Rep. Mary Bono Freaks Out Both About ‘Gov’t Takeover’ And ‘Gov’t Handover’ Of The Internet Mike Masnick techdirt.com March 14, 2014
On Friday afternoon, we wrote about the basic non-story about how NTIA (a part of the Commerce Department) will be relinquishing what little “control” it had over ICANN’s IANA function. The US government already had little to no actual say over anything that ICANN was doing. The organization has been almost entirely independent from the beginning, and this move really just helps to clarify things, while actually taking some pressure off of ICANN so that other countries can’t whine and complain (incorrectly) that the internet is “under US control.” Still, with headlines everywhere screaming about how the US is “giving up control” over the internet, you had to know that it was going to become some sort of political issue. And, indeed, a bunch of politicians are up in arms about this, with the most vocal (by far) critic of this move being Rep. Mary Bono, who tweeted angrily on Friday about how we should all be concerned about this and how we need to “keep the internet!” Of course, since some of us have memories that go back more than a month or so, it’s not that difficult to remember Rep. Mary Bono was also one of the most vehement politicians against net neutrality. In fact, just three years ago, in launching an attack on net neutrality, this very same Rep. Mary Bono was screaming about stopping the “government takeover of the internet.” Sadly, that tweet is now deleted (gee… wonder why?). Still, we’re curious about all of this, and are hoping that Rep. Bono can answer this basic question. If we needed to “stop the government takeover of the internet” a few years ago… and yet, today, it’s an incredibly important job for the government to “keep the internet,” what, exactly, is Rep. Bono’s position on US government control over the internet? Or is it just whatever bogus talking point she can use to fire up constituents into believing the government is about to do something bad?
52% Think U.S. Economy Unfair To Those Willing To Work Hard rasmussenreports.com March 18, 2014
Most voters continue to think the economy is unfair to those who are willing to work hard. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 44% of Likely U.S. Voters say the U.S. economy is at least somewhat fair to people who are willing to work hard, up six points from October. Fifty-two percent (52%), though, do not think the economy is fair to those willing to work hard, although that's down from October’s high of 58%. This includes 14% who think the economy is Very Fair to hard workers and 17% who don’t think it’s Not At All Fair to them. (To see survey question wording, click here.) (Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook. The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on March 16-17, 2014 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.
Russia Sounds Alarm On Economy As West Starts With Sanctions Olga Tanas and Anna Andrianova bloomberg.com March 18, 2014
Russia’s economy is showing signs of a crisis, the government in Moscow said as the U.S. and the European Union announced sanctions over its plan to annex the Crimea region from Ukraine. “The situation in the economy bears clear signs of a crisis,” Deputy Economy Minister Sergei Belyakov said in Moscow yesterday. The cabinet needs to refrain from raising the fiscal burden on companies, which would be the “wrong approach,” he said. “Taking money from companies and asking them afterward to modernize production is illogical and strange.” Even before the standoff with the West, the worst since the Cold War, Russia’s economy was facing the weakest growth since a 2009 recession as consumer demand failed to make up for sagging investment. President Vladimir Putin signed a treaty today on Crimea joining Russia, signaling his defiance of Western sanctions. Russia won’t seek to further split Ukraine, he said in the Kremlin. The Ukrainian crisis is putting a strain on Russia’s $2 trillion economy, which expanded 1.3 percent in 2013 after 3.4 percent the previous year. Last year’s growth was “insufficient” and the current outlook and government forecasts “can’t satisfy us,” Putin said March 12.
Ruble Drops Russia will probably dip into a recession in the second and third quarters of this year as “domestic demand is set to halt on the uncertainty shock and tighter financial conditions,” Vladimir Kolychev and Daria Isakova, economists at Moscow-based VTB Capital, said in a research note yesterday. They cut their 2014 estimate to zero growth from 1.3 percent. The ruble has weakened about 9.6 percent against the dollar this year, more than any of the 175
currencies tracked by Bloomberg except the Argentine peso, the Kazakh tenge, the Ukrainian hryvnia, Zambia’s kwacha and Kyrgyzstan som. It traded at 36.3190 as of 6:10 p.m. in Moscow, strengthening from 36.4860 at 3 p.m., before Putin’s speech. EU foreign ministers yesterday agreed to freeze assets and impose visa travel bans on 21 Russian, Crimean and former Ukrainian officials, while U.S. President Barack Obama imposed sanctions on seven Russians. “Further provocations will achieve nothing, except to further isolate Russia and diminish its place in the world,” Obama said yesterday at the White House. The U.S. can “calibrate our response” based on whether Russia chooses “to escalate or to de-escalate the situation.”
