Page 1

Resolution Threatens Obama Impeachment Kurt Nimmo March 12, 2012 If Obama works with the United Nations and NATO against Syria and does not seek authorization from Congress for the use of the U.S. military, he may face impeachment, according to a resolution introduced by Republican Representative Walter B. Jones Jr. Obama Admin Cites 'Int'l Permission,' Not Congress, As 'Legal Basis' For Action In Syria “Expressing the sense of congress that the use of offensive military force by a president without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution,” the resolution states. Jones introduced his resolution after Obama’s Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey told Senator Jeff Sessions during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing last week that they would seek “international permission” to attack Syria. Congrerss would not be consulted, but merely informed of the decision. “Our goal would be to seek international permission and we would… come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress – I think those are issues we would have to discuss as we decide what to do here,” Panetta told Sessions. “Well, I’m almost breathless about that,” the senator from Alabama replied, “because what I heard you say is, ‘We’re going to seek international approval, and then we’ll come and tell the Congress what we might do, and we might seek congressional approval.’ And I just want to say to you that’s a big [deal].” Panetta said a NATO or United Nations resolution would provide the legal basis for using U.S. troops in

military action against Syria. “They can provide no legal authority. The only legal authority that is required to deploy the United States military is of the Congress and the president and the law and the Constitution,” Sessions told Panetta. The startling admission led to Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., to introduce “an official resolution calling for impeachment should Obama take offensive action based on Panetta’s policy statement, because it would violate the Constitution,” former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo told WorldNetDaily on Sunday. Obama’s decision to avoid Congress and violate the Constitution takes on a renewed urgency this week as the UN Security Council meets to discuss the Syria issue. Any UN decision to attack Syria following the failure of talks with the country’s leader, Bashar al-Assad, over the weekend would be questionable since both Russia and China are opposed to military intervention. In February, Russia and China vetoed a resolution condemning Syria’s clamp down on the opposition. Assad said over the weekend his government will not negotiate while “armed terrorist groups were still operating in the country.” The Free Syria Army (FSA) fighting against Assad inside Syria is a creation of NATO. Sources indicate 600 to 1,500 fighters from the Islamic Fighting Group in Libya, now known as al-Qaeda in Libya, are working with the FSA to topple the Assad regime. An Arab League report revealed last month that Mossad, MI6, the CIA, and British SAS are in Syria working with the Free Syrian Army and the Syrian National Council. Syria blames “terrorist gangs” backed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar for much of the violence in the country, according to Syrian Information Minister Adnan Mahmoud. Media Cover-up Of Obama Impeachment Exposed! MOVIE BELOW

The Obama Deception MOVIE BELOW Fall of the Republic MOVIE BELOW

America Is Being Transformed From A Wealthy Nation Into A Poor Nation At Breathtaking Speed The American Dream Monday, March 12, 2012 America is losing wealth far faster than any other nation on earth is. In fact, since the mid-1970s there has been a transfer of wealth of almost 8 trillion dollars from the United States to the rest of the world. Sadly, most Americans have no idea what is happening. Most of them are completely unaware that America is being transformed from a wealthy nation into a poor nation at breathtaking speed. Most Americans just assume that America will always have the largest economy on earth and will always be the wealthiest nation on the globe. Unfortunately, just because something was true in the past does not mean that it will be true in the future. Right now, the United States is bleeding wealth at a pace that is almost unimaginable. Every single month, tens of billions of dollars of wealth is permanently transferred from the American people to the rest of the world. That means that the overall economic pie is shrinking. While the rich and the poor are busy fighting over the distribution of wealth in this country, the size of the pie that they are dividing up is continually getting smaller. America is poorer than it was last month, and next month it will be even poorer. If this continues, it will result in a complete and total economic nightmare. Let’s break this down to a real simple example. Imagine that you are playing a game with a whole bunch of people, and you have been chosen to play the role of the United States. So you go stand on a giant map of the United States and you are given much more money than anyone else in the game. However, with each turn 50 billion dollars is taken out of your pile of money and is given to the other players. What is going to happen eventually? Yes, that is right – you are going to run out of money at some point. In order to continue playing you will need to borrow more money from the other players or you will need to print up some more money. Does that sound familiar? In January, the U.S. trade deficit with the rest of the world hit 52.6 billion dollars. That means that we bought 52.6 billion dollars more stuff from the rest of the world than they

