Page 1

YU HAN LEE PORTFOLIO 2003-2013


GSAPP ACADEMIC WORKS IN COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, NY

01 INTERSTICITY

02 VERTICAL TYPOLOGIES 03 GRID OFF GRID 04 OTHER WORKS

THU

ACADEMIC WORKS IN TUNGHAI UNIVERSITY, TAIWAN

05 MUSE MUSEUM OF URBAN SCAVENGED EQUIPMENTS 06 MONSTER. INC

07 AN URBAN PURE LAND

Professional Works TAIWAN

08 PROFESSIONAL WORKS WITH TSAI&LEE ASSOCIATES

002


YU HAN LEE BIO

• Born December 24th, 1983. Taiwanese nationality.

EDUCATION

• Master of Science in Advanced Architectural Design from GSAPP Columbia University.

I 2013 I

• Bachelor of Architecture from Tunghai University, Taichung City, Taiwan.

I 2007 I

HONORS AND AWARDS

• ‘William Kinne Traveling Fellowship’, Columbia University.

I 2013 I

• Selected student for ‘International Workshop on Asian Reality: Choreographing Uncertainty’. Taichung, Taiwan.

I 2008 I

• ‘Outstanding Thesis Design Award’, short-listed. Tunghai University.

I 2007 I

• Scholarship for ‘Tunghai Architecture in Rome’, Roman Aqueduct Workshop. Cornell University in Rome.

I 2006 I

• ‘W.S. Hung Annual Memorial Award’, short-listed. Tunghai University.

I 2006 I

• Representative in ‘Design Exchange Conference’ between Tunghai University and Chung Yuan Christian University.

I 2005 I

WORKING EXPERIENCE

• Wu’s Deco Disign Co., Junior Architect. I 6 months I

I 2012 I

Elaboration of preliminary design for high-end hotels. Implementation of architectural and interior conceptual approach. Development of construction drawings and rendered images for client’s marketing and decision making. Main projects: 1. Regent Hotel, Kaohsiung, Taiwan I 370, 680 sq.ft. I 2. City Suite Hotel Fuxing, Taipei, Taiwan I 680,220 sq.ft. I • Tsai & Lee Associates, Junior Architect. I 30 months I

Production of design working sets for commercial and residential spaces. Development of urban planning master plansm, environmental strategies , construction drawings, rendered images, and presentations. Sustainability research to adjust to tropical weather conditions and arrangement of building permits. Main projects: 1. Condominium at Ping-Jen City, Taiwan I 309,700 sq.ft. I 2. Great Roots Forestry Spa Resort, Taipei, Taiwan I 212,850 sq.ft. I 3. Technology Building at Jhongli City, Taiwan I 116,540 sq.ft. I 4. Linyi Street Apartment Building, Taipei, Taiwan I 104,170 sq.ft. I 5. Taipei Arena Metro Station Commercial and Residential Complex, Taipei, Taiwan I 730,000 sq.ft. I

Resume

I 2008-2011 I


• Studiobase Architects, Intern. I 7 months I

I 2005 I

Elaboration of physical models and working presentations. Main projects: 1. Wen-Der Police Station, Taipei, Taiwan I 40,350 sq.ft. I 2. Apartment building at Parklane, Taichung, Taiwan I 170,430 sq.ft. I

PUBLICATIONS

• Intersticity in ‘Abstract 2012-2013’, Columbia University GSAPP

I 2013 I

• Thsesis design MUSE in ‘9032. Project review of 2007 Tunghai University Department of Architecture’

I 2007 I

LANGUAGES

• Mandarin Chinese I native I • English I TOEFL 101 I • Japanese I basic I

COMPUTER SKILLS

• Computer Aided Design (CAD): Autodesk AutoCAD. • Building Information Modeling (BIM): Autodesk Revit. • Modeling, animation and rendering package: Autodesk 3DStudio Max, Rhino, SketchUp, Vray, Mentalray. • Graphic, vectorial, and video editing: Adobe Creative Suite CS: Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, After Effects. • Parametric Design and Optimization: Grasshopper, CATIA, modeFRONTIER, Galapagos • Structures Calculationand and Environmental Evaluation: Robot, Ecotect. • Geographical Information System: ArcGIS • Microsoft Office: Word, Excel, Power Point.

004


Intersticity I 2012 gsapp I


01

Intersticity 2012 FALL C-BIP STUDIO GSAPP INSTRUCTOR: DAVID BENJAMIN With new models of more intelligent building design operations emerging, there arises a need to negotiate between the brutal efficiency of computational optimization on one hand and on the other non-quantitative architectural values—especially in complex cultural contexts such as rebuilding the city of Basra. Given the task of designing a tower in a city such as Basra, we developed a position based on the idea of interstitiality, both spatially and conceptually. This new tower will establish a framework that mediates the intersection of the culturally diverse urban fabric of the local city and the new modern development of the Basra Sport complex. Through our methodology that combines collaboration, computation, and intuition, we are able to produce a design that strikes a balance between the city and the new development, between culture and sustainability, and between a more traditional approach to design and one with more explorative possibilities.

006


Design Map_ Workflow Strategy

STEP 01 CONCEPTION

STEP 02 OPTIMIZATION

Wind Velocity Separate Objectives

Structural Failure

Comprehensive Objectives Program Efficiency

CONCEPT + OBJECTIVES

FORM GENERATION

DEVELOP OBJECTIVES

PREDICTIONS

A modular trifurcated tower design was selected as the

After developing test objectives, we make educated

ideal form generation strategy because of its spatial

predictions before running the optimization tests.

and performative benefits. It strikes a balance between

Designs are generated and the results are filtered in

a more traditional method of design which tends to be

order to find trends and high performing designs.

heavily control and a more flexible method of design which tends to be too chaotic.

Intersticity I 2012 gsapp I


STEP 03 EXTRAPOLATION

MANUAL TEST VALIDATION

Design 234 modeFrontier

Sustainablity Tower

Element Selection

Design Development

Cultural Tower

Element Selection

Design Development

Compatibility Design 846 Design 1478 Design 78 324

Design 1478

3415

Selected Design

101 3415

Simulation

GENERATE DESIGNS

Scores

DESIGN FILETERS SELECTED DESIGN

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

DESIGN CALIBRATION Benefits of both a combination of computer and human

Designs were filtered according to our objectives for

intelligence. A greater number of designs generated

each tower. After a group of building segments were

and evaluated (x1,000). Consolation/Feedback occurs

selected, tower designs were generated manually for

earlier in the design process

visual and aesthetic cohesion and consistency. The team divided into two separate groups. One would develop a tower focused on sustainability, while the other would focus on cultural aspects.

008


Step 01_ Conception SITE ANALYSIS BASRA

ISSUES BASRA SPORT CITY

SECURITY

WIND

PRIVACY

SCENARIOS OF POLYHEDRAL SPACE FLOOR PLATES

Intersticity I 2012 gsapp I

AXONOMETRIC_ 8 FLOORS

SINGLE POLYHEDRONS


CONCEPT

FORM GENERATIVES

INTERSTICITY

TRIFURCATION Traditional sketch

TRIFURCATION Profile Typology

Modular Trifurcation

Kinetic Syetem

Voxel Shaping

FLEXIBLE

CONTORL

POLYHEDRAL SEGMENT DETAIL

Private residential unit

public common area

Private residential unit

Private residential unit

010


Step 02_ Optimization THREE OBJECTIVES B_ MINIMIZE STRUCTURAL FAILURE

A_ MAXIMIZE WIND SPEED

Trifurcated massing

Cylindrical massing

Bar size_ 250mm Tubes Live load_ 4788 N Slab thickness_ 300mm Displacement Tolerance_ 30mm

STRUCTURAL TEST SETUP Rectangular massing

POST-TEST ANALYSIS B_ TOWER SEGMENT_ HIGH PERFORMANCE DESIGN

A_ HIGH PREFORMING DESIGNS 19

Max Program Scores 80 72 64 56 48 40 32 24 16 8 0

MAX WIND VELOCITY (m/s)

19

MAX WIND VELOCITY (M/S)

16

16 MAX PROGRAM SCORE 80 72 64 56 48 40 32 24 16 8 0

13

10 100

200

300

400

500

MIN STRUCTURE SCORE

13

After we surpassed 2,000 design iterations we began an analysis of the design results to search for trends and find the Pareto frontier. The closer the dots are to the left portion of this graph the better because we want 10 100

200

300 MIN STRUCTURE SCORE

Intersticity I 2012 gsapp I

400

500

to minimize on the X-axis and maximize on the Y-axis. The more red dots are preferred because they have a higher program score.


