Page 1

Get Knowledge about Group Discussion

We have drawn contributions from a broad range of perspectives. The literature relevant to an understanding of group creativity has evolved along a number of different lines in different areas of study and disciplines. Researchers come from the diverse traditions of cognition, Group Discussion, creativity, information systems, and organizational psychology. Creativity and cognitive researchers have examined the role of social and cognitive influences on the creative process. Organizational researchers have examined team innovation, organizational learning, and knowledge transfer. Group researchers have studied Group Discussion brainstorming, and information systems scholars have examined brainstorming by means of computers. Other group scholars have examined the role of minority influence on creativity and information exchange in Group Discussion. These areas have developed largely in isolation and with little integration of the various findings and concepts. In addition, the scholars working on this topic have taken rather distinct methodological and theoretical approaches. Much of the research on Group Discussion and cognitive creativity is done in laboratory settings and focuses on detailed analyses of social and cognitive processes in the short term. Creativity researchers often examine the broader context of creative achievement, such as careers of highly creative people or several years of work in research teams. Researchers in organizational settings have examined innovative activities in Group Discussion and teams and their impact on organizational learning and innovation. Information systems scholars have examined idea exchange and decision processes using computer networks. It is hoped that by bringing together the contributions from these different fields we will facilitate integration of the various findings and theoretical models into a general framework of group creativity. The first section highlights the various processes that can inhibit or facilitate creativity in Group Discussion. Some of these processes are primarily cognitive in that they deal with the processing of information. Others are more social in nature, reflecting the influence of about group discussion members on motivation level, capability, and normative behavior. For diversity to have positive effects on creativity it is necessary that About Group Discussion members share their diverse perspectives. Ironically, members tend to focus on ideas or knowledge that they have in common rather than unique information. This, of course, greatly limits the potential benefits of cognitive diversity in Group Discussion. Stassen and Birch Meier discuss the basis for this bias toward shared information and ways that it can be overcome. The lack of attention to group factors in the creativity field is consistent with much evidence in the literature that Group Discussion may inhibit intellectual activity or optimal performance. Group Discussion may feel pressure to achieve premature consensus, leading to suboptimal and noncreative solutions. Group contexts can lower accountability and individual motivation to perform at a high level

Get knowledge about group discussion  

The best online resource to keep you inform about group discussion and related issues. Join us Today. We keep you updated about group discus...

Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you