Issuu on Google+

Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277 Filed: 10/18/13 1 of 4 PageID #: 3736

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION KMART CORPORATION, Plaintiff CIV. ACT. NO. 1:11-CV-103-GHD-DAS versus THE KROGER CO., et al. Defendants KMART’S RESPONSE TO KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF JOHN R. KREWSON Plaintiff, Kmart Corporation, submits this Response to Kansas City Southern Railway Company’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of John R. Krewson. This Court should deny KCSR’s motion because, under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmacies, Inc.1, Mr. Krewson’s expert testimony with respect to KCSR is relevant, reliable and helpful to the trier of fact and is therefore admissible. Kmart has alleged that KCSR “failed to maintain a railroad underpass in the vicinity of Store 4883 by leaving it cluttered with debris, which prevented water flow and displacement, thereby contributing to the flood damages incurred by Store 4883 on May 2, 2010.”2 Kmart’s engineering expert, Mr. Krewson, opined that an existing debris field in the underpass of KCSR’s railroad blocked the flow of water and contributed to the flood damage at Kmart’s store. Mr. Krewson’s opinion that the debris field existed at the time of the May 2, 2010 flood event is based on his observation that the debris was embedded in the underpass, which suggested a permanence of the

1

509 U.S. 579 (1993).

2

See Kmart’s Complaint, Doc. 1, ¶ 36.


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277 Filed: 10/18/13 2 of 4 PageID #: 3737

debris field. His expert opinion is also based on his conversation with Mr. Huwe, the City’s Floodplain Administration, regarding KCSR’s failure to maintain the underpass prior to the flood event. Moreover, Mr. Krewson’s opinion regarding the existing debris field was confirmed by a photograph dated May 2, 2010 of the KCSR railroad underwater that was shown to Mr. Krewson by KCSR’s counsel at his deposition. The photograph indicates there was no floating debris in the area, which suggests that the debris field was present at the time of the flood event. Mr. Krewson’s opinion that the obstructions in Elam Creek, including the debris field at the KCSR railroad underpass, contributed to the flooding is based on his expertise and basic hydrological principles. The fact that Mr. Krewson did not conduct modeling to quantify the impact of the debris field in the railroad underpass on the flooding at Kmart’s store does not render his opinion unreliable. Mr. Krewson’s conclusion that there was an impact of the railroad underpass on the flooding is based on his experience and understanding that obstructions downstream of the Kmart store impeded the flow of water during the storm, causing a backup of floodwater, which increased the depth of flooding at Kmart’s store. Mr. Krewson’s opinions are relevant, reliable, and would be helpful to the jury and are therefore admissible. Further, KCSR’s motion should be denied as it seeks to exclude entirely Mr. Krewson’s testimony regarding KCSR. Mr. Krewson should be permitted to rebut the testimony of KCSR’s expert, Kelly Blake Mendrop, that a 25% debris blockage at the railroad would not have contributed to the flooding at Kmart’s store. Mr. Mendrop’s opinion is based on modeling that relied on outdated, insufficient and unreliable data and should be excluded. Mr. Krewson should be afforded the opportunity to address Mr. Mendrop’s faulty opinion.

2


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277 Filed: 10/18/13 3 of 4 PageID #: 3738

In support of its Motion, Kmart submits the following: •

Exhibit “A” - Initial Flooding Evaluation of John R. Krewson, dated September 20, 2012;

Exhibit “B” - Photograph, Bates labeled Corinth00106;

Exhibit “C” - First Amended Flooding Evaluation of John R. Krewson, dated July 23, 2013;

Exhibit “D” - Excerpts of Deposition of John R. Krewson, dated May 22, 2013;

Exhibit “E” - Excerpts of Deposition of David Huwe, dated August 26, 2013; and

Exhibit “F” - June 2013 Report of Mendrop Engineering Resources.

Accordingly, Kmart respectfully requests that this Court deny KCSR’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of John R. Krewson. This the 18th day of October 18, 2013.

/s/ Ryan O. Luminais ____________________________________ JAMES M. GARNER (La. Bar. No. 19589) JOHN T. BALHOFF, II (La. Bar. No. 24288) RYAN O. LUMINAIS (Miss. Bar. No. 101871) SHER GARNER CAHILL RICHTER KLEIN & HILBERT, L.L.C. 909 Poydras Street, Twenty-eighth Floor New Orleans, Louisiana 70112 Telephone: (504) 299-2100 Facsimile: (504) 299-2300 ATTORNEYS FOR KMART CORPORATION

3


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277 Filed: 10/18/13 4 of 4 PageID #: 3739

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the above and foregoing has been served on all known counsel of record with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will automatically send-email notification to all known counsel of record, this 18th day of October, 2013. /s/ Ryan O. Luminais _________________________________________ RYAN O. LUMINAIS

