Issuu on Google+

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Case:_________________ 815-11 SCA & 07-2010 EQ JHB In the matter between: ALIEN ON PALE BLUE DOT

Applicant

And AFRIFORUM

First Respondent

TRANSVAAL AGRICULTURAL UNION (TAU)

Second Respondent

JULIUS MALEMA

Third Respondent

AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS

Fourth Respondent

DESMOND TUTU

Fifth Respondent

NELSON MANDELA

Sixth Respondent

FW DE KLERK

Seventh Respondent

CRL RIGHTS COMMISSION1

Eighth Respondent

NORWEGIAN NOBEL COMMITTEE: CHAIR

Ninth Respondent

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY: DIRECTOR

Tenth Respondent

DAVID PETRAEUS

Eleventh Respondent

FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT

I the undersigned, LARA JOHNSTONE do hereby make oath and say:

1

Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities 1


[1]

I am an adult Radical Honoursty Ecofeminist Wild Law Sustainable Security

practicing paralegal (subsequently referred to as ―applicant‖), member of Friend of Wikileaks (FoWL) and the Radical Honesty culture2; resident in George, Southern Cape, RSA; where I run a small EcoFeminist pedal-powered wormery business. [2]

Sustainable Security Wild Law3 regulates human procreation and/or resource

utilization behaviour, to ensure sustainability4. A Sustainable society practices Sustainable Procreation and Natural Resource Utilization Behaviour5. Laws of Nature determine that Environmental or ecological rights and responsibilities are the sine qua non6 foundation for all other Rights7. Sustainable Security: ―There is no security without sustainability‗8: In the absence of a new moral order9 where Wild Laws are implemented to regulate and reduce human procreation and resource utilization behaviour, towards a sustainable, pre- industrial lifestyle paradigm; ―overpopulation10 and resource scarcity11 will result in conflict and war12 (perhaps

SA Constitutional Court ruling of 03 May 2012 in CCT 23-10, reads as follows: ―Ms. Lara Johnstone, Member of Radical Honesty Culture and Religion, is admitted as an amicus curiae‖ 3 Wild Law is a new legal theory and growing social movement. It proposes that we rethink our legal, political, economic and governance systems so that they support, rather than undermine, the integrity and health of the Earth. www.wildlaw.org.au 4 Sustainability requires living within the regenerative capacity of the biosphere. The human economy depends on the planet‘s natural capital, which provides all ecological services and natural resources. Drawing on natural capital beyond its regenerative capacity results in depletion of the capital stock. 5 Bartlett (1994/09): Reflections on Sustainability, Population Growth, and the Environment, Population & Environment, Vol. 16, No. 1, Sep 1994, pp. 5-35; Clugston, C (2009): Sustainability Defined (WakeUpAmerika) 6 Opinion of Weeramantry J in the Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia) (1998) 37 International Legal Materials 162 206. 7 Bartlett (2000/09): Democracy Cannot Survive Overpopulation, Population & Environment, Vol. 22, No. 1, pgs. 63-71 8 Murphy, R (2006/10/24): US Army Strategy of the Environment, Office of the Dep. Asst. Sec. of the Army, Environment, Safety & Occup. Health: Assistant for Sustainability; Linkola, P (2009): Can Life Prevail? A Radical Approach to the Environmental Crisis (Integral Tradition Publishing) 9 Hardin, G (1968/12/13): Tragedy of the Commons, Science; Peters, R (1996): The Culture of Future Conflict, US Army War College: Parameters: Winter 1995-96, pp. 18-27. 10 Hardin G (1991): Carrying Capacity and Quality of Life, Environmental Science: Sustaining the Earth 11 Koppel, T (2000): CIA and Pentagon on Overpopulation and Resource Wars, Nightline; United States Joint Forces Command (2010/02/18): The Joint Operating Environment - 2010 (The JOE – 2010); United States Army & TRADOC (2012): US Army Unified Quest 2012 Fact Sheet, Unified Quest 2012 is the Army Chief of Staff's annual Title 10 Future Study Plan (FSP); Peters, R (1996); ; Parthemore, C & Nagl, J (2010/09/27): Fueling the Future Force: Preparing the Department of Defense for a Post-Petroleum Environment, Center for a New American Security (CNAS) 12 Peters (1996); Bush, GW Snr (1986/02): Public Report of the Vice-President‘s Task Force on Combatting Terrorism; Homer-Dixon, T, & Boutwell, J, & Rathjens, G (1993): Environmental change and violent conflict: Growing scarcities of renewable resources can contribute to social instability and civil strife. Scientific American, 268(2), pp. 38-45. 2

2


nuclear13) confronting regions at an accelerated pace‘14, and ―collapse of the global economic system and every market-oriented national economy‖15 by 205016. [3]

The facts set out herein fall within the Applicants personal knowledge, unless

otherwise indicated by the context, and are to the best of my belief true and correct. THE ALIEN ON PALE BLUE DOT APPLICANT: [4]

Applicant‘s reference to herself as Alien on Pale Blue Dot refers to: 1. ALIEN: Hardin (1980): Religious historian, Ernest Renan invented the ―Man from Mars‖, that ―thoroughly rational, inquisitive being, who asks earthlings to explain what they do in terms that can be understood by an intelligence completely free of all traditional terrestrial beliefs, assumptions, and prejudices.‖ 2. PALE BLUE DOT: Sagan C: Pale Blue Dot: ―Consider again that dot .. home where everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives.., every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there - on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam. The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by generals and emperors so that, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Our posturing, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light….. The significance of our lives and our fragile planet is determined only by our own wisdom and courage. We are the custodians of life's meaning… knowledge is preferable to ignorance. Better to embrace hard truth than a reassuring fable. If we crave some cosmic purpose, then let us find ourselves a worthy goal…. Once we overcome our fear of being tiny, we find ourselves on the threshold of a vast Universe that utterly dwarfs — in time, space, and potential — the tidy anthropocentric proscenium of our ancestors.

Hardin (1968/12/13) United States Army & TRADOC (2012) 15 Schultz, S (2010/09/01): [German] Military Study Warns of Potentially Drastic Oil Crisis, Der Spiegel 16 Clugston, C (2012): Scarcity: Humanity‘s Final Chapter (Booklocker.com Inc): Preface, pg. ix 13 14

3


[5]

Descartian vs. Radical Honesty Thinking: In cultures who have adopted

western ‗I‘ conceptual thinking, based upon Descartes ―I think, therefore I am‖ principles, they consider their ‗thoughts‘ to be ‗I‘. Any thought that enters their consciousness, they think ‗I think/thought .. .. ‘. [6]

Radical Honesty Thinking is based upon Eastern ‗observation of the mind‘

principle‘s, which consider the being to be ‗I‘, not the mind: ‗I am, therefore I think‘. Hence our sensate being: legs, bodies, sensations (sweaty palms, aches, tight chest, etc) are ‗I‘ (our identity), whereas the thoughts that pass through our consciousness are not ‗I‘. We notice the thoughts entering into our consciousness, in the same way, you may listen to a radio discussion or debate, where different, frequently contradictory ideas are expressed. You listen, and don‘t think ‗I think that‘ simply because the thought entered your consciousness. They are just sounds, that are converted into thoughts by your conscious mind; you can agree, disagree, but they are not ‗I‘. [7]

Ideas are simply ideas, not personal identity. Our being is our identity, and

ideas, including ideology, are only useful, in terms of their practical ability to solve any particular problem. An Alien/Radical Honesty Mind can easily apply communist, capitalist, cannibal ideology, from their Ideology toolbox to fix any particular social problem, without any identity attachment to the particular ideology as ‗I‘.

