CVLU 2012 Year in Review

Page 57

Crime Victim Law Update

January - December 2012

Jimenez v. Waller, No. 12-1884, 2012 WL 6644065 (7th Cir. Nov. 5, 2012) (slip opinion). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Access Information and Documents – Other.” United States v. Rizzolo, No. 11-10384, 2012 WL 1095221 (9th Cir. Apr. 3, 2012) (memorandum). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to be Heard.” United States v. Egan, No. 10 Cr. 191(JFK), 2012 WL 3839412 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 5, 2012) (slip copy). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to be Heard.” United States v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., --- F. Supp. 2d ---, Crim. Action No. C-06-563, 2012 WL 4068675 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 14, 2012) (slip copy). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to be Heard.” IX. CHILD VICTIMS United States v. Kearney, 672 F.3d 81 (1st Cir. 2012). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Restitution – Attorney Fees.” United States v. Burgess, 684 F.3d 445 (4th Cir. 2012). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Restitution – Causation.” United States v. DeLeon, 678 F.3d 317 (4th Cir. 2012). *For full case summary, see “Constitutional Issues Related to Victims’ Rights – Defendant’s Right to Confrontation.” In re Amy Unknown, 701 F.3d 749 (5th Cir. 2012) (en banc). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Restitution – Causation.” United States v. Kebodeaux, 687 F.3d 232 (5th Cir. 2012) (en banc). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Protection – Other.” Doe v. Boland, 698 F.3d 877 (6th Cir. 2012). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Restitution – Causation.” United States v. Aleo, 681 F.3d 290 (6th Cir. 2012). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to be Heard.”

57

Crime Victim Law Update

United States v. Evers, 669 F.3d 645 (6th Cir. 2012). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Restitution – Causation.” United States v. Laraneta, 700 F.3d 983 (7th Cir. 2012). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Restitution – Calculation Method.” In re Amy, 698 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2012). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Restitution – Causation.” Marsh v. County of San Diego, 680 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2012). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Privacy – Photographs and Audio/Video Recordings.” In re Sealed Case, 702 F.3d 59 (D.C. Cir. 2012). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Restitution – Causation.” United States v. Gatewood, No. CR. 11-08074-PCTJAT, 2012 WL 2286999 (D. Ariz. June 18, 2012) (slip copy). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Privacy – Identifying Information.” United States v. Veazie, No. 2:11-cr-00202-GZS, 2012 WL 1430540 (D. Me. Apr. 25, 2012) (slip copy). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Restitution – Causation.” United States v. Olivieri, No. 09-743 (WHW), 2012 WL 1118763 (D.N.J. Apr. 3, 2012) (slip copy). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Restitution – Causation.” United States v. Martin, No. 2:10-CR-95, 2012 WL 3597436 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 20, 2012) (slip copy). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Restitution – Causation.” United States v. Tallent, 872 F. Supp. 2d 679 (E.D. Tenn. 2012). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Restitution – Calculation Method.” People v. Spence, 151 Cal. Rptr. 3d 374 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012). *For full case summary, see “Specific Victims’ Rights – Right to Courtroom Accommodations – Support Person Presence – Trial.”

© 2013 National Crime Victim Law Institute

ncvli.org


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
CVLU 2012 Year in Review by National Crime Victim Law Institute - Issuu