Page 12

CONNECTING POINT

THE PRESIDENT’S TASK FORCE REPORT — A WISH LIST OR JUST WISHFUL THINKING? BY ANITA PURSLEY

O

n December 4, 2018, the US Treasury Department issued its much-anticipated report from the President’s Task Force on the United States Postal Service. The report, titled United States Postal Service: A Sustainable Path Forward, has since received a myriad of reviews, most of which are negative. Many mailing industry association executives are viewing the report as a “disaster,” a “disappointment,” or “an opportunity lost.” The optimistic hope was that the Task Force would come up with a comprehensive strategy that included fresh ideas that could enhance or align with existing legislative proposals that would result in meaningful reform. My initial reaction was that the report appeared to be a mixed bag of ideas that didn’t seem to have a connective thread other than the overarching viewpoint that the USPS is facing financial challenges as it tries to maintain a universal service obligation, however that is defined. The report basically consists of three categories: recommendations worth exploring, those that would have huge ramifications for the mailing industry, and those that are (what I believe to be) non-starters. Please note this is not an all-inclusive list. 12

JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2019 | MailingSystemsTechnology.com

Recommendations Worth Pursuing The Universal Service Obligation (USO) must be clearly defined. What may surprise some readers is that the USO is not explicitly defined in statute and is interpreted similarly but loosely by stakeholders in the mailing industry. Most would agree that the USO is understood to be an obligation of the Postal Service to provide affordable, quality postal services throughout the United States, six days a week. The report points out that the USO is subject to interpretation. Imagine a public corporation without a clear mission statement! The USPS suffers from a lack of institutional governance, both in authority and in practice, and there is an immediate need for the US Senate to confirm Governors. It is good that the Task Force recognizes this need and will hopefully ignite Congress to act upon the two nominees put forward by the Administration in late 2018. Additionally, terms of both new Governors must be acted upon. Governor Duncan is serving the remainder of a seven-year term that expired December 8, 2018. Although he is nominated to serve another seven-year term, he must still be confirmed by the full Senate. Duncan is

technically in a “hold-over” year so there is no disruption in service if he is reconfirmed before December 2019. Governor Williams is serving the remainder of a seven-year term expiring December 8, 2019. He too, must be reconfirmed. Despite the mail monopoly, the end-to-end mail value chain (origination, pickup/collection, processing, transportation, and delivery) is divisible and has many suppliers and competitors. To achieve more cost efficiencies, the USPS should expand third-party relationships. The Task Force is advocating more public-private partnerships, such as worksharing. Many mailing service providers will support this recommendation and actively pursue opportunities. Recommendations That Could Have Huge Ramifications Distinguish between the types of mail and packages that represent an essential service and those that are non-essential. When defining the USO, the Task Force believes the most important aspect is to distinguish between the types of mail and packages that represent an essential service and those that are non-essential. The idea here is to price non-essential services higher to fund the USO. Currently, the Postal Service categorizes products by type (market dominant or competitive) rather than purpose. This recommendation proposes that mail classes should be redefined by creating products that are defined by the type of sender and the purpose (e.g., correspondence, transaction mail) of the mail item. Essential services products are not clearly defined except that they include all “personal correspondence (person-to-person mail), transaction mail (bills, financial statements, product recall notices), government mail (election and tax related mail), parcels containing pharmaceuticals, and parcels sent from consumer to consumer.” These products would have monopoly protection and fall under a price cap regime with mandated delivery standards. Non-essential services would include Marketing Mail, advertising mail within First-Class, and packages that are commercial in nature (e-commerce B2C packages, B2B packages, etc.). If a First-Class transactional piece includes advertising (known as transpromo), it is

Profile for RB Publishing

Mailing Systems Technology Jan/Feb 2019  

Mailing Systems Technology Jan/Feb 2019

Mailing Systems Technology Jan/Feb 2019  

Mailing Systems Technology Jan/Feb 2019