A

Descartian – who lacks a ‗don‘t know‘ mind - considers ideology to be her/his identity; insisting that all problems, need to be fixed by applying their ideology. An Alien mind uses a hammer for a nail, and a screwdriver for a screw; whereas for example a Right wing Descartian believes every problem to be a nail and a Left Wing Descartian believes every problem to be a screw. [8]

As Susan Blackmore explains in her article about how Memeplexes hijack our

minds, by acting no different to Selfish Genes17, in Waking from the Meme Dream18: ―The most obvious (and scary) conclusion from modern neuroscience is that there is simply no one inside the brain. The more we learn about the way the brain functions the less it seems to need a central controller, a little person inside, a decider of decisions or an experiencer of experiences. These are just fictions - part of

17 18

Dawkins,R. (1976) The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press. Blackmore, Susan (1996/11/10) 4


the story the brain tells itself about a self within (Churchland and Sejnowski, 1992 19; Dennett, 199120).‖ THE PARTIES: [9]

Afriforum and Transvaal Agricultural Union were the Plaintiffs in the

original application to the Equality Court (South Gauteng High Court) of Judge Colin Lamont; and the Respondents in the matter to the Supreme Court of Appeal. [10]

Julius Malema and the African National Congress were the respondents

in the original Equality Court application, who appealed the ruling of Judge Colin Lamont to the Supreme Court of Appeal. [11]

Desmond Tutu was appointed Chairman of the Truth and Reconciliation

Commission (TRC) by Nelson Mandela. The TRC was set up in terms of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, No. 34 of 1995, and was based in Cape Town. Other members of the TRC (none of whom represented the former Apartheid regime) were Dr. Alex Boraine (Deputy Chairman), Mary Burton, Advocate Chris de Jager, Bongani Finca, Pumla Gobodo-Madikizela, Sisi Khampepe, Richard Lyster, Wynand Malan, Reverend Khoza Mgojo, Hlengiwe Mkhize, Dumisa Ntsebeza (head of the Investigative Unit), Dr. Wendy Orr, Advocate Denzil Potgieter, Mapule Ramashala, Dr. Fazel Randera, Yasmin Sooka and Glenda Wildschut. [12]

Archbishop Tutu‘s theology falls under, or is related to Kairos doctrine, as

enunciated in the 1985 Kairos document; which is founded on liberation theology. According to James. H. Cone and others, black liberation theology was the theological arm of black power seeking to relate the black struggle for freedom to the biblical claim regarding the justice of God. Black power itself was the political challenge to the non-violence preached by Martin Luther King. Decision making in favour of violence, was provided for within the tenets of black liberation theology. [13]

Black Liberation Theology believes that whites can only be forgiven once they

have given up their belief in their whiteness and whiteness cultural values of merit, small family procreation values, property rights, etc; and helped to violently overthrow whiteness to establish a Marxist Leninist communist utopia. 19 20

Churchland,P.S. and Sejnowski,T.J. (1992) The Computational Brain. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press Dennett,D.C. (1991) Consciousness Explained. London, Little, Brown & Co. 5


[14]

In Complaints to Public Protector of TRC Handling of SADF21, and Assessment

of the Probable Results of Activities of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) as Perceived by Former Chiefs of the SADF IRO the SADF22, submitted by Gen. J.J. Geldenhuys, SSA, SD, SOE, SM; Genl A.J. Liebenberg, SSA, SD, SOE, MMM; Genl M.A. de M. Malan, SSA, OMSG, SD, SM; and Gen C.L. Viljoen, SSA, SD, SOE, SM; respectively to the Public Protector and TRC; the Generals have numerous complaints about the bias from the ANC-TRC, on numerous issues, that the TRC methodology for finding the truth was pre-judgemental and biased, refusing to consider perspectives that contradicted those of the ANC-TRC, that it appeared to be deliberately and intentionally biased, by selectively searching for the truth, and acting with a ―political vendetta‖ towards the SADF, and that its lack of impartial enquiry into the truth about different parties motives, actions and justifications in the past were seriously prejudicing the overall aim of the TRC to allegedly pursue and promote Reconciliation and National Unity. [15]

The composite of the complaint reads: ―The TRC and some of its members

have displayed continuous prejudice, bias and lack of impartiality towards the former South African Defence Force and its members. .. The disregard which resultantly developed in the minds of members of the former SADF undermines the overall mission of the TRC to promote reconciliation and national unity.‖ [16]

The Generals proceed to refer to Dr. Boraine and the TRC‗s ideological

perspective founded on among others Black Liberation Theology23; whereby the whole of society is comprised into only two categories: Oppressors and Oppressed, ―oppressed and oppressors together, were imprisoned by the chains with which one group sought to bind the other for many generations.‖

21

Complaints to Public Protector of TRC Handling of SADF, submitted by Generals J.J. Geldenhuys, SSA, SD, SOE, SM; A.J. Liebenberg, SSA, SD, SOE, MMM; M.A. de M. Malan, SSA, OMSG, SD, SM; and C.L. Viljoen, SSA, SD, SOE, SM; January 1998 22 Assessment of the Probable Results of Activities of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) as Perceived by Former Chiefs of the SADF IRO the SADF, submitted to the Chairman of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, by Generals J.J. Geldenhuys, SSA, SD, SOE, SM; A.J. Liebenberg, SSA, SD, SOE, MMM; M.A. de M. Malan, SSA, OMSG, SD, SM; and C.L. Viljoen, SSA, SD, SOE, SM; February 1998 23 (I) South African Christianity: The Kairos Document, 25 September 1985; A Challenge to the Church, allegedly by Frank Chicane and Beyers Naude; (ii) Violence: The New Kairos: Challenge to the Churches, 1990, An Institute for Contextual Theology Publication; and (iii) Theologies: Liberation vs. Submission, by Jean-Pierre Cloutier (Initially published in the Spring of 1987 in the Haiti Times) 6


Although we stand sympathetic towards the objectives of the TRC….. we have serious reservations as to whether the TRC can make an optimum contribution towards reconciliation and national unity. Our reservations are shared, amongst others, by the historian Hermann Giliomee in the Leader Page article in the Cape Times of 9 October 1997. ―Writing as a historian, I have always felt that the greatest problem with the commission was not so much what it has set out to do, but its hopelessly skewed composition. Unlike Chile, where half the commissioners appointed to a similar body was roughly associated with the old regime and the other half with the new, the score in our case is roughly nine to one in favour of the anti - regime side‖. The entire focus of this ―Oppressor vs Oppressed‖ Black Liberation Theology argument was one side is ―right‖ and the other ―wrong‖; the aim was not a commitment to a conversation to attempt to understand and sincerely forgive, but to prove to the other side, ―We are right‖: ―The struggle became the new measure for determining the nature of violence, for right and wrong. In the name of the struggle, throwing stones, burning cars and killing people were somehow less horrible, more humane, perhaps even more in line with human rights. The question arises as to whether Dr Boraine and the TRC can really expect to build a future South African society with this kind of intellectual gymnastics? The danger lies in their conceptual application of an untruth. In the case of South Africa if this supposition of the TRC is accepted, an analysis of the past becomes irrelevant. If society is perceived as an interaction between oppressor and oppressed, as a clear cut distinction between evil and good, the TRC's investigation is not really necessary even before the start of the hearings. The outcome would have been predetermined. The TRC has omitted to recognise, admit to or even investigate another reality which existed at the time. A reality created by the perceptions of people. [..] Questions that beg to be answered by the TRC process are the following: What were the intentions of the Soviet Union with regard to southern and more particularly South Africa at the time they decided to actually assist, train, fund and arm the SA Communist Party / ANC in their attempt to overthrow the then SA Government by violent revolution? What did the Soviet Union wish to achieve? What was the quid pro quo demanded from the SACP/ANC in exchange for such massive support? Does the TRC know that Castro favoured violence and terrorism over politics in his approach to revolution and that the Cubans have been the principal instigators of armed conflict in Africa since 1960? The TRC has not looked to the intelligence and security services of the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Germany in order to provide the proper perspective. (Op. cit. p.7).

