750 Moraga Way, Orinda, CA 94563 (925) 376-4423 Ext. 331 or Room 333 email@example.com
Brooke Woodward, Jeremy Unger Editors-in-Chief
Caroline Golden Managing Editor
Elizabeth Lenczowski News Editor
Samantha Zulch Opinion Editor
Katherine Doyle Feature Editor
Grant Huhn, Nicholas Eliason Sports Editors
Evelyn Alper, Laila Abtahi, Sophia Bollag, James Boudreau, Jessica Coleman, Austin Controulis, Caroline Cook, Lauren Dahlberg-Seeth, Craig Dathe, Megan Freeman, Brian Friel, Eric Hass, Katrina Kovalik, Mackenzie Lee, Sean McGeer, Madeleine Neuburger, Jamie Riley, Michael Roe, Aleck Ryner, Alex Seclow, Lauren Stewart, Hannah Tennant, Dani Vignos, Kelsey Williams
Melissa Quiter Faculty Adviser
Placing truth, accuracy and objectivity first.
Letters to the Editor: Editorials re-
flect the opinions of the majority of Mirador’s editorial board. Editorial topics are chosen by a consensus of section editors. Mirador solicits letters to the editor. Signed letters to the editors can be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org or placed in Mrs. Quiter’s box. Unsigned letters will not be published but names can be withheld by request. The editorial board reserves the right to edit letters for clarity and length.
Email mhsmirador@ gmail.com and tell us what you think.
2/5/10 Opinion 3
What the Numbers Really Tell Us The numbers are in: the 2010 U.S.News & World Report ranking of America’s Best High Schools shows our very own Miramonte as 89th in the Nation (just below Campolindo at number 86). That our school made the top 100 (the U.S.News “Gold Medal List”) certainly deserves some celebration and pride. A high national ranking means increased home values in Lamorinda, as well as even one more qualification for students to offer prospective colleges. But before we start the party, what do these numbers really mean? Upon what criteria is this ranking conducted? It’s important to understand the various qualities that make Miramonte so successful. Even more importantly, we must acknowledge these factors’ dependence on our districts’ funding, which state budget cuts, and the current economic crisis, seriously threaten. When trying to understand the ranking process, it’s first necessary to note that the U.S.News & World Report school ranking and analysis is “based on the key principles that a great high school must serve all its students well, not just those who are college bound,” according to the U.S.News online forum. Just because an exceptionally high percentage of Miramonte graduates go on to college doesn’t mean our school can cater solely to them. A good education is more than getting into competitive schools, and that is something these rankings strive to reflect. The ranking also omits certain schools such as charters or those that fail to produce measurable academic outcomes on which the school can be judged. Schools must fit the specific criteria in order to be rated, although schools that don’t may still receive honorable mention. Regarding specific ranking methodology, the data is very complex, but it all boils down to three categories of comparison: school test scores, performance of a school’s leastadvantaged students (i.e. minorities, low-income students, etc.), and college readiness (determined by AP or IB participation rates). While Miramonte’s national ranking may not be a top concern as our school district faces a scheduled budget cut of $4.8 million for the 2010-2011 school year, we have to realize that the very factors that give Miramonte such a high ranking are those that will be extinguished by these cuts: the fundamentals of a quality
education. With such a significant cut to the budget, the Acalanes Union High School District will be forced to lay off teachers, counselors, librarians, and other district employees. Classes, both popular electives and crucial academic subjects, will be cut relative to the size of their department, and class sizes will undoubtedly increase. Miramonte’s prestige of offering numerous and well-taught Advanced Placement courses will plummet if a significant number of these AP classes are eliminated. How well would Miramonte rank in “college readiness” if students had no collegelevel courses to take? Not well. Once again, we must make the connection between a number in a magazine and the fundamentals of valuable high school education. If Miramonte’s goal as a school switches from providing students with a high quality and widely varied curriculum to simply struggling to cover even basic graduation requirements, factors such as test performance will suffer. Let us pat ourselves on the back today for the achievement of number 89, but we cannot ignore the challenges of tomorrow. Miramonte’s high national ranking and the high quality education justifying that rank, cannot be maintained with our state funding cut by $4.8 million. A parcel tax in our community will help and is vital in keeping the district afloat. A $112 per parcel increase added to additional MHS Parents’ Club and EFO contributions should essentially cover the deficit for now, hopefully saving jobs and classes. A temporary tax increase however, will not cure the long-term financial problems facing education. Our state’s economic wellbeing is suffering and considering the policy trends thus far, our schools are going to continue to pay the price. The Lamorinda community should Graphic: S. Zulch continue to do all that it can at our local level, but until the state and federal governments develop an effective solution to the economic crisis, we are going to have to prepare for a lowered standard of educational quality and as long as that’s the case, we can wave goodbye to any “Gold Medal List” dreams for the future.
