Mapping the Interrelation of public / common / private goods.
Thinking of commoning as a practice of making the cities spaces accessable, can be questioned related to public space. Adapting the practice of commoning on public spaces, revealed various struggles, the most striking one is the relation to privatization within the context of appropriating or enclosing an object for a specific, limited amount of people. Acoording to that, commoning would lead to collective privatization, and as a result create a rivalrous character - something that is not evitable in a limited world. This brings up questions of groups feeling responsible for a certain area, defining inside and outside, additio-
nally the parallels of commoning with private property rights makes it difficult to advise a solely common management of public space. Questions of access and rivalrous use remain. But, although this alleged clash between the on the one hand non-excludable and on the other hand rivalrous character, which common goods inherit - there is a difference that can be made concerning the management of accessability, and therefor publicness and openness.