7


[17]

If the Archbishop Tutu and the TRC did honestly reveal their Black

Liberation Theology violent Marxist ―reconcilication‖ doctrine definitions; it would result in Conservative, particularly Calvinist Christians being fully aware that ―forgiveness‖ and ―reconciliation‖ do not mean the same things to Boer/Afrikaners as they do to ANC Black Liberation theology Marxists. Because they are opposing ideas about ―reconciliation‖, Calvinist ―reconciliation‖ is as impossible as Marxist ―reconciliation‖. The TRC Political and Religious elite have exploited the African and European masses by avoiding clarifying these huge differences in meaning between the two camps, so as to benefit from the masses ignorance, and confusion, and scapegoat the Calvinist Christian community, whose ―reconciliation‖ perspectives are an impediment to ANC‗s Black Liberation Theology ―reconciliation‖ aims to overthrow ―whiteness‖ and establish their communist utopia. [18]

Succinctly, Archbishop Tutu‘s ‗Crime of Apartheid‘ TRC Commissioners lacked

cultural equivalent code of military honour24 or philosophical courage25, to impartially enquire into demographic motives of Apartheid; unable to ―accept that, irrespective of the methods used, both sides performed their duties bona fide, in what they perceived to be service to their respective political masters,‖ 26 that ―no single side in the conflict of the past has a monopoly of virtue or should bear responsibility for all the abuses that occurred‖27. [19]

Archbishop Tutu failed to follow his own advice and criticism he gave to the

Apartheid regime, stating that Apartheids vague legal definitions amounted to Legal

Rain Liivoja. 2010. Chivalry without a Horse: Military Honour & Modern Law of Armed Conflict The Role of Philosophical Courage in Philosophical Counseling, by Hakam Al-Shawi: ―I ..l suggest that this transformational process requires at least one necessary ingredient without which philosophical counseling would not be possible. Whether implicitly or explicitly, both counselor and client need the virtue of courage in its form as ―philosophical courage‖ in order for the counseling to be successful. Moreover, the degree of such courage in both client and counselor will determine the extent to which issues are brought into question…… there is another form of courage—philosophical courage—required of individuals in dealing with their most fundamental beliefs and values. ….. I believe the best way to demarcate roughly the different forms of courage, is through an analysis of the cost involved with each form of the virtue…. First, with physical courage, the possible cost involved, at the extreme, is the physical loss of life…. Second, with moral courage, the possible cost is social rejection and isolation and/or a loss of ―ethical integrity or authenticity. Third, with ―psychological courage,‖ the possible cost perceived by the individual is ―psychic death.‖ …. And fourth, with ―philosophical courage‖ the possible cost is philosophical instability where one‘s most fundamental beliefs and values are brought into doubt. … it demands of the individual a confrontation with fundamental beliefs and values‖ [www.scribd.com/doc/34457982] 26 Submission to the TRC, by General M.A. de Malan [ www.scribd.com/doc/34462172] 27 Submission to the TRC by Mr. F.W de Klerk, National Party [ www.scribd.com/doc/34462184] 24 25

8


Tyranny.28 If Apartheid provided vague definitions, and Mandela and Tutu‘s TRC Social contract provide no legal definitions for the concept of ‗reconciliation‘; does that mean Tutu and Mandela‘s South Africa is a greater tyranny than Apartheid? [20]

Nelson Mandela is the former president of South Africa from 1994 to 1999,

who appointed Archbishop Desmond Tutu to be the Chairman of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, subsequent to negotiations with Former President FW de Klerk. [21]

Nelson Mandela was the co-founder of Umkhonto we Sizwe, the armed wing of

the African National Congress (ANC), who either (a) did not believe that Africans and Boers were culturally similar in terms of their capacity for similar cultural breeding values, since he did not believe that Africans were capable of amending their procreation behaviour from an r-selected reproductive strategy (large number of offspring with minimal investments in offspring); to the Boers K-selected reproductive strategy (a small number of offspring and invest heavily in each; or (b) if he did believe Africans were capable of adopting the Boer K-selected reproductive strategy, he was not culturally honourably concerned with Just War practices; since he declined to launch a non-violent cultural and political campaign to stop the African ‗swart gevaar‗ breeding-war population explosion, to adopt the Boers Kselected reproductive strategy; to thereby demonstrate to Boers, his honourable Just War Just Cause Intentions to Apartheid Officials and citizens; prior to Mandela‘s MPlan declaration of War against Apartheid. [22]

Mandela‘s military attempts to overthrow the Apartheid government resulted

in his arrest on charges of treason in 1962. He was convicted of sabotage and other charges, and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Prosecutor showed that Mandela‘s militant actions against Apartheid consisted of among others his planning and implementation of ―campaigns of sabotage, intimidation, torture, guerrilla warfare, violence, disruption of transportation and communications, insurrection and revolution against the government‖. The treason plotters ―planned to manufacture or purchase explosives such as 48,000 land mines each containing 5 pounds of dynamite, 210,000 hand grenades each containing 1/4 pd of dynamite as well as Truth and Reconciliation Report: Vol I. page 30; para 26; 27 ; page 32 para 32; page 38, para 59; Vol II; page 274, para 453 28

9


petrol bombs, syringe bombs, thermite bombs, 1,500 timing devices for bombs, as well as molotov cocktails‖. [23]

Their planning ―requirements included 144 tons of ammonium nitrate,21.6

tons of aluminum powder and 15 tons of black powder, as they ―prepared for a nucleus army of 7,000 soldiers,‖ most to ―be trained abroad in Communist countries‖. The campaign was based on the model of successes previously achieved in Algeria and Cuba. More than ten documents written in Nelson Mandella's handwriting were submitted as evidence. They contained notes on basic and advanced military training and warfare as well as Communist doctrine. Although Mandella denied being a Communist he admitted that the aims and objectives of the ANC and Communist Party were identical. He even spoke of retaliation against non supportive blacks such as murder and cutting off their noses. [24]

The Rand Daily Mail, the most outspoken liberal newspaper at the time in

South Africa, and in many ways a supporter of Mandela and the ANC, wrote about the sentences passed by the judge, ―The sentences pronounced by Judge De Wet at the close of the Rivonia trial are both wise and just. The law is best served when there is firmness tinged with mercy, and this was the case yesterday. The sentences could not have been less severe than those imposed. The men found guilty had planned sabotage on a wide scale and had conspired for armed revolution. As the judge pointed out yesterday, the crime of which they were found guilty was really high treason. The death penalty would have been justified.‖ [25]

Mandela was released from prison on 11 February 1990, on the orders of

President F.W. de Klerk. [26]

Following the 7 September 1992 Bisho massacre, on September 8, at the

memorial service for the 28 massacred protesters, Nelson Mandela and the freedom fighters are recorded on video singing a song in Xhosa whose lyrics include: "Go safely Mkhonto, Mkhonto we Sizwe, we the members of the MK have pledged ourselves to kill them, the amaBhulu (Boers)29"30

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKiePbTcAfY Independent Newspapers Online (2007-07-24). "'We have pledged ourselves to kill whites' - South Africa | IOL News". IOL.co.za. Retrieved 2012-10-27. 29 30

10


[27]

Mandela‘s 10 December 1993, Nobel Laureate acceptance speech31 made direct

reference to ‗Wretched of the Earth‘, Frantz Fanon's Famous Handbook for Black Liberation by Cleansing Violent Revolution on the rotting corpses of the settlers: ―Moved by that appeal and inspired by the eminence you have thrust upon us, we undertake that we too will do what we can to contribute to the renewal of our world so that none should, in future, be described as the ―wretched of the earth‖.‖ [28]

FW de Klerk was the last Apartheid President of South Africa. He lifted the

ban on the African National Congress (ANC) and released Nelson Mandela. He brought apartheid to an end and opened the way for the drafting of a new constitution for the country based on the principle of one person, one vote. [29]