C_ MAXIMIZE PROGRAM EFFICIENCY PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION RULE

PROGRAM SCORE

Public

Inbetween

Private

Horizontal Continuity

Neighbourhood Variability

Vertical Continuity

PublicScore = 9

Good

Plate stress X, Y, Z

Nodal displacement_ bending failures

PrivateScore = 9

+2

+3

+3

+1

+3

+3

+1

+3

PublicScore = 0

Bad

InbetweenScore = 4

+3

InbetweenScore = 0

PrivateScore = 0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

C_ EVALUATION PROCESS_ SEGMENT COMBINATION RANGE

SCORES MAX PRIVACY

5-10

MAX PUBLIC

2-6

MAX PROGRAM

3-7

HIGHEST PERFORMANCE DESIGN

PROGRAM _PUBLIC

PROGRAM _PRIVATE

PROGRAM _INBETWEEN

STRUCTRUE

NO. 1145

1125

654

456

1456

45

1354

432

1234

1496

112

213

473

578

1145

1890

1695

56

1137

VELOCITY

GOOD FOR: higher regions

SUSTAINABLE TOWER

PROGRAM _PUBLIC

MAX STRUCTURE 23-28 PROGRAM _PRIVATE

PROGRAM _INBETWEEN

STRUCTRUE

NO. 1343

MAX VELOCITY

VELOCITY

GOOD FOR: Lower Regions

PROGRAM _PUBLIC

PROGRAM _PRIVATE

MAX PRIVACY

8-10

MAX PUBLIC

1-6

MAX PROGRAM

1-7

PROGRAM _INBETWEEN

STRUCTRUE

NO. 1756

25-30

VELOCITY

GOOD FOR: Lower Regions CULTURE TOWER PROGRAM _PUBLIC

PROGRAM _PRIVATE

STRUCTRUE

NO. 1410

PROGRAM _INBETWEEN

MAX STRUCTURE 23-86

VELOCITY

GOOD FOR: Middle Regions

MAX VELOCITY

11-30

012


Step 02_ Geometric Variations of Tower Segment

Intersticity I 2012 gsapp I


014


Step 03_ Extrapolation _ Design Calibration SELECTED

LOCATION

OBJECTIVE

OBJECTIVE

PROGRAM

CHUNK

& CHUNK ID

WEIGHT

SCORE

DISTRIBUTION

8-10

1-6

1-7

23-26

PROGRAM _PUBLIC

TEST 02 ID 00051

66 PROGRAM _PRIVATE

PROGRAM _PRIVATE

Private Score

Public Inbetween Score Score

8-10

1-6

PROGRAM _INBETWEEN

STRUCTRUE

VELOCITY

Private Score

VELOCITY

3-6

3.5 3.5

2-7

Min Structure

23-27

18-20

Max Velocity

11-12

44

22 Private Score

Max Velocity

24

26 26 Public Inbetween Score Score

77 PROGRAM _INBETWEEN

STRUCTRUE

23-26

A continuous vertical circulation system allows for minimal disruption of the program

12 11

2

1-10

PROGRAM _PUBLIC

PROGRAM _PRIVATE

1-7

Min Structure

90 90

MIDDLE

TEST 01 ID 00105

22 28

VELOCITY

PROGRAM _PUBLIC

BOTTOM

33

PROGRAM _INBETWEEN

STRUCTRUE

TEST 02 ID 00229

18-20 18 15

TOP

CIRCULATION

Public Inbetween Score Score

1211

Min Structure

Max Velocity

23-86

11-30

CULTURAL TOWER SELECTED CHUNK

8-10 PROGRAM _PUBLIC

TOP TEST 02 ID 00051

PROGRAM _PRIVATE

1-7

5

PROGRAM _INBETWEEN

STRUCTRUE

1-6

9

VELOCITY

2 Private Score

8-10

PROGRAM _PUBLIC

Public Inbetween Score Score

1-6

1-7

38

10

Min Structure

Max Velocity

23-86

11-30

8

MIDDLE TEST 02 ID 00229

PROGRAM _PRIVATE

PROGRAM _INBETWEEN

VELOCITY

PROGRAM _PRIVATE

SELECTED CHUNK

Intersticity I 2012 gsapp I

Public Inbetween Score Score

4-6

1-7

38 Min Structure

23-154

Max Velocity

11-30

5 PROGRAM _INBETWEEN 3

2

15 30

STRUCTRUE

SUSTAINABLE TOWER

Private Score

1-10

PROGRAM _PUBLIC

TEST 01 ID 00105

15 1

STRUCTRUE

BOTTOM

5

VELOCITY

Private Score

Public Inbetween Score Score

Min Structure

Max Velocity

A staggered circulation system allows for completely vertical elements


PROGRAM

CFD

FEA

DESIGN

ELABORATION

ALIGNMENT

ALIGNMENT

GENERATION

Sightseeing

Culture

15.6942 M/S 14.8242 M/S

28

VELOCITY

Sport

NEW

Hotel Residence

OLD

Sport

NEW

Restaurant Green Open Space

OLD

25

STRUCTURE

12.5723 M/S 11.1342 M/S

26 24

Hotel

VELOCITY

NEW

OLD

Sport Academia

NEW

OLD

Green

Culture

STRUCTURE

Leisure Leisure Restaurant Open Space Culture Green

11.5686 M/S 11.3963 M/S

25 22

NEW

OLD

NEW

OLD

Office

Academia VELOCITY

Service

STRUCTURE

CULTURAL TOWER

Sightseeing

Culture 11.6084 M/S

38 35

VELOCITY

OLD

OLD

Sport Green Open Space

NEW

11.5686 M/S

NEW

Hotel Residence

Restaurant

STRUCTURE

15.5518 M/S 40

15.3369 M/S 38

Service Green

VELOCITY

Restaurant Open Space Green

NEW

OLD

OLD

Leisure

NEW

Hotel Residence

Sport

STRUCTURE

15.5596 M/S

Academia

15.2979 M/S

30 28

VELOCITY

NEW

OLD

Green Shopping

Office NEW

Open Space

Leisure

OLD

Restaurant

STRUCTURE

SUSTAINABLE TOWER

016


Sustainable Tower

Intersticity I 2012 gsapp I


Cultural Tower

018


Step 03_ Extrapolation _ Building Element Selection BUILDING ELEMENT A_ ELEMENT DATABASE

