Page 1


 


Feedback
 for
 the
 implementation
 of
 EADIn
 in
 the
 national/
 organizational
 structures
of
the
partner
organizations
 The
EADIn
project
will
be
implemented
within
the
structures
of
the
partner
organizations.
In
 order
to
have
a
structured
record
of
the
national/
organizational
implementations
and
your
 experiences,
please
fill
in
this
form
for
every
intervention
you
organize.
 
 FACTS
 Name
of
Partner
Organization:
Slovenian
anti‐doping
organization
(SLOADO)
 Date:
19.07.2011
 Length
of
intervention:
1
hour
 Location:
Ljubljana,
hotel
Merkator
 Number
of
participants:
42
 Target
 group/
 addressees:
 
 athletes
 who
 will
 compete
 at
 the
 European
 Youth
 Olympic
 Festival
in
Trambzon,
2011
 Trainers/
 staff/
 Anti‐Doping
 Junior
 Ambassadors
 that
 were
 involved:
 Jani
 Dvoršak,
 Nina
 Makuc,
Karmen
Gec,
Danej
Navrboc,,
Veronika
Dvoršak,
Tjaša
Hojnik,
Matej
Drinovec,
Luka
 Pirec,
Sebastian
Bauman,
Tadej
Jug,
Tjaša
Logar
 
 REPORT
ABOUT
THE
IMPLEMENTATION
 What
was
the
aim?
 Our
 main
 goal
 was
 to
 inform
 young
 people
 about
 the
 problem
 of
 doping
 in
 professional
 sport.
 What
content
was
conveyed?
 We
 presented
 the
 case
 of
 Andreas‐Heidi
 Krieger
 and
 other
 doping
 cases
 (Pantani,
 Agassi,
 Raducan
...)
in
summer
sports,
followed
by
general
information
on
doping
(the
presentation
 of
 WADA,
 SLOADO,
 “What
 is
 doping?”,
 TUE,
 athletes...).
We
 also
 made
 a
 presentation
 of
 doping
control
process
and
we
intriduce
athletes
to
all
steps
of
doping
control.
We
showed
 them
 an
 equpment
 for
 collecting
 the
 samples
 and
 explained
 how
 it
 is
 used.
 In
 the
 second
 part,
we
used
the
concept
of
workshops,
with
which
we
wanted
to
make
young
athletes
and
 coaches
openly
discuss
about
the
use
of
drugs
in
sport.
We
divided
people
into
6
groups
and



distributed
 paper
 sheets
 with
 different
 tasks
 all
 of
 them
 concerning
 on
 the
 topic
 of
 doping.
Each
group
had
about
10
minutes
to
talk
about
the
task
and
to
give
clear
answers
 and
 explanations.
 After
 the
 discussion
 each
 group
 presented
 their
 conclusions
 to
 everybody.
Ambassadors
were
there
to
guide,
support
and
maybe
help
to
point
them
in
the
 right
 direction
 to
 get
 the
 general
 view
 on
 the
 given
 issue.
After
 each
 presentation
 we
 had
 time
to
answer
the
questions
that
might
have
popped
up.
 Which
methodologies
were
used?
 Presentation
and
workshops.
 What
 were
 the
 impressions
 of
 the
 staff/
 trainers/
 ADJA?(for
 eg:
 how
 did
 the
 addressees
 react
 to
 the
 given
 information,
 was
 it
 easy
 to
 convey
 the
 information,
 were
 there
 discussions…):
 In
our
opinion
the
lecture
was
very
interesting.
It
has
been
noticed
that
athletes
and
coaches
 do
not
have
a
lot
of
knowledge
about
the
problem
of
doping
(except
from
the
athletes
and
 coaches
of
cycling),
but
we
could
see
that
they
have
shown
interest
and
cooperation
to
find
 out
new
things.
In
particular,
the
interest
and
surprise
of
all
present
was
shown.
During
the
 workshops
everybody
was
talking
and
exchanging
their
views.
Also
coaches
that
participated
 were
set
in
the
role
of
athletes.
 What
were
the
results?
 We
believe
that
all
participants
will
think
abut
dangers
of
doping
in
the
future
and
consider
 the
consequences
in
a
different
way
than
they
did
before
our
lecture.
 Did
you
reach
the
desired
outcome?
How?
Why?
 We
think
that
the
responses
of
the
participants
were
good,
because
they
have
learned
a
lot
 new
things.
We
can
say
that
our
goal
was
more
than
successfully
achieved.
 What
were
the
challenges
in
implementing
EADIn
in
your
own
structure?
 We
didn‘t
have
any
problems.
 What
would
you
do
differently
next
time?
 Nothing.
 
 


/Feedback_for_the_implementation_of_EADIn_-_EYOF_19  

http://www.sloado.si/fileadmin/dokumenti/POROCILA/Feedback_for_the_implementation_of_EADIn_-_EYOF_19.7.11.pdf

Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you