This booklet is about how we commiuncate, in a way about miscommunication. People seem to think in order the communicate properly, we need a clarity. And this catalogue is an expression and experimentation on what I think of language and words. Words are really just symbols. It is people who gave them their meanings. Like Ren Magritte’s famous ‘Treachery of image’ said ‘‘This is not a pipe.’ It is only called a pipe because somoeone decidees to call it a pipe. The following pages, I took away the characteristics of the alphebets and words and tried turn it into a typograpzhic abtraction. This typorhaphy was based on lingustics such as Fernidan de Suassure and Roland Barthes.
The essence of things. These are inspired by the Deadgoodâ€™s wire table lamp by Dan Ziglam and Elliot Brook, which featured in the Design Event Mart and the New Domestc Lanscape. stripped off of their natural colout and every other attributes, they are still recognisable. Through semiotics, what we recongise is a symbol, a representation. Because these objects are so embedded in subconscous. Much like language itself, where words doesnâ€™t really have a meaning until someone gave it one. So can you guess what are the objects depicted in there?
n ge a a u e La
u i s skin th ge
tip of my words My language
It is as
rin T o n a ery e rub my
nguage ainst the other if I had words
M egaugnal y with desire
Luangage, Sussarue syas, is spieifc way. It is a ssytem, or niviadul emlenet is maennigl taht stcurtrue. In a stnorg adn Cuosre, Sassurue syas: â€œin lu olny dffirenecesâ€?... Teh pniot singifcniace, is eatsbishled tr one trem and antohere in teh vrey trems of teh sytesm iste terhe are no poistvie temrs p imoptrnace fro gasrpnig teh d teohry is teh pinricple taht lan and taht ecah sgin is cmopso feir (snigfinait) (wrods or sno (singifie) (cocnept).
awalys oarginesd in a a stcurtrue, werhe any idlses oiutsde teh cnofneis of n prseistnet psasgae in teh uangage (lnugae) tehre aor is not olny taht vuale, or rhuogh, teh rleatoin bteewen h lnagauge stsyem... but taht elf aer pordcut dfifreence: piror to the sytsem... of eqaul dsitnictveienss of Sauussreâ€™s naguge is a sstyem of sgins, oed of tow patrs: a sngioud-petatrn), and a singifeid
Everyon Everyone, Everyone, sEveryone, ih soithtfoetl t,fle own dev own device own devices m sown mrso fdevice ,rsoef c, E an idea Eve an idea ab Every s iEve an idea abo tidea ah tan ah w tuw ohab bt o goes on own goes on in own d s m r Everyon goes on in la e g a u g n e g a u g n a l i Everyone, ithtfon oeown tan fe Everyone, sEveryone, igoes h sowhich l t,in le a is i which is ve an ide t a h own dev which is ver m o r r f m o r f r a f y r e v an ig own device which is ve m f , own sown mrsthe o devices fdevice ,rso e c i truth goe the truth. goes e e g a u an idea a the truth. goe an idea abo the tidea atruth. h t u an tan ah idea w tuw abou o b w abo whic which m m o r f r goes on whic goes on inth anon uag nin e goes ggoes aeuggon lthe in la i the tr which is which is ve athe mwhich owhich rm f roarfisyris rvery efve vy the truth the truth. the truth. . the truth.