B_ CONCEPT

TYPE ID 64

ELEMENT NAME Armature System

62

PaverFilter

65

Integral Tensegrity

14

UNI

ROOF

mp2904

Y

COURTYARD Y

FACADE Y

GEOMETRY

INTERIOR N

OTHER Y

META Y

INPUT POINT NUMBER 5

INPUT PLANE NUMBER 0

OTHER INPUT GEOMETRY 0

dho2103

Y

Y

N

N

Y

N

3

0

0

tmd2118

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

3

0

0

N

N

Y

N

N

N

1

1

0

SCALE MIN 2M

SCALE MAX 10M

OPEN RATIO MIN N/A

OPEN RATIO MAX

DEPTH RATIO MIN

N/A

N/A

DEPTH RATIO MAX N/A

STRUCTURE

DIRECTION H/V

GEO VARIABILITY 0.8

GEO TYPE L

GEOMETRY OPERATION N/A

SUBMODULE / SUBUNIT NUMBER MIN 3

SUBMODULE / SUBUNIT NUMBER MAX 3

WEIGHT 0.1

ENERGY PRODUCTION

N

Y N

MOVING WIND/AIR

4 0

Y

Y

N

N

0.2

0

0

0

0.7

0.1

0.1

1

Y 1

N

Y

Y

N

CURVATURED INPUT OUTPUT BASE PARAMETER PARAMETER SURFACE NUMBER NUMBER

0.7 0.5

N

0.6

1

TRADITIONAL PREFABABILITY

Y N

Y

0.3

1

OTHER

N

0

0.5

0.6

0.9

N

Y

0.7

0.2

0.9 N

4 5

GEOMETRY SIMPLICITY

SEAMLESSNESS

0

N/A

0.7

0.1

1

N/A

0.4

0.1

0 2

0.8 0.3

0.9 0.9

RESOLUTION TYPE

AESTHETIC RULE NUMBER

KNOWLEDGE PATTERN NUMBER

INSTENTIATE SIMPLICITY

SUBJECTIVE AESTHETIC JUDGEMENT

COST COST

H/L

0

0

0.8

0.7

0.5

M

1

0

0.5

0.3

0.3

0.1

L

0

N/A

0 0

1 0

0.8 0

0.8 0.3

0.5 0.3

0.5

6

1

0.8

0.8

0.5

L

0

0

0.7

0.7

0.6

0.9

5

1

0.6

0.9

0.6

M

1

3

0.6

0.3

0.5

2

Flexible Louver Strip

cag2165

Y

N

Y

N

Y

N

4

3

0

0.3M

5M

0.2

0.8

0.1

1

V

0.3

Loft

1

100

0.2

0.5

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

0.3

14

4

0.8

0.8

0.3

M / L

0

4

0.2

0.3

43

Green Chimney

mp2791

Y

N

N

N

Y

N

1

2

0

1M

100M

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

V

0.5

L

L

1

1

0.8

0.7

1

0.5

0.1

0.2

0

0.2

0.2

Reduce CO2 Level

0.6

7

2

0.8

0.7

0.1

H/L

0

10

0.7

0.4

0.7

40

Tessellated Structures

an2400

Y

N

N

N

Y

Y

4

1

0

3M

100M

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

V/H

0.5

L

E

1

100

0.3

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

FAR

0.9

18

5

0.2

0.9

0.5

M

1

7

0.3

0.6

0.3

0.3M

30M

N/A

N/A

100

0.1

0.1

0.1

0

0.5

0

0.2

0.3

4

4

1

0.7

0.7

L

1

1

0.8

0.4

0.1

1

0.7

0.9

0.9

N/A

0

L

1 Rule 1 VB/Action

51

Pocket Change

23

ShadowBox

46 49

ks2475

N

N

N

Y

x

N

4

1

0

evr2108

N

N

N

N

N

N

5

1

0

15 36

59

0.3

V/H

0.7

N/A

V/H

0.4

F

1

1

0.7

0.9

0.7

0

0

1

V/H

0.3

S

F

1

1

0.3

0.6

0.3

0.7

0.1

N/A

H/V

0.2

L

E

1

100

0.2

0.5

0.5

N

N

N

N

Y

N

Y

0.7

6

3

0

H/V

0.7

L/S/V

L

1

1

0.5

0

0.8

Y

N

Y

N

N

Y

N

0.2

7

5

0.7

0.5M

5M

0

0.7

0

4

1M

100M

N/A

N/A

N/A

0

1

3M

30M

0

0.7

N/A

N/A

V/H

0.5

S

F

1

S

Multi-Section Surface

1

L V

F

1

1

0.2

0.9

0.9

0

0

0

0.1

0.1

1

0.8

0.1

0

0

0.7

0

4

0

0

1M

20M

N/A

N/A

0.5

1

H

0.5

Surface

Fill

1

20

0.2

0.2

0.2

1

0

0

0

0

0

0.8

18

1

1

0.5

1

N/A

VB/Action

VB/Action

0.5

0.3

0.1

4

1

0

3M

10M

N/A

N/A

0.4

0

H

0.3

S

Surface Join

1

1

0.4

0

0.5

0

0

0.2

0

0

0.4

0.6

5

0

0.7

0.7

0.8

N/A

0

3

0.6

0.6

0.5

2

3

0

0.3M

3M

0

1

0

1

V/H

0.5

S

E

1

1

0.3

0.2

0.5

0.7

0

0

0

0.3

0.5

1

8

4

0

0.8

0.9

H/L

0

0

0.5

0.7

0.4

2M

10M

0.2

V/H

0.4

0.7

0.2

1

0.2

0.9

13

0.9

0.5

0.3

V

Y

N

N

N

4

0

0

1M

1M

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

V

0.1

volume

1

1

0.1

0.1

N

N

N

0

1

List of Curves

1M

5M

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

H

0.2

S/V

Loft

1

1

0.8

0.1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Y

Y

N

Y

5

1

0

1M

1M

0

0

0.2

0.3

H/V

0.1

V

L

1

1

0.6

0.5

0.7

N

Y

N

N

Y

N

mem2202 jfs2118 jff2117 kb2543 hrw2112

N Y N Y

N N N N

Y Y Y Y

N N N N

N Y N Y

N N N N

8 5 4 4

0 0 1 2

0 0 0 0

2M 2M 3M 4M

10M 3M 10M 30M

N/A 0 0.1 0.2

N/A 0

1 0.2

1

1

0.6

0.1

0

H

0.7 0.3 0.1

V V/H V/H

0.3 0.4 0.8 0.7

V

Surface Join

V

L

volume

Join Tube, Fill

V

Surface Join

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

0.4

0.8

0

0

0

0

0.5

1

1 0

0.1

0.2

0.1

0

S/L

Join Tube, Fill

2M

N

N

N

N

5

1

0

3M

Y

N

Y

N

4

0

0

1M

N Y

Y N

Y Y

Y N

4 4

0 0

0 0

4M 3M

20M 10M 3M 30M 30M

N/A 0.1 0.1 N/A 0

N/A

0

0.1

V

0.3

0.9

0.1

0.9

V/H

0.2

L

1

N/A

N/A

V/H

0.5

Surface

N/A

N/A

N/A

0

V

0.2

E Fill

1

1 100

1

1

1

1

0.3 0.6

0

0.2 0.5

0.1

0.6

0.7

0.6

0 1 0.8

8

0.2

0.5

F

15

100

0.4

0.2

V

Multi-Section Surface

1

1

0.3

0.1

0

0.8

L

E

1

2

0.5

0.7

0.8

0.6

2

0

3

3M

30M

0

0.3

4

0

0

1M

100M

N/A

N/A

0

N

0

2

0

2M

5M

N/A

N/A

0.1

0.1

H

N

N

4

1

0

3M

10M

0.1

0.9

0.2

1

V

0

0

0 0 0 0.6

0

0

0

0

0.1

0.2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.2

Y

N

N

0

0.5

0.5

H/L

4

3

0.6

0.4

0.3

0.6

0.1

M

0

0

0.7

0.6

0.4

0.6

0.2

N/A

1

0

0.5

0.1

0.4

0.1

0

1

0

0

0.5

0.5

0.1

1

0.7

N

N

N

N

N

N

1

0.3

0.5

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

N/A

N/A

N N

3 4

0

0

1M

3M

0

0.1

V/H

0.5

V

0.1

0.3

N/A

N/A

0.1

,8

1

1

V/H

0.5

0

0.3

0

0.5

V/H

0.3

4

mhm2145

N

N

Y

N

N

N

4

1

0

3M

30M

0

0.3

0

0.5

V/H

0.3

5

NYC Zoning Element

rhl2111

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

4

1

0

3M

30M

0

0.3

0

0.5

V/H

0.3

0.5

V/H

6 7 8 9 10

Rain_Retention Module Mondrian Surface VoidPAL Solar Lighting Room Maker Hot Swap

