Issuu on Google+

Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

APPENDIXES submitted by The Municipality of San Juan, Puerto Rico November 15, 2011

VOL. 1


Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

List of Appendixes VOLUME 1 Appendix 1.3-1 Comparative Analysis of Intersection-5 Alternatives Appendix 1.4-1 Locally Preferred Alternative Appendix 1.4-2 Station Typology 1 – Side Platform – Plan Appendix 1.4-3 Station Typology 1 – Side Platform - Section Appendix 1.4-4 Station Typology 1 – Side Platform - Perspective Appendix 1.4-5 Station Typology 2 – Side Platform – Plan Appendix 1.4-6 Station Typology 2 – Side Platform - Perspective Appendix 4.1-1 Observed Floral Species Appendix 4.1-2 Observed Faunal Species Appendix 4.2-1 Surficial Geology Appendix 4.3-1 National Inventory Wetlands Appendix 4.4-1 Context Diagram Appendix 4.4-2 Isleta Building Uses Appendix 4.4-3 Santurce Building Uses Appendix 4.5-1 FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer Appendix 4.10-1 Noise Measurement Locations Appendix 4.11-1 Photo Survey of the Tren Liviano Corridor –1 Appendix 4.11-2 Photo Survey of the Tren Liviano Corridor –2 Appendix 4.11-3 Photo Survey of the Tren Liviano Corridor –3 Appendix 4.11-4 Photo Survey of the Tren Liviano Corridor –4 Appendix 4.11-5 Photo Survey of the Tren Liviano Corridor – 5 Appendix 4.11-6 Photo Survey of the Tren Liviano Corridor – 6 Appendix 4.11-7 Photo Survey of the Tren Liviano Corridor – 7 Municipality of San Juan

i


Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 4.11-8 Photo Survey of the Tren Liviano Corridor – 8 Appendix 4.11-9 Photo Survey of the Tren Liviano Corridor – 9 Appendix 4.12-1A Historic Resources -1 Appendix 4.12-1B Historic Resources -2 Appendix 4.12-1C Historic Resources -3 Appendix 4.12-1D Historic Resources -4 Appendix 4.12-1E Historic Resources -5 Appendix 4.12-2 Archaeological Resources Appendix 4.12-3 Archaeological Resources Appendix 5.7-1 Traffic Analysis Data Appendix 5.9-1 Air Quality Calculations for the Regional Mesoscale Analysis Appendix 5.11 Visual Conditions Analysis Appendix 6.3-1 Public Outreach: Articles, Notices and Weblinks

Municipality of San Juan

ii


Appendixes Vol. 1

Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 1.3-1

Comparative Analysis of Intersection 5 Alternatives

Municipality of San Juan


5 intersection

comparative analysis of alternatives

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


assumptions •

In order to achieve the established goal for Tren Liviano: improve connectivity provide jobs and economic growth opportunities reestablish old san juan as the city center rebrand the city image enhance livability improve environmental quality provide opportunity for redevelopment

•

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

It was assumed for this analysis that all alternatives will have a traffic reduction of 31% on the bridges as a result of parking policies

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


alternative 1 maintain existing roadway structures at intersection-5 with elevated alignment

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


alternative 1 maintain existing roadway structures at intersection-5 with elevated alignment

isleta Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

canal san antonio

|

Cambridge Systematics

santurce

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


alternative 1A

Alternative – A

maintain existing roadway structures at intersection-5 with partially elevated alignment

New traffic signal & rail crossing New Roads Improvements

Mix traffic lanes

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

New Elevated Guideway

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


alternative 2 roadway changes and temporary ramp removal at intersection-5 with at-grade alignment

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


alternative 2 refined- 2 Alternative

roadway changes and temporary ramp removal at intersection-5 with at-grade alignment

New Roads Improvements 2-lanes

Demolish Conc. Parapet

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


CANA L

alternative 3

SAN A

NTON IO

reconfiguration of intersection-5 to an at-grade roadway scheme with at-grade alignment

COND ADO LAGO ON

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

INTERSECTION-5 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS

Kanaan Consulting US, Inc. 721 Main Street, Suite 304

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

Waltham, MA 02451

KCUS www.kcus.org 1

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


comparison of vehicular movements FROM PR-1 (Munoz Rivera Expressway) TO Dr. Ashford Ave (Dos Hermanos Bridge)

CANAL SAN ANTONIO CONDADO LAGOON

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

Alternative 3

Alternative 2

Kanaan Consulting US, Inc. 721 Main Street, Suite 304 Waltham, MA 02451 www.kcus.org 1

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


comparison of vehicular movements

Alternative – 2 (to Condado)

FROM PR-1 (Munoz Rivera Expressway) TO Dr. Ashford Ave (Dos Hermanos Bridge)

New Roads Improvements 2-lanes

Demolish Conc. Parapet

Alternative 2 Refined Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


comparison of vehicular movements FROM PR-1 (Munoz Rivera Expressway) TO Ave. Fernandez Juncos

CANAL SAN ANTONIO CONDADO LAGOON

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

Alternative 3

Alternative 2

Kanaan Consulting US, Inc. 721 Main Street, Suite 304 Waltham, MA 02451 www.kcus.org 1

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


comparison of vehicular movements Alternative – 2 (to Old San Juan via F.J.) FROM PR-1 (Munoz Rivera Expressway) TO Ave. Fernandez Juncos

New Roads Improvements 2-lanes

Demolish Conc. Parapet

Alternative 2 Refined

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


comparison of vehicular movements FROM PR-1 (Munoz Rivera Expressway) TO Munoz Rivera on Isleta

CANAL SAN ANTONIO CONDADO LAGOON

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

Alternative 3

Alternative 2

Kanaan Consulting US, Inc. 721 Main Street, Suite 304 Waltham, MA 02451 www.kcus.org 1

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


comparison of vehicular movements FROM Ponce de Leon TO Baldorioty Boulevard

CANAL SAN ANTONIO CONDADO LAGOON

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

Alternative 3

Alternative 2

Kanaan Consulting US, Inc. 721 Main Street, Suite 304 Waltham, MA 02451 www.kcus.org 1

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


comparison of vehicular movements

Alternative – 2 (to Convention Center)

FROM Ponce de Leon TO Baldorioty Boulevard

New Roads Improvements 2-lanes

Demolish Conc. Parapet

Alternative 2 Refined

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


comparison of vehicular movements FROM Dr. Ashford Ave (Dos Hermanos Bridge) to PR-26 (Baldorioty Expressway)

CANAL SAN ANTONIO CONDADO LAGOON

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

Alternative 3

Alternative 2

Kanaan Consulting US, Inc. 721 Main Street, Suite 304 Waltham, MA 02451 www.kcus.org 1

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


comparison of vehicular movements FROM Dr. Ashford Ave (Dos Hermanos Bridge) to PR-26 (Baldorioty Expressway)

CANAL SAN ANTONIO CONDADO LAGOON

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

Alternative 3

Alternative 2

Kanaan Consulting US, Inc. 721 Main Street, Suite 304 Waltham, MA 02451 www.kcus.org 1

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


comparison of vehicular movements FROM Baldorioty Boulevard to Ave. Fernandez Juncos

CANAL SAN ANTONIO CONDADO LAGOON

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

Alternative 3

Alternative 2

Kanaan Consulting US, Inc. 721 Main Street, Suite 304 Waltham, MA 02451 www.kcus.org 1

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


comparison of vehicular movements FROM Ave. Fernandez Juncos TO Baldorioty Expressway

CANAL SAN ANTONIO CONDADO LAGOON

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

Alternative 3

Alternative 2

Kanaan Consulting US, Inc. 721 Main Street, Suite 304 Waltham, MA 02451 www.kcus.org 1

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


comparison of vehicular movements FROM Ave. Fernandez Juncos TO Dr. Ashford Ave (Dos Hermanos Bridge)

CANAL SAN ANTONIO CONDADO LAGOON

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

Alternative 3

Alternative 2

Kanaan Consulting US, Inc. 721 Main Street, Suite 304 Waltham, MA 02451 www.kcus.org 1

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


potential issues alternative 1

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


potential issues alternative 1A

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


potential issues alternative 2

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


potential issues alternative 2 refined

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


potential issues alternative 3

INTERSECTION-5 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

Kanaan Consulting US, Inc. 721 Main Street, Suite 304

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

Waltham, MA 02451

www.kcus.org 1

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


evaluation criteria •

Cost

• Consistency with LPA •

Consistency with Other Development/Urban Design Plans

Constructability and Schedule of Construction

Federal Actions

Level of Service and Traffic Flow and Improvements

Pedestrian Connection between the Isleta and Santurce

Changes in Vehicular Patterns

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


comparison of costs Tren Liviano Intersection 5 Cost Comparison Tren Liviano Intersection 5 Cost Comparison ITEM ITEM Alternative 1 - LRT Elevated Alternative 1 -Viaduct LRT Elevated Elevated LRT Elevated Elevated LRT Side Viaduct Platform Stations Elevated Side Platform Stations

QTY QTY

UNIT UNIT

117500 117500 2 2

SF SF EA EA

RATE RATE $ $$ $

400 400 4,000,000 4,000,000

TOTAL TOTAL

COST COST $ 47,000,000 $ $ 47,000,000 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000

Remarks Remarks Length: 4700 feet; width: 25 feet Length: width: 25Canal feet Stations Mid Park4700 and feet; San Antonio Mid Park and San Antonio Canal Stations

$ 55,000,000 $ 55,000,000

Alternative 1A - Partial LRT Elevated Alternative 1AViaduct - Partial LRT Elevated Elevated LRT 50000 Elevated 50000 Elevated LRT Side Viaduct Platform Stations 1 Elevated Platform Stations 1 RoadwaySide Re-construction 3889 Roadway Re-construction 3889

SF SF EA EA SY SY

$ $$ $$ $

400 400 4,000,000 4,000,000 180 180

TOTAL TOTAL

$ 20,000,000 $ $ 20,000,000 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000

Length: 2000 feet; width: 25 feet Length: width: 25Canal feet Stations Mid Park2000 and feet; San Antonio Mid Parkroad:600;new and San Antonio Canal Stations Shared connection to FJ:800 Shared road:600;new connection to FJ:800

$ 24,700,000 $ 24,700,000

Alternative 2 - Behar Original Concept Alternative 2 Stations - Behar Original Concept Side Platform 2 Side PlatformCanal Stations 2 San Antonio Bridge 10000 San 10000 New Antonio Bridge Canal Bridge 7500 New Bridge 7500 Roadway Re-construction 38000 Roadway Re-construction 38000

EA EA SF SF SF SF SY SY

$ $$ $ $ $ $ $

1,000,000 1,000,000 375 375 375 375 180 180

TOTAL TOTAL

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

2,000,000 2,000,000 3,750,000 3,750,000 2,812,500 2,812,500 6,840,000 6,840,000

Mid Park and San Antonio Canal Stations Mid Park400 andfeet; Sanwidth: Antonio Length: 25 Canal feet Stations Length: Length: 400 150 feet; feet; width: width: 25 50 feet feet Length: 150 feet;PR-1:200;PDL:200;SAC width: 50 feet Baldorioty:1800; Bdg:400;ES Bdg:400;PDL(N):1000;C5:500;FJ:1400 Baldorioty:1800; PR-1:200;PDL:200;SAC Bdg:400;ES Bdg:400;PDL(N):1000;C5:500;FJ:1400

$ 15,402,500 $ 15,402,500

Alternative 2 (refined) - Behar Refined Concept Alternative 2 (refined) Side Platform Stations - Behar Refined 2 Concept EA Side PlatformCanal Stations 2 EA San Antonio Bridge 10000 SF San 10000 SF New Antonio Bridge Canal Bridge 7500 SF New Bridge 7500 SF Roadway Re-construction 35333 SY Roadway Re-construction 35333 SY

$ $$ $ $ $ $ $

1,000,000 1,000,000 375 375 375 375 180 180

TOTAL TOTAL

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

2,000,000 2,000,000 3,750,000 3,750,000 2,812,500 2,812,500 6,360,000 6,360,000

Mid Park and San Antonio Canal Stations Mid Park400 andfeet; Sanwidth: Antonio Length: 25 Canal feet Stations Length: Length: 400 150 feet; feet; width: width: 25 50 feet feet Length: 150 feet;PR-1:200;PDL:200;SAC width: 50 feet Baldorioty:1800; Bdg:400;ES Bdg:400;PDL(N):1000;C5:500;FJ:800 Baldorioty:1800; PR-1:200;PDL:200;SAC Bdg:400;ES Bdg:400;PDL(N):1000;C5:500;FJ:800

$ 14,922,500 $ 14,922,500

Alternative 3 - At-grade Concept Alternative 3 Stations - At-grade Concept Side Platform Side PlatformCanal Stations San Antonio Bridge San AntonioExisting Canal Bridge Demolition Bridges DemolitionRe-construction Existing Bridges Roadway Roadway Re-construction

2 2 10000 10000 4 4 56644 56644

EA EA SF SF EA EA SY SY

TOTAL TOTAL

$ $$ $$ $$ $

1,000,000 1,000,000 375 375 200,000 200,000 180 180

$ 2,000,000 $ $ 2,000,000 3,750,000 $ 3,750,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 10,196,000 $ 10,196,000

Mid Park and San Antonio Canal Stations Mid Park400 andfeet; Sanwidth: Antonio Length: 25 Canal feet Stations Length: 400 feet;PR-1, width:PDL, 25 feet Over Baldorioty, and ramp to FJ Over Baldorioty, PR-1, PDL, and ramp to FJ Baldorioty:1800; PR-1:400;PDL:400;SAC Bdg:400;ES Bdg:400;PDL(N):1000;C5:500;FJ:1700;New:500;PDL:1100;Ash:300 Baldorioty:1800; PR-1:400;PDL:400;SAC Bdg:400;ES Bdg:400;PDL(N):1000;C5:500;FJ:1700;New:500;PDL:1100;Ash:300

$ 16,746,000 $ 16,746,000

*The above cost information includes only a few select items to allow a consistent comparison of the alternatives. It does not represent the total design construction cost of each alternative.