bought from us. That 52.6 billion dollars is gone and it is not coming back. Next month another 50 billion dollars will leave the country. Are you starting to get the picture? Imagine a giant hourglass filled with dollar bills. Dollars are pouring out of the United States and into the pockets of foreigners at a pace that is absolutely astounding. In 2011, the U.S. trade deficit with the rest of the world was about 560 billion dollars. We have a trade imbalance that is more than 5 times larger than any other nation on earth has. That means that we are getting poorer at a far faster rate than anyone else is. Most of the money that we spend does not even do any lasting good. For example, a huge chunk of our trade deficit is spent on importing oil. Once we burn that oil up in our cars it is gone for good and we have nothing to show for it. But the people we sent our money to end up with bulging bank accounts. How in the world do you think those oil barons build those outrageous palaces and are able to afford those exotic car collections? They buy all those things with the money that we sent to them. Meanwhile, our once great major cities are degenerating into festering sores. Our foolish policies are causing our own destruction. Another reason why we have such a huge trade deficit is because of our trade relationship with China. Our trade deficit with China was approximately 26 billion dollars during the month of January. That is absolutely horrifying. For the entire year of 2011, our trade deficit with China hit a grand total of about 295.5 billion dollars. That was the largest trade deficit that one country has had with another country in the history of the world. Back in 1985, the U.S. trade deficit with China was only 6 million dollars for the entire year. In 2011, our trade deficit with China was more than 49,000 times larger than it was back in 1985. That is not a good trend. Have you ever noticed that it seems like half the stuff we sell in our stores says “Made in China�

on it? Well, that is because China is wiping the floor with us on the global economic stage. Just look at how the overall U.S. trade deficit has exploded over the past few decades. In the chart below, we see that the U.S. trade deficit really spiked when the price of oil reached unprecedented heights a few years ago. Then it dropped during the recession when the price of oil fell like a rock. But now the U.S. trade deficit is almost back to where it was before‌.

Today, the U.S. trade deficit with the rest of the world is about 5 times larger than it was back in 1996. That means that we are getting poorer as a nation at a rate that is 5 times faster than back in 1996. All of that money that is going out of the country could be going to support jobs and businesses inside the United States. But instead we have been losing jobs and businesses over the past decade at a rate that is absolutely amazing. According to U.S. Representative Betty Sutton, an average of 23 manufacturing facilities a day closed down in the United States during 2010. 23 every single day! That means less jobs for American workers. Right now, there are approximately 6 million fewer jobs in America than there was back in December 2007. Because there are not enough jobs, we now have millions of working age Americans that simply cannot take care of themselves.

But it isn’t just jobs that we are losing. There are a whole host of other statistics that show that economic conditions in America continue to get worse and worse and worse. An all-time record 46.5 million Americans are on food stamps and poverty continues to explode all over nation. Instead of addressing the root causes of our problems, our leaders continue to support our false standard of living by borrowing gigantic piles of money. In many instances, we go back to the very same people that we sent our money to and we beg them to borrow it back. How stupid can we be? Debt always makes you even poorer in the long run. Take a look at how our budget deficits on the national level have absolutely exploded in recent years….

Anyone that tells you that America is in good shape financially is lying. Just look at that chart. Sadly, the truth is even worse than the chart shows. For example, there never was a “surplus” under the Clinton administration. The U.S. government simply stole money from Social Security and used a bunch of other accounting tricks to make things seem a lot better than they were. And the U.S. government is still using all sorts of accounting tricks to hide the true size of the national debt. If you doubt this, just read this article. If the U.S. government was forced to use GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), the U.S. budget deficit would be far larger each year.

