Page 1

Print Form

College of Business Administration and Public Policy

Peer Review Outcomes LOTTERY GRANT Reviewer Name: Course Reviewed: Course Instructor:

I recommend this course for online publication. I recommend this course for re-submission, see comments below.

Comments:

Reviewer: Please list your findings for the course you peer reviewed. -Under Practices, please choose the qualities that were evident in your findings. (See the bullet points for each quality level on the PR rubric). -Under Evidence, please list the actual content that you found that supports the practice. An example has been done for you below.

EXAMPLE Element A

Social Rapport

Practices:

Evidence:

-One brief intro at beginning of course. -One other exchange of personal information among students. -One other in-class opportunity designed to increase social rapport among students.

-Instructor has a 4 minute introductory video posted in which she welcomes students to the course and encourages an open-door policy for communication. -Course has an assignment in which students are asked specific questions about themselves that are important to the course. The questions are shared with all students in the class through a threaded discussion and are able to ask their own questions to help build their online peer-relationships. -Course has another in-class opportunity in which each student creates her own blog and posts responses to a series of writing assignments throughout the course.


Element A

Social Rapport

Practices:

Element B

Evidence:

Communication

Practices:

Element C

Evidence:

Course Engagement

Practices:

Element D Practices:

Evidence:

Learning Levels Evidence:

Peer Review Outcomes  
Peer Review Outcomes  

A form utilized during course peer review. Findings are listed in two categories: Practices, and Evidence.

Advertisement