Pampa MTSS Handbook

Page 1


Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Handbook

2025-2026

Mission: The Mission of Pampa ISD is to produce learners who are compassionate, competent, confident, and future-ready!

Our Vision: Pampa ISD students are courageous innovators utilizing their own unique abilities to invest in their world.

Purpose Statement: If the CLT creates a system of support for behavior, mental health, and academic needs, while intentionally collaborating with all stakeholders, then Pampa ISD students will be able to learn at high levels in a safe environment.

Table of Contents

STRATEGICDESIGNFRAMEWORK

OurMission

OurVision

MTSS Purpose Statement

OurBeliefs

RTI vs MTSS

Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)

WHYMTSS?

DemystifyingMTSS

WhatisMTSS?

WhatMTSSisnot?

TIER/TEAMTSSOverview

Tier 1 UNIVERSAL

InstructionalDelivery

Tier 2 TARGETED

Tier 3–INTENSIVE

MTSS Team Workflow

MeetingsandMTSSTeamMeetingGuide

InterventionImplementation

EvaluatingStudentProgress

TierMovement

DataAnalysis

DecisionMaking

Assessments

Progress Monitoring

Schedule for Universal Screeners and Progress Monitoring

Behavior

MTSS’sRelationshipwithOtherPrograms

MTSSandSpecialEducation

ConsiderationsforMTSSSupportofEmergentBilinguals

MTSS and GT

MTSSandParent/CaregiverCommunication

Example of Goals

Guidance For MTSS Tier Support and Meetings

Tier 1 Guidance

Tier 2 Guidance

Tier 3 Guidance

Campus Timeline for MTSS Actions

STRATEGIC DESIGN FRAMEWORK

Our Mission

The Mission of Pampa ISD is to produce learners who are compassionate, competent, confident, and future-ready!

Our Vision

Pampa ISD students are courageous innovators utilizing their unique abilities to invest in their world

MTSS Purpose Statement

If the CLT creates a system of support for behavior, mental health, and academic needs while intentionally collaborating with all stakeholders, then Pampa ISD students will be able to learn at high levels in a safe environment

Our Beliefs

We believe...

● Each student deserves a classroom with high-quality instruction where they learn how to learn in a way that sets them up for lifelong success.

● Early childhood education provides a strong foundation for future success

● All students deserve experiences that spark their unique interests and passions in order to define their successful futures.

● Strong relationships between all members of the community are critical to student success

● In the value of learning from failure and overcoming struggles in order to become perseverant

● The community that takes radical responsibility for developing, supporting, and encouraging students creates an environment for continued success

● In educating the whole child

RTI vs MTSS

MTSS encourages educators to examine district, campus, and classroom culture and systems by reviewing and analyzing data for all students The analysis identifies students who require additional support, such as intervention, enrichment, social-emotional support, and behavioral support, to maximize their potential

RTI

Students:

Students identified as “at risk” or being considered for special education evaluation

MTSS

All students, including those already served by programs such as 504, Special Education/Dyslexia, ESL/Bilingual, etc

Supports: Academic Academic, Behavioral, Social-Emotional

Purpose: Remediation and Intervention Prevention, Differentiation, Intervention, and Enrichment

Focus: Isolated- academic needs are discussed in isolation Integrated- academic, behavioral, and social-emotional needs are discussed together. The whole child is considered.

Collaboration: Teachers of at-risk students, special education teachers, and campus administrators

All campus staff and district staff

Campus Management: A campus administrator(s) Teachers, grade level/content teams (PLC), and an MTSS Campus Team

Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)

WHY MTSS?

The purpose of MTSS is to engage in a continuous cycle of problem-solving based on data to provide immediate support when student growth is not as predicted When effective, MTSS reduces the need for more restrictive educational placements for many students by intervening early For students performing below grade level, effective intervention that accelerates learning and results in movement to less intensive tiers is the ultimate goal, when appropriate to the needs of each student It is creating a system where all students are served through one system with a continuum of support All school staff (teachers, administrators, counselors, social workers, interventionists, specialists, etc ) should work together to implement the MTSS framework for the benefit of all students on campus

Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) is a whole-child approach that integrates academic, behavioral, and social-emotional instruction and support. MTSS optimizes student growth through a proactive, preventative framework composed of multiple layers, or tiers, aligned to the varying needs of our students Tier 1 effective school-wide systems and differentiated core instruction, Tier 2 targeted intervention, and Tier 3 intense and individualized intervention form the pillars of this integrated continuum of student supports (Buffom, Mattos, & Weber, 2010)

Demystifying MTSS

What is MTSS?

