Bakersfield News Observer 05.07.25

Page 1


Trump Admin Erases Decades of School Integration

Bakersfield

Target Boycotts and its Effect on Both Sides of the Black Dollar

of about 10 people gathered in front of the Target at 14th and Columbia Road NW, Washington, DC. Voices raised, as part of a three-day economic blackout from April 18 to April 20, the crowd marched while urging Black and Hispanic shoppers to refrain from purchasing from Target, which has been criticized for its stance on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Ongoing national boycotts launched as a protest against Target’s cessation of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, have ignited a powerful economic and cultural conversation and corresponding action from Black communities across the nation. Backed by spiritual and community leaders, including Pastor Jamal Bryant, who initiated a 40-day fast from shopping at Target, the movement has drawn national attention. The goal is to harness the power of Black dollars to demand respect, representation, and equity.

Despite a steady stream of customers at Target, 14th Street and Columbia Road NW, Washington, DC, many Black employees of the retail giant are reporting economic distress due to company layoffs and a reduction in employee work hours.

Boycotts Heighten Economic Stress for Many African Americans

While many celebrate the boycott as a bold stand for economic justice, its ripple effects have been complicated, especially for many within the very community that it is meant to empower.

Emmy award-winning host, actress, and multiNAACP Image Award winner Tabitha Brown, who has partnered with Target on several successful product lines, expressed concern in a January 2025 livestream over the long-term effects of the Target boycott on Black-owned businesses. “As disheartening as it is for me, I am not the only one affected by this. It is for so many of us who worked so very hard to finally be seen. Contrary to what the world might tell you, it has been very hard for Black-owned businesses to hit shelves,” said Brown.

At Home in San Francisco:

Black and Hispanic street vendors, positioned along the street in front of Target, expressed worry that decreased foot traffic from sustained boycotting will affect their ability to make a living, and possibly put them out of business.

Under immense pressure from boycott participants to pull their products from Target and Walmart shelves, Brown sought to educate the public gently regarding the finances and logistics required to pull products from national stores. “You have to have a place to store it, another place to sell it, which is almost impossible sometimes. Even if you sell online, it’s a process, and everyone does not

Harris’s First Major Speech

Since Election Loss Was

Rousing Call-to-Action

Former Vice-President Kamala Harris delivered her first extensive public remarks since her defeat in the 2024 Presidential Election.

To cheers and a standing ovation, Harris spoke at the 20th Anniversary Gala of Emerge, an organization that recruits and trains Democratic women to run for office. The event was held in San Francisco on April 30.

“Right now, we are living in their vision for America,” said Harris, who some California capital insiders believe will soon announce her candidacy for governor.

“This is not a vision that Americans want. We are living in a moment when the checks and balances upon which we have historically relied have begun to buckle,” continued Harris. “And we here know that when the checks and balances ultimately collapse, if Congress fails to do its part, or if the courts fail to do their part, or if both do their part, but the president defies them anyway, well, friends, that is called a constitutional crisis. And that is a crisis that will eventually impact everyone.”

In her speech, Harris praised Emerge for its work and impact around the United States. Since it was founded in 2002, the organization -- founded in California -- has trained over 6,500 Democratic women to run for office and more than 1,200 alums of the program serve in government today at different levels.

The California division of Emerge has more

than 200 women serving and an extensive list of alumnae preparing to run in upcoming elections across the state.

“I am not here tonight to offer all the answers, but I am here to say this,” Harris continued. “You are not alone, and we are all in this together. And straight talk, things are probably going to get worse before they get better. But we are ready for it. We are not going to scatter. We are going to stand together, everyone a leader, and emerge. You have a special role to play. Organizing is as important as ever. Mobilizing is as important as ever. Running for office is as important as ever. So please, everyone here, please keep doing what you are doing. And to everyone, let’s lock it in.”

A’shanti F. Gholar, President and CEO of Emerge, says she is committed to developing new training strategies and empowering new candidates to help shift the balance of power in the country and combat some of the damaging policies the Trump Administration is trying to enact.

“California is where Emerge began and one of the many states where we have seen extraordinary growth and success,” Gholar told California Black Media. “We’re fortunate to count a number of inspiring candidates and electeds, among our alums in the Golden State, including U.S. Congresswoman Lateefah Simon, Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis, and Controller Malia Cohen, and look forward to continuing to provide our comprehensive training programs that help

women run for office and win.”

Harris also took time to highlight other leaders in Washington who she believes are leading the charge in maintaining the checks and balances politically. She is inspired by Democratic leaders representing points of view across the political spectrum, “including congressional leaders like Cory Booker, Chris Van Hollen, Chris Murphy, Jasmine Crockett, Maxwell Frost, AOC, and Bernie Sanders. All who, in different ways, have been speaking with more this moment so here’s one of the other things I wanted to talk about tonight and to highlight so look some people are describing what’s been happening in recent months as absolute chaos.”

