seeking the path
[Curiosity is everywhere and nowhere. This mode of Beingin-the-world reveals a new kind of Being of everyday Dasein—a kind in which Dasein is constantly uprooted.]: The antithesis of Repetition. ‘Whoever wills repetition proves himself to be in possession of a pathos that is serious and mature.’—Kierkegaard, Repetition.47 p. 220/34 [would]: read ‘should’ p. 222/10, 13, 14, 17, 26, 30, and passim, [tranquillity] [tranquillizing] [tranquillization] and [tranquillized] read: complacency, complacification, etc. p. 223/16-19 [Since the understanding is thus constantly torn away from authenticity and into the “they” (though always with a sham of authenticity), the movement of falling is characterized by turbulence.]: A vicious spiral? p. 226/10 [would] c/o: should. p. 228/10-12 [Entities are, quite independently of the experience by which they are disclosed, the acquaintance in which they are discovered, and the grasping in which their nature is ascertained.]: See note, p. 101. p. 250/17-19 [Shrinking back in the face of what fear discloses—in the face of something threatening—is founded upon fear; and this shrinking back has the character of fleeing.] ‘this’ u/l. p. 231/5-13 [That in the face of which one is anxious is completely indefinite. Not only does this indefiniteness leave factically undecided which entity within-the-world is threatening what is said; when, for example, a man says that Frederick the Sixth was an Emperor of China, we answer that this is a lie. But when a man speaks about death, and of how he has thought it and conceived its uncertainty, and so forth, it does not follow that he has really done so. Quite so. But there is a more artistic way of finding out whether he lies or not. Merely let him speak: if he is a deceiver, he will contradict himself precisely when he is engaged in offering the most solemn assurances. The contradiction will not be a direct one, but consists in the failure of the speech to include a consciousness of what the speech professes directly to assert. Objectively the assertion may be quite straight-forward; the man’s only fault is that he speaks by rote. That he also perspires and pounds the table with his fists, is not proof that he does not merely patter; it only goes to show that he is very stupid, or else that he has a secret consciousness that he is guilty of ranting. For it is exceedingly stupid to think that reciting something by rote could properly stir the emotions: since the emotion is the internal, while ranting is something external, like making water… 47. Kierkegaard’s text is misquoted. It actually reads: ‘Repetition is reality, and it is the seriousness of life. He who wills repetition is matured in seriousness.’
Published on Jun 26, 2013
Part B includes two early essays (Nibbana and Anatta and Sketch for a Proof of Rebirth) as well as notes from a Commonplace Book and Margina...