In 1992 de Klerk called a referendum for a mandate to negotiate with the

African National Congress. The referendum question was ‗negotiation‘ not ‗surrender‘. De Klerk promised that if he was given a mandate for negotiation, a second referendum would be held, upon completion of the negotiations. A majority of 68.73% of the voters granted De Klerk a mandate to negotiate. Negotiate, not surrender. [30]

During the negotiations with the ANC, a proposal was also placed before De

Klerk and the ANC to turn South Africa into a federal state similar to the Swiss canton-system: i.e. one language and one culture per canton. This successful recipe has been used since 1 August 1291 in Switzerland. [31]

For reasons unknown, the Swiss canton system of governance option was

ignored. No second referendum was ever held. South Africa was handed over to the African National Congress without any mandate from the white electorate, their Swiss Canton option for multicultural self-rule governance, ignored. [32]

According to a us Consulate in Capetown State Department Cable (Reference

ID: 90CAPETOWN9732 | Date: 1990-01-17 15:03), the South African Government had made the ANC and Nelson Mandela aware that the South African Government was ―concerned over … over the working definition of ―One Man One Vote‖, among other ―White Fears‖ issues‖. Additionally the ANC were concerned about the 31 32

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1993/mandela-lecture.html http://wikileaks.org/cable/1990/01/90CAPETOWN97.html 11


reduction of violence and confrontation, since the ―absence of direct confrontation is demobilizing for the masses‖; i.e. the ANC need direct confrontation to mobilize their followers. [33]

F.W. de Klerk‘s submission to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission

confirms, among others Boers fears of the ‗swart gevaar‘: ―As far as relations with the other peoples of SA the National Party believed that its interests could be best served by following a policy of "separateness" - or apartheid. Only in this manner, would the whites in general - and Afrikaners in particular - avoid being overwhelmed by the numerical superiority of the black peoples of our country. Only in this manner would they be able to maintain their own identity and their right to rule themselves [..], because any other course would inevitably lead to inter-racial conflict.‖33 [34]

A statement34 by the FW de Klerk Foundation on 21 March 2003, states that

―Mr De Klerk deeply regrets that the TRC process did not achieve its objective of establishing the full truth related to the conflict of the past and that it has not promoted reconciliation in South Africa as intended.‖ [35]

According to an article in the Citizen, by Steven Motale, HNP leader Willie

Marais claimed that Former Prime Minister PW Botha had told a Dutch newspaper, that De Klerk had received between three and four million US dollars, honorary doctorates and the Nobel Peace Prize ―in exchange for handing over the country to the ANC‖.35 [36]

Mike Smith36, reports that PM PW Botha made the same allegations to the

editor of African Crisis: Jan Lamprecht. De Klerk threatened to sue for libel, but never did; and the NPA never bothered to investigate the matter. [37]

CRL Rights Commission: The Commission for the Promotion and Protection

of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities was established in terms of section 181(1)(c) of the Constitution and the subsequent : Commission for Submission to Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) by National Party Leader, President F.W. de Klerk Statement by the FW de Klerk Foundation regarding the court case between former President FW de Klerk and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. http://www.fwdeklerk.org/cgibin/giga.cgi?cmd=cause_dir_news_item&cause_id=2137&news_id=71386&cat_id=1594#.ULOoY-S-q7k 35 The Citizen (): De Klerk threatens legal action over ‗sell-out‘ allegations http://www.legalbrief.co.za/article.php?story=20061127090052909 36 Opening Pandora‘s Apartheid Box – Part 31- De Klerk‘s liberal conversion and the mindset of treason 33 34

12


the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities Act, 19 of 2002. [38]

The objects of the Commission are - (a) to promote respect for and further the

protection of the rights of cultural, religious and linguistic communities; (b) to promote and develop peace, friendship, humanity, tolerance and national unity among and within cultural, religious and linguistic communities, on the basis of equality, non-discrimination and free association; (c) to foster mutual respect among cultural, religious and linguistic communities; (d) to promote the right of communities to develop their historically diminished heritage; and (e) to recommend the establishment or recognition of community councils in accordance with section 36 or 37. [39]

Norwegian Nobel Committee selects the recipients of the Nobel Peace

Prize each year on behalf of Swedish industrialist Alfred Nobel's estate, based on instructions of Nobel's will, which requires the Nobel Peace Prize to be awarded ―to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.‖ [40]

According to Conservapedia37: ―As an unwritten rule, the [Nobel Peace Prize]

is not given to a conservative (such as Ronald Reagan or Pope John Paul II) or scientists advocating intelligent design, and it is not given to anyone who challenges the scientific establishment on the issues of the theory of evolution or theory of relativity, such as standouts Raymond Damadian, Fred Hoyle and Robert Dicke. The Nobel Prize is not given to any scientist who criticizes, publicly or privately, a liberal icon; the renowned physicist Edward Teller was denied the prize for criticizing the liberal J. Robert Oppenheimer, and the eminent physicist John Wheeler was denied the prize for privately supporting Teller. The award is sometimes given to a liberal politician or diplomat, such as Al Gore and Barack Obama, which can be seen as boosting his agenda. Most recently the award has been the subject of an investigation for corruption.‖

37

http://www.conservapedia.com/Nobel_Prize 13


[41]

Not one of the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prizes has ever been awarded to any

individual who addresses the root causes of war, by educating and advocating on behalf of Sustainable Security: living in harmony with nature‘s carrying capacity, by reducing overpopulation and overconsumption, which are the primary causes of resource scarcity. [42]

The Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee has refused to consider the role

of overpopulation and overconsumption as root cause factors of resource scarcity pushing society to conflict and war, where surplus populations are used as standing armies, and how those profiteering from overconsumption use their profits to promote pretend peace congresses and pretend Peace Prizes, awarding War is Peace Whore Prizes to perpetuate the ‗Control of Reproduction‘ Human Farming War Economy Racket paradigm. Nobel Peace Prizes Awarded for Reducing Scarcity: 0 Nobel Peace Prizes Awarded for Reducing Overpopulation: 0 Nobel Peace Prizes Awarded for Reducing Overconsumption: 0 900 Vietnam38, 40 Iraq and Afghanistan39 Veterans returned their ‗bullshit‘ medals to U.S. Congress and NATO. Nobel Peace Laureates returned their War is Peace Whore Medals: 0 [43]

Central Intelligence Agency: Director and David Petraeus: The Central

Intelligence Agency (CIA) is an independent civilian intelligence agency of the United States government. It is an executive agency and reports directly to the Director of National Intelligence, with responsibility for providing national security intelligence assessment to senior United States policymakers. [44]

David Petraeus served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from

September 6, 2011, until his forced resignation on November 9, 2012. Prior to his assuming the directorship of the CIA, Petraeus was a highly decorated four-star general, serving over 37 years in the United States Army. His last assignments in the Army were as commander of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan (USFOR-A) from July 4, 2010, to July 18, 2011. His other four-star assignments include serving as the 10th Commander, U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) from October 13, 2008, to June 30, 2010, and as 38 39

Vietnam Veterans Throw their Medals at Washington www.youtu.be/j7jhs-bGyFQ Iraq and Afghanistan veterans return medals at NATO Summit www.youtu.be/YX9PVC0phhI 14


Commanding General, Multi-National Force - Iraq (MNF-I) from February 10, 2007, to September 16, 2008. [45]

The Central Intelligence Agency motto is "And ye shall know the truth and

the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32); its intelligence mantra advises to follow the ―unvarnished truth‘40, and its Inspector General motto is to ―Follow the Truth, Wherever it Leads‖41. [46]

In 2000, Ted Koppel reported upon the CIA and Pentagon‘s national security

concerns related to overpopulation‘s effect upon resource scarcity and resource wars: CIA & Pentagon on Overpopulation and Resources Wars42; and the lack of political will of politicians to honestly confront the issue. [47]

David Petraeus, as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency was the

recipient of Applicants Maria Bochkareva Leaver Peacenik One Child Oath, as part of court proceedings in CCR v USA, in the United States Court of Appeals for Armed Forces (USCAAF), and subsequent thereto in the Supreme Court: Alien on Pale Blue Dot vs. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press43. [48]

On 09 November 2012, Director General Petraeus was suddenly fired (forced

to resign). [49]

On 16 November 2012, Applicant filed a request to Washington DC, FBI

Director: James McJunkin: to enquire whether the FBI‘s Petraeus-Broadwell investigation was used as convenient excuse to fire Petraeus to Protect the ‗War is Peace Whores‘ Human Factory Farming War Economy, from the threat of CIAPetraeus‘ implementation of Ecocentric ‗Maria Bochkareva‘ Sustainable Security Proactive Peace Plan raised in USCAAF: CCR v. USA, and USSC: Alien on Pale Blue Dot vs. RCFP, et al?