Termed out, California Gov. Gavin Newsom is wrapping up his final stint in office.

A number of pollsters believe Harris would be the frontrunner if she decides to run. A recent survey conducted by Politico and UC Berkeley’s Citrin Center asked “respondents to select from a list of possible emotions about how they felt about Harris running for governor.” Respondents could select multiple options from the list of emotions: joyful, mostly excited, indifferent, outraged, hopeless, or other.

Among registered Democratic voters, 33% felt joyful over her potential run and 41% felt mostly excited, Politico said. Roughly a quarter said they were indifferent, and “negative emotions hovered in the single digits.”

National Correspondent As Target Corporation grapples with a sweeping boycott led by grassroots activists and civil rights groups, the company’s chair and CEO, Brian Cornell, walked away with a pay package worth $20.4 million last year. That total marked a 6.3 percent increase over the previous year, primarily driven by $16.1 million in stock awards, alongside a $1.4 million salary and $2.3 million in bonuses and incentives. The company has faced mounting pressure following its decision to walk back significant diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) commitments, especially its highly publicized $2 billion pledge in 2021 to support Black-owned businesses, improve the Black consumer experience, and invest in its Black workforce. The backlash has only intensified since February 1, when Rev. Jamal Bryant and a coalition of grassroots organizations announced a national boycott against the retail giant. That same day marked the beginning of Black History Month and the launch of a public education and selective buying campaign spearheaded by the Black Press of America. The movement has gained momentum nationwide, especially in the Twin Cities, just miles from where George Floyd was murdered in 2020. “This movement started here, in the Twin Cities,” said civil rights attorney Nekima Levy Armstrong during an appearance on the Black Press of America’s Let It Be Known news show. “We launched the boycott after Target rolled back its DEI programs, just days after Donald Trump returned to power and began his renewed assault on diversity.”Levy Armstrong said Target’s decision to bypass local activists in favor of meeting with Rev. Al Sharpton, who has openly acknowledged that he wasn’t involved in the boycott, further insulted them. “They said it with their chest, and now they want to quietly walk it back? Not on our watch,” Levy Armstrong declared. “Instead of engaging with the organizers who live and work three miles from George Floyd Square, Target reached out to someone who admitted he wasn’t even participating.” Target’s executive vice president and chief community and stakeholder engagement officer, Kiera Fernandez, reportedly took part in meetings about the boycott, but multiple requests for comment and engagement from the Black Press of America and community leaders have gone unanswered. “They made a Hail Mary pass,” said Monique Cullars-Doty, co-founder of Black Lives Matter Minnesota. “They were hoping Sharpton would catch it and run it into the end zone for them. But we’re the ones who’ve been doing the work, and they know it. That’s why this

boycott was always meant to be indefinite—not

40 days, not a fast, but until Target makes good on its promises and accounts for its role in fueling systemic harm.”Meanwhile, Target’s financial woes have worsened. Wall Street analysts have noted that the company’s stock price has dropped 22.2 percent in the past month, hitting a 52-week low. Despite those challenges, Target has remained quiet on its political contributions, including a $1 million donation to Donald Trump’s re-election campaign last year—the first time the company had ever given to a presidential candidate. This week, Cornell reportedly warned Trump that his tariff and trade policies could disrupt supply chains, raise prices, and create shortages across store shelves. Yet Cornell also praised his company’s performance in Target’s most recent annual report. “We entered 2024 with a commitment to stay nimble and generate profitable growth, and even in a challenging retail environment, our team delivered,” Cornell told employees. “By controlling what we can control, listening closely to consumers, and staying focused on what differentiates Target.” Jaylani Hussein, executive director of CAIR-Minnesota, said the company’s response proves otherwise. “We’ve been ignored,” Hussein said. “They’re still playing politics while losing Black consumers every day.”

2 Women Shot on Campus of Small Technical College Near LA

INGLEWOOD, Calif. (AP) — Two female employees of a Southern California technical college were shot on campus Friday and taken to the hospital in an incident that authorities attributed to workplace violence.

The shooting occurred around 4 p.m. in an office at the Spartan College of Aeronautics and Technology campus in Inglewood, where Mayor James Butts said the suspect was believed to be a former employee.

Aerial TV video showed a heavy police presence outside the campus in the city, which abuts Los Angeles to the southwest. One of the victims was in critical condition, Butts said. The Los Angeles County Fire Department confirmed on the social platform X that two people were taken to the hospital. A person was taken into custody after initially leaving the scene, Butts said.

The Los Angeles Police Department said officers detained a male subject from a car matching the description of a vehicle linked to the shooting, which had

the campus is patrolled regularly and, as an aviation school, safety is one of its primary focuses.

