Page 1

I exercise:on density CUSCO CITY BLOCK

Politecnico di Torino CDL Magistrale architettura,costruzione e cittĂ UP:Cusco sun city Architecture: Pierre Alain Croset Urban planning:Angelo Sampieri Science of materials:Simonella Pagliolico

group 6 Mirko Mantovan Antonello Delia Margot Robin


I exercise:on density CUSCO CITY BLOCK

Block 6-WANCHAQ area

2002

2012

1-urban analysis


I exercise:on density CUSCO CITY BLOCK

1

2

1 3 3

2 1


I exercise:on density CUSCO CITY BLOCK

site plan-scale 1:500

2- survey-CURRENT STATE


I exercise:on density CUSCO CITY BLOCK elevation from 28 Des Julio

30

29

28

27

elevation from Quinto Paradero street BLOOK666SURVEY SURVEY BLOOK SURVEY BLOOK LOT

1

25

26

23

24

21

208,91

3

208,50

4

202,54

6

19 17

18

15

16

13

14 12

11 9

10 8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

28 Des Julio street

site plan-scale 1:500

QOSCO STREET

7

20

212,10

2

5

22

SURFACE [m

8

213,29 202,27 220,27 211,07

9

210,84

10

204,84

11

211,92

12

199,13

13

219,59

14

210,95

15

212,55

16

206,05

17

211,94

2

]

2

BUILDINGS

HEIGHT [m]

LEVELS

1a

6

2

69,9

1b

3

1

39,03

2a

6

2

73,87

2b

3

1

93,6

3a

3

1

50,68

50,68 78,70

BUILDING SURFACE [m

4a

6

2

78,7

5a

6

2

68,46

5b

3

1

38,78

6a

6

2

49,43

6b

3

1

32,94

7a

6

2

70,14

7b

3

1

53,31

8a

6

2

83,12

8b

3

1

68,65

9a

18

6

164,93

9b

3

1

44,47

10a

6

2

79,18

10b

3

1

47,73

11a

6

2

67,87

11b

3

1

51,05

12a

9

3

97,75

12b

6

2

51,53

13a

3

1

143,46

14a

6

2

58,52

14b

3

1

52,25

15a

6

2

67,59

15b

3

1

50,47

16a

21

7

169,09

17a

9

3

69,02

17b

6

2

77,82

18a

15

5

99,32

18b

6

2

22,88

]

FOOT PRINT SURFACE [m2]

108,93 167,47

107,24 82,37 123,45 151,77 209,40 126,91 118,92 149,28 143,46 110,77 118,06 169,09 146,84

VOLUME [m

419,4

3

]

SLP[m 2]

COEFFICIENTE DE EDIFICATION

EDIFICATION PERCENTAGE

178,83

0,84

51,4%

241,34

1,16

80,2%

152,04

50,68

0,24

24,3%

472,2

157,4

0,78

38,9%

175,7

0,82

50,3%

131,8

0,65

40,7%

193,59

0,88

56,0%

234,89

1,11

71,9%

1034,05

4,90

99,3%

206,09

1,01

62,0%

186,79

0,88

56,1%

396,31

1,99

75,0%

143,46

0,65

65,3%

169,29

0,80

52,5%

185,65

0,87

55,5%

1183,63

5,74

82,1%

362,7

1,71

69,3%

542,36

2,64

59,6%

117,09 443,22 280,8

410,76 116,34 296,58 98,82 420,84 159,93 498,72 205,95 2968,74 133,41 475,08 143,19 407,22 153,15 879,75 309,18 430,38 351,12 156,75 405,54 151,41 3550,89 621,18 466,92 1489,8

