Gender-disaggregated analysis of adoption of agricultural water management technologies in Kenya

Page 40

Crop 1 (

)

Crop 2 (

)

Crop 3 (

)

Crop 4 (

)

Value of the Manure (Estimate per AC) Fertilizer Type (see codes) Fertilizer Quantity Applied Amount Invested (Estimate per ac) No. of Hired Labour (Men) Operations for Which Hired Labour Was Used (Men) Area Covered (ac) (Men) Labor Rate (kSh/day) (Men) No. of Hired Labour (Women) Operations for Which Hired Labour Was Used (Women) Area covered (ac) (Women) Labor rate (kSh/day) (Women)

Problems faced in this season? (specify)

1. ________________ 2. ________________ 3. ________________ 4. ________________ 5.

1. ________________ 2. ________________ 3. ________________ 4. ________________ 5.

1. ________________ 2. ________________ 3. ________________ 4. ________________ 5.

1. ________________ 2. ________________ 3. ________________ 4. ________________ 5.

1. ________________ 2. ________________ 3. ________________ 4. ________________ 5.

1. ________________ 2. ________________ 3. ________________ 4. ________________ 5.

1. ________________ 2. ________________ 3. ________________ 4. ________________ 5.

1. ________________ 2. ________________ 3. ________________ 4. ________________ 5.

Current Status of Crop (see codes)

If Poor, Why?

Water Conservation Practices: 1 = Tied Ridges; 2 = Terraces; 3 = Conservation Farming; 4 = Mulching; 5 = Irrigation Seed Source: 1 = Own; 2 = Neighbour; 3 = Agrovet; 4 = Other (Specify) Manure type: 1 = Cattle Manure; 2 = Poultry Manure; 3 = Compost; 4 = Other (Specify) Fertilizer type: 1 = CAN; 2 = Urea; 3 = DAP; 4 = Complex 28:28; 5 = Other (Specify) Crop Status: 1 = Good, 2 = Average, 3 = Poor

40


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.