bl2402 jab2315 kmd2148 vhr2102 bl2399 gc2456 jr3099

N Y Y N N N N

N Y N N N N

N

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

N

Y N

N Y Y N Y Y

4 4 4 4 4 4

1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0

3M 3M 3M 3M 3M 3M

30M 30M 30M 30M 30M 30M

0

0.3

0

0.3

0

0.3

0 0 0

0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

0 0 0 0 0 0

0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

V/H V/H V/H V/H V/H

0

N

0

0

N

0.1

N

0 N

0

0

N

N N

0

0

0.1

Y

N

N

Y

N

Y

0.5

5

4

0

0.6

1

M

0

1

3

0.1 0.5 0.5

0.5 0.3 0.3

0.8 0.5 0.7

0

0.5

4

1

0

0.5

0.5

N/A

1/vb/action

1

0.5

0.2

0.3

0.9

0

0.6

6

9

0.1

0.3

0.3

N/A

VB

VB

0.2

0.2

0.9

N

N

Y

N

0.8

8

0

0.5

0.2

0.5

H/ M / L

1

0

0.8

0.3

1

10

0.2

0.5

N

Y

N

N

N

Y

N

0.8

8

0

0.5

0.2

1

L

1

0

0.2

0.8

0.2

0.5

N

N

N

N

N

N

Y

0.8

8

0

0.5

0.2

1

0

0.2

0.8

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0.3

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.5 0.5

N

0.5

Y

0.5

Y

0.5

Y

0.5

N

N Y N N Y

N N N N N

N N N N N

N N N Y N

0.1

N Y N N N

0.8

Y

0.8

Y

0.8

N

0.8

N

0.8

Y

V/H

30M

0

0.5

V/H

Y

N

N

N

4

1

0

1M

10M

0.2

1

0.1

N/A

H

0.3

L

Multi-Section Surface

1

1

0.1

0.1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.5

N

N

N

N

4

0

0

1M

3M

0.1

1

0.2

1

H

0.2

Volume

Fill

1

1

0.5

0.1

0.6

0

0

0

1

0

0

0.2

29

Adaptive Phenotypical Membrane

54

Light Void

26

Spatial Face Lift

0.2

0.5

Y

N

N

N

N

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

0.8

0.5

3M

N

0.3

0.5

1 0

kj2205

N

N

Y

N

N

N

5

0

0

0.5M

1

0.1

1

H/V/D

0.5

S/V

Blend

1

1

0.5

0.2

0

0

1

1

0

0

jer2161

Y

N

N

Y

Y

Y

4

0

0

5M

5M

0

1

0.1

0.1

V

0.1

S

E

1

100

0.4

0.5

0.7

Y

N

N

N

N

Y

ydk2105

N

N

N

N

N

N

4

1

0

3M

10M

0.2

0.7

0.2

0.2

H

0.2

S

Surface Join

1

1

0.4

0.1

0.1

0

0

0

0

0

0.4

0.8 0.8

0 Y

8

8 8 8 8 8 8 8

0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8

0

4

2

0

0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

0.5

0.1

0.2

VB*1

0

0 1

N

0

M

0

0

1 0.8

Y

0

0.5

N/A

N/A

1 0.5

0

0.5

1

0 0 N

0

0

0.5

0 0.5

0.2

0

2

0

0.3 0.3

0.2

0

4

5

0.5 0.6

1

0.8

0.5

9

1 10

0.8

N

N

1 1 1

N

0

0

0.1

0.2

0.5

Fill

N

3M

0 0

0.2 0.5

0.5

Surface Join

1

0.5

0.6

Multi-Section Surface

N

0

30M

1 1

0.5 0.8

0.8

Join Tube, Fill

1

1

0.8 0.3

1

V

rym2104

1

3M

1 1 1

2 1

1

S

sss2143

4

0

F

7 0

S/V

nyw2105

N

1

E

L M / L

volume

Water Curtain

N

4

Line/Join

0.7

0.2

Breeze Fins

Y

N

S

0

0.2

Fly Trap Balcony

N

Y

L/S

1

0.2

34

N

N

H H/V

31

13

Wind Balcony

1

V

0.2

0.3

N/A N/A

0.1

11

0

0.5 0.3

N/A N/A

1M 1M

3M

0.5

5M

5M 30M

0 0

2M

5M

10M

2M 3M

1 1

1

2M

0 0

4 4

0

0

1 0

N

1

0

2 4

12

N

N

Y

5

0

0.4

0.6

0 0

0.5

1

1

0.4

1

0.9

0.3

0

7 0

0.5

1

Fill/Swip

Y

0.4 0.4

0.5 0.7

4

1

N/A

S/V

N

0.2 0.3

1

1

L

0.2

Y

0.1 0.3

5

F

0.2

H

N

0.1 0.7

10

0.3

H/V

N

3 1

0.5

H

0.8 N/A

Y

0 1

0.5

1

0 N/A

N

1 1

0.5

0.9

N

0 0

0.4

N/A

N

M N/A N/A

0.3

N/A

N

N/A

0.5

0.1

N

0.2 0.6

0.7

N/A

N

0.7

0.7

N/A

N

0 0.2

0.4

0.7

0

3M

N

0.7

0.3

3

30M

N

0

0.7

0 1

1

100M

N

0.5

2

5

1M

Y

0 0.1

2

2

0.6

0.6

H

Y

1

0.2

1

0.2

1

0.2

1

0.2

1

0.2

1

0.2

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0

0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

0.2

0.8

0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

Wind Direction

0.8 0.8

1

0

0.2

0.5

0.2

0.2

N/A

0.7

0.1

0

0.4

1

N/A

1

0

0.5

0.3

0.4

1

N/A

0.1

0.6

0.5

0.5

0.2

2

Privacy

0.5

0.4

H

3M

Y

1 0

2

0.5

N/A

3M

Y

7

8

0.3

0.6 0.8

0.8

0

Y

9 8

10 15

0 0.8 0.6 0.4

0.7

3

Y

0.6 0.7 0.3

0

0.5

0

N

0.5

0 1/VB/Action

0.7

1

Y

0.1

0.5

0

0

0.7

1

Y

0.5

0.2

0.8

0

1 1

0

0

N

0.6

0.4

0.4

L N/A N/A N/A

0

5

N

0.7

0.5

0.8

0

1 1 0.8

1

3

N

0.6

0.5

0

48!!!

0.5 0.5 0.3

2

4

N

0.7

1

1

N/A

0

5

N

Y

0

0

N/A

0.8

0.6

0.7

8

N

N

2

M

0.9

0.7

2 4 3

0.8

Y

N

0.3 0.5

0.7

0

4

0.4

N

N

0.7 0.5

0.3

0

1

Y

N

0.1 0.5

0

3

0

N

N

N

4 7

9

0.8

N

N

6 6

0.6

0.3

Y

Y

10

0.1

0.5

N

Y

6??

0.7

0.4

N

bl2376

6

0.2 0.8

0.8 0.2

0

N

jc3472

0.9 N

0

Y

ab3269

0.7

N/A

0.5

0

N

stm2123

0.8

0

N

alm2212

0.1

0 0.7

0

N

ang2130

0.1

0.8

0

Y

mro2110

0.3 0.2

0

0

5

0.2

Y

ReConnect

1 1

1

0.8

VB

0

N

Solar Parasite + DÄ ILYGHTYNG

2 1/vb/action

L

0

N/A

Y

jb3261

Power Scape

L N/A

1

0.1

tal2120

Reflectable Light Facade

1 1

0.7

1

0

0.7

cmn2125

The Drip Trombe

1 0.7

0.6

N

Tripper Canopy

Algae Canopy | Algae Chandelier

9

0.2

THERMAIR System

ETFE Tensile Skin Facade

0 0.5

0

0.1

Infra-Structure

1

5 7

0

0.6

37

39

0

2 7

0.5

0.5

45

25

V

0 0

0.6

0.6

1 0.5

N

0

57

Peak Load Billboard

0

0.5

0.8

8

L

0.1 0.1

N N

Y

N

0.4

0.5

Extrude / Fill

0.1

N Y

N

Y

1

0.3

0.3

H

N Y

N

N

1

0.4

V/H

1

N N

N

N

F

1

H

0.5

Y N

Y

sh2972

V

Multi-Section Surface

1

0

Y N

bcb2129

0.2

S

0.2

jlf2158 mkz2105

Day [Lightwell]