4


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 1 of 23 PageID #: 3740

EXHIBIT

A


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 2 of 23 PageID #: 3741


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 3 of 23 PageID #: 3742


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 4 of 23 PageID #: 3743


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 5 of 23 PageID #: 3744


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 6 of 23 PageID #: 3745


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 7 of 23 PageID #: 3746


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 8 of 23 PageID #: 3747


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 9 of 23 PageID #: 3748


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 10 of 23 PageID #: 3749


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 11 of 23 PageID #: 3750


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 12 of 23 PageID #: 3751


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 13 of 23 PageID #: 3752


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 14 of 23 PageID #: 3753


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 15 of 23 PageID #: 3754


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 16 of 23 PageID #: 3755


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 17 of 23 PageID #: 3756


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 18 of 23 PageID #: 3757


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 19 of 23 PageID #: 3758


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 20 of 23 PageID #: 3759


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 21 of 23 PageID #: 3760


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 22 of 23 PageID #: 3761


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-1 Filed: 10/18/13 23 of 23 PageID #: 3762


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-2 Filed: 10/18/13 1 of 1 PageID #: 3763

EXHIBIT

B


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 1 of 25 PageID #: 3764

Amended Flooding Evaluation

Kmart # 4883 118 Highway 72 West Corinth, Mississippi 38834

Prepared For:

0112

Mr. John T. Balhoff, II Sher Garner Cahill Richter Klein & Hilbert, L.L.C. 909 Poydras Street, Twenty-eighth Floor New Orleans, Louisiana 70112

EFI Global Job No: 98340-08794

July 23, 2013

Prepared By: EFI Global, Inc. 3039 Premiere Parkway Suite 700 Duluth, GA 30097

EXHIBIT

C


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 2 of 25 PageID #: 3765

3039 Premiere Parkway Suite 700 Duluth, GA 30097 Tel: 770-925-9600 Tel: 800-245-9601 Fax: 770-925-9649 www.efiglobal.com

July 23, 2013 Mr. John T. Balhoff, II Sher Garner Cahill Richter Klein & Hilbert, L.L.C. 909 Poydras Street, Twenty-eighth Floor New Orleans, Louisiana 70112

Re:

Amended Flooding Evaluation Kmart # 4883 118 Highway 72 West Corinth, Mississippi 38834 EFI Global JN: 98340-08794

Dear Mr. Balhoff: Please find our amended report related to the flooding of Kmart store # 4883 at 118 Highway 72 West, in Corinth, Mississippi. This report re-calculates the HEC-RAS results shown in the original report of September 20, 2012. The HEC-RAS results used in the September 20, 2012 report were based on an inadvertent flow data discrepancy in the HEC-RAS model. The revised HEC-RAS model herein is expanded to review additional flooding scenarios at the site. This amendment also discusses and utilizes information concerning the Kmart Store # 4883 site that was not available for review at the time the September 20, 2012 report was submitted. The additional information includes the original construction plans for the site, debris at the railroad bridge, and the LOMR, LOMA, and Elevation Certificates approved at the site. For the purposes of this report, the front of Kmart store # 4883, hereinafter also referred to as Kmart, will be the side of the store facing the intersection of Highway 72 West and South Fulton Drive. Directions right and left will be based on a viewer facing Kmart from this intersection. Using this convention, the right side of the store faces South Fulton Drive, the left side of the store faces Highway 72 West, and the rear of the store faces State Street.


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 3 of 25 PageID #: 3766

Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

Background: The Kmart store is a large retail store located in a shopping center at the corner of Highway 72 West and South Fulton Drive in Corinth, Mississippi (Figure 1). The building housing the Kmart store has slab on grade, open plan, warehouse type construction with at-grade parking abutting the store on the front. Paved driveways are on the left side and rear of the store. The building housing Kmart also houses a Kroger Grocery store as a continuation of the building to the right of the Kmart. Both the Kmart and the Kroger stores were constructed in 1992 as a part of the overall development of the retail center. The two stores have the same floor elevation and share parking. The overall Kmart-Kroger retail center is a 16.29 acre tract located in a low area adjacent to Elam Creek, a large creek to the right of South Fulton Drive flowing north to south towards Highway 72 West. Parking for the Kmart and Kroger stores is at grade. Storm water runoff from the parking lot in front of the stores is collected in drop inlets and carried across South Fulton Drive in an underground pipe system to an existing detention facility located to the right of the site between South Fulton Drive and Elam Creek. Grades on the site are flat. Roof drainage for the Kmart and Kroger stores is provided by gutters and downspouts on the rear of the store buildings. The downspouts discharge onto splash blocks at grade with the asphalt pavements behind the stores. Runoff from pavement behind the stores drains away from the stores across the paving to the rear curb. The runoff is collected and discharged by several flumes through the curb into an existing ditch draining left to right parallel to the curb behind the buildings. Flow in the ditch is collected, along with runoff from the large grassed area behind the site, into a headwall for a 60 inch outfall storm drain. The 60 inch headwall is located approximately between the Kroger and the Kmart stores, behind the rear curb of the parking lot behind the stores. The 60 inch outfall pipe runs from the headwall back towards the building to a drop inlet in the pavement behind the Kroger store. From this inlet, the pipe runs to the right behind the Kroger store through a series of drop inlets and then across South Fulton Drive. The location of the outfall headwall for the 60 inch pipe once it crosses South Fulton Drive could not be determined. Based on the location of the existing buildings to the right of South Fulton Drive and an inspection of Elam Creek in the area, it is believed the pipe turns and runs parallel to South Fulton Drive toward Highway 72 West and eventually discharges into the existing detention facility noted above.