“It’s a peaceful campus,” Becker said. “It’s a nice community of students and teachers and staff.”

The Spartan College of Aeronautics and Technology has campuses across the country. The college's Inglewood location, about a mile (about 1.5 kilometers) from the Los Angeles International Airport, accommodates 500 students and offers training programs focused on aviation maintenance technology, according to its website.

CA Proposes Allowing Testing of Self-Driving Heavy-Duty Trucks

LOS ANGELES (AP) — California regulators have released a new proposal to allow the testing of self-driving heavy duty trucks on public roads.

The state’s Department of Motor Vehicles announced proposed regulations Friday to allow the testing of self-driving vehicles over 10,001 pounds, opening the door for companies to test self-driving technology with previously prohibited autonomous commercial semi-trucks on the road.

Regulators say self-driving heavy-duty trucks are already being tested in other states including Texas, Arizona and Arkansas. California is the only state with regulations that explicitly ban them.

The regulations are subject to a public comment period that ends in June.

They will likely face pushback from the labor unions that represent the state’s hundreds of thousands of commercial truck drivers, who are concerned about safety and losing truck driving jobs to automation in the future.

The California Legislature passed a bill in 2023 to require human drivers aboard selfdriving trucks, but it was vetoed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, who said additional regulation was unnecessarily because existing laws governing self-driving vehicles were sufficient.

The proposed regulations will also enhance data-reporting requirements for manufacturers, such as reporting instances when cars stop in the middle of an active road for any reason and need to be retrieved. They will give the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles more authority to apply “incremental enforcement measures” against companies instead of fully suspending their testing permits.

(Photo/Dr. Patrise Holden)
(Photo/Dr. Patrise Holden)
By Dr. Patrise Holden Washington Informer Special to Black Press USA Black and Hispanic street vendors, positioned along the street in front of Target, expressed worry that decreased foot traffic from sustained boycotting will affect their ability to make a living, and possibly put them out of business. (Photo/Dr. Patrise Holden) Signs in hand, on April 19th, a small crowd

100 Days of Chaos: Trump’s Return

Feels Like a Sequel No One Asked For

Donald Trump’s return to the White House has triggered a surge in consumer prices, widespread protests, and mounting legal and political concerns—all within his first 100 days.

A new analysis from Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) reveals that Trump’s sweeping tariffs on foreign goods have already added $14 billion in costs for U.S. households. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, import taxes soared to $96.3 billion in the first quarter of 2025, up 17 percent from the same period last year. ATF called the tariffs a regressive tax scheme that burdens working—and middle-class families while shielding the wealthy. “These are just the first effects of Trump’s reckless and regressive tariffs—the beginning of higher costs that families will face due to the president’s incompetent trade policies and to fund his tax giveaway to billionaires,” David Kass, ATF’s

executive director, said. ATF’s analysis found that the bottom 60 percent of households, which receive about one-fifth of the nation’s income, will shoulder nearly one-third of the tariff burden. Meanwhile, the top 1 percent of income earners—those making

more than $940,000—will pay just one-tenth of the cost despite taking in more than one-fifth of

national income.

The Yale Budget Lab projects that Trump’s tariff policy will result in an 18 percent effective tax rate on imported goods by the end of 2025—the highest since 1934. Without changes in consumer behavior, the rate could rise to 28 percent, the highest since 1901. More than 200 demonstrators shut down traffic across Washington on Tuesday to protest what organizers called “100 days of disaster.”

The protests resulted in eight arrests and widespread disruption throughout the city’s morning commute.

“For 100 days, Trump, Musk, and their billionaire friends have stripped away our fundamental freedoms—abducting our neighbors, cracking down on political dissidents, and attempting to erase trans people from existence,” Ella Weber, an organizer, said. Olivia DiNucci of CODEPINK said the administration has “gutted social services, sent billions to Israel, and boosted a trillion-dollar Pentagon budget, while families struggle to survive.”

Rev. Al Sharpton said Trump’s first 100 days “are Project 2025 in motion.” He pointed to executive orders targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion, eliminating police accountability efforts, and attacking LGBTQ+ rights. “Trump may have executive orders. He may have the House and the Senate. He may have a conservative Supreme Court that will stand idly by even when he defies their orders. But he does not control our dollars. He cannot stop us from marching,” Sharpton asserted. The Not Above the Law coalition accused the administration of ignoring court rulings, targeting political opponents through the Justice Department, and rewarding allies with sweeping pardons and federal contracts. “We have come too far, heard too many commitments, and proved our case for success to go back now,” Sharpton said.