0

0

N

N

0

0

0.5

1

Y

0.7

0.4

0.9

1

0.3

10

1

Reflect Facade

0

0 0 Y

0

0

1

1

Blend/Join

1

N

N

0

0

1

Surface Join

Surface

The Origamus

0

0

N

0

0

F

S

0.3

0

N

1

Y

0

S

0.1

H

NVAT

Y

0

N

0.4

V/H

1

3

0.3

0

0.8

H/V

0

0.8

0 0

0.2

0.5

0.5

0

0 0

0

0 0

N/A

1

0 0

0.6

0.5 N/A

N/A

47

0 N

1

0.7

0 N/A

10M

Y

1 N

0

0.7

10M 20M

3M

N

0.1

0

0.1

2M 2M

1

Y

0.3

0.8

0 0

0

Y

1

0.5

1 1

4

N

1

0.6

0.2

3 4

N

N

Surface Join

1

0

Y Y

Y

V/S

0

Y

Y

0.3

0.4

N

jm3544

H

1

Y

sc2840

N/A

1

N

kvn2104

N/A

Surface Join MultiSection/Fill

N

hsb2125

10M

0

N

0

2M

N/A

N

0

0

N/A

Y

3

0

0

Y

N

4

0

Y

N

N

4

N

N

N

N

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

N

Y

N

N

Y

N

Y

Y

pms2143

Y

N

ojm2111

35

0.2 0.8

N

N

anh2124

53

0.2

0.7

Y

N

Pattern

0.6

0.6 0.5

0.4

0.7

Y

pma2119

27

0.4 0.7 0.5

1

0

Y

Kayden Plaza Generator

63

0.6

0.7 0.5

1

3

Y

Y

Hydroponic Atrium

0.6

0 0

0

M

N

Y

Plug-in Solarium

0.8

0 2

L

0

N

Y

Modular Roof Truss

1

L M

0.5

N

N

Solar AbsorbaTron

0

0.4 0.6

1 0.5

Y

Y

Planks Panel

0.5

0.6 0.8

Y

Y

50

0.8 0.9

1 0.5

Y

Y

38

0 0

0 1

N

gp2313

Parametric Horizontal Lightshaft

0 0

4 12

Y

jjw2142

Habitat Attack!

4 9

0.2

N

bab2141

Stormwater Bioretention Pockets

0.8

0.9

N

cgs2132

Window Water Chamber

0.8

0

Hotbox

Active Thermal Envelope

0.5

0.5

Y

Interceptor 2010!

24

0 0

0

N

Turbine Covering

44

0

cp2488

30

22

0 0

sy2359

56

52

0

abc2159

18

17

0.8

RainRoof Re-Duck

33

0.1

5M

0

1

5

Solar Ivy 2.0

16

H

0.5 N/A

N/A

0

0

0

N

28

19

1

0 N/A

1

8

Y

N

61

20

3M

0.9

4

N

N

Y

Social Carver

0

N/A

N

N

Y

Y

Kaleidoscope Wall

1

N/A

N

N

Y

N

21

4

0.1

N

Y

N

Y

32

N

N/A

N

N

N

48

Y

N/A

Y

N

cw2579

N

50M

Y

cra2111 lbw2133

Parametric ceiling System

N

30M

ceh2157

Wormhole

N

10M

jbs2183

EarthAirWaterTower Atrium Element for Multi-Building Connectivity Active Urban Infrastructure

58

N

2M

Scaffolding

41 55

C_ SCORING SYSTEM CULTURE

COORDINATABILITY

N

0

0.7

0.2

V/H

N

Y

0.5

1

0.5

0.9

VEGETATION

0

1

1

0.5

0.5

N

1

F

0.5M

0

Y

L

S

2M

0

1

WATER

0

S

0.3

0

0

0.1

N

0.6

V/H

1

4

0.1

N

H/V

N/A

4

N

1

HEAT GAIN/ LOSS

0.1 0.8

N/A

N/A

Y

N

??

Y

H N/A

N/A

0.8

N

N

1

INCREASED DAYLIGHTING

N/A N/A

N/A

0

N

N

3

0.5

N/A N/A

0.9

N/A

Y

Y

N/A

PROGRAM SENSITIVITY

N/A N/A

0

5M 5M

Y

N

N/A

1

N/A N/A

10M

Y

jrj2115

Multi-Section Surface

AS MAIN STURCTURE

5M 100M

1M

rac21279

L

PREFABABILITY

2M

bms2145

The Leaf Open-Air Canopy

L

SUSTAINABILITY

3M

Tensile Shader

60 42

S

PROGRAM

FORMULAS DERIVE FROM RATING

CULTURE

NUMERICAL RATINGS OF ELEMENT CHARACTERISTICS

PERFORMATIVE

CATALOGING CRITERIA (TYPE)

0.8 0.3

0.5

2

0

0

0.2

0

1

0.7

24

26

0.2

0.3

0.5

M

0

15

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.6

2

0

0

0.2

0.2

N/A

0

0

0.2

0.1

0.5

Solar Gain

OpenRng x 0.5 + DpthRng x 0.3 + PrgrmSnstv x 0.2

ELEMENT INSTANTIATION_ CULTURAL TOWER CONCEPT

OPEN RATIO

Pattern

Low ventilation shafts stainless steel frame

Culture score= 0.8 Geometric Flexibility= 0.67

Privacy

High

terra cotta panels

concrete floor slab

ceilng technical area

glass curtain wall

steel bearing beams

Intersticity I 2012 gsapp I


D_ INSTANTIATION PUBLIC COORDINATABILITY

SUSTAINABILITY

GREEN Garden

SIGHTSEEING Sky Deck

OPEN SPACE Terrace Plaza

Win x 0.4 + DyLt x 0.3 + Heat x 0.1 + Engy x 0.1 + Wtr x 0.05+ Vgt x 0.05

GeoSmp x 0.6 + GeoVry x 0.3 + Crv x 0.2

SPORT GYM Dance studio

CULTURE Art Gallery

ACADEMIA Language School Public Library Research Labs

CULTURE

LEISURE

Museum

Cinema SPA

RESTAURANT

InstSmp x 0.5 + GeoFlx x 0.3 + SmlSns x 0.2

IN BETWEEN

PRIVATE

GEOMETRIC FLEXIBILITY

Restaurant Lounge Cafe

SHOPPING

OFFICE Office

HOTEL Standard room Suite

RESIDENCE Apartment Penthouse

SERVICE Hair Salon Bank Post Office Day Care Center

Department Store Boutique shops

ELEMENT INSTANTIATION_ CULTURAL TOWER

Culture score= 0.8 Geometric Flexibility= 0.67

CONCEPT

OPEN RATIO

Pattern

Low

Privacy

High

020


Cultural Tower

Intersticity I 2012 gsapp I


022


Cultural Tower

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0.45 75.43 4.38 0.81 0.48

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0.52 77.31 5.32 0.78 0.48

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0. 91 13 0. 0.

