Issuu on Google+

AIESEC RUSSIA 2010 STATISTICS REPORT January - December

2010 MoS results achieved Exchange Members Leaders X+L Entities

1123 1756 276 44 31


Global Ranking Exchange Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

GN AP CEE AP CEE CEE IGN CEE AP AP AP

Country INDIA TURKEY MAINLAND CHINA RUSSIA POLAND BRAZIL UKRAINE INDONESIA MALAYSIA PHILIPPINES

TN RE 2391 1157 891 653 651 549 487 411 354 325

Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

GN AP IGN CEE AP WENA CEE CEE WENA IGN AP

Country MAINLAND CHINA BRAZIL POLAND INDIA UNITED STATES RUSSIA UKRAINE GERMANY COLOMBIA JAPAN

EP RE 1567 846 768 634 470 470 444 426 385 370

Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

GN AP AP CEE IGN CEE CEE CEE WENA AP IGN

Country INDIA MAINLAND CHINA POLAND BRAZIL TURKEY RUSSIA UKRAINE GERMANY INDONESIA COLOMBIA

X RE 3025 2458 1419 1395 1389 1123 931 733 622 566

We have finished 2010 being #4 globally in TN side, #6 in EP side and #6 totally with 1123 exchanges realized going after India, China, Poland, Brazil and Turkey. Our last year competitor Ukraine left far behind with 931 exchanges realized. By absolute country ranking Russia is #5 with absolute growth of 599 exchanges compared to previous year. By relative growth we are #24 globally with the growth of 114%. As for the LC ranking, congratulations to SPUEF and Moscow for being #14 and #19 globally, looking forward to see more Russian LCs in TOP 20, and even TOP 10 ranking among the Local Committees worldwide.


National Ranking TN

EP

LC SPUEF Moscow E&G Ufa Samara NSTU NSU Chelyabinsk Saratov Krasnoyarsk Izhevsk Omsk Tomsk Kaliningrad Kazan N. Chelny Khabarovsk Togliatti Perm Volgograd SSTU MC Total

2010 goal 201 248 114 151 152 117 165 57 65 33 37 32 30 15 30 25

TN Re 143 80 82 66 68 34 33 34 29 15 10 17 18 6 7 6 3

GAP 58 168 32 85 84 83 132 23 36 18 27 15 12 9 23 19

% of plan 2010 goal EP re 71% 174 32% 143 72% 96 44% 92 45% 20 29% 146 20% 40 60% 37 45% 40 45% 37 27% 25 53% 33 60% 25 40% 25 23% 25 24% 40

GAP 66 97 63 33 16 48 26 23 13 18 19 11 3 12 7 5 7

108 46 33 59 4 98 14 14 27 19 6 22 22 13 18 35

% of plan 2010 goal 38% 375 68% 391 66% 210 36% 243 80% 172 33% 263 65% 205 62% 94 33% 105 49% 70 76% 62 33% 65 12% 55 48% 40 28% 55 13% 65

-3 2

1 1 1472

653

-1 820

44%

998

1 470

-1 538

47%

2470

Total Exchange realized GAP % of plan 209 166 56% 177 214 45% 145 65 69% 99 144 41% 84 88 49% 82 181 31% 59 146 29% 57 37 61% 42 63 40% 33 37 47% 29 33 47% 28 37 43% 21 34 38% 18 22 45% 14 41 25% 11 54 17% 7 3 2 1 1 -1 1 1123 1358 45%

Congratulations LC SPUEF for being #1 Local Committee in Russia with absolute exchange realization 209! Only 3 LCs crossed the line of 100 exchanges in the last year – SPUEF, Moscow and E&G. Hopefully this year there will be new heights for each LC in Russia. Highest plan realization reached E&G with 69% of plan realization.


Relative and absolute growth 2009 67 59 47 58 25 64 38 37 21 6 25 20 0 22 13 14 0 0 0 0 0 8 516

2010 Rel.growth Abs.growth 209 212% 142 177 200% 118 145 209% 98 99 71% 41 84 236% 59 82 28% 18 59 55% 21 57 54% 20 42 100% 21 33 450% 27 29 16% 4 28 40% 8 21 2100% 21 18 -18% -4 14 8% 1 11 -21% -3 7 700% 7 3 300% 3 2 200% 2 1 100% 1 1 100% 1 1 -88% -7 1123 118% 607

Exchange growth by LCs 250 200 150 100

2009 2010

50

0 SPUEF Moscow E&G Ufa Samara NSTU NSU Chelyabinsk Saratov Krasnoyarsk Izhevsk Omsk Tomsk Kaliningrad Kazan Nab.Chelny Khabarovsk Togliatti Perm SSTU Volgograd MC

LC SPUEF Moscow E&G Ufa Samara NSTU NSU Chelyabinsk Saratov Krasnoyarsk Izhevsk Omsk Tomsk Kaliningrad Kazan Nab.Chelny Khabarovsk Togliatti Perm SSTU Volgograd MC Total

By relative growth in exchange highest number has LC Krasnoyarsk with 450% and a good start had LC Tomsk going from 0 to 21 exchanges. In absolute numbers SPUEF and Moscow are leading the ranking nationally.