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 4 of 25 PageID #: 3767

Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

Flooding Event: According to weather records on WeatherWarehouse.com, rain began falling in the Corinth area during the late evening of May 1, and the early morning of May 2, 2010. By 5:00 a.m., the records for Corinth show that 5.68 inches of rain had fallen. As the morning progressed, water began rising rapidly around the Kmart. According to the store manager, Mr. Matt Hausmann, water was building up and flowing along the rear of the building, putting stress on the rear doors of the store. Eventually, landscape timbers stored on site struck the doors with enough force to break open the doors, lodge in the opening, and allow water to flood into the store. The quantity of water overwhelmed the staff’s ability to control it. According to Mr. Hausmann, the water in the parking lot around the building was measured at a depth of 22 inches by City of Corinth employees. Photographs taken in the Kmart store show a water depth of approximately 1.5 feet. Mr. Hausmann stated that there was a similar depth of water in both the Kmart and the Kroger store. The water caused considerable damage to the buildings and the inventory of the both the Kmart and Kroger stores. The flooding in 2010 is very similar to flooding events that occurred on October 13, 2001 and November 18, 2001 as outlined in a report prepared by the engineering firm of Reaves Sweeney Marcom of Memphis, Tenn. Weather Data: The records for the area found on WeatherWarehouse.com show a rainfall event occurring overnight and during the morning of May 2, 2010 for the northern Mississippi and western Tennessee areas. Although hourly records for the area were not available, a review of the daily recording times and the pattern of rainfall distribution on area weather stations show that between 6 and 13 inches of rainfall fell during the period prior to 8:00 a.m., with the higher rainfall events occurring north of Corinth with Corinth being approximately on the southern extent of the heavy rainfall. Weather stations 10 or more miles south of Corinth and the Kmart site show relatively light rainfall accumulation, with the amount of rainfall recorded increasing with distance north of Corinth. Because Elam Creek, the creek that flooded the site, heads up approximately 6 miles north of the site and flows south to the site, the pattern of increased rainfall amounts north of the site increased the flooding impact on the Kmart site. Based on NOAA Technical Paper 40 for the Corinth area, the 24 hour 100 year rainfall event is 7.6 inches. Based on the weather records, it appears that the storm of May 2, 2010 may have approached the 100 year rainfall amount.


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 5 of 25 PageID #: 3768

Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

FEMA Flooding Data: The current FEMA Firm Panel for the site, panel 28003C0067 (Figure 3), shows that the majority of the site area, including all of the Kmart and the Kroger building, is located in the designated flood limits of Elam Creek. Elam Creek is large tributary creek having an upstream drainage area of over 6 square miles draining to the site of the Kmart building. At the store site, the creek has a large, well developed flood zone designated on the FIRM panel as an AE zone. AE zones are studied zones having established base flood elevations. The Firm Panel also shows an area along both banks of the creek that is designated as the regulatory floodway for the creek. According to the FIRM panel, approximately one half of the Kroger store is located in both the floodplain and also in the area FEMA has designated as being the regulatory floodway. The Kmart store is located in the floodplain only. According to a Letter of Map Revision issued for the site in 2005, the 100 year flood elevation for the building is 432.4. An Elevation Certificate for the site prepared on November 11, 2001 places the finished floor elevation of the building at 433.0, 0.6 feet above the elevation of the FEMA 100 year flood elevation. Based on an as-built survey prepared for the site as a part of this report, the exterior grades along the perimeter of the building vary from 431.8 and 432.2, meaning the lowest adjacent grades around the building are below the flood elevation. A review of the FEMA historic FIRM records determined that the flood elevation of Elam Creek is unchanged on the current FIRM from the 100 year flood elevations at the time of construction of the building. Typically, standard design and permitting practice require building floor elevations in flood prone areas, especially in designated flood areas to be at least 3.0 feet above the 100 year flooding elevation. In the case of the Kmart and the Kroger, this would place the floor elevations at 435.4, 2.4 feet higher than the actual floor elevation. Had the building been constructed with a floor elevation of 435.4, flooding would not have occurred during the storm of 2010. The review of the elevation of the building relative to the flood elevation would typically have been the responsibility of the City of Corinth building authorities. The location of the Kroger in the floodway is a concern. As noted, approximately one half of the Kroger was built in the floodway for Elam Creek. A review of aerial photography and the current FIRM for the site shows that a number of other buildings were also built in the floodway. According to records I have examined, the floodway shown on current FIRM is unchanged from the floodway shown on the prior FIRM panel, prior to the construction of the building. FEMA’s 2009 Flood Insurance Study for Alcorn County and Incorporated Areas, states:


