 c) 2 d) 1 e) 5 f) 3 29. R is reflexive by definition. Assume that (u, v) âˆˆ R; then there is a path from u to v. Then (v, u) âˆˆ R because there is a path from v to u, namely, the path from u to v traversed backward. Assume that (u, v) âˆˆ R and (v, w) âˆˆ R; then there are paths from u to v and from v to w. Putting these two paths together gives a path from u to w. Hence, (u, w) âˆˆ R. It follows that R is transitive. 31. c 33. b, c, e, i 35. If a vertex is pendant it is clearly not a cut vertex. So an endpoint of a cut edge that is a cut vertex is not pendant. Removal of a cut edge produces a graph with more connected components than in the original graph. If an endpoint of a cut edge is not pendant, the connected component it is in after the removal of the cut edge contains more than just this vertex. Consequently, removal of that vertex and all edges incident to it, including the original

cut edge, produces a graph with more connected components than were in the original graph. Hence, an endpoint of a cut edge that is not pendant is a cut vertex. 37. Assume there exists a connected graph G with at most one vertex that is not a cut vertex. Define the distance between the vertices u and v, denoted by d(u, v), to be the length of the shortest path between u and v in G. Let s and t be vertices in G such that d(s, t) is a maximum. Either s or t (or both) is a cut vertex, so without loss of generality suppose that s is a cut vertex. Let w belong to the connected component that does not contain t of the graph obtained by deleting s and all edges incident to s from G. Because every path from w to t contains s, d(w, t) > d(s, t), which is a contradiction. 39. a) Denverâ€“ Chicago, Bostonâ€“New York b) Seattleâ€“Portland, Portlandâ€“ San Francisco, Salt Lake Cityâ€“Denver, New Yorkâ€“Boston, Bostonâ€“Burlington, Bostonâ€“Bangor 41. A minimal set of people who collectively influence everyone (directly or indirectly); {Deborah} 43. An edge cannot connect two vertices in different connected components. Because there are at most C(ni , 2) edges in the connected component with ni vertices, it follows that there are at most ki=1 C(ni , 2) edges in the graph. 45. Suppose that G is not connected. Then it has a component of k vertices for some k, 1 â‰¤ k â‰¤ n âˆ’ 1. The most edges G could have is C(k, 2) + C(n âˆ’ k, 2) = [k(k âˆ’ 1) + (n âˆ’ k)(n âˆ’ k âˆ’ 1)]/2 = k 2 âˆ’ nk + (n2 âˆ’ n)/2. This quadratic function of f is minimized at k = n/2 and maximized at k = 1 or k = n âˆ’ 1. Hence, if G is not connected, the number of edges does not exceed the value of this function at 1 and at n âˆ’ 1, namely, (n âˆ’ 1)(n âˆ’ 2)/2. 47. a) 1 b) 2 c) 6 d) 21 49. a) Removing an edge from a cycle leaves a path, which is still connected. b) Removing an edge from the cycle portion of the wheel leaves that portion still connected and the central vertex still connected to it as well. Removing a spoke leaves the cycle intact and the central vertex still connected to it as well. c) Any four vertices, two from each part of the bipartition, are connected by a 4-cycle; removing one edge does not disconnect them. d) Deleting the edge joining (b1 , b2 , . . . , biâˆ’1 , 0, bi+1 , . . . , bn ) and (b1 , b2 , . . . , biâˆ’1 , 1, bi+1 , . . . , bn ) does not disconnect the graph because these two vertices are still joined via the path (b1 , b2 , . . . , biâˆ’1 , 0, bi+1 , . . . , 0), (b1 , b2 , . . . , biâˆ’1 , 0, bi+1 , . . . , 1), (b1 , b2 , . . . , biâˆ’1 , 1, bi+1 , . . . , 1), (b1 , b2 , . . . , biâˆ’1 , 1, bi+1 , . . . , 0) if n < 2 and bn = 0, and similarly in the other three cases. 51. If G is complete, then removing vertices one by one leaves a complete graph at each step, so we never get a disconnected graph. Conversely, if edge uv is missing from G, then removing all the vertices except u and v creates a disconnected graph. 53. Both equal min(m, n). 55. Let G be a graph with n vertices; then Îş(G) â‰¤ nâˆ’1. Let C be a smallest edge cut, leaving a nonempty proper subset S of the vertices of G disconnected from the complementary set S = V âˆ’ S. If xy is an edge of G for every x âˆˆ S and y âˆˆ S , then the size of C is |S||S |, which is at least n âˆ’ 1, so Îş(G) â‰¤ Îť(G). Otherwise, let x âˆˆ S and y âˆˆ S be nonadjacent vertices. Let T consist of all neighbors of x in S together with all vertices of S âˆ’ {x} with neighbors

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-64

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

in S . Then T is a vertex cut, because it separates x and y. Now look at the edges from x to T âˆŠ S and one edge from each vertex of T âˆŠ S to S ; this gives us |T | distinct edges that lie in C, so Îť(G) = |C| â‰Ľ |T | â‰Ľ Îş(G). 57. 2 59. Let the simple paths P1 and P2 be u = x0 , x1 , . . . , xn = v and u = y0 , y1 , . . . , ym = v, respectively. The paths thus start out at the same vertex. Since the paths do not contain the same set of edges, they must diverge eventually. If they diverge only after one of them has ended, then the rest of the other path is a simple circuit from v to v. Otherwise we can suppose that x0 = y0 , x1 = y1 , â€Ś, xi = yi , but xi+1 = yi+1 . To form our simple circuit, we follow the path yi , yi+1 , yi+2 , and so on, until it once again first encounters a vertex on P1 (possibly as early as yi+1 , no later than ym ). Once we are back on P1 , we follow it alongâ€”forwards or backwards, as necessaryâ€”to return to xi . Since xi = yi , this certainly forms a circuit. It must be a simple circuit, since no edge among the xk s or the yl s can be repeated (P1 and P2 are simple by hypothesis) and no edge among the xk s can equal one of the edges yl that we used, since we abandoned P2 for P1 as soon as we hit P1 . 61. The graph G is connected if and only if every off-diagonal entry of A+A2 +A3 +Âˇ Âˇ Âˇ+Anâˆ’1 is positive, where A is the adjacency matrix of G. 63. If the graph is bipartite, say with parts A and B, then the vertices in every path must alternately lie in A and B. Therefore a path that starts in A, say, will end in B after an odd number of steps and in A after an even number of steps. Because a circuit ends at the same vertex where it starts, the length must be even. Conversely, suppose that all circuits have even length; we must show that the graph is bipartite. We can assume that the graph is connected, because if it is not, then we can just work on one component at a time. Let v be a vertex of the graph, and let A be the set of all vertices to which there is a path of odd length starting at v, and let B be the set of all vertices to which there is a path of even length starting at v. Because the component is connected, every vertex lies in A or B. No vertex can lie in both A and B, because if one did, then following the odd-length path from v to that vertex and then back along the even-length path from that vertex to v would produce an odd circuit, contrary to the hypothesis. Thus, the set of vertices has been partitioned into two sets. To show that every edge has endpoints in different parts, suppose that xy is an edge, where x âˆˆ A. Then the odd-length path from v to x followed by xy produces an evenlength path from v to y, so y âˆˆ B. (Similarly, if x âˆˆ B.) 65. (H1 W1 H2 W2 "boat#, âˆ…) â†’ (H2 W2 , H1 W1 "boat#) â†’ (H1 H2 W2 "boat#, W1 ) â†’ (W2 , H1 W1 H2 "boat#) â†’ (H2 W2 "boat#, H1 W1 ) â†’ (âˆ…, H1 W1 H2 W2 "boat#)

Section 10.5 1. Neither 3. No Euler circuit; a, e, c, e, b, e, d, b, a, c, d 5. a, b, c, d, c, e, d, b, e, a, e, a 7. a, i, h, g, d, e, f, g, c, e, h, d, c, a, b, i, c, b, h, a 9. No, A still has odd degree. 11. When the graph in which vertices represent intersections and edges

streets has an Euler path 13. Yes 15. No 17. If there is an Euler path, then as we follow it each vertex except the starting and ending vertices must have equal in-degree and out-degree, because whenever we come to a vertex along an edge, we leave it along another edge. The starting vertex must have out-degree 1 larger than its in-degree, because we use one edge leading out of this vertex and whenever we visit it again we use one edge leading into it and one leaving it. Similarly, the ending vertex must have in-degree 1 greater than its out-degree. Because the Euler path with directions erased produces a path between any two vertices, in the underlying undirected graph, the graph is weakly connected. Conversely, suppose the graph meets the degree conditions stated. If we add one more edge from the vertex of deficient out-degree to the vertex of deficient in-degree, then the graph has every vertex with equal in-degree and out-degree. Because the graph is still weakly connected, by Exercise 16 this new graph has an Euler circuit. Now delete the added edge to obtain the Euler path. 19. Neither 21. No Euler circuit; a, d, e, d, b, a, e, c, e, b, c, b, e 23. Neither 25. Follow the same procedure as Algorithm 1, taking care to follow the directions of edges. 27. a) n = 2 b) None c) None d) n = 1 29. Exercise 1:1 time; Exercises 2â€“7: 0 times 31. a, b, c, d, e, a is a Hamilton circuit. 33. No Hamilton circuit exists, because once a purported circuit has reached e it would have nowhere to go. 35. No Hamilton circuit exists, because every edge in the graph is incident to a vertex of degree 2 and therefore must be in the circuit. 37. a, b, c, f, d, e is a Hamilton path. 39. f, e, d, a, b, c is a Hamilton path. 41. No Hamilton path exists. There are eight vertices of degree 2, and only two of them can be end vertices of a path. For each of the other six, their two incident edges must be in the path. It is not hard to see that if there is to be a Hamilton path, exactly one of the inside corner vertices must be an end, and that this is impossible. 43. a, b, c, f, i, h, g, d, e is a Hamilton path. 45. m = n â‰Ľ 2 47. a) (i) No, (ii) No, (iii) Yes b) (i) No, (ii) No, (iii)Yes c) (i)Yes, (ii)Yes, (iii)Yes d) (i)Yes, (ii)Yes, (iii) Yes 49. The result is trivial for n = 1: code is 0, 1. Assume we have a Gray code of order n. Let c1 , . . . , ck , k = 2n be such a code. Then 0c1 , . . . , 0ck , 1ck , . . . , 1c1 is a Gray code of order n + 1. 51. procedure Fleury(G = (V , E): connected multigraph with the degrees of all vertices even, V = {v1 , . . . , vn }) v := v1 circuit := v H := G while H has edges e := first edge with endpoint v in H (with respect to listing of V ) such that e is not a cut edge of H , if one exists, and simply the first edge in H with endpoint v otherwise w := other endpoint of e circuit := circuit with e, w added v := w H := H âˆ’ e return circuit {circuit is an Euler circuit}

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-65

53. If G has an Euler circuit, then it also has an Euler path. If not, add an edge between the two vertices of odd degree and apply the algorithm to get an Euler circuit. Then delete the new edge. 55. Suppose G = (V , E) is a bipartite graph with V = V1 ∪ V2 , where V1 ∩ V2 = ∅ and no edge connects a vertex in V1 and a vertex in V2 . Suppose that G has a Hamilton circuit. Such a circuit must be of the form a1 , b1 , a2 , b2 , . . . , ak , bk , a1 , where ai ∈ V1 and bi ∈ V2 for i = 1, 2, . . . , k. Because the Hamilton circuit visits each vertex exactly once, except for v1 , where it begins and ends, the number of vertices in the graph equals 2k, an even number. Hence, a bipartite graph with an odd number of vertices cannot have a Hamilton circuit. 57. 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

59. We represent the squares of a 3 × 4 chessboard as follows:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

A knight’s tour can be made by following the moves 8, 10, 1, 7, 9, 2, 11, 5, 3, 12, 6, 4. 61. We represent the squares of a 4 × 4 chessboard as follows:

of edges. But now square 14 is forced to be joined to squares 5 and 12, completing a circuit too soon (5–14–12–3–5). This contradiction shows that there is no knight’s tour on the 4 × 4 board. 63. Because there are mn squares on an m×n board, if both m and n are odd, there are an odd number of squares. Because by Exercise 62 the corresponding graph is bipartite, by Exercise 55 it has no Hamilton circuit. Hence, there is no reentrant knight’s tour. 65. a) If G does not have a Hamilton circuit, continue as long as possible adding missing edges one at a time in such a way that we do not obtain a graph with a Hamilton circuit. This cannot go on forever, because once we’ve formed the complete graph by adding all missing edges, there is a Hamilton circuit. Whenever the process stops, we have obtained a (necessarily noncomplete) graph H with the desired property. b) Add one more edge to H . This produces a Hamilton circuit, which uses the added edge. The path consisting of this circuit with the added edge omitted is a Hamilton path in H . c) Clearly v1 and vn are not adjacent in H , because H has no Hamilton circuit. Therefore they are not adjacent in G. But the hypothesis was that the sum of the degrees of vertices not adjacent in G was at least n. This inequality can be rewritten as n − deg(vn ) ≤ deg(v1 ). But n − deg(vn ) is just the number of vertices not adjacent to vn . d) Because there is no vertex following vn in the Hamilton path, vn is not in S. Each one of the deg(v1 ) vertices adjacent to v1 gives rise to an element of S, so S contains deg(v1 ) vertices. e) By part (c) there are at most deg(v1 )−1 vertices other than vn not adjacent to vn , and by part (d) there are deg(v1 ) vertices in S, none of which is vn . Therefore at least one vertex of S is adjacent to vn . By definition, if vk is this vertex, then H contains edges vk vn and v1 vk+1 , where 1 < k < n−1. f) Now v1 , v2 , . . . , vk−1 , vk , vn , vn−1 , . . . , vk+1 , v1 is a Hamilton circuit in H , contradicting the construction of H . Therefore, our assumption that G did not originally have a Hamilton circuit is wrong, and our proof by contradiction is complete.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Section 10.6

13

14

15

16

1. a) Vertices are the stops, edges join adjacent stops, weights are the times required to travel between adjacent stops. b) Same as part (a), except weights are distances between adjacent stops. c) Same as part (a), except weights are fares between stops. 3. 16 5. Exercise 2: a, b, e, d, z; Exercise 3: a, c, d, e, g, z; Exercise 4: a, b, e, h, l, m, p, s, z 7. a) a, c, d b) a, c, d, f c) c, d, f e) b, d, e, g, z 9. a) Direct b) Via NewYork c) Via Atlanta and Chicago d) Via NewYork 11. a) Via Chicago b) Via Chicago c) Via Los Angeles d) Via Chicago 13. a) Via Chicago b) Via Chicago c) Via Los Angeles d) Via Chicago 15. Do not stop the algorithm when z is added to the set S. 17. a) Via Woodbridge, via Woodbridge and Camden b) Via Woodbridge, via Woodbridge and Camden 19. For instance, sightseeing tours, street cleaning

There are only two moves from each of the four corner squares. If we include all the edges 1–10, 1–7, 16–10, and 16–7, a circuit is completed too soon, so at least one of these edges must be missing. Without loss of generality, assume the path starts 1–10, 10–16, 16–7. Now the only moves from square 3 are to squares 5, 10, and 12, and square 10 already has two incident edges. Therefore, 3–5 and 3–12 must be in the Hamilton circuit. Similarly, edges 8–2 and 8–15 must be in the circuit. Now the only moves from square 9 are to squares 2, 7, and 15. If there were edges from square 9 to both squares 2 and 15, a circuit would be completed too soon. Therefore the edge 9–7 must be in the circuit giving square 7 its full complement

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-66

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

21. a b c d e z

a

b

c

d

e

z

4 3 2 8 10 13

3 2 1 5 7 10

2 1 2 6 8 11

8 5 6 4 2 5

10 7 8 2 4 3

13 10 11 5 3 6

23. O(n3 ) 25. a–c–b–d–a (or the same circuit starting at some other point and/or traversing the vertices in reverse order) 27. San Francisco–Denver–Detroit–New York–Los Angeles–San Francisco (or the same circuit starting at some other point and/or traversing the vertices in reverse order) 29. Consider this graph: a 1 b

2 c

100

The circuit a-b-a-c-a visits each vertex at least once (and the vertex a twice) and has total weight 6. Every Hamilton circuit has total weight 103. 31. Let v1 , v2 , . . . , vn be a topological ordering of the vertices of the given directed acyclic graph. Let w(i, j ) be the weight of edge vi vj . Iteratively define P (i) with the intent that it will be the weight of a longest path ending at vi and C(i) with the intent that it will be the vertex preceding vi in some longest path: For i from 1 to n, let P (i) be the maximum of P (j ) + w(j, i) over all j < i such that vj vi is an edge in the directed graph (and if such a j exists let C(i) be a value of j for which this maximum is achieved) and let P (i) = 0 if there are no such values of j . At the conclusion of this loop, a longest path can be found by choosing i that maximizes P (i) and following the C links back to the start of the path.

three edges from v1 , v2 , and v3 to v4 forms four regions. No matter which of these four regions v5 is in, it is possible to join it to only three, and not all four, of the other vertices. 13. 8 15. Because there are no loops or multiple edges and no simple circuits of length 3, and the degree of the unbounded region is at least 4, each region has degree at least 4. Thus 2e ≥ 4r, or r ≤ e/2. But r = e − v + 2, so we have e − v + 2 ≤ e/2, which implies that e ≤ 2v − 4. 17. As in the argument in the proof of Corollary 1, we have 2e ≥ 5r and r = e − v + 2. Thus e − v + 2 ≤ 2e/5, which implies that e ≤ (5/3)v−(10/3). 19. Only (a) and (c) 21. Not homeomorphic to K3,3 23. Planar 25. Nonplanar 27. a) 1 b) 3 c) 9 d) 2 e) 4 f) 16 29. Draw Km,n as described in the hint. The number of crossings is four times the number in the first quadrant. The vertices on the x-axis to the right of the origin are (1, 0), (2, 0), . . . , (m/2, 0) and the vertices on the y-axis above the origin are (0, 1), (0, 2), . . . , (0, n/2). We obtain all crossings by choosing any two numbers a and b with 1 ≤ a < b ≤ m/2 and two numbers r and s with 1 ≤ r < s ≤ n/2; we get exactly one crossing in the graph between the edge connecting (a, 0) and (0, s) and the edge connecting (b, 0) and (0, r). Hence, the number of crossings in the first quadrant is C m2 , 2 · C n2 , 2 = (m/2)(m/2−1) (n/2)(n/2−1) · . Hence, the total number of cross2 2 ings is 4 · mn(m − 2)(n − 2)/64 = mn(m − 2)(n − 2)/16. 31. a) 2 b) 2 c) 2 d) 2 e) 2 f) 2 33. The formula is valid for n ≤ 4. If n > 4, by Exercise 32 the thickness of Kn is 2 at least C(n, 2)/(3n − 6) = (n + 1 + n−2 )/6 rounded up. Because this quantity is never an integer, it equals (n+7)/6. 35. This follows from Exercise 34 because Km,n has mn edges and m + n vertices and has no triangles because it is bipartite. 37.

Section 10.7 1. Yes

3.

5. No

b

e

a

d

c

1. Four colors

3. Three colors A

B

d

a

7. Yes

Section 10.8

A

e

F D

f

c

C

b

9. No 11. A triangle is formed by the planar representation of the subgraph of K5 consisting of the edges connecting v1 , v2 , and v3 . The vertex v4 must be placed either within the triangle or outside of it. We will consider only the case when v4 is inside the triangle; the other case is similar. Drawing the

E

B

C

E

D

5. 3 7. 3 9. 2 11. 3 13. Graphs with no edges 15. 3 if n is even, 4 if n is odd 17. Period 1: Math 115, Math 185; period 2: Math 116, CS 473; period 3: Math 195, CS 101; period 4: CS 102; period 5: CS 273 19. 5 21. Exercise 5: 3 Exercise 6: 6 Exercise 7: 3 Exercise 8: 4 Exercise 9: 3 Exercise 10: 6 Exercise 11: 4 23. a) 2 if n is even, 3 if n is odd b) n 25. Two edges that have the same color share no endpoints. Therefore if more than n/2 edges were colored the

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-67

same, the graph would have more than 2(n/2) = n vertices. 27. 5 29. Color 1: e, f, d; color 2: c, a, i, g; color 3: h, b, j 31. Color C6 33. Four colors are needed to color Wn when n is an odd integer greater than 1, because three colors are needed for the rim (see Example 4), and the center vertex, being adjacent to all the rim vertices, will require a fourth color. To see that the graph obtained from Wn by deleting one edge can be colored with three colors, consider two cases. If we remove a rim edge, then we can color the rim with two colors, by starting at an endpoint of the removed edge and using the colors alternately around the portion of the rim that remains. The third color is then assigned to the center vertex. If we remove a spoke edge, then we can color the rim by assigning color #1 to the rim endpoint of the removed edge and colors #2 and #3 alternately to the remaining vertices on the rim, and then assign color #1 to the center. 35. Suppose that G is chromatically k-critical but has a vertex v of degree k âˆ’ 2 or less. Remove from G one of the edges incident to v. By definition of â€œk-critical,â€? the resulting graph can be colored with k âˆ’ 1 colors. Now restore the missing edge and use this coloring for all vertices except v. Because we had a proper coloring of the smaller graph, no two adjacent vertices have the same color. Furthermore, v has at most k âˆ’ 2 neighbors, so we can color v with an unused color to obtain a proper (k âˆ’1)coloring of G. This contradicts the fact that G has chromatic number k. Therefore, our assumption was wrong, and every vertex of G must have degree at least k âˆ’ 1. 37. a) 6 b) 7 c) 9 d) 11 39. Represent frequencies by colors and zones by vertices. Join two vertices with an edge if the zones these vertices represent interfere with one another. Then a k-tuple coloring is precisely an assignment of frequencies that avoids interference. 41. We use induction on the number of vertices of the graph. Every graph with five or fewer vertices can be colored with five or fewer colors, because each vertex can get a different color. That takes care of the basis case(s). So we assume that all graphs with k vertices can be 5-colored and consider a graph G with k + 1 vertices. By Corollary 2 in Section 10.7, G has a vertex v with degree at most 5. Remove v to form the graph G . Because G has only k vertices, we 5-color it by the inductive hypothesis. If the neighbors of v do not use all five colors, then we can 5-color G by assigning to v a color not used by any of its neighbors. The difficulty arises if v has five neighbors, and each has a different color in the 5-coloring of G . Suppose that the neighbors of v, when considered in clockwise order around v, are a, b, c, m, and p. (This order is determined by the clockwise order of the curves representing the edges incident to v.) Suppose that the colors of the neighbors are azure, blue, chartreuse, magenta, and purple, respectively. Consider the azure-chartreuse subgraph (i.e., the vertices in G colored azure or chartreuse and all the edges between them). If a and c are not in the same component of this graph, then in the component containing a we can interchange these two colors (make the azure vertices chartreuse and vice versa), and G will still be properly colored. That makes a chartreuse, so we can now color v azure, and G has been properly colored. If a and c are in the same component,

then there is a path of vertices alternately colored azure and chartreuse joining a and c. This path together with edges av and vc divides the plane into two regions, with b in one of them and m in the other. If we now interchange blue and magenta on all the vertices in the same region as b, we will still have a proper coloring of G , but now blue is available for v. In this case, too, we have found a proper coloring of G. This completes the inductive step, and the theorem is proved. 43. We follow the hint. Because the measures of the interior angles of a pentagon total 540â—Ś , there cannot be as many as three interior angles of measure more than 180â—Ś (reflex angles). If there are no reflex angles, then the pentagon is convex, and a guard placed at any vertex can see all points. If there is one reflex angle, then the pentagon must look essentially like figure (a) below, and a guard at vertex v can see all points. If there are two reflex angles, then they can be adjacent or nonadjacent (figures (b) and (c)); in either case, a guard at vertex v can see all points. [In figure (c), choose the reflex vertex closer to the bottom side.] Thus for all pentagons, one guard suffices, so g(5) = 1.

v

(a)

v (b)

v (c)

45. The figure suggested in the hint (generalized to have k prongs for any k â‰Ľ 1) has 3k vertices. The sets of locations from which the tips of different prongs are visible are disjoint. Therefore, a separate guard is needed for each of the k prongs, so at least k guards are needed. This shows that g(3k) â‰Ľ k = 3k/3. If n = 3k + i, where 0 â‰¤ i â‰¤ 2, then g(n) â‰Ľ g(3k) â‰Ľ k = n/3.

Supplementary Exercises 1. 2500 3. Yes 5. Yes 7. m t<j ni nj i=1 ni vertices, edges 9. a) If x âˆˆ N (A âˆŞ B), then x is adjacent to some vertex v âˆˆ A âˆŞ B. WOLOG suppose v âˆˆ A; then x âˆˆ N (A) and therefore also in N (A) âˆŞ N (B). Conversely, if x âˆˆ N (A) âˆŞ N(B), then WOLOG suppose x âˆˆ N (A). Thus x is adjacent to some vertex v âˆˆ A âŠ† A âˆŞ B, so x âˆˆ N(A âˆŞ B). b) If x âˆˆ N (A âˆŠ B), then x is adjacent to some vertex v âˆˆ AâˆŠB. Since both v âˆˆ A and v âˆˆ B, it follows that x âˆˆ N (A) and x âˆˆ N (B), whence x âˆˆ N (A) âˆŠ N (B). For the counterexample, let G = ({u, v, w}, {{u, v}, {v, w}}), A = {u}, and B = {w}. 11. (c, a, p, x, n, m) and many others 13. (c, d, a, b) and many others 15. 6 times the

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-68

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

number of triangles divided by the number of paths of length 2 17. a) The probability that two actors each of whom has appeared in a film with a randomly chosen actor have appeared in a film together b) The probability that two of a randomly chosen person’s Facebook friends are themselves Facebook friends c) The probability that two of a randomly chosen person’s coauthors are themselves coauthors d) The probability that two proteins that each interact with a randomly chosen protein interact with each other e) The probability that two routers each of which has a communications link to a randomly chosen router are themselves linked 19. Complete subgraphs containing the following sets of vertices: {b, c, e, f }, {a, b, g}, {a, d, g}, {d, e, g}, {b, e, g} 21. Complete subgraphs containing the following sets of vertices: {b, c, d, j, k}, {a, b, j, k}, {e, f, g, i}, {a, b, i}, {a, i, j }, {b, d, e}, {b, e, i}, {b, i, j }, {g, h, i}, {h, i, j } 23. {c, d} is a minimum dominating set. 25. a)

b)

27. a) 1 b) 2 c) 3 29. a) A path from u to v in a graph G induces a path from f (u) to f (v) in an isomorphic graph H . b) Suppose f is an isomorphism from G to H . If v0 , v1 , . . . , vn , v0 is a Hamilton circuit in G, then f (v0 ), f (v1 ), . . . , f (vn ), f (v0 ) must be a Hamilton circuit in H because it is still a circuit and f (vi ) = f (vj ) for 0 ≤ i < j ≤ n. c) Suppose f is an isomorphism from G to H . If v0 , v1 , . . . , vn , v0 is an Euler circuit in G, then f (v0 ), f (v1 ), . . . , f (vn ), f (v0 ) must be an Euler circuit in H because it is a circuit that contains each edge exactly once. d) Two isomorphic graphs must have the same crossing number because they can be drawn exactly the same way in the plane. e) Suppose f is an isomorphism from G to H . Then v is isolated in G if and only if f (v) is isolated in H . Hence, the graphs must have the same number of isolated vertices.

f) Suppose f is an isomorphism from G to H . If G is bipartite, then the vertex set of G can be partitioned into V1 and V2 with no edge connecting vertices within V1 or vertices within V2 . Then the vertex set of H can be partitioned into f (V1 ) and f (V2 ) with no edge connecting vertices within f (V1 ) or vertices within f (V2 ). 31. 3 33. a) Yes b) No 35. No 37. Yes 39. If e is a cut edge with endpoints u and v, then if we direct e from u to v, there will be no path in the directed graph from v to u, or else e would not have been a cut edge. Similar reasoning works if we direct e from v to u. 41. n − 1 43. Let the vertices represent the chickens. We include the edge (u, v) in the graph if and only if chicken u dominates chicken v. 45. By the handshaking theorem, the average vertex degree is 2m/n, which equals the minimum degree; it follows that all the vertex degrees are equal. 47. K3,3 and the skeleton of a triangular prism 49. a) A Hamilton circuit in the graph exactly corresponds to a seating of the knights at the Round Table such that adjacent knights are friends. b) The degree of each vertex in this graph is at least 2n − 1 − (n − 1) = n ≥ (2n/2), so by Dirac’s theorem, this graph has a Hamilton circuit. c) a, b, d, f, g, z 51. a) 4 b) 2 c) 3 d) 4 e) 4 f) 2 53. a) Suppose that G = (V , E). Let a, b ∈ V . We must show that the distance between a and b in G is at most 2. If {a, b} ∈ E this distance is 1, so assume {a, b} ∈ E. Because the diameter of G is greater than 3, there are vertices u and v such that the distance in G between u and v is greater than 3. Either u or v, or both, is not in the set {a, b}. Assume that u is different from both a and b. Either {a, u} or {b, u} belongs to E; otherwise a, u, b would be a path in G of length 2. So, without loss of generality, assume {a, u} ∈ E. Thus v cannot be a or b, and by the same reasoning either {a, v} ∈ E or {b, v} ∈ E. In either case, this gives a path of length less than or equal to 3 from u to v in G, a contradiction. b) Suppose G = (V , E). Let a, b ∈ V . We must show that the distance between a and b in G does not exceed 3. If {a, b} ∈ E, the result follows, so assume that {a, b} ∈ E. Because the diameter of G is greater than or equal to 3, there exist vertices u and v such that the distance in G between u and v is greater than or equal to 3. Either u or v, or both, is not in the set {a, b}. Assume u is different from both a and b. Either {a, u} ∈ E or {b, u} ∈ E; otherwise a, u, b is a path of length 2 in G. So, without loss of generality, assume {a, u} ∈ E. Thus v is different from a and from b. If {a, v} ∈ E, then u, a, v is a path of length 2 in G, so {a, v} ∈ E and thus {b, v} ∈ E (or else there would be a path a, v, b of length 2 in G). Hence, {u, b} ∈ E; otherwise u, b, v is a path of length 2 in G. Thus, a, v, u, b is a path of length 3 in G, as desired. 55. a, b, e, z 57. a, c, d, f, g, z 59. If G is planar, then because e ≤ 3v − 6, G has at most 27 edges. (If G is not connected it has even fewer edges.) Similarly, G has at most 27 edges. But the union of G and G is K11 , which has 55 edges, and 55 > 27 + 27. 61. Suppose that G is colored with k colors and has independence number i. Because each color class must be an independent set, each color class has no more than i elements. Thus there are at most ki

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-69

vertices. 63. a) C(n, m)pm (1 âˆ’ p)nâˆ’m b) np c) To generate a labeled graph G, as we apply the process to pairs of vertices, the random number x chosen must be less than or equal to 1/2 when G has an edge between that pair of vertices and greater than 1/2 when G has no edge there. Hence, the probability of making the correct choice is 1/2 for each edge and 1/2C(n,2) overall. Hence, all labeled graphs are equally likely. 65. Suppose P is monotone increasing. If the property of not having P were not retained whenever edges are removed from a simple graph, there would be a simple graph G not having P and another simple graph G with the same vertices but with some of the edges of G missing that has P . But P is monotone increasing, so because G has P , so does G obtained by adding edges to G . This is a contradiction. The proof of the converse is similar.

