work.
Presentation Marking Criteria: Academic Level 6 continued ‌ Weighting 65% 35% Descriptors Relevant Application of Level of Level of knowledge and theory to analysis investigation understanding practice and use of supporting Grade (If relevant) evidence Assessment No application of Work is a No evidence of 1-9%
(Fail)
0%
outcomes are not met. No knowledge of understanding of key issues.
theory to practice.
descriptive narrative.
reading to inform approach.
group dynamics or awareness of time.
Structure and organisation of presentation No structure or organisation. No use of materials. Incoherent communication. No management of group dynamics or awareness of time.
Failure to present without prior permission granted. Evidence of academic malpractice as defined by Institutional Policy. Major breach of confidentiality as defined by Course Regulations. Evidence of unsafe/harmful or discriminatory practice or presentation of misinformation.
NB: Criteria and weightings are open to some degree of professional interpretation. Where a student demonstrates strengths and weaknesses, which cross the identified grade criteria, the marker will be required to exercise a balanced judgement. All work submitted is expected to adhere to guidance regarding the recommended wordage. Failure to do so is likely to influence the final grade awarded.
45 KFA/July2011