ICX

Realization by pools LC SPUEF E&G Moscow Samara Ufa Chelyabinsk NSTU NSU Saratov Tomsk Omsk Krasnoyarsk Izhevsk Kazan N. Chelny Kaliningrad Togliatti Volgograd SSTU Total

DT 135 78 71 66 62 21 33 17 29 18 12 12 7 7 5 5 3 1 1 583

ET

MT 4 2 6 1 3 13 1 2

5 1 2

TT 4 2 3 1 1

14

2

1 1

41

28

Total 143 82 80 68 66 34 34 33 29 18 17 15 1 10 7 6 6 3 1 1 1 653

ICX POOLS DISTRIBUTION 0% 6%

5% DT ET MT TT 89%

In ICX the leading LC is SPUEF with 143 realizations. Biggest amount of corporate exchanges has reached LC NSU – 14 MT TN realized in 2010. As for the pool distribution still there is a prevalence of DT internships – 89% of whole ICX in Russia.


ICX

DIVERSITY

COUNTRY BRAZIL CHINA, MAINLAND INDIA POLAND TURKEY UKRAINE TAIWAN UNITED STATES INDONESIA SLOVAKIA EGYPT ITALY BULGARIA ROMANIA COLOMBIA JAPAN SERBIA UNITED KINGDOM SINGAPORE GERMANY

DT 92 75 66 41 27 30 23 8 17 16 16 14 15 12 10 10 9 8 9 9

ET

MT

2 5 13 1 2

8

TT 2 2

12 1

2 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 2

Total 96 1 83 79 54 30 30 23 18 18 17 16 15 15 13 11 11 10 10 9 9

COUNTRIES DIVERSITY

1%

1% 2% 2%

13%

15%

2%

2% 13%

2% 2% 2% 2%

12%

3% 3% 3%

4% 5%

5%

8%

BRAZIL CHINA, MAINLAND INDIA POLAND TURKEY UKRAINE TAIWAN UNITED STATES INDONESIA SLOVAKIA EGYPT ITALY BULGARIA ROMANIA COLOMBIA JAPAN SERBIA UNITED KINGDOM SINGAPORE GERMANY OTHERS

There is a huge diversity of countries interns come to Russia from. You can see here just TOP 20 countries split by pools. The TOP EP provider for Russia last year was Brazil with 96 exchanges realized. Afterwards goes China and India. BRIC relevance is seen as never. We grew a lot with Poland, Turkey and Ukraine – our CEE neighbors.


DIVERSITY

EP LC DT CHANDIGARH 23 CAMPINAS 14 WROCLAW UE 13 SYSU 13 DELHI IIT 9 GDUFS 12 PKU 8 NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY 10 UNDIP 9 PORTO ALEGRE 9 BURSA 7 SANTA MARIA 8 KRAKOW 6 AAST IN CAIRO 7 BLAGOEVGRAD 7 ESPM 7 BUCURESTI 7 SZCZECIN 5 BRATISLAVA 7 IVANO-FRANKIVSK 7

ET MT 10

TT

1 3 1

1

1 1

2

Total 33 14 14 13 12 12 1 11 10 9 9 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

TOP 20 EP providing LCs 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 CHANDIGARH CAMPINAS WROCLAW UE SYSU DELHI IIT GDUFS PKU NTU UNDIP PORTO ALEGRE BURSA SANTA MARIA KRAKOW AAST IN CAIRO BLAGOEVGRAD ESPM BUCURESTI SZCZECIN BRATISLAVA IVANO-FRANKIVSK

ICX

We have TOP EP providing LCs from diverse countries: India, Brazil, Poland, Mainland China, Indonesia, Taiwan, Turkey etc. A lot of realizations with Chandigarh and Campinas came through LC2LC cooperations (e.g. Moscow, Ufa) – it means this is one of the key growth points for realization in this year