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 6 of 25 PageID #: 3769

Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

“Encroachment on floodplains, such as structures and fill, reduces the flood carrying capacity, increases the flood heights and velocities, and increases flood hazards in areas beyond the encroachment itself. One aspect of floodplain management involves balancing the economic gain from floodplain development against the resulting increase in flood hazard. For purposes of the NFIP, a floodway is used as a tool to assist local communities in this aspect of floodplain management. Under this concept, the area of the 1-percent-annual-chance floodplain is divided into a floodway and a floodway fringe. The floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 1percent-annual-chance flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights. Minimum Federal standards limit such increases to 1.0 foot, provided that hazardous velocities are not produced. The floodways in this study are presented to local agencies as minimum standards that can be adopted directly or can be used as a basis for additional floodway studies.” Simply put, floodwaters must have an open, unobstructed flowing pathway along a creek. If earth fill or buildings or other structures are built in the flow pathway floodwaters rise and move faster and cause greater damage. When FEMA prepares their maps, they calculate what a reasonable flow pathway should be and show it as the “Floodway” on their maps. It is the responsibility of the cities and counties that issue building permits to enforce the restriction and make sure that the floodway is not blocked. The difference between the areas on the FEMA maps called the “Floodway” and the areas called the “Floodplain” is that nothing can be built in the “Floodway”, while careful construction is allowed in the “Floodplain” areas. The Kmart store is built entirely in the “Floodplain.” Approximately one half of the Kroger store is built in the “Floodway”, obstructing the flow of floodwater down the creek. The construction of the Kroger and other structures in the known floodway of Elam Creek increases the flood heights and potential for flooding, as well as for increased velocities, both of the factors involved in the flooding of the Kmart store. It is not known what regularity review was in place at the time the Kroger and other buildings were constructed in the floodway, but as the above quote from the Flood Insurance Study states, it is the responsibility of the local governing authority to control and prevent construction in the floodway. According to the August 30, 2010 volume of the “Federal Register”, Corinth, Mississippi, and Alcorn County, Mississippi were among the jurisdictions subject to suspension of community eligibility under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) for non-compliance with the floodplain management requirements of the program. A review of the “Existing Conditions Plan” sheet C-2 dated 03/09/1992 from the original construction plans for the site prepared by Prime Engineering found the


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 7 of 25 PageID #: 3770

Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

elevation and location of the floodplain, and the location of the floodway to be substantially different from the floodplain and floodway shown on the FEMA FIRM panel for the area at the time. The floodway on the plans is shown south of Fulton Drive. The floodplain elevation on the plan sheet is approximately 430.8 which is 1.6 feet below the FEMA FIRM flood elevation shown on 1981 FIRM in force at the time. The derivation of the floodplain and floodway data shown on the plans is unknown. Although the Kroger and other structures along Elam Creek were constructed in the floodway without restriction, a review of FEMA’s records found that a “Letter of Map Revision” or LOMR was issued by FEMA in November 18, 2005, removing the Kroger property from the floodway due to “Inadvertent Inclusion in the Floodway 1”. The records do not indicate how the LOMR originated, or what studies, review or public notice was given prior to issuance. FEMA regulations require a flood study be done to determine the impact of the encroachment on flood elevations and velocities. The studies are submitted to FEMA for review and approval. No record was found of such a study. Issuance also requires that other affected property owners along the creek be notified, and public notice be made. No record of this was found. Once the studies and public notice are complete, the local governing and review agency responsible for flood management and oversight makes a final review of the LOMR and recommends approval. No record of this was found. Prior to the issuance of the FEMA’s Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) in 2005, other prior efforts had been made regarding the location of the buildings in the floodplain and floodway. Also in 2005, a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) was issued for the site. An Elevation Certificate was issued by FEMA in 2001. Note: The issuance of the LOMR, LOMA, and Elevation Certificate would have no impact on the physical presence of the buildings in the floodway or floodplain, or on the potential for flooding in any given flood event. These instruments would serve to reduce the cost of flood insurance for the buildings. The buildings are still shown in the floodplain and the floodway on the 2010 FEMA FIRM map for the site. Along with the placement of the Kroger and other structures in the regulatory floodway, several other conditions that would increase the flood elevations on the site were noted along the creek and in the floodplain at the time of the initial inspection: 