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


assessment Alternative 1

Alternative 1 A

Alternative 2

Alternative 2 Refined

Alternative 3

Evaluation Criteria Pros

Cost

Cons

Pros

$ 55 million

$24.7 million

Consistency with other development/ urban design plans

none

* Would require the alignment of the Tren Liviano to be elevated at Intersection-5

none

* Would require the alignment of the Tren Liviano to be elevated at Intersection-5

* Elevated Tren Liviano precludes location of the maintenance facility at the Convention Center; a new maintenance facility site would need to be identified and evaluated

none

|

Cons

$ 15.4 million

* Consistent with Tren Liviano LPA as incorporated in the Plan Vial

none

* Is not supportive of other development plans, including Walkable City

* Elevated ramp structures at Intersection 5 create visual barrier to the waterfront

* Fails to eliminate barriers, including visual barriers, to the waterfront

* Fails to eliminate barriers, including visual barriers, to the waterfront

* Does not support Mayor’s goal of an inviting entranceway to the Isleta and the capital city

* Does not support Mayor’s goal of an inviting entranceway to the Isleta and the capital city

KCUS

|

Pros

Cons

$14.9 million

* Is not supportive of other development plans, including Walkable City

none

* Does not support Mayor’s goal of an inviting entranceway to the Isleta and the capital city

* Precludes new Hyatt hotel development by Intersection-5; an agreement has been executed between the Convention Center District and the developer of this site

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

Pros

Pros

Cons

$ 16.7 million

* Inconsistent with Tren Liviano LPA as incorporated in the Plan Vial

* Inconsistent with Tren Liviano LPA as incorporated in the Plan Vial

Consistency with Final LPA (September 2011)

Cons

* Does not preclude private development plans in the corridor

* Consistent with Tren Liviano LPA as incorporated in the Plan Vial

none

* Consistent with Tren Liviano LPA as incorporated in the Plan Vial

none

* Reconstruction of Intersection 5 at grade fully supports other development/ urban design plans * Does not preclude private development plans in the corridor

none

* Does not preclude any private plans in the corridor

* Eliminates visual barriers to the waterfront

* Support’s Mayor’s goal of an inviting entranceway to the Isleta and the capital city

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


assessment Alternative 1

Alternative 1 A

Alternative 2

Alternative 2 Refined

Alternative 3

Evaluation Criteria Pros

Cons

Pros

Cons

Pros

* The vertical grade of the LRT to go from at-grade at Intersection 5 to elevated section north of the bridge may violate design criteria

Constructability and schedule of construction

* Does not involve change to existing roadways and Intersection 5

* Will require coordination with FAA to ensure elevated structure does not impinge into airspace

Federal Actions

Level of service and traffic flow and improvements

* Will be extremely challenging in * Does not involve * Construction of the constructing the constructing an elevated sections will elevated viaduct while elevated section be challenging over maintaining traffic through Intersection 5 existing roadway through Intersection 5

* Retains existing capacity on Isleta evacuation route

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

* Traffic will operate at unacceptable levels of service during the peak periods

* May require coordination with FAA to ensure elevated structure does not impinge into airspace

* Retains existing capacity on Isleta evacuation route

* Traffic will operate at unacceptable levels of service during the peak periods

* Traffic will operate at acceptable levels of service at the proposed at-grade intersection at PR-1/ PR-26

* Retains existing capacity on Isleta evacuation route

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

Cons

Pros

Cons

Pros

Cons

* Conversion of existing one-way bridges to two-way operations provide greater flexibility in detouring traffic for demolition & construction

* Will require temporary detour of traffic exiting the Isleta to allow demolition of existing frames (bridges)

* Will require a temporary detour of the traffic exiting the Isleta to allow construction of the new Concrete Frame

* Will require a temporary detour of the traffic exiting the Isleta to allow construction of the new Concrete Frame

* May impact the Existing Frame 1 due to close proximity of the new Concrete Frame

* May impact the Existing Frame 1 due to close proximity of the new Concrete Frame

* Detour of traffic from Isleta destined to PR-26 will be most challenging

* Detour of traffic from Isleta destined to PR-26 will be most challenging

* Will require coordination with PRHTA and FHWA for temporary removal of ramp structures

* Will require coordination with PRHTA and FHWA for temporary removal of ramp structures

* Will require extension coordination with PRHTA and FHWA for removal and reconstruction at grade of existing ramp structures

* May trigger NEPA, requiring potentially a CE or EA

* May trigger NEPA, requiring potentially a CE or EA

* Likely to trigger NEPA, requiring a federal EA or EIS

* Traffic will operate * Traffic will not * Traffic will not at acceptable levels operate acceptably operate acceptably of service at the at the intersection at the intersection * Will require proper proposed at-grade of Ponce de Leon at intersection at PR-1/ of Ponce de Leon at signing, traffic signal * All at-grade Calle 5 unless the Calle 5 unless the coordination and PR-26 intersections will Transit Signal Priority number of lanes going number of lanes going operate at acceptable to achieve optimal towards Old San Juan towards Old San Juan levels of service is increase from the is increase from the traffic flow through * Retains existing currently proposed currently proposed Intersection 5 capacity on Isleta 1 to 3 lanes at the 2 to 3 lanes at the evacuation route intersection intersection

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


assessment Alternative 1

Alternative 1 A

Alternative 2

Alternative 2 Refined

Alternative 3

Evaluation Criteria Pros

Cons

none

* The current configuration of Intersection-5 presents a dangerous pedestrian realm marked by the visual and physical obstacles of the ramps, insufficient pedestrian crossings, and high speed vehicular flow.

* Existing vehicular travel patterns are retained

* Traffic from PR-26 & Ponce de Leon in Santurce need to enter the Isleta, make a U turn, and immediately exit the Isleta to access the Convention Center District

Pedestrian connection between the Isleta and Santurce

Changes to Vehicular Travel Patterns

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Pros

Cons

None

* The alterative does little to improve the current configuration of Intersection-5, which presents a dangerous pedestrian realm marked by the visual and physical obstacles of the ramps, insufficient pedestrian crossings and high speed vehicular flow.

* Existing vehicular travel patterns are retained

Pros

Cons

None

* The alterative does little to improve the current configuration of Intersection-5, which presents a dangerous pedestrian realm marked by the visual and physical obstacles of the ramps, insufficient pedestrian crossings and high speed vehicular flow.

Pros

None

* Existing ramp from Estevez Bridge to Ave. * Traffic from PR-26 Fernandez Juncos & Ponce de Leon in * Major vehicular travel * Major vehicular travel is removed. This will movements such as Santurce need to enter movements such as require traffic from the Isleta, make a U Isleta to PR-1 and Isleta to PR-1 and PR-1 and Ponce de turn, and immediately Isleta to PR-26 are Isleta to PR-26 are Leon (Santurce) to exit the Isleta to retained with existing retained with existing be diverted to a twoaccess the Convention one-way bridges one-way bridges way portion of Ponce Center District de Leon (Isleta) and Calle 5

Cambridge Systematics

Cons

Pros

* The alternative * The alterative does transforms little to improve the Intersection-5 into current configuration a memorable and of Intersection-5, iconic gateway into which presents a the Isleta, marked by dangerous pedestrian a pedestrian-friendly realm marked by the environment, and visual and physical abundant visual obstacles of the ramps, connections to the insufficient pedestrian Convention Center, crossings and high Santurce and the speed vehicular flow. Isleta.

Cons

none

* Existing ramp from Estevez Bridge to Ave. Fernandez Juncos is removed. This will require traffic from * All existing vehicular * The existing one-way PR-1 and Ponce de travel patterns are bridges are converted Leon (Santurce) to retained into two-way bridges be diverted to a twoway portion of Ponce de Leon (Isleta) and Calle 5

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


recommendation

Alternative 1 should be disregarded due to • high cost • implication on plan development (Hyatt development and Maintenance Facility) • inability to serve the Convention Center District • extensive visual barrier to the waterfront • higher complexity of construction over existing grade-separated interchange • requires coordination with FAA

Alternative 1A is a functional alternative, but not recommended due to: • high cost • extensive visual barrier to the waterfront • poor pedestrian realm and connection between the Isleta and Santurce • may require coordination with FAA Alternative 2 is a functional alternative, but not recommended due to: • many cumbersome traffic movements • visual barrier to the waterfront • longer duration of disruption to traffic due to construction Alternative 2 refined is a functional alternative, but not recommended due to: • unsafe weaving traffic movements over Estévez bridge • some cumbersome traffic movements • visual barrier to the waterfront • longer duration of disruption to traffic due to construction Alternative 3 is the recommended alternative due to: • improvement to traffic movements • enhanced visual connections • pedestrian-friendly public realm with high connectivity • less disruption to traffic due to construction Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

|

KCUS

|

Cambridge Systematics

APPENDIX 1.3-1 INTERSECTION-5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES


Appendixes Vol. 1

Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 1.4

Locally Preferred Alternative and Station Typologies

Municipality of San Juan


LIGHT RAIL ALIGMENT Locally Preferred Alternative

de Avenida Ponce

Leon

CAPITOLIO

PIER 3 TERMINUS

1

SAN AGUSTIN WEST Calle del Tren

Tren Liviano Light-Rail Alignment (Phase 1: 3.55 miles)

SAN AGUSTIN EAST

2 3

4

Avenida Fe

Light-Rail Terminus

rnande

z Junc

MID PARK

os

5 CANAL SAN ANTONIO CONDADO LAGOON

6 CONVENTION CENTER

7

P-2

LEGEND

CANAL SAN ANTONIO

P-1 Exp o

CONVENTION CENTER

P-3

1/ 5- 4-m m il in e ut ra e diu wa s lk

AT GRADE

Av en id

8

Ca

lle

9

La

Tren Liviano Light-Rail Alignment (Phase 2: 3.22 miles)

Ex po Lu is

SAN JUAN BAY

Length of Alignment: 5.3 miles

Av en ida

Fe rn

an

sP alm

as

Tren Liviano Tren Urbano

Po n

PARADA 18

Maintenance Facility [276,000 sf] (with 2-story Park and Ride Facility above it)

STATION

a

ce

de

de

ty d eC

astr o

Le on

zJ un c

SANTURCE os CENTRO

10 Mu ñe

z Ri

SAN MATEO vera

11

PARK AND RIDE FACILITIES Park and Ride Facilities P1

No. of floors

Gross Area (sf)

Total parking spaces

4

252,000

1100

P2

3

216,000

600

P3

2

504,000

1,400

P4

4

726,700

2,000

SAGRADO CORAZÓN TERMINUS

P-4

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION OCTOBER 24, 2011

Location Map Meters

0

375

750

Appendix 1.4-1

Light-Rail Terminus

1500 1 : 50,000

TREN LIVIANO

12

TRE NU

5,100

PR-2 2

No. of Parking Spaces: 5,100

TOTAL

°

PR -2

No. of Stations: 12

RBA NO

TRANSIT LINE

Bald orio

EL GANDUL

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. SUBCONSULTANT


STATION TYPOLOGY 1

TYPICAL STATION

TYPE A: SIDE PLATFORM STATION

STATION PLANS

Side Platform - Plan Tracks

Ticket Vending Machine

Benches

Surveillance Camera

Tactile Way

210’ - 0”

9’ - 0”

Meters

0

2.5

5

10

Appendix 1.4-2

Handicap Accessible Crossing

System Map & GPS

Emergency Phone

Traffic Lanes

TREN LIVIANO

°

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO 0

Feet

40 20 10 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

TREN CONSULTANT

LIVIANO ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

SANTURCE CENTRO

CLIENT:

MUNICIPIO DE SAN JUAN, P.R. CONSULTANT:

© Antonio Di Mambro + Associates, Inc.


STATION TYPOLOGY 1 Side Platform - Section

Meters

0

1

2

4

Appendix 1.4-3

TREN LIVIANO MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.


STATION TYPOLOGY 1 Side Platform - Perspective

Appendix 1.4-4

TREN LIVIANO MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

© Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.


STATION TYPOLOGY 2 Pier 3 Terminus – Plan

Location Map

Appendix 1.4-5

TREN LIVIANO MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.


STATION TYPOLOGY 2 Pier 3 Terminus – Perspective

Existing Conditions

Location Map

Appendix 1.4-6

TREN LIVIANO MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

© Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.


Appendixes Vol. 1

Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 4.1

Observed Floral and Faunal Species

Municipality of San Juan


Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 4.1-1 Observed Floral Species:

Common Name Trees

Scientific Name

White Mangrove Red Mangrove Portia Tree Rubber Tree Coconut Palm Rainbow Eucalyptus Plomillo Paperbark tree Royal Poinciana Mango sapodilla Schefflera

Roystonea borinquena Sabal palmetto Ficus sp. Tecoma stans Casuarina equisitifolia Terminalia catappa Bursera simaruba Callistemon rigidis Ficus benghalensis Lagerstroemia speciosa Spathodea campanulata Albizia procera Avicennia germinans Lagununclularia racemosa Rhiophora mangle Thespesia populnea Ficus elastica Cocos nucifera Eucalyptus deglupta Zuelania guidonia Melaleuca quinqunervia Delonix regia Mangifera indica Manilkara zapota Schefflera spp.

Shrubs Sea Grape Hibiscus Bougainvillea Jungle geranium Crown of Thorns Black mimosa

Coccoluba uvifera Hibiscus sp. Bougainvillea spp. Ixora ccoinea Euphorbia splendens Mimosa pigra

Plants/Vines Morning Glory Castor Bean Leatherfern Toothed Midsorous Fern Dumbcane Philodendron Croton plant Pothos vine Kleberg bluestem

Ipomea fistulosa Ricinis communis Acrostichum sp. Blechnum serratulatum Diffenbachia seguine Philodendron spp. Cadiaeum spp Epipremnum spp. Dicanthelium annulatum

Royal Palm Cabbage Palm Ficus Yellow Elder Australian Pine Indian Almond Gumbo Limbo Bottlebrush Banyan Crepe Myrtle African Tulip Tree Tall Albizia Black Mangrove

Municipality of San Juan


Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 4.1-2 Observed Floral Species:

Common Name

Scientific Name

Avian banaquits black-faced grassquits zenaida doves rock dove greater Antillean grackle house sparrow White-winged dove Puerto Rican woodpecker great egrets red-legged thrush

Coereba flaveola Tiaris bicolor Zenadia aurita Columba livia Quiscalus niger Zenaida asiatica Passer domesticus Melanerpes portoricensis Ardea albaI Turdeus plumbeus

canary-winged parakeet common moorhen cattle egret green heron tri-colored heron

Brotogeris versicolurus Gallinula chloropus Bulbucus ibis Butorides virescens Egretta tricolor

great blue heron belted kingfisher red-tailed hawk green mango hummingbird black-crowned night heron carribean swallow

Ardea herodias Megaceryle alcyon Buteo jamaicensis Anthracothorax viridis Nycticorax nycticorax

Reptile and Amphibians Brown anoles Coquis Green iguanas

Anolis sagrei Eleutherodactylus spp. Iguana iguana

Puerto Rican ground lizard

Ameiva exsul

Mammals Mongoose

Herpestes spp

Municipality of San Juan


Appendixes Vol. 1

Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 4.2-1

Surficial Geology

Municipality of San Juan


GEOLOGY Surficial Geology Figure 4.2-1, Map 1 of 2 Legend Project Alignment af

Artificial Fill (Holocene)

Qb

Beach Deposits (Holocene)

Qss

Silica Sand (Holocene)

Qe

Eolianite (Holocene and Pleistocene) Older Alluvial Deposits (Pleistocene and Pliocene)

QTt

G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Existing_conditions_report\Revised_alignment\geology1.mxd

Basemap: Geologic Map of the San Juan Quadrangle, Puerto Rico Source: USGS, 1977

ATLANTIC OCEAN

Old San Juan

TR E

SAN JUAN BAY

CATAテ前

NL I VI

AN

O

Sagrado Corazテウn

SAN JUAN

GUAYANABO

Location Map Meters

0

Appendix 4.2-1

150

300

600

1 : 20,000

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT


GEOLOGY Surficial Geology Figure 4.2-1, Map 2 of 2 Legend Project Alignment af

Artificial Fill (Holocene)

Qb

Beach Deposits (Holocene)

Qss

Silica Sand (Holocene)