CHAPTER 11 Section 11.1 1. (a), (c), (e) 3. a) a b) a, b, c, d, f , h, j , q, t c) e, g, i, k, l, m, n, o, p, r, s, u d) q, r e) c f) p g) f , b, a h) e, f , l, m, n 5. No 7. Level 0: a; level 1: b, c, d; level 2: e through k (in alphabetical order); level 3: l through r; level 4: s, t; level 5: u 9. a) The entire tree b) c, g, h, o, p and the four edges cg, ch, ho, hp c) e alone 11. a) 1 b) 2 13. a) 3 b) 9 15. a) The â€œonly ifâ€? part is Theorem 2 and the definition of a tree. Suppose G is a connected simple graph with n vertices and n âˆ’ 1 edges. If G is not a tree, it contains, by Exercise 14, an edge whose removal produces a graph G , which is still connected. If G is not a tree, remove an edge to produce a connected graph G . Repeat this procedure until the result is a tree. This requires at most n âˆ’ 1 steps because there are only n âˆ’ 1 edges. By Theorem 2, the resulting graph has n âˆ’ 1 edges because it has n vertices. It follows that no edges were deleted, so G was already a tree. b) Suppose that G is a tree. By part (a), G has nâˆ’1 edges, and by definition, G has no simple circuits. Conversely, suppose that G has no simple circuits and has n âˆ’ 1 edges. Let c equal the number of components of G, each of which is necessarily a tree, say with ni vertices, where ci=1 ni = n. By part (a), the total number of edges in c G is i=1 (ni âˆ’1) = nâˆ’c. Since we are given that this equals n âˆ’ 1, it follows that c = 1, i.e., G is connected and therefore satisfies the definition of a tree. 17. 9999 19. 2000 21. 999 23. 1,000,000 dollars 25. No such tree exists by Theorem 4 because it is impossible for m = 2 or m = 84.

27. Complete binary tree of height 4:

Complete 3-ary tree of height 3:

29. a) By Theorem 3 it follows that n = mi + 1. Because i +l = n, we have l = nâˆ’i, so l = (mi +1)âˆ’i = (mâˆ’1)i +1. b) We have n = mi + 1 and i + l = n. Hence, i = n âˆ’ l. It follows that n = m(n âˆ’ l) + 1. Solving for n gives n = (ml âˆ’ 1)/(m âˆ’ 1). From i = n âˆ’ l we obtain i = [(ml âˆ’ 1)/(m âˆ’ 1)] âˆ’ l = (l âˆ’ 1)/(m âˆ’ 1). 31. n âˆ’ t 33. a) 1 b) 3 c) 5 35. a) The parent directory b) A subdirectory or contained file c) A subdirectory or contained file in the same parent directory d) All directories in the path name e) All subdirectories and files continued in the directory or a subdirectory of this directory, and so on f) The length of the path to this directory or file g) The depth of the system, i.e., the length of the longest path 37. Let n = 2k , where k is a positive integer. If k = 1, there is nothing to prove because we can add two numbers with n âˆ’ 1 = 1 processor in log 2 = 1 step. Assume we can add n = 2k numbers in log n steps using a tree-connected network of n âˆ’ 1 processors. Let x1 , x2 , . . . , x2n be 2n = 2k+1 numbers that we wish to add. The tree-connected network of 2n âˆ’ 1 processors consists of the tree-connected network of n âˆ’ 1 processors together with two new processors as children of each leaf. In one step we can use the leaves of the larger network to find x1 + x2 , x3 + x4 , . . . , x2nâˆ’1 + x2n , giving us n numbers, which, by the inductive hypothesis, we can add in log n steps using the rest of the network. Because we have used log n + 1 steps and log(2n) = log 2 + log n = 1 + log n, this completes the proof. 39. c only 41. c and h 43. Suppose a tree T has at least two centers. Let u and v be distinct centers, both with eccentricity e, with u and v not adjacent. Because T is connected, there is a simple path P from u to v. Let c be any other vertex on this path. Because the eccentricity of c is at least e, there is a vertex w such that the unique simple path from c to w has length at least e. Clearly, this path cannot contain both u and v or else there would be a simple circuit. In fact, this path from c to w leaves P and does not return to P once it, possibly, follows part of P toward either u or v. Without loss of generality, assume this path does not follow P toward u. Then the path from u to c to w is simple and of length more than e, a contradiction. Hence, u and v are adjacent. Now because any two centers are adjacent, if there were more than two centers, T would contain K3 , a simple circuit, as a subgraph, which is a contradiction.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-70

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

45.

T1

T2

T3

T4

T6

T5

T7

47. The statement is that every tree with n vertices has a path of length n − 1, and it was shown only that there exists a tree with n vertices having a path of length n − 1.

Section 11.2 1.

banana

log3 13 = 3 weighings are needed. In fact, three weighings suffice. Start by putting coins 1, 2, and 3 on the left-hand side of the balance and coins 4, 5, and 6 on the right-hand side. If equal, apply Example 3 to coins 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12. If unequal, apply Example 3 to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. 11. The least number is five. Call the elements a, b, c, and d. First compare a and b; then compare c and d. Without loss of generality, assume that a < b and c < d. Next compare a and c. Whichever is smaller is the smallest element of the set. Again without loss of generality, suppose a < c. Finally, compare b with both c and d to completely determine the ordering. 13. The first two steps are shown in the text. After 22 has been identified as the second largest element, we replace the leaf 22 by −∞ in the tree and recalculate the winner in the path from the leaf where 22 used to be up to the root. Next, we see that 17 is the third largest element, so we repeat the process: replace the leaf 17 by −∞ and recalculate. Next, we see that 14 is the fourth largest element, so we repeat the process: replace the leaf 14 by −∞ and recalculate. Next, we see that 11 is the fifth largest element, so we repeat the process: replace the leaf 11 by −∞ and recalculate. The process continues in this manner. We determine that 9 is the sixth largest element, 8 is the seventh largest element, and 3 is the eighth largest element. The trees produced in all steps, except the second to last, are shown here. 17

peach

apple coconut

pear

11

17

mango 8

papaya

3. a) 3 b) 1 c) 4 d) 5

–⬁

9

17 8

14

3

17

11 –⬁

9

11

the

5.

14

quick brown

11

14 fox jumps

dog

8

9

14

11

over –⬁

lazy

7. At least log3 4 = 2 weighings are needed, because there are only four outcomes (because it is not required to determine whether the coin is lighter or heavier). In fact, two weighings suffice. Begin by weighing coin 1 against coin 2. If they balance, weigh coin 1 against coin 3. If coin 1 and coin 3 are the same weight, coin 4 is the counterfeit coin, and if they are not the same weight, then coin 3 is the counterfeit coin. If coin 1 and coin 2 are not the same weight, again weigh coin 1 against coin 3. If they balance, coin 2 is the counterfeit coin; if they do not balance, coin 1 is the counterfeit coin. 9. At least

8

–⬁

14

3

–⬁

9

11

11

11

8 –⬁

8 –⬁

8

–⬁

9 –⬁

3

11 9

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

–⬁

11

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-71

9

0

–⬁

8 –⬁

–⬁

8

w

9

8

0

3

–⬁

9

0

3

–⬁ –⬁

3

–⬁ –⬁

–⬁

–⬁

3

–⬁ –⬁

–⬁

–⬁

15. The value of a vertex is the list element currently there, and the label is the name (i.e., location) of the leaf responsible for that value. procedure tournament sort(a1 , . . . , an ) k := log n build a binary tree of height k for i := 1 to n set the value of the ith leaf to be ai and its label to be itself for i := n + 1 to 2k set the value of the ith leaf to be −∞ and its label to be itself for i := k − 1 downto 0 for each vertex v at level i set the value of v to the larger of the values of its children and its label to be the label of the child with the larger value for i := 1 to n ci := value at the root let v be the label of the root set the value of v to be −∞ while the label at the root is still v v := parent(v) set the value of v to the larger of the values of its children and its label to be the label of the child with the larger value {c1 , . . . , cn is the list in nonincreasing order} 17. k − 1, where n = 2k 19. a) Yes b) No c) Yes d) Yes 21. a: 000, e: 001, i: 01, k: 1100, o: 1101, p: 11110, u: 11111 23. a: 11; b: 101; c: 100; d: 01; e: 00; 2.25 bits (Note: This coding depends on how ties are broken, but the average number of bits is always the same.) 25. There are four possible answers in all, the one shown here and three more obtained from this one by swapping t and v and/or swapping u and w.

1

t

–⬁

3

–⬁

1 u

–⬁

9 –⬁

1

v

27. A:0001; B:101001; C:11001; D:00000; E:100; F:001100; G:001101; H:0101; I:0100; J:110100101; K:1101000; L:00001; M:10101; N:0110; O:0010; P:101000; Q:1101001000; R:1011; S:0111; T:111; U:00111; V:110101; W:11000; X:11010011; Y:11011; Z:1101001001 29. A:2; E:1; N:010; R:011; T:02; Z:00 31. n 33. Because the tree is rather large, we have indicated in some places to “see text.” Refer to Figure 9; the subtree rooted at these square or circle vertices is exactly the same as the corresponding subtree in Figure 9. First player wins. +1 32

22 see text +1

21 see text –1

2 –1

max

31

3

–1

1 –1

3

1 +1

min

–1

21 see text +1

11 see text +1

1 –1

1 –1

2 max +1

2 –1

1 min +1

1 –1

35. a) $1 b) $3 c) −$3 37. See the figures shown next. a) 0 b) 0 c) 1 d) This position cannot have occurred in a game; this picture is impossible.

a)

0

0

O X X X O O X

X O X O X X O

0

O X X X O O O X 0

b)

0

O X X X O O O X 0

+1

X O X O X X O O +1

0

X O X O X X O O 0

O X X X O O O X X

O X X X O O X O X

X O X O X X X O O

X O X O X X O X O

draw

draw

X wins

draw

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-72

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

+1

+1

c)

–1 X

X O O O X X

–1

+1

–2

X

–1

0

X X O O O X X

X O O O X X X X wins

X X O O O O X X

0

X X O O O X O X

+1

X O O O O X X X

O wins 0

+1

0

X X O O O X X O X

X O O O O X X X X

X X O O O X X O X

draw

X wins

draw

X

O

X

X O

X O

6 – 5 = 1 5 – 5 = 0 4 – 5 = –1 6 – 5 = 1 O X

O X

5–4=1

6–4=2

–2

0

X O O O X X O X

X O

X

+1

X O O O X X X

–1

X

X

X O X X X O O O 4 – 6 = –2 6 – 6 = 0 5 – 6 = –1 6 – 6 = 0 5 – 6 = –1 X O

39. Proof by strong induction: Basis step: When there are n = 2 stones in each pile, if first player takes two stones from a pile, then second player takes one stone from the remaining pile and wins. If first player takes one stone from a pile, then second player takes two stones from the other pile and wins. Inductive step: Assume inductive hypothesis that second player can always win if the game starts with two piles of j stones for all 2 ≤ j ≤ k, where k ≥ 2, and consider a game with two piles containing k + 1 stones each. If first player takes all the stones from one of the piles, then second player takes all but one stone from the remaining pile and wins. If first player takes all but one stone from one of the piles, then second player takes all the stones from the other pile and wins. Otherwise first player leaves j stones in one pile, where 2 ≤ j ≤ k, and k + 1 stones in the other pile. Second player takes the same number of stones from the larger pile, also leaving j stones there. At this point the game consists of two piles of j stones each. By the inductive hypothesis, the second player in that game, who is also the second player in our actual game, can win, and the proof by strong induction is complete. 41. 7; 49 43. Value of tree is 1. Note: The second and third trees are the subtrees of the two children of the root in the first tree whose subtrees are not shown because of space limitations. They should be thought of as spliced into the first picture.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

O 5–5=0

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-73

Section 11.3 0

1. 1

2

3

1.1 1.2 0 < 1 < 1.1 <1.2 < 2 < 3 0

3.

1.2.1 1.2.1.1

2.1

1.2

1.1

0 < 1 < 1.1 < 1.2 < 1.2.1 < 1.2.1.1 < 1.2.1.2 < 1.2.2 < 1.2.3 < 1.2.3.1 < 1.2.3.2 < 1.2.3.2.1 < 1.2.3.2.2 < 1.2.3.3 < 2 < 2.1

2

1

1.2.3

1.2.2

1.2.3.3 1.2.3.2

1.2.1.2 1.2.3.1 1.2.3.2.1

1.2.3.2.2

5. No 7. a, b, d, e, f, g, c 9. a, b, e, k, l, m, f, g, n, r, s, c, d, h, o, i, j, p, q 11. d, b, i, e, m, j, n, o, a, f, c, g, k, h, p, l 13. d, f, g, e, b, c, a 15. k, l, m, e, f, r, s, n, g, b, c, o, h, i, p, q, j, d, a +

17. a)

+ /

+ x

x

x

* x

27. Use mathematical induction. The result is trivial for a list with one element. Assume the result is true for a list with n elements. For the inductive step, start at the end. Find the sequence of vertices at the end of the list starting with the last leaf, ending with the root, each vertex being the last child of the one following it. Remove this leaf and apply the inductive hypothesis. 29. c, d, b, f, g, h, e, a in each case 31. Proof by mathematical induction. Let S(X) and O(X) represent the number of symbols and number of operators in the well-formed formula X, respectively. The statement is true for well-formed formulae of length 1, because they have 1 symbol and 0 operators. Assume the statement is true for all wellformed formulae of length less than n. A well-formed formula of length n must be of the form ∗XY , where ∗ is an operator and X and Y are well-formed formulae of length less than n. Then by the inductive hypothesis S(∗XY ) = S(X) + S(Y ) = [O(X) + 1] + [O(Y ) + 1] = O(X) + O(Y ) + 2. Because O(∗XY ) = 1 + O(X) + O(Y ), it follows that S(∗XY ) = O(∗XY ) + 1. 33. x y + z x ◦ + x ◦, xyz + + yx++, xyxy◦◦xy◦◦z◦+, xz×, zz+◦, yyyy◦◦◦, zx+yz+◦, for instance

y

y

+

y

Section 11.4

/

1. m − n + 1

x

*

3. a x

b

c d

b) ++x∗xy/xy, +x/+∗xyxy c) xxy∗+xy/+, xxy∗x+y/+ d) ((x + (x ∗ y)) + (x/y)), (x + (((x ∗ y) + x)/y))

f

e

c

g i

∪

∩

7. a) A

b d

f g

–

19. a)

a

5.

y

B

b)

–

A B

A

b) − ∩ A B ∪ A − B A d) ((A ∩ B) − (A ∪ (B − A))) d) 2205

c) A B ∩ A B A − ∪− 21. 14 23. a) 1 b) 1 c) 4

c)

a

25. b

c

d

e

d) f

e)

f)

j

g h i k

l

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

e j k

h l

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-74

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

9. a

b

f

g

a

b

f

g

a

b

f

g

a

b

f

g

c

d

e

h

c

d

e

h

c

d

e

h

c

d

e

h

a

b

f

g

a

b

f

g

a

b

f

g

a

b

f

g

c

d

e

h

c

d

e

h

c

d

e

h

c

d

e

h

a

b

f

g

a

b

f

g

a

b

f

g

a

b

f

g

c

d

e

h

c

d

e

h

c

d

e

h

c

d

e

h

a

b

f

g

a

b

f

g

a

b

f

g

a

b

f

g

c

d

e

h

c

d

e

h

c

d

e

h

c

d

e

h

11. a) 3 b) 16 c) 4 d) 5

13. a c

h

i

f

g

j

d

b

15.

e

g

h

q

i

a b

e

c

f

d

s

j l

o

r t

k n

p

m

17. a) A path of length 6 b) A path of length 5 c) A path of length 6 d) Depends on order chosen to visit the vertices; may be a path of length 7 19. With breadth-first search, the initial vertex is the middle vertex, and the n spokes are added to the tree as this vertex is processed. Thus, the resulting tree is K1,n . With depth-first search, we start at the vertex in the middle of the wheel and visit a neighborâ€”one of the vertices on the rim. From there we move to an adjacent vertex on the rim, and so on all the way around until we have reached every vertex. Thus, the resulting spanning tree is a path of length n. 21. With breadth-first search, we fan out from a vertex of degree m to all the vertices of degree n as the first step. Next, a vertex of degree n is processed, and the edges from it to all

the remaining vertices of degree m are added. The result is a K1,nâˆ’1 and a K1,mâˆ’1 with their centers joined by an edge. With depth-first search, we travel back and forth from one partite set to the other until we can go no further. If m = n or m = n âˆ’ 1, then we get a path of length m + n âˆ’ 1. Otherwise, the path ends while some vertices in the larger partite set have not been visited, so we back up one link in the path to a vertex v and then successively visit the remaining vertices in that set from v. The result is a path with extra pendant edges coming out of one end of the path. 23. A possible set of flights to discontinue are: Bostonâ€“New York, Detroitâ€“Boston, Bostonâ€“Washington, New Yorkâ€“Washington, New Yorkâ€“ Chicago, Atlantaâ€“Washington, Atlantaâ€“Dallas, Atlantaâ€“Los Angeles, Atlantaâ€“St. Louis, St. Louisâ€“Dallas, St. Louisâ€“ Detroit, St. Louisâ€“Denver, Dallasâ€“San Diego, Dallasâ€“Los Angeles, Dallasâ€“San Francisco, San Diegoâ€“Los Angeles, Los Angelesâ€“San Francisco, San Franciscoâ€“Seattle. 25. Proof by induction on the length of the path: If the path has length 0, then the result is trivial. If the length is 1, then u is adjacent to v, so u is at level 1 in the breadth-first spanning tree. Assume that the result is true for paths of length l. If the length of a path is l + 1, let u be the next-to-last vertex in a shortest path from v to u. By the inductive hypothesis, u is at level l in the breadth-first spanning tree. If u were at a level not exceeding l, then clearly the length of the shortest path from v to u would also not exceed l. So u has not been added to the breadth-first spanning tree yet after the vertices of level l have been added. Because u is adjacent to u , it will be added at level l + 1 (although the edge connecting u and u is not necessarily added). 27. a) No solution

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-75

b)

c)

29. Start at a vertex and proceed along a path without repeating vertices as long as possible, allowing the return to the start after all vertices have been visited. When it is impossible to continue along a path, backtrack and try another extension of the current path. 31. Take the union of the spanning trees of the connected components of G. They are disjoint, so the result is a forest. 33. m âˆ’ n + c 35. Assume that we wish to find the length of a shortest path from v1 to every other vertex of G using Algorithm 1. In line 2 of that algorithm, add L(v1 ) := 0, and add the following as a third step in the then clause at the end: L(w) := 1 + L(v). 37. Add an instruction to the BFS algorithm to mark each vertex as it is encountered. When BFS terminates we have found (all the vertices of) one component of the graph. Repeat, starting at an unmarked vertex, and continue in this way until all vertices have been marked. 39. Trees 41. Use depth-first search on each component. 43. If an edge uv is not followed while we are processing vertex u during the depth-first search process, then it must be the case that the vertex v had already been visited. There are two cases. If vertex v was visited after we started processing u, then, because we are not finished processing u yet, v must appear in the subtree rooted at u (and hence, must be a descendant of u). On the other hand, if the processing of v had already begun before we started processing u, then why wasnâ€™t this edge followed at that time? It must be that we had not finished processing v, in other words, that we are still forming the subtree rooted at v, so u is a descendant of v, and hence, v is an ancestor of u. 45. Certainly these two procedures produce the identical spanning trees if the graph we are working with is a tree itself, because in this case there is only one spanning tree (the whole graph). This is the only case in which that happens, however. If the original graph has any other edges, then by Exercise 43 they must be back edges and hence, join a vertex to an ancestor or descendant, whereas by Exercise 34, they must connect vertices at the same level or at levels that differ by 1. Clearly these two possibilities are mutually exclusive. Therefore there can be no edges other than tree edges if the two spanning trees are to be the same. 47. Because the edges not in the spanning tree are not followed in the process, we can ignore them. Thus we can assume that the graph was a rooted tree to begin with. The basis step is trivial (there is only one vertex), so we assume the inductive hypothesis that breadth-first search applied to trees with n vertices have their vertices visited in order of their level in the tree and consider a tree T with n + 1 vertices. The last vertex to be visited during breadth-first search of this tree, say v, is

the one that was added last to the list of vertices waiting to be processed. It was added when its parent, say u, was being processed. We must show that v is at the lowest (bottom-most, i.e., numerically greatest) level of the tree. Suppose not; say vertex x, whose parent is vertex w, is at a lower level. Then w is at a lower level than u. Clearly v must be a leaf, because any child of v could not have been seen before v is seen. Consider the tree T obtained from T by deleting v. By the inductive hypothesis, the vertices in T must be processed in order of their level in T (which is the same as their level in T , and the absence of v in T has no effect on the rest of the algorithm). Therefore u must have been processed before w, and therefore v would have joined the waiting list before x did, a contradiction. Therefore v is at the bottom-most level of the tree, and the proof is complete. 49. We modify the pseudocode given in Algorithm 2 by initializing m to be 0 at the beginning of the algorithm, and adding the statements â€œm := m + 1â€? and â€œassign m to vertex vâ€? after the statement that removes vertex v from L. 51. If a directed edge uv is not followed while we are processing its tail u during the depth-first search process, then it must be the case that its head v had already been visited. There are three cases. If vertex v was visited after we started processing u, then, because we are not finished processing u yet, v must appear in the subtree rooted at u (and hence, must be a descendant of u), so we have a forward edge. Otherwise, the processing of v must have already begun before we started processing u. If it had not yet finished (i.e., we are still forming the subtree rooted at v), then u is a descendant of v, and hence, v is an ancestor of u (we have a back edge). Finally, if the processing of v had already finished, then by definition we have a cross edge. 53. Let T be the spanning tree constructed in Figure 3 and T1 , T2 , T3 , and T4 the spanning trees in Figure 4. Denote by d(T , T ) the distance between T and T . Then d(T , T1 ) = 6, d(T , T2 ) = 4, d(T , T3 ) = 4, d(T , T4 ) = 2, d(T1 , T2 ) = 4, d(T1 , T3 ) = 4, d(T1 , T4 ) = 6, d(T2 , T3 ) = 4, d(T2 , T4 ) = 2, and d(T3 , T4 ) = 4. 55. Suppose e1 = {u, v} is as specified. Then T2 âˆŞ {e1 } contains a simple circuit C containing e1 . The graph T1 âˆ’ {e1 } has two connected components; the endpoints of e1 are in different components. Travel C from u in the direction opposite to e1 until you come to the first vertex in the same component as v. The edge just crossed is e2 . Clearly, T2 âˆŞ {e1 } âˆ’ {e2 } is a tree, because e2 was on C. Also T1 âˆ’ {e1 } âˆŞ {e2 } is a tree, because e2 reunited the two components.

57. Exercise 18:

Exercise 19:

Exercise 20:

a

b

a

b

a

b

c

d

c

d

d

e

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

c

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

a

Exercise 22:

b

c

a

Exercise 23:

b

c

c

f

b d

e

f

e

d

i e

a

l h

g

d

k

graph. Pick the one of these nâˆ’1 trees with the shortest length. 19. If all edges have different weights, then a contradiction is obtained in the proof that Primâ€™s algorithm works when an edge ek+1 is added to T and an edge e is deleted, instead of possibly producing another spanning tree. 21. a 2 b 3 c 1 d

j 3

1

e

f

g

4

2

4

j

00

$8

00

Chicago New York

$7

0 San Francisco $120 $900 Denver

Atlanta

7. {e, f }, {a, d}, {h, i}, {b, d}, {c, f }, {e, h}, {b, c}, {g, h} a 9. 1

1 1

b

c

11. Instead of choosing minimum-weight edges at each stage, choose maximum-weight edges at each stage with the same properties. 2 b 13. a 15. 3

4 3 c

3

e d

a e i 3

b

c

3

d

3

2

3 f j

3 4

h

g 4

4

k 3

3

2

l

3 3

m

n

o

p

17. First find a minimum spanning tree T of the graph G with n edges. Then for i = 1 to n âˆ’ 1, delete only the ith edge of T from G and find a minimum spanning tree of the remaining

k

l

25. a)

Chicago New York

$1200

San Francisco

$900 Denver

00

5.

h

23. Same as Kruskalâ€™s algorithm, except start with T := this set of edges and iterate from i = 1 to i = n âˆ’ 1 âˆ’ s, where s is the number of edges you start with.

Atlanta b

2

3

1. Deep Springsâ€“Oasis, Oasisâ€“Dyer, Oasisâ€“Silver Peak, Silver Peakâ€“Goldfield, Lidaâ€“Gold Point, Gold Pointâ€“Beatty, Lidaâ€“Goldfield, Goldfieldâ€“Tonopah, Tonopahâ€“Manhattan, Tonopahâ€“Warm Springs 3. {e, f }, {c, f }, {e, h}, {h, i}, {b, c}, {b, d}, {a, d}, {g, h}

3

1 i

b) a

Section 11.5

2

$7

59. First construct an Euler circuit in the directed graph. Then delete from this circuit every edge that goes to a vertex previously visited. 61. According to Exercise 60, a directed graph contains a circuit if and only if there are any back edges. We can detect back edges as follows. Add a marker on each vertex v to indicate what its status is: not yet seen (the initial situation), seen (i.e., put into T ) but not yet finished (i.e., visit(v) has not yet terminated), or finished (i.e., visit(v) has terminated). A few extra lines in Algorithm 1 will accomplish this bookkeeping. Then to determine whether a directed graph has a circuit, we just have to check when looking at edge uv whether the status of v is â€œseen.â€? If that ever happens, then we know there is a circuit; if not, then there is no circuit.

00

Exercise 21:

$8

S-76

c

1

e

2 3

f

1

d

3

h

g

2

3 1

3 i

j

k

l

27. By Exercise 24, at each stage of Sollinâ€™s algorithm a forest results. Hence, after n âˆ’ 1 edges are chosen, a tree results. It remains to show that this tree is a minimum spanning tree. Let T be a minimum spanning tree with as many edges in common with Sollinâ€™s tree S as possible. If T = S, then there is an edge e âˆˆ S âˆ’ T added at some stage in the algorithm, where prior to that stage all edges in S are also in T . T âˆŞ {e} contains a unique simple circuit. Find an edge e âˆˆ S âˆ’ T and an edge e âˆˆ T âˆ’ S on this circuit and â€œadjacentâ€? when viewing the trees of this stage as â€œsupervertices.â€? Then by the algorithm, w(e ) â‰¤ w(e ). So replace T by T âˆ’ {e } âˆŞ {e } to produce a minimum spanning tree closer to S than T was. 29. Each of the r trees is joined to at least one other tree by a new edge. Hence, there are at most r/2 trees in the result (each new tree contains two or more old trees). To accomplish this, we need to add r âˆ’ (r/2) = r/2 edges. Because the number of edges added is integral, it is at least r/2. 31. If k â‰Ľ log n, then n/2k â‰¤ 1, so n/2k = 1, so by Exercise 30 the algorithm is finished after at most log n iterations. 33. Suppose that a minimum spanning tree T contains edge e = uv that is the maximum weight edge in simple circuit C. Delete e from T . This creates a forest with two components, one containing u and the other containing v. Follow the edges of the path C âˆ’ e, starting at u. At some point this path must jump from the component of T âˆ’ e containing u to the component of T âˆ’ e containing v, say using edge f . This edge cannot be in T , because e can be the only edge of T joining the two components (otherwise there would be a simple circuit in T ). Because e is the edge of greatest weight in C, the

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-77

weight of f is smaller. The tree formed by replacing e by f in T therefore has smaller weight, a contradiction. 35. The reverse-delete algorithm must terminate and produce a spanning tree, because the algorithm never disconnects the graph and upon termination there can be no more simple circuits. The edge deleted at each stage of the algorithm must have been the edge of maximum weight in whatever circuits it was a part of. Therefore by Exercise 33 it cannot be in any minimum spanning tree. Since only edges that could not have been in any minimum spanning tree have been deleted, the result must be a minimum spanning tree.