Southeast of the Kmart near Highway 72, at the point where Kansas Southern Railroad’s north-south railroad line crosses Elam Creek on a timber bridge, a considerable debris field was noted upstream of the bridge. The debris blocked approximately the lower quarter of the bridge opening. Mr. David Huwe, the Director of Community Development and Planning for the City of Corinth stated during an interview in his office that the railroad had a poor


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 8 of 25 PageID #: 3771

Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

record of maintenance and that the debris at the railroad bridge had been an ongoing problem for some time prior to the flood event. A picture of the flooded railroad bridge not available at the time of our initial report shows the bridge to be completely underwater. In the picture, there is no debris field floating upstream of the bridge. For the debris found behind the bridge at the time of our inspection to have resulted from debris floating downstream during the storm, there would have be a considerable amount of floating debris trapped behind the bridge when the water level dropped. The lack of a floating debris field in the picture indicates that the debris found behind the bridge after the flood were present prior to the flooding. Since they did not rise and float off during the flood, they apparently were present for a long enough time to become embedded behind the bridge. Pictures taken during our initial investigation (Figure19 thru 21) show a debris field upstream of the ridge on the floor of the creek. It was noted during the field survey done in August, 2010, approximately 3 months after the initial inspection, that the debris field had been removed. It is not known who cleaned up the debris. Pictures taken April 28, 2011 by others show another, larger debris field upstream of the bridge. 

A bridge for an abandoned railroad spur crossing Elam Creek remains in place with narrowly spaced abutments obstructing the creek channel.

The creek channel was badly overgrown with vegetation and poorly maintained. Near the spur railroad bridge noted above, utility and sanitary sewer pipes crossing the channel were apparently abandoned in place, obstructing the channel.

The approximately 4.5 acre grassed field immediately behind the Kmart and Kroger building was originally a number of feet lower in elevation. According to Mr. Huwe with the City of Corinth, the city filled the area over time with excess earth material from various projects around the city. Evidence that dumping of excess fill was still underway was found at the time of the initial inspection of the area (Figure 10). Filling the area reduced the flood storage and flood protection for the Kmart and Kroger building.

The report on the 2001 flooding by Reaves Sweeney Marcom noted above discussed the Elam Creek channel blockage, overgrown channel, and the railroad crossing and utility line impacts on the flooding.


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 9 of 25 PageID #: 3772

Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

HEC-RAS Flood Studies: To determine the impact of the Kroger encroachment and general conditions of the flood hazard at the time of the May 2, 2010 flood, we prepared a preliminary HECRAS evaluation for the site using as-built survey data and the flows for the area listed in FEMA’s 2009 Flood Insurance Study. As noted there was a discrepancy in this preliminary initial report. Conflicting flow data was used in preparing the model. This conflict resulted in a conclusion in the report that placement of the Kroger store in the floodway caused a rise in the flood of 1.0 feet. The original study also compared the overgrown existing Elam creek channel with a theoretical well maintained channel and concluded that there would be a 2.0 foot drop in the water surface if the creek channel were well maintained. For this amendment, the HEC-RAS flow data was revised and the flow data discrepancy was corrected. A new HEC-RAS model was prepared. In this new model three profiles were run. The initial profile was for the site assuming the Kmart and Kroger building were never built and the grades were at the surveyed elevation at the exterior of the building. This profile was used as a benchmark model. A second profile was run based on an unobstructed floodway with a channel having only light brush and weeds. This profile produced 100 year flood elevations on the site comparable with those shown in the 2009 Flood Insurance Study, and on the FEMA FIRM panel. The second profile was run with the Kroger building only, the Kmart building alone, and the combined Kmart- Kroger building. The model of the second profile with only the Kroger building determined that a rise of 1.10 feet occurred relative to the benchmark, slightly higher than the rise predicted by FEMA’s floodway calculation. The model of the Kmart building found a rise of 1.0 feet relative to the benchmark. The model of the Kmart-Kroger building also found a rise of 0.9 relative to the benchmark. Although the above calculations appear to indicate that the addition of the Kroger building to the Kmart building had no impact on the Kmart building, a review of the flow and velocity data from the model found that the addition of the Kroger to the Kmart building reduced the overbank width of flow at the building by 209 feet and increased the average velocity of flow at the building by 20 percent. Prior to the addition of the Kroger building the Kmart building was essentially outside the active overbank flow of water. When the Kroger building was added, the overbank flow overlapped the combined building by 114 feet, increasing the exposure of the building to flowing water. Rapidly flowing water carrying debris along the back of the Kmart building that damaged the rear door was reported as the cause of the water intruding into the Kmart building on the date of loss.