Qe

Eolianite (Holocene and Pleistocene) Older Alluvial Deposits (Pleistocene and Pliocene)

QTt

G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Existing_conditions_report\Revised_alignment\geology2.mxd

Basemap: Geologic Map of the San Juan Quadrangle, Puerto Rico Source: USGS, 1977

ATLANTIC OCEAN

Old San Juan

TR E

SAN JUAN BAY

CATAテ前

NL I VI

AN

O

Sagrado Corazテウn

SAN JUAN

GUAYANABO

Location Map Meters

0

Appendix 4.2-2

150

300

600

1 : 20,000

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT


Appendixes Vol. 1

Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 4.3-1

National Inventory Wetlands

Municipality of San Juan


WETLANDS National Inventory Wetlands Map 1 of 2 Legend Project Alignment Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Estuarine and Marine Deepwater

G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Existing_conditions_report\Revised_alignment\wetlands1.mxd

Basemap: 2007 Imagery, USACE

ATLANTIC OCEAN

Old San Juan

TR E

SAN JUAN BAY

CATAテ前

NL I VI

AN

O

Sagrado Corazテウn

SAN JUAN

GUAYANABO

Location Map Meters

0

Appendix 4.3-1

150

300

600

1 : 20,000

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT


WETLANDS National Wetlands Inventory Map 2 of 2 Legend Project Alignment Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Estuarine and Marine Deepwater

G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Existing_conditions_report\Revised_alignment\wetlands2.mxd

Basemap: 2007 Imagery, USACE

ATLANTIC OCEAN

Old San Juan

TR E

SAN JUAN BAY

CATAテ前

NL I VI

AN

O

Sagrado Corazテウn

SAN JUAN

GUAYANABO

Location Map Meters

0

Appendix 4.3-2

150

300

600

1 : 20,000

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT


Appendixes Vol. 1

Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 4.4

Context Diagram and Land Uses for Isleta and Santurce

Municipality of San Juan


SITE ANALYSIS Context Diagram: Isleta and Santurce

Atlantic Ocean

San Felipe del Morro Castle San Cristóbal Castle La Perla Capitolio

Institutional / Cultural

Old San Juan Commercial Harbor

San Agustin

Thrid Millenium Park Muñoz Rivera Park

Hospitality Hub

Obsolete Port

Puntilla

San Antonio Canal Condado Lagoon

Isla Grande Airport

Obsolete Port

R

Condado

Convention District

Miramar Historic District

Obsolete Port San Juan Bay

Minillas

Gandul Trastalleres

R

Figueroa Hipódromo San Juan Central Park

°

Parada 23

Santurce Park

Sagrado Corazón

Location Map Meters

0

375

750

1500

Appendix 4.4-1

TREN LIVIANO

Barrio Obrero

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT:

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

Hato Rey


SITE ANALYSIS Building Uses: Isleta SUMMARY • Government facilities in Puntilla • Commercial and mixed-use development along the harbor • Public housing along Calle del Tren • Run-down residential neighborhood Ca

lle

Teatro Tapia Antiguo Casino

de

lM

Calle San Migue

or ro

Bus Terminal

l

Capitolio

o mp Ca El

garay tian s a b e S

rr C

co

is Franc

za

r tale la Fo lle de

Calle

Ca

Sa n A

gustin

US Customs Office

Aveni da Fe rnande

Departamento de Hacienda New Mixed-Use Residential Tower

da

Pon ce

de

n

z Juncos

Public Housing Port Facilities El Falansterio Public Housing

Pier 10 Arena

Public Housing

CANAL SAN ANTONIO

U.S. Corp of Engineers

hford tor As a Doc Avenid

Bomberos Department of Natural Resources

US Coast Guard

CONDADO LAGOON

Marina

Sizzler Restaurant

rande o de Isla G Aeropuert Dept. of Homeland Security

Leo

Asamblea Legislativa Salvation Army

El Arsenal de la Marina

Ave ni

Calle del Tren

Calle Concepcion de Gracia

Hotel Shereton Jose Julian Acosta School

Dept. of Education

Avenida Munoz Rivera

Po Covadonga

o

an alle S

n Just de S a

o

Courthouse

Public Archives Municipal Electrical Department

Run Down Neighborhood of San Agustin

Calle

l de

M o

n de Sa

Residential Tower

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico Instituto Oftalmico de Puerto Rico

Calle No rza Calle

on Calle San Agustin

Medical Arts Building

Casa Olympica

ergh Calle Linb

Ave ni

da

Po nce

de L

eo n

LEGEND

°

Location Map Feet

0

Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

800

Ave ni

da

TREN LIVIANO

Fer n

and

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO ez

Jun c

os

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Industrial

CONSULTANT:

Institutional

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

Religious Medical Parking Structure Abandoned

1600

Appendix 4.4-2

Fort/ Historic Structures Government buildings

400


aA

CANAL SAN ANTONIO

Dept. of Justice

SITE ANALYSIS

Department de Turismo

Av en id

CONDADO LAGOON

sh fo

Museum of Contemperary Art

Building Uses: Santurce

Dept. of Agriculture

rd Comision de Investigacion

Municipal Building

College Building

Conservatorio Academia Municipal Building Santa Monica

dbergh Calle Lin

Autoridad de Los Puertos

Dept. of Family & Social Services

Pediatric Center

SUMMARY

School Centro de Bellas Artes

Department of Hacienda

• Commercial and mixed-use developments along Avenida Ponce

Department of Telecomunications Autoridad de Energia Electrica

PR Army National Guard

Ave nid

Graduada Puiz Belvis

Cal le H oar e

Calle 26

Ingenieria Planificacion

de Leon aM

agd a

len a

/Expo

Bald

oriot

y de

Avenida

• Mostly residential development along Ashford

Avenida Fernandez Juncos

Calle Luc hetti

Cas tr

• Edges of run-down residential

o

neighborhoods along Calle Las Palmas and Expo Luis Munoz Rivera

Calle Loiz a

dd

OGP I.T. Govt.

H. To

Deptartment of Education

Ju nc

/Av enid aR

Centro Mas Salud

de z

Asociacion Medicina de PR

os

de

Le on

C al le 2

School

Po nc e

Francisco Hernandez School Barbosa School

Avenida Edu ardo Conde

Cal le 1 /Ex p

School

22

New Shereton Hotel

ob er t o

School

na n

Calle 26

oL

uis M

uñe z

Mejoras Antiguo Centro Ciegos Adultos

Calle

Convention Center

Av en ida

Av en

Av en ida Fe r

San Juan Gas

ida de D

iego

Call e

C er

ra

Ca lle

Vi lla mi

l

Negociado Maritimo

Riv era

Day Surgery Center

Instituto Loaiza Cordero

Doctor’s Center

Autoridad de Tierra

Ca ll

°

e1

LEGEND Fort/ Historic Structures Government buildings

Avenida Borinquen Cerveceria Corona Inc.

Medical Parking Structure Abandoned

800

1600

Appendix 4.4-3

TREN LIVIANO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Matienzo Cintron

Mixed-Use Dieg o

Parque de Santurce

E xp o de

Religious

400

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

Commercial

Institutional

Feet

0

Bomberos

Residential

Industrial

Location Map

CONSULTANT:

Louis Munoz Rivera Escuela Parque de San Juan Housing

YMCA Autoridad Carreteras Transportacion Sangrado Corazon Tren Urbano Station

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.


Appendixes Vol. 1

Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 4.5-1

FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer

Municipality of San Juan


FLOODPLAIN FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer, Map 1 of 2 Legend Project Alignment FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Zone A Zone AE D Zone VE

G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Existing_conditions_report\Revised_alignment\fema1.mxd

Basemap: 2007 Imagery, USACE

ATLANTIC OCEAN

Old San Juan

TR E

SAN JUAN BAY

CATAテ前

NL I VI

AN

O

Sagrado Corazテウn

SAN JUAN

GUAYANABO

Location Map Meters

0

Appendix 4.5-1

150

300

600

1 : 20,000

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT


FLOODPLAIN FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer, Map 1 of 2 Legend Project Alignment

FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Zone A Zone AE D Zone VE

G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Existing_conditions_report\Revised_alignment\fema2.mxd

Basemap: 2007 Imagery, USACE

ATLANTIC OCEAN

Old San Juan

TR E

SAN JUAN BAY

CATAテ前

NL I VI

AN

O

Sagrado Corazテウn

SAN JUAN

GUAYANABO

Location Map Meters

0

Appendix 4.5-2

150

300

600

1 : 20,000

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT


Appendixes Vol. 1

Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 4.10

Noise Measurement Locations

Municipality of San Juan


G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_locations_index_final.mxd

Legend

Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential

Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial 2 1

1

3

Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet

4

2

5

3

Project Alignment

6 7 8

4

9

11 10

Map Tiles 12

5

13 14

Scale

15

6

22

1:18,000

375 750

1,500 Feet

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

7 18

0

16

21 20

8 1719

23

24

9

25 26

10 27 11

28 29

12

31 30

33

32

13

34

35 36

14

38

37

15

39

40

Tren Liviano

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-1

Noise Monitoring Locations, Index Map


G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

Call l onel e Od

Calle

e de Avenida Juan Ponc

lla Capi

Calle Fortaleza

ale Fort Calle

Leon

za

C o de Pase

Jose Julian Acosta j Gam Calle baro

r Blv

ray ga a rz No

a ong ovad

2

lle Ca

n

ing

Ca lle

1

io

Hard

lle Ca

o

t ecin

m Co

c er

Calle

eR Call

ell on Od

a Tetu Calle

Reina de Castilla Sheraton Old San Juan Hotel

Br

3

au mb au gh

Paseo Concepcion de

o Pase

Gr n de pcio e c n Co

acia

Gracia

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Track Alignment Rail Alignment Project Envelope Parcel Boundary Scale

0

1:1,200 25 50

100 Feet

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

Tren Liviano

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 1 of 15


G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

ivera Mu単oz R Avenida

Library

4

Avenida Juan

Ponce de Le

on

Avenida Fernandez Juncos

rac de G

s

Pa se oC

Calle Gen Contrera

ia

Capitolo Plaza

on ce pc ion

Calle del Muelle

5

Calle Pershing

Paseo de Covadonga

Aven ida F ernan dez J unco s

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Track Alignment Rail Alignment Project Envelope Parcel Boundary Scale

0

1:1,200 25 50

100 Feet

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

Tren Liviano

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 2 of 15


errete

aga

Cal le E ste v

es

G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

Calle

Capt B

Paseo de Covadonga

Avenida

Church

Juan Pon ce de Le

6 Calle S

an Agu s

nida Fern a

Coco nut P alm

ndez J

unco s

Calle V

Ave

tin

aldes

Calle

on

Fe rn an de z

Ju nc os

Calle Sa n Andre

Av en ida

s

Calle del Tren

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Track Alignment Rail Alignment Project Envelope Parcel Boundary Scale

0

1:1,200 25 50

100 Feet

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

Tren Liviano

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 3 of 15


a Juan

Ponce

de Leo n

Ferna ndez Calle

an Jua n

Matia s

tin

Calle S

Calle T adeo R

ivera

an Agu s

Calle

Calle S

Bautista

Ledes m

a

Avenid

Calle Lugo Vi単as

G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

Atlantis

11

San Agustin

7 8

Calle del Tren

10

Puerta de Tierra

Calle Ta

deo Riv e

Calle M atias L edesm

ra

a

Avenida Fernandez Juncos

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Track Alignment Rail Alignment Project Envelope Parcel Boundary Calle Fe

9

rnandez

San Antonio

Scale

0

1:1,200 25 50

100 Feet

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

Tren Liviano

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 4 of 15


ow

er

G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

Luis Mu単oz Rivera Park

Cal le R

am on P

Biblioteca Nacional

13

12

nida Jua n

Pon ce d

e Le

on

Calle

3

Ave

5

rnand ez Ju ncos

Calle

Aven ida Fe

Calle

3

Cal le d el T

ren

14

Millenium

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Track Alignment Rail Alignment Project Envelope Parcel Boundary Scale

0

1:1,200 25 50

100 Feet

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

Tren Liviano

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 5 of 15


G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

Pon ce d

e Le

on

Ri ve ra

nida Jua n

Av en id a

Mu 単o z

Ave

Calle

15 Caribe Plaza

Cal le d el T

ren

14

Ca lle La s

Pa lm e ra s

Millenium

Ave

nid a

Fer nan dez

Jun cos

Avenid a Mu単o a

e de

os unc

n Leo

zJ nde

c Pon

a Fern nida

n Jua nida

z River

Ave

Ave

Tren Liviano

Rosa les

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Track Alignment Rail Alignment Project Envelope Parcel Boundary Scale

0

1:1,200 25 50

100 Feet

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 6 of 15


G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

Calle

inal Marg

dbergh Calle Lin

Waterview Mansions

Ave

nid a

Fer nan dez J

Calle

unc os

Mira m

ar

Thomas Blvr Saint

16

Jua n

Po

nce

de

Leo n

Arecib Calle

a

rS Blv

Tren Liviano

u単oz Rivera

Calle Vil la Verde

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Ca lle Mc Track Alignment Kin ley Rail Alignment Project Envelope Parcel Boundary

#601 Elliot Place

Expo Luis M

uci aL ant

mpo Calle Oli

Calle In depend ence

Ca lle Mir am a

r

ain tT ho m

Billia n

Blv rS

Calle

Expo

as

Luis M

u単oz

Rivera

o

Av eni da

21 Ca lle Jo se M

Scale art i

0

1:1,200 25 50

100 Feet

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 7 of 15


G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

Call Rivera

20

Expo Luis Mu単o z

r

Ca lle

Ro os ev elt

Calle

Ca lle C

ent r

al

Ca lle Mir am a

Blv rS

ain tT ho m

as

nce

Expo Luis M u単oz Rivera

e end

Cal le V illa Ver de

dep e In

18

Woods behind #658 Calle Miramar

Ente

Av eni da

Jun cos

r

e rpris ohn aint J Blvr S

Fer nan dez

Av eni da

Mir am a

Vistas de San Juan

17

22

l na gi

Tren Liviano

s

ar M

lle Ca

re flo i ra M

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Ca lle Station Train Lo sN a ra Track Alignment njo Rail Alignment s Project Envelope Parcel Boundary lle Ca

Casa de Ni単os Manuel Fernandez Juncos

#704 Avenida Miramar

Scale

0

1:1,200 25 50

Ca lle Ma llo rc a

#642 Calle Marginal

ent r

al

f Re

Ca lle C

lle Ca

19

io ug

100 Feet

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 8 of 15


Ca lle C

Ro os ev elt

Ca lle Jos e

Ma rti

Cal le U

nio n

Ca lle

on cor dia

G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

#668 Calle Estado

24

s

Parking lot

Aven ida F erna

ndez Junc os

oar e

a ra njo

Cal le H

Lo sN

Lu is M

u単 oz R

Tren Liviano

ive

Ca lle ra

La s

Pa lm as

onc ord ia Cal le C

Cal le l aP

Ex po

Cal le E

sta d

o

az

Cal le U

Cal le H

nio n

Ca lle

25

ern and e

23

z

#662 Calle Concordilla

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Track Alignment Rail Alignment Project Envelope Parcel Boundary Scale