Supplementary Exercises 1. Suppose T is a tree. Then clearly T has no simple circuits. If we add an edge e connecting two nonadjacent vertices u and v, then obviously a simple circuit is formed, because when e is added to T the resulting graph has too many edges to be a tree. The only simple circuit formed is made up of the edge e together with the unique path in T from v to u. Suppose T satisfies the given conditions. All that is needed is to show that T is connected, because there are no simple circuits in the graph. Assume that T is not connected. Then let u and v be in separate connected components. Adding e = {u, v} does not satisfy the conditions. 3. Suppose that a tree T has n vertices of degrees d1 , d2 , . . . , dn , respectively. Because 2e = ni=1 di n and e = n âˆ’ 1, we have 2(n âˆ’ 1) = i=1 di . Because each di â‰Ľ 1, it follows that 2(n âˆ’ 1) = n + ni=1 (di âˆ’ 1), or that n n âˆ’ 2 = i=1 (di âˆ’ 1). Hence, at most n âˆ’ 2 of the terms of this sum can be 1 or more. Hence, at least two of them are 0. It follows that di = 1 for at least two values of i. 5. 2n âˆ’ 2 7. A tree has no circuits, so it cannot have a subgraph homeomorphic to K3,3 or K5 . 9. Color each connected component separately. For each of these connected components, first root the tree, then color all vertices at even levels red and all vertices at odd levels blue. 11. Upper bound: k h ; lower bound: 2 k / 2 hâˆ’1 13. B0

B1

B2

B3

cause B0 had a root with degree 0, it follows by induction that Bk has a root with degree k. 19. S0

S1

S2

S3

S4

21. Use mathematical induction. The result is trivial for k = 0. Suppose it is true for k âˆ’1. Tkâˆ’1 is the parent tree for T . By induction, the child tree for T can be obtained from T0 , . . . , Tkâˆ’2 in the manner stated. The final connection of rkâˆ’2 to rkâˆ’1 is as stated in the definition of Sk -tree. 23. procedure level(T : ordered rooted tree with root r) queue := sequence consisting of just the root r while queue contains at least one term v := first vertex in queue list v remove v from queue and put children of v onto the end of queue 25. Build the tree by inserting a root for the address 0, and then inserting a subtree for each vertex labeled i, for i a positive integer, built up from subtrees for each vertex labeled i.j for j a positive integer, and so on. 27. a) Yes b) No c) Yes 29. The resulting graph has no edge that is in more than one simple circuit of the type described. Hence, it is a cactus. 31. a

b

c

d

e

f

33. a

b

d

e

i

b) 1

35. a) 1

4

2

3

c) 1

6

3

5 d) 3

2

4

f

h 3

5

B4

c

g 4

2 1

7

2

6

4 5

15. Because Bk+1 is formed from two copies of Bk , one shifted down one level, the height increases by 1 as k increases by 1. Because B0 had height 0, it follows by induction that Bk has height k. 17. Because the root of Bk+1 is the root of Bk with one additional child (namely the root of the other Bk ), the degree of the root increases by 1 as k increases by 1. Be-

37. 6 39. a) 0 for 00, 11 for 01, 100 for 10, 101 for 11 (exact coding depends on how ties were broken, but all versions are equivalent); 0.645n for string of length n b) 0 for 000, 100 for 001, 101 for 010, 110 for 100, 11100 for 011, 11101 for 101, 11110 for 110, 11111 for 111 (exact coding depends on how ties were broken, but all versions are equivalent); 0.5326n for string of length n 41. Let G be the graph obtained by delet-

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-78

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

ing from G the vertex v and all edges incident to v. A minimum spanning tree of G can be obtained by taking an edge of minimal weight incident to v together with a minimum spanning tree of G . 43. Suppose that edge e is the edge of least weight incident to vertex v, and suppose that T is a spanning tree that does not include e. Add e to T , and delete from the simple circuit formed thereby the other edge of the circuit that contains v. The result will be a spanning tree of strictly smaller weight (because the deleted edge has weight greater than the weight of e). This is a contradiction, so T must include e. 45. Because paths in trees are unique, an arborescence T of a directed graph G is just a subgraph of G that is a tree rooted at r, containing all the vertices of G, with all the edges directed away from the root. Thus the in-degree of each vertex other than r is 1. For the converse, it is enough to show that for each v âˆˆ V there is a unique directed path from r to v. Because the in-degree of each vertex other than r is 1, we can follow the edges of T backwards from v. This path can never return to a previously visited vertex, because that would create a simple circuit. Therefore the path must eventually stop, and it can stop only at r, whose in-degree is not necessarily 1. Following this path forward gives the path from r to v required by the definition of arborescence. 47. a) Run the breadth-first search algorithm, starting from v and respecting the directions of the edges, marking each vertex encountered as reachable. b) Running breadth-first search on Gconv , again starting at v, respecting the directions of the edges, and marking each vertex encountered, will identify all the vertices from which v is reachable. c) Choose a vertex v1 and using parts (a) and (b) find the strong component containing v1 , namely all vertices w such that w is reachable from v1 and v1 is reachable from w. Then choose another vertex v2 not yet in a strong component and find the strong component of v2 . Repeat until all vertices have been included. The correctness of this algorithm follows from the definition of strong component and Exercise 17 in Section 10.4.

CHAPTER 12 Section 12.1 1. a) 1 b) 1 c) 0 d) 0 3. a) (1 Âˇ 1) + (0 Âˇ 1 + 0) = 1 + (0 + 0) = 1 + (1 + 0) = 1 + 1 = 1 b) (T âˆ§ T) âˆ¨ (ÂŹ(F âˆ§ T) âˆ¨ F) â‰Ą T 5. a) x

y

z

1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0

c) x

y

z

xy + xyz

1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0

0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

110

7. a) 100

xy

y

z

x + yz

0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0

1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0

z

x(yz + y z)

1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0

1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

110

111

b) 100

101 010

011

000

111

100

111

100

101 010

011

000

001

110

d)

101 010

011

000

001

110

c)

y

101 010

001

011

000

001

9. (0, 0) and (1, 1) 11. x + xy = x Âˇ 1 + xy = x(1 + y) = x(y + 1) = x Âˇ 1 = x 13. x y

z xy yz xz

1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0

15. x

b) x

111

d) x

0 1 17. x 0 1

1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0

x+x

xÂˇx

0 1

0 1

x+1

xÂˇ0

1 1

0 0

xy + yz + xz 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0

xy yz xz 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0

0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

xy + yz + xz 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-79

19.

x+ (x + y) x y z y + z (y + z) x + y +z yz x(yz) xy (xy)z 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0

1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0

1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

hypotheses, Exercise 35, and the distributive law it follows that x = x ∨ 0 = x ∨ (x ∨ y) = (x ∨ x) ∨ y = x ∨ y = 0. Similarly, y = 0. To prove the second statement, note that x = x ∧ 1 = x ∧ (x ∧ y) = (x ∧ x) ∧ y = x ∧ y = 1. Similarly, y = 1. 43. Use Exercises 39 and 41 in the Supplementary Exercises in Chapter 9 and the definition of a complemented, distributed lattice to establish the five pairs of laws in the definition.

Section 12.2 21.

x

y

xy

(xy)

x

y

x+y

x+y

(x + y)

xy

1 1 0 0

1 0 1 0

1 0 0 0

0 1 1 1

0 0 1 1

0 1 0 1

0 1 1 1

1 1 1 0

0 0 0 1

0 0 0 1

23. 0 · 0 = 0 · 1 = 0; 1 · 1 = 1 · 0 = 0 25.

x y x ⊕ y x + y xy (xy) (x + y)(xy) xy xy xy + xy 1 1 0 0

1 0 1 0

0 1 1 0

1 1 1 0

1 0 0 0

0 1 1 1

0 1 1 0

0 1 0 0

0 0 1 0

0 1 1 0

27. a) True, as a table of values can show b) False; take x = 1, y = 1, z = 1, for instance c) False; take x = 1, y = 1, z = 0, for instance 29. By De Morgan’s laws, the complement of an expression is like the dual except that the complement of each variable has been taken. 31. 16 33. If we replace each 0 by F, 1 by T, Boolean sum by ∨, Boolean product by ∧, and by ¬ (and x by p and y by q so that the variables look like they represent propositions, and the equals sign by the logical equivalence symbol), then xy = x + y becomes ¬(p ∧ q) ≡ ¬p ∨ ¬q and x + y = x y becomes ¬(p ∨ q) ≡ ¬p ∧ ¬q. 35. By the domination, distributive, and identity laws, x ∨x = (x ∨x)∧1 = (x ∨x)∧(x ∨x) = x ∨ (x ∧ x) = x ∨ 0 = x. Similarly, x ∧ x = (x ∧ x) ∨ 0 = (x ∧ x) ∨ (x ∧ x) = x ∧ (x ∨ x) = x ∧ 1 = x. 37. Because 0 ∨ 1 = 1 and 0 ∧ 1 = 0 by the identity and commutative laws, it follows that 0 = 1. Similarly, because 1 ∨ 0 = 1 and 1∧0 = 1, it follows that 1 = 0. 39. First, note that x ∧0 = 0 and x ∨ 1 = 1 for all x, as can easily be proved. To prove the first identity, it is sufficient to show that (x ∨ y) ∨ (x ∧ y) = 1 and (x ∨ y) ∧ (x ∧ y) = 0. By the associative, commutative, distributive, domination, and identity laws, (x ∨ y)∨(x ∧y) = y ∨ [x ∨ (x ∧ y)] = y ∨ [(x ∨ x) ∧ (x ∨ y)] = y ∨ [1 ∧ (x ∨ y)] = y ∨ (x ∨ y) = (y ∨ y) ∨ x = 1 ∨ x = 1 and (x ∨ y) ∧ (x ∧ y) = y ∧ [ x ∧ (x ∨ y)] = y ∧ [(x ∧ x) ∨ (x ∧ y)] = y ∧ [0 ∨(x ∧ y)] = y ∧ (x ∧ y) = x ∧ (y ∧ y) = x ∧0 = 0. The second identity is proved in a similar way. 41. Using the

1. a) x yz b) xyz c) xyz d) x y z 3. a) xyz + xyz + xyz + xy z + xyz + xyz + x yz b) xyz + xyz + xyz c) xyz + xyz + xyz + xy z d) xyz + xy z 5. wxyz + wxyz + wxyz + wxyz + wxy z + w x yz + w xyz + wx y z 7. a) x + y + z b) x + y + z c) x + y + z 9. y1 + y2 + · · · + yn = 0 if and only if yi = 0 for i = 1, 2, . . . , n. This holds if and only if xi = 0 when yi = xi and xi = 1 when yi = x i . 11. a) x + y + z b) (x + y + z) (x + y + z)(x + y + z)(x + y + z)(x + y + z) c) (x + y + z)(x + y + z)(x + y + z)(x + y + z) d) (x + y + z) (x + y + z) (x + y + z) (x + y + z) (x + y + z) (x + y + z) 13. a) x + y + z b) x + [y + (x + z)] c) (x + y) d) [x + (x + y + z)] 15. a) x

x

x↓x

1 0

0 1

0 1

b) x

y

xy

x↓x

y↓y

(x ↓ x) ↓ (y ↓ y)

1 1 0 0

1 0 1 0

1 0 0 0

0 0 1 1

0 1 0 1

1 0 0 0

c) x

y

x+y

(x ↓ y)

(x ↓ y) ↓ (x ↓ y)

1 1 0 0

1 0 1 0

1 1 1 0

0 0 0 1

1 1 1 0

17. a) {[(x | x) | (y | y)] | [(x | x) | (y | y)]} | (z | z) b) {[(x | x) | (z | z)] | y} | {[(x | x) | (z | z)] | y} c) x d) [x | (y | y)] | [x | (y | y)] 19. It is impossible to represent x using + and · because there is no way to get the value 0 if the input is 1.

Section 12.3 1. (x + y)y 3. (xy) + (z + x) (x + y + z) + (x + y + z)

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

5. (x + y + z) +

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-80

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

v w x

11.

vwx

7. v

x y bi x y bi x y bi x y bi

vwy

w y v w z v x y v x z

vwz

v y z

vyz

w x y w x z

wxy

w y z

wyz

x y z

xyz

vwx + vwy + vwz + vxy + vxz + vyz + wxy + wxz + wyz + xyz

vxy

d

vxz x y bi x y bi x y bi x y bi

wxz

bi+1

13. x1 y1 x1 y1 x1 x1 y1 + x0 y0(x1 y1 + x1 y1)

y1 x0 y0

15. a) x x

x

b) x x

9.

x0 y0

x+y

s0

HA

y y

x1 y1

s1

FA

c) x y

x2 y2

s2

FA

xy x

x3 y3

y

s3

FA

d)

x4 y4

FA

x5 y5

s4 FA

x y x

s5 s6

HA = half adder FA = full adder

x

x y y

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

y

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-81

17.

7. a)

yz

yz

yz

x

x Circuit from 15 (d)

y

Sum = x

y

1

x

b) Circuit from 15 (c)

yz

yz

yz

yz

yz

x Carry = xy

x

19. c0 c1 x3

c)

c0 c1 x2 c0 c1 x1

x

1

1

yz

yz

1

1

yz

yz 1

x

c0 c1 x0

1

9. Implicants: xyz, xyz, x y z, xyz, xy, xz, yz; prime implicants: xy, xz, yz; essential prime implicants: xy, xz, yz

Section 12.4 1. a)

y

y

b) xy and x y

x

yz

yz

yz

1

1

1

yz

x

x x

3. a)

1

y x

y 1

x

b)

y x

1

c)

y

1

y

y

x

1

1

x

1

1

11. The 3-cube on the right corresponds to w; the 3-cube given by the top surface of the whole figure represents x; the 3-cube given by the back surface of the whole figure represents y; the 3-cube given by the right surfaces of both the left and the right 3-cube represents z. In each case, the opposite 3-face represents the complemented literal. The 2-cube that represents wz is the right face of the 3-cube on the right; the 2-cube that represents xy is bottom rear; the 2-cube that represents y z is front left. wxyz

wxyz x

1

wxyz

wxyz

5. a)

yz

yz

yz

yz

wxyz

wxyz wxyz

x

wxyz wxyz

x

wxyz

1

b) xyz, x y z, xyz

wx yz

wxyz

wxyz wxyz

wxyz

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

wxyz

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-82

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

13. a)

yz

yz

yz

d)

yz

x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3 x 4 x 5 wx

x 1x 2

1

1

wx

x 1x 2

1

1

wx

x 1x 2

1

1

x 1x 2

1

1

1

wx

e) b) wxyz, w xyz, wxy z, wxy z

x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3 x 4 x 5

x 1x 2

1

1

1

1

x 1x 2

1

1

1

1

x 1x 2

1

1

1

1

x 1x 2

1

1

1

1

15. a) x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 1x 2

1

1

x 1x 2

f)

x 1x 2

x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3 x 4 x 5

x 1x 2

1

1

1

1

x 1x 2

1

1

1

1

x 1x 2

1

1

1

1

x 1x 2

1

1

1

1

x 1x 2

b) x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 1x 2

17. a) 64 b) 6 19. Rows 1 and 4 are considered adjacent. The pairs of columns considered adjacent are: columns 1 and 4, 1 and 12, 1 and 16, 2 and 11, 2 and 15, 3 and 6, 3 and 10, 4 and 9, 5 and 8, 5 and 16, 6 and 15, 7 and 10, 7 and 14, 8 and 13, 9 and 12, 11 and 14, 13 and 16.

x 1x 2 x 1x 2

1

1

x 1x 2

1

1

21. Smith

Jones Adams

c) x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3x 4 x 5 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 1x 2

1

1

1

1 Marcus Adams Burton

x 1x 2 x 1x 2 x 1x 2

Smith Jones Burton

1

1

1

1

23. a) xz b) y c) xz + xz + yz d) xz + xy + y z 25. a) wxz + wxy + wyz + wxyz b) xyz + w yz + wxyz + wxyz + w xyz c) yz + wxy + wx y + w xyz d) wy + yz + xy + wxz + w xz 27. x(y + z)

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-83

13.

29. z y x w z y x

x

y

x y

x⊕y

(x ⊕ y)

1 1 0 0

1 0 1 0

1 0 0 1

0 1 1 0

1 0 0 1

15. Yes, as a truth table shows

z y x

17. a) 6 b) 5 c) 5 d) 6

19. x y

z w

Sum = x 䊝 y

Carry = xy

31. x z+xz 33. We use induction on n. If n = 1, then we are looking at a line segment, labeled 0 at one end and 1 at the other end. The only possible value of k is also 1, and if the literal is x1 , then the subcube we have is the 0-dimensional subcube consisting of the endpoint labeled 1, and if the literal is x 1 , then the subcube we have is the 0-dimensional subcube consisting of the endpoint labeled 0. Now assume that the statement is true for n; we must show that it is true for n + 1. If the literal xn+1 (or its complement) is not part of the product, then by the inductive hypothesis, the product when viewed in the setting of n variables corresponds to an (n − k)-dimensional subcube of the n-dimensional cube, and the Cartesian product of that subcube with the line segment [0, 1] gives us a subcube one dimension higher in our given (n + 1)-dimensional cube, namely having dimension (n+1)−k, as desired. On the other hand, if the literal xn+1 (or its complement) is part of the product, then the product of the remaining k − 1 literals corresponds to a subcube of dimension n − (k − 1) = (n + 1) − k in the n-dimensional cube, and that slice, at either the 1-end or the 0-end in the last variable, is the desired subcube.

Supplementary Exercises 1. a) x = 0, y = 0, z = 0; x = 1, y = 1, z = 1 b) x = 0, y = 0, z = 0; x = 0, y = 0, z = 1; x = 0, y = 1, z = 0; x = 1, y = 0, z = 1; x = 1, y = 1, z = 0; x = 1, y = 1, n−1 z = 1 c) No values 3. a) Yes b) No c) No d) Yes 5. 22 7. a) If F (x1 , . . . , xn ) = 1, then (F + G)(x1 , . . . , xn ) = F (x1 , . . . , xn ) + G(x1 , . . . , xn ) = 1 by the dominance law. Hence, F ≤ F + G. b) If (F G)(x1 , . . . , xn ) = 1, then F (x1 , . . . , xn ) · G(x1 , . . . , xn ) = 1. Hence, F (x1 , . . . , xn ) = 1. It follows that F G ≤ F . 9. Because F (x1 , . . . , xn ) = 1 implies that F (x1 , . . . , xn ) = 1, ≤ is reflexive. Suppose that F ≤ G and G ≤ F . Then F (x1 , . . . , xn ) = 1 if and only if G(x1 , . . . , xn ) = 1. This implies that F = G. Hence, ≤ is antisymmetric. Suppose that F ≤ G ≤ H . Then if F (x1 , . . . , xn ) = 1, it follows that G(x1 , . . . , xn ) = 1, which implies that H (x1 , . . . , xn ) = 1. Hence, F ≤ H , so ≤ is transitive. 11. a) x = 1, y = 0, z = 0 b) x = 1, y = 0, z = 0 c) x = 1, y = 0, z = 0

21. x3 + x2 x 1 23. Suppose it were with weights a and b. Then there would be a real number T such that xa + yb ≥ T for (1,0) and (0,1), but with xa + yb < T for (0,0) and (1,1). Hence, a ≥ T , b ≥ T , 0 < T , and a + b < T . Thus, a and b are positive, which implies that a + b > a ≥ T , a contradiction.

CHAPTER 13 Section 13.1 1. a) sentence ⇒ noun phrase intransitive verb phrase ⇒ article adjective noun intransitive verb phrase ⇒ article adjective noun intransitive verb ⇒ . . . (after 3 steps) . . . ⇒ the happy hare runs. b) sentence ⇒ noun phrase intransitive verb phrase ⇒ article adjective noun intransitive verb phrase ⇒ article adjective noun intransitive verb adverb…(after 4 steps)…⇒ the sleepy tortoise runs quickly c) sentence ⇒ noun phrase transitive verb phrase noun phrase ⇒ article noun transitive verb phrase noun phrase ⇒ article noun transitive verb noun phrase ⇒ article noun transitive verb article noun ⇒ . . . (after 4 steps)…⇒ the tortoise passes the hare d) sentence ⇒ noun phrase transitive verb phrase noun phrase ⇒ article adjective noun transitive verb phrase noun phrase ⇒ article adjective noun transitive verb noun phrase ⇒ article adjective noun transitive verb article adjective noun ⇒ . . . (after 6 steps)…⇒ the sleepy hare passes the happy tortoise 3. The only way to get a noun, such as tortoise, at the end is to have a noun phrase at the end, which can be achieved only via the production sentence → noun phrase transitive verb phrase noun phrase. However, transitive verb phrase → transitive verb → passes, and this sentence does not contain passes. 5. a) S ⇒ 1A ⇒ 10B ⇒ 101A ⇒ 1010B ⇒ 10101 b) Because of the productions in this grammar, every 1 must be followed by a 0 unless it occurs at the end of the string. c) All strings consisting of a 0 or a 1 followed by one or more repetitions of 01

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-84

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

7. S ⇒ 0S1 ⇒ 00S11 ⇒ 000S111 ⇒ 000111 9. a) S ⇒ 0S ⇒ 00S ⇒ 00S1 ⇒ 00S11 ⇒ 00S111 ⇒ 00S1111 ⇒ 001111 b) S ⇒ 0S ⇒ 00S ⇒ 001A ⇒ 0011A ⇒ 00111A ⇒ 001111 11. S ⇒ 0SAB ⇒ 00SABAB ⇒ 00ABAB ⇒ 00 AABB ⇒ 001ABB ⇒ 0011BB ⇒ 00112B ⇒ 001122 13. a) S → 0, S → 1, S → 11 b) S → 1S, S → λ c) S → 0A1, A → 1A, A → 0A, A → λ d) S → 0A, A → 11A, A → λ 15. a) S → 00S, S → λ b) S → 10A, A → 00A, A → λ c) S → AAS, S → BBS, AB → BA, BA → AB, S → λ, A → 0, B → 1 d) S → 0000000000A, A → 0A, A → λ e) S → AS, S → ABS, S → A, AB → BA, BA → AB, A → 0, B → 1 f) S → ABS, S → λ, AB → BA, BA → AB, A → 0, B → 1 g) S → ABS, S → T , S → U , T → AT , T → A, U → BU , U → B, AB → BA, BA → AB, A → 0, B → 1 17. a) S → 0S, S → λ b) S → A0, A → 1A, A → λ c) S → 000S, S → λ 19. a) Type 2, not type 3 b) Type 3 c) Type 0, not type 1 d) Type 2, not type 3 e) Type 2, not type 3 f) Type 0, not type 1 g) Type 3 h) Type 0, not type 1 i) Type 2, not type 3 j) Type 2, not type 3 21. Let S1 and S2 be the start symbols of G1 and G2 , respectively. Let S be a new start symbol. a) Add S and productions S → S1 and S → S2 . b) Add S and production S → S1 S2 . c) Add S and production S → λ and S → S1 S.

sentence

23. a)

noun phrase

intransitive verb phrase

article

adjective

noun

intransitive verb

the

happy

hare

runs

sentence

b)

noun phrase

sentence

c)

noun phrase

intransitive verb phrase

article

adjective

noun

intransitive verb

the

sleepy

tortoise

runs

adverb article

quickly

the

transitive verb phrase

noun phrase

noun

transitive verb

article

noun

tortoise

passes

the

hare

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-85

d)

sentence

noun phrase

transitive verb phrase

noun phrase

article

adjective

noun

transitive verb

article

adjective

noun

the

sleepy

hare

passes

the

happy

tortoise

25. a) Yes b) No c) Yes d) No

27.

signed integer

sign

–

integer

digit

1

integer

digit

integer

0

digit

9

29. a) S → "sign#"integer# S → "sign#"integer# . "positive integer# "sign# → + "sign# → − "integer# → "digit# "integer# → "integer#"digit# "digit# → i, i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0 "positive integer# → "integer#"nonzero digit# "positive integer# → "nonzero digit#"integer# "positive integer# → "integer#"nonzero digit# "integer# "positive integer# → "nonzero digit# "nonzero digit# → i, i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 b) "signed decimal number# ::= "sign#"integer# | "sign#"integer# . "positive integer# "sign# ::= +|− "integer# ::= "digit# | "integer#"digit# "digit# ::= 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9

"nonzero digit# ::= 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 "positive integer# ::= "integer#"nonzero digit# | "nonzero digit#"integer# | "integer# "nonzero integer#"integer# | "nonzero digit# signed decimal number

c)

integer

sign

–

positive integer

integer

digit

nonzero digit

digit

1

4

3

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-86

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

31. a) "identifier# ::= "lcletter# | "identifier#"lcletter# "lcletter# ::= a | b | c | · · · | z b) "identifier# ::= "lcletter#"lcletter#"lcletter# | "lcletter#"lcletter#"lcletter#"lcletter# | "lcletter#"lcletter#"lcletter#"lcletter#"lcletter# | "lcletter#"lcletter#"lcletter#"lcletter#"lcletter#"lcletter# "lcletter# ::= a | b | c | · · · | z c) "identifier# ::= "ucletter# | "ucletter#"letter# | "ucletter#"letter#"letter# | "ucletter#"letter#"letter#"letter# | "ucletter#"letter#"letter#"letter#"letter# | "ucletter#"letter#"letter#"letter#"letter#"letter# "letter# ::= "lcletter# | "ucletter# "lcletter# ::= a | b | c | · · · | z "ucletter# ::= A | B | C | · · · | Z d) "identifier# ::= "lcletter#"digitorus#"alphanumeric#"alphanumeric#"alphanumeric# | "lcletter#"digitorus#"alphanumeric#"alphanumeric#"alphanumeric#"alphanumeric# "digitorus# ::= "digit# | _ "alphanumeric# ::= "letter# | "digit# "letter# ::= "lcletter# | "ucletter# "lcletter# ::= a | b | c | · · · | z "ucletter# ::= A | B | C | · · · | Z "digit# ::= 0 | 1 | 2 | · · · | 9 33. "identifier# ::= "letterorus# | "identifier#"symbol# "letterorus# ::= "letter# | _ "symbol# ::= "letterorus# | "digit# "letter# ::= "lcletter# | "ucletter# "lcletter# ::= a | b | c | · · · | z "ucletter# ::= A | B | C | · · · | Z "digit# ::= 0 | 1 | 2 | · · · | 9 35. numeral ::= sign? nonzerodigit digit∗ decimal? | sign? 0 decimal? sign ::= + | − nonzerodigit ::= 1 | 2 | · · · | 9 digit ::= 0 | nonzerodigit decimal ::= .digit∗ 37. identifier ::= letterorus symbol∗ letterorus ::= letter | _ symbol ::= letterorus | digit letter ::= lcletter | ucletter lcletter ::= a | b | c | · · · | z ucletter ::= A | B | C | · · · | Z digit ::= 0 | 1 | 2 | · · · | 9 39. a) "expression# "term#"term#"addOperator# "factor#"factor#"factor#"mulOperator#"addOperator# "identifier#"identifier#"identifier#"mulOperator#"addOperator# abc∗+ b) Not generated c) "expression# "term# "factor#"factor#"mulOperator# "expression#"factor#"mulOperator# "term#"term#"addOperator#"factor#"mulOperator# "factor#"factor#"addOperator#"factor#"mulOperator# "identifier#"identifier#"addOperator#"identifier#"mulOperator# x y −z∗

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-87

d) "expression# "term# "factor#"factor#"mulOperator# "factor#"expression#"mulOperator# "factor#"term#"mulOperator# "factor#"factor#"factor#"mulOperator#"mulOperator# "factor#"factor#"expression#"mulOperator#"mulOperator# "factor#"factor#"term#"term#"addOperator#"mulOperator#"mulOperator# "factor#"factor#"factor#"factor#"addOperator#"mulOperator#"mulOperator# "identifier#"identifier#"identifier#"identifier#"addOperator#"mulOperator#"mulOperator# wx y z−∗/ e) "expression# "term# "factor#"factor#"mulOperator# "factor#"expression#"mulOperator# "factor#"term#"term#"addOperator#"mulOperator# "factor#"factor#"factor#"addOperator#"mulOperator# "identifier#"identifier#"identifier#"addOperator#"mulOperator# ad e−∗ 41. a) Not generated b) "expression# "term#"addOperator#"term# "factor#"mulOperator#"factor#"addOperator#"factor#"mulOperator#"factor# "identifier#"mulOperator#"identifier#"addOperator#"identifier#"mulOperator#"identifier# a/b + c/d c) "expression# "term# "factor#"mulOperator#"factor# "factor#"mulOperator#("expression#) "factor#"mulOperator#("term#"addOperator#"term#) "factor#"mulOperator#("factor#"addOperator#"factor#) "identifier#"mulOperator#("identifier#"addOperator#"identifier#) m ∗ (n + p) d) Not generated e) "expression# "term# "factor#"mulOperator#"factor# ("expression#)"mulOperator#("expression#) ("term#"addOperator#"term#)"mulOperator#("term#"addOperator#"term#)

("factor#"addOperator#"factor#)"mulOperator#("factor#"addOp

("identifier#"addOperator#"identifier#)"mulOperator#("identifier#"addOperator#"identifier#) (m + n) ∗ (p − q)

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-88

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

Section 13.2

1. a)

1, 1

,0

1, 0

b)

s1

0 0, 1, 0 0, 0 1, 1

s0

1, 0

0, 0

0

Start

c)

s0

Start

s1

s1

0, 1

1,

1 0,

s2

0

s4

1, 0

3. a) 01010 b) 01000 c) 11011

5. a) 1100 b) 00110110 c) 11111111111

7.

25, 0

25, 0

25, 5

25, 10

25, 15

25, 20

25, 0 10,0 Start

s0

5, 0

10,0 5, 0

s1

10, 0 5, 0

s2

s3

10, 0 5, 0

s4

10, 0 5, 0

25, 25

10, 0 5, 0

s5

s6

5, 0

s7

10, 5 x, 0

x, 0

x, 0

x, 0

x, 0

x, 0

10, 10 5, 5

x, 0

x ĺƒ†{ , , } x, soda

pop

= cola = root beer = ginger ale

9.

0, 0

a s3

q,

0, 1

s1 c

,0

v,

b

0

0

Start

1,

1, 0

0, 1

s0

s3 x, c

i,

0

1

0,

s0

1,

Start

p,

s1

11.

b

s4

a

1, 0

x,

s2

s2 1, 1 v = Valid ID i = Invalid ID p = Valid password q = Invalid password

a = "Enter user ID" b = "Enter password" c = Prompt x = Any input

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

1

0

1, 1 s3

0, 0 0, 1 1

1 0, 1

0,

1,

1,

s0

Start

1,

0, 1

s2

s2

0 0,

1, 1

s3

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-89

13.

{5, 10, 25}, open

10, nothing

Start

5, nothing

s0

10, nothing

5, nothing

s1

10, nothing

5, nothing

s2

5, nothing

s3

s4

25, open 25, open

25, open 10, open 25, open

15. Let s0 be the start state and let s1 be the state representing a successful call. From s0 , inputs of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 send the machine back to s0 with output of an error message for the user. From s0 an input of 0 sends the machine to state s1 , with the output being that the 0 is sent to the network. From s0 an input of 9 sends the machine to state s2 with no output; from there an input of 1 sends the machine to state s3 with no output; from there an input of 1 sends the machine to state s1 with the output being that the 911 is sent to the network. All other inputs while in states s2 or s3 send the machine back to s0 with output of an error message for the user. From s0 an input of 1 sends the machine to state s4 with no output; from s4 an input of 2 sends the machine to state s5 with no output; and this path continues in a similar manner to the 911 path, looking next for 1, then 2, then any seven digits, at which point the machine goes to state s1 with the output being that the ten-digit input is sent to the network. Any â€œincorrectâ€? input while in states s5 or s6 (that is, anything except a 1 while in s5 or a 2 while in s6 ) sends the machine back to s0 with output of an error message for the user. Similarly, from s4 an input of 8 followed by appropriate successors drives us eventually to s1 , but inappropriate outputs drive us back to s0 with an error message. Also, inputs while in state s4 other than 2 or 8 send the machine back to state s0 with output of an error message for the user. 17.

1, 0

s1

s5

0,0 0, 0

s0 1,

1, 1

0

s2

0, 0

1, 0

Start

0

s3

0, 0

0,

0, 0

s4

0, 0

1, 1

s6

1, 0 1, 0

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-90

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

19.