Covered California Pushes for Better Health Care as Federal Spending Cuts Loom

By Bernard J. WolfsonFaced with potential federal spending cuts that threaten health coverage and falling childhood vaccination rates, Monica Soni, the chief medical officer of Covered California, has a lot on her plate — and on her mind.California’s Affordable Care Act health insurance exchange covers nearly 2 million residents and 89% of them receive federal subsidies that reduce their premiums. Many middle-income households got subsidies for the first time after Congress expanded them in 2021, which helped generate a boom in enrollment in ACA exchanges nationwide.From the original and enhanced subsidies, Covered California enrollees currently get $563 a month on average, lowering the average monthly out-of-pocket premium from $698 to $135, according to data from Covered California.The 2021 subsidies are set to expire at the end of this year unless Congress renews them. If they lapse, enrollees would be on the hook to pay an average of $101 a month more for health insurance — not counting any premium hikes in 2026 and beyond. And those middle-income earners who did not qualify for subsidies before would lose all financial assistance — $384 a month, on average — which Soni fears could prompt them to drop out. At the same time, vaccination rates for children 2 and under declined among 7 of the 10 Covered California health plans subject to its new qualityof-care requirements. Soni, a Los Angeles native who came to Covered California in May 2023, oversees that program, in which health plans must meet performance targets on blood pressure control, diabetes management, colorectal cancer screening, and childhood vaccinations — or pay a financial penalty.Lack of access to such key aspects of care disproportionately affects underserved communities, making Covered California’s effort one of health equity as well. Soni, a Harvard-trained primary care doctor who sees patients one day a week at an urgent care clinic in Los Angeles County’s public safety net health system, is familiar with the challenges those communities face.Covered California reported last

November that its health plans improved on three of the four measures in the first year of the program. But childhood immunizations for those under 2 declined by 4%. The decline is in line with a national trend, which Soni attributed to postpandemic mistrust of vaccines and “more skepticism of the entire medical industry.”Most parents have heard at least one untrue statement about measles or the vaccine for it, and many don’t know what to believe, according to an April KFF poll.Health plans improved on the other three measures, but not enough to avoid penalties, which yielded $15 million. The exchange is using that money to fund another effort Soni manages, which helps 6,900 Covered California households buy groceries and contributes to over 250 savings accounts for children who get routine checkups and vaccines. Some of the penalty money will also be used to support primary care practices around California.In addition to her bifurcated professional duties, Soni is the mother of two young children, ages 4 and 7. KFF Health News senior correspondent Bernard J. Wolfson spoke with Soni about the impact of possible federal cuts and the exchange’s initiative to improve care for its enrollees. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.Q: Covered California has record enrollment of nearly 2 million, boosted by the expanded federal subsidies passed under the Biden administration, which end after this year. What if Congress does not renew them?A: Our estimates are that it will approach 400,000 Californians who would drop coverage immediately. We hear every day from our folks that they’re really living on the margins. Until they got some of those subsidies, they could not afford coverage.As a primary care doctor, I am the one to treat folks who show up with preventable cancers because they were too afraid to think about what their out-of-pocket costs would be. I don’t want to go back to those days.Q: Congress is considering billions in cuts to Medicaid. How would that affect Covered California and the state’s population more broadly, given that more than 1 in 3 Californians are on

Medi-Cal, the state’s version of Medicaid?A: Those are our neighbors, our friends. Those are the people working in the restaurants we eat at. Earlier cancer screenings, better chronic disease control, lower maternal mortality, more substance use disorder treatment: We know that Medicaid saves lives. We know it helps people live longer and better. As a physician, I would be hard-pressed to argue for rolling back anything that saves lives. It would be very distressing to watch that come to California.Q: Why did Covered California undertake the Quality Transformation Initiative?A: We were incredibly successful at covering nearly 2 million, but frankly we didn’t see improvements in quality, and we continue to see gaps for certain populations in terms of outcomes. So, I think the question became much more imperative: Are we getting our money’s worth out of this coverage? Are we making sure people are living longer and better, and if not, how do we up the ante to make sure they are?Q: There’s a penalty for not meeting the targets, but no bonuses for meeting them: You meet the goals or else, right?A: We don’t say it like that, but that is true. And we didn’t make it complicated. It’s only four measures. It’s things that as a primary care doctor I know are important, that I take care of when I see people in my practice. We said get to the 66th percentile on these four measures, and there’s no dollars that you have to pay. If you don’t, then we collect those funds.Q: And you use the penalty money to fund the grocery assistance and child savings accounts.A: That’s exactly right. We had this opportunity to think about what would we use these dollars for and how we actually make a difference in people’s lives. So, we cold-called hundreds of people, we sent surveys out to thousands of folks, and what we heard overwhelmingly was how expensive it is to live in California; that folks are making tradeoffs between food and transportation, between child care and food — just impossible decisions.Q: You will put up to $1,000 a child into those savings accounts, right?A: That’s right. It’s tied to doing those healthy behaviors, going to child well visits