But it is not just the federal government that is drowning in debt. All over the country right now, municipalities are going broke…. *Harrisburg, Pennsylvania has announced that it will be skipping debt payments. *Stockton, California is on the verge of becoming the largest U.S. municipality to ever file for bankruptcy. For years, our politicians borrowed immense amounts of money to make up for all of the wealth that we were bleeding as a nation. But now we are absolutely drowning in debt and all of this reckless spending is not going to be able to last much longer. When all of this reckless spending ends, our false prosperity is going to disappear. Did you know that the U.S. national debt is growing by about 150 million dollars every single hour? 150 million dollars an hour is being stolen from our children and our grandchildren so that we can maintain our false standard of living. Most Americans expect things to get back to “normal”, but the truth is that “normal” has left the building. Our transition from being a wealthy nation to being a poor nation continues every single day, and our politicians are doing nothing to stop it. Enjoy these good times while you still can, because they are not going to last too much longer. The debt bubble we have been living in is going to burst, and when it does we are going to get hit with a cold dose of reality.

Grassley Asks DOJ Again if They’ve Taken Action Against Wall Street The Blog of Legal Times March 12, 2012

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is pushing the Department of Justice for details on what it has done to pursue criminal charges against the major Wall Street banks and executives who he says are responsible for the nation’s financial crisis. In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. issued today, Grassley asked for a list of cases that detail which convictions were obtained against CEOs, CFOs, board members, presidents and other executives of Wall Street firms and banks. The letter comes two days after Grassley criticized the DOJ response to the financial crisis during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. And it comes in direct response to reaction from the DOJ posted on the Blog of Legal Times, according to a Grassley spokeswoman. At a Capitol Hill hearing Wednesday on foreclosure abuse and lending discrimination practices, Grassley said the DOJ has done a “terrible job” of prosecuting financial crimes. He said: “The Justice Department has brought no criminal cases against any of the major Wall Street banks or executives who are responsible for the financial crisis.” In response to a Legal Times request, DOJ issued a written statement on the criticism. “The Department of Justice, through our U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and litigating divisions, has brought thousands of mortgage fraud cases over the past three years, and secured numerous convictions against CEOs, CFOs, board members, presidents and other executives of Wall Street firms and banks for financial crimes," DOJ spokeswoman Laura Sweeney said. Grassley requested the list by the end of the month. A DOJ spokesman said the agency is reviewing the letter.

1960s: Slums of Chicago Used As “Laboratory” By Rockefeller’s Population Council Jurriaan Maessen March 12, 2012 Until now unsuspected and undetected, a publication surfaces straight from the Rockefeller Archives which speaks of eugenic mind-operations on the black community of Chicago in the early 1960s. In an outright chilling speech the two men in charge of the operations, Donald Bogue and Palmore, told the American Public Health Association in 1964 that they were “”using the slums of Chicago as a ‘laboratory,’” hoping to develop “principles and theories which could be ‘exported’ overseas.“”, Ph.D. candidate Edmund Ramsden reveals in his paper Between Quality and Quantity: The Population Council and the Politics of “Science-making” in Eugenics and Demography, 1952-1965. Donald Bogue. After writing extensively on John D. Rockefeller III and his commitment to continue his forefather’s eugenic dream (to create an elite super-race while simultaneously depopulate the planet), Ramsden (now a doctor of the University of Exeter and the London School of Economics) managed to retrieve some mind-blowing findings from the Rockefeller Archive. Quite inadvertently, it seems, the Ph.D-to-be stumbled upon evidence from within the archives of the Rockefellers themselves, which conclusivelyproves that “Chicago’s negro population” was subjected to experiments in a laboratory-setting conducted by Rockefeller’s “finest” social engineers. According to the material Ramsden consulted in the Rockefeller Archives, the chief-operators Bogue and Palmore “attempted to uncover general patterns of resistance to birth control that existed in the developed and developing nations and drew parallels between “the crude birth rate of Chicago’s Negro population,” the rural

