Issuu on Google+

COMENIUS PROJECT Evaluation of first year 2011-2012


Participants: 75 Your country is:

Turkey

0

0%

Bulgaria

17

23%

Croatia

6

8%

Italy

22

30%

Poland

13

18%

Romania

8

11%

Spain

8

11%

UK

0

0%


1. Has the Project helped you to acquire intercultural knowledge? yes

72

96%

no

3

4%


2. Was the mobility of students and teachers encouraged? yes

71

95%

no

4

5%


3. Did the ties between schools increase?

yes

63

84%

no

12

16%


4. Did the knowledge of foreign languages improve? yes

70

93%

no

5

7%


5. Was the use of Information Communication Technologies ( ICT) encouraged? yes

67

89%

no

8

11%


6. Pedagogically the Project was: 6.1. Motivating for students and teachers yes

70

93%

no

5

7%

6.2. Encouraging the cooperation between students and teachers yes

71

95%

no

4

5%

yes

65

87%

no

10

13%

6.3. Innovative


7. The Project was beneficial to: 7.1 The school:

7.2. The students: 7.3. The teachers: 7.4. The educational system:


8. Can the final products ( small enterprise) for the first year be considered as satisfactory ? yes

54

72%

no

22

29%


9. Have funds been well distributed? yes

63

84%

no

13

17%

10. Have you found new ways of getting more funds? yes

29

39%

no

48

64%


11. Have other people contribute to the project? 11.1. Parents 11.2. School non-teaching staff

11.3. Local authorities

11.4. Local business

11.5. Other institutions


12. Are you going to participate in the project in the future? yes

67

91%

no

7

9%


13. About the aims: Has it been fulfilled? 1. Motivate towards the other languages learning: yes

68

91%

no

7

9%

2. Enhance the use of new technologies?

yes

62

83%

no

13

17%

3. Increase the feeling of European Citizenship? yes

66

88%

no

9

12%


13. About the aims: 4. Break down prejudices of the participant countries? yes

70

93%

no

5

7%

5. Improve the teaching practice?: yes

56

75%

no

19

25%

6. Promote equality between sexes and cultures? yes

63

84%

no

12

16%


14. Were you aware of the Project objectives? low

7

9%

average

36

48%

high

35

47%


. Things to improve: • The role of the main coordinator. • The main coordinator has to be more active and has to lead the project in every moment. It is his part to open the site of the project. • Everything was pretty interesting. • The number of students taking active part in the project can be increases • It's difficult to organize everything for 8 countries, so we think there is nothing to improve. • Partners to cooperate more, not only during meetings – • Everyone to work on the project blog – • To be more active The participation of students. • Everything is all right longer international meeting for example: meeting longer ...


Difficulties • •

• • • •

The site of the project. It isn't opened, yet.None specifically. It has been the first time in a Comenius project for our team, but we got over the difficulties with the help and cooperation of our partners. technical, bearaucratic - but it does not depend on ushard cooperation Difficulty in foreigner language nothing rather not was complicate to find students with the right profile to participate in the project. Students must be encouraged to take part in the project. Those who take part should welcome guests students and parents are not very willing - due to accommodating conditions. Besid...


.Suggestions: • • • • • •

• • • • •

We have to be more active in Project implementation.Nothing comes to my mind. To set clear objectives for the second year of the projectbe patient with difficulties - project is mostly for the students, not teachers to be more active and more understanding Working with translators that allow the participation of more students and teachers without expertise in foreign languages​​.. Thanks to all Participants. The best would be to simplify procedures .Nothing :) Creating a joint product of the activities of the project pryorite. -to set limits on the time of the presentation...


First year evaluation report