and getting recommended vaccines. We looked at the literature, and once you get to even just $500 in an account, the likelihood of a kid going to a two- or four-year school increases significantly. It’s actually because they’re hopeful about their future, and it changes their path of upward mobility, which we know changes their health outcome.Q: Given the rise in vaccine skepticism, are you worried that the recent measles outbreak could grow?A: I am very concerned about it. I was actually reading some posts from a physician colleague who trained decades earlier and was talking about all the diseases that my generation of physicians have never seen. We don’t actually know how to diagnose and take care of a number of infectious diseases because they mostly have been eradicated or outbreaks have been really contained. So, I feel worried. I’ve been brushing off my old textbooks.

How Proposed Federal Medicaid Cuts Could Impact California

Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives are fighting over whether they should slash Medicaid funding (known as Medi-Cal in California) -- and by how much. The cuts are critical to achieving a $1.5 trillion federal budget reduction the GOP-led House already approved in a February resolution. If implemented, the cuts to Medicaid will be the largest drawdown in the program’s history. The budget resolution to slash at least $880 billion through 2034 in Medicaid, nutrition programs and health care programs, including some funding for nursing homes, was proposed to the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee in late February. Congress could vote on the measure as early as this week. Of the almost one in four Americans enrolled in the Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), which includes low-income households, senior citizens, pregnant women and people with disabilities, the measure could eliminate coverage for 15.9 million people, according to data compiled by the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning but non-partisan think tank based in Washington, D.C.

A California Health Care Foundation report states that $100 billion of Medi-Cal’s $160 billion budget comprises federal funds.

“House Republicans passed a budget proposal that would lead to the largest Medicaid cuts in history, taking healthcare away from tens of millions of Americans to fund tax breaks for billionaires like Elon. It has never been clearer that Donald Trump and his Republican Party do not care about the health and well-being of seniors, children, people with disabilities, and working families. However, Democrats do care,” said Congresswoman Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA-37), reacting to the Republican passage of the budget resolution.

Kamlager-Dove convened a roundtable discussion at Eisner Health in Los Angeles with patients and healthcare providers to address the local impacts of the proposed Medicaid cuts. Her district has the fourth highest Medicaid enrollment in the nation.

“Democrats are fighting to protect Medicaid because it helps everyone, including those in both red and blue districts. Defending and improving this vital program should never be a partisan issue -- it’s about preserving healthcare in our country,” Kamlager-Dove continued.

The Medi-Cal program insures 14.9 million people, more than one-third of the state’s population.

Nine Republicans are a part of California’s delegation to the United States Congress, representing 2.5 million Medi-Cal enrollees. All nine of them voted to approve the House GOP budget bill.

Approximately 72.1 million Americans are currently enrolled in Medicaid and 7.2 million in CHIP -- including over 13 million African Americans.

Opponents of the cuts predict that they would pose a number of problems -- not only for states, but also for the people covered by Medicaid and the hospitals and physicians that provide services.

Among plans under consideration to implement the cuts are initiating work requirements for adults without disabilities and young children and beginning continual monitoring of eligibility.

This would limit states’ abilities to tax providers for their share of Medicaid revenues and reduce the amount the federal government matches for state Medicaid expansion.

“California will continue to work collaboratively with our federal partners to ensure that families in our state are healthy, and our communities are vibrant places to live and work,” said Anthony Cava, media relations manager at the California Department of Health Care Services.

State Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones (R-Santee) blasted Newsom and his Democratic colleagues for approving the funding, which will benefit all state residents, even those without legal status.

“Meanwhile, healthcare access is plummeting. Wait times are growing. Democrats have made their choice: legal residents come second,” Jones wrote on X. “We must stop new enrollments of illegal immigrants and rein in this unsustainable program before it collapses entirely.”

The California Budget and Policy Center has recommended that “state policymakers should prioritize identifying new, sustainable sources of revenue to safeguard health care access for millions,” in a recent fact sheet they released on the subject. They also recommend that policymakers close tax loopholes that benefit corporations and the wealthy.

On April 15, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation approving $2.8 billion to cover this year’s Medi-Cal funding gap, after taking out a $3.44 billion loan to pay bills. It is unclear how much the state will set aside to help make up the difference if the proposed Medicaid cuts pass.

