The Protection of Endangered Species: A Working Effort or Failed Attempt

Part 4: Comparison and Contrasts The GOA would most likely agree with farmers and ranchers who view that the wolf should be delisted from the Endangered Species List [1, 6]. The GOA would also agree with the facts presented by private land owners who claim that because it is their property, they should be able to do what they want on it [20]. However compared to the claims from RedOrbit the GOA would disagree stating that Pombo’s bill is ineffective and instead of reviewing the bill, they should abolish the ESA [7].

Part 5: Uses in the Essay The GOA’s letter will be helpful in the History and Background section of the essay.

Their rebuttal to Pombo’s bill will be helpful to discuss what the government has been doing so far to address the current public policy issue. The letter will also be useful in the first subissue of the essay dealing with conservation efforts being effective. The GOA’s opinions will be useful to show reasons why the ESA doesn’t work and the problems that are caused by it.