MTSS is an umbrella term for a structured, multi-tiered system of support that includes the following:

● Core instruction meets the needs of 80% of students

● The use of valid and reliable universal screeners for all students, used to help identify those at risk and also to provide differentiation to diverse learners (during core instruction)

● The creation of student support plans based upon multiple sources of data and key indicators of success

● The implementation of regular problem-solving meetings to conduct progress monitoring of student data

● Adjustments are made to the intervention plan of support, based on data

What MTSS is not?

● A single response or an intervention program (It IS a system that includes responses and interventions, among other elements )

● Only for students at risk. (It IS for all staff and students and takes into account academic and emotional support, teacher preparedness, and school culture )

● Only for one school point person to facilitate (It IS for multi-disciplinary problem-solving teams to be created and meet regularly.)

● Based on single points of data (It DOES rely upon the equitable use of multiple data points to make decisions about levels of support needed, and the effect supports/interventions are having on remediating or enriching student learning )

● Only for students at risk academically. (It IS for all students and incorporates academics, social-emotional wellness, attendance monitoring, enrichment & differentiation for diverse learners, and family/community engagement

Universal intervention, also referred to as Tier 1 or primary prevention, is a systematic approach for supporting all students schoolwide Universal intervention occurs in the general education classroom and is designed for all students to participate It includes evidence-based practices, research-based curricula, differentiation, scaffolded instruction, and universal learning design. Universal intervention alone meets the needs of about 80% of a school’s population for both academics and behavior

Targeted intervention, often referred to as Tier 2 or secondary prevention, is designed for students experiencing difficulty in academics or behavior Targeted intervention can occur in many different settings inside or outside of the general education classroom with small groups of students Students receiving targeted intervention should continue to receive universal intervention

Typically, about 20% of students require targeted intervention This is a small percentage of students in a school If many students need targeted intervention, the school needs to evaluate its universal intervention. Intensive intervention, often called Tier 3 or tertiary prevention, is designed for students who demonstrate inadequate response to universal and targeted intervention Intensive intervention may occur within or outside of special education Schools have different ways of conceptualizing and implementing intensive intervention.

Intensive intervention, called Tier 3, is needed for a much smaller number of students, typically about 5% or less.

Tier 1—UNIVERSAL

Tier 1 is the least intensive level of the MTSS framework and typically includes the district-approved high-quality instructional materials (HQIM) and instructional practices used for all students Tier 1 instruction includes:

High-Quality Instructional Materials - Instructional materials that cover 100% of the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) and Systematic Explicit Instruction - Skills are taught from less to more complex using direct, clear, and concise instructional language

Differentiated Instruction - the practice of developing an understanding of how each student learns best, and then tailoring instruction to meet students' individual needs

Active Student Engagement - Ensuring all students are actively involved during instruction and are not passive recipients

Classroom Behavior Strategies - Privately and explicitly teach the expected behavior and routines, frequent use of reinforcement and praise (4:1 positive to negative feedback loop), quick and efficient transition times, and consistent instructional response to misbehavior

Instructional Delivery

Within their core instructions and interventions, teachers are expected to incorporate the features of effective instruction. These features include the following:

● Explicit instruction with modeling

● Systematic instruction with scaffolding

● Multiple opportunities to practice and respond

● Immediate and corrective feedback

● Appropriate pacing

● Use of multiple grouping formats

● Differentiated instruction

Tier 2—TARGETED

Tier 2 typically involves small-group instruction that relies on evidence-based interventions that specify the instructional procedures, duration, and frequency of instruction Tier 2 instruction usually consists of adult-led, small-group instruction using validated interventions implemented with fidelity Tier 2 supports are expected to benefit students who do not respond to effective Tier 1 instruction When data indicates students are not benefiting from Tier 2 interventions, more intensive instruction or an individualized form of intervention should be delivered through Tier 3 supports and services.