0.24 74.65 4.53 0.84 0.32 OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0.79 72.75 9.42 0.42 0.77 OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

Intersticity I 2012 gsapp I

0.88 89.55 -7.45 0.32 0.21

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0.69 103. -44. 0.16 0.10


HA VA PR SG

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

-

Horizontal Angle (deg) Virtical Angel (deg) Privacy Ratio Solar Gain

0.68 187.95 84.83 0.79 0.42

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

.76 1.73 3.90 .69 .73

9 .50 .30 6 0

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0.34 122.35 7.35 0.75 0.34

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG: OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0.16 126.82 6.88 0.69 0.25

0.58 188.45 82.33 0.67 0.57

0.76 238.41 26.77 0.38 0.40

0.22 123.54 7.84 0.85 0.21

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0.43 110.30 -35.80 0.37 0.09

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0.87 244.39 -12.84 0.42 0.27

0.12 137.48 -12.45 0.63 0.13

024


PR - Privacy Ratio SG - Solar Gain

SG: 0.42 OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

Sustainable Tower

0.22 123.54 7.84 0.85 0.21

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

Wind 3pm

Intersticity I 2012 gsapp I

NAME: Kuwait Intl Airport LOCATION: KW T

0.68 187.95 84.83 0.79 0.42

0.87 244.39 -12.84 0.42 0.27

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0.69 103.50 -44.30 0.16 0.10


OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0.76 91.73 13.90 0.69 0.73

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0.58 188.45 82.33 0.67 0.57

0.76 238.41 26.77 0.38 0.40

0.12 137.48 -12.45 0.63 0.13

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0.34 122.35 7.35 0.75 0.34

OR: HA: VA: PR: SG:

0.43 110.30 -35.80 0.37 0.09

0.16 126.82 6.88 0.69 0.25

026


Vertical Typologies I 2013 gsapp I


Cities are ever-changing entities. Old and shabby urban spaces are reshaped and transformed day by day to improve the living conditions of its inhabitants, thus working as a social agent. However, new environments created in the redevelopment of the city oftentimes establish a noticeable frontier with pre-

02

Vertical Typologies 2013 SPRING STUDIO GSAPP INSTRUCTOR: JUAN HERREROS , JOSÉ ARAGÜEZ

existing conditions, hence not achieving the desired integration and public activation. Located in a peripheral area of Chinatown in New York, the site is placed adjacent to a set of modern buildings that substituted a notorious overcrowded slum. The redevelopment of the area included large parks, massive governmental constructions and high-rise apartment buildings. Consequently, it broke the continuity of uses and volumes of the traditional urban fabric composed of tenements, as well as its scale. Positioned at the border of two milieus, the site includes a large park at one side and extremely dense residential buildings at the other. My strategy proposes to introduce a new blending filter, the “Vertical Typologies” as an opportunity to mediate between the two divergent urban densities. With the inclusion of this new intermediating scale, the prolific set of activities of Chinatown would extend to the new area, at the same time that its congested urban fabric would be alleviated with the new open horizontal and vertical space.

028


Between block attack buildings and tenement apartments URBAN SCALE _block attack in NYC BLOCK ATTACK AREA

SITE_ BLOCK ATTACK BOUNDARY

UNATTACKED AREA

COLUMBUS PARK , CHINATOWN

NEIGHBORHOOD SCALE _Block attack At Chinatown 1 BLOCK ATTACK BUILDING AREA > 200 APARTMENTS TENEMENT

VOLUMETRIC SCALE VARIATION

APARTMENTS TENEMENT

BLENDING FILTER_ Strategy PUBLIC SPACE IN BLOCK ATTACK AREA

FRAGMENTED PUBLIC SPACE

BLEND

FRAGMENTED APARTMENTS TENEMENT

APARTMENTS TENEMENT IN CHINATOWN AREA

Vertical Typologies I 2013 gsapp I


030


FRAGMENTED PUBLIC SPACE V FROM BLOCK ATTACK AREA

FRAGMENTED TENEMENT APARTMENT BUILDINGS FROM CHINATOWN

032


Vertical Typologies A

B

C

D

E

OPEN SPACE

INTERIOR SPACE

POROSITY & FAR P

F

P

F

F

P

G

F

P

H

F

P

I

F

J

OPEN SPACE

INTERIOR SPACE

POROSITY & FAR P

F

Vertical Typologies I 2013 gsapp I

P

F

P

F

P

F

P

F


A

B

C

D

E

TYPICAL BUILDINGS

F

G

H

I

J

ORIGINAL BUILDINGS

VERTICAL TYPOLOGIES HOUSING URBAN OPEN SPACE TOTAL = 345,000 SQ.FT.

COLUMBUS PARK URBAN OPEN SPACE = 145,000 SQ.FT.

034


Vertical Typologies Plan

A

Vertical Typologies I 2013 gsapp I

B

C

D

E


F

G

H

I

J

036


Vertical Typologies I 2013 gsapp I


038


Vertical Typologies I 2013 gsapp I


040


Grid Off Grid I 2012 gsapp I


03

Grid Off Grid 2012 SUMMER STUDIO GSAPP INSTRUCTOR: FLORIAN IDENBURG, JING LIU Modernity has been fostered for 200 years in Manhattan by the city grid. Its illusory rigidity allows for improvised and disordered elements to adhere to the system and the urban fabric. The site of this studio is located Union Square, a public square sectioned diagonally by Broadway, creating a 3 block void full of activities and interaction, but also anomalies and conflicts. The project attempts to use Bio-incubators as a means to explore the nature of autonomy in work and the need to elude the aggressive external conditions of the area. The operative strategy is inspired by the negotiation between the disturbance produced by the existing organization in New York and its work system. Therefore, several types of modulated units, emulating the city grid, compose the proposed Bioincubator. These modules are placed underground, creating a new level of working space, as well as a different elevation for the characteristic vegetation of Union Square. The juxtaposition of the units provides privacy, individuality when desired, in addition to publicity and social collaboration in distinctive areas.

042


Conflicts Translation THREE OBJECTIVES

UNIT ARRANGEMENT IN INCUBATOR STUDY

REARRANGING UNITS

n NS + NW + NH + NO + NL = 1 UNIT

Grid Off Grid I 2012 gsapp I

S

storage

n

W

wash sink

n

H

n

n hood (n=2x) n

O

office (n=2x)

L

lab (n>1)

P

path (n=2)


URBAN PLANNING ELEMENTS ACTIVITIES

PATTERN

VEGETATION

Mon

Tue

Wed

Fri

Sat

Sun

Thu

Lawn

Subway

Ground

Tree

City

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

044


Grid Off Grid I 2012 gsapp I


down

down

-118.000 down

-118.000

down

-154.000

down

down

up

-118.000

exit

down -118.000 down

exit up

up

up

B1 FLOOR PLAN

STRATEGY OF REARRANGING ELEMENTS Path

Subway

Vegetation

Remixing Layers

Study Process 1

Study Process 2

046


Grid Off Grid I 2012 gsapp I


048


Other Works I 2012-13 gsapp I


04

Other Works X INFORMATION MODELING 2013 Spring Visual studies GSAPP Instructor: Luc Wilson TECHNIQUES OF THE ULTRAREAL 2012 Fall Visual studies GSAPP instructor: Christopher C Hoxie, Kevin Scott Cimini RESPONSIVE SKIN 2012 FALL C-BIP studio GSAPP Instructor: David Benjamin, Adam W. Modesitt OTHER DESIGN 2013 Spring Visual studies GSAPP instructor: Michael J. Rock

050


X Information Modeling _ PARAMETRIC SITE ANALYSIS , PARAMETRIC MASSING + OPTIMIZATION INSTRUCTOR: LUC WILSON SOFTWARE : RHINO, GRASSHOPPER, GALAPAGOS

SUNLIGHT MEASUREMENT MOST LIGHT

This workshop focus on developing flexible design systems founded on a holistic approach to economic, environmental, and social problems that will allow for speculation on many possible futures for the city. Using this meth-

SPRING

odology, termed X-Information Modeling or XIM, we will leverage parametric design tools to create systems that strategically integrate diverse objectives, and through Grasshopper for Rhino, visualize potential scenarios for a more informed decision making process.

