Structural Systems of the Million Program Era

Page 11

of the area (i.e. monotony, drabness, concrete facades, poor

The original drawings, models and intentions are quickly

landscaping, etc) and very few have looked at improving the

fading into history for a number of reasons: the smaller

apartment layouts or size distribution in relation to chang-

contractors were bought up by larger conglomerates, the

ing demographics.

people involved are retired or passed away, the negative reputation the Million Program Era has stigmatized the val-

Through a series of elective seminar courses at the KTH

ue of the material, and so on. As half of the students were

School of Architecture, we have been able to address these

Erasmus exchange students, we paired them with a Swed-

issues from a different perspective. We have been focusing

ish speaking student and assigned them a couple of areas

on the structural systems of multifamily housing from the

to investigate. This compilation of material on twenty five

Million Program Era in order to fill a knowledge gap regard-

of the Million Program Era areas is thus a first step in clos-

ing their potential for change. If and how they can be altered

ing the knowledge gap that exists. We have, since this first

to fit contemporary society rests on how well we can un-

inventory, continued the research by selecting twelve of the

derstand their original structural intentions and the chang-

areas for closer study and built both 1:20 scale physical and

ing needs of today’s residents. This inside-out method runs

digital models of six of these structural systems. These six

counter to many projects occurring around Sweden where

wooden models were then the basis for a series of propos-

problems are to be solved from the outside-in, rerely af-

als of how these specific buildings could be altered by work-

fecting the apartment. Our goal has been to understand

ing with knowledge of their structural systems. These stud-

some of the inherent differences in the buildings that make

ies will be presented in future publications and exhibits.

• Umeå

Ålidhem 74

• Sundsvall Nacksta 86

Grindtorp (Täby) Bogsätravägen (Skärholmen) Larsberg (Lidingö) Sätra Torg (Skärholmen) Västra Orminge (Nacka) Axelsberg (Hägersten) Henriksdalsberget (Nacka) Tensta (Spånga) Alby (Botkyrka) Jordbro (Haninge) Kungshamra (Solna) Näsbydal (Täby) Byälvsvägen (Bagarmossen) Hjulsta (Spånga) Fisksätra (Nacka) Brandbergen (Haninge)

up a quarter of Sweden’s housing stock. We have, for example, re-discovered that there were at least sixteen dif-

A special thanks to students Sareh Sayidi and Sheng Sun

ferent prefabricated structural systems in use in Sweden in

who helped compile the material for the publication and to

1968. Each one of these systems can be altered in an indi-

editors Staffan Lundgren and Kristina Knauff who in the end

vidual manner even though the apartments they contain are

made the publication possible together with a generous do-

remarkably similar. We have also found out that Tensta’s

nation from the Origo (formerly Höjer & Ljungqvist) Foun-

5600 apartments were built by twenty two different contrac-

dation. Thanks are also due to all helpful people involved

tors. Given this diversity of builders in just one of the many

in locating original material from the Million Program Era.

Karlstad•

• Stockholm • Södertälje

Orrholmen 30

Million Program Era areas and the numerous prefabricated

Hovsjö 106

• Norrköping

structural systems in use at the time, we aspire to uncover

Erik Stenberg

differences between buildings, differences between areas

Teacher and Head of Department

within Sweden, and promote the rediscovery of the struc-

KTH School of Architecture

Navestad 62

Göteborg•

Brogården (Alingsås) 102

tural potential of the Million Program Era housing areas. A great many thanks are due to all the masters level stu-

• JÖnköping Råslätt 70

• Växjö

dents who have invested their time into this seminar course.

Araby 38

They have been busy contacting municipal and private housing companies, searching obscure archives, calling reMalmö•

tired builders, and following weak trails in search of draw-

Rosengård 90

ings and photographs of the areas that we have selected. 9

10 14 18 22 27 34 42 46 50 54 58 66 78 82 94 98


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Structural Systems of the Million Program Era by KTH Arkitekturskolan - Issuu