ICX

ICX Non-Corporate

Exchange result

ET ICX DYNAMICS 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

REALIZED

9

8

12

21

41

MATCHED

11

7

16

26

37

RAISED

4

5

23

30

50

Our growth in DT was 274% more than in a previous year! Amazing growth. 3 peaks out of 5 planned already passed and all of them happened though with a lower realization than we have planned


ICX

ICX Corporate

Global Ranking CICX Ranking

CEE Ranking CICX Country

TN RE

1 INDIA 2 GERMANY

726

3 BRAZIL 4 TURKEY

170

5 POLAND 6 CHINA, MAINLAND

164

7 NETHERLANDS 8 BELGIUM

Ranking

Country

TN RE

1 TURKEY 2 POLAND

305

168 164

3 HUNGARY 4 CZECH REPUBLIC

77

5 TUNISIA 6 SLOVAKIA

45

141 108

7 RUSSIAN FEDERATION

29

168

63 37

87

9 JAPAN 10 HUNGARY

78

30 RUSSIAN FEDERATION

29

77

The missing point to bring Russia on the top in the categories we still need to work on our corporate exchange Realized and raised corporate TNs in 2010

Raised and realized TNs by pools

80

Realized

Raised

73

70 60 50 40

34 29

30

TT

TT

M T

M T

RA 28 25

20

29

26 19

10

14

RE

9

0

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

We grew in number of raised TN forms but due low activity in corporate matching we haven’t been able to turn the raised TN forms into realized. The highest number of realized corporate TN forms (36) still belongs to 2005 year.


ICX

ICX Corporate

Available and realized TNs by LC 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0

Available Realized

Due above mentioned reasons only 4 of our 16 LCs could realize corporate ICX during 2010. Sadly many of LCs that are providing top results in DT ICX are not delivering any results in corporate pools. On the other hand we can see that to raise TNs is becoming easy even in very short time as it proved for example Engec-Guap LC in the autumn of 2010. Raising peaks corporate TNs

30 25 Average 20062010

20 15

2010

10 5

Dec

Nov

Oct

Sept

Aug

Jul

Jun

May

Apr

Mar

Feb

Jan

0

20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0

Average 20062010 2010

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

Realization peaks in corporate TNs


ICX

ICX Corporate

Top 10 Backgrounds Most Demanded by TN Takers MT International Marketing

TT 18 Software Development and Programming

9

Advertising + Public Relations Retail + Sales Marketing

13 Web development and management 12 Systems analysis and design

9 6

Market Evaluation and Research Project Management

10 Database management 10 Network management & data transmission

5 5

Import - Export Product Planning, Development & Control Introductory Marketing Consumer + Buyer Behaviour Introductory HR management

9 8 7 6 4

Project Management Introductory Engineering Introductory Education Training and development Advertising + Public Relations

4 3 2 2 1

Rejected vs. realized corporate TNs in years 83

Available corporate TNs

80

0

0 Omsk

2010

0

Tomsk

2009

0

Kazan

2008

1

Nab Chelny

2007

1

Togliatti

2006

2

NSTU

0

1

Saratov

9

10

1

4

Samara

20

Realized

1

EG

24

0

2

Chelyabinsk

25

31 28

30

6

Krasnoyarsk

30

28

6

4

NSU

40

Rejected

Ufa

53

50

11

Izhevsk

60

12 10 8 6 4 2 0

Kaliningrad

61

Spuef

70

Moscow

90

From 2006 till 2010 we register in total 225 MT and 33 TT rejected TNs. Now the only question is whether we manage to match and realize our currently available forms and make the real historical breakthrough or we just end up putting them on rejected status as it was happening long years of Russian corporate history.


OGX

Realization by pools LC Moscow SPUEF E&G NSTU Ufa NSU Chelyabinsk Izhevsk Krasnoyarsk Samara Saratov Kaliningrad Omsk Kazan Khabarovsk Nab. Chelny Tomsk Perm MC Total

EP Re 97 66 63 48 33 26 23 19 18 16 13 12 11 7 7 5 3 2 1 470

LC Moscow SPUEF E&G Ufa Krasnoyarsk NSTU Samara Saratov Izhevsk Kaliningrad NSU Chelyabinsk Khabarovsk Omsk Perm Kazan Chelny Total

DT 54 38 26 17 15 12 8 6 6 5 5 5 4 2 2 2 2 209

LC Moscow NSTU E&G Omsk Ufa Izhevsk Chelyabinsk SPUEF Samara Krasnoyarsk Kaliningrad NSU Chelny Saratov Tomsk Total

ET 7 7 6 6 5 5 5 4 4 3 2 2 1 1 1 59

LC Moscow E&G NSTU SPUEF NSU Chelyabinsk Izhevsk Saratov Ufa Samara Kazan Kaliningrad Khabarovsk Omsk Chelny MC Total

MT 34 28 26 19 19 12 8 5 5 4 4 3 3 3 2 1 176

LC Ufa SPUEF NSTU E&G Tomsk Kaliningrad Moscow Chelyabinsk Saratov Kazan Total

TT 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 26

In OGX the absolute leader is LC Moscow with 97 EPs realized in 2010. Good dynamics has SPUEF and E&G, being along with Moscow one of the TOP DT EP providers in Russia. Ufa is first in TT EP realizations having 6 EPs last year. Totally we reached 470 OGX realizations.