Tier 3–INTENSIVE

Tier 3 is the most intensive of the three levels and is individualized to target each student’s area(s) of need At Tier 3, the teacher often begins with a more intensive version of the intervention program used in secondary prevention (i.e., longer sessions, smaller group size, more frequent sessions). However, the teacher does not presume the plan will meet the student’s needs Instead, the teacher conducts frequent progress monitoring (at least weekly) with each student. The progress monitoring data quantify the effects of the intervention program by depicting the student’s rate of improvement over time When the progress monitoring data indicate the student’s rate of progress is unlikely to achieve the established learning goal, the teacher engages in a problem-solving process That is, the teacher modifies components of the intervention program and continues to employ frequent progress monitoring to evaluate which components enhance the rate of student learning By continually monitoring and modifying (as needed) each student’s program, the team can design an effective, individualized instructional plan

MTSS Team Workflow

The Multi-tiered System of Support is truly a best practice educational approach and school improvement model that exemplifies collective responsibility and encompasses a very broad scope of work. The MTSS Campus Leader (Assistant Principal/Student Services Coordinator) will provide training to staff, serve as the campus expert/contact, and work with the campus and the Director of MTSS to address campus structures and protocols, meetings, data analysis, problem-solving, and documentation MTSS necessitates a team approach that includes leadership and collaboration of all instructional leaders and educational professionals

Pampa Independent School District

MTSS Teams Members

Abby Hancock, Executive Curriculum Director

Jamie Winborne, Director of MTSS

Courtney Blackmon, Director of Educational Technology & Assessment

District Team

MTSS Campus Leaders

Jennifer Studebaker, Director of Special Populations

Team Leader - Jamie Winborne

Austin - Austin Lucero

Lamar - April Cross

Travis - Becky Snelgrooes

Wilson - Lisa Smith

PJH- Brittany Babcock

PHS - Michelle Jensen

Principal SSC/APs, MTSS Campus Leader Counselor

Instructional Coordinator

Teacher Leaders (3-4)

Campus MTSS Team (CLT)

Responsibilities

The MTSS district team meets monthly with a structured agenda that varies to address the following:

● Create district-wide systems that clearly establish roles and expectations, written protocols, and processes that lead campuses to support individual student needs

● Review district data, consider feedback and concerns from campus problem-solving teams, and make data-based decisions aligned with the district improvement plan

● Provide input on professional development as it relates to the district’s MTSS practice and Tier 1 needs

● Seeks input from other district representatives based on their position to provide additional insight

The MTSS Campus Leaders:

● Lead the MTSS Schoolwide data meeting three times per year.

● Ensure implementation of and monitor all CLT decisions

● Ensure Tier 1 (PLC) meetings are taking place monthly

● Ensure that Tier 2 and 3 (Individual Student Data Meetings) are taking place bi-weekly.

● Ensure all data has been entered in Branching Minds

● Review district data monthly

The team meets three times a year after universal screeners with a structured agenda to address the following as needed:

● Review universal screening data

● Review school-wide data, consider feedback and concerns from PLCs, and make data-based decisions;

● Provide input on professional development as it relates to the school’s MTSS practice and Tier 1 needs;

● Provide input regarding campus intervention/enrichment schedule, curriculum, and/or course offerings;

● Ensures all grade levels/contents are represented

● Create school-wide systems that clearly establish roles and expectations, written protocols, and processes that lead the campus to better support individual student needs

Principal Campus Principal

PLC (Tier 1 Data Team)

Principal AP/SSC (attends DDI meetings)

Instructional Coordinator (as needed)

Content Teachers

Tier 2 and 3 Student Data Team

MTSS Campus Leader

Instructional Coordinators Counselors

Student’s Classroom Teachers

Parents

**Other members as needed

● Provide professional development opportunities to ensure systems are effective and implemented with fidelity

● Ensures that systems are in place and operational

● Ensures that all team meetings are effective, documented, and meet the needs of ALL students

● Participates while the AP leads the CLT through MTSS decisions

● Meets as scheduled

● Answer PLC questions

○ What is it we want our students to know and be able to do?

○ How will we know if each student has learned it?

○ How will we respond when some students do not learn it?

○ How will we extend the learning for students who are already proficient?

● Determine initial interventions for students not learning, including accelerated learning requirements

● Monitor specified interventions with review of data

● A common agenda is used

○ MTSS explanation is provided to parents

○ Student Data is reviewed during meetings

○ The team supports grade levels/departments in determining or adjusting current student interventions

○ Refer students for comprehensive special education evaluations when data indicate this step is warranted according to the Special Education referral checklist

Meetings and MTSS Team Meeting Guide

Branching Minds now has an AI feature that will keep the minutes of each meeting Branching Minds resources

Decision Making

Directly tied to the data analysis in the decision-making process Within this process, the MTSS Student Data Team will have to answer questions such as the following:

● What is working within core instruction, and what is not?

