Page 1

Showdown: Maryland to Target 110,000 Citizens With Gun Confiscation Paul Joseph Watson March 5, 2014

New law would link gun registry with criminal database Authorities in Maryland are set to target 110,000 citizens with gun confiscation under a new law that would link the state’s gun registry with its criminal database, with new troopers set to be hired to enforce door to door visits of illegal gun owners. Maryland State Police complain that there is no way for them to identify gun owners who have been convicted of felonies, meaning they can’t check if weapons have been relinquished in accordance with state law. New legislation being considered by the Maryland House of Delegates would allow police to run checks of the state’s gun registry against its criminal database at least twice a year at a cost of $300,000 dollars to create the new system. “State Police estimate that if they linked the databases, they would find 10 percent of registered gun owners — about 110,000 people — would be disqualified. They estimate a rate of 1 percent each year thereafter,” reports the Associated Press, adding that “seven new full-time troopers to investigate findings from the new database,” would be hired, “with a cost of more than $1 million a year for salaries and equipment.” In other words, more armed police would be needed to conduct dangerous door to door gun confiscations of the thousands of people that would be snagged under the new law. “This smacks of a police state mentality,” said Maryland resident Ronald Smith in written testimony before a hearing on Tuesday. While the law is ostensibly aimed at disarming criminals, we have seen a steady expansion of reasons that are being applied to bar Americans from owning firearms. The law also creates a chilling effect on the second amendment by implying that gun owners are all guilty until proven innocent.

Last year we reported on how US Navy Veteran David A Schmecker had his guns confiscated by police after a forced “psychiatric evaluation” despite him having no criminal or psychiatric history. In August 2012, we reported on how a veteran in Ohio had his guns taken because he was adjudged to be mentally incompetent, despite the fact that his previous VA psychiatric evaluations were all clear, he was not on medication, and he had no criminal record. In February 2012, David Sarti, one of the stars of National Geographic’s Doomsday Preppers show, visited his doctor complaining of chest pains, only to have the doctor later commit him to a psychiatric ward and alert authorities, before Sarti was declared “mentally defective” and put on an FBI list that stripped him of his second amendment rights. Maryland’s preparations for gun confiscation arrive on the back of a similar showdown in Connecticut, where a vast majority of residents refused to register their assault rifles and high capacity magazines in accordance with a new law that took effect on January 1. Gun groups are now challenging authorities to either proceed with mass gun confiscation or repeal the law in full.

Guns, Schools, Mind Control, Revolution Jon Rappoport March 5, 2014

“Padre, these are subtleties. We’re not concerned with motives, with the higher ethics. We are concerned only with cutting down crime–and. . .with relieving the ghastly congestion in our prisons. He will be your true Christian: ready to turn the other cheek, ready to be crucified rather than crucify, sick to the very heart at the thought even of killing a fly! Reclamation! Joy before the angels of God! The point is that it works.” — A Clockwork Orange, Anthony Burgess, 1962. Fingers pointed like a gun. A pop tart chewed into the shape of a gun. A toy gun. All over America, schools are exercising what they call zero tolerance policy to suspend young children packing “suggestions of guns.”