Davis, Jack: Improving CIA Analytic Performance: Analysts and the Policymaking Process; Sherman Kent Center for Intelligence Analysis Occasional Papers: Volume 1, Number 2, Sherman Kent Center www.cia.gov/library/kent-center-occasional-papers/pdf/OPNo2.pdf 41 www.cia.gov/offices-of-cia/inspector-general/index.html 42 sqswans.weebly.com/overpopulation-means-murder.html 43 http://sqswans.weebly.com/us-supreme-court.html 40

15


[50]

On 22 November 2012, Applicant filed a request for comment to White House:

National Security Advisor: Thomas Donilon44: Request for White House Comment: CNN I-Report: Was the FBI's Petraeus-Broadwell investigation used as a convenient excuse to fire Petraeus, to prevent Petraeus from implementing a Sustainable Security Peace Plan, submitted to the CIA, as part of court documents, filed in the United States Court of Appeals for Armed Forces, involving Wikileaks and Pfc Manning; on 15 October 2012? [51]

On 24 November 2012, Applicant filed a request for information to General

Petraeus45: Is LA Times ‗Petraeus - Comeback General‘ article a confirmation of Petraeus interest in unanswered question to (a) FBI-DC McJunkin & (b) National Security Advisor Mr. Donilon: i.e. Was Petraeus Fired to stop his support for (CCR v USA & Alien v RCFP) Sustainable Security, exposing Nobel's ―War is Peace‖ Fraud? OVERVIEW AND CHRONOLOGY OF FACTS: [52]

Respondents Afriforum, Malema, ANC and TAU-SA dispute arises out of the

action launched by Afriforum and Transvaal Agricultural Union (TAU) against Mr. Julius Malema, then leader of the African National Congress Youth League (ANCYL), in the South Gauteng Equality Court of Judge Colin Lamont, for publicly singing ―Kill the Boer‖. The African National Congress subsequently applied to intervene on behalf of Malema. [53]

Afriforum & TAU-SA argue among others, that the words communicated are

constitutionally prohibited for inciting harm and hatred against whites and farmers; that a reasonable person would consider the words to be intended to hurt, harm or incite hatred; and that Mr. Malema is an influential public figure whose utterances are widely reported. [54]

Malema and the ANC argue among others that there are many meanings for

the words ―Kill the Boer‖, that the Plaintiffs are inaccurately interpreting the words including misinterpreting Mr. Malema‗s intentions when he sings the words ―Kill the Boer‖. The words do not encourage farm murders, or hatred towards farmers; that their freedom of speech to sing ―Kill the Boer‖ should not be infringed and that there 44 45

http://sqswans.weebly.com/1/post/2012/11/121122_wh-natsec-donilon.html http://sqswans.weebly.com/1/post/2012/11/121123_genpetraeus1.html 16


should be a national dialogue about the song "awudubhule ibhunu" or "shoot the boer", given that some people had been offended by it46. This was a legitimate ―struggle song‖ in their war against Apartheid. [55]

The applicant filed an application47 to proceed as Amicus Curiae on 19 April

2011. The Registrar submitted the application to Judge Colin Lamont on 19 April 2011. Judge Colin Lamont noted the application as part of public court proceedings on 20 April 2011. [56]

Briefly, applicants Amicus Curiae evidence addressed: 1. ‗Kill the Boer‘ vs. ‗Kaffir‘ Hypocrisy: the parties hypocritical representation that there are many meanings for the words ―Kill the Boer‖, but only one meaning for ‗Kaffir‘48, that Afriforum and TAU-SA were inaccurately to interpreting the words ‗Kill the Boer‘, but that no African has ever inaccurately interpreted the words ‗Kaffir‘, that South Africans should have a national dialogue about ―Kill the Boer‖; but no national dialogue about ‗Kaffir‘. 2. Masculine Insecurity (reason and logic) Socio-Political Parasitic Profiteering off ‗Kill the Boer‘ vs. ‗Kaffir‘: Both parties deliberately encouraged their fragile ego members to be ‗hurt‘ and ‗outraged‘ respectively by ‗Kaffir‘ and ‗Kill the Boer‘, as part of the leaders manipulation of the emotions of their

http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article1024068.ece/Lets-talk-about-shoot-the-boer--Hanekom http://sqswans.weebly.com/sa-supreme-court-of-appeal.html 48 Radical Honesty definitions for ‗Kaffir‘: ‗Kaffir Behaviour‘: Cultural Beliefs and Procreation Behaviour Definition: Individuals who either independently or as a result of their cultural value systems, are incapable of, or unwilling to, practice sexual restraint and procreation responsibility; who consequently breed cockroach-prolifically without personal financial or psychological responsibility to, or emotional concern for, their offspring; and/or who abuse women and children as sexual or economic slaves procreated for such purpose; and/or whose cultural ideal of manhood endorses nonconsensual sex (rape) as their sexual slavery entitlement, etc. ‗Kaffir Etymology‘: Original Etymological Definition for ‗Kaffir‘: The word kāfir is the active participle of the Semitic root K-F-R ―to cover‖. As a pre-Islamic term it described farmers burying seeds in the ground, covering them with soil while planting; as they till the earth and ―cover up‖ the seeds; which is why earth tillers are referred to as ―Kuffar.‖ Thus, the word kāfir implies the meaning ―a person who hides or covers‖; To conceal, deny, hide or cover the truth. ‗Kaffir Legislation‘ = Inalienable Right to Breed‘ Poverty, Misery and War legislation; pretending it advocates for ‗peace‘ and ‗human rights‘: Kaffir Law/Legislation provides citizens with the Inalienable ‗Right to Breed‘ and Vote, but demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, etc, etc. (Kaffir Legislation covers up that an ‗Inalienable Right to Breed/laissez-faire birth control policy + No Social Welfare policies or practices provides for an equilibrium carrying capacity; whereas laissez-faire birth control within a welfare state, results in Runaway Population Growth, and ultimately greater misery, poverty and war .) 46 47

17


respective political basis, for their own socio-political status benefits, in their Left vs. Right Wing Propaganda Wars, used as a cover for their breeding and consumption wars, to profiteer from the Human Factory Farming War Economy. 3. The dispute is a consequence of masculine insecurity (reason and logic) lack of psychological integrity to seek the truth by transparently confronting the evidence of South Africa‘s TRC Fraud. The TRC‘s failure to investigate demographic youth bulge and population production breeding war acts of war as contributory factors to Apartheid violence. [57]

The parties masculine insecurity and lack of commitment to transparency to

seek the truth, wherever the truth may lead, resulted in their conspiracy to ignore Applicants evidence, and proceed as if it had never been submitted to the court. [58]

In Afri-Forum and Another v Malema and Others (20968/2010) [2011] ZAEQC

2; 2011 (6) SA 240 (EqC); [2011] 4 All SA 293 (EqC); 2011 (12) BCLR 1289 (EqC) (12 September 2011)49; Judge Lamont confirmed that: ―[48] Lara Johnstone, the sole member of an entity known as the Radical Honesty Culture and Religion delivered a number of documents by electronic transmission. I tabled the documents at the hearing and they form part of the record.‖ [59]