The Editorial Board voted 11-0 in favor
Television Corrupts Us, Or Vice Versa? by Brooke Woodward
When we turn on our televisions nowadays we get 700 channels of “news” and “entertainment.” However, we are really subjecting ourselves to 700 different ways to waste our time and corrupt our minds. Television began as a genuine entertainment outlet for the good of society. Families would settle down in their living rooms with their “T.V. dinners” to enjoy the Dick Van Dyke Show or Bewitched. However, as the use of television expanded, cable network took the stage and began prioritizing profit over quality and ethics in order to satisfy popular demand. As a result, “family television” is a thing of the past. Flavor of Love, The Real World, and I Love New York have replaced The Brady Bunch and Leave it to Beaver. Even programs such as Disney Channel and Nickelodeon, which were once wholesome and child-oriented, have been infested by television series about misbehaving kids who have little or no concept of reality or morals. These shows infiltrate the minds of today’s youth and disrupt the fragile foundations of their morality. As television spiraled downwards, so did society. Or was it the reverse? Most likely the two went hand and hand. The Jerry Springer Show started in 1991 as a program to advise people on how to deal with their problems, but as approval ratings increased in sync with the level of violence, controversy, and flamboyancy on the show, their priorities took a sharp turn. Today, the show is promoting its new “Uncensored: Naughty Naked World Tour.” Instead of catering television towards families and striving for worth, networks are seeking the “shock factor” in order to capture people’s attention and boost their own profits. Shows have to hook viewers with a 15 second glimpse of “next week’s
show” or the “season finale” and often insert scandalous clips in order to catch their audience’s attention. Shamefully, these previews work because this is exactly the kind of television that many people want to watch. Furthermore, between each show are equally unethical commercials. Advertising reflects the content of the television shows in order to appeal to the audience and accordingly advance profits. Luckily, modern technology allows many people to skip commercials altogether while using devices such as TiVo, Comcast On Demand, and DVR’s. Society has become absorbed with the fantasies on television and people have begun to replicate this negativity in their own lives. For example, many teenage girls strive to reproduce the profligate lifestyles of Gossip Girl or they ignorantly mimic the vulgarity of South Park. The world’s growing obsession with superficiality and cupidity may be a direct result of the materialistic values that bombard us when we turn on our televisions. The modern world’s fascination with television may be hard if not impossible to reverse. If we continue to fuel the television industry’s negativity by watching worthless shows, the deterioration of society’s values will persist. However, if people limit their viewing to quality programs such as The Discovery Channel or Gilmore Girls, useless shows’ approval ratings will decrease and stations will be forced to reconsider their priorities. In today’s world, we endeavor to live in secure neighborhoods, yet we must keep children safe by locking channels on the television in addition to our front doors. Unless people acknowledge television’s negativity and refuse to promote it, society is destined for a future of increasing materialism, uniformity, obscenity, and immorality.
Published on Feb 4, 2010
Published on Feb 4, 2010
Marina Allen Davis Louie Melissa Quiter Placing truth, accuracy and objectivity first. Staff Writers 2/5/10 Opinion 3 The Editorial Board vo...