● What kind of PD should we provide to teachers to fill in the gaps we see in our data?

● How many students can we serve in Tier 2? Tier 3?

● Which students should be moved to Tier 2? Tier 3?

● What do we do if we have too many students who meet our criteria for needing intervention?

● Who will provide Tier 2 interventions and documentation for students? Tier 3?

Data Analysis

Data analysis is an integral part of any MTSS framework Teachers should examine data regularly to target specific students’ needs, regroup students, and evaluate the effectiveness of their core/intervention instruction Administrators should examine data regularly to evaluate the effectiveness of core/intervention instruction, make PD decisions, and move students from one intervention to the next based on their needs

Specifically, the MTSS teams should meet with each grade level, K-5, after each screening assessment to examine data, evaluate instructional effectiveness, and move students into and out of interventions These structured data meetings should occur after BOY, MOY, and EOY assessments

Tier Movement

Decisions about which students to move into or out of Tiers 2 and 3 should take place during the structured student data meeting at BOY, MOY, and EOY. Once students have begun participating in Tier 2 or Tier 3 intervention, they need adequate time to demonstrate a response (usually defined as about 10 weeks of instruction or 40-50 sessions). At the end of this period, the MTSS Team can meet to evaluate student progress and determine whether each student should remain in an intervention, whether the intervention approach should be adjusted, whether to move into an intervention, or whether to move out of an intervention Tier movement should be fluid and not a stair-step approach to referring a student for special education.

Evaluating Student Progress

Teachers should collect progress-monitoring data at least every 2 weeks for students in Tier 2 and Tier 3 interventions This data should be used to target specific students’ needs and help teachers and administrators evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions

Required Documentation

To ensure a smooth transition from one campus to another, consistency in documentation is imperative. MTSS campus leaders must ensure that the following is documented throughout the year

Student Profile:

Tags- MTSS-Academic, MTSS-Behavior, MTSS monitor, (Let Director know any additional tags that might be needed)

Testing Accommodations- Enter for MTSS students (Text-to-Speech, Supplemental Aids are the only options for those receiving interventions through MTSS)

Academic performance data: Entered at the district level

mClass/NWEA data is used to tier students once windows are closed

STAAR EOCs are used to tier high school students and will be uploaded as received

STAAR/TELPAS data will be uploaded for all as it’s received.

Behavioral data:

● Observations of classroom behavior (Log Behavior Incident, Meeting, Family Communication)

● Discipline referrals (Log Behavior Incident)

● Attendance Notes (Meetings, Family Communication)

Tier 1 Academic and Behavioral Information:

● Evidence of differentiation strategies used at the Tier 1 level in the classroom (Supporting Documents, Goals & Progress, Interventions & Supports)

Tier 2 Academic Intervention Documentation:

● Specific intervention strategies used (Interventions & Supports)

● Frequency and duration of intervention sessions (Goals & Progress)

● Progress monitoring data (weekly data points on targeted skill) (Goals & Progress)

Tier 2 Behavior Intervention Documentation:

● Specific intervention strategies used (Interventions & Supports)

● Frequency and duration of intervention strategies (Goals & Progress)

● Anecdotal notes about the success of an intervention (Meetings, Goals & Progress)

Tier 3 Information:

● Documented by the specialist working with that student

● Frequency and duration of intervention strategies (Goals & Progress)

● Anecdotal notes about the success of an intervention (Meeting, Goals & Progress)

MTSS Meetings- Types and Frequency

Problem Solving Teams MTSS Schoolwide Data Meeting MTSS PLC Team

Goal Evaluate the school-wide Tier 1 health and wellness of the MTSS practice

Duration/ Frequency

Attendance

Monitor progress of students receiving Tier 2 and Tier 3 support, look for trends in support needs at the system, teacher, or student level

MTSS Individual Student Team Meetings

Deep dive problem-solving for students not making sufficient progress. Create/Revise intervention plans.