The ANC then proceeded to appeal the matter to the Supreme Court of

Appeal. On 30 December 2011, Applicant again submitted her application to the Court, in that the evidence submitted to the court of Judge Lamont had been ignored by the parties. [60]

On 22 May 2012 the Supreme Court of Appeal: Mr. BJ Mashinini responded

(PDF50) as follows on behalf of Honourable President Lex Mpati: Application to be admitted as Amicus Curiae in the matter of Julius Malema and Another vs Afriforum and Another Case Number 815/2011. The abovementioned application was referred to the President of this court during February 2012, before the record was lodged with this office. 49 50

http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAEQC/2011/2.html http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/120522_sca 18


He requested that the application be placed before him once the record was lodged. The record has now been lodged and the application has once again been placed before him. He has requested me to inform you as follows. 1. It does not appear, from the reading of the documents forming part of your application, that any value will be added to the arguments to be made by the parties legal representatives and thus will not be useful to the court. 2. The application is accordingly refused. [61]

On 18 July 2012, Applicant filed an Application (PDF51) for Permission to file

an application to the Constitutional Court to Review the Honourable Supreme Court of Appeal‘s 22 May 2012 decision to Refuse the Applicants Application to Proceed as an Amicus Curiae. Applicants Arguments: 1. IF: Supreme Court of Appeals Values endorse EcoFeminist Sustainable Democracy Transparency TruthSeeking Problem Solving: Applicant Should be Approved as an Amicus Curiae: 2. IF: Supreme Court of Appeal Values Endorse Masculine Insecurity War/Conflict Economy Tyranny Public Relations Deception Management Parasite Leeching Pretend Problem Solving; Applicant Should be Refused to Proceed as an Amicus Curiae. [62]

On 24 September Applicant filed an Application to Proceed as Amicus Curiae -

Brief in Propria Persona by Amici Curiae Lara Johnstone in Support of an Ecocentric Wild Law Sustainable Security Perspective52 - in the US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces, in the matter of CCR v USA. [63]

Applicants argued, in pertinent part, that (I) it would be impossible for Pfc

Manning to receive a free and fair trial in the sustainable security matter, if the media corruptly abuse their publicity power, misrepresenting or censoring Ecocentric or Non-PC arguments; effectively conducting a trial by media, thereby undermining the credibility of the court‗s decisions, due to public ignorance of all arguments submitted to the court; as had occurred in other politically sensitive trials, such as Citizen vs. McBride (CCT 23-10), Afriforum vs. Malema (SCA 815/11), Norway vs 51 52

http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/120718_sca_815-11 http://sqswans.weebly.com/us-court-of-appeals-for-armed-forces.html 19


Breivik (NO: ODC #11-188627MED-OTIR/05) and USA vs Lakin; and (II) if Pfc Manning‘s actions were indeed Ecocentrically motivated (―his Pale blue dot perspective is that humanity is destroying its home‖), he deserved a free and fair truthseeker trial, but that ―it is possible that those who prefer a Left/Right wing Propaganda trial, will use their Publicity Power to pressure the court and trial proceedings, and Pfc Manning, to such effect, which would not be in Pfc Manning‗s truth seeking interest.‖ [64]

All Afriforum Parties, including the SCA Registrar (Zachia Pule) were

provided with a transparency copy of the Ecocentric Amicus to the USCAAF. [65]

CCR v USA53 is a Petition for Extraordinary Relief seeking public access to

documents in the court-martial proceedings against Pfc. Bradley Manning, ―including papers filed by the parties, court orders, and transcripts of the proceedings‖. It is petition based upon the proceedings in the United States vs. Private Bradley Manning court martial of the alleged leak of the largest amount of classified information in U.S. history to Wikileaks54; the (i) July 12, 2007 US Army AH-64 Apache helicopters air-to-ground attacks in Al-Amin al-Thaniyah, Baghdad (―Collateral Murder‖55); (ii) 250,000 United States diplomatic cables (Cablegate56); and (iii) 500,000 army reports from Iraq (Iraq War logs 57) and Afghanistan (Afghan War logs58). [66]

On 27 September, the Appeals Court wrote to Respondents Afriforum, TAU-

SA, Malema and the ANC, attempting to avoid confronting Applicant���s Request for Permission to file an application to the Constitutional Court to Review the Honourable Supreme Court of Appeal‘s 22 May 2012 decision to Refuse the Applicants Application to Proceed as an Amicus Curiae; by asking the parties to explore the possibility of off the court record mediation, which was agreed to under the facilitation of Charles Nupen.

ccrjustice.org/ourcases/current-cases/ccr-et-al-v-usa-and-lind-chief-judge www.alexaobrien.com/secondsight/wikileaks/bradley_manning/ appellate_exhib/list_of_appellate_exhibits_us_v_pfc_manning.html 55 www.collateralmurder.com 56 wikileaks.org/cablegate.html 57 wikileaks.org/irq/ 58 wikileaks.org/afg/ 53 54

20


[67]

On 01 October, Applicant sent a transparent copy of the USCAAF Amicus

dealing with Media‘s abuse of publicity power in politically sensitive trials, to the Judicial Service Commission, noting that ―Three of the five examples of blatant media abuse of publicity power in these sustainable security court cases, are South African court cases, namely: * Concourt (CCT 23-10): Citizen v. McBride; and * Gauteng High Court/Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA 815/11): Afriforum / TAU v. Malema / ANC, and * SA / Patricia de Lille v. Lara Johnstone (CAS 572/02; GSH 20/2003; HC-WC Appeal A 696-04, CT-CAS 1340/7/07 & 17/1384/07 & 14/1198/08)‖ [68]

USCAAF justices refused to grant the Amicus application. On 15 October

Applicant filed a Petition for Reconsideration59, wherein applicant provided Pfc Manning the opportunity, to prove to the court and to Central Intelligence Agency: Director David Petraeus, Manning‘s honourable Ecocentric motivations for his Wikileaks disclosure acts. [69]

The Petition challenges the court to determine whether Pfc Manning‘ is indeed

Ecocentrically motivated, and to provide him the opportunity to unequivocally declare his Ecocentric motivations, by challenging Pfc Manning‘, the CCR PeacenikS and their ‗Anti-War‘ and ‗Peace‘ community friends, whether they are Willing to Pay the One Child Per Family Price for Peace, by taking the Maria Bochkareva Leaver Peacenik Oath? [70]

The Maria Bochkareva Leaver Peacenik Oath requests, that if Pfc Bradley

Manning is willing to take the Oath, that the Director General of the Central Intelligence Agency, make an official request to the relevant authority, for all charges against Pfc. Manning in this matter to be withdrawn and the matter to be considered amicably resolved, forthwith. [71]

Secondly, that the Central Intelligence Agency‘s Kent Center60 establish a

fund for contributions in honour of Pfc Manning, to establish a bi-annual ‗Maria Bochkareva Leaver Peacenik Honor Medal‘, to be awarded on the 23 rd of April, of every year, for the individual who has done the most to educate their community, or

59 60

http://sqswans.weebly.com/15-oct--petition.html www.cia.gov/library/kent-center-occasional-papers/index.html 21


nation on the role of overpopulation and overconsumption as factors pushing society to conflict and war. [72]

On 31 October, Respondents Afriforum, TAU-SA, Malema and ANC concluded

their mediation agreement (PDF61), wherein they initially agree in (g) and (h) that the ― … Mediation Agreement will be made an Order of Court substituting the Equality Court Order. In this regard the parties agree to jointly approach the Honourable Judge Lamont for this purpose soon upon the signing of this Mediation Agreement. In the event the Honourable Judge Lamont were to decline the substitution of the Equality Court Order, Afriforum and TAU-SA irrevocably undertake to abandon the Equality Court Order and simultaneously the parties will apply to have this Mediation Agreement made an Order of Court.‖ These two paragraphs were subsequently deleted from the agreement. [73]

