Bradford Baugh From:
Bradford Baugh <baughlaw@ix.netcom.com>
Sent:
Sunday, May 14, 2017 3:00 PM
To:
'PAUL NESSE'; 'jm@jmphd.com'
Cc: Subject:
'Nancy Olesen'; 'MICHAEL KERNER'; Ted Moorhead; 'Judith Lewis-Thome'
RE:
Moorhead
�
�_9__,l_��!.�U !;.�!_goingJQ.H�(f!liill..M��e t� provi e d:�cm12�1ta1y pr�)of t.he requirem 'n�s in tlw nn.l�r have been met. If Mr N esse doesn t wami1: "";-+!�at1nrp rob ll'n. I don t thmk any of us Wlll see Mr N esse fillrn1ftffi:g-he·..i1-1adc+-a--tnistak.e i.1.u . J.HHif:et-i ...
From: PAUL NESSE [JJJglll;Q.J?ill,j]_@QaU!SD..§JiS\.,£Orn] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 9:22 PM To: jrrl@jmphd.com; Bradford Baugh
Cc: 'Nancy Olesen'; 'MICHAEL KERNER'; loririqqig4@9.mail.corn;
Subject:
Re: Moorhead
'Judith Lewis-Thome'; dm@jmphd. corn
Apparently Mr. Baugh still wants to rewrite the order he prepared. Shouldn't we focus on the task at hand instead of listening to an attempt to rewrite the order? Paul
From: Bradford Baugh
<baughlaw@i .netcoiu,com> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 4:58:34 PM To: PAUL NESSE; jm@jmphd.com
Cc: 'Judith Lewis-Thome'; 'MICHAEL KERNER'; dm@jmphd.com; 'Nancy Olesen'; Ted Moorhead
Subject:
RE: Moorhead
The quote I gave earlier is right out of the order. Mr Nesse may wish to pause and think. Without a report from you that both parties and both children have both participated and successfully completed your program, his client cannot move. Let's see if Mr Nesse rethinks his position. From: PAUL NESSE
[mailto:.Qaul(O)p 1J�.l§�e.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 5:13 PM To: jm@imphd.com
Cc: BRAD BAUGH; Judith Lewis-Thome (j�!JQJ.1]£!.@p�rnnting;;.Q.\1,Jj;jQJJ5.il?.,GPm); MICHAEL KERNER; dm@jmphd.com; Nancy Olesen; lorlrtqgio2@gmail.com; Kelly Stratico
Subject: Moorhead Dear Dr. Moran
I have review�d Mr. Baugh's letter to you dated May 8, 2017. Unfortunately,· Mr. -Baugh is·attempting to redraft the Order wh i c h he himself prepared by a d d i n g a requirement of reporting to the ·court. This was
covered rather extensively in our recent tel e p ho ne discussion and it was agreed that t h e re is no such requirement set forth in the court order. For your review,
I attach another
14, 2017 and respectfully direct your attention to paragraph Bon page
copy of the Order filed February
3. Also, nothing was underlined in that
paragraph so Mr. Baugh's attempt to emphasize items are just his opinions. 1