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 10 of 25 PageID #: 3773

Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

During the flooding of 2010, water levels above the FEMA 100 year flood level were reported in the building. To test the potential impact of the overgrown banks along Elam Creek channel, a third HEC-RAS profile was run based on channel properties for high flows and a poorly maintained channel found in the documentation for the HEC-RAS model. This model reported water levels at the building comparable to the water levels found at the building during the 2010 flood indicating water levels at the site could occur at the 100 year flow level. Given the impact of the other building obstructions located in the floodway and floodplain that are not included in the model, it appears that the actual flow at the site was likely less than the 100 year event. The results the high flow-poorly maintained condition was compared to the result from the second profile which assumed a moderately well maintained channel without obstruction. The comparison of the two models found that for the Kmart-Kroger building, the poorly maintained channel resulted in a 1.4 feet rise when compared to the depth at the site with a maintained channel. When the water level from the third profile was compared to the benchmark profile, the flow was 2.3 feet higher than the benchmark which is also in line with reported events. Conclusions: 1. The drainage basin upstream from the Kmart site received rainfall that appears to approximate the 1-percent-annual-chance rainfall event (100 year storm). Using the FEMA 1-percent-annual-chance (100 year) flow data, and using a model with an overgrown channel similar to that existing at the time of the flood, flooding in Elam Creek exceeds the FEMA 1-percent-annual-chance (100 year flood) elevation and approaches the actual depths of flooding at the building reported. The presence of the Kroger store as well as other buildings in the floodway increased the impact and depth of flooding during the flood event of May 2, 2010 and caused damage to Kmart. 2. The lack of maintenance of the creek channel, coupled with obstructions and debris in the channel increased the depth of flooding and caused increased damage to the Kmart during the flood event of May 2, 2010. 3. Filling in the low area behind the Kmart and Kroger stores reduced the flood storage volume and likely increased the depth of flooding damage to Kmart. 4. Despite the location of the building in a large and documented floodplain and floodway with a documented history of recent damaging past floods, no actions such as caulking and waterproofing the exterior walls, or construction of a protective membrane around the building were done to protect the building.


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 11 of 25 PageID #: 3774

Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

It is our belief that: had the creek channel been maintained, had building construction in FEMA’s regulatory floodway been restricted, had the area behind the Kroger and Kmart stores not been filled, and had the building been protected by waterproofing, the Kmart store would not have flooded, or had flooding occurred, it would have been occurred at such a depth that normal preventive actions by the store’s staff at the time of the event would have been able to protect the store from damage. Qualifications Our services have been performed using that degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised under similar conditions by reputable members of EFI Global’s profession. If any additional information is encountered which relates to this evaluation, EFI Global reserves the right to review our conclusions and opinions accordingly. In some cases, additional studies may be warranted to fully evaluate concerns noted. Any verbal statements made before, during, or after the course of the investigation were made as a courtesy only and are not considered a part of this report. Closing EFI Global, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to provide consulting services to you in this matter. Please contact us should any questions arise concerning this report, or if we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, EFI Global, Inc.

John R. Krewson Engineering Consultant


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 12 of 25 PageID #: 3775

Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

John R. Krewson, PE

FIGURE 1 - OVERALL SITE


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 13 of 25 PageID #: 3776

Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

FIGURE 2 – CLOSE AERIAL VIEW OF SITE


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 14 of 25 PageID #: 3777

Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

FIGURE 3 – FEMA FIRM PANEL OF THE SITE Panel No.2803C0067C Effective Date: Sept. 17, 2010


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 15 of 25 PageID #: 3778 Partridge Residence EFI No.: 98340-09777 April 25, 2011

FIGURE 4 FRONT VIEW OF KMART AND KROGER

FIGURE 5 LEFT SIDE OF THE KMART


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 16 of 25 PageID #: 3779 Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

FIGURE 6 VIEW ALONG THE FRONT OF KMART LOOKING FROM THE LEFT SIDE

FIGURE 7 VIEW ALONG THE REAR OF KMART LOOKING FROM THE LEFT SIDE


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 17 of 25 PageID #: 3780 Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

FIGURE 8 LEFT SIDE OF KMART LOOKING FROM THE REAR CORNER WITH TYPICAL DROP INLET IN FOREGROUND

FIGURE 9 TYPICAL DOWN DRAIN ON REAR OF BUILDING


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 18 of 25 PageID #: 3781 Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

FIGURE 10 CURB CUT IN REAR PARKING CURB NEAR LEFT SIDE OF KMART WITH DITCH BEYOND

FIGURE 11 FLUME THROUGH CURB BEHIND KMART


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 19 of 25 PageID #: 3782 Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