Agenda

hour, 3 times per year (post-universal screeners)

● MTSS Campus Leader

● Principal

● Instructional Coordinators

● Grade Level Reps

● Content Teachers

● Counselor/Behavior Specialist

● Director of MTSS (if needed)

● Examine the percentage of students adequately served at the Tier 1 level

● Examine equality of Tier 1 instruction (across demographics, grades, and classrooms)

● Evaluate student body growth and tier movement

● Evaluate the quality of intervention delivery

● Plan for improved support

● Grade level/Content -Teachers

● Instructional Coordinators

● MTSS Campus Leader

● Principal (if needed)

● Director of MTSS (if needed)

First meeting after screener

● Review Tier placement of students

● Review universal screener data for which students would benefit from an individual student meeting to determine adjustments to Tier 1, 2, or 3 Interventions

● Create targeted intervention plan in Branching Minds

● Refer students to MTSS campus leader through Branching Minds referral process

Follow-up Meetings

● Review progress of students receiving Tier 2 or 3 interventions

● Look for trends in student growth

● Make plan adjustments to promote growth

● Refer students to MTSS campus leader through Branching Minds referral process (if necessary)

● MTSS Campus Leader

● Classroom Teacher

● Instructional Coordinators (if serving students)

● Counselor

● Parents

● Special Ed Rep (Teacher, LSSP, Director) if needed

● Director of MTSS (if needed)

Meeting Protocol

● Define MTSS (FAQ Sheet)

● How is the student performing?

● What have we done thus far to support student?

● Analyze the Problem

● Purposed Intervention Plan

● Collect data to monitor progress every 2 weeks.

Follow-Up Meetings

● Evaluate whether supports are working

Upload and give a brief overview of the notes in Branching Minds under the Meeting tab on the student’s profile page. Plan adjustments should be made in Branching Minds under the student’s profile *Meeting Agendas are linked in the appendix

Team Members and Responsibilities

Role on Team

Administrative Representative

MTSS Campus Leader

Instructional Coordinators

Grade-level/ Content Teachers

As Needed Members

Responsibilities

● Provides leadership at Tiers 2 and 3 meetings

● Facilitates monitoring of instructional integrity of Tier 1 Instruction within grade levels/departments

● Ensures bi-weekly progress monitoring for all students in Tiers 2 and 3

● Ensures the school schedule and resource allocations enable a successful MTSS practice

● Celebrates and communicates success

● Coordinates and sets agendas for the MTSS team meetings

● Provides expertise in problem-solving and data analysis

● Identifies trends in student/staff needs across the school

● Gives reminders to teachers regarding deadlines

● Monitors Branching Minds entries

● Provides support to teachers in the MTSS progress and Branching Minds

● Communicates and collaborates regarding student progress

● Presents data/background information on the student

● Communicates student/staff needs

● Deliver Tier 2 and Tier 3 Intervention

● Coordinate meeting details with families (Time, date, location)

● Completes To-Dos in Branching Minds

● Provide background information about the student (if applicable)

● Provides expertise to the problem-solving team

● Suggests appropriate supports/interventions

Staff Member

Principal

Assistant Principal or Student Services Coordinator

Instructional Coordinators

Grade-level teachers Content teachers

Determined by student need May include, but not limited to:

Special Ed Rep Director of MTSS Parent Coach

Counselor

LSSP SLP

Assessments

To implement an MTSS framework, we have identified screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring assessments and a time frame for which the assessments are recommended

Universal Screener- Given at BOY, MOY, EOY

Pre-Kindergarten CLI-CIRCLE

Kindergarten Amplify mClass/Lectura NWEA MAP Growth Dyslexia Screener

1st Grade Amplify mClass/Lectura NWEA MAP Growth Dyslexia Screener

2nd Grade Amplify mClass/Lectura NWEA MAP Growth Dyslexia Screener

3rd Grade NWEA MAP Growth

4th Grade NWEA MAP Growth

5th Grade NWEA MAP Growth

6th Grade NWEA MAP Growth

7th Grade NWEA MAP Growth NWEA MAP Fluency

8th Grade NWEA MAP Growth

9th-12th Grade ???

Progress Monitoring

Pre-Kindergarten

9th-12th

Pampa Independent School District Updated 8/2025

Schedule for Universal Screeners and Progress Monitoring

Interventions Behavior

MTSS is a critical component of addressing students with behavior concerns Behavior should be documented in Branching Minds as a Behavior Incident if it is impacting the student's learning, but not to the level of an office referral Behavior that escalates to an office referral will be documented in Ascender (Follow campus expectations for entering behavior documentation.)

