Page 72

Journal for Effective Schools

Volume 11, Number 1

Table 8. HLM Coefficient Estimates for Models 6 Predicting Commitment to Teaching from Measures of Teacher Efficacy, Measures of Principal Efficacy, and Reward Variables Predictors Coefficient Level 1 Intercept,

0

Level 2 intercept,

 00

Curriculum and standards influence (P1), Policy influence (P2),

0.10***

 01

0.03***

 02

Spending influence (P3),

0.00

 03

Cash bonus or additional resources for schoolwide activities (R1), Cash bonus or additional resources for teachers (R2), Non-monetary forms of recognition (R3), Administrative direction efficacy (T1) , Level 2 intercept,

 10

 02

 03

-0.04 0.29***

 12

Spending influence (P3),

 11

 13

Cash bonus or additional resources for schoolwide activities (R1), Cash bonus or additional resources for teachers (R2), Non-monetary forms of recognition (R3), Collective efficacy (T2) , Level 2 intercept,

 13

 12

 11

2

 20

0.14***

Curriculum and standards influence (P1), Policy influence (P2),

 22

Spending influence (P3),

 21

 23

Cash bonus or additional resources for schoolwide activities (R1), Cash bonus or additional resources for teachers (R2), Non-monetary forms of recognition (R3), Classroom management efficacy (T3) , Level 2 intercept,

0.02 -0.19***

1

Curriculum and standards influence (P1), Policy influence (P2),

 01

-0.02

 23

 22

 21

3

 30

0.09***

Curriculum and standards influence (P1), Policy influence (P2),

 31

 32

Spending influence (P3),

 33

Cash bonus or additional resources for schoolwide activities (R1), Cash bonus or additional resources for teachers (R2), Non-monetary forms of recognition (R3),

 33

* p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001

62

 32

 31 0.09*

Journal for Effective Schools - Spring 2013  

Vol. 11, #1