PROGRAM SUMMER

SUNLIGHT

FALL

WINTER

OPTIMIZATION A_LOW RESOLUTION

Other Works I 2012-13 gsapp I

MEDIUM SHADOWS

MOST SHADOWS


OPTIMIZATION SETUP PROCESS FITTNESS 01_ IDEAL PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION

VARIABLES GENE FROM GALAPAGOS GENE POOL

x 0.2 = Commercial Space 15

Commercial Space Collective Space

77

X 77

FITNESS 02_ PROGRAM RELATIONSHIP

x 0.3 = Collective Space 23 x 0.5 = Residential Space 39

Residential Space

COMBINING FINESSES FITNESS 01_ I RESIDENTIAL UNIT SIZE - IDEAL RESIDENTIAL UNIT SIZE I + I COMMERCIAL UNIT SIZE- IDEAL COMMERCIAL UNIT SIZE I + I COLLECTIVE SPACE UNIT SIZE- IDEAL COLLECTIVE SPACE UNIT SIZE I =A FITNESS 02_ DIST (RESIDENTIAL ATTRACTOR, RESIDENTIAL UNITS ) X DIST (COMMERCIAL ATTRACTOR, COMMERCIAL UNITS) X DIST (COLLECTIVE SPACE UNITS, RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL UNITS) X =B

FITNESS 03_ RESIDENTIAL OBSTRUCTED SRF SIZE / ALL RESIDENTIAL SRF SIZE =C

FITNESS 03_ BUILDING SCALE

FINAL FITNESS = A/16 + B/ 3240000000000 + C--> MINIMIZE Commercial attractor

Commercial Space Collective Space Residential attractor Residential Space vs view obstruction rate

OPTIMIZATION B_ HIGH RESOLUTION

052


Techniques Of The Ultrareal INSTRUCTOR: CHRISTOPHER C HOXIE, KEVIN SCOTT CIMINI SOFTWARE: 3D MAX, VRAY The workshop explored the multiple techniques and tactics of rendering-- sketch, visualize, analyze, quantify and synthesize. The architectural rendering captures the energy of an idea about space, while contemporary rendering techniques have enabled the architect to embed more information, with greater intent, into a single image.

Other Works I 2012-13 gsapp I


054


Other Works I 2012-13 gsapp I


056


Responsive Skin INSTRUCTOR: DAVID BENJAMIN, ADAM W. MODESITT SOFTWARE: CATIA As a project in the first phase of the C-BIP studio, we explored new forms of technology-enabled collaboration within and between the different fields of architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Equipped with the use of the CATIA software, we developed a building component addressed to one or more architectural issues. Afterwards, we worked with elements developed by C-BIP students in order to apply them in our operative strategy.

Other Works I 2012-13 gsapp I


VERTICAL LOUVER

X X

HORIZONTAL BALCONY

A MULTI-FUNCTION FACADE SYSTEM

Our project implemented a faรงade system based on the adaptation to the existing sunlight conditions, optimizing the passive sustainability. The scheme is composed by an arrangement of louvers that are rotated searching for higher efficiency obstructing sunlight. Therefore, horizontal pieces are place at the South and North elevations, while vertical pieces covered the East and West ones. Enhanced by the development of a shading panel that switch the orientation at the corners of the building, the louver system minimizes the thermal increase of the interior while maximizing the indirect light.

HORIZONTAL

VERTICAL

SHADING

SHADING

FROM HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL

VARIATIONS OF HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DIVISIONS ON THE FACADE 058


ELEMENT TYPE 01

OPENNESS

HIGH

LOW

PRIVACY

LOW

HIGH

LOUVER _PRIVACY _OPEN RATIO

LOUVER DEPTH

LOW

HIGH

Balcony Plane Always keeps horizontal and not affected by the location of Input points

ELEMENT TYPE 01 Facade System Division -->Horizontal Division=7 --> Vertical Division = 7

ELEMENT TYPE 01 Facade System Division -->Horizontal Division=7 --> Vertical Division = 7

ELEMENT TYPE 01 Facade System Division -->Horizontal Division=6 --> Vertical Division = 7

Other Works I 2012-13 gsapp I

BALCONY _FLOOR AREA


ELEMENT TYPE 02

Louver System is connected to balcony which directly affect the openness of the balcony. The open and close of the louver is controlled by two tangent curves.

LOUVER _Privacy _Open Ratio BALCONY _Floor Area

FLOOR AREA

LOW

HIGH

PRIVACY

HIGH

LOW

OPEN RATIO

LOW

HIGH

ELEMENT TYPE 02 Facade System Division -->Horizontal Division=2 --> Vertical Division = 8

ELEMENT TYPE 02 Facade System Division -->Horizontal Division=6 --> Vertical Division = 3

ELEMENT TYPE 02 Facade System Division -->Horizontal Division=3 --> Vertical Division = 7

060


Adaptive Formulations INSTRUCTOR: ADAM W. MODESITT SOFTWARE: CATIA This workshop explored the use of CATIA and parametric modeling as an architectural design tool. In this workshop we examined what it means for architectural design to manage and control large data sets, complex geometries and systems. We explored questions about the limits of computer modeling in scale, material and resolution.

Other Works I 2012-13 gsapp I


062


MUSE I 2007 thu I


05

MUSE

MUSEUM OF URBAN SCAVENGED EQUIPMENTS

2007 THESIS DESIGN TUNG HAI UNIVERSITY INSTRUCTOR: CHUNTEI DAVID TSENG Due to the booming economy, the quickly upgraded living conditions of Taiwanese inhabitants were epitomized by the flourishing apartment buildings. Built mainly in the mid twentieth century, these constructions established a distinctive urban condition at NanJiChang, in Taipei. A new parasitical skin, consisting in low-tech equipment, wraps most of the buildings facades of the mentioned buildings. Composed by cheap materials, the facilities are used as advertising boards, and as extensions of interior living space. This new and floppy envelope caused multiple structural and sanitary problems around the neighborhood, triggering the determination to demolish them in 2005. As an attempt to reminisce this temporary and vanishing urban experience, my strategy consists in enacting its parasitical nature in a new construction, hence weaving two different spatial conditions. Therefore, the envelope of the new building works as an interpretation and a transformation of the NanJiChang urban experience adapted to the new reality.

064


Parasitic covers on buildings’ envelope

EXTRACTING EQUIPMENT FROM FACADE

EQUIPMENT RELOCATING IN NEW CONSTRUCTION Frame and framed

Pushed cubes Connections

Connections Breaks

Breaks/ In between space

Remnant walls

Steel cotainers Tumor

Steel windows In Between

Floating wall Banners Message

Axial passage Connections

Connections Breaks/ In between space

Machines Operate

Braces Structure

MUSE I 2007 thu I

Breaks


066


Positive & Negative

EXHIBITION VENUE +1210 CM

+1210 CM

+1510 CM

+1510 CM

3ND FLOOR PLAN +1650CM SCALE=1:600

“Negative”[black area] represents the space installed with scavenged equipment came from NanJiChang neighborhood. “Positive” [white area] represents the space that is modernized building frame.

+910 CM

MUSE I 2007 thu I

+1210 CM

+3010 CM

+3310 CM


+910 CM

EXHIBITION VENUE +610 CM

+610 CM

2ND FLOOR PLAN +1050CM SCALE=1:600

Driveway + Equipment system

DRIVE WAY

EQUIPMENT

Insertion of service core +Exhibition volume

CORE

EXHIBITION VOLUME

Insertion of vegetation+ connections between exhibition volumes

CONNECTION VEGETATION

Adjustments between exhibition and parking areas

Insertion of scattered and smaller exhibition rooms around main exhibition volumes

AFFILIATED EXHIBITION SPACE

EQUIPMENT SYSTEM

068


Recurrence of vanishing experience

MUSE I 2007 thu I


070


Monster Inc. I 2006 thu I


06

Happy Life After School 2006 FALL STUDIO TUNG HAI UNIVERSITY INSTRUCTOR: DAVID HONG Design is our response to environment, interaction, social structure and programmatic system. Our ideas are often preconceived and restricted by deep-rooted values in our society. In this project, I attempt to develop a conceptual thinking based on the reaction as an abnormality of a monster. The normalization of the monster to fit in our society and be compatible with society is the logic explored in this exercise in order to avoid the received ideas. Focuses on Taiwanese culture of after-school classes, the project aims to provide an alternative to the distorted notion that people´s success is evaluated depending on all kinds of ranking and certification. There, in the local Cram Schools, the knowledge is condensed and acquired more efficiently than in the official educational system. My approach to the future educational space in Taiwan is a mutation of the Cram School, enhanced by the interaction activities commonly provided by the traditional schools. The new prototype offers gyms as real sport fields, study rooms as real libraries, and circulation as real meeting places. Thus, the enriched and improved Cram Schools become the new real educational methodology for the Taiwanese students.