0

1:1,200 25 50

100 Feet

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 9 of 15


G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

uro r

Mon serra te

Ca lle E

rne

Calle

sto

Ce

rra

Ca lle

Call Cal le H

oar e

26 Ca lle A

Nava s

Ce rra

e Su au

Calle

a

Rafael Cordero

e de

l Ca

rm e n

Call

e Sa n Ju an

Call

Av en ida

Academia Santa Monica

Fe rna nd ez

Ju nc os

27

Tren Liviano

e rra

oa

a

Scale

0

1:1,200 25 50

tor F igue r

uro r

100 Feet

e Vic

e El isa C

Cal le A

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

Call

Call

Cal le L lov e

ras

Ca lle Lea ltad

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Track Alignment Rail Alignment Project Envelope Parcel Boundary

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 10 of 15


Ca lle

Co nd ad o

G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

Ca

rm

en

Ju an

Po

nc e

oa

de l

Av en id a

Fi gu er

de

Le on

Ca lle

Du ffa ut

Ca lle

Ca lle

Ca lle

De lic ias

Ro be rto

H

To dd

Ca lle

Fe r

na nd ez

Ju nc os

La br a

Av en id a

Ca lle

Ca lle

Ge or

ge t

ti

28 Ca lle

To rre

sd el aV

eg a

Co rc h ad o

Instituto Loaza Cordero

0

1:1,200 25 50

100 Feet

Ca lle

Scale

Hi po dr o

m o

Ca lle

Ca ll

e Am Legend er ic Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential o Sa Zone II Monitoring la Location - Commercial s Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Track Alignment Rail Alignment Project Envelope Parcel Boundary

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

Tren Liviano

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 11 of 15


G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

mer ic

oS

alas

Ca lle A

sia

Centro Pediatrico Santurce

Ju nc os

sia

31

ic a

rM Rafa el

e

Scale

0

1:1,200 25 50

rqu

San

100 Feet

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

Tren Liviano

Pa

a

de l

me ric

ro

anc h Calle

e Ca rri o nM adu

ro Pa lm as

Cal le A

fa el

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Track Alignment Rail Alignment Project Envelope Parcel Boundary

e Ca rri o nM adu

La s

Ra

Santurce Guest House & Restaurant

Call

Ca lle

Sa n

Cal le S

Ca lle

Call

Pa vi ern an de z Ma nu el F Dr

ez

a

elav al

Ca lle

me ric

Expo de Die go

Expo de Die go

Aven ida B

Cal le A

30

Cal le B

Ca lle

Ca lle

na nd ez

Cal le A

Ca lle D

Am er

Fe r

ern and ez

ia

anu el F

Fe r

Av en id a

La f

ay et te

Ca lle

Pav i

29

Ca lle

Ca lle

Ma nu el

#1420 Calle Lafayette/Calle Feria

ia

Dr

Fe r

Ca lle

Ca lle

Ali an za

Fe rn

an de z

Pa vi

Ca lle

Llo ve ras

Cal le A

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 12 of 15

#6


G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

30

Av en id a

Ju an

Po

nc e

de

Le on

#654 Calle Santa Ana

Sa ld an a

Ca lle

de l

Pa r

qu e

Santurce Guest House & Restaurant

Ca lle

Sa nta

An a

Ca lle

33

Av eni da

Jun cos

y

uev a

lgo D Jo se Fid a

les nge

#725 Calle del Parque

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Track Alignment Rail Alignment Project Envelope Escuela Graduada Parcel Boundary Luis Mu単oz-Rivera

35

org e

34

Cal le M ach in

Tren Liviano

Cal le L os A

#710 Calle Bolivar

Sa nJ

Ca lle

Vi ct

Scale

or ia

0

1:1,200 25 50

100 Feet

Ca lle

Cal le N

32

e Bo livar

fael

Call

e Sa n Ra

Cal le d el P a rq ue

Call

Ca lle

Call

eC

Cal le V

icto r

arri on M adu

Lop ez

ro

iaz

Cal le F inla

Fer nan dez

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 13 of 15


G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

Jo se Sa n

Sa nJ

Call

a Rier

38 Vi ct

or ia

#a un l a

de on Le

#708 Calle Mayol

t Ca

37

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Track Alignment Rail Alignment Project Envelope Parcel Boundary

Tren Liviano

Luis M

u単oz

Rivera

Rivera

Scale

0

1:1,200 25 50

o

u単oz

Pe dr

Expo

Luis M

Ca lle

Expo

de

Ca st

l

ol

e nc

ra

Ca lle

lle Ca

ay M

Po

Co

Cal le M u rg ia

H

lle Ca

Calle M argina

#608 Calle Mayol

an Ju

Jo se

Ju nc os

a id en Av

Ca lle

na nd ez

eJD

Jo se Sa n

Fe r

Ca lle

e Lo s An

#709 Calle San Jorge

Av en id a

Call

36

ro

eM ach in

gele s

Call

Ca lle

Ca lle

Escuela Graduada Luis Mu単oz-Rivera

org e

35

100 Feet

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 14 of 15


G:\Projects2\Puerto_Rico\2954_Tren_Liviano\Noise\noise_location_series_final.mxd

lle Ca

r Jo

n da lle Ca

a id en Av

"The City" Apts

r Fe ez nd na

lle Ca

s le sa o R

s le sa o R

39

os nc Ju

lle Ca

po Ex

r Ma

R oz u単

l na gi

M is Lu ive ra

C

le al

g Sa

do ra

r Co

on az

de

s su Je

Expo Luis lle Ca z Iri

e ra z Ri v Mu単o

ry ar

Equestrian Center

40

YMCA

Legend Zone I Monitoring Location - Residential Zone II Monitoring Location - Commercial Zone IV Monitoring Location - Quiet Train Station Track Alignment Rail Alignment Project Envelope Parcel Boundary Scale

0

1:1,200 25 50

100 Feet

Basemap: 2007 Orthoimagery, USACE

Tren Liviano

San Juan, Puerto Rico Figure 4.10-2

Noise Monitoring Locations, Map 15 of 15


Appendixes Vol. 1

Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 4.11

Photo Survey of the Tren Liviano Corridor

Municipality of San Juan


SITE ANALYSIS Photo Survey 1: Isleta Corridor Po Covadonga & Calle Concepcion de Gracia

1

2

3

5

4

Pr-25 Sp

ur

Calle e Odon

co

Po Covadonga

4

ruz

C Calle

Calle Tanca

leza For ta Calle

Pr-25

ll

rancis San F Calle

1

5 8

9

3

2

n Tetua Calle

10 6 7

Calle Concepcion de Gr acia

Location Map Feet

0

125

250

500

Appendix 4.11-1

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT:

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

6

7

8

9

10


SITE ANALYSIS Photo Survey 2: Isleta Corridor Calle del Tren & Calle San Agustin

2

3

5

4

Pr-25

Po Covadonga

Spur

tista

1

Juan Ba u

Pr-25

1 2

Calle S

Calle S an

Calle Pelay o

Calle V aldes

6 an Ag ustin

7

8

9 Calle del Tren

3

4

10

5

Calle S an Andre

s

Avenid a Ferna ndez J un

Calle M atias Le desma

cos

Location Map Feet

0

125

250

500

Appendix 4.11-2

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT:

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

6

7

8

9

10


SITE ANALYSIS Photo Survey 3: Isleta Corridor Calle del Tren & Avenida Fernandez Juncos

1

2

3

Ave ni

4 Calle del Tren

da Pon ce

de

Leo n

(Pr

5

4

-25 )

1

Call

Calle 5

eR

amo n

Pow er

7

2

5

9 10

Avenid a

Ferna n

dez Ju n

cos

8

3

6 Ashfo da Dr Aveni

rd

Location Map Feet

0

125

250

500

Appendix 4.11-3

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT:

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

6

7

8

9

10


SITE ANALYSIS Photo Survey 4: Canal San Antonio Bridge & Intersection-5

1

2

3

ida en v A

Dr

hfo As

4

5

rd

CONDADO LAGOON

5

1

y de oriot Bald n a Rom Expo

7 3

2

AL CAN

SAN

10

9

O ONI ANT

4

ro Cast

6

Avenida Ponce de Leon

Expo

8

M Luis

° °

Location Map Feet

uñoz

0

125

250

500

ra Rive

Appendix 4.11-4

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT:

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

6

7

8

9

10


SITE ANALYSIS Photo Survey 5: Convention Center

1

2

3

5

4

9 7 n

6

-1 PR

Calle Billia

5

8 4

dez

an Fern Ave

s

o Junc

Under Construction

db er g

h

1

e

u Majag

Blvd Santa Lucia

Calle

Ca

lle

Li n

Calle Enterpris

Bu lev ar New Hotel Building

St

Th om

as

a

Ca lle

Ma

bo

3

째째

Calle Guamani

2

Location Map Feet

0

125

250

500

Appendix 4.11-5

TREN LIVIANO

10

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT:

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

6

7

8

9

10


SITE ANALYSIS Photo Survey 6: Area South of Convention Center

3

Calle Lindbergh

1

10

5

4

2

5

Calle Caguax

4

6

8

7

9

3 Calle Guaraca

2

Calle Mazagua

1

Calle Guamani

째째

Location Map Feet

0

125

250

500

Appendix 4.11-6

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT:

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

6

7

8

9

10


SITE ANALYSIS Photo Survey 7: Santurce Corridor Avenida Fernandez Juncos

2

3

4

Calle Jose Mar ti

Calle Union

1

5

1 PR-

Calle Cerra

1

S va r Bule

2

3

4

5

8

6

9

Avenida Fernan dez

Juncos

10

7

o t Th

as

Calle Hoare

m

Expo Lu

is Muño

z Rivera

/ PR-1

°°

Location Map Feet

0

125

250

500

Appendix 4.11-7

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT:

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

6

7

8

9

10


SITE ANALYSIS Photo Survey 8: Santurce Corridor Avenida Fernandez Juncos

2

3

5

4

2

3

dez Juncos Avenida Fernan

4

5

6

7

8

Calle Hippo drom

o

H Calle

S Calle

oare

an an Ju

H Avenida Roberto

Todd

1

9

1

10

째째

Location Map Feet

0

125

250

500

Appendix 4.11-8

Calle Las Palmas

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT:

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

6

7

8

9

10


SITE ANALYSIS Photo Survey 9: Santurce Corridor Sagrado Corazón

1

2

3

Expo

5

4

Luis M uñoz R ivera

9

ida en Av r Fe na ez nd s co

n Ju

2

de Avenida Ponce

7

3

10

8 4

quen Avenida Borin

5

Leon

6

1

°

Location Map Feet

0

125

250

500

Appendix 4.11-9

TREN LIVIANO

MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO Feet

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONSULTANT:

Antonio Di Mambro, P.C.

6

7

8

9

10


Appendixes Vol. 1

Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 4.12-2 to 4.12-3

Historic and Archaeological Resources

Municipality of San Juan


Appendixes Vol. 1

Tren Liviano Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Ave Ponce De Leon & Ave Dr. Ashford

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

14 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 15 0 15 Perm

318 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 346 0 346 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

7954 1900 5.0 0.81 1.00 1.00 7513 1.00 7513 0.92 8646 3 8886 NA 2

224 1900

0.92 0 0 0

593 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 645 0 645 custom

0.92 243 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

4 37.0 37.0 0.26 5.0 3.0 468 0.01 0.03 38.2 1.00 0.0 38.2 D

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8 37.0 37.0 0.26 5.0 3.0 426

37.0 37.0 0.26 5.0 3.0 492 0.19 0.70 46.5 1.00 4.5 51.1 D 50.5 D

294.7 F 358.3 1.70 140.0 147.7% 15

c0.40 1.51 51.5 1.00 243.2 294.7 F

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

0.92 0 0 0

93.0 93.0 0.66 5.0 3.0 4991 c1.18 1.78 23.5 1.00 352.0 375.5 F 375.5 F

0.0 A F 10.0 H

Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Cll Roberto H Todd & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

150 1900

432 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 0.99 3396 0.89 3043 0.92 470 0 796 NA 4

150 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

143 1900

260 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 155 0 0

0.92 283 0 0 Perm

689 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.99 3491 0.65 2284 0.92 749 0 1032 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 163 0 0

458 1900 5.0 0.95 0.96 1.00 3413 1.00 3413 0.92 498 0 653 NA 2

0.92 163 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

17.8 17.8 0.30 5.0 3.0 906

6

32.0 32.0 0.54 5.0 3.0 1826 0.19

c0.26 0.88 20.0 1.00 9.7 29.6 C 29.6 C

0.0 A 19.7 0.86 59.8 77.4% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

0.92 0 0 0

32.0 32.0 0.54 5.0 3.0 1222 c0.45 0.84 11.8 1.00 7.2 19.0 B 19.0 B

0.36 8.0 1.00 0.5 8.5 A 8.5 A B 10.0 D

Synchro 8 Report Page 2 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: Cll Cerra & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

491 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3446 1.00 3446 0.92 534 0 648 NA 4

105 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

38 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 41 0 0 Perm

63 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.98 1828 0.98 1828 0.92 68 0 109 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 114 0 0

2 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 2 0 2 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

13.6 13.6 0.33 5.0 3.0 1151 c0.19

13.6 13.6 0.33 5.0 3.0 623 0.00

0.56 11.1 1.00 0.6 11.7 B 11.7 B

0.00 9.0 1.00 0.0 9.0 A 9.0 A 11.2 0.33 40.7 30.7% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

6

0.92 0 0 0

17.1 17.1 0.42 5.0 3.0 768 0.06 0.14 7.3 1.00 0.4 7.7 A 7.7 A

0.0 A B 10.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 3 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 15: Cll Roberto H Todd & Ave Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

20 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 22 0 22 NA 4

0 1900

78 1900

183 1900

151 1900

0 1900

0.92 199 0 0

0.92 164 0 0 pm+pt 5 2

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

551 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3431 1.00 3431 0.92 599 31 722 NA 6

142 1900

0.92 85 0 0 Perm

545 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.99 3501 0.64 2264 0.92 592 0 756 NA 2

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

552 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3403 0.92 3147 0.92 600 50 834 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

17.3 17.3 0.32 5.0 3.0 594 0.01

17.3 17.3 0.32 5.0 3.0 1003 c0.27 0.83 17.2 1.00 6.0 23.1 C 23.1 C

0.04 12.8 1.00 0.0 12.8 B 12.8 B 15.3 0.73 54.3 78.4% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

27.0 27.0 0.50 5.0 3.0 1126

0.92 154 0 0

27.0 27.0 0.50 5.0 3.0 1706 0.21

c0.33 0.67 10.3 1.00 1.6 11.9 B 11.9 B

0.42 8.7 1.00 0.8 9.5 A 9.5 A B 10.0 D

Synchro 8 Report Page 4 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 18: Cll Dr. Manuel Fernandez Pavia & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

