College of Business Administration and Public Policy
Peer Review Outcomes LOTTERY GRANT Reviewer Name: Course Reviewed: Course Instructor:
I recommend this course for online publication. I recommend this course for re-submission, see comments below.
Reviewer: Please list your findings for the course you peer reviewed. -Under Practices, please choose the qualities that were evident in your findings. (See the bullet points for each quality level on the PR rubric). -Under Evidence, please list the actual content that you found that supports the practice. An example has been done for you below.
EXAMPLE Element A
-One brief intro at beginning of course. -One other exchange of personal information among students. -One other in-class opportunity designed to increase social rapport among students.
-Instructor has a 4 minute introductory video posted in which she welcomes students to the course and encourages an open-door policy for communication. -Course has an assignment in which students are asked specific questions about themselves that are important to the course. The questions are shared with all students in the class through a threaded discussion and are able to ask their own questions to help build their online peer-relationships. -Course has another in-class opportunity in which each student creates her own blog and posts responses to a series of writing assignments throughout the course.
Element D Practices:
Learning Levels Evidence:
Published on Jan 25, 2011