ne, left to his left to his l o,eto n o y r e v E eft nleft yEveryone, rsto e his v E Everyone, left to Everyone, left to h his i h s o i t h t f o e t l t , f e e n l o , e y n r e o v y left to his vices, forms Everyone, left to h es, forms e c i v e d n w o s, v e forms d n w o own devices, fo own devices, form es, forms s m r s o m f , r s o e f c , s i v e e c d i v n e w d own devices, forms Everyone, left to his about what own devices, form eryone, left to his bout what i t h t f o e t l t , f e e n l o , e y n r e o v y E r e v E yone, left to his o b a a d i n a out a e what d i n a an idea about w eryone, left to his an idea about wha bout what t a h w t a h t u w o b t u a o a b e a d a i e n an idea about what own devices, forms n in language an idea about wha devices, forms n language m f , r s o e f c , s i v e e c d i v n e w d o n w o devices, forms ne, left to his l n i n o s e o g anguage n o s e o g goes on in lang Everyone, left to n devices, forms left to his goes on in langua n language Everyone, left to h l , e n o y r e v E eft o to y r e his v E e g a e u g g a n u a g l n a i l n n o i s n e o o goes on in languag s i h s o i t h t f o e t t , f e e n o , e y n r e o v y Everyone, left to his an idea about what s very far from left to his goes on in langua Everyone, left to h idea about what ery far from a h t u w o b t u a o a b e a d a i e n d a i n a ea about what vices, forms r e v s i h c i h w ry s i far h c from h w which is very fa own devices, fo idea about what es, forms which is very far fr ery far from own devices, form e c i v e d n w o s, e forms d n w o m o r m f r o a r f y r a r e f v y r s e i v h s c i h which is very far fro s m r s o m f , r s o e f c , s i v e c d i v n e w d own devices, forms goes on in language h. es, forms which is very far fr own devices, form es on in language a n u a g l n a i l n n o i s n e o o s g e o g on in language about what . h t u r t e h t h t r t e h t the truth. an idea about w es on in language out what the truth. an idea about wha b a a e d i n a ut a e what d i n a the truth. . h t u . r h t t e u t a h w t a h t u w o b t u a o a b e a d a i e n an idea about what which is very far from out what the truth. an idea about wha ch is very far from rlanguage fisyris arvery efgoes v y r s e i v h s c i h h w c i h w hch far from in language goes on in lang very far from on in languag lhe n i n o s e o g anguage n o s e o g e g a e u g g a n u a g l n a i l n n o i s n e o o goes on in language truth. language goes on in languag truth. . h t u . r h t t e u h r t t e h t ruth. very far from which is very fa truth. ery far from which is very far fr e v s i h c i h w y s i far h c from h w m o r m f r o a r f y r a r e f v y r s e i v h s c i h h which is very far fro ery far from which is very far fr h. tu.rht the the truth. truth. tthe euhrtruth. tt truth. eht .htu.rht teu the
fact, from then on sch In fact, fromars engaged won In fact, from lyga th a kind of then on scholthen on scholof comparin ars engaged in sho ars engaged in different Ind a kindaof game kind of game European lanof comparing of comparing they sho different Indodifferent Indo-
“Language is a skin against the other. It instead of fingers, o “To try to write of my words. My la love is to conwith desire.” “To try to write front the muck to get drunk, an love is drink to conof language: that “Other countries drunkenness the muckis a consequen region of hysteria in France, front cou of “Other a pleasure of spinning language:out that where language is felt as the France, whichofishysteria sought:inwine is no is both too much of an effectregion leisurely act of drinking.” where language is felt as th and too little, is both too much of an effec excessive and leisurely a and too little, impoverished.” excessive and impoverished.”
Everyone, left to h goes on in languag
Everyone, left to his own devices, forms an idea abou goes on in language which isleft very far own fromdevices, the truth.for Everyone, to his goes on in language which is very far
in conc European lanEuropean lanthey should be interpr they should be in concrete terms. in concrete term
m wonder what exactly these connections holdnder in what exactshowed, and how wonder what exacthese connections ame ly these connections ng showed, owed, and how and how doguages with ould be interpreted another, one crete terms. and eventually guages with guagesthey with reted could not fail to interpreted one another, one another, “Language is a skin: I rub my language against the other. It is as if I had words instead of fingers, or fingers at the tip of my words. My language trembles with desire.”
“To try to write love is to confront the muck of language: that “Other countries drink to get drunk, and this is accepted by everyone; region of hysteria in France, drunkenness is a consequence, never an intention. A drink where language is felt as the spinning out of a pleasure, not as the necessary cause is both too much of an effect which is sought: wine is not only a philter, it is also the leisurely act of drinking.” and too little, n: I rub my language excessive and t is as if I had words impoverished.” or fingers “Language at the tip is a skin: I rub my language against the other. It is as if I had words anguage trembles “Literature is the question minus the answer.” instead of fingers, or fingers at the tip of my words. My language trembles nd this is accepted by everyone; desire.” A drink nce, never with an intention.
his own devices, forms an idea about what ge which is very far from the truth.
to get drunk, e,untries not asdrink the necessary causeand this is accepted by everyone; is aitconsequence, otdrunkenness only a philter, is also the never an intention. A drink he spinning out of a pleasure, not as the necessary cause ct which is sought: wine is not only a philter, it is also the act of drinking.” “Literature is the question minus the answer.”
ut what “Literature is the question minus the answer.” rms an idea about what r from the truth.
and eventually and eventually they could not fail to
they could not fail to
These are photocopies of different sections of the same piece of work. The I chose to photocopies them instead of scanning them onto the computer straight away because I want to bring the sketchy quality to it. The work itself was two pieces of work layer on top of each othe, with the cut out on the top. Admittely, it is easier to do it on the computer, but simply cutting and paste on top another piece of work, it makes it harder to read and gives a 3 dimentional quality and textures