Page 1

Conclusion:

Nuclear energy has a lot of upside because of the enormous amounts of energy that it produces; however production of temporary energy, through the fission process isn't worth the damage that it poses to the future. Inadequate storage facilities, extremely high cost,, and questionable transportation methods all add to the potential of a nuclear disaster. Currently, 15% of all generated energy annually is from nuclear power. As of 2008, 430 nuclear plants are spread between 31 countries. However, no individual country has perfected the strategy for handling the potential nuclear problems.

Sources Siegel, Jeff. "The Downside of Nuclear Energy." What Washington Won't Tell You About 100 Nuclear Power Plants (2009): 1. Green Chip Stocks. Web. <http://http://www.greenchipstocks.com/articles/n

The Destruction of the Earth: Nuclear Waste

uclear+power-washington-uranium/392>. Passero, Barbara. Energy Alternatives. Farmington Hills, Mich.: Greenhaven, 2006. Print. World Nuclear Association. "Nuclear Power in." World Nuclear Association . June 2001. Web. 7 May 2010. <http://http://www.worldnuclear.org/education/whyu.htm>. http://www.worldnuclear.org/education/graphics/wast1.gif http://www.windenergyplanning.com/wordpress/w p-content/uploads/2009/02/nuclear-waste.jpg http://www.atomicarchive.com/History/coldwar/im ages/chernobyl.jpg "Nuclear Power Education - Cost of Nuclear Power." Nuclear Power Education - About This Site. The University of Melbourne, 2010. Web. 07 May 2010. <http://nuclearinfo.net/Nuclearpower/WebHomeC ostOfNuclearPower "Energy Information Administration." EIA. US Energy Information Administration. Web. 7 May 2010. <http://http://www.eia.doe.gov/fuelnuclear.html>.

DON'T LET OUR COMMUNITY ADD TO THE NUCLEAR ENERGY PROBLEM!


rhyanpdf  

gloabl issues project

Advertisement
Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you