R, 1

Σ – {C}, 0 Start

C, 0

s0

s1

O, 0

s2

M, 0

s3

P, 0

U, 0

s4

s5

T, 0

E, 0

s6

s7

Σ – {M}, 0 Σ – {P}, 0 Σ – {O}, 0

Σ – {U}, 0 Σ – {T}, 0 Σ – {E}, 0 Σ – {R}, 0

21. State s0 s1 s2

f Input 0 1

g

s1 s1 s1

1 1 0

s2 s0 s2

23. a) 11111 b) 1000000 c) 100011001100

25. 1 Start

1

0

s1

1

0

s0

1 1

1

0 s3

0 s2 0

0

Section 13.3 1. a) {000,001,1100,1101} b) {000,0011,010,0111} c) {00, 011, 110, 1111} d) {000000, 000001, 000100, 000101, 010000, 010001, 010100, 010101} 3. A = {1, 101}, B = {0,11,000}; A = {10,111,1010,1000,10111,101000}, B = {λ}; A = {λ, 10}, B = {10, 111, 1000} or A = {λ}, B = {10, 111, 1010, 1000, 10111, 101000} 5. a) The set of strings consisting of zero or more consecutive bit pairs 10 b) The set of strings consisting of all 1s such that the number of 1s is divisible by 3, including the null string c) The set of strings in which every 1 is immediately preceded by a 0 d) The set of strings that begin and end with a 1 and have at least two 1s between every pair of 0s 7. A string is in A∗ if and only if it is a concatenation of an arbitrary number of strings in A. Because each string in A is also in B, it follows that a string in A∗ is also a concatenation of strings in B. Hence, A∗ ⊆ B ∗ . 9. a) Yes b) Yes c) No d) No e) Yes f) Yes 11. a) Yes b) No c) Yes d) No 13. a) Yes b) Yes c) No d) No e) No f) No 15. We use structural induction on the input string y. The basis step considers y = λ, and for the inductive step we write y = wa, where w ∈ I ∗ and a ∈ I . For the basis step, we have xy = x, so we must show that f (s, x) = f (f (s, x), λ). But part (i) of the definition of the extended transition function says that this is true. We then assume the inductive

hypothesis that the equation holds for w and prove that f (s, xwa) = f (f (s, x), wa). By part (ii) of the definition, the left-hand side of this equation equals f (f (s, xw), a). By the inductive hypothesis, f (s, xw) = f (f (s, x), w), so f (f (s, xw), a) = f (f (f (s, x), w), a). The righthand side of our desired equality is, by part (ii) of the definition, also equal to f (f (f (s, x), w), a), as desired. 17. {0, 10, 11}{0, 1}∗ 19. {0m 1n | m ≥ 0 and n ≥ 1} 21. {λ} ∪ {0}{1} ∗ {0} ∪ {10,11}{0, 1} ∗ ∪ {0}{1} ∗ {01}{0, 1}∗ ∪ {0}{1}∗ {00}{0}∗ {1}{0, 1}∗ 23. Let s2 be the only final state, and put transitions from s2 to itself on either input. Put a transition from the start state s0 to s1 on input 0, and a transition from s1 to s2 on input 1. Create state s3 , and have the other transitions from s0 and s1 (as well as both transitions from s3 ) lead to s3 . 25. Start state s0 , only final state s3 ; transitions from s0 to s0 on 0, from s0 to s1 on 1, from s1 to s2 on 0, from s1 to s1 on 1, from s2 to s0 on 0, from s2 to s3 on 1, from s3 to s3 on 0, from s3 to s3 on 1 27. Have five states, with only s3 final. For i = 0, 1, 2, 3, transition from si to itself on input 1 and to si+1 on input 0. Both transitions from s4 are to itself. 29. Have four states, with only s3 final. For i = 0, 1, 2, transition from si to si+1 on input 1 but back to s0 on input 0. Both transitions from s3 are to itself.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-91

53. Add a nonfinal state s3 with transitions to s3 from s0 on input 0, from s1 on input 1, and from s3 on input 0 or 1.

31. Start

1

s0

s1

1

s2

1

55. a) Start

s1

0

0

0

0

s0 1

0

s3

s4

0, 1

s2 1

0

0

0, 1

1

b) Start s5

0, 1

1

s0

1

s1

s6

0 s2

33. Start state s0 , only final state s1 ; transitions from s0 to s0 on 1, from s0 to s1 on 0, from s1 to s1 on 1; from s1 to s0 on 0

0

0, 1 1

s4

0, 1

0, 1

s3

35. Start

0

s0

s1

1 s2

1

1

c) Start

1

0

0

1

0

0, 1

s3

s0

s1

0

1

s2

0

s3

37. Suppose that such a machine exists, with start state s0 and other state s1 . Because the empty string is not in the language but some strings are accepted, we must have s1 as the only final state, with at least one transition from s0 to s1 . Because the string 0 is not in the language, the transition from s0 on input 0 must be to itself, so the transition from s0 on input 1 must be to s1 . But this contradicts the fact that 1 is not in the language. 39. Change each final state to a nonfinal state and vice versa. 41. Same machine as in Exercise 25, but with s0 , s1 , and s2 as the final states 43. {0,01,11} 45. {λ,0} ∪ {0m 1n | m ≥ 1, n ≥ 1} 47. {10n | n ≥ 0} ∪ {10n 10m | n, m ≥ 0} 49. The union of the set of all strings that start with a 0 and the set of all strings that have no 0s

51. Start

0

s0

s1 0, 1

1 s2

s5

1 1

0, 1

0 0, 1

s3

0

s4

0,1

57. Suppose that M is a finite-state automaton that accepts the set of bit strings containing an equal number of 0s and 1s. Suppose M has n states. Consider the string 0n+1 1n+1 . By the pigeonhole principle, as M processes this string, it must encounter the same state more than once as it reads the first n+1 0s; so let s be a state it hits at least twice. Then k 0s in the input takes M from state s back to itself for some positive integer k. But then M ends up exactly at the same place after reading 0n+1+k 1n+1 as it will after reading 0n+1 1n+1 . Therefore, because M accepts 0n+1 1n+1 it also accepts 0n+k+1 1n+1 , which is a contradiction. 59. We know from Exercise 58d that the equivalence classes of Rk are a refinement of the equivalence classes of Rk−1 for each positive integer k. The equivalence classes are finite sets, and finite sets cannot be refined indefinitely (the most refined they can be is for each equivalence class to contain just one state). Therefore this sequence of refinements must remain unchanged from some point onward. It remains to show that as soon as we have Rn = Rn+1 , then Rn = Rm for all m > n, from which it follows that Rn = R∗ , and so the equivalence classes for these two relations will be the same. By induction, it suffices to show that if Rn = Rn+1 , then Rn+1 = Rn+2 . Suppose that Rn+1 = Rn+2 . This means that there are states s and t that are (n + 1)-equivalent but not

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-92

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

(n + 2)-equivalent. Thus there is a string x of length n + 2 such that, say, f (s, x) is final but f (t, x) is nonfinal. Write x = aw, where a âˆˆ I . Then f (s, a) and f (t, a) are not (n + 1)-equivalent, because w drives the first to a final state and the second to a nonfinal state. But f (s, a) and f (t, a) are n-equivalent, because s and t are (n + 1)-equivalent. This contradicts the fact that Rn = Rn+1 . 61. a) By the way the machine M was constructed, a string will drive M from the start state to a final state if and only if that string drives M from the start state to a final state. b) For a proof of this theorem, see a source such as Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation (2nd Edition) by John E. Hopcroft, Rajeev Motwani, and Jeffrey D. Ullman (Addison-Wesley, 2000).

Section 13.4 1. a) Any number of 1s followed by a 0 b) Any number of 1s followed by one or more 0s c) 111 or 001 d) A string of any number of 1s or 00s or some of each in a row e) Îť or a string that ends with a 1 and has one or more 0s before each 1 f) A string of length at least 3 that ends with 00 3. a) No b) No c) Yes d) Yes e) Yes f) No g) No h) Yes 5. a) 0 âˆŞ 11 âˆŞ 010 b) 000000âˆ— c) (0 âˆŞ 1)((0 âˆŞ 1)(0 âˆŞ 1))âˆ— d) 0âˆ— 10âˆ— e) (1 âˆŞ 01 âˆŞ 001)âˆ— 7. a) 00âˆ— 1 b) (0 âˆŞ 1)(0 âˆŞ 1)(0 âˆŞ 1)âˆ— 0000âˆ— c) 0âˆ— 1âˆ— âˆŞ 1âˆ— 0âˆ— d) 11(111)âˆ— (00)âˆ— 9. a) Have the start state s0 , nonfinal, with no transitions. b) Have the start state s0 , final, with no transitions. c) Have the nonfinal start state s0 and a final state s1 and the transition from s0 to s1 on input a. 11. Use an inductive proof. If the regular expression for A is âˆ…, Îť, or x, the result is trivial. Otherwise, suppose the regular expression for A is BC. Then A = BC where B is the set generated by B and C is the set generated by C. By the inductive hypothesis there are regular expressions B and C that generate B R and C R , respectively. Because AR = (BC)R = C R B R , C B is a regular expression for AR . If the regular expression for A is B âˆŞ C, then the regular expression for AR is B âˆŞ C because (B âˆŞ C)R = (B R ) âˆŞ (C R ). Finally, if the regular expression for A is Bâˆ— , then it is easy to see that (B )âˆ— is a regular expression for AR .

13. a)

0 Start

s0

s1

1 0

s2

0

s3

s4

1

s5

1

0

0 0

1

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-93

0

b)

0 s2

0

s3

0 Start

s0

1

1

1

s1

0

1 1 1

s4

1

s5

s6

s7

1

1

1

1 0

c) 0 s1

0

1 s2

s3

s4

1

s5

1

0

s10

0

0 Start

s0

0 0 0 s6

0

s7

s8

s9 0

0

0

0 s11

15. S → 0A, S → 1B, S → 0, A → 0B, A → 1B, B → 0B, B → 1B 17. S → 0C, S → 1A, S → 1, A → 1A, A → 0C, A → 1, B → 0B, B → 1B, B → 0, B → 1, C → 0C, C → 1B, C → 1. 19. This follows because input that leads to a final state in the automaton corresponds uniquely to a derivation in the grammar. 21. The “only if” part is clear because I is finite. For the “if” part let the states be si0 , si1 , si2 , . . . , sin , where n = l(x). Because n ≥ |S|, some state is repeated by the pigeonhole principle. Let y be the part of x that causes the loop, so that x = uyv and y sends sj to sj , for some j . Then uy k v ∈ L(M) for all k. Hence, L(M) is infinite. 23. Suppose that L = {02n 1n , n = 0, 1, 2 . . .} were regular. Let S be the set of states of a finite-state machine recognizing this set. Let z = 02n 1n where 3n ≥ |S|. Then by the pumping lemma, z = 02n 1n = uvw, l(v) ≥ 1, and uvi w ∈ {02n 1n | n ≥ 0}. Obviously v cannot contain both 0 and 1, because v2 would then contain 10. So v is all 0s or all 1s, and hence, uv2 w contains too many 0s or too many 1s, so it is not in L. This contradiction shows that L is not regular. 25. Suppose that the set of palindromes over {0, 1}

1

s12

were regular. Let S be the set of states of a finite-state machine recognizing this set. Let z = 0n 10n , where n > |S|. Apply the pumping lemma to get uvi w ∈ L for all nonnegative integers i where l(v) ≥ 1, and l(uv) ≤ |S|, and z = 0n 10n = uvw. Then v must be a string of 0s (because n > |S|), so uv2 w is not a palindrome. Hence, the set of palindromes is not regular. 27. Let z = 1; then 111 ∈ / L but 101 ∈ L, so 11 and 10 are distinguishable. For the second question, the only way for 1z to be in L is for z to end with 01, and that is also the only way for 11z to be in L, so 1 and 11 are indistinguishable. 29. This follows immediately from Exercise 28, because the n distinguishable strings must drive the machine from the start state to n different states. 31. Any two distinct strings of the same length are distinguishable with respect to the language P of all palindromes, because if x and y are distinct strings of length n, then xx R ∈ P but yx R ∈ / P . Because there are 2n different strings of length n, Exercise 29 tells us that any deterministic finite-state automaton for recognizing palindromes must have at least 2n states. Because n is arbitrary, this is impossible.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-94

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

Section 13.5 1. a) The nonblank portion of the tape contains the string 1111 when the machine halts. b) The nonblank portion of the tape contains the string 011 when the machine halts. c) The nonblank portion of the tape contains the string 00001 when the machine halts. d) The nonblank portion of the tape contains the string 00 when the machine halts. 3. a) The machine halts (and accepts) at the blank following the input, having changed the tape from 11 to 01. b) The machine changes every other occurrence of a 1, if any, starting with the first, to a 0, and otherwise leaves the string unchanged; it halts (and accepts) when it comes to the end of the string. 5. a) Halts with 01 on the tape, and does not accept b) The first 1 (if any) is changed to a 0 and the others are left alone. The input is not accepted. 7. (s0 , 0, s1 , 1, R), (s0 , 1, s0 , 1, R) 9. (s0 , 0, s0 , 0, R), (s0 , 1, s1 , 1, R), (s1 , s1 , 0, R), (s1 , 1, s1 , 0, R) 11. (s0 , 0, s1 , 0, R), (s0 , 1, s0 , 0, R), (s1 , 0, s1 , 0, R), (s1 , 1, s0 , 0, R), 13. (s0 , 0, s0 , 0, R), (s0 , 1, s1 , 1, R), (s1 , B, s2 , B, R) (s1 , 0, s1 , 0, R), (s1 , 1, s0 , 1, R), (s0 , B, s2 , B, R) 15. If the input string is blank or starts with a 1 the machine halts in nonfinal state s0 . Otherwise, the initial 0 is changed to an M and the machine skips past all the intervening 0s and 1s until it either comes to the end of the input string or else comes to an M. At this point, it backs up one square and enters state s2 . Because the acceptable strings must have a 1 at the right for each 0 at the left, there must be a 1 here if the string is acceptable. Therefore, the only transition out of s2 occurs when this square contains a 1. If it does, the machine replaces it with an M and makes its way back to the left; if it does not, the machine halts in nonfinal state s2 . On its way back, it stays in s3 as long as it sees 1s, then stays in s4 as long as it sees 0s. Eventually either it encouters a 1 while in s4 at which point it halts without accepting or else it reaches the rightmost M that had been written over a 0 at the start of the string. If it is in s3 when this happens, then there are no more 0s in the string, so it had better be the case that there are no more 1s either; this is accomplished by the transitions (s3 , M, s5 , M, R) and (s5 , M, s6 , M, R), and s6 is a final state. Otherwise the machine halts in nonfinal state s5 . If it is in s4 when this M is encountered, things start all over again, except now the string will have had its leftmost remaining 0 and its rightmost remaining 1 replaced by Ms. So the machine moves, staying in state s4 , to the leftmost remaining 0 and goes back into state s0 to repeat the process. 17. (s0 , B, s9 , B, L), (s0 , 0, s1 , 0, L), (s1 , B, s2 , E, R), (s2 , M, s2 , M, R), (s2 , 0, s3 , M, R), (s3 , 0, s3 , 0, R), (s3 , M, s3 , M, R), (s3 , 1, s4 , M, R), (s4 , 1, s4 , 1, R), (s4 , M, s4 , M, R), (s4 , 2, s5 , M, R), (s5 , 2, s5 , 2, R), (s5 , B, s6 , B, L), (s6 , M, s8 , M, L), (s6 , 2, s7 , 2, L), (s7 , 0, s7 , 0, L), (s7 , 1, s7 , 1, L), (s7 , 2, s7 , 2, L), (s7 , M, s7 , M, L), (s7 , E, s2 , E, R), (s8 , M, s8 , M, L), (s8 , E, s9 , E, L) where M and E are markers, with E marking the left end of the input

19. (s0 , 1, s1 , B, R), (s1 , 1, s2 , B, R), (s2 , 1, s3 , B, R), (s3 , 1, s4 , 1, R), (s1 , B, s4 , 1, R), (s2 , B, s4 , 1, R), (s3 , B, s4 , 1, R) 21. (s0 , 1, s1 , B, R), (s1 , 1, s2 , B, R), (s1 , B, s6 , B, R), (s2 , 1, s3 , B, R), (s2 , B, s6 , B, R), (s3 , 1, s4 , B, R), (s3 , B, s6 , B, R), (s4 , 1, s5 , B, R), (s4 , B, s6 , B, R), (s6 , B, s10 , 1, R), (s5 , 1, s5 , B, R), (s5 , B, s7 , 1, R), (s7 , B, s8 , 1, R), (s8 , B, s9 , 1, R), (s9 , B, s10 , 1, R) 23. (s0 , 1, s0 , 1, R), (s0 , B, s1 , B, L), (s1 , 1, s2 , 0, L), (s2 , 0, s2 , 0, L), (s2 , 1, s3 , 0, R), (s2 , B, s6 , B, R), (s3 , 0, s3 , 0, R), (s3 , 1, s3 , 1, R), (s3 , B, s4 , 1, R), (s4 , B, s5 , 1, L), (s5 , 1, s5 , 1, L), (s5 , 0, s2 , 0, L), (s6 , 0, s6 , 1, R), (s6 , 1, s7 , 1, R), (s6 , B, s7 , B, R) 25. (s0 , 0, s0 , 0, R), (s0 , ∗, s5 , B, R), (s3 , ∗, s3 , ∗, L), (s3 , 0, s3 , 0, L), (s3 , 1, s3 , 1, L), (s3 , B, s0 , B, R), (s5 , 1, s5 , B, R), (s5 , 0, s5 , B, R), (s5 , B, s6 , B, L), (s6 , B, s6 , B, L), (s6 , 0, s7 , 1, L), (s7 , 0, s7 , 1, L), (s0 , 1, s1 , 0, R), (s1 , 1, s1 , 1, R), (s1 , ∗, s2 , ∗, R), (s2 , 0, s2 , 0, R), (s2 , 1, s3 , 0, L), (s2 , B, s4 , B, L), (s4 , 0, s4 , 1, L), (s4 , ∗, s8 , B, L), (s8 , 0, s8 , B, L), (s8 , 1, s8 , B, L) 27. Suppose that sm is the only halt state for the Turing machine in Exercise 22, where m is the largest state number, and suppose that we have designed that machine so that when the machine halts the tape head is reading the leftmost 1 of the answer. Renumber each state in the machine for Exercise 18 by adding m to each subscript, and take the union of the two sets of five-tuples. 29. a) No b) Yes c) Yes d) Yes 31. (s0 , B, s1 , 1, L), (s0 , 1, s1 , 1, R), (s1 , B, s0 , 1, R)

Supplementary Exercises 1. a) S → 00S111, S → λ b) S → AABS, AB → BA, BA → AB, A → 0, B → 1, S → λ c) S → ET , T → 0T A, T → 1T B, T → λ, 0A → A0, 1A → A1, 0B → B0, 1B → B1, EA → E0, EB → E1, E → λ 3.

S

S

S

A

A

A

A

B (

A

B

( (

B

B (

(

(

A

(

B

(

B (

(

A

B

(

(

(

A

A

B

B (

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

(

( (

(

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-95

S

5.

19.

S

0,1

S

0

S

S

0

0

S

{s0, s1, s2, s3}

0 0

0

0

0

0 1

{s0, s1, s2,}

0

1

1

{s0, s1, s3,}

1

{s0, s2, s3,}

{s1, s2, s3,}

0 0

7. No, take A = {1, 10} and B = {0, 00}. 9. No, take A = {00, 000, 00000} and B = {00, 000}. 11. a) 1 b) 1 c) 2 d) 3 e) 2 f) 4

0 0

{s0, s1}

0

{s0, s2}

{s0, s3}

{s1, s2}

{s1, s3}

0 1

11

1

{s2, s3} 1

1 0 Start

Start

s0 1, 0

0, 0

s1 1, 0

s2 1, 0

0, 0

0, 0

s3 1, 1

0, 0

1

s0

1

s1

0

s2

0

1

s3

0

0

Start

1

s0

b) Start 1

0

s0

s1

0, 0

s2

s3

1, 1

1

s0 1

0

s2

s3

25. a) Start s0

s1 0

0

1

1

s2

s3

1

0

s1

0

s2

23. Construct the deterministic finite automaton for A with states S and final states F . For A use the same automaton but with final states S âˆ’ F .

0, 0

1

s0

1

1, 1 0, 0

Start

s5

0

1 1

0, 1

s4

s4

0, 0

0, 0

s2

1 Start

1, 0

{s3}

1 s4

15. 1, 0

0

s1

c)

1, 0

1

0

21. a)

s1

Start

{s2}

0, 1

0, 1

1

1

{s1}

1

s4

1 Start

1

{s0}

1

0

0

1, 1

13.

0

s4

1

s0

0

s1 1

1

0

0

s2

1

s3

1

0 0 0

s4

0 1

s6

1 s5

17. a) nnk+1 mnk b) nnk+1 mn

0, 1

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

0

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH S-96

Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises

APPENDIXES

b) 0

s1 1 Start

1

s2

s3

Appendix 1

1

s0

1 0

0 0

s4

1

0

s5

s6

1

s7

0

c)

0 Start

s0

0

s1

0

1

0

1

0

s3

s4

1

1

s2 1

0

s5 1 0

s6

0

s7

0

s8

1

0

1

0

1

s9

s10

1

1

0

s11 1 0

s12

0

s13

0

s14

1

0

1

0

1

s15

s16

1

1

s18 1

0

s19 1

0

s17 1 0

s20 0, 1

27. Suppose that L = {1p | p is prime} is regular, and let S be the set of states in a finite-state automaton recognizing L. Let z = 1p where p is a prime with p > |S| (such a prime exists because there are infinitely many primes). By the pumping lemma it must be possible to write z = uvw with l(uv) â‰¤ |S|, l(v) â‰Ľ 1, and for all nonnegative integers i, uvi w âˆˆ L. Because z is a string of all 1s, u = 1a , v = 1b , and w = 1c , where a + b + c = p, a + b â‰¤ n, and b â‰Ľ 1. This means that uvi w = 1a 1bi 1c = 1(a+b+c)+b(iâˆ’1) = 1p+b(iâˆ’1) . Now take i = p+1. Then uvi w = 1p(1+b) . Because p(1+b) is not prime, uvi w âˆˆ L, which is a contradiction. 29. (s0 , âˆ—, s5 , B, L), (s0 , 0, s0 , 0, R), (s0 , 1, s1 , 0, R), (s1 , âˆ—, s2 , âˆ—, R), (s1 , 1, s1 , 1, R), (s2 , 0, s2 , 0, R), (s2 , 1, s3 , 0, L), (s2 , B, s4 , B, L), (s3 , âˆ—, s3 , âˆ—, L), (s3 , 0, s3 , 0, L), (s3 , 1, s3 , 1, L), (s3 , B, s0 , B, R), (s4 , âˆ—, s8 , B, L), (s4 , 0, s4 , B, L), (s5 , 0, s5 , B, L), (s5 , B, s6 , B, R), (s6 , 0, s7 , 1, R), (s6 , B, s6 , B, R), (s7 , 0, s7 , 1, R), (s7 ,1,s7 , 1, R), (s8 , 0, s8 , 1, L), (s8 , 1, s8 ,1,L)

1. Suppose that 1 is also a multiplicative identity for the real numbers. Then, by definition, we have both 1 Âˇ 1 = 1 and 1 Âˇ 1 = 1 , so 1 = 1. 3. For the first part, it suffices to show that [(âˆ’x) Âˇ y] + (x Âˇ y) = 0, because Theorem 2 guarantees that additive inverses are unique. Thus [(âˆ’x) Âˇ y] + (x Âˇ y) = (âˆ’x + x) Âˇ y (by the distributive law) = 0 Âˇ y (by the inverse law) = y Âˇ 0 (by the commutative law) = 0 (by Theorem 5). The second part is almost identical. 5. It suffices to show that [(âˆ’x) Âˇ (âˆ’y)] + [âˆ’(x Âˇ y)] = 0, because Theorem 2 guarantees that additive inverses are unique: [(âˆ’x) Âˇ (âˆ’y)] + [âˆ’(x Âˇ y)] = [(âˆ’x) Âˇ (âˆ’y)] + [(âˆ’x) Âˇ y] (by Exercise 3) = (âˆ’x) Âˇ [(âˆ’y) + y] (by the distributive law) = (âˆ’x) Âˇ 0 (by the inverse law) = 0 (by Theorem 5). 7. By definition, âˆ’(âˆ’x) is the additive inverse of âˆ’x. But âˆ’x is the additive inverse of x, so x is the additive inverse of âˆ’x. Therefore âˆ’(âˆ’x) = x by Theorem 2. 9. It suffices to show that (âˆ’x âˆ’ y) + (x + y) = 0, because Theorem 2 guarantees that additive inverses are unique: (âˆ’x âˆ’ y) + (x + y) = [(âˆ’x) + (âˆ’y)] + (x + y) (by definition of subtraction) = [(âˆ’y) + (âˆ’x)] + (x + y) (by the commutative law) = (âˆ’y) + [(âˆ’x) + (x + y)] (by the associative law) = (âˆ’y) + [(âˆ’x + x) + y] (by the associative law) = (âˆ’y) + (0 + y) (by the inverse law) = (âˆ’y) + y (by the identity law) = 0 (by the inverse law). 11. By definition of division and uniqueness of multiplicative inverses (Theorem 4) it suffices to prove that [(w/x) + (y/z)] Âˇ (x Âˇ z) = w Âˇ z + x Âˇ y. But this follows after several steps, using the distributive law, the associative and commutative laws for multiplication, and the definition that division is the same as multiplication by the inverse. 13. We must show that if x > 0 and y > 0, then x Âˇ y > 0. By the multiplicative compatibility law, the commutative law, and Theorem 5, we have x Âˇ y > 0 Âˇ y = 0. 15. First note that if z < 0, then âˆ’z > 0 (add âˆ’z to both sides of the hypothesis). Now given x > y and âˆ’z > 0, we have x Âˇ (âˆ’z) > y Âˇ (âˆ’z) by the multiplicative compatibility law. But by Exercise 3 this is equivalent to âˆ’(x Âˇ z) > âˆ’(y Âˇ z). Then add x Âˇ z and y Âˇ z to both sides and apply the various laws in the obvious ways to yield x Âˇ z < y Âˇ z. 17. The additive compatibility law tells us that w + y < x + y and (together with the commutative law) that x + y < x + z. By the transitivity law, this gives the desired conclusion. 19. By Theorem 8, applied to 1/x in place of x, there is an integer n (necessarily positive, because 1/x is positive) such that n > 1/x. By the multiplicative compatibility law, this means that nÂˇx > 1. 21. We must show that if (w, x) âˆź (w , x ) and (y, z) âˆź (y , z ), then (w + y, x + z) âˆź (w + y , x + z ) and that (wÂˇy +x Âˇz, x Âˇy +wÂˇz) âˆź (w Âˇ y +x Âˇ z , x Âˇy +w Âˇ z ). Thus we are given that w+x = x +w and that y +z = z+y , and we want to show that w +y +x +z = x +z +w +y and that wÂˇy+xÂˇz+x Âˇy +w Âˇz = xÂˇy+wÂˇz+w Âˇy +x Âˇz . For the first of the desired conclusions, add the two given equations.

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises S-97

For the second, rewrite the given equations as w âˆ’ x = w âˆ’ x and y âˆ’ z = y âˆ’ z , multiply them, and do the algebra.

Appendix 2 1. a) 23 b) 26 c) 24

3. a) 2y b) 2y/3 c) y/2

Appendix 3 1. After the first block is executed, a has been assigned the original value of b and b has been assigned the original value of c, whereas after the second block is executed, b is assigned the original value of c and a the original value of c as well. 3. The following construction does the same thing. i := initial value while i â‰¤ final value statement i := i + 1

5. 8 6 4 2 âˆ’2

âˆ’1

0

1

2

1

2

1

2

(a) 8 6 4 2 âˆ’2

âˆ’1

0

(b) 8 6 4 2 âˆ’2

âˆ’1

0

(c)

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Photo Credits CHAPTER 1

Page 2: © National Library of Medicine; p. 5: Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division [LC-USZ62-61664]; p. 11: © University Archives. Department of Rare Books and Special Collections. Princeton University Library; p. 20: Courtesy Indiana University Archives; p. 29: By permission of the London Mathematical Society; p. 31: © Mary Evans Picture Library; p. 34: Imaging Department © President and Fellows of Harvard College: Mabel Lisle Ducasse. Henry Maurice Sheffer (1883-1964), 20th century Pastel on paper; sight: 60.9 x 46.9 cm (24 x 18 1/2 in.) Harvard Art Museums/Fogg Art Museum, Harvard University Portrait Collection, Department of Philosophy, CNA1; p. 38: © Bettman/Corbis; p. 50: © The Granger Collection, New York; p. 97, 98: © Master and Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge.

CHAPTER 2

Page 117: Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division [LC-USZ62-74393]; p. 119: Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division [LC-USZ62-49535]; p. 120: © The Royal Society; p. 122: Scientists and Inventors Portrait File Collection, Archives Center, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution; p. 163: Courtesy Neil Sloane and AT&T Shannon Lab; p. 171: © AIP Emilio Segre Visual Archives, Lande Collection.

CHAPTER 3

Page 192: © from THE SCIENTISTS OF THE ANCIENT WORLD, by Anderson/ Stephenson. pg. 90. Illustration by Marie le Glatin Keis; p. 207(top): Bachmann, Paul. Die Arithmetik Der Quadratischen Formen. Verlag und Druck von BG Teubner. Leipzig. Berlin. 1923; p. 207(bottom): Smith Collection, Rare Book & Manuscript Library, Columbia University in the City of New York; p. 208: © Stanford University News Service; p. 227: Photo courtesy of Dr. Stephen Cook/Photo by Yvonne Heath.

CHAPTER 4

Page 241: Scientists and Inventors Portrait File Collection, Archives Center, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution; p. 259: From Math Tutor Archive; p. 261: © Mary Evans Picture Library; p. 263: © Reed Hutchinson/UCLA; p. 267: Scientists and Inventors Portrait File Collection, Archives Center, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution; p. 269: © Académie des sciences-Institut de France; p. 282: From A History of Science, Technology and Philosophy in the 16th and 17th Centuries, by Abraham Wolf. Reprinted by permission of Harper Collins Publishers Ltd. © Abraham Wolf; p. 283: © The Mathematical Association of America 2011. All rights reserved; p. 299: © David Meyer, ZDNet UK; p. 300(top): Courtesy Ronald L. Rivest; p. 300(middle): © Kristen Tsolis; p. 300(bottom): Courtesy Leonard Adleman.

CHAPTER 5

Page 348: © The Granger Collection, New York; p. 349: © Mary Evans Picture Library; p. 374: Courtesy Tony Hoare; p. 381: © Matthew Naythons/TimePix/Getty Images.

CHAPTER 6

Page 400: © The Granger Collection, New York; p. 419: © National Library of Medicine.

CHAPTER 7

Page 446: © Roger-Viollet/The Image Works; p. 447: From A Concise History of Mathematics by Dirk Struik, 1967, Dover Publications; p. 459: © The Granger Collection, New York; p. 472: Courtesy Stephen Stigler; p. 489: © Académie des sciences-Institut de France; p. 490: Smith Collection, Rare Book & Manuscript Library, Columbia University in the City of New York.