South, India, and Puerto Rico.” “The Population Council (…)”, he writes,“funded the University of Chicago in 1962-63 for a research program in “Problems of Bearing and Rearing Children in High-Fertility, Low-Income, Low-Education American Families.”” The implementation of this mysterious Problems of Bearing and Rearing Childrenin High-Fertility, Low-Income, Low-Education American Familiesprogram on American families was executed with the help of several clinics, propagandists and other individuals, roaming the streets of Chicago during a good part of the 1960s. “This”, writes Ramsden, “would be the first grant by the Population Council to evaluate an action program in the United States, and involved the establishment of a mobile communications center and clinic, the employment of medical personnel and social workers, interviewers, technical staff, the preparation of family planning communications materials, machine tabulation costs, and so on.” Ramsden only skimmed over the subject in his paper, as it was helpful but not essential to his report. However we learn some more about the tactics used by these “mobile communication centers and clinics” in Mary Ziegler’s excellent Reinventing Eugenics: Reproductive Choice and Law Reform After World War II: “Bogue’s assistants sent targeted mailings to people living in housing projects and advertised in what Bogue called “ethnic newspapers,” like the Chicago Defender. Frequently, he used volunteers who appeared to be objective or even friendly to dispense advice. African-American volunteers were instructed to befriend people in the neighborhoods studied before advising them to stop having children. Those with medical training were supposed to characterize their recommendations as objective medical advice rather than as propaganda put out by the Council.” As Ramsden continues on the subject he writes something astonishing. Here is the quote in full: “In 1963 this program was enlarged, through Population Council support, with the establishment of the Family Planning Communication-Motivation Workshop as part of the demographer Donald Bogue’s plan to develop “Training and Research Program for Fertility Control Through Action Programs.” Speaking to the American Public Health Association in 1964, Bogue and Palmore explained that they were testing hypotheses for hastening the adoption of birth control practices and using mass communication and group motivation “campaigns” among groups with low education and low income. They explicitly stated that they were “using the slums of Chicago as a ‘laboratory,’” hoping to develop “principles and theories which could be ‘exported’ overseas.” We stress that the quotes applied by Ramsden in the before mentioned citation are literal notes

from the Rockefeller Archives. Ramsden himself examined the Archives extensively but casually skimmed over this particular fact he uncovered, as he set out to compile a general history of eugenics in the United States. An interesting read for sure. But the author hardly appreciated the fact that the admissions by Bogue and his colleague uncovered two important facts that have never before seen the light of day, namely 1: that the Chicago-experiment was designed to subject American families in a laboratory-setting to birth control-propaganda, and 2: export the results of these experiments to Third World nations with the aim of reducing the birthrate worldwide. We must not forget when quoting these people, that the inhabitants of Chicago’s slums were American families with children. When presenting these cold facts it does not do to become desensitized or to shrug our shoulders in superficial indignation- for it is a terrible thing, when people in power target the human mind for their pleasure, systematically undermine their dreams and that in service of that ultimate vision: to exterminate “the unfit” in favor of a self-proclaimed biocratic elite. And that is exactly what Bogue and Palmore set out to do as they attempted to halt “the crude birth rate of Chicago’s Negro population”. This, of course, is a telltale sign of a eugenic operation underway, perhaps executed under the name “social development project”, perhaps under “family planning for the poor”- but eugenics is what it is, because it involves specifically targeting underprivileged and ethnic minorities in a “laboratory”-setting to export the findings to other people they seek to snuff out. Ramsden: “For Bogue, the (…) “incompetents” were predominately the underprivileged “Negro and Puerto Rican” and other low-income residents on “public welfare” in the rural South, the Chicago slums, and low-income housing developments. He celebrated the development of “wonder drugs” that would “cure” the “really ‘sick’ patients,” such as the birth control pill. He exclaimed ecstatically to Notestein in July 1961 that the “all-Negro, low-income group is taking oral contraception like wildfire.” Similarly, the Population Council post-partum program was justified, as in earlier eugenic literature, in terms of a community cost-saving exercise through the reduction of the fertility of socially and “medially indigent population” who reproduced at tax payers’ expense.” That Bogue’s statements are not exaggerations or misquotations, but rather completely consistent