Putin’s Message Crimea’s referendum, when the Black Sea peninsula voted March 16 to join Russia, was legal and in accordance with international laws, Putin said today. “Crimea is our historic legacy,” Putin told lawmakers, regional governors and government officials in Moscow. “It should be part of a strong and stable sovereignty, which today can only be Russian.” Addressing Ukrainians, Putin said: “Don’t believe those who scare you with Russia, who yell that Crimea will be followed by other regions. We don’t want to split up Ukraine, we don’t need that.” The region’s accession to Russia would cost “dozens of billions of rubles” annually, Labor Minister Maxim Topilin told Bloomberg before Putin’s address. A billion rubles is $27.6 million.
Crimea Cost The direct cost of annexing Crimea will be at least $3 billion for the Russian budget, according to Vladimir Osakovskiy, chief economist for Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States at Bank of America Corp. in Moscow. That amount includes $2 billion to replace funds from Ukraine’s budget and raise wages and pensions to the Russian level, as well as $1.5 billion to $2 billion for infrastructure upgrades, Osakovskiy said in an e-mailed response to questions. Russia already plans to spend at least 50 billion rubles ($1.4 billion) to build a bridge across the strait
of Kerch to connect the peninsula to its mainland, Transport Minister Maxim Sokolov told reporters March 5. The ruble’s slide, exacerbated by the intensifying tensions over Ukraine and the threat of sanctions, forced the central bank to look past sluggish growth and tighten monetary policy. Bank Rossii lifted its benchmark interest rate to 7 percent from 5.5 percent at an emergency meeting March 3. Policy makers held borrowing costs at their regular meeting on March 14 and said the benchmark rate wouldn’t be cut in the next several months.
Growth Outlook Consumer-price growth accelerated to 6.2 percent in February from a year earlier from 6.1 percent in January. Bank Rossii wants to keep inflation within 5 percent this year after missing its target range of 5 percent to 6 percent in 2013. While Putin at a March 12 meeting with senior officials in Sochi called the economy “stable,” a range of economists cut forecasts for this year. Morgan Stanley (MS) economists Jacob Nell and Alina Slyusarchuk lowered their estimate for 2014 growth to 0.8 percent from 2.5 percent, according to a note to clients yesterday. “We see Russia close to recession in the first half of 2014 as a result of the Ukrainian security crisis driving higher rates and risk premia, leading to weaker consumption and contracting investment,” they wrote. Monetary tightening will make borrowing more expensive and difficult for businesses and consumers, possibly leading to recession this year, Vladimir Miklashevsky, an economist at Danske Bank A/S (DANSKE) in Helsinki, wrote in a note clients. Even a forecast of 1 percent growth this year is optimistic given the geopolitical environment, he said, cutting his estimate to that level from 2.6 percent on March 14.
Capital Outflow Capital outflow from Russia may reach $70 billion in the first quarter and there is “a real risk that this could push Russia into recession,” London-based Capital Economics said in a report published yesterday. The sum may have reached $35 billion in January and February, Russian Economy Minister Alexei Ulyukayev told reporters today in Moscow. That’s more than half of the $63 billion for all of 2013. One way of helping accelerate growth would be to lower costs for companies, Belyakov said yesterday. The total tax burden in the economy slightly fell to 33.3 percent of gross domestic product last year, Deputy Finance Minister Sergei Shatalov said at the same conference. “From the business point of view, the fiscal burden, I think, is extremely high today for both the economy and companies,” Belyakov said.
INFOWARS.COM BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
Published on Mar 19, 2014
On Friday afternoon, we wrote about the basic non-story about how NTIA (a part of the Commerce Department) will be relinquishing what little...