CHAPTER 8

Page 507: © KIK-IRPA, Brussels;

p. 404: Courtesy Mrs. Jane Burch;

p. 508: Photo courtesy of SIAM. C-1

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH C-2

Photo Credits

CHAPTER 9

Page 604: Courtesy Stephen Warshall; Society.

p. 623: © Deutsches Museum;

p. 636: © The Royal

CHAPTER 10

Page 660: © The Royal Society; p. 695: Scientists and Inventors Portrait File Collection, Archives Center, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution; p. 700: © Master and Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge; p. 701(top): © Rosemarie Dirac; p. 701(bottom): © Reverence to University History Photobase; p. 706: Julius Petersen: Metoder og Teorier. Edition no. 6, Det Schoenbergske Forlag, Copenhagen 1912. Photo courtesy Bjarne Toft; p. 710: Courtesy, Edsger W. Dijkstra; p. 723: Courtesy, the Archive of Polish Mathematicians, at the Institute of Mathematics of the Polish Academy of Sciences; p. 728: By permission of the London Mathematical Society.

CHAPTER 11

Page 750: © Master and Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge; p. 763: Courtesy, California State University, Santa Cruz; p. 782: Courtesy, the Archive of Polish Mathematicians, at the Institute of Mathematics of the Polish Academy of Sciences; p. 798: Courtesy, Robert Clay Prim; p. 800: Courtesy Joseph B. Kruskal. Photo by Rachel Kruskal.

CHAPTER 12

Page 812: Courtesy MIT Museum; p. 830: Courtesy Maurice Karnaugh; Edward J. McCluskey; p. 839: Courtesy the Quine Family.

CHAPTER 13

Page 853: © Donna Coveney/MIT; p. 854(top): Courtesy IBM, Almaden Research Center; p. 854(bottom): Courtesy Peter Naur; p. 867: Photo from I Have a Photographic Memory by Paul Halmos (1987), American Mathematical Society; p. 872: © Bettman/Corbis; p. 886: © Science Photo Library/Photo Researchers, Inc.; p. 897: © University Archives. Department of Rare Books and Special Collections. Princeton University Library.

APPENDIX 1

Page A-4: © Hulton-Deutsch Collection/Corbis.

p. 837: Courtesy

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Index of Biographies Ada, Augusta (Countess of Lovelace), 31 Adleman, Leonard, 300 al-Khowarizmi, Abu Ja‘far Mohammed Ibn Musa, 192 Archimedes, A–4 Aristotle, 2 Bachmann, Paul Gustav Heinrich, 207 Backus, John, 854 Bayes, Thomas, 472 Bellman, Richard, 508 Bernoulli, James, 459 Bézout, Étienne, 269 Bienaymé, Irenée-Jules, 489 Boole, George, 5 Cantor, Georg, 117 Cardano, Girolamo, 446 Carmichael, Robert Daniel, 283 Carroll, Lewis (Charles Dodgson), 50 Catalan, Eugène Charles, 507 Cayley, Arthur, 750 Chebyshev, Pafnuty Lvovich, 490 Chomsky, Avram Noam, 853 Church, Alonzo, 897 Cocks, Clifford, 299 Cook, Stephen, 227 De Morgan, Augustus, 29 Descartes, René, 122 Dijkstra, Edsger Wybe, 710 Dirac, Gabriel Andrew, 701 Dirichlet, G. Lejeune, 500 Dodgson, Charles (Lewis Carroll), 50 Eratosthenes, 259 Erd˝os, Paul, 636 Euclid, 267 Euler, Leonhard, 695 Fermat, Pierre de, 282 Fibonacci, 348 Gauss, Karl Friedrich, 241 Goldbach, Christian, 264 Hall, Philip, 660 Hamilton, William Rowan, 700 Hardy, Godfrey Harold, 97 Hasse, Helmut, 623 Hilbert, David, 171 Hoare, C. Anthony R., 374

Hopper, Grace Brewster Murray, 872 Huffman, David A., 763 Karnaugh, Maurice, 830 Kempe, Alfred Bray, 728 Kleene, Stephen Cole, 867 Knuth, Donald E., 208 Kruskal, Joseph Bernard, 800 Kuratowski, Kazimierz, 723 Lamé, Gabriel, 349 Landau, Edmund, 207 Laplace, Pierre-Simon, 447 Lukasiewicz, Jan, 782

,

McCarthy, John, 381 McCluskey, Edward J., 837 Mersenne, Marin, 261 Naur, Peter, 854 Ore, Øystein, 701 Pascal, Blaise, 419 Peirce, Charles Sanders, 38 Petersen, Julius Peter Christian, 706 Prim, Robert Clay, 798 Quine, Willard van Orman, 839 Ramanujan, Srinivasa, 98 Ramsey, Frank Plumpton, 404 Rivest, Ronald, 300 Russell, Bertrand, 110 Shamir, Adi, 300 Shannon, Claude Elwood, 812 Sheffer, Henry Maurice, 34 Sloane, Neil, 163 Smullyan, Raymond, 20 Stirling, James, 151 Tao, Terence, 263 Tukey, John Wilder, 11 Turing, Alan Mathison, 886 Vandermonde, Alexandre-Théophile, 420 Venn, John, 120 Warshall, Stephen, 604

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

I-1

Index 3x + 1 conjecture, 107 23 problems Hilbert’s list, 171, 895

Absorption laws, 27 for Boolean algebra, 815, 816 for lattices, 637 for propositions, 27 for sets, 129 Abstract definition of Boolean algebra, 817 Academic collaboration graph, 645 Academic papers, 645 Academy, Plato’s, 2 Accepted language, 868 Accepted strings, 868 Accepting state finite-state automaton, 867 Ackermann’s function, 359 Ackermann, Wilhelm, 359 Acquaintanceship graph, 645 paths in, 680 Actors, 645 Ada, Augusta (Countess of Lovelace), 29, 31 Adapting proofs, 101 Adders, 826–827 full, 826, 843 half, 826, 843 Adding an edge to a graph, 664 Addition, algorithm for, 250 finite-state machine for, 862 of functions, 141 of matrices, 178 of multisets, 138 of subsets, 793 of term in a geometric progression, 318–319 Addition (rule of inference), 71 Additive Compatibility Law, A-2 Additive inverses for integers modulo m, 243 Address system, universal, 772–773 Adjacency list, 668 Adjacency matrices, 669–671, 736 counting paths between vertices by, 688–689 Adjacent cells, 830 Adjacent vertices, 651, 654, 735 Adjective, 848 Adleman, Leonard, 299, 300 Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), 298 Adverb, 848 Affine cipher, 296, 306 decryption, 296 encryption, 296 Affine transformation, 296 Affirming the conclusion fallacy of, 75 Agrawal, Manindra, 262 Airline routes, 647 Airline system, weighted graphs modeling, 708 Airline ticket identification numbers, 293 Al-Khowarizmi, Abu Ja’far Mohammed ibn Musa, 192 Alcuin of York, 692 Aleph null, 171 Alexander the Great, 2

Algebra fundamental theorem of, 241 origin of term, 192 Algebra, Boolean abstract definition of, 817 definition of, 843 identities of, 814–816 ALGOL, 854 Algorithm(s), 191–202, 218–229, 232, div and mod, 253 addition, 250 approximation, 235, 715 binary search, 194 binary search tree, 757–769 Boolean product of zero–one matrices, 223 brute-force, 224 brute-force for closest pair of points, 225 coloring graphs, 731, 734 complexity of, 218–229 average-case, 482–484 of breadth-first search algorithms, 791 of depth-first search algorithms, 789 of Dijkstra’s algorithm, 714 of merge sort, 532 computer time used by, 228 constructing base b expansions, 248 correctness of, 193 deferred acceptance, 204, 343 definition of, 191 definiteness of, 193 describing using English, 192 Dijkstra’s, 709–714, 737 divide-and-conquer, 527, 565 division, 239, 306 division, 239 effectiveness of, 193 Euclidean, 267, 347 Euler circuits, 696–697 Euler paths, 697–698 evaluating polynomials, 230 extended Euclidean, 270, 273 fast integer multiplication, 528–529 fast matrix multiplication, 528 Fibonacci numbers, 365–367 finding maximum element, 193 finiteness of, 193 Fleury’s, 697, 706 Floyd’s, 717 Gale–Shapley, 204 generality of, 193 generating combinations, 437–438 generating permutations, 434–436 greedy, 198, 232, 324–325, 764, 798, 804 greedy change-making, 199 history of word, 192 Huffman coding, 763–764 inorder traversal, 779 input to an, 193 iterative, for Fibonacci numbers, 366 Kruskal’s, 799–801, 804 linear search, 194, 232 matrix multiplication, 222 merge sort, 367–370 minimum spanning trees, 798–802 modular exponentiation, 253 Monte Carlo, 463–465

multiplication, 251 optimal, 230 origin of term, 246 output of an, 193 parallel, 661 postorder traversal, 779 preorder traversal, 777 Prim’s, 798–799, 804 probabilistic, 445, 463–465, 494 properties of, 193 proving primality, 262 pseudocode, 192–193 reverse delete, 803 recursive, 360–370, 378 binary search, 363 correctness of, 364–367 for computing a n , 361 for computing greatest common divisor, 362 for Fibonacci numbers, 365 linear search, 363 modular exponentiation, 363 searching, 194–196, 232 binary, 528 breadth-first, 789–791, 804 depth-first, 787–789, 804 linear average-case complexity of, 483–484 linear recursive sequential, 363 sequential search, 194 serial, 661 shortest-path, 709–714 Sollin’s, 803 sorting, 196–198 topological, 627–629, 634 spanning trees, 798–802 specifying, 192 ternary search, 203 topological sorting, 628 transitive closure, 603 traversal, 773–779 Warshall’s, 603–606, 634 Algorithm for finding maximum time complexity of, 219 Algorithmic paradigm, 224, 232 backtracking, 224 brute force, 224 divide-and-conquer, 224 dynamic programming, 224, 507 greedy algorithms, 198, 224 probabilistic algorithms, 224, CH7 Alice, 302, 303, 305 Alice in Wonderland, 50 Alpha-beta pruning, 769, 809 Alphabet, 849, 899 Alphanumeric character, 391 A Mathematician’s Apology, 97 Ambiguous context-free grammar, 901 Amino acids, 389 Analytic Engine, 31 Ancestors of vertex, 747, 803 AND, 18 AND gate, 21, 823, 843 Antecedent of a conditional statement, 6 Antichain, 637

I-2

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Index I-3

Antisymmetric relation, 577–578, 633 representing using digraphs, 595 using matrices, 591–592 Appel, Kenneth, 728 Application(s) of backtracking, 791–793 of Bayes’ theorem, 471–472 of congruences, 287 of graphs colorings, 731–732 of graph theory, 644–649, 658–663, 680–681, 687, 698, 702, 731–732 of inclusion–exclusion, 558–564 of pigeonhole principle, 403–405 of propositional logic, 16–22 of satisfiability, 32–34 of trees, 757–769 Approximation algorithm, 235, 715 Arborescence, 807 Archimedean property, A-5 Archimedes, A-4 Archimedes’ screw, A-4 Argument, 69, 110 Cantor diagonalization, 173, 186 premises of, 69 propositional logic, 70 valid, 69, 110 Argument form, 70, 110 valid, 70, 110 Aristotle, 2, 3 Arithmetic fundamental theorem of, 306, 336–337 modular, 240–306 modulo m, 243 Arithmetic mean, 100, 332 Arithmeticorum Libri Duo (Maurolico), 313 Arithmetic progression, 186 of primes, 262, 263 Array linear, 662 two-dimensional, 662 Arrow, Peirce, 36 Ars Conjectandi (Bernoulli), 459 Art Gallery problem, 735 theorem, 735 Article, 848 Articulation points, 683 Artificial intelligence, 138, 380 fuzzy logic in, 16 Assertion final, 372, 378 initial, 372, 378 Assignment, stable, 343 optimal, 343 Assignment of jobs, 565 Assignments, frequency, 732 Assignment statements, A-11–A-12 Associated homogenous recurrence relations, 520 Associative laws, 27 for addition, A-1 for Boolean algebra, 815, 818 for lattices, 637 for multiplication, A-1 for propositions, 27 for sets, 129 Associativity for integers modulo m, 243 Asymmetric relation, 582 Asymptotic functions, 218 Asynchronous transfer mode (ATM), 149 AT&T network, 682 Autokey cipher keystream, 309

Autokey ciphers, 309 Automated theorem proving, 114 Automaton deterministic, 872, 873 deterministic finite-state, 899 finite-state, 866–872 nondeterministic, 873 linear bounded, 886 nondeterministic, 873 nondeterministic finite-state, 899 pushdown, 886 quotient, 878 set not recognized by, 885 Average-case complexity of algorithms, 482–484 Average-case time complexity, 220, 232 of linear search, 221 Avian influenza, 476 AVL-trees, 808 Award Turing, 854 Axiom(s), 185, A-1–A-5 Completeness, A-2 field, A-1 for real numbers, A-1–A-2 for set of positive integers, A-5 in proving basic facts, A-3–A-5 of Mathematical Induction, A-5 order, A-2 Zermelo–Fraenkel, 176 B-tree of degree k , 805 Bézout coefficients, 270, 306 Bézout’s identity, 270 Bézout’s theorem, 269, 306 Bézout, Étienne, 269 Bachmann, Paul, 206 Bachmann, Paul Gustav Heinrich, 207 Back edges, 788 Back substitution solving systems of linear congruences using, 279 Backtracking, 787–789, 804 applications of, 791–793 in directed graphs, 793 Backus, John, 854 Backus–Naur form, 899 Backus–Naur form (BNF), 854 Backward differences, 513 Backward substitution iteration using, 160 Bacon, Kevin, 680–681 Bacon number, 680 Bacteria, 168, 501 Balanced rooted trees, 753, 804 Balanced strings of parentheses, 382 Balanced ternary expansions, 256 Bandwidth of graph, 741 Bar chocolate, 342 Barber paradox, 16 Base b expansions, 246, 306 algorithm for constructing, 248 Miller’s test for, 286 pseudoprime to the, 282 strong pseudoprime to, 286 Base-10 expansions, 246 Base conversion, 247 Bases of DNA molecules, 389 BASIC, 391 Basis, vertex, 691 Basis step, 313, 333, 349, 377, 752, 767 Basketball, 434

Bayes’ theorem, 468–475 generalized, 472 Bayes, Thomas, 470, 472 Bayesian spam filters, 472–475 Begging the question, 90, 110 Bell, E. T., 618 Bellman, Richard, 508 Bell numbers, 618 Bernoulli’s inequality, 330 Bernoulli, James, 458, 459 Bernoulli family tree, 745 Bernoulli trial, 479, 494 and binomial distribution, 458–460 Bernstein, Felix, 175 Bi-implication, 9 Biconditional, 9–10, 110 implicit use of, 10 statement, 9 truth tables for, 9 Biconnected graph, 684 Bicycle racers, 475 Bidirectional bubble sort, 233 Bienaymé’s formula, 489 Bienaymé, Irenée-Jules, 489 big-O estimates for combinations of functions, 212 for exponential functions, 212 of important functions, 209 of n!, 210 for polynomials, 209,212 for products of functions, 213 for sums of functions, 212 of logarithms, 212 Big-O notation, 205–232 careless use of, 216 origin of, 206 Big-O relationship witnesses to, 205 big-Omega () notation, 214, 232 big-Theta () notation, 215, 232 Big-Theta estimates for polynomials, 216 Bigit, 11 Bijection, 144, 186 Bijective proofs, 412 Binary coded decimal expansion, 836 Binary digit, 11 Binary expansions, 246 Binary insertion sort, 196, 203 Binary relation, 573, 633 Binary representation, 306 Binary search worst-case complexity, 220 Binary search algorithm, 194, 232, 528 recursive, 363 Binary search trees, 757–759, 804 Binary trees, 352–353, 748, 749 definition of, 804 extended, 352 full, 352–353 height of, 355 number of vertices of, 355 with prefix code, 762–763 Binit, 11 Binomial coefficients, 410, 415–421, 439 extended, 539 Binomial distribution, 458–460 Binomial expression, 415 Binomial theorem, 415–418, 439 extended, 540 Binomial trees, 805 Bipartite graphs, 656–658, 736 coloring of, 657 Bird flu, 476 Birthday problem, 461–463

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH I-4

Index

Bit, 11, 110 origin of term, 11 parity check, 290 Bit operation(s), 11,110 Bits, 149 Bit string, 12, 110 subitem representing set with, 134 Bit strings counting, 388 without consecutive 0s, 505 decoding, 762–763 generating next largest, 437 in interstellar communication, 476 length of, 505 Bitwise operation, 110 Bitwise operators, 12 Block Sudoku, 32 Block cipher, 297, 306 Blocks of statements, A-14–A-15 BNF (Backus–Naur form), 854 Boat, 692 Bob, 302, 305 Bonferroni’s inequality, 467 Book number of graph, 744 Boole’s inequality, 467 Boole, George, 3, 5, 472, 811 Boolean algebra, 811–846 abstract definition of, 815 definition of, 843 identities, 27 identities of, 814–816 Boolean expressions, 812–814, 843 dual of, 816, 843 Boolean functions, 811–819, 843 dual of, 816, 843 functionally complete set of operators for, 821 implicant of, 832 minimization of, 828–840, 843 representing, 813–821 self–dual, 844 threshold, 845 Boolean power of a square zero–one matrix, 183 Boolean product, 811–812, 821, 843 of two zero–one matrices, 182 Boolean product of zero–one matrices algorithm for, 223 Boolean searches, 18 Boolean sum, 811–812, 821, 843 Boolean variable, 11, 110, 814, 820, 843 Boruvka, Otakar, 800 Bots, 794 Bottom-up parsing, 853 Bound greatest lower, 634 least upper, 634, A-2 of poset, 625 of lattice, 637 of poset, 625–626, 634 of poset, 625–626, 634 upper, A-2 Bounded lattices, 637 Bound occurrence of variable, 44 Bound variable, 44, 110 Boxes, distributing objects into, 428–431 distinguishable, 428 indistinguishable, 428 Breadth-first search, 789–791, 804 Breaking codes, 296 Bridge, in graphs, 683 Bridge problem, Königsberg, 693–694, 696, 697 Brute-force algorithm, 224 Brute-force algorithm for closest pair of points, 225 Brute-force paradigm, 232

Bubble sort, 196, 232 bidirectional, 233 worst-case complexity, 221 Bug, computer, 872 Building arguments using rules of inference, 73 Buoyancy, principle of, A-4 Busy beaver function, 896, 899 Butane, 750 Byte, 149 Cabbage, 692 Cactus, 806 CAD programs, 834 Caesar, Julius, 294 Caesar cipher, 294 decryption, 295 encryption, 294 key, 295 Cake, division of, 331 Calculus predicate, 40 propositional, 3 Call graphs, 646 connected components of, 682 Canterbury Puzzles, The (Dudeney), 504 Cantor’s theorem, 177 Cantor, Georg, 117, 118, 173, 176 Cantor diagonalization argument, 173, 186 Cantor digits, 438 Cantor expansion, 256, 438 Cardano, Girolamo, 445 Card hands, 411, 429 Cardinality, 121, 170–175, 185, 186 of a countable set (ℵ0 ), 171, 186 of union of sets, 128 Cardinality of the set of real numbers, 186 Cardinal number, 121 Carmichael, Robert Daniel, 283 Carmichael number, 283, 306 Carroll, Lewis (Charles Dodgson), 50 Carry, 250 Cartesian product, 123 Cartesian product of more than two sets, 123 Cases, proof by, 92–110 Cash box, 424–425 Catalan, Eugène Charles, 507 Catalan numbers, 507 Caterpillar, 807 Cathy, 305 Cayley, Arthur, 745, 750 Ceiling function, 149, 186 properties of, 150 Celebrity problem, 332 Cells, adjacent, 830 Center, 757 Ceres, 241 Chain, 637 Chain letter, 753 Character cipher, 297, 306 Characteristic equation, 515 Characteristic roots, 515 Chebyshev’s inequality, 491, 495 Chebyshev, Pafnuty Lvovich, 490, 491 Checkerboard tiles, 103 Check digit, 289–292 for airline ticket identification numbers, 293 ISBN, 291 ISBN-13, 308 ISSN, 293 RTN, 308 UPC, 290 Checkerboard, 103

Checkerboard, tiling of, 326, 333 Cheese, in Reve’s puzzle, 504 Chen, J. R., 264 Chess, game tree for, 769 Chessboard n-queens problem on, 792–793 knight’s tour on, 707 squares controlled by queen on, 740 Chi (Greek letter), 728 Chickens, 741 Child of vertex, 747, 803 Chinese meal, preparing, 635 Chinese postman problem, 698, 744 Chinese remainder theorem, 277, 306 Chocolate bar, 342 Chomp, 98, 342, 638 winning strategy for, 98 Chomsky, Avram Noam, 847, 851, 853 Chomsky classification of grammars, 851–852 Chromatic number, 728, 737 k -critical, 734 edge, 734 of graph, 728 Chung-Wu Ho, 340 Church, Alonzo, 897 Church–Turing thesis, 893 Cipher affine, 296, 306 autokey, 309 block, 306 Caesar, 294 character, 297, 306 monoalphabetic, 297 shift, 295, 306 transposition, 297 Vigenère, 304 Cipher block, 297 Circuits combinational, 823 depth of, 828 examples of, 823–825 minimization of, 828–840 digital, 21 Euler, 693–698, 736 Hamilton, 698–703, 736 in directed graph, 599, 633 in graph, 679 logic, 20, 110 multiple output, 826 simple, 679 Circular permutation, 415 Circular reasoning, 90, 110 Circular relation, 636 Circular table, 394 Citation graphs, 646 Civil War, 38 C language identifier, 857 Class congruence, 241 equivalence, 610–611, 633 and partitions, 612–614 definition of, 610 representative of, 610 of nondeterministic polynomial-time problems, 900 NP, 227, 896 of NP-complete problems, 897, 900 of polynomial-time problems, 227, 896, 900 Class P, 227, 896, 900 Class A addresses, 392 Class B addresses, 392 Class C addresses, 392 Class D addresses, 392 Class E addresses, 392 Clause, 74

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Index I-5

Climbing rock, 163 Clique, 739 Clock, 240 Closed formula for terms of a sequence, 159 Closed interval, 117 Closed walk, 679 Closest-pair problem, 532–535 Closure for integers modulo m, 243 Kleene, 899 closure Kleene(, 866 Closure, Kleene, 866 Closure laws for addition, A-1 for multiplication, A-1 Closures of relations, 597–606, 633 reflexive, 598, 633 symmetric, 598, 634 transitive, 597, 600–603, 634 computing, 603–606 Coast Survey, U. S., 38 COBOL, 854, 872 Cocks, Clifford, 299 Code breaking, 296 Codes, Gray, 702–703 Codes, prefix, 762–764, 804 Codeword enumeration, 506 Coding, Huffman, 763–764, 804 Codomain of a function, 139, 186 of partial function, 152 Coefficient(s) Bézout, 270, 306 binomial, 409, 415–421, 439 constant linear homogenous recurrent relations with, 515–520, 565 linear nonhomogenous recurrent relations with, 520–524, 565 extended, 539 multinomial, 434 Collaboration graphs, 645 paths in, 680 Collatz problem, 107 Collection of sets intersection of, 133 union of, 133 Collision in hashing, 288 in hashing functions, probability of, 462–463 Coloring chromatic number in, 728 of bipartite graphs, 657 of graphs, 727–732, 736 of maps, 727 Combinational circuits, 823 depth of, 828 examples of, 823–825 minimization of, 828–840 Combinations, 409–413 generating, 437–438 of events, 449–450, 455–456 with repetition, 424–427 Combinatorial identities, 417–421 Combinatorial proof, 412, 439 Combinatorics, 385, 404, 431, 439 Comments in pseudocode, A-12 Common difference, 157

Common errors with exhaustive proofs, 95 with proofs by cases, 95 Common ratio, 157 Commutative group, 244 Commutative laws, 27 for addition, A-1 for Boolean algebra, 815, 818 for lattices, 637 for multiplication, A-1 for sets, 129 Commutative ring, 244 Commutativity for integers modulo m, 243 Comparable elements in poset, 619, 633 Compatibility laws, A-2 Compatible total ordering, 628, 634 Compilers, 611, 872 Complement, 811, 843 double, law of, in Boolean algebra, 815, 818, 819 of Boolean function, 811 Complementary event, 449 Complementary graph, 667 Complementary relation, 582 Complementation law, 129 Complemented lattice, 637, 817 Complement law, 129 Complement of a fuzzy set, 138 Complement of a set, 128, 129, 186 Complete m-ary tree, 756 Complete m-partite graph, 738 Complete bipartite graph, 658, 736 Complete graphs, 655, 736 Complete induction, 334 Complexity computational, 219 constant, 225 exponential, 225 factorial, 225 linear, 225 linearithmic, 225 logarithmic, 225 of algorithm for Boolean product of zero–one matrices, 223 of matrix multiplication, 223 polynomial, 225 space, 219, 232 time, 219, 232 Complexity of algorithms, 218–229 average-case, 482–484 computational of Dijkstra’s algorithm, 714 of breadth-first search algorithms, 791 of depth-first search algorithms, 789 of merge sort, 532 Complexity of merge sort, 532 Complex numbers set of, 116 Components of graphs, connected, 682–685 strongly, 686, 736 Composite, 257 Composite integer, 306 Composite key, 585, 633 Composite of relations, 580, 633 Composition of functions, 146, 186 Composition rule, 373 Compound interest, 160 Compound proposition, 25, 109 dual of, 35 satisfiable, 30, 110 Compound propositions, 3 consistent, 110 equivalences of, in Boolean algebra, 812

equivalent, 8 logically equivalent, 25, 110 truth tables of, 10 well-formed formula for, 354 Computable function, 175 Computable function, 177, 186, 896, 900 Computable numbers, 886 Computation, models of, 847–897 Computational complexity, 219 Computational complexity of algorithms of Dijkstra’s algorithm, 714 Turing machine in making precise, 894 Computational geometry, 338–340, 532–535 Computer-aided design (CAD) programs, 834 Computer arithmetic with large integers, 279 Computer debugging, 872 Computer file systems, 750 Computer network, 641 interconnection networks, 661–663 local area networks, 661 multicasting over, 786 with diagnostic lines, 642 with multiple lines, 642 with multiple one-way lines, 642 with one-way lines, 643 Computer programming, 854 Computer representation of sets, 134 Computer science, 854 Computer time used by algorithms, 228 Computer virus invention of term, 300 transmission, 441 Concatenation, 350, 866, 899 Conclusion, 70, 110 Conclusion of a condition statement, 6 Concurrent processing, 647 Condition necessary, 6 sufficient, 6 Conditional constructions, A-12–A-13 Conditional probability, 453, 456–457, 494 Conditional statement(s), 6–9 contrapositive, 110 contrapositive of, 8 converse, 110 converse of, 8 for program correctness, 373–375 inverse of, 8 truth table for, 6 Conditions don’t care, 836–837 initial, 158, 565 Congruence, 240, 306 applications of, 287–292 linear, 275, 306 Congruence class, 241 Congruence modulo m, 609–610, 633 Congruence quadratic, 285 Congruent to, 240, 306 Conjecture, 81, 110 3x + 1, 107 Frame’s, 513 Goldbach’s, 264 twin prime, 264 Conjectures about primes, 263 Conjunction, 4, 110, 843 distributive law of disjunction over, 27 negating, 28 truth table for, 4 Conjunction (rule of inference), 71 Conjunctive normal form, 820 Connected components of graphs, 682–685 strongly, 686, 736

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH I-6

Index

Connected graphs, 678–689 directed, 685–687 planar simple, 719–723 strongly, 685 undirected, 681–685 weakly, 686 Connecting vertices, 651 Connectives logical, 4 Connectivity edge, 684 vertex, 684 Connectivity relation, 600, 633 Consequence of a condition statement, 6 Consistent compound propositions, 110 Consistent system specifications, 18 Constant coefficients linear homogenous recurrent relations with, 515–520, 565 linear nonhomogenous recurrent relations with, 520–524, 565 Constant complexity, 225 Constructing logical equivalences, 29 Construction automaton that recognizes a regular set, 881 Construction of the real numbers, A-5 Constructions conditional, A-12–A-13 loop, A-14–A-15 Constructive existence proof, 96, 110 Contains, 116 Context-free grammar(s), 851, 886 ambiguous, 901 Context-free language, 851 Context-sensitive grammars, 851 Context-sensitive languages, 886 Contingency, 25, 110 Continuum hypothesis, 175, 186 Contraction, edge, 664 Contradiction, 25, 110 proof by, 110 Contradiction, proof by, 86 Contraposition, 83 proof by, 110 Contrapositive, 8, 110 of a conditional statement, 110 Control unit Turing machine, 889 Converse, 8, 110 of a conditional statement, 110 of directed graph, 668 Conversion between bases, 247 between binary and hexadecimal, 249 between binary and octal, 249 Convex polygon, 338 Cook, Stephen, 227 Cook–Levin theorem, 227 Cookie, 426 Corollary, 110 Correctness of an algorithm, 193 of programs, 372–378 conditional statements for, 373–375 loop invariants for, 375–376 partial, 372 program verification for, 372–373 rules of inference for, 373 of recursive algorithms, 364–365 Correspondence one-to-one, 144, 186 Countability of set of rational numbers, 172

Countable set, 171, 186 cardinality of, 186 Counterexample(s), 88, 102, 110 Counting, 385–444, 501–571 basic principles of, 385–390 bit strings, 388 without consecutive 0s, 505 Boolean functions, 814 by distributing objects into boxes, 428–431 combinations, 409–413 derangements, 562, 566 functions, 387 generating functions for, 541–546 Internet addresses, 392 one-to-one functions, 387 onto functions, 560–562, 566 passwords, 391 paths between vertices, 688–689 permutations, 407–409 pigeonhole principle and, 399–405 reflexive relations, 578 relations, 578–579 subsets of finite set, 388 telephone numbers, 387 tree diagrams for, 394–395 variable names, 391 with repetition, 423 Covariance, 494 Covering relation, 623, 631 Covers, 631 CPM (Critical Path Method), 639 C programming language, 398, 611 Crawlers, 794 Cricket, 97 Criterion Euler’s, 286 Critical Path Method (CPM), 639 Crossing number, 726 Cryptanalysis, 296, 306 for shift cipher, 296 Vigenère cipher, 305 Cryptographic protocols, 302 Cryptosystem, 297–306 definition of, 297 private key, 298, 306 public key, 298 RSA, 299, 306 shift cipher, 298 Cunningham numbers, 262 Cut edge, 683, 684 set, 806 vertex, 683, 684 Cycle in directed graph, 599, 633 with n vertices, 655 Cylinder, 831 Czekanowski, Jan, 800 Database composite key of, 585 intension of, 585 primary key of, 585 records in, 584 relational model of, 584–586, 633 Database query language, 588–589 Data compression, 763 Datagrams, 399 Datalogy, 854 Datatype, 117 David Hilbert, 171 de Bruijn sequences, 744 Debugging, 872