072


If designing a building is like creating a monster ? ANALYZING MONSTERS

Subject composite

Part intensify

Part infill

Trigger by medium

Camouflage

Part deform

Part collage

A+B(50%/ 50%)

A+a(>100%)= A+/ A(Magnify/lessen/quantity)

A+b (>50%/ <50%)

A+c= B / B+d=A (status change via mediumc&d)

A= B (status change with no medium)

A- a+ b= A’

a+b+c (Intangible subject)

MONSTER MAKING FORMULA Select objects Random

Merge type

Form Structure/ Mechanism 1st Rationalization

Insert texture 2nd Rationalization

+ %(A)

A

+ n(A)

A±a

Single

± %(a) ± n(a)

A+B

AB

Dual

START

+ %(A)

+ %(B)

+ n(A)

+ n(B)

a

± %(a)

± %(b)

B

A

± n(a)

± n(b)

b

+ %(A)

+ %(B)

A

+ n(A)

+ n(B)

a

± %(a)

± %(b)

B

± n(a)

± n(b)

b

+ %(A)

+ %(b)

A

+ n(A)

A+b

a

± %(a) ± n(a)

a+b+c+d...

Multiple

a

b

+ n(b)

+ %(a)

+ n(a)

a

+ %(b)

+ n(b)

b

+ %(c)

+ n(c)

c

+ %(d)

+ n(d)

d

skin (PQ) material (PQ)

skin (PQRS) material (PQRS) skin (PQRS)

MONSTER

material (PQRS) skin (PQRS) material (PQRS)

skin (PQRS) material (PQRS)

FORMULA TESTING_ MONSTER NO.01/02/03 Honey comb Little jellyfish

Furly coat

Symbiosis organisms help transfer food into energy Tubes filter organisms Anetenna with venom

gates relasing little jellyfish

Translucent membrane

Grounding tool

Skin produces muscular waves of contraction

little jellyfishs

Transformed key

Rotatable ring

transporting tunnel

Photosynthetic atenna

Jellyfish cabin

A± a

n(A) %(A) %(a )

Monster Inc. I 2006 thu I

A

A+ B

%(A) n(A) %(B) %(a ) n(B) n(a )

A b

a+ b+c

%(a ) %(b ) %(c )

n(b) n(c)

a b c


MONSTER NO.4_ ABOUT A HAPPY LIFE AFTER SCHOOL

BASIC SCHOOL

INTENSE PROGRAMS & FACILITIES

THE AFTER SCHOOL SYSTEM

Study rooms

Sport field

Crammed class

Intense sport

Classrooms

Library

Intensive reading

Classroom

Medium

Fitness Center

Lockers

Hallway

Group Gathering

Plazas

Toilet

Privacy

Passages

Relax

Sauna

Vertical

Circulation

074


The real school is starting after school

1700

1715

1730

1745

1800

1815

1830

1845

1900

1915

1930

1945 2000

2015

2030

2045

2100

2115

2130

2145

2200

2215

2230

2245

2300

2315

1700

1715

1730

1745

1800

1815

1830

1845

1900

1915

1930

1945 2000

2015

2030

2045

2100

2115

2130

2145

2200

2215

2230

2245

2300

2315

1700

1715

1730

1745

1800

1815

1830

1845

1900

1915

1930

1945 2000

2015

2030

2045

2100

2115

2130

2145

2200

2215

2230

2245

2300

2315

2215

2230

2245

2300

2315

timetables

1700

1715

1730

1745

1800

1815

1830

1845

1900

1915

Check in/ out

Monster Inc. I 2006 thu I

1930

1945 2000

2015

Crammed course

2030

2045

2100

Self study

2115

2130

2145

2200

Sauna/ fitness programs

Leisure activities


Locker ( quantity = 900 )

Study room B (

Study room D (

= 70 )

Shower (

= 20)

= 50 ) Basketball court

Study room E (

Study room A (

= 70 )

= 70 )

Medium size classroom ( = 200 )

Shower (

= 20 )

Study room C (

= 100 )

076


Urban Pure Land I 2005 thu I


07

Urban Pure Land 2005 FALL STUDIO TUNG HAI UNIVERSITY INSTRUCTOR: CHANG XIU LIN Located in a central area of Taichung, the site is surrounded by medium sized apartment buildings developed in the 1950s. The intersection of the â&#x20AC;&#x153;Taichung Port Rdâ&#x20AC;? defines its characteristic triangular shape, creating a spot of activity concentration, destined to religious services and affordable lodging. The proposed strategy divides the bulky required volume into different chunks designed for each use, rotating them to enable the sunlight to get inside and the vegetation to grow vertically. This division into smaller volumes is a response to the corner condition aiming to blend with the contextual scale.

High-rise buildings

Intersections

Low-rise buildings

078


Urban Pure Land I 2005 thu I


Ground Floor Plan S:1/1000

Church

Church activities

High level typical

Hostel

Vertical circulation

Open plaza

Encircled wall

ROTATING CHUNK

1.5F Book Store Plan

2F Church Plan

4F Garden Cafe Plan

S:1/800

S:1/800

S:1/800

7F Activity Center Plan

8-11F Hostel Plan

12F Hostel Plan

S:1/800

S:1/800

S:1/800

080


Professional Works I 2008 - 2011 I


08

Professional Works WITH TSAI&LEE ASSOCIATES

THE GREAT ROOTS FORESTRY SPA RESORT BUILT

LINYI ST. APARTMENT AT TAIPEI UN BUILT

TAIPEI ARENA METRO STATION COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX IN PROGRESS

CONDOMINIUM AT PING-JEN CITY IN PROGRESS

TECHNOLOGY BUILDING AT JHONGLI CITY BUILT

082


The Great roots forestry spa resort Project description: A five-star hotel built on a hillside with 109 guest rooms [ Built ] Client: The great roots forestry spa resort Site area: 72,570 sq.ft. Total area: 212850 sq.ft. Floor: 6F/ B3F

Professional Works I 2008 - 2011 I


Ground Floor Level Plan Scale: 1/800

084


Professional Works I 2008 - 2011 I


Hotel Room Level Plan Scale: 1/800

Section_ Conference Room Area

Section_ Hotel Room Area

Scale: 1/800

Scale: 1/800

086


Condominium at Ping-Jen city [Under Construction] Client: CHONG YI Construction Site area : 59,440 sq.ft. Total area: 309,700 sq.ft. Floor: 12F/ B2F

Professional Works I 2008 - 2011 I


Ground Floor Plan Scale: 1/800

088


Linyi St. apartment at Taipei [In Progress] Client: PU JEN Construction Site area : 16,580 sq.ft. Total area:104170 sq.ft. Floor: 14F/ B3F

Professional Works I 2008 - 2011 I


Ground Floor Plan Scale: 1/800

Apartment Plan Scale: 1/800

090


Taipei Arena Metro Station Commercial/ Residential Complex Project description: BOT with metro station/ creating urban open space& considering urban context/ connecting Metro station underground [ In Progress ] Client: CHIAO THAI HSING ENTERPRISE Co.Ltd Site area : 82,570 sq.ft. Total area: 730,000 sq.ft. Floor: 23F/ B6F

Ground Floor Plan Scale: 1/800

Professional Works I 2008 - 2011 I


Technology building at Jhongli City Project description: High tech factory building/ research center+ conference rooms+ recreation center for workers/ creating image of the corporation/ a smooth, safe and economic circulation/ product line and clean room planning [Built] Client: ETANSI Inc. Site area : 97370 sq.ft. Total area:116540 sq.ft. Floor: 6F/ B1F

Ground Floor Plan Scale: 1/800

092

Portfolio Yu Han Lee  
Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you