Jessica Walker, co-founder and director of operations of Be Mom Aware, who served on the California Task Force on Maternal Mental Health, shared her experiences with postpartum depression during the “Pain to Power” advocacy day at the State Capitol. CBM photo by Antonio Ray Harvey.
Sen. Lola Smallwood-Cuevas (D–Los Angeles) spoke at the Pain to Power event hosted by the California Coalition for Perinatal Mental Health and Justice. She is the author of SB 626, a survivor-led bill aimed at strengthening California’s response to the perinatal mental health crisis. CBM photo by Antonio Ray Harvey.
Parents, survivors, advocates, and clinicians from across the state gathered at the State Capitol for the Pain to Power advocacy day, hosted by the California Coalition for Perinatal Mental Health and Justice. CBM photo by Antonio Ray Harvey.
Monica Soni, a Harvard-trained physician, is chief medical officer of Covered California, the state’s Affordable Care Act health insurance marketplace. Soni oversees an effort to hold Covered California’s health plans accountable for the care they provide. (Rich Pedroncelli for KFF Health News)

California Capitol News You Might Have Missed Political Playback

Statement on Trump’s First 100 Days

and fiscal challenges. The Trump administration has slashed higher education funding, launched investigations into UC’s admissions and diversity practices, and accused campuses of fostering antisemitism. In response, UC has lost $300 million in federal research grants and enacted a systemwide hiring freeze.

Addressing the UC Regents at a public meeting in San Francisco, Milliken emphasized the urgency of confronting these external threats while continuing to expand access and innovation. “These are unprecedented times in higher education,” he said. “We need to right the ship and move forward with strength and clarity.”

U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) issued a strong condemnation of President Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office, calling them “the worst first 100 days of any president in modern history.” Padilla highlighted several areas of concern, including the administration’s impact on federal programs, the economy, and immigrant communities.

In a statement released on April 29, Padilla accused Trump of undermining vital federal services that millions of Americans depend on.

“Trump has devastated federal programs and services that families in California and across the country rely on,” he said. Padilla added that the president’s trade policies have raised prices for Americans while failing to deliver on promises of economic relief.

“Trump promised to lower costs, but since taking office, his policies have driven prices up on everything from food to utilities to prescription drugs,” he said.

Padilla also criticized Trump’s budget proposals, which he called a “cruel Billionaire-first Budget” that would increase costs for working families while benefiting the wealthy. The senator reinforced that cuts to federal programs have real consequences further warning that critical services like healthcare, Social Security, and veterans’ benefits are at risk.

The senator’s remarks underscored the growing frustration among California’s Democratic leadership over Trump’s policies, which Padilla says are contributing to “costs, chaos, and corruption.”

He further stressed the negative impact on Californians, stating, “Our economy, consumer confidence, and the livelihoods of the American people are down -- that’s the legacy of Donald Trump’s first 100 days.” Padilla vowed to continue fighting for California communities, pledging to oppose what he described as Trump’s attacks on the economy, environment, and core values.

Gov. Newsom

Congratulates New U.C. President; Thanks Outgoing Leader for Vision, Contribution

The University of California has named James B. Milliken, current chancellor of the University of Texas system, as its next president. The UC Board of Regents announced the appointment May 2, selecting Milliken after a six-month national search to succeed Michael V. Drake, who will step down on July 31.

Milliken, 68, will lead the nation’s top public university system, a $53 billion enterprise with 10 campuses, six academic health centers, and three national laboratories, at a time of mounting political

California Gov. Gavin Newsom welcomed the appointment of Milliken as UC President, highlighting the importance of his leadership in shaping the university’s future.

“Chancellor Milliken brings years of experience and the steady, strategic leadership needed to expand UC’s impact across the state,” said Newsom.

“I am excited to see him drive the next chapter of innovation, talent, and progress that will shape California and the country for generations to come.”

The governor also expressed gratitude to outgoing President Michael V. Drake for his leadership and dedication to California’s students.

“I also want to thank Dr. Michael Drake for his leadership and vision during his tenure. He is a strong partner and his intellect, experience and commitment to our students has helped grow the next generation of California leaders. We wish him well in his retirement,” said Newsom.

A veteran of public university leadership, Milliken previously served as president of the University of Nebraska and chancellor of the City University of New York. At Texas, he led efforts to broaden access for low-income students, launch mental health initiatives, and implement major changes following GOP-led bans on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.

Milliken is expected to bring steady leadership and a collaborative approach as UC navigates federal investigations, state budget cuts, and growing campus unrest. Regents praised his deep experience and political acumen.

“He understands the transformative power of a public university system,” said Regent Chair Janet Reilly.

Milliken will begin his term in August, relocating from Austin to the Bay Area to take the helm of California’s flagship university system.

California Expands AI Use to Boost Public Safety, Customer Service, and Gov’t Efficiency

Gov. Gavin Newsom on April 29 announced a new wave of artificial intelligence initiatives aimed at improving public safety, enhancing customer service, and streamlining state operations. The state has entered into three new partnerships to apply generative AI (GenAI) technologies in traffic management, highway safety, and taxpayer assistance.

“California is demonstrating that GenAI can help us improve the way we do business for Californians,” said Trista Gonzalez, director of the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA), which will use AI to assist call center agents during peak seasons.