Decidable problem, 895 Decimal expansion of a real number, 174 Decimal expansions, 246 Decision problems, 894, 900 Decision trees, 760–762, 804 Deck, standard, 402 Decreasing function, 143 Decryption, 295, 306 affine cipher, 296 Caesar cipher, 295 RSA, 300 Decryption key RSA system, 301 Dedekind, Richard, 175 Deductive reasoning, 312 Deep-Blue, 769 Deferred acceptance algorithm, 204, 343 Definiteness of an algorithm, 193 Definition recursive, 311, 344–357 Degree of n-ary relations, 584 of linear homogenous recurrence relations, 514 of region, 722 of vertex in undirected graph, 652 Degree-constrained spanning tree, 806 Degree of membership in a fuzzy set, 138 de la Vallée-Poussin, Charles-Jean-Gustave-Nicholas, 262 Delay machine, 861–862 de Méré, Chevalier, 452 De Morgan’s laws, 26, 27 for Boolean algebra, 815, 819 for propositions, 31, 28–31 for quantifiers, 47 for sets, 129 proving by mathematical induction, 323–324 De Morgan, Augustus, 26, 29, 729 Dense graph, 670 poset, 632 Denying the hypothesis, fallacy of, 75 Dependency notation, 846 Depth-first search, 787–789, 804 applications of, 794–795 in directed graphs, 794–795 Depth of combinatorial circuit, 828 Derangements, 562–565 number of, 562, 566 Derivable, 899 directly, 899 Derivable from, 849 Derivation, 849 Derivation tree, 899 Derivation trees, 852–854 Descartes René, 122 Descendants of vertex, 747, 804 Describing a set by listing its members, 116 by the roster method, 116 using set builder notation, 116 Designing finite-state automata, 869 Detachment laws of, 71 Deterministic finite-state automata, 872, 899 Deviation, standard, 487 Devil’s pair, 678 Diagnostic test results, 471–472 Diagonalization argument, Cantor, 173, 186 Diagonal of a polygon, 338 Diagonal of a square matrix, 181 Diagonal relation, 598

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Index I-7

Diagrams Hasse, 622–626, 634 state, for finite-state machine, 860 tree, 394–395, 439 Venn, 118, 185 Diameter of graph, 741 Dice, 446 Dictionary ordering, 435 Die, 468, 488–489 dodecahedral, 496 octahedral, 496 Difference, A-6 backward, 513 common, 157 forward, 568 Difference equation, 513 Difference of multisets, 138 Difference of sets, 128, 186 Diffie, Whitfield, 302 Diffie–Helman key agreement protocol, 302 Digit binary, 11 Digital circuit(s), 20–21 Digitial signatures, 303, 306 Digitial signatures in RSA system, 303 Digits Cantor, 438 Digraphs, 633, 643, 735 circuit (cycle) in, 599, 633 connectedness in, 685–687 converse of, 668 depth-first search in, 794–795 edges of, 643, 653–654 Euler circuit of, 694 loops in, 594, 633 paths in, 599–600, 633, 736 representing relations using, 594–596 self–converse, 740 vertex of, 641, 654 Dijkstra’s algorithm, 709–714, 737 Dijkstra, Edsger Wybe, 710 Dimes, 199 Diophantus, 106 Dirac’s theorem, 701 Dirac, G. A., 701 Directed edges, 644, 653–654, 735 Directed graphs, 633, 643, 735 circuit (cycle) in, 599, 633 connectedness in, 685–687 converse of, 668 depth-first search in, 794–795 edges of, 643, 653–654 Euler circuit of, 694 loops in, 594, 633 paths in, 599–600, 633, 736 representing relations using, 594–596 self–converse, 740 vertex of, 641, 654 Directed multigraph, 643, 735 paths in, 679 Directly derivable, 849, 899 Direct proof, 82, 110 Dirichlet, G. Lejeune, 262, 400 Dirichlet drawer principle, 400 Discrete logarithm, 284, 306 Discrete logarithm problem, 284 Discrete mathematics definition of, vii, viii, xviii problems studied in, xviii reasons to study, xviii Discrete probability, 445–500 assigning, 453–455 conditional, 453, 456–457, 494

finite, 445–448 Laplace’s definition of, 445 of collision in hashing functions, 462–463 of combinations of events, 449–450, 455–456 Disjoint sets, 128 Disjunction(s), 4, 109, 843 associative law of, 27 distributive law of, over conjunction, 27 negating, 28 truth table for, 4 Disjunctive normal form, 35 for Boolean variables, 820 Disjunctive syllogism, 71 Disquisitiones Arithmeticae (Gauss), 241 Distance between distinct vertices, 741 between spanning trees, 797 Distinguishable boxes, 428 objects, 428 strings, 888 Distributing objects into boxes, 428–431 Distribution binomial, 458–460 of random variable, 460, 494 geometric, 484–485, 494 probability, 453 uniform, 454, 494 Distributive lattice, 637, 817 Distributive laws, 27 for Boolean algebra, 815, 818 for propositions, 27 for sets, 129 Distributivity for integers modulo m, 243 Divide-and-conquer algorithms, 527, 565 recurrence relations, 527–535 Dividend, 238, 239 Divides, 238, 306 Divine Benevolence (Bayes), 472 Divisibility facts, proving, by mathematical induction, 321 Divisibility relation, 619 Division of integers, 238–240 trial, 258 Division algorithm, 239, 306 Division of a cake, 331 Division rule, 394 Division rule for counting, 394 Divisor, 238, 239 greatest common, 265–267, 306 DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), 388 DNA sequencing, 698 Dodecahedral die, 496 Dodgson, Charles Lutwidge (Lewis Carroll), 50 Domain of n-ary relation, 584 of a function, 139, 186 of a quantifier, 40 of partial function, 152 of relation, 584 restricted of quantifier, 44 Domain of definition of partial function, 152 Domain of discourse, 40, 110 Dominating set, 739 Domination laws, 27 for Boolean algebra, 815 for sets, 129

Domino(s), 103, 314 Don’t care conditions, 836–837 Double complement, law of, in Boolean algebra, 815, 819 Double counting proofs, 412 Double hashing, 292 Double negation law, 27 Drug testing, 475 Dual of a compound proposition, 35 of Boolean expression, 816 of Boolean function, 816 of poset, 630 Dual graph, 727 Duality in lattice, 639 Duality principle, for Boolean identities, 816 Dudeney, Henry, 504 Dynamic programming, 507 Ear(s), 343 nonoverlapping, 343 Earth, 476 EBNF (extended Backus–Naur form), 858 Eccentricity of vertex, 757 Ecology, niche overlap graph in, 648 Edge adding from a graph, 664 removing a vertices from, 664 removing from a graph, 663 Edge chromatic number, 734 Edge coloring, 734 Edge connectivity, 684 Edge contraction, 664 Edge(s) cut, 683, 684 directed, 644, 654, 735 endpoints of, 651 incident, 651, 735 multiple, 642, 643, 735 of directed graph, 643, 653–654 of directed multigraph, 643 of multigraph, 642 of pseudograph, 643 of simple graph, 642, 667 of undirected graph, 644, 654 undirected, 644, 735 Edge vertex, 594 Effectiveness of an algorithm, 193 Egyptian (unit) fraction, 380 Einstein, Albert, 24 Electronic mail, 472 Element image of, 186 pre-image of, 186 Elementary subdivision, 724, 736 Element of a set, 116, 185 Elements comparable, in partially ordered set, 619, 633 equivalent, 608 fixed, 494 greatest, of partially ordered set, 625, 634 incomparable, in partially ordered set, 619, 633 least, of partially ordered set, 625, 634 maximal, of partially ordered set, 624, 634 minimal, of partially ordered set, 624, 625, 634 Elements of Mathematical Logic (,Lukasiewicz), 782 Ellipses (. . .), 116 Empty folder, 118 Empty set, 118, 185 Empty string(s), 157, 186, 849

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH I-8

Index

Encryption, 294, 306 affine transformation, 296 public key, 306 RSA, 299 Encryption key, 306 Encrytion Caesar cipher, 294 Endpoints of edge, 651 Engine Analytic, 31 Entry of a matrix, 178 Enumeration, 392, 439 codeword, 506 Equal functions, 139 Equality of sets, 117, 185 Equal matrices, 178 Equation characteristic, 515 difference, 513 Equivalence proof of, 87 Equivalence(s) logical, 27 Equivalence classes, 610–611, 633 and partitions, 612–614 definition of, 610 representative of, 610 Equivalence relations, 607–614, 633 definition of, 608 Equivalent compound propositions, 8 logically compound propositions, 25 Equivalent Boolean expressions, 813 Equivalent elements, 608 Equivalent finite-state automata, 868, 871–872 Eratosthenes, 259, 560 sieve of, 259, 306, 565 Erd˝os, Paul, 260, 263, 635, 636, 680 Erd˝os number, 635, 680, 689 Erd˝os number Project, 680 Error single, 291 transposition, 291 Errors, in exhaustive proofs, 95 in proofs by cases, 95 in proofs by mathematical induction 328–329 Essential prime implicant, 832, 843 Euclid, 267 Euclidean algorithm, 267, 347 Euler φ -function, 272 Euler’s criterion, 286 Euler’s formula, 720–723, 737 Euler’s formula“Eureka,”, A-4 Euler, Leonhard, 693, 695 Euler circuits, 693–698, 736 Euler paths, 693–698, 736 Evaluation functions, 769 Even, 83 Event(s), 446 combinations of, 449–450, 455–456 complementary, 449 independent, 452, 457–458, 494 mutually independent, 497 Exams, scheduling, 731, 732 Exchange key, 302 Exclusion rule, 349 Exclusive or, 5, 6, 110 truth table for, 6

Exercises difficult, xix extremely challenging, xix result used in book, xix routine, xix Exhaustive proof, 93, 110 common errors with, 95 Existence proof(s), 96 constructive, 96, 110 nonconstructive, 96, 110 Existential generalization, 76 Existential instantiation, 76 Existential quantification, 42, 110 Existential quantifier, 42 Expansion(s) balanced ternary, 256 base-b, 246 binary, 246 binary coded decimal, 836 Cantor, 256 decimal, 246 hexadecimal, 246 octal, 246 Expected values, 477–480, 494 in hatcheck problem, 481 linearity of, 477–484, 494 of inversions in permutation, 482–484 Experiment, 446 Exponential complexity, 225 Exponential functions, A-7 big-O estimates for, 212 Exponential generating function, 551 Exponentiation modular, 253 recursive, 363 Expression(s) binomial, 415 Boolean, 812–814, 843 infix form of, 780 postfix form of, 781 prefix form of, 780 regular, 879, 899 Expressions logically equivalent, 110 extended Backus–Naur form, 858 Extended binary trees, 352 Extended binomial coefficients, 539 Extended binomial theorem, 540 Extended Euclidean algorithm, 270, 273 Extended transition function, 867 Extension of transition function, 867 Exterior of simple polygon, 338 Facebook, 645 Factor, 238 Factorial complexity, 225 Factorial function, 151 Factorials, recursive procedure for, 361 Factoring, 262 Factorization prime, 259 Failure, 458 Fairy, tooth, 112 Fallacies, 69, 75, 110 of affirming the conclusion, 75 of denying the hypothesis, 75 False negative, 471, 472 positive, 471, 472 Family trees, 745 Farmer, 692

Fast multiplication of integers, 528–529 of matrices, 529 Female pessimal, 234 Fermat’s last theorem, 106, 349 Fermat’s little theorem, 281, 306 proof of, 285 Fermat, Pierre de, 106, 281, 282 Fibonacci, 348 Fibonacci numbers, 347 and Huffman coding, 771 formula for, 517 iterative algorithm for, 366 rabbits and, 502–503 recursive algorithms for, 365 Fibonacci sequence, 158 Fibonacci trees, rooted, 757 Field axioms, A-1 Fields, 584 Fields Medal, 263 Filter, spam, 472–475 Final assertion, 372, 378 Final exams, scheduling, 731, 732 Final state finite-state automaton, 867 of a Turing machine, 891 Turing machine, 891 Final value, A-14 Finding maximum element in a sequence algorithm for, 192 Finite-state automata, 866–872 accepting state, 867 designing, 869 deterministic, 872, 899 equivalent, 868 final state, 867 initial state, 867 minimization, 872 nondeterministic, 873, 899 set not recognized by, 885 Finite-state machine, 847, 858, 885, 899 for addition, 862 input string, 861 output string, 861 transition function extension, 867 transition function extension in, 867 with output, 859, 865 with outputs, 859, 863 Finite-state transducer, 859 Finite graph, 641 Finiteness of an algorithm, 193 Finite probability, 445–448 Finite set, 121, 185 Finite sets, 553, 565 number of subsets, 323 subsets of counting, 388 number of, 323 union of three, number of elements in, 554–556, 566 union of two, number of elements in, 553, 565 First difference, 513 First forward difference, 568 Fixed elements, 494 Fixture controlled by three switches, circuit for, 825 Flavius Josephus, 512 Fleury’s algorithm, 697, 706 Flip-flops, 846 Floor function, 149, 186 properties of, 150 Floyd’s algorithm, 717

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Index I-9

Folder empty, 118 Forbidden pairs, 234 Forests, 746 definition of, 803 minimum spanning, 802 spanning, 796 Form argument, 70 Backus–Naur, 854, 899 conjunctive normal, 820 disjunctive normal for Boolean variables, 820 extended Backus–Naur form, 858 infix, 780 postfix, 781 prefix, 780 Form, argument, 110 Formal language, 848 Formal power series, 538 Formula(s) Euler’s, 720–723, 737 for compound propositions, 354 for Fibonacci numbers, 517 of operators and operands, 351 Stirling’s, 151 summation, 315 well-formed, 350 FORTRAN, 854 Fortune cookie, 441 Forward differences, 568 Forward reasoning, 100 Forward substitution iteration using, 160 Four color theorem, 728–731, 737 Fraction, unit (Egyptian), 380 Frame’s conjecture, 513 Free variable, 44, 110 Frend, Sophia, 29 Frequency assignments, 732 Friendship graph, 645 Frisbee, rocket-powered, 812 Full m-ary tree, 748, 752, 804 complete, 756 Full adder, 826, 843 Full binary trees, 352–353 height of, 355 number of vertices of, 355 Full subtractor, 828 Function(s), 139, 186 Addition of, 141 Ackermann’s, 359 asymptotic, 218 as relations, 574 big-O estimates of, 209 bijective, 144 Boolean, 811–819, 843 dual of, 816 functionally complete set of operators for, 821 implicant of, 832 minimization of, 828–840, 843 representing, 813–821 self–dual, 844 threshold, 845 busy beaver, 896,899 ceiling, 149, 186 codomain of, 139 codomain of a, 186 composition of, 146, 186 computable, 175, 177, 186, 896, 900 counting, 387 decreasing, 143 domain of, 186

equal, 139 Euler φ , 272 evaluation, 769 exponential, A-7 factorial, 151 floor, 149, 186 generating, 537–548, 565 exponential, 551 for counting, 541–546 for proving identities, 548 for recurrence relations, 546–548 probability, 552 graph of, 148 greatest integer, 149 growth of, 209 growth of combinations of, 212–214 hashing, 287 collision in, probability of, 462–463 identity, 144 increasing, 143 injective, 141 counting, 387 integer-valued, 140 inverse, 145 inverse of, 186 invertible, 145 iterated, 360 iterated logarithm, 360 logarithmic, A-7–A-9 McCarthy, 380 multiplication of functions, 141 number-theoretic, 892 mod, 239, 306 one-to-one, 141, 186 onto, 186 number of, 560–562, 566 partial, 152, 186, 889 probing, 288 propositional, 110 range of, 186 real-valued, 140 recursive, 345–349, 378 strictly decreasing, 143 strictly increasing, 143 surjective, 143 threshold, 845 total, 152 transition, 859 Turing machines computing, 892–893 uncomputable, 175, 186, 896, 900 Functional completeness, 821 Functional decomposition, 846 Functionally complete logical operators, 35 Functionally complete set of operators for Boolean functions, 821, 843 Fundamental theorem of algebra, 241 Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, 258, 306 proof of, 271 Fuzzy logic, 16 Fuzzy set(s), 138 complement of, 138 degree of membership, 138 intersection of, 138 union of, 138 Gödel, Escher, Bach (Hofstader), 382 Gale–Shapley algorithm, 204 Gambling, 445 Game obligato, 112 Game trees, 764–769, 804 Gates, logic, 21, 110, 822–827 AND, 21, 823, 843 combination of, 823

NAND, 828 NOR, 828 OR, 21, 823, 843 threshold, 845 Gating networks, 822–823 depth of, 828 examples of, 823–825 minimization of, 828–840 Gauss, Karl Friedrich, 241 Gecko, Gordon, 198 Gene, 389 Generality of an algorithm, 193 Generalization existential, 76 universal, 76 Generalized combinations, 423–427 Generalized induction, 356–357 Generalized permutations, 423 Generalized pigeonhole principle, 401–403, 439 Generating functions, 537–548, 565 exponential, 551 for counting, 541–546 for proving identities, 548 for recurrence relations, 546–548 probability, 552 Generator, power, 292 Gene sequencing, 389 Genome, 389 Geometric distribution, 484–485, 494 Geometric mean, 100, 332 Geometric progression, 157, 186 sum of terms of, 164 Geometric progression(s) sums of, 318–319 Geometric series, 164 Geometry, computational, 338–340, 532–535 Giant strongly connected components (GSCC), 686 GIMPS (Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search, 261 Givens in Sudoku, 32 Goat, 692 Goldbach’s conjecture, 264 Goldbach, Christian, 264 Golomb’s self-generating sequence, 382 Golomb, Solomon, 105 Google, 18, 794 Gossip problem, by mathematical induction, 332 Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), U.K, 299 Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), U.K., 299 Graceful trees, 807 Graham, Ron, 636 Grammar(s), 848 Backus–Naur form of, 854 context-free, 886 context-free (type 2), 851 context-sensitive, 851 language generated by, 850 language of, 850 monotonic, 852 noncontracting, 852 productions, 849 phrase-structure, 849–854, 899 regular, 884, 899 regular (type 3), 851 type 0, 851, 899 type 1, 851, 899 type 2, 851, 899 type 3, 851, 883, 899 Grand Hotel, Hilbert’s, 171

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH I-10

Index

Graph(s), 641–744 k -connected, 684 n-regular, 667 academic collaboration, 645 acquaintanceship, 645 airline route, 647 bandwidth of, 741 biconnected, 684 bipartite, 656–658, 736 book number of, 744 call, 646 connected components of, 682 chromatically k -critical, 734 chromatic number of, 728 citation, 646 collaboration, 645 coloring, 727–732, 736 complementary, 667 complete, 655, 736 complete m-partite, 738 complete bipartite, 658, 736 connected components of, 682–685, 736 connectedness in, 678–689 cut set of, 806 definition of, 643 diameter of, 741 directed, 633, 643, 735 circuit (cycle) in, 599, 633 connectedness in, 685–687 converse of, 668 dense, 670 depth-first search in, 794–795 edges of, 643, 653–654 Euler circuit of, 694 loops in, 594, 633 paths in, 599–600, 633, 736 representing relations using, 594–596 self–converse, 740 simple, 643 vertex of, 641, 654 directed multigraph, 644, 735 dual, 727 finite, 641 friendship, 645 Hollywood, 645 homeomorphic, 724–725, 736 independence number of, 741 infinite, 641 influence, 645 in roadmap modeling, 647 intersection, 650 isomorphic, 668, 671–675, 736 paths and, 687–688 matching in, 659 mixed, 644 models, 644–649 module dependency, 647 monotone decreasing property of, 742 monotone increasing property of, 742 multigraphs, 642, 644, 735 niche overlap, 648 nonplanar, 724–725 nonseparable, 683 orientable, 740 paths in, 678–681 planar, 718–725, 736 precedence, 647 protein interaction, 648 pseudograph, 643, 644, 735 radius of, 741 regular, 667, 736 representing, 668–675 self-complementary, 677

simple, 642, 654–655, 735 coloring of, 727 connected planar, 719–723 crossing number of, 726 dense, 670 edges of, 642, 663 isomorphic, 671–675, 736 orientation of, 740 paths in, 785 random, 742 self-complementary, 677 sparse, 670 thickness of, 726 vertices of, 642, 663 with spanning trees, 785–787 simple directed, 643 sparse, 670, 802 strongly directed connected, 685 subgraph of, 663, 736 terminology of, 651–654 undirected, 644, 653, 736 connectedness in, 681–685 Euler circuit of, 694 Euler path of, 698 orientation of, 740 paths in, 679, 736 underlying, 654, 736 union of, 664, 736 very large scale integration, 744 Web, 646–647 strongly connected components of, 686 weighted, 736 shortest path between, 707–714 traveling salesman problem with, 714–716 wheel, 655, 736 Graph of a function, 148 Gray, Frank, 703 Gray codes, 702–703 “Greater than or equal” relation, 618–619 Greatest common divisor, 265–267, 306 as linear combination, 269 Greatest element of poset, 625, 634 Greatest integer function, 149 Greatest lower bound, 634 of poset, 625 Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search (GIMPS), 261 Greedy algorithm(s), 198, 232, 235, 325, 764, 798, 804 definition of, 198 for making change, 199 for minimizing maximum lateness of a job, 235 for scheduling talks, 200 Green, Ben, 263 Green–Tao theorem, 263 Group commutative, 244 Growth of functions, 209 GSCC (giant strongly connected components), 686 Guarding set, 735 Guare, John, 680 Guidelines for mathematical induction, 328 Guthrie, Francis, 729 Hadamard, Jacques, 262 Haken, Wolfgang, 728 Half adder, 826, 843 Half subtractor, 828 Hall’s marriage theorem, 659 Hall, Philip, 659, 660 Halting problem, 201, 895, 900 Hamilton’s “Voyage Around the World” Puzzle, 700 Hamilton, Sir William Rowan, 698, 700 Hamilton, William Rowan, 729 Hamilton circuits, 698–703, 736

Hamilton paths, 698–703, 736 Handle, 806 Handshaking theorem, 653 Hanoi, tower of, 503–504 Hardware systems, 17 Hardy, Godfrey Harold, 97 Hardy, Godrey Harold, 97 Hardy–Weinberg law, 97 Harmonic mean, 108 Harmonic number(s) inequality of, 320–321 Harmonic series, 321 Hashing collision in, 288 double, 292 function, 287 key, 287 Hashing functions collision in, probability of, 462–463 Hasse’s algorithm, 107 Hasse, Helmut, 623 Hasse diagrams, 622–626, 634 Hatcheck problem, 481, 562 Hazard-free switching circuits, 846 Heaps, 809 Heawood, Percy, 728 Height, star, 901 Height-balanced trees, 808 Height of full binary tree, 355 Height of rooted tree, 753, 804 Hellman, Martin, 302 Hexadecimal expansions, 246 Hexadecimal representation, 306 Hexagon identity, 421 Hilbert’s 23 problems, 171, 895 Hilbert’s Grand Hotel, 171 Hilbert’s Tenth Problem, 895 Hilbert, David, 171, 176, 895 HIV, 476 Ho, Chung-Wu, 340 Hoare, C. Anthony R., 372, 374 Hoare triple, 372 Hofstader, Douglas, 382 Hollywood graph, 645 paths in, 680–681 Homeomorphic graphs, 724–725, 736 Hopper, Grace Brewster Murray, 872 Hops, 662 Horner’s method, 230 Horse races, 31 Host number (hostid), 392 HTML, 858 Huffman, David A., 763 Huffman coding, 763–764, 804 variations of, 764 Human genome, 389 Husbands, jealous, 693 Hybrid topology for local area network, 661 Hydrocarbons, trees modeling, 750 Hypercube, 662 Hypothesis continuum, 175, 186 inductive, 313 Hypothesis of a conditional statement, 6 Hypothetical syllogism, 71 “Icosian Game,”, 700 Icosian Puzzle, 698 Idempotent laws for Boolean algebra, 815, 819 for lattices, 637 for propositions, 27 for sets, 129

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Index I-11

Identification number single error in, 291 Identification number(s) for airline tickets, 293 Identification numbers for money orders, 293 Identifier, 611 ALGOL, 855 C language, 857 Identifying a sequence from its initial terms, 161 Identities Boolean algebra, 27 set, 129 set(, 129 set), 132 Identities, combinatorial, 417–421 Identities for Boolean algebra, 129 Identity Bézout’s, 270 combinatorial, proof of, 412, 439 hexagon, 421 proving, generating functions for, 548 Vandermonde’s, 420–421 Identity element(s) for integers modulo m, 243 Identity elements axiom, A-1 identity function, 144 Identity laws, 27 additive, A-1 for Boolean algebra, 815, 816, 818 for sets, 129 multiplicative, A-1 Identity matrix, 180, 186 If–then construction, 8 If then statement, 6 If and only if, 9 Iff, 9 Image of an element, 139, 186 Image of a set, 141 Implicant, 832 essential, 832 prime, 832 Implication, 6, 110 Implicit use of biconditionals, 10 In-degree of vertex, 654, 736 Incidence matrices, 671, 736 Incident edge, 651 Inclusion–exclusion principle, 128, 392–394, 553–557, 566 alternative form of, 558–559 applications with, 558–564 Inclusion relation, 619 Inclusive or, 5 Incomparable elements in poset, 619, 633 Incomplete induction, 334 Incorrect proof by mathematical induction, 757 Increasing function, 143 Increment for linear congruential method, 288 Independence number, 741 Independent events, 452, 453, 457–458, 494 Independent random variables, 485–487, 494 Independent set of vertices, 741 Index of summation, 163 Index registers, 732 Indicator random variable, 492 Indirect proofs, 83 Indistinguishable boxes, 428–431 objects, 428–431 objects, permutations with, 428 strings, 888

Induction complete, 334 generalized, 356–357 incomplete, 334 mathematical, 29, 311–329 principle of, 377 proofs by, 315–329 second principle of, 334 strong, 333–335, 378 structural, 353–356, 378 validity of, 326 well-ordered, 620, 634 Inductive definitions, 345–357 of functions, 345–349, 378 of sets, 349–356, 378 of strings, 350 of structures, 349–356 Inductive hypothesis, 313 Inductive loading, 333, 343, 380 Inductive reasoning, 312 Inductive step, 313, 377, 752, 768 Inequality Bernoulli’s, 330 Bonferroni’s, 467 Boole’s, 467 Chebyshev’s, 491, 495 Markov’s, 493 of harmonic numbers, 320–321 proving by mathematical induction, 319–320 triangle, 108 Inference for program correctness, 373 rule of, 110 rules of, 69–71 Infinite graph, 641 Infinite ladder, 311 by strong induction, 334 Infinite series, 167 Infinite set, 121 Infinitude of primes, 260 Infix form, 780 Infix notation, 779–782, 804 Influence graphs, 645 Information flow, lattice model of, 627 Initial assertion, 372, 378 Initial conditions, 158, 565 Initial position of a Turing machine, 889 Initial state, 859 finite-state automaton, 867 of a Turing machine, 889 Initial terms identifying a sequence using, 161 Initial value, A-14 Initial vertex, 594, 654 Injection, 141, 186 Injective (one-to-one) function counting, 387 Injective function, 141 Inorder traversal, 773, 775, 778, 804 Input to an algorithm, 193 Input alphabet, 859 Input string finite-state machine, 861 Insertion sort, 196, 197, 232 average-case complexity of, 483–484 worst-case complexity, 222 Instantiation existential, 76 universal, 75 Integer composite, 257, 306

perfect, 272 prime, 257 signed, 855 Integer(s) linear combination of, 306 Integer-valued function, 140 Integers axioms for, A-5 division of, 238–240 multiplication of fast, 528–529 pairwise relatively prime, 306 partition of, 359 relatively prime, 306 set of, 116 squarefree, 564 Integer sequences, 162 Integers modulo m, 243 additive inverses, 243 associativity, 243 closure, 243 commutativity, 243 distributivity, 243 identity elements, 243 Intension, of database, 585 Interconnection networks for parallel computation, 661–663 Interest, compound, 160 Interior of simple polygon, 338 Interior vertices, 603 Internal vertices, 748, 804 International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO), 263, 299 International Standard Book Number (ISBN), 291 International Standard Serial Number (ISSN), 293 Internet, search engines on, 794 Internet addresses, counting, 392 Internet datagram, 399 Internet Movie Database, 645 Internet Protocol (IP) multicasting, 786 Intersection of fuzzy sets, 138 Intersection graph, 650 Intersection of a collection of sets, 133 Intersection of multisets, 138 Intersection of sets, 127, 185 Interval(s), 117 closed, 117 open, 117, 332 Intractable problems, 226 Intractable problem, 232, 897 Invariant for graph isomorphism, 672, 736 Invariants, loop, 375–376, 378 Inverse, 8 modular, 275, 306 Inverse, multiplicative, 60 Inverse function, 145, 186 Inverse law for addition, A-2 for multiplication, A-2 Inverse of a square matrix, 184 Inverse relation, 582 Inversions, in permutation, expected number of, 482–484 Inverter, 21, 823, 843 invertible function, 145 Invertible matrix, 184 IP multicasting,√786 Irrationality of 2, 342, 381 Irrational number(s), 85, 116 Irreflexive relation, 581 ISBN-10, 291 ISBN-13, 291 check digit, 308

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH I-12

Index

ISBN check digit, 291 Isobutane, 750 Isolated vertex, 652, 736 Isomorphic graphs, 668, 671–675, 736 paths and, 687–688 Iterated function, 360 Iterated logarithm, 360 Iteration, 160, 360 using to solve recurrence relations, 159 Iteration using backward substitution, 160 Iteration using forward substitution, 160 Iterative algorithm, for Fibonacci numbers, 366 Iterative procedure, for factorials, 366 Iwaniec, Henryk, 264 Jacobean rebellion, 151 Jacquard loom, 31 Jarník, Vojtˇech, 798 Java, 855 Jealous husband problem, 693 Jersey crags, 163 Jewish–Roman wars, 512 Jigsaw puzzle, 342 Job(s) assignment of, 565, 658 lateness of, 235 slackness of, 235 Join, in lattice, 637 Join of n-ary relations, 588 Join of zero–one matrices, 181 Joint authorship, 645 Jordan curve theorem, 338 Josephus, Flavius, 512 Josephus problem, 512 Jug, 109, 693 k -connected graph, 684 k -tuple graph coloring, 734 K-maps, 830–836, 843 Königsberg, 171 Königsberg bridge problem, 693–694, 696, 697 Kakutani’s problem, 107 Kaliningrad, Russia, 693 Karnaugh, 830–836 Karnaugh, Maurice, 830 Karnaugh maps, 830–836, 843 Kayal, Neeraj, 262 Kempe, Alfred Bray, 728 Key, 295 composite, 585 encryption, 306 for Caesar cipher, 295 hashing function, 287 primary, 585–586 public, 299 Key exchange, 302 Key exchange protocol, 305, 306 Keystream autokey cipher, 309 King Hermeas, 2 Kissing problem, 163 Kleene’s theorem, 880, 900 Kleene, Stephen Cole, 867, 878 Kleene closure, 866, 899 Knapsack problem, 235, 568 Kneiphof Island, 693 Knight’s tour, 707 reentrant, 707 Knights, knaves, and normals puzzles, 112 Knights, knaves, and spies puzzles, 112 Knights and knaves puzzles, 19 Knuth, Donald, 196, 206 Knuth, Donald E., 208