If a student has behavior concerns that impact the student's learning, they should be addressed through a Student Data Meeting

Resources to help provide behavior interventions:

● Tier 1, 2, and 3 Behavior Interventions- Created by Region 16

● PBIS World

● Tier 1 Interventions

● Tier 2 Interventions

● Tier 3 Interventions

Behavior documentation in Branching Minds is critical to support students as they transition through grades and campuses

MTSS’s Relationship with Other Programs

MTSS and Special Education

One purpose of implementing an MTSS framework is to help identify students who need intervention support. Providing early interventions, targeting specific student needs, and monitoring student progress should prevent some students from needing specialized services

However, some students’ lack of response to these research-based interventions will provide administrators and teachers with data and indicate that the student may require more specialized instruction In these cases, the MTSS Student Data Team should complete the Pampa ISD Referral Checklist to include:

● All screening, diagnostic, and progress-monitoring data (including a line graph with the student’s progress-monitoring data is included.)

● Information about the core instruction, Tier 2 interventions, and/or Tier 3 interventions that have been provided to the student

● Evidence that these various levels of instruction have been appropriately monitored

● Any notes about specific goals set for the student and instructional strategies tried to accelerate the student’s response to instruction

Considerations for MTSS Support of Emergent Bilinguals

The term Emergent Bilingual (EB) refers to students whose first language is not English and encompasses both students who are just beginning to learn English (often referred to in federal legislation as "limited English proficient" or "LEP") and those who have already developed considerable proficiency The term underscores the fact that these students are mastering another language in addition to meeting all the academic challenges that face their monolingual peers Branching Minds takes students’ proficiency level into account when collecting the Insight Survey and recommends interventions and accommodations matched to their needs.

It is helpful to take into account the following considerations when supporting Emergent Bilinguals through an MTSS model:

● Teaching should be culturally responsive: The student’s prior experiences should be considered, including home language background and socio-cultural background

● Language Proficiency & Reading Instruction: Teachers should consider the relationship between a student’s language proficiency and his/her literacy skills. Reading fluency and comprehension may be strongly determined by the vocabulary and linguistic proficiency of both the first and second languages.

● Language Proficiency & Math Instruction: Linguistic proficiency and vocabulary comprehension are important when understanding math concepts. Some concepts of math are not necessarily universal

● Additional Variables: Within MTSS problem-solving, literacy and oracy (in both home and new languages), culture, and educational history are variables to be considered when assessing and planning instruction for EB. In all three tiers, these variables stay consistent.

● English Language Acquisition: Core instruction for all LEP/EB students must always include English language learning as well.

● Matching Instruction to Student Need: Differentiated instruction should be used for ALL students; however, differentiated instruction for EB should consider the student’s level of English proficiency and prior educational experiences in addressing cultural and linguistic differences When determining appropriate instruction/intervention, the following list applies to all levels of EB students:

○ Consider the amount and type of ESL/Bilingual instruction the student received in the past and the present

○ If applicable, consider the amount and type of home language instruction in the past and the present

○ Ensure that the language(s) used for intervention match the language(s) used for core instruction

○ Consider the impact of language and culture on instruction and learning

○ Contact the family for guidance and feedback

○ Ensure that certified ESL teachers serve on the MTSS instructional decision-making team

MTSS and GT

It is not uncommon for students to be gifted in one area but struggle academically in another area or struggle behaviorally After examining relevant data, the MTSS team should determine if any student would benefit from academic or behavioral interventions through the MTSS process If a student has been identified and is served through the Gifted and Talented program, interventions will be put in place as needed and monitored Through the MTSS process, it should be determined if a student requires a furlough or exit from GT services

MTSS Process:

1. The committee meets and decides there is a need to request a furlough or exit of GT services.

2 Data is included to inform of the reason for the request

3 The MTSS committee communicates with parents about the need for such a request

4 Furlough/Exit request submitted to the GT Coordinator

5 The GT Committee reviews requests and informs the MTSS Committee and parents of the final decision

Furlough Policy:

1. A furlough request can be submitted by a teacher, parent, administrator, or on the student’s request.

2 Furlough can be for personal or academic reasons

3 The furlough request will be taken to the GT Committee, and they will decide whether to grant or deny the request.

4 When the furlough window is up, the student may resume services, or the party involved can request an extension.

5 At the end of the school year, a furlough will be nulled, and services will resume the following year

Exit Policy:

1. Exiting of students from gifted/talented services is based on multiple criteria, including student performance in response to services

2 Interventions are provided before the committee's decision Exiting a student is finalized by committee decision after consultation with parents and students regarding the student’s educational needs

-If a teacher initiates the petition, that teacher shall provide documentation to support his/her contention for removal from services.