On 02 November, Applicant filed Alien on Pale Blue Dot vs. Reporters

Committee for Freedom of the Press62, an In Forma Pauperis Writ of Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, to determine whether the CAAF decision to refuse the Ecocentric Amicus, was (i) a procedural due process failure; (ii) Anthropocentric ‗viewpoint discrimination‘, (iii) a violation of Petitioner‘s ―Religious Free speech‘ rights. [74]

On 09 November 2012, Director General Petraeus was suddenly and very

strangely fired (forced to resign). [75]

On 14 November, three Nobel Laureates – one being Desmond Tutu -- publish

an Open Letter in CCR Appellant publications: The Nation63, The Guardian64 & Salon65, saluting Pfc Manning as a fellow War is Peace Whore. [76]

On 16 November 2012, Applicant filed a request to Washington DC, FBI

Director: James McJunkin66: to enquire whether the FBI‘s Petraeus-Broadwell investigation was used as convenient excuse to fire Petraeus to Protect the ‗War is http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/121131_sca_851-11-order http://sqswans.weebly.com/us-supreme-court.html 63 http://www.thenation.com/article/171272/nobel-laureates-salute-bradley-manning?page=full 64 http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/nov/16/bradley-manning-americans-support 65 www.salon.com/2012/11/15/nobel_peace_laureates_condemn_prosecution_of_bradley_manning/ 66 http://sqswans.weebly.com/16-nov-fbi-mcjunkin.html 61 62

22


Peace Whores‘ Human Factory Farming War Economy, from the threat of CIAPetraeus‘ implementation of Ecocentric ‗Maria Bochkareva‘ Sustainable Security Proactive Peace Plan raised in USCAAF: CCR v. USA, and USSC: Alien on Pale Blue Dot vs. RCFP, et al? [77]

On 22 November 2012, Applicant filed a request for comment to White House:

National Security Advisor: Thomas Donilon67: Request for White House Comment: CNN I-Report: Was the FBI's Petraeus-Broadwell investigation used as a convenient excuse to fire Petraeus, to prevent Petraeus from implementing a Sustainable Security Peace Plan, submitted to the CIA, as part of court documents, filed in the United States Court of Appeals for Armed Forces, involving Wikileaks and Pfc Manning; on 15 October 2012? [78]

On 24 November 2012, Applicant filed a request for information to General

Petraeus68: Is LA Times ‗Petraeus - Comeback General‘ article a confirmation of Petraeus interest in unanswered question to (a) FBI-DC McJunkin & (b) National Security Advisor Mr. Donilon: i.e. Was Petraeus Fired to stop his support for (CCR v USA & Alien v RCFP) Sustainable Security, exposing Nobel's ―War is Peace‖ Fraud? [79]

Applicants Pay-the-Price-4-Peace-Peacenik (PP4PP) Credibility:

[80]

Pay-the-Price-4-Peace One Child Per Family Procreation Credibility:

[81]

Please find attached Petitioner‘s Maria Bochkareva Leaver Peacenik One Child Oath:, submitted to the Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CCR v USA: USCA Misc. Dkt. No. 12-8027/AR69) and Director General of the Central Intelligence Agency: David Petraeus70, on 15 October 2012, and to FBI: Washington DC Director McJunkin on 16 November 2012 (FBI-DC: Dir McJunkin: RE: FBI's Petraeus Broadwell Investigation71).

[82]

Pay-the-Price-4-Peace Consumption and Carbon Footprint Credibility:

http://sqswans.weebly.com/1/post/2012/11/121122_wh-natsec-donilon.html http://sqswans.weebly.com/1/post/2012/11/121123_genpetraeus1.html 69 http://sqswans.weebly.com/us-court-of-appeals-for-armed-forces.html 70 http://sqswans.weebly.com/15-oct-price4peaceoath.html 71 http://sqswans.weebly.com/16-nov-fbi-mcjunkin.html 67 68

23


24


[83]

According to Ecological Footprint (myfootprint.org), Petitioner‘s ecological

consumption footprint is 10.83. [Fig.01] [84]

According to Earth Conservation Plan (earthlab.com) my Carbon Outpout is

0.8 tons (South Africa: 13.1; World: 17.2) and my Earth Conservation Plan score is 171 (South Africa 324; World 384). [Fig.02] [85]

Relief Requested:

[86]

I consequently submit that it is plainly in the interests of justice, gender equality, sincere

reconciliation, honest race relations, and sustainable security of South African citizens that this application be dealt with on its merits. [87]

In the circumstances, I humbly request the relief as set out in the Notice of Motion to

which this Affidavit is attached. Dated at George, this 23rd of November, 2012. Signed and Sworn to at George on this the 23rd day of November 2012, the Deponent acknowledging that she knows and understands the contents of this Affidavit, and that she has no objection to taking the prescribed oath and that the oath is binding on her conscience.

Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Encl: Annex A: 08/11/2012: Judicial Service Commission Ack. Rec. of Complaint Annex B: 15/10/2012: Maria Bochkareva Leaver Peacenik Oath to CIA

25


Annexure “A”


Annexure “B”


IN

THE

UNITED

STATES

COURT

OF

APPEALS

FOR

THE

ARMED

FORCES

CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, ET AL.,

PETITION

Petitioners-Appellants,

FOR RECONSIDERATION:

Crim. App. Misc. Dkt. No. 20120514

v. USCA Misc.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COL. DENISE LIND, MILITARY JUDGE

Dkt. No. 12-8027/AR

Respondents-Appellees.

TO THE JUDGES ARMED

OF THE UNITED

FORCES

AND THE DIRECTOR

INTELLIGENCE MARIA WHO

BOCHKAREVA IS WILLING

STATES

AGENCY:

LEAVER

COURT GENERAL

GENERAL

PEACENIK

PETRAEUS:

OATH:

PER FAMILY

of Lara

FOR THE

OF THE CENTRAL

DAVID

ONE CHILD

TO PAY THE ONE CHILD

Declaration

OF APPEALS

'I AM A LEAVER, PRICE

FOR PEACE'

Johnstone

I, Lara Johnstone, declare as follows: [1]

I

am

an

Sustainable BRIEF

IN

SUPPORT

adult

Security

PROPRIA OF

AN

Radical

Honoursty

practicing

PERSONA

BY

ECOCENTRIC

Ecofeminist

paralegal,

AMICI WILD

CURIAE LAW

the LARA

Wild

author

of

JOHNSTONE

SUSTAINABLE

Law the IN

SECURITY

PERSPECTIVE, in this matter; member of Friends of Wikileaks, and the Radical Honesty culture. I reside in George, Southern Cape, South

Africa;

r- :> T? ~

.. c:::-

~ ~

where

<f- 'Z9=>

I

run

a

small

"'1-? SUID-AFRII<AANSE

POLISIEDIENS

.~.

s'TATION COMMISSIONER

2012 -1 0- 1 4

EcoFeminist

pedal-powered


wormery business.

I enclose

for verification [2]

this [3]

provide

declaration,

territories,

which

civilization

is

I

have

for

rapidly

reduce

CIA

very

simple

resulted

in

populations

Pentagon

are

now all to

colonized;

a crisis

of

which

Jack

Dr.

art,

?:.?T ? -==e4-~

will

to less

than

per family

Conflict

spiral;

Decline

S:ATION COMMISSIONER

-----

1m2 -10- '14 STAS:E KOMMISSARIS

~~,.--'A~"~~Q..ry~.--_._~_ ~

-:-:::>

1:1.-

~I

""re.J

t,~_\;"",:",,~:

death

(3) Human behavior

How Much Population

"'-1P-?