548 1900 5.0 0.95 0.96 1.00 3404 1.00 3404 0.92 596 78 721 NA 4

187 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

372 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 0.92 404 67 337 Perm

0 1900

0.92 203 0 0

272 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 296 0 296 NA 2

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

14.3 14.3 0.33 5.0 3.0 1122 c0.21

19.1 19.1 0.44 5.0 3.0 820 0.16

0.64 12.4 1.00 1.3 13.6 B 13.6 B

0.36 8.1 1.00 1.2 9.3 A 10.3 B

0.0 A 12.1 0.55 43.4 52.5% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2 19.1 19.1 0.44 5.0 3.0 697 c0.21 0.48 8.6 1.00 2.4 11.0 B

0.0 A

B 10.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 5 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 19: Cll Dr. Manuel Fernandez Pavia & Ave Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

20 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 22 0 22 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

430 1900

504 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 548 0 548 NA 2

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

764 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 830 0 830 Perm

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

1225 1900 5.0 0.95 0.96 1.00 3401 1.00 3401 0.92 1332 0 1799 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

445 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 484 0 484 custom

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

58.0 58.0 0.48 5.0 3.0 900 0.01

58.0 58.0 0.48 5.0 3.0 1644 c0.53

0.02 16.2 1.00 0.0 16.2 B 16.2 B

1.09 31.0 1.00 52.7 83.7 F 83.7 F 70.6 1.09 120.0 130.0% 15

0.92 467 0 0

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2 52.0 52.0 0.43 5.0 3.0 767 c0.47 1.08 34.0 1.00 57.0 91.0 F

6 52.0 52.0 0.43 5.0 3.0 698

52.0 52.0 0.43 5.0 3.0 807 0.29 0.68 27.3 1.00 4.6 31.9 C 67.5 E

33.1 C

0.30 0.69 27.5 1.00 5.6 33.1 C

E 10.0 H

Synchro 8 Report Page 6 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 24: Cll Jose Fidalgo Diaz & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

436 1900

483 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.98 3443 0.82 2880 0.92 525 0 1032 NA 4

30 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

410 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 446 0 446 Perm

79 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 86 0 86 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 33 0 0

8 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 9 0 9 NA 8

0.92 474 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

25.2 25.2 0.43 5.0 3.0 1245

6 23.1 23.1 0.40 5.0 3.0 701

25.2 25.2 0.43 5.0 3.0 805 0.00

c0.36 0.83 14.6 1.00 4.7 19.3 B 19.3 B

0.01 9.4 1.00 0.0 9.4 A 9.4 A 18.6 0.74 58.3 61.9% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

c0.25 0.64 14.2 1.00 4.4 18.6 B

0.0 A

0.92 0 0 0

23.1 23.1 0.40 5.0 3.0 738 0.05 0.12 11.1 1.00 0.3 11.5 B 17.4 B

B 10.0 B

Synchro 8 Report Page 7 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 25: Cll Jose Fidalgo Diaz & Ave Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

20 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 22 0 22 NA 4

0 1900

100 1900

235 1900

352 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 383 0 383 NA 2

0 1900

0.92 109 0 0 Perm

89 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.24 441 0.92 97 0 97 Perm

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

829 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3417 0.92 3168 0.92 901 0 1265 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

493 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 536 0 536 NA 6

205 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 0.92 223 0 223 Perm

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

27.2 27.2 0.46 5.0 3.0 856 0.01

0.92 255 0 0

27.2 27.2 0.46 5.0 3.0 1456 c0.40 0.87 14.4 1.00 5.8 20.2 C 20.2 C

0.03 8.8 1.00 0.0 8.8 A 8.8 A 20.6 0.83 59.2 80.0% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2 22.0 22.0 0.37 5.0 3.0 164 0.22 0.59 15.0 1.00 14.7 29.7 C

22.0 22.0 0.37 5.0 3.0 692 0.21

22.0 22.0 0.37 5.0 3.0 692 c0.29

0.55 14.7 1.00 3.2 17.9 B 20.3 C

0.77 16.4 1.00 8.3 24.7 C 22.0 C

6 22.0 22.0 0.37 5.0 3.0 588 0.14 0.38 13.6 1.00 1.9 15.5 B

C 10.0 D

Synchro 8 Report Page 8 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 30: Fernandez Juncos & Ave Borinquen

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

382 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3524 1.00 3524 0.92 415 0 427 NA 4

11 1900

153 1900

0 1900

0 1900

98 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 107 0 0 Perm

995 1900 5.0 0.91 0.97 1.00 4920 0.91 4511 0.92 1082 0 1475 NA 6

263 1900

0.92 166 0 0 Split 8

5 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 5 0 5 NA 2

0 1900

0.92 12 0 0

317 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.98 3483 0.98 3483 0.92 345 0 511 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

12.7 12.7 0.19 5.0 3.0 679 c0.12

14.1 14.1 0.21 5.0 3.0 745 c0.15

24.1 24.1 0.37 5.0 3.0 681 0.00

0.63 24.4 1.00 1.8 26.3 C 26.3 C

0.69 23.9 1.00 2.6 26.5 C 26.5 C

0.01 13.3 1.00 0.0 13.3 B 13.3 B

26.3 0.77 65.9 65.9% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

6

0.92 286 0 0

24.1 24.1 0.37 5.0 3.0 1650 c0.33 0.89 19.7 1.00 6.6 26.3 C 26.3 C

C 15.0 C

Synchro 8 Report Page 9 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 31: Ave Ponce De Leon & Ave Borinquen

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

151 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 164 0 164 Split 4

203 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 221 0 221 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

43 1900

87 1900

0 1900

0.92 47 0 0

0.92 95 0 0 Perm

0.92 22 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

9 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 10 0 10 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

668 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.99 3506 0.92 3229 0.92 726 0 843 NA 2

20 1900

0.92 0 0 0

169 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3431 1.00 3431 0.92 184 0 231 NA 8

11.6 11.6 0.22 5.0 3.0 382 0.09

11.6 11.6 0.22 5.0 3.0 402 c0.12

9.0 9.0 0.17 5.0 3.0 574 c0.07

0.43 18.2 1.00 0.8 19.0 B

0.55 18.8 1.00 1.5 20.3 C 19.8 B

0.40 20.0 1.00 0.5 20.5 C 20.5 C

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

20.7 0.62 53.8 51.9% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2

18.2 18.2 0.34 5.0 3.0 1092

0.92 0 0 0

18.2 18.2 0.34 5.0 3.0 630 0.01

c0.26 0.77 15.9 1.00 5.3 21.2 C 21.2 C

0.02 11.8 1.00 0.0 11.9 B 11.9 B C 15.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 10 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Calle Valdes & Cll Del Tren

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

35 1900 4.0 1.00 0.99 1.00 1844 1.00 1844 0.92 38 2 39 NA 6

3 1900

0.92 0 0 0

11 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 12 0 12 NA 468

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

10

10

46.0 46.0 0.81

0.0 A

0.0 A 11.7 0.03 56.5 6.7% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

1517 c0.01

16.2 16.2 0.29 4.0 3.0 529 c0.02

0.01 1.0 0.79 0.0 0.8 A 0.8 A

0.07 14.7 1.00 0.3 15.0 B 15.0 B

0.92 3 0 0

B 10.5 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 11 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Concepcion de Gracia & Cll Del Tren

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

WBL

WBR

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

0 1900

331 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 360 278 82 custom

6 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 7 0 7 NA 24

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

20 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 22 0 22 NA 64

0.92 0 0 0

10 14.3 14.3 0.23 5.0 3.0 367

20.0 B

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

c0.05 0.22 19.7 1.00 0.3 20.0 B

38.4 38.4 0.61

38.4 38.4 0.61

1141 0.00

1141 c0.01

0.01 4.7 0.46 0.0 2.2 A 2.2 A

0.02 4.8 1.00 0.0 4.8 A 4.8 A

18.8 0.07 62.7 32.2% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

B 10.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 12 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 36: Concepcion de Gracia & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

2 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0 1900 5.0 1.00 0.99 0.96 1760 0.84 1541 0.92 0 1 21 NA 6

2 1900

0.92 0 0 0

1 271 1900 1900 5.0 5.0 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 1803 2787 0.92 1.00 1713 2787 0.92 0.92 1 295 0 0 3 295 NA custom 2 4 10 2 18.1 52.7 18.1 52.7 0.29 0.84 5.0 3.0 495 2787 c0.06 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.11 15.9 0.9 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 15.9 0.9 B A 1.0 A

18 1900

0.92 0 0 0

775 5 1900 1900 5.0 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 3539 1583 1.00 1.00 3539 1583 0.92 0.92 842 5 0 4 842 1 NA custom 4 10 4 34.6 15.3 34.6 15.3 0.55 0.24 5.0 3.0 1953 386 c0.24 0.00 0.43 0.00 8.3 17.9 1.00 1.00 0.2 0.0 8.4 17.9 A B 8.5 A

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

0.0 A 6.6 0.30 62.7 37.5% 15

0.92 2 0 0 Perm 2

HCM Level of Service

A

Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

5.0 A

0.92 20 0 0 Perm 6

0.92 2 0 0

18.1 18.1 0.29 5.0 3.0 445 0.01 0.05 16.1 0.73 0.0 11.7 B 11.7 B

Synchro 8 Report Page 13 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 39: Fernadez Juncos & Calle Valdes

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

0 1900

313 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 340 0 340 NA 8

1113 1900 4.0 0.95 0.99 1.00 3514 1.00 3514 0.92 1210 4 1266 NA 4

55 1900

32 1900 4.0 1.00 0.99 0.96 1762 0.96 1762 0.92 35 2 36 NA 6 10

3 1900

25.8 25.8 0.46 4.0 3.0 1616 0.10

25.8 25.8 0.46 4.0 3.0 1605 c0.36

708 c0.02

0.21 9.2 1.00 0.1 9.3 A 9.3 A

0.79 13.0 1.00 2.7 15.7 B 15.7 B

0.05 10.3 0.19 0.0 2.0 A 2.0 A

0.92 0 0 0 Perm 8

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

14.1 0.44 56.5 42.5% 15

0.92 60 0 0

0.92 3 0 0

22.7 22.7 0.40

HCM Level of Service

B

Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

8.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 14 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Cll Matias Ledesma & Ave Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

710 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3530 1.00 3530 0.92 772 3 783 NA 4

13 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

18 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 26 0 0

0.92 20 0 0 Perm

7 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.97 1799 0.88 1640 0.92 8 0 28 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0 1900 4.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 0 15 11 NA 2

24 1900

0.92 14 0 0

11 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 12 0 12 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

14.0 14.0 0.37 4.0 3.0 1297 c0.22

14.0 14.0 0.37 4.0 3.0 685 0.01

16.1 16.1 0.42 4.0 3.0 681 0.01

0.60 9.8 1.00 0.8 10.6 B 10.6 B

0.02 7.7 1.00 0.0 7.7 A 7.7 A

0.02 6.4 1.00 0.0 6.4 A 6.4 A

10.3 0.30 38.1 34.7% 15

6

0.92 0 0 0

16.1 16.1 0.42 4.0 3.0 693 c0.02 0.04 6.5 1.00 0.1 6.6 A 6.6 A

HCM Level of Service

B

Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

8.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 15 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Fernandez Juncos & Cll Matias Ledesma

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

2 1900

407 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3533 0.95 3360 0.92 442 2 447 NA 4

5 1900

22 1900

12 1900

15 1900

9 1900

0.92 13 0 0

0.92 16 0 0 Perm

0.92 23 0 0

0.92 10 0 0 Perm

8 1900 4.0 1.00 0.93 0.99 1705 0.96 1651 0.92 9 15 27 NA 6

21 1900

0.92 24 0 0 Perm

3 1900 4.0 1.00 0.93 0.98 1693 0.93 1598 0.92 3 15 27 NA 2

21 1900

0.92 5 0 0

1053 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3530 0.94 3330 0.92 1145 2 1180 NA 8

0.92 2 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

20.1 20.1 0.46 4.0 3.0 1531 0.13 0.29 7.5 1.00 0.1 7.6 A 7.6 A

20.1 20.1 0.46 4.0 3.0 1518 c0.35 0.78 10.1 1.00 2.6 12.7 B 12.7 B

11.2 0.45 44.1 55.4% 15

2

6

16.0 16.0 0.36 4.0 3.0 580 c0.02 0.05 9.1 1.00 0.2 9.3 A 9.3 A

0.92 23 0 0

16.0 16.0 0.36 4.0 3.0 599 0.02 0.05 9.1 1.00 0.1 9.2 A 9.2 A

HCM Level of Service

B

Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

8.0 B

Synchro 8 Report Page 16 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 36: Ave Borinquen & PR-1 Off-Ramp

11/11/2011

Movement Lane Configurations Sign Control Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 0.92 0

Stop 15 0.92 16

94 0.92 102

24 0.92 26

Stop 89 0.92 97

0 0.92 0

0 0.92 0

Stop 0 0.92 0

0 0.92 0

513 0.92 558

Yield 37 0.92 40

2 0.92 2

Direction, Lane # Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

EB 1 16 0 0 0.03 6.3 0.03 528 8.3 8.5 A

WB 1 123 26 0 0.08 5.9 0.20 568 10.4 10.4 B

SB 1 600 558 2 0.22 4.8 0.80 734 24.3 24.3 C

Intersection Summary Delay HCM Level of Service Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

EB 2 102 0 102 -0.67 5.6 0.16 591 8.5

20.0 C 52.3% 15

ICU Level of Service

A

Synchro 8 Report Page 17 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 39: Ave Borinquen & PR-1 On-ramp

11/11/2011

Movement Lane Configurations Sign Control Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

126 0.92 137

Stop 481 0.92 523

0 0.92 0

0 0.92 0

Stop 70 0.92 76

655 0.92 712

43 0.92 47

Stop 260 0.92 283

25 0.92 27

0 0.92 0

Stop 0 0.92 0

0 0.92 0

Direction, Lane # Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

EB 1 660 137 0 0.08 5.3 0.96 680 48.5 48.5 E

WB 1 76 0 0 0.03 6.1 0.13 564 10.0 11.4 B

WB 2 712 0 712 -0.57 3.2 0.63 1119 11.5

NB 1 357 47 27 0.01 5.9 0.59 600 17.0 17.0 C

Intersection Summary Delay HCM Level of Service Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

26.1 D 100.4% 15

ICU Level of Service

G

Synchro 8 Report Page 18 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Ave Dr. Ashford & Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

4 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 4 0 4 Perm

420 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 457 0 457 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

4369 1900 5.0 0.81 0.99 1.00 7469 1.00 7469 0.92 4749 9 5080 NA 2

313 1900

0.92 0 0 0

790 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 859 0 859 custom

0.92 340 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

4 62.0 62.0 0.41 5.0 3.0 732 0.00 0.01 25.9 1.00 0.0 25.9 C

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8 62.0 62.0 0.41 5.0 3.0 666

62.0 62.0 0.41 5.0 3.0 770 0.25 0.59 34.2 1.00 1.2 35.4 D 35.4 D

185.5 F 167.6 1.30 150.0 119.6% 15

c0.53 1.29 44.0 1.00 141.5 185.5 F

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

0.92 0 0 0

78.0 78.0 0.52 5.0 3.0 3884 c0.68 1.31 36.0 1.00 140.6 176.6 F 176.6 F

0.0 A F 10.0 H

Synchro 8 Report Page 19 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Cll Roberto H Todd & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