FIGURE 5 12 DITCH BEHIND KMART

FIGURE 13 GRASSED FIELD IN AREA THAT WAS FILLED IN BEHIND THE SITE WITH NEW FILL IN THE BACKGROUND


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 20 of 25 PageID #: 3783 Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

FIGURE 14 INLET TO 60 INCH PIPE COLLECTING WATER FROM THE DITCH BEHIND THE SITE

FIGURE 15 VIEW OF THE FIELD BEIND THE SITE NEAR THE RIGHT CORNER OF KROGER


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 21 of 25 PageID #: 3784 Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

FIGURE 16 PILE OF FILL MATERIAL IN THE FIELD BEHIND THE SITE WITH KMART AND KROGER IN THE BACKGROUND

FIGURE 17 RIGHT SIDE OF THE KROGER LOOKING BACK TOWARD HIGHWAY 72 WEST


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 22 of 25 PageID #: 3785 Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

FIGURE 18 FLOODING DEBRIS IN THE FENCE ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE ROAD RUNNING BESIDE KROGER

FIGURE 19 LOOKING UPSTREAM AT DEBRIS FIELD AT RAILROAD BRIDGE SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 23 of 25 PageID #: 3786 Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

FIGURE 20 LOOKING DOWNSTREAM AT DEBRIS FIELD AT RAILROAD BRIDGE

FIGURE 21 DEBRIS FIELD AT RAILROAD BRIDGE


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 24 of 25 PageID #: 3787 Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

FIGURE 5 22 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES OBSTRUCTING ELAM CREEK WITH SPUR RAILROAD BRIDGE OBSTRUCTION AND OVERGROWN CHANNEL

FIGURE 23 OVERGROWN AND UNMAINTAINED CREEK CHANNEL


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-3 Filed: 10/18/13 25 of 25 PageID #: 3788 Kmart # 4883 Amended EFI No.: 98340-08794 July 23, 2013

FIGURE 24 TREE AND OVERGROWN AND UNMAINTAINED CREEK CHANNEL AT BRIDGE

FIGURE 25 OVERGROWN SPUR RAILROAD BRIDGE WITH UTILITY OBSTRUCTIONS IN BACKGROUND


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-4 Filed: 10/18/13 1 of 6 PageID #: 3789

EXHIBIT

D


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-4 Filed: 10/18/13 2 of 6 PageID #: 3790


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-4 Filed: 10/18/13 3 of 6 PageID #: 3791


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-4 Filed: 10/18/13 4 of 6 PageID #: 3792


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-4 Filed: 10/18/13 5 of 6 PageID #: 3793


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-4 Filed: 10/18/13 6 of 6 PageID #: 3794


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-5 Filed: 10/18/13 1 of 8 PageID #: 3795

EXHIBIT

E


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-5 Filed: 10/18/13 2 of 8 PageID #: 3796


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-5 Filed: 10/18/13 3 of 8 PageID #: 3797


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-5 Filed: 10/18/13 4 of 8 PageID #: 3798


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-5 Filed: 10/18/13 5 of 8 PageID #: 3799


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-5 Filed: 10/18/13 6 of 8 PageID #: 3800


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-5 Filed: 10/18/13 7 of 8 PageID #: 3801


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-5 Filed: 10/18/13 8 of 8 PageID #: 3802


