Issuu on Google+


 


Feedback
for
the
implementation
of
EADIn
in
the
national/
organizational
 structures
of
the
partner
organizations
 The
EADIn
project
will
be
implemented
within
the
structures
of
the
partner
organizations.
In
 order
to
have
a
structured
record
of
the
national/
organizational
implementations
and
your
 experiences,
please
fill
in
this
form
for
every
intervention
you
organize.
 
 FACTS
 Name
of
Partner
Organization:
Slovenian
anti‐doping
organization
 Date:
10.11.2011
 Length
of
intervention:
1,5
hour
 Location:
Bežigrad
high
school,
Ljubljana
 Number
of
participants:
45
 Target
group/
addressees:
high
school
athletes
 Trainers/
staff/
Anti‐Doping
Junior
Ambassadors
that
were
involved:
Jani
Dvorška,
Nina
 Makuc,
Karmen
Gec,
Matej
Drinovec,
Veronika
Dvoršak,
Tadej
Jug,
Maruša
Končar,
Luka
 Pirec,
Jan
Družina,
Tjaša
Hojnik
 
 REPORT
ABOUT
THE
IMPLEMENTATION
 What
was
the
aim?
 Our
 main
 goal
 was
 to
 inform
 high
 school
 athletes
 about
 the
 problem
 of
 doping
 in
 professional
sport.
 What
content
was
conveyed?
 We
presented
the
case
of
Andreas‐Heidi
Krieger
and
doping
in
East
Germany
between
1970
 and
1990,
followed
by
general
information
on
doping
(the
presentation
of
WADA,
SLOADO,
 “What
is
doping?”,
TUE,
athletes...).
In
the
second
part,
we
used
the
concept
of
workshops,
 with
 which
 we
 wanted
 to
 make
 young
 athletes
 openly
 discuss
 about
 the
 use
 of
 drugs
 in
 sport.
We
divided
people
into
4
groups
and
distributed
paper
sheets
with
different
tasks
all
of
 them
 concerning
 on
 the
 topic
 of
 doping.
Inside
 each
 group
 we
 divided
 athletes
 into
 two
 groups,
one
group
was
for
doping
and
anotrher
one
was
against
doping.
Each
group
had
15
 minutes
 to
 talk
 about
 the
 task
 and
 to
 give
 clear
 answers
 and
 explanations.
 After
 the



discussion
each
group
presented
their
conclusions
to
everybody.
Ambassadors
were
there
to
 guide,
support
and
maybe
help
to
point
them
in
the
right
direction
to
get
the
general
view
on
 the
 given
 issue.
After
 each
 presentation
 we
 had
 time
 to
 answer
 the
 questions
 that
 might
 have
popped
up.
 At
the
end
of
workshops
athletes
had
a
chance
to
sign
a
public
promise,
that
they
will
act
in
 accordanse
 to
 the
 World
 Anti‐Doping
 Code
 and
 that
 they
 will
 not
 use
 any
 prohibited
 substances
or
methods
in
their
sport
career.

 Which
methodologies
were
used?
 Presentation
and
workshops
 What
were
the
impressions
of
the
staff/
trainers/
ADJA?(for
eg:
how
did
the
addressees
 react
to
the
given
information,
was
it
easy
to
convey
the
information,
were
there
 discussions…):
 In
 our
 opinion
 and
 the
 opinion
 of
 teachers
 the
 lecture
 was
 very
 interesting.
 It
 has
 been
 noticed
that
most
of
athletes
do
not
have
a
lot
of
knowledge
about
the
problem
of
doping,
 but
we
could
see
that
they
have
shown
interest
and
cooperation
to
find
out
new
things.
In
 particular,
the
interest
and
surprise
of
all
present
was
shown.
During
the
workshops
most
of
 them
were
talking
and
exchanging
their
views.

 What
were
the
results?
 We
believe
that
all
participants
will
think
about
dangers
of
doping
in
the
future
and
consider
 the
consequences
in
a
different
way
than
they
did
before
our
lecture.
 Did
you
reach
the
desired
outcome?
How?
Why?
 We
think
that
the
responses
of
the
participants
were
good,
because
they
have
learned
a
lot
 new
things.
We
can
say
that
our
goal
was
more
than
successfully
achieved.
 What
were
the
challenges
in
implementing
EADIn
in
your
own
structure?
 No.
 What
would
you
do
differently
next
time?
 We
will
try
with
some
new
workshops,
just
to
see
the
reaction
from
the
athletes.



/gim._Bezigrad__10.11.11