-If a student or parent(s)/guardian(s) requests removal, the district will honor that request after a conference with the selection committee or its representative

Note: Should a student exit from services, the process shall be accomplished in such a manner to avoid adding undue pressure to the student or parent(s)/guardian(s), and without prejudice. It shall be recognized that the purpose of G/T services is to best serve the academic and affective needs of the child. Once exited, a student must complete the screening/testing process to be identified G/T.

MTSS and Parent/Caregiver Communication

Each campus should have a method for communicating to caregivers in general about the campus’s MTSS framework General information related to interventions and other aspects of the MTSS framework can be communicated through parent/caregiver meetings, campus newsletters, or other forms of communication

When a decision is made to move a student to Tier 2 or Tier 3 intervention, parents/caregivers must be invited to the MTSS meeting. Parents can meet in person, via phone, or via video conference. If a parent declines a meeting, a letter from Branching Minds describing the intervention and how the intervention will affect student success must be provided to inform the parent/caregiver of the intervention.

Texas Education Code § 26.0081 states: "Each school year, each school district shall notify a parent of each child who receives assistance from the district for learning difficulties, including through the use of intervention strategies, as that term is defined by Section 26.004, that the district provides that assistance to the child The comunication must include:

● A description of the assistance and intervention strategies to be used

● A summary of any interventions of a multi-tiered system of support (MTSS) that have been used with the child previously

● The estimated length of time the intervention will be provided

● The estimated time frames for progress reports on the child's assistance and intervention strategies

Pampa Independent School District Updated 8/2025

APPENDIX

In an MTSS framework, interventions must be targeted and aligned with a clear, measurable goal documented in Branching Minds This goal should address the specific area of need identified through a universal screener or progress monitoring data The specific goals serve as the focus to help monitor progress and determine appropriate interventions

Example of Goals

Grade Level Non-Example Example

Kinder Sue will show appropriate classroom behaviors.

1st Grade Joe will improve phonic skills

Sue will stay in her seat during academic work periods as measured by the student’s point sheet.

Joe will identify letter sounds for all 26 letters of the alphabet (short vowel sounds) with 90% accuracy as measured using letter/sound flashcards.

4th Grade Jill will add and subtract two-digit numbers Jill will determine the correct operation and solve problems requiring addition and subtraction of two-digit numbers with and without regrouping, with 80% accuracy, as measured on teacher-made assessments.

Junior High John will master probability and statistics John will determine whether problems are permutations or combinations, choose the correct formulas, and solve problems with and without visual representations, with 80% accuracy, as measured on teacher-made assessments

High School Emma will be able to read quickly and accurately Given an 8th-grade instructional-level text, Emma will read 80 words correctly with 85% accuracy.

High School Sally will improve her study skills

After assistance creating an organization system, Sally will complete and turn in assigned work on time, as measured by scoring a weekly average of 3 or better on a 4-point teacher feedback sheet

Guidance For MTSS Tier Support and Meetings

Tier 1 Guidance

AttributesofTier1:AllStudentsreceiveinstruction,tutorials,andreteaching opportunities

Tier 1 Data Meeting (DDI) Action Steps:

Following an assessment, the PLC team analyzes data at the grade, class, standard, and student level to

● Evaluate the effectiveness of tier 1 classroom instruction

● Determine opportunities for whole-class reteaching and/or small-group reteaching

● Determine supports to incorporate into tier 1 instruction

● Determine supports to incorporate into the intervention period and/or tutorials

● Determine reassessment

Teacher Actions

● Implement and document tier 1 supports in the classroom for some time

● Document progress of tier 1 supports (Suggested Documentation: BrM Goal and Progress Monitoring or other progress monitoring document)

● Follow-up meeting at the tier 1 level to determine the effectiveness of supports and next steps

○ Student makes progress- continue with plan

○ Student not making progress- Laserfische form

Optional Steps:

● Teacher completes insight survey in Branching Minds- analyzes for weaknesses and addresses as needed

● Counselor completes the Forced Choice Survey if motivation is a factor

Tier 2 Guidance

Attributes of Tier 2:

Targeted interventions will typically occur in small groups or during intervention periods and will occur frequently until enough data is available to determine a response. Weekly progress monitoring (through Branching Minds) is used to monitor responses to targeted interventions.