259 1900

592 1900 5.0 0.95 0.98 0.99 3412 0.87 2998 0.92 643 0 1098 NA 4

159 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

128 1900

221 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 139 0 0

0.92 240 0 0 Perm

1249 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.99 3513 0.57 2031 0.92 1358 0 1598 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 173 0 0

837 1900 5.0 0.95 0.98 1.00 3469 1.00 3469 0.92 910 0 1049 NA 2

0.92 282 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

38.0 38.0 0.29 5.0 3.0 876

6

82.0 82.0 0.63 5.0 3.0 2188 0.30

c0.37 1.25 46.0 1.00 123.4 169.4 F 169.4 F

0.0 A 114.1 1.25 130.0 109.6% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

0.92 0 0 0

82.0 82.0 0.63 5.0 3.0 1281 c0.79 1.25 24.0 1.00 118.0 142.0 F 142.0 F

0.48 12.7 1.00 0.8 13.5 B 13.5 B F 10.0 H

Synchro 8 Report Page 20 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: Cll Cerra & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

569 1900 5.0 0.95 0.96 1.00 3385 1.00 3385 0.92 618 0 870 NA 4

232 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

67 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 73 0 0 Perm

86 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.98 1823 0.98 1823 0.92 93 0 166 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 252 0 0

2 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 2 0 2 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

16.2 16.2 0.37 5.0 3.0 1266 c0.26

16.2 16.2 0.37 5.0 3.0 697 0.00

0.69 11.4 1.00 1.6 13.0 B 13.0 B

0.00 8.5 1.00 0.0 8.5 A 8.5 A 12.4 0.45 43.3 39.7% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

6

0.92 0 0 0

17.1 17.1 0.39 5.0 3.0 720 0.09 0.23 8.7 1.00 0.7 9.5 A 9.5 A

0.0 A B 10.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 21 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 15: Cll Roberto H Todd & Ave Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

37 1900

229 1900

157 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 40 0 0 Perm

0.92 249 0 0

0.92 171 0 0 pm+pt 5 2

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

570 1900 5.0 0.95 0.98 1.00 3477 1.00 3477 0.92 620 14 688 NA 6

75 1900

0.92 0 0 0

631 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.99 3504 0.66 2334 0.92 686 0 857 NA 2

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

748 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3413 0.95 3233 0.92 813 49 1053 NA 8

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

4

8

19.9 19.9 0.36 5.0 3.0 1172 c0.33 0.90 16.5 1.00 9.3 25.8 C 25.8 C

0.0 A 19.2 0.85 54.9 81.7% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

25.0 25.0 0.46 5.0 3.0 1063

0.92 82 0 0

25.0 25.0 0.46 5.0 3.0 1583 0.20

c0.37 0.81 12.9 1.00 4.6 17.4 B 17.4 B

0.43 10.2 1.00 0.9 11.0 B 11.0 B B 10.0 D

Synchro 8 Report Page 22 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 18: Cll Dr. Manuel Fernandez Pavia & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

662 1900 5.0 0.95 0.98 1.00 3474 1.00 3474 0.92 720 25 796 NA 4

93 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

322 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 0.92 350 41 309 Perm

0 1900

0.92 101 0 0

272 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 296 0 296 NA 2

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

14.7 14.7 0.34 5.0 3.0 1169 c0.23

19.0 19.0 0.43 5.0 3.0 810 0.16

0.68 12.5 1.00 1.6 14.1 B 14.1 B

0.37 8.3 1.00 1.3 9.6 A 10.2 B

0.0 A 12.4 0.55 43.7 49.5% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2 19.0 19.0 0.43 5.0 3.0 688 c0.19 0.45 8.7 1.00 2.1 10.8 B

0.0 A

B 10.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 23 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 19: Cll Dr. Manuel Fernandez Pavia & Ave Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

306 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

596 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 648 0 648 NA 2

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

388 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 422 0 422 Perm

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

1069 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3421 1.00 3421 0.92 1162 0 1495 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

449 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 488 0 488 custom

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

4

0.92 333 0 0

33.0 33.0 0.47 5.0 3.0 1613 c0.44 0.93 17.4 1.00 9.6 26.9 C 26.9 C

0.0 A 28.6 0.92 70.0 101.1% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2 27.0 27.0 0.39 5.0 3.0 683 0.24 0.62 17.3 1.00 4.2 21.5 C

6 27.0 27.0 0.39 5.0 3.0 621

27.0 27.0 0.39 5.0 3.0 719 c0.35 0.90 20.2 1.00 16.6 36.9 D 30.8 C

28.6 C

0.30 0.79 19.0 1.00 9.7 28.6 C

C 10.0 G

Synchro 8 Report Page 24 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 24: Cll Jose Fidalgo Diaz & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

658 1900

698 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.98 3455 0.81 2858 0.92 759 0 1474 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

438 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 476 0 476 Perm

116 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 126 0 126 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

8 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 9 0 9 NA 8

0.92 715 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

43.5 43.5 0.55 5.0 3.0 1564

6 26.0 26.0 0.33 5.0 3.0 579

43.5 43.5 0.55 5.0 3.0 1019 0.00

c0.52 0.94 16.8 1.00 11.7 28.6 C 28.6 C

0.01 8.2 1.00 0.0 8.2 A 8.2 A 29.9 0.90 79.5 75.7% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

c0.27 0.82 24.6 1.00 12.4 37.1 D

0.0 A

0.92 0 0 0

26.0 26.0 0.33 5.0 3.0 609 0.07 0.21 19.3 1.00 0.8 20.1 C 33.5 C

C 10.0 D

Synchro 8 Report Page 25 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 25: Ave Ponce De Leon & Cll Jose Fidalgo Diaz

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

131 1900

247 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 142 0 0 Perm

563 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 612 0 612 NA 2

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

94 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.31 577 0.92 102 0 102 Perm

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

593 1900 5.0 0.95 0.96 0.99 3382 0.91 3087 0.92 645 0 1055 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

486 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 528 0 528 NA 6

143 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 0.92 155 0 155 Perm

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

4

8

0.92 268 0 0

23.2 23.2 0.39 5.0 3.0 1210 c0.34 0.87 16.6 1.00 7.1 23.8 C 23.8 C

0.0 A 20.2 0.81 59.2 71.4% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2 26.0 26.0 0.44 5.0 3.0 253 0.18 0.40 11.3 1.00 4.7 16.0 B

26.0 26.0 0.44 5.0 3.0 818 c0.33

26.0 26.0 0.44 5.0 3.0 818 0.28

0.75 13.9 1.00 6.2 20.1 C 19.5 B

0.65 13.0 1.00 3.9 16.9 B 15.6 B

6 26.0 26.0 0.44 5.0 3.0 695 0.10 0.22 10.3 1.00 0.7 11.1 B

C 10.0 C

Synchro 8 Report Page 26 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 30: Ave Borinquen & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

470 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3526 1.00 3526 0.92 511 0 524 NA 4

12 1900

82 1900

0 1900

0 1900

75 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 82 0 0 Perm

1166 1900 5.0 0.91 0.98 1.00 4958 0.92 4585 0.92 1267 0 1588 NA 6

220 1900

0.92 89 0 0 Split 8

5 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 5 0 5 NA 2

0 1900

0.92 13 0 0

239 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.99 3495 0.99 3495 0.92 260 0 349 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

13.6 13.6 0.21 5.0 3.0 743 c0.15

11.8 11.8 0.18 5.0 3.0 639 c0.10

24.1 24.1 0.37 5.0 3.0 696 0.00

0.71 23.6 1.00 3.1 26.7 C 26.7 C

0.55 23.9 1.00 1.0 24.9 C 24.9 C

0.01 12.7 1.00 0.0 12.7 B 12.7 B

27.5 0.78 64.5 66.0% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

6

0.92 239 0 0

24.1 24.1 0.37 5.0 3.0 1713 c0.35 0.93 19.4 1.00 9.1 28.5 C 28.5 C

C 15.0 C

Synchro 8 Report Page 27 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 31: Ave Ponce De Leon & Ave Borinquen

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

249 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 271 0 271 Split 4

298 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 324 0 324 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

3 1900

20 1900

0 1900

0.92 3 0 0

0.92 22 0 0 Perm

0.92 92 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

6 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 7 0 7 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

700 1900 5.0 0.95 0.98 1.00 3479 0.95 3307 0.92 761 0 875 NA 2

85 1900

0.92 0 0 0

160 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3530 1.00 3530 0.92 174 0 177 NA 8

14.0 14.0 0.26 5.0 3.0 459 0.15

14.0 14.0 0.26 5.0 3.0 483 c0.17

6.5 6.5 0.12 5.0 3.0 425 c0.05

0.59 17.5 1.00 2.0 19.5 B

0.67 17.9 1.00 3.6 21.6 C 20.6 C

0.42 22.0 1.00 0.7 22.7 C 22.7 C

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

21.0 0.68 54.0 56.8% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2

18.5 18.5 0.34 5.0 3.0 1133

0.92 0 0 0

18.5 18.5 0.34 5.0 3.0 638 0.00

c0.26 0.77 15.9 1.00 5.1 21.0 C 21.0 C

0.01 11.7 1.00 0.0 11.7 B 11.7 B C 15.0 B

Synchro 8 Report Page 28 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Calle Valdes & Cll Del Tren

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

107 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 116 0 116 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

24 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 26 0 26 NA 468

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

10

10

64.9 64.9 0.82

0.0 A

0.0 A 23.5 0.09 79.0 9.0% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

1530 c0.01

16.2 16.2 0.21 4.0 3.0 382 c0.06

0.02 1.3 0.47 0.0 0.6 A 0.6 A

0.30 26.6 1.00 2.0 28.7 C 28.7 C

0.92 0 0 0

C 14.1 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 29 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Concepcion de Gracia & Cll Del Tren

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

WBL

WBR

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

0 1900

54 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 59 44 15 custom

12 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 13 0 13 NA 24

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

153 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 166 0 166 NA 64

0.92 0 0 0

10 16.0 16.0 0.25 5.0 3.0 397

18.7 B

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

c0.01 0.04 18.6 1.00 0.0 18.7 B

39.0 39.0 0.60

39.0 39.0 0.60

1118 0.01

1118 c0.09

0.01 5.2 0.13 0.0 0.7 A 0.7 A

0.15 5.7 1.00 0.1 5.8 A 5.8 A

8.7 0.12 65.0 15.0% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

A 10.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 30 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 36: Concepcion de Gracia & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

3 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0 1900 5.0 1.00 0.99 0.96 1762 0.73 1353 0.92 0 5 161 NA 6

12 1900

0.92 0 0 0

8 1382 1900 1900 5.0 5.0 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1840 2787 0.94 1.00 1758 2787 0.92 0.92 9 1502 0 0 12 1502 NA custom 2 4 10 2 18.0 55.0 18.0 55.0 0.28 0.85 5.0 3.0 487 2787 c0.31 0.01 0.23 0.02 0.54 17.1 1.4 1.00 1.00 0.1 0.2 17.2 1.6 B A 1.7 A

141 1900

0.92 0 0 0

373 4 1900 1900 5.0 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 3539 1583 1.00 1.00 3539 1583 0.92 0.92 405 4 0 3 405 1 NA custom 4 10 4 37.0 16.0 37.0 16.0 0.57 0.25 5.0 3.0 2015 390 0.11 0.00 0.20 0.00 6.8 18.5 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 6.9 18.5 A B 7.0 A

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

0.0 A 3.8 0.54 65.0 65.2% 15

0.92 3 0 0 Perm 2

HCM Level of Service

A

Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

0.0 C

0.92 153 0 0 Perm 6

0.92 13 0 0

18.0 18.0 0.28 5.0 3.0 375 0.12 0.43 19.3 0.70 0.8 14.3 B 14.3 B

Synchro 8 Report Page 31 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 39: Fernadez Juncos & Calle Valdes

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

31 1900

1475 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3536 0.94 3318 0.92 1603 0 1637 NA 8

418 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3527 1.00 3527 0.92 454 2 463 NA 4

10 1900

45 1900 4.0 1.00 0.92 0.98 1682 0.98 1682 0.92 49 45 71 NA 6 10

62 1900

44.7 44.7 0.57 4.0 3.0 1877

44.7 44.7 0.57 4.0 3.0 1996 0.13

560 c0.04

0.23 8.6 1.00 0.1 8.6 A 8.6 A

0.13 18.4 0.04 0.1 0.9 A 0.9 A

0.92 34 0 0 Perm 8

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

c0.49 0.87 14.7 1.00 4.8 19.5 B 19.5 B

16.2 0.60 79.0 69.8% 15

0.92 11 0 0

0.92 67 0 0

26.3 26.3 0.33

HCM Level of Service

B

Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

8.0 C

Synchro 8 Report Page 32 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Cll Matias Ledesma & Ave Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

1375 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3538 1.00 3538 0.92 1495 0 1498 NA 4

3 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

53 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 28 0 0

0.92 58 0 0 Perm

6 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.96 1783 0.79 1471 0.92 7 0 65 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0 1900 4.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 0 15 13 NA 2

26 1900

0.92 3 0 0

13 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 14 0 14 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

25.3 25.3 0.51 4.0 3.0 1816 c0.42

25.3 25.3 0.51 4.0 3.0 956 0.01

16.0 16.0 0.32 4.0 3.0 523 0.01

0.82 10.1 1.00 3.2 13.3 B 13.3 B

0.01 5.9 1.00 0.0 5.9 A 5.9 A

0.03 11.3 1.00 0.1 11.4 B 11.4 B

13.2 0.56 49.3 54.7% 15

6

0.92 0 0 0

16.0 16.0 0.32 4.0 3.0 477 c0.04 0.14 11.8 1.00 0.6 12.4 B 12.4 B

HCM Level of Service

B

Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

8.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 33 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Fernandez Juncos & Cll Matias Ledesma

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

4 1900

1664 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3538 0.95 3375 0.92 1809 0 1816 NA 4

3 1900

4 1900

10 1900

24 1900

10 1900

0.92 11 0 0

0.92 26 0 0 Perm

0.92 60 0 0

0.92 11 0 0 Perm

11 1900 4.0 1.00 0.94 0.99 1729 0.94 1645 0.92 12 13 28 NA 6

17 1900

0.92 4 0 0 Perm

3 1900 4.0 1.00 0.91 0.99 1669 0.93 1569 0.92 3 13 76 NA 2

55 1900

0.92 3 0 0

706 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3531 0.95 3341 0.92 767 2 780 NA 8

0.92 4 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

36.0 36.0 0.60 4.0 3.0 2025 c0.54 0.90 10.4 1.00 5.7 16.1 B 16.1 B

36.0 36.0 0.60 4.0 3.0 2005 0.23 0.39 6.3 1.00 0.1 6.4 A 6.4 A

13.4 0.68 60.0 62.3% 15

2

6

16.0 16.0 0.27 4.0 3.0 418 c0.05 0.18 17.0 1.00 1.0 17.9 B 17.9 B

0.92 18 0 0

16.0 16.0 0.27 4.0 3.0 439 0.02 0.06 16.4 1.00 0.3 16.7 B 16.7 B

HCM Level of Service

B

Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

8.0 B

Synchro 8 Report Page 34 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 36: Ave Borinquen & PR-1 Off-Ramp