OGX DIVERSITY Main DT partners TURKEY INDIA CHINA POLAND SERBIA INDONESIA ITALY BRAZIL TAIWAN MALAYSIA

46 42 29 9 8 8 7 6 5 5

Main ET partners INDIA 12 CHINA 11 POLAND 10 TURKEY 9 COLOMBIA 7

Main MT partners INDIA TURKEY GERMANY CHINA, MAINLAND POLAND FRANCE CROATIA AUSTRIA BRAZIL ITALY

45 19 17 11 10 6 5 5 5 4

Main TT partners INDIA 11 SWEDEN 2 BRAZIL 2

India is our absolute leading TN taker. In TOP partners there are also Turkey, China, Germany, Poland.

Eps Re by pools 250

209

200

176

150 100

Eps Re 59

50

26

0 ET

DT

MT

TT

First time in our history we have DT pool realization bigger than MT. Congratulations to the whole country with that level up achievement! 209 DT internships realized in 2010! Still we are one of the TOP providers of qualified MT EPs worldwide.


Members | Leaders | X+L Plan realization

Members growth by years

3500

Membership

3000

3000 2500

1759

2000

Goal

1500

Re

1000 500

101 44

304 276

0 X+L

Leadership opportunities

Membership

1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

1312

822

180

2006

Membership Growth Factors: Growth in scale of operations leads to growth in membership and big scale recruitments. % of members in region correlate with X results

Global Ranking by Members completing leadership experience

300

Membership

350

59% growth! 2007

2008

2009

2010


Members | Leaders | X+L

Membership distribution by regions 60% 50%

% of members per region

49% 46%

40% 30% 28%

30%

% of X in region

26% 21%

26% 46%

% of members per region

20% 10%

28%

0% West

Center

East

West

Centre

East

Membership (with EPs) 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0

3600 2984

2680

2650 1966

1877

1759

1578

Leadership Role Growth Factors: • The leadership roles have becoming one of the most important experiences we provide and continued rapid growth. • Operations has increased, so more leaders are needed to manage it on the ground. • More applicants per full time leadership role than in the past. More people striving for prominent roles.


Members | Leaders | X+L

Leadership role assignments 2009 Q4

110

150% growth!

2010 Q4

leadership role assignments

44

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

We have experienced a speeded up growth in Q4 2010 compared with the previous quarter. 1. More leadership roles are provided both to general membership and exchange participants. Thus we have successfully increased the ratio of members who can have leadership experiences. 2. Step to short term leadership roles in 2010 to increase number of leadership XP generated by AIESEC Russia


Members | Leaders | X+L

X+L ranking nationally Entity 2009 2010 Growth X after L L after X AIESEC SPUEF 0 6 600% 4 2 AIESEC CHELYABINSK 3 5 67% 4 1 AIESEC MOSCOW 1 5 400% 3 2 AIESEC SARATOV 0 4 400% 3 1 AIESEC IZHEVSK 1 4 300% 4 0 AIESEC NSU 1 4 300% 4 0 AIESEC OMSK 4 3 -25% 2 1 AIESEC ENGEC-GAAP 2 2 0% 2 0 AIESEC NSTU 3 2 -33% 2 0 AIESEC KRASNOYARSK 0 2 100% 2 0 AIESEC UFA 2 2 0% 2 0 AIESEC KAZAN 0 1 100% 1 0 AIESEC SAMARA 0 1 100% 0 1 AIESEC KALININGRAD 3 1 -67% 0 1 AIESEC NABEREZHNYIE CHELNY1 1 0% 1 0 MC 0 1 100% 1 0 Total 21 44 110% 35 9

X+L growth came from 1. X after L initiatives for Alumni and current EB and OCP members. 2. Returnees involvement for leadership positions

X+L growth 50 40

91% growth! 30 20 10

0 Q1

Q2

Q3 X+L (2009)

Q4 X+L (2010)

Total


THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

SEE YOU AT THE NEXT LEVEL!


Russia 2010 report