Behind this practice is the idea that populations can be conditioned against owning real guns. Start early, indoctrinate the kids, and society will change. In turn, such thinking rests on the premise that human beings are Pavlovian dogs. Programmed biological machines. If the program currently running is faulty, and fails to obey the mandate of “greatest good for the greatest number,” change the program. If the brain reveals a chemical imbalance (although no research has even established a baseline for normal balance), insert psychiatric drugs and correct the problem. Maintain surveillance on the entire population, thus convincing millions they may be potential lawbreakers…and they will modify their behavior, they will toe the line, they will march straight ahead and keep their mouths shut. As this sort of flawed reasoning expands and spreads, people begin to believe that a model of radical reconstruction is viable and good. For instance, how many people would now respond favorably to the idea that “everyone can be programmed to forget guns even exist”? How many people would agree to a program that “guaranteed” racial prejudice would be wiped from human memory? How many people would happily respond to the notion that environmental destruction, as an impulse, could be removed from the brain? How many of these people would even notice that such programs were eliminating freedom? And if they did notice, how many would care? Operant conditioning and mind control could have side effects? What does that mean, if freedom was never real in the first place? A recent opinion piece in the Harvard Crimson, by student Sandra YL Korn, was subtitled: “Let’s give up on academic freedom in favor of justice.” Korn asserted that academic research promoting “oppression” should be stopped. Perhaps you can imagine what a university council, convened to define and rule on “justice,” would look and sound like. (Question for consideration by the Committee: should University funds for African-American lefthanded lesbians supersede monies devoted to correcting unequal treatment of differently-abled wheelchair-bound Hispanic immigrants whose parents descend from bloodlines of Spanish conquistadors in the New World?) The idea that you can obliterate “bad parts” of the brain and preserve the good parts is now embedded in standard science. It is childish, absurd, and dangerous to the extreme. Brain researchers are, on the whole, disinterested in the law. They aim to create a new species for whom no laws will be needed. People will do the right thing, because their upgraded brains tell them to. If these researchers and their allies succeed, what we are now calling revolutions will be as pop tarts are to ICBMs. We’ll have mass uprisings that will shake the Earth. Because when freedom is slipping away, is actually being drained away, and when people know it, in their bones, when they can no longer deny it or sleep through it, they will show exactly how important they think it is. They will no longer believe that all this programming and brain research are aimed at curing illness. They will understand the madness being visited on them.

CT State Police Spokesman Says They Would Participate In Door To Door Gun Confiscations By February 27, 2014

The State of Connecticut says that all citizens must register rifles and high capacity magazines, or be charged will a felony. As many as 350,000 people could face heavily armed police smashing down their doors and be charged with a felony. The legislature of Connecticut says that a registration is needed so they can know where the guns are. Yet at the same time, they are sending threatening letters to gun owners. So they already have records of who has purchased certain guns. The fact is, that the Connecticut legislature fully intends to confiscate hundreds of thousands of firearms anyway. The registration process will simply make it easier to confiscate, because you acknowledge that you still own a firearm that the state already suspects that you own. In a recorded phone call Connecticut State Police Spokesman Lt. Vance was reached at at (860) 6858290 and says that state police would comply with an order from the state to conduct door to door gun confiscations. Experts claim that as many as 350,000 people are in violation of the law, and over 100,000 of those people could face felony charges. That means over 3.6% of the entire adult population of Connecticut has been transformed into a felon by the new registration law. Roughly one in twenty Connecticut homes could have their doors smashed in by heavily armed law enforcement seeking to confiscate firearms. Famed Sandy Hook Connecticut State Policeman Says Opposing Gun Grab Is Un-American VIDEO BELOW

Department Of Injustice Bypasses Congress To Start Building A National Gun Database By Binaryloop March 3, 2014 Eric “Gun Runner” Holder’s Department of Justice is preparing to announce new regulations designed to expand the national background check system for gun sales. White House records reveal the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has completed its review of the DOJ rule, one of 23 executive actions ordered by President Obama more than a year ago. The final rule sets out three changes to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS): 1. Grant tribal police access to NICS 2. Authorize law enforcement agencies to use the system to run full background checks before returning guns that have been seized or confiscated during the course of investigations. 3. To expand consolidated, electronic storage of information on gun purchases that have been denied via the NICS system, according to a rulemaking notice issued in January. All of this is being done without approval from Congress. President Obama is expected to rubber stamp these proposed regulations without any additional debate or oversight. The real question is: “How far will they expand the system?” What will they be storing in NICS and how long will they be storing it? In the past, there have been strict guidelines to prevent abuse. This Executive Order, and the new DOJ recommendations seem to be aimed towards changing these guidelines. Bloomberg Moves To Ban Pro-Gun Speech VIDEO BELOW


Showdown: Maryland to Target 110,000 Citizens With Gun Confiscation  

New law would link gun registry with criminal database Authorities in Maryland are set to target 110