The initiatives include using Microsoft’s Azure OpenAI platform to help Caltrans reduce highway congestion, deploying Google Gemini AI via Deloitte to identify traffic safety improvements, and incorporating Anthropic’s Claude to improve CDTFA’s response times to taxpayer inquiries.

“We’re DOGE but better,” Newsom said, stressing that California’s approach is about strengthening public services, not cutting them. Newsom emphasized that the projects are being implemented in coordination with state employees and unions, contrasting the state’s approach with federal cost-cutting measures under Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency. “The announcement we’re making today was done in partnership with state workers and employees. That’s the difference,” Newsom said in Los Angeles.

The announcement builds on Newsom’s 2023 executive order directing state agencies to adopt GenAI to deliver faster, more responsive services. It comes as California faces off with the federal government over proposed cuts to AmeriCorps and tariffs, further asserting its role in shaping national policy through innovation and legal challenges.

Additional initiatives, including the Engaged California digital platform and a new productivityfocused AI pilot program, underscore the state’s broader push to modernize how it serves residents.

California’s Elections Chief and AG Bonta Oppose Federal Voter ID Push

California Secretary of State Shirley Weber and Attorney General Rob Bonta are pushing back against a federal bill backed by President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans that would impose voter ID requirements nationwide, arguing it threatens decades of progress in expanding voter access.

The U.S. House passed the proposed legislation, known as the SAVE Act, in April. It would require all voters to register in person with proof of citizenship, effectively undermining California’s voter-friendly laws such as same-day registration and automatic enrollment through the DMV. Trump previously suggested tying wildfire aid to California’s adoption of voter ID and signed an executive order on the issue, which has been blocked by a federal judge.

Weber criticized the bill as a “step backward,” saying it would disproportionately impact voters without easy access to documents like passports or birth certificates. Drawing from her personal history, she noted that her parents, former sharecroppers, were unable to vote in the Jim Crow South because of discriminatory barriers.

“Access to voting is essential in a democracy,” said Weber. “We are prepared in California to fight for democracy.”

Weber and Bonta are also challenging a voter ID law passed in Huntington Beach, arguing it violates state law. While an Orange County judge dismissed the state’s lawsuit, an appeal is underway. Democrats in the California Legislature recently blocked a state-level voter ID proposal, while Weber emphasized that California already has multiple safeguards ensuring only eligible voters can register.

“We don’t have any information that says we have voter fraud,” she said.

If the SAVE Act passes the Senate and is signed into law, it could reshape voting rights across the U.S., a prospect that California’s top officials say they are determined to resist.

California Rent Cap Bill Pulled Amid Housing Development Concerns

A bill aimed at strengthening rent control across California has been withdrawn for the year amid mounting opposition from real estate and landlord groups, though backers vow to revive the effort next legislative session.

Assemblymember Ash Kalra (D–San José)

announced Tuesday that his Affordable Rent Act, AB 1157, which proposed reducing the state’s rent cap from 10% to 5% for most multifamily properties over 15 years old, would be delayed and reintroduced in 2026. The bill also sought to expand eviction protections and extend safeguards to renters in single-family homes.

“As we enter an economic downturn and vulnerable Californians face dire financial situations, we must guide our policies with empathy,” said Kalra. “Housing is a human right.” The legislation passed the Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee by a slim margin but faced hesitation in the Judiciary Committee, where lawmakers cited concerns over unintended impacts on housing development. Industry opponents, including the California Apartment Association, argued the bill would discourage construction and strain small landlords.

Tenant advocates expressed disappointment. “We are going to come back every single year until there is a resolution,” said Shanti Singh of Tenants Together, citing the urgency of rising rents. “At the current cap, a tenant’s rent could double in just seven years.”

The 2019 Tenant Protection Act, which Kalra’s bill aimed to strengthen, will sunset in 2030. With rents continuing to climb and housing affordability ranked among voters’ top concerns, both sides expect continued battles ahead.

State Is Empowering Older Californians Through Conversation and Resources

May is Older Californians Month, a time to celebrate the resilience, strength, and wisdom of older adults while encouraging important conversations about aging, according to the California Department of Aging (CDA). This year’s theme is Flip the Script on Aging.

CDA urges families to start open discussions about the support that older adults need to thrive. This month highlights the need for early conversations, focusing on independence, dignity, and the wealth of knowledge older Californians contribute to their communities.

CDA Director Susan DeMarois emphasizes that initiating these conversations is a sign of strength. “Older adults are vibrant, capable, contributing members of our communities. Let’s celebrate the possibilities that come with every new chapter of life,” she said.

California Health and Human Services Agency (CalHHS) Secretary Kim Johnson notes that the best way to ensure independence as we age is through early conversations.