with other statements he made during the course of the 1960s, is strikingly evident by his 1966 paper Population Growth, Problems, And Trends in the United States in which Bogue argues: “Can the Negro population be assimilated in the near future or are Negroes likely to remain segregated and deprived necessitating large expenditures for public assistance and contributing to intergroup conflict?” Words of a eugenic mind cautious enough not to venture out too far into his real objective. The same caution is noticeable among other social scientists and eugenicists from the 1940s onward. Let’s not forget that Frederick Osborn (who was handpicked by John D. Rockefeller to be president of the Population Council) had said: “Eugenic goals are most likely to be attained under another name than eugenics.” So it was that the name “eugenics” never crept up. The names “demography”, and “human ecology” however did creep up, and were cleverly put in its place. “The Population Council’s “support of Bogue reflects a certain transition in the field of fertility research and planning from “family planning” towards a more pessimistic “population control.””, Ramsden writes. Indeed. In a 2002 publication by the Population Council titled Training and Support of Developing-Country Population Scientists, the authors write: “He (Bogue) encouraged articles on international demography and proposed that appropriate subject matter ranged from educational attainment to religious affiliation to ethnicity as long as it had a “demographic flavor.” He went further to suggest that the field of family planning research should be “co-opted” as a subfield of demography, asked that attention be paid to human ecology and community studies, and requested that the prejudice against social psychology in population studies be “softened”” What is meant by “pessimistic population control” in this regard, is nothing less than topdown indoctrination with the aid of mass media, or, what Bogue calls “mass communications” and “motivation campaigns”, designed to break the resistance of American families to the eugenic overlords. In order to do so, all disciplines of the scientific community should be brought together. Deliberately used them as guinea-pigs in an experiment executed by the Rockefellers and their Population Council, lowincome people and ethnic minorities were

subjected to the rule of social engineers working. We also learn from Ramsden’s excavations that the president of the Council, Notestein, personally reported the progress made in the Chicago-experiment back to Rockefeller. Ramsden writes: “Notestein wrote to John D. Rockefeller 3rd in September 1965: “We have given a good deal of thought to the ways in which one could attack the problem of reproduction in indigent and poorlyeducated populations without getting into the hornet’s nest of ethnic and color discrimination. This project will go to that problem — we think dramatically.” What Notestein meant by avoiding getting into “the hornet’s nest of ethnic and color discrimination” can be deduced from Mary Ziegler’s words when she wrote: “African-American volunteers were instructed to befriend people in the neighborhoods studied before advising them to stop having children.” In other words: blacks were used to target blacks. This strategy is reminiscent of the Nazi-policy in occupied Europe, to set up so-called “Jewish Councils”- which usually consisted of trusted individuals within the Jewish community- and were therefore trusted by the Nazis to assure victims were sufficiently obedient when they were loaded upon the trains to then be railed off to their deaths. Apparently the Chicago-experiments were soon expanded into other American cities. “The program again targeted hospitals that serviced the impoverished areas of Harlem, East Harlem, the lower Bronx, and in 1967 was expanded to include the Los Angeles County Hospital and the Wayne County General Hospital near Detroit.”, Ramsden writes. And it didn’t stop there. Bogue and his beneficiaries expanded the operations even further, this time projecting the findings gathered in the slums of Chicago to those in the Third World. Listing Bogue’s accomplishments, the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population lauds him for working extensively with students from the Third World in so-called “Workshops”: “Donald Bogue was also among the first to move such workshops to the countries or regions in which the participants worked to provide a more realistic environment for the training and opportunities for field visits. As part of this effort he held these workshops in Colombia, Mexico, Ecuador, Brazil, Ethiopia, Kenya, Sierra Leone,

Liberia, Ghana, Senegal, Lesotho, Gambia, and Tanzania.” And it appears Bogue was very optimistic about what he calls “the world wide movement to bring runaway birth rates under control”. Utah State University professor B. Delworth Gardner in a series of lectures on the subject of “population control” quotes Bogue as saying: “Recent developments in the world wide movement to bring runaway birth rates under control are such that it is now possible to assert with considerable confidence that the prospects for rapid fertility control are excellent.” And further on in the lecture: “The trend of the world-wide movement toward fertility control has already reached a state where declines in death rates are being surpassed by declines in birth rates. Because progress in death control is slackening and progress in birth control is accelerating, the world has already entered a situation where the pace of population growth has begun to slacken.” Some 40 years after Bogue did his experiments, a professor at MIT, ferociously writing on a chalkboard, echoed the old eugenic oath. Telling her students that as future scientists they need not worry about the population growth in developed countries, but focus all the more on reducing the populations in developing ones, she continued by saying: “(from 10 minutes, 10 seconds onward) The real trick is, in terms of trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which humans will level off on earth.” “As fast as we can”. This, at its core, is an admission of 21st century eugenics in action- and it is yet another example of the fact that eugenics has anything but died out. On the contrary: it has never been more alive.

Resolution Threatens Obama Impeachment  

If Obama works with the United Nations and NATO against Syria and does not seek authorization from Congress for the use of the U.S. military...