Page 1

Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain TRA’s General Director Participates at the Global Symposium of Regulators

NEWSLETTER Issue: 02 | March 2014


05 Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain

05 Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain P.O. Box 10353 Manama. Kingdom of Bahrain Tel: 520000 17 973+ Fax: 532125 17 973+ Consumer Line: 81188 e-mail: contact@tra.org.bh Website: www.tra.bh

CONTENTS

05

Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain

04 06 08

Competition and a sound

03

ITU World Telecom Forum 2012 TRA Hosts a Workshop on IPv6

2

page TRA Newsletter

March 2014

Competition and a sound regulatory framework


MESSAGE

Dr Mohammed A.AL-Amer President

In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended.The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended.The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution

TRA Newsletter

March 2014

3


ACHIEVEMENTS

Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended.The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which

Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain

4

In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended. The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got.

Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended.The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which

page TRA Newsletter

March 2014


Competition and a sound regulatory

AWARDS

In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended.The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process;.

Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended.The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which.

Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended.The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA Newsletter

March 2014

5


COVER STORY Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain

6

page TRA Newsletter

March 2014


In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended. The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended. The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended.The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order

TRA Newsletter

number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended. The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment.

TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which.

TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which.

March 2014

7

TRA newsletter mock-up V1  
Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you