Before Meeting: Teacher

● Teacher completes Insight Survey in Branching Minds if not completed at the tier 1 level (Reading, Math, Writing, Speech, Behavior)

● The teacher ensures that all tier 1 supports are documented in Branching Minds

● Teacher compiles tier 1 data (work samples, intervention data, classroom observations, etc)

● The parent is notified of the tier 2 meeting and invited

● If behavior referral, a parent survey given by the counselor/administrator Designee

● Attendance data gathered by designee (Ascender Enterprise)

● MAP data gathered by designee (Branching Minds/AWARE)

● If necessary, Discipline data gathered by AP/SSC (Branching Minds and/or Ascender Enterprise)

Tier 2 Initial Meeting Action Steps:

● The team completes the initial meeting form in Branching Minds

● Determines targeted intervention from menu of options in Branching Minds

● Determines when the follow-up meeting will be to monitor progress

Tier 2 Follow-Up Meeting:

● Determine progress of Tier 2 designated intervention

● Determine to change intervention, adjust Tier 2 interventions, or transition to Tier 3 intervention

Tier 3 Guidance

Attributes of Tier 3:

Intensive intervention occurs in small groups or individually and occurs frequently Progress monitoring measures are administered frequently to allow for timely decision-making

Prior to Meeting: Teacher

● The teacher ensures that all tier 2 supports are documented in Branching Minds

● Teacher compiles tier 2 data (work samples, intervention data, classroom observations, etc )

● The parent is notified of the tier 3 meeting and invited

● If a behavior referral, a parent survey is given by the counselor/administrator Designee

● Attendance data gathered by designee (Ascender Enterprise)

● MAP data gathered by designee (Branching Minds/AWARE)

● Intervention Data entered in Branching Minds

● Discipline data gathered by AP/SSC (Branching Minds and/or Ascender Enterprise)

Tier 3 Meeting:

● Review any Tier 2 data and progress (or lack thereof)

● Determine intensive intervention, frequency, person responsible, etc.

● Determine the date for the follow-up meeting or proceed to recommend testing

Tier 3 Follow-Up Meeting:

● The team reviews data from progress monitoring and any pertinent data

● The team determines if Tier 3 supports are continued or if the student can begin a “phase-out plan ”

● If adequate progress is not made, a Special Education referral is made

● Referral Checklist complete

● Letter written by the principal

Optional Agendas:

Initial Tier 2 or 3 Meeting Agenda-To be documented or linked in Branching Minds:

Initial Tier 2 or 3 MTSS Student Meeting Guide

Date of Meeting: Team Members present:

Student Name/Grade

Background/Environmental Factors

Background information, homeless, EB, 504, GT, Extracurriculars, etc

Resource: Ascender Enterprise or Teacher Portal

Review Benchmark/Screeners

Strengths/Weaknesses

Resource: Branching Minds Student Overview Page, Eduphoria Aware

Review Teacher Observations

Branching Minds Insight Survey Results

Tier 1 Student Meeting Notes

Specific Areas of Challenge

Branching Minds- Mini Dessa

Tier 1 Student Data Meeting Notes

Classroom Behaviors

Strengths/Weaknesses

Behavior Incident Report

Brainstorm Menu of Solutions

Resources: PBIS World, Teacher’s Encyclopedia, Branching Minds Library

Review Insight Survey in Branching Minds for reading, math, writing, or behavior

Intervention Plan

Choose one option from above and develop a plan

Document in Branching Minds: Intervention & Support Goal Progress Monitor Added in Branching Minds

Link this Document in Branching Minds

Branching Minds Meetings Button

Follow-up Meeting Plan and calendar

Family Communication

Branching Minds Family Communication Tab

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Tier 2 or 3 Follow-Up Meeting Agenda

Tier 2 Follow-Up Student Data Meeting- To be documented in Branching Minds

Tier 2 or 3 Six Weeks Follow-Up Guide

Student Name/Grade Level

Referring Teacher

Reason for Referral Reading Math Behavior Other

Discussion of Current Interventions (Dates of implementation, frequency, duration, person responsible, results)

Additional Interventions or Updates

Intervention #1

Intervention #2

Is the student making progress as evidenced by progress monitoring data?

Refer for SPED Testing

Ensure Referral Checklist Items are complete

Continue monitoring at the Tier 2 level

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.