Kruskal’s algorithm, 799–801, 804 Kruskal, Joseph Bernard, 799, 800 Kuratowski’s theorem, 724–725, 737 Kuratowski, Kazimierz, 724 Löb’s paradox, 112 Labeled tree, 756 Ladder, infinite, 311–334 Lady Byron, Annabella Millbanke, 31 Lagarias, Jeffrey, 107 Lamé’s theorem, 347 Lamé, Gabriel, 349 Landau, Edmund, 206, 207 Landau symbol, 206 Language, 847–899 context-free, 851 context-sensitive, 886 formal, 848 generated by grammar, 850 natural, 847–848 of a grammar, 850 recognized by nondeterministic finite-state automaton, 873 recognized by an automaton, 899 recognized by finite-state automata, 868 regular, 851 Language recognizer, 863 Laplace’s definition of probability, 446 Laplace, Pierre Simon, 445, 447, 472 Large integers computer arithmetic with, 279 Large numbers, law of, 459 Lateness of a job, 235 Lattice model of information flow, 627 Lattice point, 380 Lattices, 626–627, 634 absorption laws for, 637 associative laws for, 637 bounded, 637 commutative laws for, 637 complemented, 637 distributive, 637 duality in, 639 idempotent laws for, 637 join in, 637 meet in, 637 modular, 639 Law complement, 129 complementation, 129 Hardy–Weinberg, 97 Law(s) absorption for Boolean algebra, 815, 816 for lattices, 637 for propositions, 27 associative for addition, A-1 for Boolean algebra, 815, 818 for lattices, 637 for multiplication, A-1 for propositions, 27 closure for addition, A-1 for multiplication, A-1 commutative for addition, A-1 for Boolean algebra, 815, 818 for lattices, 637 for multiplication, A-1

compatibility additive, A-2 multiplicative, A-2 completeness, A-2 De Morgan’s for Boolean algebra, 815, 819 for propositions, 28 proving by mathematical induction, 323–324 distributive, A-2 for Boolean algebra, 815, 818 for propositions, 27 domination for Boolean algebra, 815 idempotent for Boolean algebra, 815, 819 for lattices, 637 for propositions, 27 identity additive, A-1 for Boolean algebra, 815, 816, 818 multiplicative, A-1 inverse for addition, A-2 for multiplication, A-2 of detachment, 71 of double complement, in Boolean algebra, 815, 818 of large numbers, 459 of mathematical induction, A-5 transitivity, A-2 trichotomy, A-2 used to prove basic facts, A-3–A-5 Law of total expectation, 492 Laws De Morgan’s, 26 Laws of propositional logic, 27 absorption, 27 associative, 27 commutative, 27 De Morgan’s, 27 distributive, 27 domination, 27 double negation, 27 identity, 27 Laws of Thought, The (Boole), 472, 811 Leaf, 746, 804 Least common multiple, 266, 306 Least element of poset, 625, 634 Least upper bound, 634, A-2 of poset, 625 Left child of vertex, 749 Left subtree, 749 Lemma, 81, 110 pumping, 888 Length of bit string, 505 Length of path in directed graph, 599 in weighted graph, 708 Length of string recursive definition of, 350 “Less than or equals” relation, 619 Letters of English relative frequency, 296 Level of vertex, 753, 804 Level order of vertex, 806 Levin, Leonid, 227 Lewis Carroll (C. L. Dodgson), 50 Lexicographic ordering, 356, 435, 620–622 Liber Abaci (Fibonacci), 348 Library sort, 196 Light fixture controlled by three switches, circuit for, 825 Limit, definition of, 61

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Index I-13

Linear array, 662 Linear bounded automata, 886 Linear combination of integers, 269, 306 Linear complexity, 225 Linear congruence, 275, 306 systems of, 277–279 Linear congruence(s) solving, 277 Linear congruential method, 288 increment, 288 modulus, 288 multiplier, 288 seed, 288 Linear homogenous recurrence relations, 514–520, 565 Linearithmic complexity, 225 Linearity of expectations, 477–484, 494 Linearly ordered set, 619, 633 Linear nonhomogenous recurrence relations, 520–524, 565 Linear ordering, 619, 633 Linear probing function, 288 Linear search average-case time complexity, 221 Linear search algorithm, 194, 232 average-case complexity of, 482–484 recursive, 363 time complexity of, 220 LISP, 855 List of 23 problems David Hilbert, 176 Lists, merging two, 368 Literal, 820, 843 Little-o notation, 218 Littlewood, John E., 97 Load balancing problem, 235 Loading, inductive, 333, 343, 380 Load of a processor, 235 Loan, 169 Lobsters, 524 Local area networks, 661 Logarithm discrete, 284 Logarithm, iterated, 360 Logarithm discrete, 306 Logarithmic complexity, 225 Logarithmic function, A-7–A-9 logarithms big-O estimates of, 212 Logic, 1 fuzzy, 16 predicate, 37 propositional, 3 Logical connectives, 4 Logical equivalences, 27 constructing, 29 Logical Expression(s) translating English sentences into, 62–63 Logical expressions translating English sentences into, 16–17 translating mathematical statements into, 60, 61 Logically equivalent compound propositions, 25, 110 Logically equivalent expressions, 110 Logically equivalent statements, 45 Logical operators, 109 functionally complete, 35 precedence of, 11 Logic circuit, 20, 110 Logic gates, 21, 110, 822–827 AND, 21, 823, 843 combination of, 823 NAND, 828 NOR, 828

OR, 21,823, 843 threshold, 845 Logic programming, 51 Logic puzzles, 19–20 Long-distance telephone network, 646 Longest common subsequence problem, 568 Loom, Jacquard, 31 Loop constructions, A-14–A-15 Loop invariants, 375–376, 378 Loops in directed graphs, 594, 633 nested, 58 within loops, A-15 Lord Byron, 31 Lottery, 447 Mega Millions, 496 Powerball, 496 Lovelace, Countess of (Augusta Ada), 29, 31 Lower bound of lattice, 637 of poset, 625, 634 Lower limit of a summation, 163 Lucas, Edouard, 503 Lucas, François Édouard, 162 Lucas numbers, 379, 525 Lucas sequence, 162 Lucky numbers, 570 , Lukasiewicz, Jan, 780, 782 m-ary tree, 748, 804 complete, 756 full, 748, 752 height of, 754–755 m-tuple, 586 Ménages, probl‘eme des, 571 Machine finite-state, 899 Mealy, 863, 899 Moore, 863, 865 Turing, 899 machine unit-delay, 861 Machine(s) delay, 861–862 finite-state, 847, 858–859 with no output, 865 with outputs, 859–863 Turing, 847, 886, 888, 889, 893 computing functions with, 892–893 definition of, 889 nondeterministic, 893 sets recognized by, 891–892 types of, 893 Machine minimization, 872 vending, 858–859 MAD Magazine, 208 Magic tricks, 20 Majority voting, circuit for, 825 Makespan, 235 Making change greedy algorithm, 199 Male optimal, 234 Mappings, 139 Maps coloring of, 727 Markov’s inequality, 493 markup languages, 858 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), 299 Master theorem, 532 Matching, 659 maximum, 659 stable, 204 string, 231

Matchings with forbidden pairs, 234 Mathematical induction, 29, 311–329 Axiom of, A-5 errors in, 328–329 generalized, 356–357 guidelines for, 328 incorrect proof by, 757 inductive loading with, 333 principle of, 377 proofs by, 315–329 errors in, 328–329 of divisibility facts, 321 of inequalities, 319–320 of results about algorithms, 324 of results about sets, 323–324 of summation formulae, 315 second principle of, 334 strong, 333–335, 378 structural, 353–356, 378 template for, 328 template for proofs, 329 validity of, 328 Matrix (matrices) addition, 178 adjacency, 669–671, 736 counting paths between vertices by, 688–689 entry of, 178 equal, 178 identity, 180, 186 incidence, 671, 736 invertible, multiplication algorithm for, 222 complexity of, 223 noncommutativity of, 179 fast, 529 representing relations using, 591–594 row of a, 178 sparse, 670 square, 178 symmetric, 181, 186 transpose of, 181, 186 upper triangular, 231 zero–one, 181, 186 of transitive closure, 602–603 representing relations using, 591–594 Warshall’s algorithm and, 604–606 Matrix-chain multiplication, 223 Matrix-chain multiplication problem, 513 Matrix product, 179 Maurolico, Francesco, 313 Maximal element of poset, 624, 634 Maximum, of sequence, 528 Maximum element algorithm for finding, 193 in finite sequence, 192 Maximum matching, 659 Maximum satisfiability problems, 498 Maximum spanning tree, 802 Maxterm, 822 McCarthy function, 380 McCarthy, John, 381 McCluskey, Edward J., 837 Mealy, G. H., 863 Mealy machine, 863, 899 Mean, 203 arithmetic, 100, 332 deviation from, 491 geometric, 100, 332 harmonic, 108 quadratic, 108 Median, 203 Meet, in lattice, 637 Meet of zero–one matrices, 181

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH I-14

Index

Mega Millions, Lottery, 496 Meigu, Guan, 698 Member of a set, 185 Membership table, 186 Members of a set, 116 memoization, 510 Merge sort, 196, 367–370, 378, 528 complexity of, 532 recursive, 368 Merging two lists, 368 Mersenne, Marin, 261 Mersenne primes, 261, 306 Mesh network, 662–663 Mesh of trees, 809 metacharacters, 858 Metafont, 208 Method middle-square, 292 roster, 116 Method(s) Critical Path, 639 Horner’s, 230 probabilistic, 465–466, 494 Quine–McCluskey, 830, 837–840 Method(s) of proof, 82 by cases, 92, 95 by contradiction, 86 by contraposition, 83 by exhaustion, 93 direct, 82 exhaustive, 93 proofs of equivalence, 87 trivial, 84 vacuous, 84 Method roster, 185 Middle-square method, 292 Millennium Prize problems, 227 Miller’s test, 286 Miller’s test for base b, 286 Minimal element of poset, 624, 634 Minimization of Boolean functions, 828–840, 843 of combinational circuits, 828–840 Minimization of a finite-state machine, 872 Minimizing maximum lateness greedy algorithm for, 235 Minimum, of sequence, 528 Minimum dominating set, 739 Minimum spanning forest, 802 Minimum spanning trees, 797–802, 804 Minmax strategy, 767, 804 Minterm, 820, 843 Mistakes in proofs, 89–90 Mixed graph, 644 mod function, 239, 306 Mode, 203 Modeling computation, 847–897 with graphs, 644–649 with recurrence relations, 502–507 with trees, 749–752 Modular arithmetic, 240–306 Modular exponentiation, 253 algorithm for, 253 recursive, 363 Modular inverse, 275, 306 Modular lattice, 639 Modular properties, in Boolean algebra, 819 Module dependency graphs, 647 Modulus for linear congruential method, 288 Modus ponens, 71 universal, 77

Modus tollens, 71 universal, 77 Mohammed’s scimitars, 697 Molecules, trees modeling, 750 Money orders identification numbers for, 293 Monoalphabetic cipher, 297 Monotone decreasing property of graph, 742 Monotone increasing property of graph, 742 Monotonic grammars, 852 Monte Carlo algorithms, 463–465 Montmort, Pierre Raymond de, 563, 571 Monty Hall Three Door Puzzle, 450, 452, 476, 499 Monty Python, 472 Moore, E. F., 863 Moore machine, 863, 865 Moth, 872 Motorized pogo stick, 812 Mr. Fix-It, 263 Muddy children puzzle, 19 Multicasting, 786 Multigraphs, 642, 644, 735 Euler circuit of, 697 Euler path of, 697 undirected, 644 Multinomial coefficient, 434 Multinomial theorem, 434 Multiple, 238 least common, 266, 306 Multiple edges, 642–644, 735 Multiple output circuit, 826 Multiplexer, 828 Multiplication of function, 141 matrix-chain, 223 of integers fast, 528–529 of matrices fast, 529 Multiplication algorithm, 251 Multiplicative Compatibility Law, A-2 Multiplicative inverse, 60 Multiplicities of elements in a multiset, 138 Multiplier for linear congruential method, 288 Multiset, 138 multiplicities of elements, 138 Multisets difference of, 138 intersection of, 138 Mutually independent events, 497 Mutually independent trials, 458 n-ary relations, 583–589, 633 domain of, 584 operations on, 586–588 n-cubes, 655 n-queens problem, 792–793 n-regular graph, 667 n-tuple ordered, 122 n-tuples, 584–585 Naive set theory, 118 Namagiri, 98 NAND, 821, 843 NAND gate, 828 Natural language, 847–848 Natural numbers set of, 116 Naur, Peter, 854

NAUTY, 674 Naval Ordnance Laboratory, 872 Navy WAVES, 872 Necessary and sufficient conditions, 9 Necessary condition, 6 expressing a conditional statement using, 6 Necessary for, 6 Negating conjunctions, 28 Negating disjunctions, 28 Negating Quantified Expressions, 46 Negation, 109 of a proposition, 3 of nested quantifiers, 63–64 truth table for, 4 Negation operator, 4 Negative false, 471 true, 471 Neighbors in graphs, 651 Neptune, 476 Nested loops, 58 Nested quantifiers, 57–64 negating, 63–64 Network(s) computer, 641 interconnection networks, 661–663 local area networks, 661 multicasting over, 786 with diagnostic lines, 642 with multiple lines, 642 with multiple one-way lines, 642 with one-way lines, 643 gating, 822–823 depth of, 828 examples of, 823–825 minimization of, 828–840 social, 644 tree-connected, 751–752 Network number (netid), 392 Newton–Pepys problem, 500 Niche overlap graph, 648 Nickels, 199 Nim, 766, 768 Nobel Prize, 119 Nodes, 594, 641 Noncommutativity of matrix multiplication, 179 Nonconformists, 472 Nonconstructive existence proof, 96, 110 Noncontracting grammar, 851 Nondeterministic finite-state automaton, 873, 899 equivalent finite-state automaton, 874 language recognized by, 873 Nondeterministic polynomial-time problems, 227 class of, 900 item Nondeterministic Turing machine, 893, 899 Nonoverlapping ears, 343 Nonplanar graphs, 724–725 Nonregular set, 891 recognition by Turing machine, 891 Nonresidue quadratic, 286 Nonseparable graph, 683 Nonterminals, 849 NOR, 821, 843 NOR gate, 828 Normal form disjunction, 35 prenex, 68 NOT, 18

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Index I-15

Notation big-O , 205, 232 big-Omega (), 214, 232 big-Theta, 215 big-Theta (), 232 dependency, 846 for products well-formed formula in, 784 infix, 779–782, 804 little-o, 218 Polish, 780, 804 postfix, 779–782, 804, 858 prefix, 779–782, 804 product, 186 reverse Polish, 781, 804, 858 set builder, 116, 185 summation, 162, 186 NOT gate, 21 Noun, 848 Noun phrase, 848 Nova, 107 NP, class of nondeterministic polynomial-time problems, 900 NP-complete problems, 227, 715, 830, 900 Null quantification, 56 Null set, 185 Null string, 849 Number(s) Bacon, 680 Bell, 618 cardinal, 121 Carmichael, 283, 306 Catalan, 507 chromatic, 728, 737 edge, 734 crossing, 726 computable, 886 Cunningham, 262 Erd˝os, 635, 680, 689 Fibonacci, 347, 365–367, 771 formula for, 517 iterative algorithm for, 366 rabbits and, 502–503 recursive algorithms for, 365 harmonic inequality of, 320–321 independence, 741 irrational, 85, 116 large, law of, 459 Lucas, 379, 525 lucky, 570 natural, 116 pseudorandom, 288 Ramsey, 404 rational, 85, 116 real, A-1–A-5 Stirling, of the first kind, 431 signless, 443 Stirling, of the second kind, 430 Ten Most Wanted, 262 Ulam, 188 Number-theoretic functions, 892 Numbering plan, 387 Number theory, 237 definition of, 237 Object, 118 Object(s) distinguishable, 428 and distinguishable boxes, 428–429 and indistinguishable boxes, 428–431

indistinguishable, 428 and indistinguishable boxes, 428–431 unlabeled, 428 Obligato game, 112 Octahedral die, 496 Octal expansions, 246, 306 Octal representation, 246, 306 Odd, 83 Odd pie fights, 325 Odlyzko, Andrew, 163 Odometer, 307 One’s complement representations, 256 One-to-one (injective) function counting, 387 One-to-one correspondence, 144, 186 One-to-one function, 141, 143, 186 On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS), 162 Only if, expressing conditional statement using, 7 Onto (surjective) function, 143, 186 number of, 560–562, 566 Open interval, 117, 332 Open problems, 106, 263–264 Operands, well-formed formula of, 351 Operation(s) bit, 11, 110 bitwise, 110 set, 127 Operations on n-ary relations, 586–588 Operator(s) bitwise, 12 logical, 109 negation, 4 logical, 109 selection, 586 well-formed formula of, 351 Opium, 475 Optimal algorithm, 230 Optimal for suitors, stable assignment, 343 Optimal solution, 198 Optimization problems, 198 OR, 18 Or exclusive, 5, 6 inclusive, 5 Oracle of Bacon, 680 Order, 207 of quantifiers, 58 Ordered n-tuple, 122 Ordered rooted tree, 749, 804, 806 Ordering dictionary, 435 lexicographic, 356, 435, 620–622 linear, 619 partial, 618–629, 633 quasi-ordering, 637 total, 619, 633 Ordered pair defined using sets, 126 Ordinary generating function, 537 Ore’s theorem, 701, 707 Ore, O., 701 Organizational tree, 750 OR gate, 21, 823, 843 Orientable graphs, 740 Orientation of undirected graph, 740 Out-degree of vertex, 654, 736 Output to an algorithm, 193

Output alphabet, 859 Outputs finite-state machines with, 859–863 finite-state machines without, 865 Output string finite-state machine, 861 P (n, r), 439 P, class of polynomial-time problems, 900 P=NP problem, 897 Pair, devil’s, 678 Pairs, forbidden, 234 Pairwise relatively prime integers, 306 Palindrome(s), 202, 397, 857 set of, 888 Paradigm Algorithmic, 224, 232 Paradox, 118, 185 barber, 16 Löb’s, 112 Russell’s, 126 St. Petersburg, 497 Parallel algorithms, 661 Parallel edges, 642 Parallel processing, 229, 661 tree-connected, 751–752 Parentheses, balanced strings of, 382 Parent of vertex, 747, 803 Parent relation, 580 Parity same, 83 Parity check bit, 290 Parse tree, 852–854, 899 Parsing bottom-up, 853 top-down, 853 Partial correctness, 372 Partial function, 152, 186, 889 codomain of, 152 domain of, 152 domain of definition, 152 undefined values, 152 Partially ordered set, 618 antichain in, 637 chain in, 637 comparable elements in, 622, 633 dense, 632 dual of, 630 greatest element of, 625, 634 Hasse diagram of, 622–624, 634 incomparable elements in, 622, 633 least element of, 625, 634 lower bound of, 625, 634 maximal element of, 624, 634 minimal element of, 624, 625, 634 upper bound of, 625, 634 well-founded, 632 Partial orderings, 618–629, 633 compatible total ordering from, 634 Partition, 552 of positive integer, 359, 431 of set, 612–614, 633 refinement of, 617 Partner valid, 234 Pascal’s identity, 418–419, 439 Pascal’s triangle, 419, 439 Pascal, Blaise, 282, 419, 445, 452 Passwords, 66, 391

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH I-16

Index

Paths, 678–681 and graph isomorphism, 687–688 counting between vertices, 688–689 Euler, 693–698, 736 Hamilton, 698–703, 736 in acquantanceship graphs, 680 in collaboration graphs, 680 in directed graphs, 599–600, 633, 736 in directed multigraphs, 679 in Hollywood graph, 680–681 in simple graphs, 679 in undirected graphs, 679 length of, in weighted graph, 708 of length n, 680 shortest, 707–716, 736 terminology of, 679 Payoff, 765 Pearl Harbor, 872 Pecking order, 741 Peirce, Charles Sanders, 38 Peirce arrow, 36 Pelc, A., 536 Pendant vertex, 652, 736 Pennies, 199 Perfect integer, 272 Perfect power, 93 Perfect square, 83 Peripatetics, 2 Permutation, circular, 415 Permutations, 407–409, 439 generating, 434–436 generating random, 499 inversions in, expected number of, 482–484 with indistinguishable objects, 427–428 with repetition, 423 PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique), 639 Petersen, Julius Peter Christian, 706 Phrase-structure grammar, 849, 899 Phrase-structure grammars, 849–854 Pick’s theorem, 342 Pie fights, odd, 325 Pigeonhole principle, 86, 399–405, 439 applications with, 403–405 generalized, 401–403, 439 Planar graphs, 718–725, 736 Plato, 2 Plato’s Academy, 2, 259 PNF (prenex normal form, 68 Pogo stick, motorized, 812 Pointer, position of, digital representation of, 702–703 Poisonous snakes, 763 Poker hands, 411 Polish notation, 780, 804 Polygon, 338 convex, 338 diagonal of, 338 exterior of, 338 interior of, 338 nonconvex, 338 sides of, 338 simple, 338 vertices of, 338 with nonoverlapping ears, 343 Polynomial-time algorithm for primality, 262 Polynomial-time problems class of, 900 Polynomial complexity, 225 Polynomials big-O estimates for, 212 big-O estimates of, 209 big-Theta estimates for, 216

Polynomials, rook, 571 Polyominoes, 105, 326 Ponens modus, 71 Population of the world, 168 Poset, 618, 633 antichain in, 637 chain in, 637 comparable elements in, 619, 633 dense, 632 dual of, 630 greatest element of, 625, 634 Hasse diagram of, 622–624, 634 incomparable elements in, 619, 633 least element of, 625, 634 lower bound of, 625, 634 maximal element of, 624, 634 minimal element of, 624, 625, 634 upper bound of, 625, 634 well-founded, 632 Positive false, 471 true, 471 Positive integers axioms for, A-5 Postcondition, 372 Postconditions, 39 Postfix form, 781 Postfix notation, 779–782, 804, 858 Postorder traversal, 773, 776–778, 804 Postulates, 81 Potrzebie System of Weights and Measures, 208 Powerball, Lottery, 496 Power generator, 292 Powers of relation, 580–581, 633 Power series, 538–541 formal, 538 Power set, 121, 185 Pre-image of an element, 139, 186 Precedence of logical operators, 11 of quantifiers, 44 Precedence graphs, 647 Precondition(s), 39, 372 Predicate, 110 truth set of, 125 Predicate calculus, 40 Predicate logic, 37 Prefix codes, 762–764, 804 Prefix form, 780 Prefix notation, 779–782, 804 well-formed formula in, 784 Premise of a condition statement, 6, 110 Premises of an argument, 69, 70 Prenex normal form (PNF), 68 Preorder traversal, 773–775, 778, 804 Prim’s algorithm, 798–799, 804 Prim, Robert Clay, 798, 800 Primality testing, 464–465 Primary key, 585–586, 633 Prime, 257, 306 Mersenne, 306 primitive root of a, 306 probability positive integer less than n is, 262 Prime(s) arithmetic progression of, 263 conjectures about, 263 distribution of, 261 in arithmetic progressions, 262 infinitude of, 260 Mersenne, 261, 306 of form n2 + 1, 264

primitive root of a, 306 probability positive integer less than n is, 262 twin, 264 Prime factorization, 259 Prime implicant, 832, 843 essential, 832 Prime number theorem, 262, 636 Primitive root of a prime, 284, 306 Prince of Mathematics, 241 Princess of Parallelograms, 31 Principia Mathematica (Whitehead and Russell), 34 Principia Mathematica, 119 Principle(s) duality, for Boolean identities, 816 of buoyancy, A-4 of counting, 385–390 of inclusion–exclusion, 392–394, 553–557, 566 alternative form of, 559 applications with, 558–564 of mathematical induction, 377 of well-founded induction, 635 of well-ordered induction, 620 pigeonhole, 86, 399–405, 439 applications with, 403–405 generalized, 401–403, 439 Principle of inclusion–exclusion, 128 Private key cryptosystem, 298, 306 RSA system, 301 Prize, Nobel, 119 Probabilistic algorithms, 445, 463–465, 494 Probabilistic method, 465–466, 494 Probabilistic primality testing, 464–465 Probabilistic reasoning, 450 Probability, discrete, 445–500 assigning, 453–455 conditional, 453, 456–457, 494 finite, 445–448 in medical test results, 471–472 Laplace’s definition of, 446 of collision in hashing functions, 462–463 of combinations of events, 449–450, 455–456 Probability distribution, 453 Probability generating function, 552 Probability positive integer less than n is prime, 262 Probability theory, 445, 452–466 Probing function, 288 Problem(s) n-queens, 792–793 art gallery, 735 birthday, 461–463 bridge, 693–694, 696, 697 celebrity, 332 Chinese postman, 698 class of NP-complete, 897 class P, 896 closest-pair, 532–535 Collatz, 107 decidable, 895 decision, 894, 900 discrete logarithm, 284 halting, 201, 895, 900 hatcheck, 481, 562 Hilbert’s 23, 895 Hilbert’s Tenth Problem, 895 intractable, 226, 232, 897 jealous husband, 693 Josephus, 512 Kakutani’s, 107 kissing, 163 knapsack, 235, 568 load balancing, 235 longest common subsequence, 568 matrix-chain multiplication, 513 maximum satisfiability, 498

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Index I-17

Millennium Prize, 227 Newton–Pepys, 500 NP, 227, 896 NP-complete, 227, 715, 830, 900 P, 227 P=NP, 897 P versus NP, 227 open, 106, 263–264 optimization, 198 problem, two children, 498 satisfiability, 34, 227 Satisfiability solving, 34 scheduling greedy algorithm for final exams, 731, 732 searching, 194 shortest-path, 707–716, 736 solvable, 226, 232, 895, 900 Syracuse, 107 tiling, 895 tractable, 226, 232, 897 traveling salesman, 714–716, 736 traveling salesperson, 702, 709 two children, 498 Ulam’s, 107 undecidable, 895 unsolvable, 226, 232, 895, 900 utilities-and-houses, 718 yes-or-no, 894 Probl‘eme de rencontres, 563, 571 Probl‘eme des ménages, 571 Procedure statements, A-11 Processing concurrent, 647 parallel, 229, 661 tree-connected, 751–752 Product Boolean, 811–812, 821, 843 matrix, 179 Product-of-sums expansion, 820 Production, 899 Productions, 849 of grammar, 849 Product notation, 186 Product rule, 386 Program correctness, 372–378 conditional statements for, 373–375 loop invariants for, 375–376 partial, 372 program verification for, 372–373 rules of inference for, 373 Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT), 639 Programming logic, 51 Programming, dynamic, 507 Programming languages, 398, 611 Program verification, 372–373 Progression arithmetic, 186 geometric, 157, 186 sums of, 318–319 Projection of n-ary relations, 586, 633 Prolog, 51, 74 Proof(s), 81, 110 adapting, 101 by cases, 92–110 common errors with, 95 by contradiction, 86, 110 by contraposition, 83, 110 by exhaustion, 93 by mathematical induction, 315–329 by structural induction, 353

combinatorial, 412, 439 constructive existence, 96 direct, 82, 1180 existence, 96 indirect, 83 mistakes in, 89 nonconstructive existence, 96 of equivalence, 87 of recursive algorithms, 364–367 trivial, 84, 110 uniqueness, 99, 110 vacuous, 84, 110 Proof strategy, 85, 100–106 Proper subset, 185 Properties of algorithms, 193 Property Archimedean, A-5 Completeness, A-2 Well-ordering, 340–341, 378, A-5 Proposition(s), 2, 81, 109 compound, 3, 25, 27 109 negation of, 3, 109 Propositional equivalences, 129 Propositional calculus, 3 Propositional function, 110 Propositional logic, 3 applications of, 16 argument, 70 rules of inference for, 71 Propositional variable(s), 2, 109 Protein interaction graph, 648 Protestant Noncomformists, 472 Protocol(s) cryptographic, 302 Diffie–Helman key agreement, 302 key exchange, 305, 306 Pseudocode, 192, A-11–A-15 Pseudograph, 643, 644, 735 Pseudoprime, 282, 306 strong, 286 to the base b, 282 Pseudorandom numbers, 288 generated by linear congruential method, 288 middle-square generator, 292 power generator for, 292 pure multiplicative generator of, 289 Public key cryptosystem, 298 encryption, 306 RSA system, 299 Pumping lemma, 888 Pure multiplicative generator, 289 Pushdown automaton, 886 Puzzle “Voyage Around the World,”, 700 Birthday Problem, 461–463 Icosian, 698 jigsaw, 342 knights, knaves, and normals, 112 knights, knaves, and spies, 112 knights and knaves, 19 the lady or the tiger, 24 logic(, 19 logic), 20 Monty Hall Three Door, 450, 452, 476, 499 muddy children, 19 Reve’s, 504 river crossing, 692 Sudoku, 32 Sun-Tsu’s, 277 Tower of Hanoi, 503–504 zebra, 24

P versus NP problem, 227 Pythagorean triples, 106 Pan.ini, 854 Quadratic congruence, 285 Quadratic mean, 108 Quadratic nonresidue, 286 Quadratic residue, 286 Quad trees, 809 Quality control, 463 Quantification, 40 as loops, 58 existential, 42, 110 null, 56 universal, 110 Quantification, universal, 40 Quantified Expressions negating, 46 Quantified statement(s) restricted domain, 124 rules of inference for, 75 rules of inference for), 77 Quantifier existential, 42 scope of, 45, 110 uniqueness, 44 universal, 40 Quantifiers De Morgan’s law, 47 nested negating, 63–64 nested(, 57 nested), 64 order of, 58 precedence of, 44 use in system specifications, 50 Quarters, 199 Quasi-ordering, 637 Queen of mathematics, 241 Queen of the sciences, 241 Queens on chessboard, 740 Question, begging the, 90, 110 Quick sort, 196, 371 Quine, Willard van Orman, 837, 839 Quine–McCluskey method, 830, 837–840 Quotient, 238, 239, A-6 Quotient automaton, 878 r -combination, 410, 439 r -permutation, 407, 439 Rabbits, 502–503 Races, horse, 31 Radius of graph, 741 Rado, Tibor, 899 Ramanujan, Srinivasa, 97, 98 Ramaré, O., 264 Ramsey, Frank Plumpton, 404 Ramsey number, 404 Ramsey theory, 404 Random permutation, generating, 499 Random simple graph, 742 Random variables, 454, 460–461 covariance of, 494 definition of, 494 distribution of, 460, 494 geometric, 484–485 expected values of, 477–480, 491, 494 independent, 485–487, 494 indicator, 492 standard deviation of, 487 variance of, 477–480, 494 Range of a function, 139, 186 Ratio common, 157