“Starting the conversation early is the best way to ensure independence and dignity as we age. It’s about empowering people with information and resources and helping them to thrive,” she said. These discussions are key to connecting older adults with valuable resources and information, empowering them to live with dignity.

As the state prepares for a significant demographic shift, by 2030, older adults will outnumber children under 18 for the first time. California’s groundbreaking Master Plan for Aging provides a strategic framework to support the growing senior population.

To help foster these intergenerational conversations, the CDA offers the Aging Resource Guide. The guide provides practical information on a range of topics, including fraud prevention, nutrition, caregiver support, disaster preparedness, and more. Californians can access the aging resource guide on the CDA’s website.

These Four Black Caucus Bills Clash With Key Aspects of Trump Admin Agenda

California Black Media

Over the last four weeks, California Black Media (CBM) has been examining the 16 bills included in the California Legislative Black Caucus (CLBC) “Road to Repair 2025 Priority Bill Package.” This week’s article looks at the last four bills in the series.

Each piece of legislation, authored by different members of the CLBC, is written as part of a broader umbrella package designed to repair “the generational harms caused by the cruel treatment of African American slaves in the United States.” However, the bills each include provisions that

stand in stark contrast to key aspects of the Trump administration policies which call for eliminating DEI in government and ethnic studies in schools as well as weakening criminal justice protections and pushing back against programs that level the playing field for descendants of enslaved people in the United States. Here is an overview of the four bills, a summary of what each one proposes and insights from each author.

Assembly Bill 766

Assembly Bill (AB) 766, introduced by Assemblymember LaShae Sharp-Collins (D-San Diego), seeks to require all executive branch agencies to conduct periodic racial equity analyses

and develop programs to further advance racial equity.

“DEIA programs across the country are under attack,” said Sharp-Collins. “These critical programs expand opportunities but also ensure equity and access. AB 766 protects those programs in California and commits the state to ensuring fairness by requiring a racial equity review in all departmental rulemaking.”

The bill would require all agencies and departments subject to the Governor’s authority to undertake a racial equity analysis before implementing any budget or before any regulation takes effect. The bill would require the racial equity analysis to be undertaken by an appointed DEI officer.

On April 30, the Assembly Committee on Appropriations voted 15-5 to approve the bill but re-referred it for further examination by the committee members.

Assembly Bill 475 AB 475, introduced by Assemblymember Lori Wilson (D-Suisun City), seeks to require the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to develop voluntary work programs for inmates.

Provisions in the bill align with Wilson’s mission to advocate for incarcerated individuals’ rights when it comes to forced labor.

“This bill would no longer require CDCR to require each able-bodied inmate to work and, instead, would require CDCR to develop a voluntary work program and to prescribe rules and regulations regarding voluntary work assignments for CDCR inmates,” wrote Wilson in the bill text. “Including the wages for work assignments and requiring wages for work assignments in county and city jail programs to be set.”

Last month, the Assembly Appropriations Committee voted 6-1 in favor of the bill before referring it to the suspense file.

SB 510

SB 510, introduced by Sen. Laura Richardson (D-Inglewood), seeks to require complete and

accurate K-12 curriculum regarding racial disparities, including impacts of segregation, slavery and systemic discrimination.

“SB 510, if passed, would ensure that California K-12 students have accurate teachings that reflect historical facts related to the treatment, struggles, and accomplishments of African Americans throughout our state’s history,” said Richardson.

The bill is similar to AB 1821, introduced by Assemblymember Ramos in 2024 that stated, “any instruction on the Spanish missions in California or the Gold Rush Era must also include instruction regarding the treatment of Native Americans during those periods.”

The Senate Appropriations Committee is currently reviewing the legislation.

AB 742 AB 742, introduced by Assemblymember Sade Elhawary (D-Los Angeles), seeks to designate descendants of American chattel slavery for priority when issuing professional licenses.

The bill is connected to SB 518, introduced by Senator Akilah Weber-Pierson, which establishes the Bureau for Descendants of American Slavery. The Bureau would be a state agency to verify lineage and facilitate access to reparations programs.

Once an individual’s lineage is established by the bureau, AB 742 would make the information a priority when issuing professional licenses, creating pathways towards economic opportunities. The bill’s introduction builds on the two main pillars of her political platform: restorative justice, and wellness equity.

“Change takes courage and community,” said Elhawary in a release. “And I intend to get right to work bringing people together and helping Californians keep a roof over their heads and food on the table, get their kids a good education, find family-sustaining jobs, become healthier, and live in safer neighborhoods.” On April 29, the Assembly Judiciary Committee voted 8-2 to advance the bill. It is currently under review in the Assembly Appropriations

Asm. Dr. LaShae-Sharp Collins (D-San Diego). Photos by Antonio Ray Harvey

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.