_

•••

~_

.••••

..."

it

must

100 million,

to adopt a one child

the death

shows

sustainable,

and technology,

(1) The Scarcity

(4 )

our

Rapid

Dr. Alpert

Collapse3,

population

choosing

which

video:

Alpert's

science,

spiral;

to

new

means

conflict,

to advance

policy:

failure

200 years.

or Civilization

global

how our

colonize

to

to become peaceful,

->

to

explanation

our

1 sqswans.weebly.com/overpopulation-means-murder.html 2 sqswans.weebly.com/human-predicament.html 3 sqswans. weebly. com/rapid-population..sarJR;i'ifR~61tJrti.!l POL/SIEDIENS

---- ->

&

CommonSense Required2

have

watched

(2) The system trips death

Nightline:

human experiment

means of humanity procreation

accordance

Resources Scarcity Death Spiral, which

heading

Decline

and continue

in

the

it:

Better

surplus

also

the

act,

Alpert's

the wars of the past

Population

the

Jack

the Conflict pressured

that

Dr.

limitations

previously

[5 ]

Agency with

and Resources Wars1 videos.

process

dwarf all

to

the Ted Koppel's

HumanPredicament:

understand

Intelligence

and authority

I have watched

thought

Central

should I violate

on Overpopulation

video:

the

declaration

I have watched

[4]

Passport

purposes.

I hereby following

a copy of my South African

<.' !'••••__, _-..;r

'::'~_~"":"'"-=.~~~,~.~:~

by only

spiral; trips Saves


Civilization?;

(5) Are you sure

below 100 million?

(a) What if

bigger? / (b) What if What if

people

What if

the richest

advances Decline [6]

faster

then

that

towards

I hereby declare child,

[8]

or less,

violate the

this

Central

Leaver

the

this CIA to

2072

onto

a

to pay the one

that

if

I

authorize

remove me and my children

genepool,

I hereby

Prosecutorial

if

One Child Oath,

further

inform

CIA

confirms

the

with my violation

or Police

to be wasted on the matter,

-10- 1 4

causes

remove my dishonourable

in accordance

S:;.TfOi'J COMMISSIONER

the root

I thereby

Leaver Peacenik

occurred

POLISIEDIENS

who is

by assassination.

assassination

are required

Population

peacenik,

I understand

One Child Oath,

that

SUID-AFRIKAANS5:

Rapid

humans on Planet

that

Office,

no further

(d)

of peace.

Prosecutor's

oath,

It's

who is willing

Agency to

Should I have violated

from the

/ (c)

improvement? /

by addressing

declare

Leaver Peacenik

require

is

peace.

hereby

Intelligence

and thereby

self

( 6)

to move the

I am leaver,

from the Leaver genepool, [9]

spread

are shorter?

I am a sincere

per family price

I furthermore

rich-poor

richer? / (e) What if technology

of peace,

and helping trend

population

collapse.

to pay the price

procreation

reduce

times for

we expect?;

declare

of conflict,

to

initial

desires

keep getting

or Civilization

willing

the

re-generation

have undying

I hereby

[7]

soil

we have

Investigation

genes

the that

local my

of this resources

of my assassination.


[10]

I further hereby

willing

request,

that if Pfc Bradley Manning

is

to take this Leaver Peacenik One Child Oath, that the

Director

General

of the

official

request

to

against

Central

the

Pfc. Manning

Intelligence

relevant

authority,

in this matter

Agency, for

all

to be withdrawn

make

an

charges and

the

matter to be considered amicably resolved, forthwith. [11]

Secondly,

that

establish

Center4

Manning,

to

a

the fund

establish

Peacenik Honor Medal',

a

Central for

Intelligence

contributions

bi-annual

'Maria

in

Agency's honour

Bochkareva

Kent

of

Pfc

Leaver

to be awarded on the 23rd of April,

of

every year, for the individual who has done the most to educate their

community,

or nation

on the role

of overpopulation

and

overconsumption as factors pushing society to conflict and war. [12]

Pursuant

to 28

u. S.C §

1746, I declare under penalty

of

perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed this 14th day of October, 2012 George, South Africa

SUIO-AFRIKi>,ANSE POLISIEDIENS STATJON COMMISSIONER

Lara Johnstone 2012 -10- 1

i,

STASIE KOfv1MISSARIS GI::UKI.;it:

i,]b4~"iWM;'~~ ~i:.§1~~kent ~""9.'

"" ••••~J;

,\,~""':

•..•·,,",:L

_

~

_

,.-~:::

~:;"_=

",,,,\.-.:::,_

-center-occasional-papers/

index. html


= === = = = =

E2=.S

Passport I Passeport

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA I REPUBLIQUE D'AFRIQUE DU SUD ripelryr-~

,~'!}h,'

'Cx~:j;;~ay..s

C.our.'lj't:OOe

PA

.••..,

C>.;

;..asseoo~':

A00011592

ZAF

$t;ma.~ / N()f1)

JOHNSON LARA Na!~'Y/~i;stiC:"ah!~

SOUTH

I

AFRICAN

SUD-AFRICAIN ldtJntiry J"kJ1 Nodidl!nrite

04 DEC 1966 S./?x;

ZAF

).J:e ':~,;ssu'<?t Ca~'·:if!

<~

f1AY 2009

~ .~ DEPT

:..~"

OF HOME

05 MAY 2019

PAZAFJOHNSON«LARA««««««««««««« A000115928ZAF6612049F19050546612040012086<42

Ek (;<.",

~?n; n~o/2'r oat hir:1G1G rl:')Kumcnt 'n WGifJ s:.f~(\rjfi5i vnn ;:,J.,:;,;i·':'~ \l';:i (.1::'.;; rny ~?-i)(~o-rriUk bev~stjg is en dati

\!(/ '1?'~" 111/ \iJ,r,,},';;z:rni;igs, die oorspronkHke \,Irf&\~g~WY~!k!I:;.nle

rJit:

SUID-AFRIKAANSE

nie op enige

$;ATION

c;~:'tiI'! th:.:t th!n document is a true reproduction/copy of the ,rigi,1:1: Ychlch \'lUG >1xamil,,,d by me and thai, from my ·bsl~r''ll.k.n;:;, thl~ cr:gil1JJI h;18 not been altered in any manner,

POLISIEDIENS

COMMISSIONER

J

.,,~~~

14

iJ-Aufflcf!~t f A!,,~Q(h~

~if>.~;1

Oa:5of eX"~1/ C1it~If~tWaN;r:

-~/

L~.$-~,t" "1'~~

Se,re

F

06

6612040012086

2012

c ••.•. -r- ?-~'-fCJ="7-7 . )_.~•.~•••• '.~"'..,.-.._ I..... "'.~~'.H..

-10- 1 4

STASIE I<OMMISSARIS

~-"-

~~At"'!Ei ~""'a~"'I~~#~~~~-"'-:-''''--'' ~",~~~-::/.4:' ;~-:~!'-~~~ ,~~'4'.

~ ••.•~ ~~J.

". ;;_"~

\,

'~"'-''''''

. ~~

~~_J~

.•••-

AFFAIRS


CERTIFICATE OF FILING & AUTHORISATION TO CIA: DIR.GEN. PETRAEUS

I certify

that

on 15 October

my MARIA BOCHKAREVA verification Central

to

General

D.C.

granting

General

I certify

that

at 18:34

HRS

(GMT+2),

I faxed

LEAVER PEACENIK ONE CHILD OATH and passport

Intelligence

Washington,

2012

David

Petraeus,

20505, Petraeus

by

of

Office

Agency,

facsimile

the relevant

I electronically

Director

General,

Public

Affairs,

authorization,

submitted

on

482-1739,

(703)

to:

as stated.

16 October

2012;

copy to: 1. USCAAF

Clerk

of the Court:

William

DeCicco:

bill.decicco@armfor.uscourts.gov 2. USA Counsel:

Captain

Chad

Fisher:

Chad.m.fisher.mil@mail.mil 3. Pfc Manning

Counsel:

David

Coombs

Esq:

coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.com 4. US House

Intelligence

Committee:

Intelligence.HPSCI@mail.house.gov

Executed George,

this

16th day

of October,

2012

South Africa

,

Lara

Johnstone

a


12-11-23: CCT: Alien v. Afriforum: Affidavit & Enclosures