11/11/2011

Movement Lane Configurations Sign Control Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 0.92 0

Stop 9 0.92 10

39 0.92 42

9 0.92 10

Stop 104 0.92 113

0 0.92 0

0 0.92 0

Stop 0 0.92 0

0 0.92 0

601 0.92 653

Yield 28 0.92 30

18 0.92 20

Direction, Lane # Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

EB 1 10 0 0 0.03 6.5 0.02 529 8.5 8.1 A

WB 1 123 10 0 0.05 5.9 0.20 585 10.4 10.4 B

SB 1 703 653 20 0.20 4.6 0.90 771 34.3 34.3 D

Intersection Summary Delay HCM Level of Service Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

EB 2 42 0 42 -0.67 5.8 0.07 592 8.1

29.4 D 55.2% 15

ICU Level of Service

B

Synchro 8 Report Page 35 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 39: Ave Borinquen & PR-1 On-ramp

11/11/2011

Movement Lane Configurations Sign Control Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

144 0.92 157

Stop 496 0.92 539

0 0.92 0

0 0.92 0

Stop 66 0.92 72

683 0.92 742

47 0.92 51

Stop 179 0.92 195

27 0.92 29

0 0.92 0

Stop 0 0.92 0

0 0.92 0

Direction, Lane # Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

EB 1 696 157 0 0.08 5.0 0.96 717 46.6 46.6 E

WB 1 72 0 0 0.03 5.8 0.12 598 9.6 11.9 B

WB 2 742 0 742 -0.57 3.2 0.66 1119 12.2

NB 1 275 51 29 0.01 5.9 0.45 600 13.6 13.6 B

Intersection Summary Delay HCM Level of Service Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)

Tren Liviano EIS 2011 Existing PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

25.7 D 100.0% 15

ICU Level of Service

G

Synchro 8 Report Page 36 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Ave Ponce De Leon & Ave Dr. Ashford

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

16 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 17 0 17 Perm

449 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 488 0 488 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

8706 1900 5.0 0.81 1.00 1.00 7508 1.00 7508 0.92 9463 4 9775 NA 2

291 1900

0.92 0 0 0

1114 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 1211 0 1211 custom

0.92 316 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

4 58.0 58.0 0.39 5.0 3.0 684 0.01 0.02 28.5 1.00 0.0 28.5 C

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8 58.0 58.0 0.39 5.0 3.0 623

58.0 58.0 0.39 5.0 3.0 720 0.26 0.68 38.2 1.00 2.5 40.8 D 40.4 D

476.6 F 610.6 2.20 150.0 189.6% 15

c0.75 1.94 46.0 1.00 430.6 476.6 F

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

0.92 0 0 0

82.0 82.0 0.55 5.0 3.0 4104 c1.30 2.38 34.0 1.00 622.6 656.6 F 656.6 F

0.0 A F 10.0 H

Synchro 8 Report Page 37 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Fernandez Juncos & Cll Roberto H Todd

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

171 1900

511 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 0.99 3400 0.89 3042 0.92 555 0 923 NA 4

167 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

160 1900

293 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 174 0 0

0.92 318 0 0 Perm

734 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.99 3489 0.61 2160 0.92 798 0 1116 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 182 0 0

495 1900 5.0 0.95 0.96 1.00 3409 1.00 3409 0.92 538 0 712 NA 2

0.92 186 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

25.0 25.0 0.31 5.0 3.0 951

6

45.0 45.0 0.56 5.0 3.0 1918 0.21

c0.30 0.97 27.1 1.00 22.2 49.3 D 49.3 D

0.0 A 30.7 0.94 80.0 84.5% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

0.92 0 0 0

45.0 45.0 0.56 5.0 3.0 1215 c0.52 0.92 15.8 1.00 12.5 28.3 C 28.3 C

0.37 9.7 1.00 0.6 10.2 B 10.2 B C 10.0 E

Synchro 8 Report Page 38 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: Cll Cerra & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

555 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3447 1.00 3447 0.92 603 0 729 NA 4

116 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

52 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 57 0 0 Perm

87 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.98 1828 0.98 1828 0.92 95 0 152 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 126 0 0

2 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 2 0 2 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

16.6 16.6 0.34 5.0 3.0 1173 c0.21

16.6 16.6 0.34 5.0 3.0 634 0.00

0.62 13.5 1.00 1.0 14.5 B 14.5 B

0.00 10.6 1.00 0.0 10.6 B 10.6 B 13.4 0.37 48.8 34.8% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

6

0.92 0 0 0

22.2 22.2 0.45 5.0 3.0 832 0.08 0.18 7.9 1.00 0.5 8.4 A 8.4 A

0.0 A B 10.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 39 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 15: Cll Roberto H Todd & Ave Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

20 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 22 0 22 NA 4

0 1900

84 1900

221 1900

162 1900

0 1900

0.92 240 0 0

0.92 176 0 0 pm+pt 5 2

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

594 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3421 1.00 3421 0.92 646 34 797 NA 6

170 1900

0.92 91 0 0 Perm

601 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.99 3502 0.61 2150 0.92 653 0 829 NA 2

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

644 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3401 0.92 3151 0.92 700 48 983 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

20.8 20.8 0.35 5.0 3.0 648 0.01

20.8 20.8 0.35 5.0 3.0 1096 c0.31 0.90 18.5 1.00 9.8 28.2 C 28.2 C

0.03 12.9 1.00 0.0 12.9 B 12.9 B 19.6 0.84 59.8 86.3% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

29.0 29.0 0.48 5.0 3.0 1043

0.92 185 0 0

29.0 29.0 0.48 5.0 3.0 1659 0.23

c0.39 0.79 12.9 1.00 4.3 17.2 B 17.2 B

0.48 10.3 1.00 1.0 11.3 B 11.3 B B 10.0 E

Synchro 8 Report Page 40 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 18: Fernandez Juncos & Cll Dr. Manuel Fernandez Pavia

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

726 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 789 0 789 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

329 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 0.92 358 36 322 Perm

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

289 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 314 0 314 NA 2

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

19.0 19.0 0.34 5.0 3.0 1199 c0.22

27.1 27.1 0.48 5.0 3.0 900 0.17

0.66 15.8 1.00 1.3 17.1 B 17.1 B

0.35 9.0 1.00 1.1 10.1 B 10.6 B

0.0 A 14.1 0.52 56.1 48.8% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2 27.1 27.1 0.48 5.0 3.0 765 c0.20 0.42 9.4 1.00 1.7 11.1 B

0.0 A

B 10.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 41 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 19: Cll Dr. Manuel Fernandez Pavia & Ave Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

20 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 22 0 22 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

454 1900

492 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 535 0 535 NA 2

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

762 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 828 0 828 Perm

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

1322 1900 5.0 0.95 0.96 1.00 3404 1.00 3404 0.92 1437 0 1930 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

462 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 502 0 502 custom

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

60.0 60.0 0.50 5.0 3.0 932 0.01

60.0 60.0 0.50 5.0 3.0 1702 c0.57

0.02 15.2 1.00 0.0 15.2 B 15.2 B

1.13 30.0 1.00 68.2 98.2 F 98.2 F 82.5 1.13 120.0 134.4% 15

0.92 493 0 0

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2 50.0 50.0 0.42 5.0 3.0 738 c0.47 1.12 35.0 1.00 72.0 107.0 F

6 50.0 50.0 0.42 5.0 3.0 671

50.0 50.0 0.42 5.0 3.0 776 0.29 0.69 28.6 1.00 5.0 33.6 C 78.2 E

37.1 D

0.31 0.75 29.7 1.00 7.5 37.1 D

F 10.0 H

Synchro 8 Report Page 42 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 24: Fernandez Juncos & Cll Jose Fidalgo Diaz

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

442 1900

614 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.98 3452 0.83 2920 0.92 667 0 1186 NA 4

36 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

428 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 465 0 465 Perm

77 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 84 0 84 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 39 0 0

8 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 9 0 9 NA 8

0.92 480 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

27.1 27.1 0.46 5.0 3.0 1339

6 22.0 22.0 0.37 5.0 3.0 659

27.1 27.1 0.46 5.0 3.0 854 0.00

c0.41 0.89 14.6 1.00 7.4 22.0 C 22.0 C

0.01 8.7 1.00 0.0 8.7 A 8.7 A 21.5 0.81 59.1 66.3% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

c0.26 0.71 15.8 1.00 6.3 22.0 C

0.0 A

0.92 0 0 0

22.0 22.0 0.37 5.0 3.0 694 0.05 0.12 12.2 1.00 0.4 12.6 B 20.6 C

C 10.0 C

Synchro 8 Report Page 43 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 25: Cll Jose Fidalgo Diaz & Ave Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

20 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 22 0 22 NA 4

0 1900

103 1900

257 1900

358 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 389 0 389 NA 2

0 1900

0.92 112 0 0 Perm

90 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.21 393 0.92 98 0 98 Perm

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

905 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3418 0.92 3172 0.92 984 0 1375 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

509 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 553 0 553 NA 6

223 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 0.92 242 0 242 Perm

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

28.0 28.0 0.47 5.0 3.0 869 0.01

0.92 279 0 0

28.0 28.0 0.47 5.0 3.0 1480 c0.43 0.93 15.1 1.00 10.5 25.5 C 25.5 C

0.03 8.6 1.00 0.0 8.6 A 8.6 A 24.4 0.88 60.0 83.8% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2 22.0 22.0 0.37 5.0 3.0 144 0.25 0.68 16.0 1.00 23.0 39.0 D

22.0 22.0 0.37 5.0 3.0 683 0.21

22.0 22.0 0.37 5.0 3.0 683 c0.30

0.57 15.2 1.00 3.4 18.6 B 22.7 C

0.81 17.1 1.00 10.0 27.1 C 23.9 C

6 22.0 22.0 0.37 5.0 3.0 580 0.15 0.42 14.2 1.00 2.2 16.4 B

C 10.0 E

Synchro 8 Report Page 44 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 30: Ave Borinquen & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

398 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1855 1.00 1855 0.92 433 0 446 NA 4

12 1900

151 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 164 0 164 Split 8

307 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 334 0 334 NA 8

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

113 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 123 0 0 Perm

1135 1900 5.0 0.91 0.97 1.00 4922 0.91 4501 0.92 1234 0 1675 NA 6

293 1900

0.92 0 0 0

5 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 5 0 5 NA 2

22.0 22.0 0.24 5.0 3.0 453 c0.24

17.0 17.0 0.19 5.0 3.0 334 0.09

17.0 17.0 0.19 5.0 3.0 352 c0.18

36.0 36.0 0.40 5.0 3.0 745 0.00

0.98 33.8 1.00 38.0 71.8 E 71.8 E

0.49 32.6 1.00 1.1 33.8 C

0.95 36.1 1.00 34.4 70.5 E 58.4 E

0.01 16.2 1.00 0.0 16.3 B 16.3 B

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

0.92 13 0 0

45.7 0.95 90.0 75.5% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

6

0.92 318 0 0

36.0 36.0 0.40 5.0 3.0 1800 c0.37 0.93 25.8 1.00 9.2 35.0 C 35.0 C

D 15.0 D

Synchro 8 Report Page 45 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 31: Ave Borinquen & Ave Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

160 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 174 0 174 Split 4

215 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 234 0 234 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

43 1900

96 1900

0 1900

0.92 47 0 0

0.92 104 0 0 Perm

0.92 24 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

9 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 10 0 10 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

732 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.99 3506 0.91 3225 0.92 796 0 924 NA 2

22 1900

0.92 0 0 0

169 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3431 1.00 3431 0.92 184 0 231 NA 8

11.9 11.9 0.22 5.0 3.0 389 0.10

11.9 11.9 0.22 5.0 3.0 410 c0.13

9.0 9.0 0.17 5.0 3.0 571 c0.07

0.45 18.3 1.00 0.8 19.1 B

0.57 18.8 1.00 1.9 20.7 C 20.0 C

0.40 20.2 1.00 0.5 20.6 C 20.6 C

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

23.1 0.66 54.1 54.4% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2

18.2 18.2 0.34 5.0 3.0 1085

0.92 0 0 0

18.2 18.2 0.34 5.0 3.0 627 0.01

c0.29 0.85 16.7 1.00 8.5 25.1 C 25.1 C

0.02 12.0 1.00 0.0 12.0 B 12.0 B C 15.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 46 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Calle Valdes & Cll Del Tren

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

43 1900 4.0 1.00 0.99 1.00 1848 1.00 1848 0.92 47 2 48 NA 6

3 1900

0.92 0 0 0

55 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 60 0 60 NA 468

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

10

10

47.8 47.8 0.80

0.0 A

0.0 A 7.5 0.06 59.5 6.7% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

1497 c0.03

16.9 16.9 0.28 4.0 3.0 525 c0.03

0.04 1.2 0.39 0.0 0.5 A 0.5 A

0.09 15.7 1.00 0.3 16.0 B 16.0 B

0.92 3 0 0

A 11.7 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 47 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Concepcion de Gracia & Cll Del Tren

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

WBL

WBR

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

0 1900

331 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 360 278 82 custom

5 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 5 0 5 NA 24

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

24 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 26 0 26 NA 64

0.92 0 0 0

10 14.3 14.3 0.23 5.0 3.0 367

20.0 C

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

c0.05 0.22 19.7 1.00 0.3 20.0 C

38.5 38.5 0.61

38.5 38.5 0.61

1142 0.00

1142 c0.01

0.00 4.7 0.32 0.0 1.5 A 1.5 A

0.02 4.8 1.00 0.0 4.8 A 4.8 A

18.8 0.08 62.8 32.2% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

B 10.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 48 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 36: Concepcion de Gracia & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

76 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

797 4 1900 1900 5.0 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 3539 1583 1.00 1.00 3539 1583 0.92 0.92 866 4 0 3 866 1 NA custom 4 10 4 34.7 15.4 34.7 15.4 0.55 0.25 5.0 3.0 1955 388 c0.24 0.00 0.44 0.00 8.3 17.9 1.00 1.00 0.2 0.0 8.5 17.9 A B 8.5 A

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

0.0 A 7.5 0.36 62.8 41.3% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

0.92 83 0 0 Perm 2

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

1 253 1900 1900 5.0 5.0 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1775 2787 0.73 1.00 1355 2787 0.92 0.92 1 275 0 0 84 275 NA custom 2 4 10 2 18.1 52.8 18.1 52.8 0.29 0.84 5.0 3.0 391 2787 0.05 c0.06 0.04 0.21 0.10 17.0 0.9 1.00 1.00 1.3 0.0 18.2 0.9 B A 4.9 A

3 1900

0 1900 5.0 1.00 0.88 0.99 1631 0.98 1604 0.92 0 16 10 NA 6

21 1900

0.92 3 0 0 Perm 6

0.92 23 0 0

18.1 18.1 0.29 5.0 3.0 462 0.01 0.02 16.0 0.58 0.0 9.3 A 9.3 A

A 10.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 49 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 39: Fernadez Juncos & Calle Valdes