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH I-18

Index

Rational number(s), 85, 116 countability of, 172 Reachable, 807 Reachable state, 901 Real-valued function, 140 Real number decimal expansion of a, 174 Real numbers constructing, A-5 least upper bound, A-2 set of, 116 upper bound, A-2 Reasoning circular, 90, 110 deductive, 312 forward, 100 inductive, 312 probabilistic, 450 Recognized language, 868 Recognized strings, 868 Recognizer language, 863 Rencontres, 563, 571 Records, 584 Recurrence relation(s), 158, 186, 501–510 associated homogenous, 520 definition of, 158, 565 divide-and-conquer, 527–535 initial condition for, 158 linear homogenous, 514–520, 565 linear nonhomogenous, 520–524, 565 modeling with, 502–507 simultaneous, 526 solution of, 158 solving, 514–524 generating functions for, 546–548 solving using iteration, 159 Recursion, 344 Recursive algorithms, 360–370, 378 correctness of, 364 for binary search, 363 for computing a n , 361 for computing greatest common divisor, 362 for factorials, 361 for Fibonacci numbers, 365 for linear search, 363 for modular exponentiation, 363 proving correct, 364–367 trace of, 361, 362 Recursive definitions, 311, 345–357 of extended binary trees, 352 of factorials, 361 of functions, 345–349, 378 of a sequence, 158 of sets, 349–356, 378 of strings, 349 of structures, 349–356 Recursive merge sort, 368 Recursive modular exponentiation, 363 Recursive sequential search algorithm, 363 Recursive step, 349 Reentrant knight’s tour, 707 Refinement, of partition, 617 Reflexive closure of relation, 598, 634 Reflexive relation, 576, 633 representing using digraphs, 594–596 using matrices, 591 Regions of planar representation graphs, 719, 736 Regular expression, 899 Regular expressions, 879 Regular grammar(s), 851, 884, 899, 900 Regular graph, 667

Regular language, 851 Regular set(s), 878–879, 884, 899, 900 constructing automaton to recognize, 881 Relation, 124 recurrence, 158, 186 Relation(s), 573–639 n-ary, 583–589, 633 domain of, 584 operations on, 586–588 “greater than or equal,”, 618–619 “less than or equals,”, 619 antisymmetric, 577–578, 633 asymmetric, 582 binary, 573, 633 circular, 635 closures of, 597–606, 633 reflexive, 598, 633 symmetric, 598, 634 transitive, 597, 600–603, 634 combining, 579–580 complementary, 582 composite of, 580, 633 connectivity, 600, 633 counting, 578–579 covering, 623, 631 diagonal, 598 divide-and-conquer recurrence, 527 divisibility, 619 domains of, 584 equivalence, 607–614, 633 functions as, 574 inclusion, 619 inverse, 582, 633 irreflexive, 581 on set, 575–576 parent, 580 paths in, 599–600 powers of, 580–633 properties of, 576–579 reflexive, 576, 633 representing using digraphs, 594–596 using matrices, 591–594 symmetric, 577–578, 634 transitive, 578–580, 633 Relational database model, 584–586, 633 Relation on a set, 124 Relative frequency letters of English, 296 Relatively prime integers, 306 Remainder, 239, 306 Removing and edge from a graph, 663 Removing an edge from a vertices, 664 Repetition combinations with, 424–427 permutations with, 423 Replacement sampling with, 448 sampling without, 448 Representation base b, 306 binary, 306 octal, 306 unary, 892 Representation hexadecimal, 306 Representations one’s complement, 256 two’s complement, 256 Representative, of equivalence class, 610 Residue quadratic, 286 Resolution, 74 Resolution (rule of inference), 71

Restricted domain of quantified statement, 124 quantifier with, 44 return statement, A-15 Reve’s puzzle, 504 Reverse-delete algorithm, 803 Reverse Polish notation, 781, 804 reverse Polish notation, 858 Right child of vertex, 749 Right subtree, 749 Right triominoes, 326, 333 Ring commutative, 244 Ring topology for local area network, 661 River crossing puzzle, 692 Rivest Ronald, 300 Rivest, Ronald, 299 RNA (ribonucleic acid), 388 RNA chain sequencing, 443 Roadmaps, 647 Rock climbing, 163 Rocket-powered Frisbee, 812 Rook polynomials, 571 Root primitive, 284 Rooted Fibonacci trees, 757 Rooted spanning tree, 797 Rooted trees, 351, 747–749 Sk -tree, 806 B-tree of degree k , 805 balanced, 753, 804 binomial, 805 decision trees, 760–762 definition of, 803 height of, 753, 804 level order of vertices of, 806 ordered, 749, 804, 806 Roots, characteristic, 515 Roster method, 116, 185 Round-robin tournaments, 341, 649 Routing transit number (RTN), 308 check digit, 308 Row of a matrix, 178 Roy, Bernard, 603 Roy–Warshall algorithm, 603–606 RSA system, 299 cryptosystem, 299, 301, 306 decryption, 300 decryption key, 301 digital signatures, 303 encryption 299 private key, 301 public key, 301 Rule division, 394 product, 386 subtraction, 393 sum, 386, 389, 439 Rule(s) of inference, 69–71, 110 addition, 71 building arguments using, 73 conjunction, 71 disjunctive syllogism, 71 for program correctness, 373 for propositional logic, 71 for quantified statements, 75–77 hypothetical syllogism, 71 modus ponens, 71 modus tollens, 71 resolution, 71, 74 simplification, 71 Run, 492 Russell’s paradox, 126 Russell, Bertrand, 118, 119

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Index I-19

Sk -tree, 806 Same parity, 83 Samos, Michael, 533 Sample space, 446 Sampling without replacement, 448 with replacement, 448 Sandwich, 858 Sanskrit, 854 Satisfiability, 30 Satisfiability problem, 227 solving, 34 modeling Sudoku puzzle as, 32 Satisfiability problem, maximum, 498 Satisfiable compound proposition, 30, 110 Saturated hydrocarbons, trees modeling, 750 Saxena, Nitin, 262 Scheduling problems final exams, 731, 732 greedy algorithm for, 324–325 software projects, 633 talks, 200 tasks, 629 Schröder, Ernst, 175 Schröder–Bernstein theorem, 174 Scimitars, Mohammed’s, 697 Scope of a quantifier, 45, 110 Screw, Archimedes, A-4 Search binary, 194 linear, 194 sequential, 194 Search engines, 794 Searches Boolean, 18 Searching algorithms, 194–196, 232 binary, 528 breadth-first, 789–791, 804 depth-first, 787–789, 804 applications with, 794–795 in directed graphs, 794–795 linear average-case complexity of, 482–484 recursive, 363 recursive binary, 363 recursive linear, 363 recursive sequential, 363 Searching problems, 194 Search trees, binary, 757–759, 804 Searcing web pages, 18 Second principle of mathematical induction, 334 Secret key exchange, 302 Seed for linear congruential method, 288 Sees, 735 Selection operator, 586, 633 Selection sort, 196, 203 Self-complementary graph, 677 Self-converse directed graph, 740 Self-dual, 844 Self-generating sequences, 382 Semantics, 847 Sentence, 848, 849 Separating set, 684 Sequence(s), 156, 186 de Bruijn, 744 Fibonacci, 158 finding maximum and minimum of, 528 generating functions for, 537

integer, 162 Lucas, 162 recursive definition of, 158 self-generating, 382 strictly decreasing, 403 strictly increasing, 403 unimodal, 568 Sequencing RNA chains, 443 Sequential search algorithm, 194 Serial algorithms, 661 Series geometric, 164 harmonic, 321 infinite, 167 power, 538–541 formal, 538 Set(s), 185 Cartesian product of, 123 complement of, 128, 129, 186 computer representation of, 134 countable, 171, 186 cut, 806 difference of, 128, 186 disjoint, 128 dominating, 739 element of, 185 elements of a, 116 empty, 118, 185 finite, 121, 185, 553, 565 combinations of, 437–438 counting of subsets, 388 number of subsets of, 323 union of three, number of elements in, 554–556, 566 union of two, number of elements in, 553, 565 fuzzy, 138 guarding, 735 image of, 141 infinite, 121 linearly ordered, 619, 633 member of, 185 members of a, 116 nonregular, 891 not recognized by finite-set automata, 885 null, 185 of complex numbers, 116 of irrational numbers, 116 of natural numbers, 116 of palindromes, 888 of rational numbers, 116 of real numbers, 116 partially ordered, 618, 633 antichain in, 637 chain in, 637 comparable elements in, 619, 633 dense, 632 dual of, 630 greatest element of, 625, 634 Hasse diagram of, 622–624, 634 incomparable elements in, 619, 622, 633 least element of, 625, 634 lower bound of, 625, 634 maximal element of, 624, 634 minimal element of, 624, 625, 634 upper bound of, 625, 634 well-founded, 632 partition of, 612–613, 633 power, 121, 185 proofs of facts about, by mathematical induction, 321 recognized by Turing machines, 891–892 recursively defined, 349–356, 378 regular, 878, 879, 884, 899 relation on, 575–576

relation on, 124 representing with a bit string, 134 separating, 684 singleton, 118 successor of, 137 symmetric difference of, 186 totally ordered, 619, 633 uncountable, 186 union of, 127, 185 universal, 118, 185 well-ordered, 381, 620, 633 Set builder notation, 116, 185 Set description by listing its members, 116 by the roster method, 116 using set builder notation, 116 Set equality, 117, 185 Set identities, 129–132 absorption laws, 129 associative laws for, 129 Cartesian product of, 123 commutative laws for, 129 De Morgan’s laws for, 129 difference of, 128, 186 distributive laws for, 129 domination laws for, 129 idempotent laws for, 129 identity laws for, 129 intersection of, 127, 185 Set of real numbers cardinality of, 186 uncountability of, 173 Set operations, 127 Sex, 458 Shamir, Adi, 299, 300 Shannon, Claude, 20 Shannon, Claude Elwood, 811, 812 Sheffer, Henry Maurice, 34 Sheffer stroke, 34, 36 Shift cipher, 295, 306 cryptanalysis, 296 Shift ciphers cryptosystem, 298 Shifting, 252 Shifting index of summation, 164 Shift register, 846 Shortest-path algorithm, 709–714 Shortest-path problems, 707–716, 736 Showing two sets are equal, 121 Sibling of vertex, 747, 803 Sides of a polygon, 338 Sieve of Eratosthenes, 259, 306, 560, 565 Signature digital, 306 Signatures digital, 303 Signed integer, 855 Simple circuit, 679 Simple directed graph, 643 Simple graphs, 642, 654–658, 735 coloring of, 727 connected planar, 719–723 crossing number of, 726 dense, 670 edges of, 642, 663 isomorphic, 671–675, 736 orientation of, 740 paths in, 679 random, 742 self-complementary, 677 sparse, 670 thickness of, 726 vertices of, 642, 663 with spanning trees, 785–787

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH I-20

Index

Simple polygon, 338 triangulation of, 338 Simplification (rule of inference), 71 Single-elimination tournament, 649 Single error in an identification number, 291 Singleton set, 118 Sink, 901 Six Degrees of Separation (Guare), 680 Slackness of a job, 235 Sloane Neil, 162 Sloane, Neil, 163 Smullyan, Raymond, 19, 20 Snakes, poisonous, 763 Sneakers, 300 Soccer players, 475 Social networks, 644 Socks, 405 Software origin of term, 11 Software systems, 17 Sollin’s algorithm, 803 Solution optimal, 198 Solution of a recurrence relation, 158 Solvable problem, 232, 895, 900 Solvable problems, 226 Solving linear congruences, 277 Solving satisfiability problems, 34 Solving Sudoku puzzles, 32 Solving systems of linear congruences, 277–279 by back substitution, 279 Solving using generating functions counting problems, 541–546 recurrence relations, 546–548 Sort binary insertion, 203 binary insertion sort, 196 bubble, 196, 232 bidirectional, 233 insertion, 196, 197, 232 average-case complexity of, 483–484 library, 196 Merge, 196 merge, 367–370, 378, 528 complexity of, 532 recursive, 368 quick, 196, 371 selection, 196, 203 tournament, 196, 770 Sorting, 196–198, 232 Sorting algorithms, 196, 198 topological, 627–629, 634 Space, sample, 446 Space Complexity, 232 Space complexity, 219 Space probe, 476 Spam, 472–475 Spam filters, Bayesian, 472–475 Spanning forest, 796 minimum, 802 Spanning trees, 785–795, 804 building by breadth-first search, 789–791 by depth-first search, 787–789 definition of, 785 degree-constrained, 806 distance between, 797 in IP multicasting, 786 maximum, 802 minimum, 797–802, 804 rooted, 797 Sparse graphs, 670, 802

Sparse matrix, 670 Specification of a Turing machine, 889 Specifications system, 17 Specifying algorithms, 192 Spiders, Web, 794 Spies, 112 SQL, 588–589, 855 Square perfect, 83 Squarefree integer, 564 Square Matrix diagonal of, 181 inverse of, 184 Square zero–one matrix Boolean power of, 183 St. Petersburg Paradox, 497 Stable assignment, 343 Stable matching, 204 Stable matching problem variations on, 234 Standard deck, 402 Standard deviation, 487 Star Height, 901 Star topology for local area network, 661 Start symbol, 849 State accepting finite-state automaton, 867 final finite-state automaton, 867 initial, 859 finite-state automaton, 867 reachable, 901 transient, 901 State diagram for finite-state machine, 860 Strategy proof, 102 Statement conditional, XX biconditional, 9 Statement(s), A-11 if then, 6 procedure, A-11 assignment, A-11–A-12 blocks of, A-14–A-15 conditional, 6–9 for program correctness, 373–375 Statement, return, A-15 Statements logically equivalent, 45 Statement variables, 2 States, 859 State table for finite-state machine, 860 Stephen Cook, 227 Steroids, 475 Stirling’s formula, 151 Stirling, James, 151 Stirling numbers of the first kind, 431 signless, 443 Stirling numbers of the second kind, 430 Strategies minmax, 767, 804 proof(, 100, 106 Strategy proof, 85 Strictly decreasing function, 143 Strictly decreasing sequence, 403 Strictly increasing function, 143

Strictly increasing sequence, 403 String, 186 bit, 110 empty, 186, 849 null, 849 recognized by Turing machine, 891 String(s) bit, 12 String matching, 231 Strings, 157 concatenation, 866 concatenation of, 350 counting, 388 without consecutive 0s, 505 decoding, 762–763 distinguishable, 888 generating next largest, 437 indistinguishable, 888 length of, 505 recursive definition of, 350 lexicographic ordering of, 620 of parentheses, balanced, 382 recognized (accepted), 868 recursively defined, 349 ternary, 511 Stroke Sheffer, 34 Stroke, Sheffer, 36 Strong induction, 333–335, 378 Strongly connected components of graphs, 686, 736 Strongly connected graphs, 685 Strong pseudoprime, 286 Structural induction, 353–356, 378 proof by, 353 Structured query language, 588–589 Structures, recursively defined, 349–356 Stuarts, 151 Subgraph, 663, 739 Subsequence, 403 Subset, 119, 185 proper, 185 Subsets of finite set counting, 388 number of, 323 sums of, 793 Subtraction rule, 393 Subtractors full, 828 half, 828 Subtree, 746, 748, 803 Success, 458 Successor of integer, A-5 Successor of a set, 137 Sudoku modeling as a satisfiability problem, 32 Sudoku puzzle, 32 Sufficient necessary and, 9 Sufficient condition, 6 expressing a conditional statement using, 6 Sufficient for, 6 Suitees, 204 Suitors, 204, 343 optimal for, 343 Sum(s) Boolean, 811–812, 821, 843 of first n positive integers, 315 of first n positive integers, 317 of geometric progressions, 318–319 of subsets, 793 Sum-of-products expansions, 820–821, 843 simplifying, 828–840

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Index I-21

Summation index of, 163 lower limit, 163 notation, 162, 186 shifting index of, 164 upper limit, 163 Summation formulae proving by mathematical induction, 315–318 Sum of multisets, 138 Sum of terms of a geometric progression, 164 Sum rule, 386, 389, 439 Sun-Tsu, 277 Superman, 80 Surjection, 143, 186 Surjective (onto) function number of, 560–562, 566 Surjective function, 143 Switching circuits, hazard-free, 846 Symbol(s), 849 start, 849 terminal, 849 Symbol, Landau, 206 Symbolic Logic (Venn), 120 Symmetric closure of relation, 598, 634 Symmetric difference of two sets, 186 Symmetric matrix, 181, 186 Symmetric relation, 577–578, 633 representing using digraphs, 595 using matrices, 591–592 Syntax, 847 System RSA, 299 Systems hardware, 17 software, 17 Systems of linear congruence, 277–279 System specifications, 17, 50 consistent, 18 T-shirts, 395 Table truth, 4, 109 Table(s) state for finite-state machine, 860 Table, circular, 394 Table membership, 186 Tao, Terence, 263 Tape Turing machine, 889 Tautology, 25, 110 Tee-shirts, 395 Telephone call graph, 682 Telephone calls, 646 Telephone lines computer network with diagnostic, 642 computer network with multiple, 642 computer network with multiple one-way, 642 computer network with one-way, 643 Telephone network, 646, 682 Telephone number, 646 Telephone numbering plan, 387 Template for proofs by mathematical induction, 329 “Ten Most Wanted” numbers, 262 Terminals, 849 Terminal vertex, 594, 654 Terms of a sequence closed formula for, 159 Ternary search algorithm, 203 Ternary string, 511

Test Miller’s, 286 primality, 464–465 probabilistic primality, 464–465 Tetromino, 109 TeX, 208 The Art of Computer Programming (Donald Knuth), 196 THE BOOK, 260 The Elements, 260 The Elements(Euclid), 267 The lady or the tiger puzzle, 24 Theorem(s), 81, 110 alternate names for, 81 Archimedean property, A-5 art gallery, 735 Bayes’, 468–475 Bézout’s, 269, 306 binomial, 415–418, 439 Cantor’s, 177 Chinese remainder, 277, 306 Cook–Levin, 227 Dirac’s, 701 extended binomial, 540 Fermat’s last, 106 Fermat’s little, 281, 306 four color, 728–731, 737 fundamental, theorem of arithmetic, 258, 336–337 Green–Tao, 263 Hall’s marriage, 659 handshaking, 653 Jordan curve, 338 Kleene’s, 880, 900 Kuratowski’s, 724–725, 737 Lamé’s, 347 master, 532 methods of proof, 82 multinomial, 434 Ore’s, 701, 707 Pick’s, 342 prime number, 262 proving, automated, 114 Schröder–Bernstein, 174 Wilson’s, 285 Theory, naive set, 118 Theory, Ramsey, 404 Thesis, Church–Turing, 893 Thickness of a graph, 726 Threshold function, 845 Threshold gate, 845 Threshold value, 845 Thue, Axel, 849 Tic-tac-toe, 766 Tiger, 24 Tiling(s), 103 Tiling of checkerboard, 326 Time complexity, 219, 232 average-case time, 232 average case, 220 of algorithm for finding maximum, 219 of linear search algorithm, 220 worst case, 220, 232 Tooth fairy, 112 Top-down parsing, 853 Topological sorting, 627–629, 634 Topology for local area network hybrid, 661 ring, 661 star, 661 Torus, 726 Total expectation, law of, 492 Total function, 152 Totally ordered set, 619, 633

Total ordering, 619, 633 compatible, 628, 634 Tournament, 741 round-robin, 468, 649 single-elimination, 649 Tournament sort, 196, 770 Tower of Hanoi, 503–504 Trace of recursive algorithm, 361, 362 Tractable problem(s), 226, 232, 897 Trail, 679 Transducer(s) finite-state, 859 Transformation affine, 296 Transformations, 139 Transient state, 901 Transition function, 859 extended, 867 extending, 867 extension, 867 Transition rule(s) Turing machine, 889 Transitive closure of relation, 597, 600–603, 634 computing, 603–606 Transitive relation, 578–580, 633 representing, using digraphs, 596 Transitivity law, A-2 Translating English sentences to logical expressions, 16–17, 62–63 mathematical statements to logical expressions, 60, 61 nested quantifiers into English, 61–62 logical statements into English, 61–62 Transpose of a matrix, 181, 186 Transposition cipher, 297 decryption, 297 encryption, 297 Transposition error, 291 “Traveler’s Dodecahedron,”, 698, 700 Traveling salesperson problem, 702, 709, 714–716, 736 Traversal of tree, 772–782, 804 inorder, 773, 775, 778, 804 level-order, 806 postorder, 773, 776–778, 804 preorder, 773–775, 778, 804 Tree derivation, 899 parse, 899 Tree(s), 745–802 m-ary, 748, 804 complete, 756 height of, 754–755 applications of, 757–769 as models, 749–752 AVL, 808 binary, 352–353, 748, 749 extended, 352 full, 352–353 binary search, 757–759, 804 binomial, 805 caterpillar, 807 decision, 760–762, 804 definition of, 746 derivation, 852–854 extended binary, 352 family, 745 full m-ary, 748, 752, 804 full binary, 352 game, 764–769 graceful, 807 height-balanced, 808 labeled, 756 mesh of, 809

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH I-22

Index

Tree(s)—Cont. parse, 852 properties of, 752–755 quad, 809 rooted, 351, 747–749 Sk -tree, 806 B-tree of degree k , 805 balanced, 753, 804 binomial, 805 decision trees, 760–762 definition of, 803 height of, 753, 804 level order of vertices of, 806 ordered, 749, 804, 806 rooted Fibonacci, 757 spanning, 785–795, 804 definition of, 785 degree-constrained, 806 distance between, 797 in IP multicasting, 786 maximum, 802 minimum, 797–802, 804 rooted, 797 Tree-connected network, 751–752 Tree-connected parallel processors, 751–752 Tree diagrams, 394–395, 439 Tree edges, 788 Tree traversal, 772–782, 804 inorder, 773, 775, 778, 804 postorder, 773, 776–778, 804 preorder, 773–775, 778, 804 Trial division, 258 Triangle inequality, 108 Triangle, Pascal’s, 419, 439 Triangulation, 338 Trichotomy Law, A-2 Tricks, magic, 20 Triomino(es), 105, 326, 333 Right, 105, 333 straight, 105 Trivial proof, 84, 110 True negative, 471 True positive, 471 Truth set of a predicate, 125 Truth table(s), 4, 109 for biconditional statements, 9 for conditional statement, 6 for conjuction, 4 for disjunction, 4 for exclusive or, 6 for logical equivalences, 27 for negation, 4 for XOR, 6 of compound propositions, 10 Truth value, 3, 109 of implication, 6 Tukey, John Wilder, 11 coining words, 11 Turing, Alan Mathison, 226, 886 Turing Award, 854 Turing machine, 847, 886, 888, 889, 893, 899 computing functions with, 892–893 control unit, 889 definition of, 889 final state, 891 halts, 891 in computational complexity, 894 initial position, 889 initial state, 889 nondeterministic, 893, 899 recognition of nonregular set, 891 sets recognized by, 891, 892

specification, 889 string recognition by, 891 tape, 889 transition rules, 889 types of, 893 Twin prime conjecture, 264 Twin primes, 264 Two’s complement representations, 256 Two-dimensional array, 662–663 Two children problem, 498 Type, 117 Type 0 grammar, 851, 899 Type 1 grammar, 851, 899 Type 2 grammar, 851, 899 Type 3 grammar, 851, 883, 899 U. S. Coast Survey, 38 Ulam’s problem, 536 Ulam, Stanislaw, 536 Ulam numbers, 188 Unary representations, 892 Uncomputable function, 175, 186, 896, 900 Uncountability set of real numbers, 173 Uncountable set, 186 Undecidable problem, 895 Undefined values of partial function, 152 Underlying undirected graph, 654, 736 Undirected edges, 644, 735 of simple graph, 643 Undirected graphs, 644, 653, 735 connectedness in, 681–685 Euler circuit of, 694 Euler path of, 698 orientation of, 740 paths in, 679, 736 underlying, 654, 736 Unicasting, 786 Unicorns, 112 Unicycle, 812 Uniform distribution, 454, 494 Unimodal sequence, 568 Union of graphs, 664 of three finite sets, number of elements in, 554–556, 566 of two finite sets, number of elements in, 553, 565 Union of fuzzy sets, 138 Union of a collection of sets, 133 Union of multisets, 138 Union of sets, 127, 185 Uniqueness proof, 110 Uniqueness quantifier, 44 Uniquness proof, 99 Unit (Egyptian) fraction, 380 Unit-delay machine, 861–862 unit-delay machine, 861 United States Coast Survey, 38 Unit property, in Boolean algebra, 815 UNIVAC, 872 Univeral quantification, 110 Universal address system, 772–773 Universal generalization, 76 Universal instantiation, 75 Universal modus ponens, 77 Universal modus tollens, 77 Universal product code (UPC), 290 Universal quantification, 40 Universal quantifier, 40 Universal set, 118, 185

Universe of discourse, 40, 110 Unlabeled boxes, 428 objects, 428 Unless, 6 expressing conditional statement using, 7 Unsatisfiable compound proposition, 30 Unsolvable problem, 232, 895, 900 Unsolvable problems, 226 UPC check digit, 290 Upper bound, A-2 of lattice, 637 of poset, 625, 634 Upper limit of a summation, 163 Upper triangular matrix, 231 Utilities-and-houses problem, 718 Uzbekistan, 192 Vacuous proof, 84, 110 Valid argument, 69, 110 Valid argument form, 70, 110 Valid partner, 234 Value truth, 3, 109 Value(s) expected, 477–480, 491, 494 in hatcheck problem, 495 linearity of, 477–484, 494 of inversions in permutation, 482–484 final, A-14 initial, A-14 of tree, 767 of vertex in game tree, 767–769, 804 threshold, 845 Vandermonde’s identity, 420–421 Vandermonde, Alexandre-Théophile, 420 Variable(s) Boolean, 11, 110, 814, 820, 843 bound, 44, 110 free, 44, 110 propositional, 2, 109 random, 454, 460–461 covariance of, 494 definition of, 494 distribution of, 460, 494 expected values of geometric, 477–480 geometric, 484–485 geometric expected values of, 491, 494 independent, 485–487, 494 indicator, 492 standard deviation of, 487 variance of, 477–480, 494 statement, 2 Variance, 477, 487–490, 494 Veitch, E. W., 830 Vending machine, 858–859 Venn, John, 118, 120 Venn diagrams, 118, 185 Verb, 848 Verb phrase, 848 Vertex (vertices), 594 adjacent, 651, 654, 735 ancestor of, 747, 803 basis, 691 child of, 747, 749, 803 connecting, 651 connectivity, 684 counting paths between, 688–689 cut, 683, 684 degree of, 652 degree of, in undirected graph, 652 descendant of, 747, 804 distance between, 741 eccentricity of, 757 end, 654

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Bismillah hiir Rehman nir Raheem-----------------------------Assalat o Wasalam o Alika Ya RasoolALLAH Index I-23

Vertex (vertices)—Cont. in-degree of, 654, 736 independent set of, 741 initial, 594, 654 interior, 603 internal, 748, 804 isolated, 652, 736 level of, 753, 804 level order of, 806 number of, of full binary tree, 355 of directed graph, 643, 654 of directed multigraph, 644 of multigraph, 642 of polygon, 338 of pseudograph, 643 of simple graph, 642, 668 of undirected graph, 644, 652, 654 out-degree of, 654, 736 parent of, 747, 803 pendant, 652, 736 sibling of, 747, 803 terminal, 594, 654 value of, in game tree, 767–769, 804 Vertex set, 338 bipartition of, 656 Very large scale integration (VLSI) graphs, 744 Vigenère cipher, 304 cryptanalysis, 305 Vocabulary, 849, 899 “Voyage Around the World” Puzzle, 700 Walk, 679 closed, 679 Wall Street, 198 Warshall’s algorithm, 603–606 Warshall, Stephen, 603, 604

WAVES, Navy, 872 Weakly connected graphs, 686 Web crawlers, 646 Web graph, 646–647, 794 strongly connected components of, 686 Web page(s), 646, 686, 794 searching, 18 Web spiders, 794 Weighted graphs, 736 minimum spanning tree for, 798–802 shortest path between, 707–714 traveling salesperson problem with, 714–716 Well-formed expressions, 354 Well-formed formula, 350 for compound propositions, 354 in prefix notation, 784 of operators and operands, 351 structural induction and, 354 Well-founded induction, principle of, 635 Well-founded poset, 632 Well-ordered induction, 634 principle of, 620 Well-ordered set, 381, 620, 633 Well-ordering property, 340–341, 378, A-5 WFF’N PROOF, The Game of Modern Logic (Allen), 80, 114 Wheels, 655, 736 Wiles, Andrew, 107 Williamson, Malcolm, 302 Wilson’s theorem, 285 Winning strategy for chomp, 98 Without loss of Generality (WLOG), 95, 110 Witness(es) to big-O relationship, 205, 232 to an existence proof, 96

Witnesses to a big-O relationship, 232 WLOG (without loss of generality), 95 Word, 849 Word and Object (Quine), 839 World’s record, for twin primes, 264 World Cup soccer tournament, 415 World population, 168 World Wide Web graph, 646–647 Worst-case complexity insertion sort, 222 of binary search, 220 of bubble sort, 221 Worst-case time complexity, 232 Worst case time complexity, 220 XML, 855, 858 XOR, 110 Yahoo, 794 Yes-or-no problems, 894 Zebra puzzle, 24 Zermelo–Fraenel axioms, 176 Zero–one matrices Boolean product of, 182 join of, 181 meet of, 181 of transitive closure, 602–603 representing relations using, 591–594 Zero–one matrix, 181 Zero–one matrix, 186 Zero property, in Boolean algebra, 815 Ziegler’s Giant Bar, 208 Zodiac, signs of, 441

To Read Online & Download: WWW.ISSUU.COM/SHEIKHUHASSAN

Discrete mathematics and its applications (7th ed) by robert lafore (p3)

Published on Apr 4, 2014

Discrete mathematics and its applications (7th ed) by robert lafore (p3) for BSSE, BSCS, BSIT, PUCIT

Read more

Similar to

Popular now

Just for you