18

205,11

19

217,45

19a

6

2

113,41

113,41

680,46

226,82

1,04

52,2%

20

208,00

20a

6

2

126,09

126,09

756,54

252,18

1,21

60,6%

21

213,51

21a

6

2

173,47

173,47

1040,82

346,94

1,62

81,2%

22

205,36

22a

21

7

171,12

171,12

3593,52

1197,84

5,83

83,3%

23

215,95

23a

6

2

94,51

94,51

567,06

189,02

0,88

43,8%

24

205,51

24a

18

6

100,32

24b

6

2

52,13

706,18

3,44

74,2%

25

215,93

292,26

1,35

45,1%

177,62

0,84

47,1%

26

210,31

27

220,42

28

212,03

29

311,43

30

300,52

TOT

6508,29

122,20

152,45

137,28

1805,76 312,78

25a

9

3

97,42

26a

9

3

39,31

26b

3

1

59,69

27a

9

3

99,6

99,60

896,4

298,8

1,36

45,2%

89,29

267,87

89,29

0,42

42,1%

411,73

1,32

70,7%

326,51

1,09

64,9%

10289,75

1,58

60,18%

28a

3

1

89,29

29a

12

4

63,9

29b

3

1

156,13

30a

6

2

131,51

30b

3

1

63,49

97,42 99,00

220,03 195,00

3916,93

876,78 353,79 179,07

766,8 468,39 789,06 190,47 30869,25


I exercise:on density CUSCO CITY BLOCK

axonometric view-north


I exercise:on density CUSCO CITY BLOCK

axonometric view-south


3-densification hypotesis


UNGERS -ROOSVELT ISLAND main points: -combination of morphological range of models with the ideas on variety within unity and the city in miniature. -Assembling theme,fragmentation,�the house inside the house�. -Open block development Christian Portzanparc

references


The block was arranged following 2 factors: -the street hierarchy - existing building typology and building arrangement The goal here was to maintain the existing building height considering Ungers as reference for what concerns the assembing block Definition of the corner through the building height Creation of a uniform front towards the new boulevard Work on the courts typology,redefinition of the C shape, creation of new enlarged spaces using the modular type.

TOT SURFACE:6508,29 m² FOOT PRINT SURFACE:3797,73 m² VOLUME:41439,38 m3 SLP:13904,66 m² COEFFICIENTE DI EDIFICATION:2,14 EDIFICATION PERCENTAGE: 58,35%

site plan-scale 1:500

IPOTESE 1-50%


axonometric view-north west

IPOTESE 1-50%


axonometric view-south east

IPOTESE 1-50%


The block was arranged following 1 factors: - the existing building typology and building arrangement In this case we lost the tall building defining the angle as in the first hypotesis Here the aim is to mantain theliear configuration of the inear building type-considering their rhytm and the cohexistence with low density building placed in between Working on a new arrangement,scattered on the new boulevard and creation of a linear front on the other sidpermitting the creation of private internal spaces

TOT SURFACE:6508,29 m² FOOT PRINT SURFACE:3596,03m² VOLUME:40336,80 m3 SLP:13445,60 m² COEFFICIENTE DI EDIFICATION:2,07 EDIFICATION PERCENTAGE: 55,25%

site plan-scale 1:500

IPOTESE 2-50%


axonometric view-north west

IPOTESE 2-50%


axonometric view-south east

IPOTESE 2-50%


The block was arranged following 2 factors: -the street hierarchy - existing building typology and building arrangement The importance of the corner formed by via 28 Des Julio and Qosco street has been stressed by the building height Via 28 Des Julio has the potential of becoming a boulevard that’s why the height is maintained,but the buildings now are conceived as scattered elements in order to continue the following arrangements The other side of the block presented an interesting disposition of the open and closed court type,since the street is more private the work focused on this specific building type To improve visibility the buildings facing the street are lower and are conceived to be single residetial houses while the one located inside the block are heigher.

TOT SURFACE:6508,29 m² FOOT PRINT SURFACE:3703,07m² VOLUME:40001,85 m3 SLP:13657,99 m² COEFFICIENTE DI EDIFICATION:2,10 EDIFICATION PERCENTAGE: 56,90%

plan view-scale 1:500

IPOTESE 1-100%


axonometric view-north west

IPOTESE 1-100%


axonometric view-south east

IPOTESE 1-100%

Ex on density group 6  
Advertisement