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

0 1900

305 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 332 0 332 NA 8

1003 1900 4.0 0.95 0.99 1.00 3512 1.00 3512 0.92 1090 6 1144 NA 4

55 1900

40 1900 4.0 1.00 0.99 0.96 1764 0.96 1764 0.92 43 2 44 NA 6 10

3 1900

26.9 26.9 0.45 4.0 3.0 1600 0.09

26.9 26.9 0.45 4.0 3.0 1588 c0.33

729 c0.03

0.21 9.9 1.00 0.1 9.9 A 9.9 A

0.72 13.2 1.00 1.6 14.9 B 14.9 B

0.06 10.5 0.16 0.0 1.7 A 1.7 A

0.92 0 0 0 Perm 8

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

13.4 0.41 59.5 39.5% 15

0.92 60 0 0

0.92 3 0 0

24.6 24.6 0.41

HCM Level of Service

B

Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

8.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 50 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Cll Matias Ledesma & Ave Juan Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

706 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3533 1.00 3533 0.92 767 2 774 NA 4

8 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

11 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 14 0 0

0.92 12 0 0 Perm

3 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.96 1791 0.90 1668 0.92 3 0 15 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0 1900 4.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 0 8 6 NA 2

13 1900

0.92 9 0 0

11 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 12 0 12 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

16.5 16.5 0.38 4.0 3.0 1334 c0.22

16.5 16.5 0.38 4.0 3.0 703 0.01

19.2 19.2 0.44 4.0 3.0 708 0.00

0.58 10.8 1.00 0.6 11.5 B 11.5 B

0.02 8.5 1.00 0.0 8.5 A 8.5 A

0.01 6.9 1.00 0.0 6.9 A 6.9 A

11.3 0.28 43.7 33.9% 15

6

0.92 0 0 0

19.2 19.2 0.44 4.0 3.0 733 c0.01 0.02 6.9 1.00 0.1 7.0 A 7.0 A

HCM Level of Service

B

Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

8.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 51 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Fernandez Juncos & Cll Matias Ledesma

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

3 1900

501 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3532 0.95 3354 0.92 545 2 553 NA 4

6 1900

26 1900

13 1900

18 1900

11 1900

0.92 14 0 0

0.92 20 0 0 Perm

0.92 25 0 0

0.92 12 0 0 Perm

9 1900 4.0 1.00 0.93 0.99 1703 0.95 1640 0.92 10 19 30 NA 6

25 1900

0.92 28 0 0 Perm

4 1900 4.0 1.00 0.93 0.98 1700 0.91 1581 0.92 4 17 32 NA 2

23 1900

0.92 7 0 0

1222 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3530 0.94 3317 0.92 1328 1 1369 NA 8

0.92 3 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

30.9 30.9 0.55 4.0 3.0 1847 0.16 0.30 6.8 1.00 0.1 6.9 A 6.9 A

30.9 30.9 0.55 4.0 3.0 1827 c0.41 0.75 9.6 1.00 1.7 11.4 B 11.4 B

10.3 0.50 56.1 63.4% 15

2

6

17.2 17.2 0.31 4.0 3.0 485 c0.02 0.07 13.8 1.00 0.3 14.0 B 14.0 B

0.92 27 0 0

17.2 17.2 0.31 4.0 3.0 503 0.02 0.06 13.7 1.00 0.2 14.0 B 14.0 B

HCM Level of Service

B

Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

8.0 B

Synchro 8 Report Page 52 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 36: Ave Borinquen & PR-1 Off-Ramp

11/11/2011

Movement Lane Configurations Sign Control Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 0.92 0

Stop 16 0.92 17

99 0.92 108

25 0.92 27

Stop 94 0.92 102

0 0.92 0

0 0.92 0

Stop 0 0.92 0

0 0.92 0

542 0.92 589

Yield 39 0.92 42

2 0.92 2

Direction, Lane # Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

EB 1 17 0 0 0.03 6.5 0.03 528 8.5 8.7 A

WB 1 129 27 0 0.08 6.0 0.22 568 10.7 10.7 B

SB 1 634 589 2 0.22 4.9 0.86 730 29.6 29.6 D

Intersection Summary Delay HCM Level of Service Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

EB 2 108 0 108 -0.67 5.8 0.17 591 8.8

23.9 C 54.7% 15

ICU Level of Service

A

Synchro 8 Report Page 53 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 39: Ave Borinquen & PR-1 On-ramp

11/11/2011

Movement Lane Configurations Sign Control Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

136 0.92 148

Stop 508 0.92 552

0 0.92 0

0 0.92 0

Stop 73 0.92 79

698 0.92 759

46 0.92 50

Stop 282 0.92 307

27 0.92 29

0 0.92 0

Stop 0 0.92 0

0 0.92 0

Direction, Lane # Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

EB 1 700 148 0 0.08 5.4 1.05 660 70.2 70.2 F

WB 1 79 0 0 0.03 6.2 0.14 552 10.2 12.3 B

WB 2 759 0 759 -0.57 3.2 0.67 1119 12.6

NB 1 386 50 29 0.01 6.0 0.64 590 18.8 18.8 C

Intersection Summary Delay HCM Level of Service Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build AM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

34.7 D 106.5% 15

ICU Level of Service

G

Synchro 8 Report Page 54 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Ave Ponce De Leon & Ave Dr. Ashford

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

6 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 7 0 7 Perm

564 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 613 0 613 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

4503 1900 5.0 0.81 0.99 1.00 7444 1.00 7444 0.92 4895 12 5357 NA 2

436 1900

0.92 0 0 0

1423 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 1547 0 1547 custom

0.92 474 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

4 78.0 78.0 0.52 5.0 3.0 920 0.00 0.01 17.3 1.00 0.0 17.4 B

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No Build PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8 78.0 78.0 0.52 5.0 3.0 838

78.0 78.0 0.52 5.0 3.0 969 0.33 0.63 25.8 1.00 1.4 27.1 C 27.0 C

421.4 F 358.6 1.80 150.0 162.0% 15

c0.96 1.85 36.0 1.00 385.4 421.4 F

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

0.92 0 0 0

62.0 62.0 0.41 5.0 3.0 3077 c0.72 1.74 44.0 1.00 334.8 378.8 F 378.8 F

0.0 A F 10.0 H

Synchro 8 Report Page 55 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Fernandez Juncos & Cll Roberto H Todd

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

295 1900

694 1900 5.0 0.95 0.98 0.99 3415 0.87 3005 0.92 754 0 1268 NA 4

178 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

143 1900

249 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 155 0 0

0.92 271 0 0 Perm

1333 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.99 3512 0.55 1945 0.92 1449 0 1720 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 193 0 0

905 1900 5.0 0.95 0.98 1.00 3467 1.00 3467 0.92 984 0 1139 NA 2

0.92 321 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No-Build PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

36.0 36.0 0.30 5.0 3.0 902

6

74.0 74.0 0.62 5.0 3.0 2138 0.33

c0.42 1.41 42.0 1.00 189.3 231.3 F 231.3 F

0.0 A 168.0 1.43 120.0 119.6% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

0.92 0 0 0

74.0 74.0 0.62 5.0 3.0 1199 c0.88 1.43 23.0 1.00 200.4 223.4 F 223.4 F

0.53 13.1 1.00 1.0 14.1 B 14.1 B F 10.0 H

Synchro 8 Report Page 56 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: Fernandez Juncos & Cll Cerra

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

638 1900 5.0 0.95 0.96 1.00 3383 1.00 3383 0.92 693 0 982 NA 4

266 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

92 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 100 0 0 Perm

119 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.98 1823 0.98 1823 0.92 129 0 229 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 289 0 0

2 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 2 0 2 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No-Build PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

22.7 22.7 0.43 5.0 3.0 1452 c0.29

22.7 22.7 0.43 5.0 3.0 799 0.00

0.68 12.1 1.00 1.3 13.4 B 13.4 B

0.00 8.6 1.00 0.0 8.6 A 8.6 A 13.3 0.51 52.9 45.8% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

6

0.92 0 0 0

20.2 20.2 0.38 5.0 3.0 696 0.13 0.33 11.6 1.00 1.3 12.8 B 12.8 B

0.0 A B 10.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 57 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 15: Cll Roberto H Todd & Ave Ponde De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

20 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 22 0 22 NA 4

0 1900

39 1900

276 1900

168 1900

0 1900

0.92 300 0 0

0.92 183 0 0 pm+pt 5 2

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

616 1900 5.0 0.95 0.98 1.00 3469 1.00 3469 0.92 670 13 759 NA 6

94 1900

0.92 42 0 0 Perm

695 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.99 3505 0.62 2177 0.92 755 0 938 NA 2

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

869 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3410 0.95 3228 0.92 945 36 1251 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No-Build PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

32.0 32.0 0.40 5.0 3.0 745 0.01

32.0 32.0 0.40 5.0 3.0 1291 c0.39 0.97 23.5 1.00 17.9 41.4 D 41.4 D

0.03 14.6 1.00 0.0 14.6 B 14.6 B 31.1 0.94 80.0 93.9% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

38.0 38.0 0.48 5.0 3.0 1034

0.92 102 0 0

38.0 38.0 0.48 5.0 3.0 1648 0.22

c0.43 0.91 19.4 1.00 11.3 30.6 C 30.6 C

0.46 14.1 1.00 0.9 15.0 B 15.0 B C 10.0 F

Synchro 8 Report Page 58 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 18: Fernandez Juncos & Cll Dr. Manuel Fernandez Pavia

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

803 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 873 0 873 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

326 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 0.92 354 36 318 Perm

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

289 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 314 0 314 NA 2

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No-Build PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

20.0 20.0 0.36 5.0 3.0 1285 c0.25

25.1 25.1 0.46 5.0 3.0 849 0.17

0.68 14.8 1.00 1.4 16.3 B 16.3 B

0.37 9.8 1.00 1.2 11.1 B 11.6 B

0.0 A 14.3 0.55 55.1 50.7% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2 25.1 25.1 0.46 5.0 3.0 721 c0.20 0.44 10.2 1.00 1.9 12.2 B

0.0 A

B 10.0 A

Synchro 8 Report Page 59 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 19: Cll Dr. Manuel Fernandez Pavia & Ave Ponde De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

20 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 22 0 22 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

327 1900

586 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 637 0 637 NA 2

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

384 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 417 0 417 Perm

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

1145 1900 5.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3421 1.00 3421 0.92 1245 0 1600 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

464 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1611 1.00 1611 0.92 504 0 504 custom

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No-Build PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

40.0 40.0 0.50 5.0 3.0 932 0.01

40.0 40.0 0.50 5.0 3.0 1711 c0.47

0.02 10.1 1.00 0.0 10.1 B 10.1 B

0.94 18.8 1.00 10.0 28.8 C 28.8 C 31.9 0.93 80.0 104.6% 15

0.92 355 0 0

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2 30.0 30.0 0.38 5.0 3.0 664 0.24 0.63 20.4 1.00 4.5 24.9 C

6 30.0 30.0 0.38 5.0 3.0 604

30.0 30.0 0.38 5.0 3.0 699 c0.34 0.91 23.7 1.00 18.2 41.9 D 35.2 D

35.6 D

0.31 0.83 22.7 1.00 12.8 35.6 D

C 10.0 G

Synchro 8 Report Page 60 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 24: Fernandez Juncos & Cll Jose Fidalgo Diaz

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

667 1900

880 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.98 3465 0.82 2896 0.92 957 0 1682 NA 4

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

446 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 485 0 485 Perm

121 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 132 0 132 NA 6

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

8 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 9 0 9 NA 8

0.92 725 0 0 Perm 4

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No-Build PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

53.0 53.0 0.59 5.0 3.0 1705

6 27.0 27.0 0.30 5.0 3.0 531

53.0 53.0 0.59 5.0 3.0 1097 0.00

c0.58 0.99 18.1 1.00 18.5 36.6 D 36.6 D

0.01 7.6 1.00 0.0 7.6 A 7.6 A 39.3 0.96 90.0 80.0% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

c0.27 0.91 30.4 1.00 22.6 53.0 D

0.0 A

0.92 0 0 0

27.0 27.0 0.30 5.0 3.0 559 0.07 0.24 23.7 1.00 1.0 24.7 C 46.9 D

D 10.0 D

Synchro 8 Report Page 61 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 25: Cll Jose Fidalgo Diaz & Ave Ponce De Leon

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

20 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 22 0 22 NA 4

0 1900

135 1900

273 1900

575 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 625 0 625 NA 2

0 1900

0.92 147 0 0 Perm

94 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.27 511 0.92 102 0 102 Perm

0 1900

0.92 0 0 0

648 1900 5.0 0.95 0.96 0.99 3380 0.90 3078 0.92 704 0 1148 NA 8

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

502 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 546 0 546 NA 6

157 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 0.92 171 0 171 Perm

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No-Build PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

8

24.7 24.7 0.41 5.0 3.0 771 0.01

0.92 297 0 0

24.7 24.7 0.41 5.0 3.0 1273 c0.37 0.90 16.4 1.00 9.1 25.4 C 25.4 C

0.03 10.4 1.00 0.0 10.4 B 10.4 B 22.6 0.85 59.7 78.0% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

2 25.0 25.0 0.42 5.0 3.0 214 0.20 0.48 12.6 1.00 7.4 20.0 C

25.0 25.0 0.42 5.0 3.0 780 c0.34

25.0 25.0 0.42 5.0 3.0 780 0.29

0.80 15.2 1.00 8.5 23.7 C 23.2 C

0.70 14.3 1.00 5.2 19.5 B 17.7 B

6 25.0 25.0 0.42 5.0 3.0 663 0.11 0.26 11.3 1.00 0.9 12.2 B

C 10.0 D

Synchro 8 Report Page 62 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix 5.7-1

Traffic Analysis Data

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 30: Ave Borinquen & Fernandez Juncos

Movement Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS

11/11/2011

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0 1900

488 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1856 1.00 1856 0.92 530 0 544 NA 4

13 1900

80 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 87 0 87 Split 8

231 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 251 0 251 NA 8

0 1900

0 1900

0 1900

92 1900

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 0 0 0

0.92 100 0 0 Perm

1318 1900 5.0 0.91 0.98 1.00 4959 0.92 4569 0.92 1433 0 1798 NA 6

244 1900

0.92 0 0 0

5 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1.00 1863 0.92 5 0 5 NA 2

26.0 26.0 0.29 5.0 3.0 543 c0.29

14.9 14.9 0.17 5.0 3.0 297 0.05

14.9 14.9 0.17 5.0 3.0 312 c0.13

33.0 33.0 0.37 5.0 3.0 692 0.00

1.00 31.5 1.00 39.1 70.5 E 70.5 E

0.29 32.4 1.00 0.6 32.9 C

0.80 35.6 1.00 13.9 49.5 D 45.3 D

0.01 17.6 1.00 0.0 17.6 B 17.6 B

0.92 0 0 0

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group

Tren Liviano EIS 2030 No-Build PM Peak Hour Consultant: Antonio Di Mambro, P.C. Subconsultant: Epsilon Associates, Inc.

0.92 14 0 0

65.4 0.99 88.9 78.4% 15

HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service

6

0.92 265 0 0

33.0 33.0 0.37 5.0 3.0 1696 c0.39 1.06 28.0 1.00 39.8 67.7 E 67.7 E

E 15.0 D

Synchro 8 Report Page 63 Municipality of San Juan


Appendix Vol 1 Part I.pdf