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 1 of 142 PageID #: 3803

EXHIBIT

F


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 2 of 142 PageID #: 3804


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 3 of 142 PageID #: 3805


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 4 of 142 PageID #: 3806


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 5 of 142 PageID #: 3807


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 6 of 142 PageID #: 3808


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 7 of 142 PageID #: 3809


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 8 of 142 PageID #: 3810


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 9 of 142 PageID #: 3811


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 10 of 142 PageID #: 3812


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 11 of 142 PageID #: 3813


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 12 of 142 PageID #: 3814


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 13 of 142 PageID #: 3815


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 14 of 142 PageID #: 3816


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 15 of 142 PageID #: 3817


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 16 of 142 PageID #: 3818


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 17 of 142 PageID #: 3819


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 18 of 142 PageID #: 3820


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 19 of 142 PageID #: 3821


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 20 of 142 PageID #: 3822


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 21 of 142 PageID #: 3823


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 22 of 142 PageID #: 3824


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 23 of 142 PageID #: 3825


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 24 of 142 PageID #: 3826


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 25 of 142 PageID #: 3827


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 26 of 142 PageID #: 3828


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 27 of 142 PageID #: 3829


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 28 of 142 PageID #: 3830


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 29 of 142 PageID #: 3831


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 30 of 142 PageID #: 3832


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 31 of 142 PageID #: 3833


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 32 of 142 PageID #: 3834


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 33 of 142 PageID #: 3835


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 34 of 142 PageID #: 3836


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 35 of 142 PageID #: 3837


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 36 of 142 PageID #: 3838


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 37 of 142 PageID #: 3839


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 38 of 142 PageID #: 3840


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 39 of 142 PageID #: 3841


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 40 of 142 PageID #: 3842


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 41 of 142 PageID #: 3843


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 42 of 142 PageID #: 3844


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 43 of 142 PageID #: 3845


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 44 of 142 PageID #: 3846


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 45 of 142 PageID #: 3847


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 46 of 142 PageID #: 3848


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 47 of 142 PageID #: 3849


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 48 of 142 PageID #: 3850


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 49 of 142 PageID #: 3851


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 50 of 142 PageID #: 3852


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 51 of 142 PageID #: 3853


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 52 of 142 PageID #: 3854


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 53 of 142 PageID #: 3855


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 54 of 142 PageID #: 3856


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 55 of 142 PageID #: 3857


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 56 of 142 PageID #: 3858


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 57 of 142 PageID #: 3859


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 58 of 142 PageID #: 3860


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 59 of 142 PageID #: 3861


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 60 of 142 PageID #: 3862


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 61 of 142 PageID #: 3863


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 62 of 142 PageID #: 3864


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 63 of 142 PageID #: 3865


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 64 of 142 PageID #: 3866


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 65 of 142 PageID #: 3867


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 66 of 142 PageID #: 3868


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 67 of 142 PageID #: 3869


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 68 of 142 PageID #: 3870


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 69 of 142 PageID #: 3871


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 70 of 142 PageID #: 3872


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 71 of 142 PageID #: 3873


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 72 of 142 PageID #: 3874


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 73 of 142 PageID #: 3875


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 74 of 142 PageID #: 3876


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 75 of 142 PageID #: 3877


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 76 of 142 PageID #: 3878


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 77 of 142 PageID #: 3879


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 78 of 142 PageID #: 3880


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 79 of 142 PageID #: 3881


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 80 of 142 PageID #: 3882


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 81 of 142 PageID #: 3883


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 82 of 142 PageID #: 3884


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 83 of 142 PageID #: 3885


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 84 of 142 PageID #: 3886


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 85 of 142 PageID #: 3887


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 86 of 142 PageID #: 3888


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 87 of 142 PageID #: 3889


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 88 of 142 PageID #: 3890


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 89 of 142 PageID #: 3891


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 90 of 142 PageID #: 3892


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 91 of 142 PageID #: 3893


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 92 of 142 PageID #: 3894


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 93 of 142 PageID #: 3895


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 94 of 142 PageID #: 3896


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 95 of 142 PageID #: 3897


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 96 of 142 PageID #: 3898


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 97 of 142 PageID #: 3899


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 98 of 142 PageID #: 3900


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 99 of 142 PageID #: 3901


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 100 of 142 PageID #: 3902


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 101 of 142 PageID #: 3903


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 102 of 142 PageID #: 3904


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 103 of 142 PageID #: 3905


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 104 of 142 PageID #: 3906


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 105 of 142 PageID #: 3907


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 106 of 142 PageID #: 3908


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 107 of 142 PageID #: 3909


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 108 of 142 PageID #: 3910


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 109 of 142 PageID #: 3911


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 110 of 142 PageID #: 3912


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 111 of 142 PageID #: 3913


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 112 of 142 PageID #: 3914


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 113 of 142 PageID #: 3915


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 114 of 142 PageID #: 3916


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 115 of 142 PageID #: 3917


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 116 of 142 PageID #: 3918


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 117 of 142 PageID #: 3919


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 118 of 142 PageID #: 3920


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 119 of 142 PageID #: 3921


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 120 of 142 PageID #: 3922


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 121 of 142 PageID #: 3923


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 122 of 142 PageID #: 3924


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 123 of 142 PageID #: 3925


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 124 of 142 PageID #: 3926


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 125 of 142 PageID #: 3927


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 126 of 142 PageID #: 3928


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 127 of 142 PageID #: 3929


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 128 of 142 PageID #: 3930


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 129 of 142 PageID #: 3931


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 130 of 142 PageID #: 3932


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 131 of 142 PageID #: 3933


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 132 of 142 PageID #: 3934


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 133 of 142 PageID #: 3935


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 134 of 142 PageID #: 3936


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 135 of 142 PageID #: 3937


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 136 of 142 PageID #: 3938


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 137 of 142 PageID #: 3939


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 138 of 142 PageID #: 3940


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 139 of 142 PageID #: 3941


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 140 of 142 PageID #: 3942


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 141 of 142 PageID #: 3943


Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 277-6 Filed: 10/18/13 142 of 142 PageID #: 3944


277 responsetokcsrmotiontoexclude kmartcombined