Page 1

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No. CCT 06/11 In the matter between: RADICAL HONESTY – SA

First Applicant

LARA JOHNSTONE

Second Applicant

And SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL EDITORS FORUM (SANEF)

First Respondent

MONDLI MAKHANYA

Second Respondent

SA PRESS OMBUDSMAN: JOE THLOLOE

Third Respondent

SA PRESS APPEALS PANEL: JUDGE RALPH ZULMAN

Fourth Respondent

SA DEP. PRESS OMBUDSMAN: JOHAN RETIEF

Fifth Respondent

SOUTH AFRICAN PRESS ASSOCIATION (SAPA)

Sixth Respondent

MARK VAN DER VELDEN

Seventh Respondent

BUSINESS DAY

Eighth Respondent

PETER BRUCE

Ninth Respondent

BUSINESS REPORT

Tenth Respondent

JABULANI SIKHAKHANE

Eleventh Respondent

CAPE ARGUS

Twelfth Respondent

CHRIS WITFIELD

Thirteenth Respondent

CAPE TIMES

Fourteenth Respondent

ALIDE DASNOIS

Fifteenth Respondent

CITY PRESS

Sixteenth Respondent

FERIAL HAFFAJEE

Seventeenth Respondent

THE CITIZEN

Eighteenth Respondent

MARTIN WILLIAMS

Nineteenth Respondent

DAILY DISPATCH

Twentieth Respondent

ANDREW TRENCH

Twenty-First Respondent

DAILY MAVERICK

Twenty-Second Respondent

BRKIC BRANKO

Twenty-Third Respondent

DAILY NEWS

Twenty-Fourth Respondent

ALAN DUNN

Twenty-Fifth Respondent

EAST COAST RADIO

Twenty-Sixth Respondent

DIANE MACPHERSON

Twenty-Seventh Respondent

EYEWITNESS NEWS

Twenty-Eighth Respondent

KATY KATAPODIS

Twenty-Ninth Respondent


INDEPENDENT ONLINE

Thirtieth Respondent

ADRIAN EPHRAM

Thirty-First Respondent

MAIL AND GUARDIAN

Thirty-Second Respondent

NIC DAWES

Thirty-Third Respondent

THE MERCURY

Thirty-Fourth Respondent

ANGELA QUINTAL

Thirty-Fifth Respondent

NEWS 24

Thirty-Sixth Respondent

JANNIE MOMBERG

Thirty-Seventh Respondent

PRETORIA NEWS

Thirty-Eighth Respondent

ZINGISA MKHUMA

Thirty-Ninth Respondent

SA STAR

Fortieth Respondent

MOEGSIEN WILLIAMS

Forty-First Respondent

SUNDAY INDEPENDENT

Forty-Second Respondent

MAKHUDU SEFARA

Forty-Third Respondent

SUNDAY TRIBUNE

Forty-Fourth Respondent

PHILANI MGWABA

Forty-Fifth Respondent

TIMES LIVE

Forty-Sixth Respondent

RAY HARTLEY

Forty-Seventh Respondent

3rd DEGREE

Forty-Eighth Respondent

DEBORA PATTA

Forty-Ninth Respondent

BEELD

Fiftieth Respondent

TIM DU PLESSIS

Fifty-First Respondent

DAILY SUN

Fifty-Second Respondent

THEMBA KHUMALO

Fifty-Third Respondent

DIE BURGER

Fifty-Fourth Respondent

HENRY JEFFERY

Fifty-Fifth Respondent

BUN BOOYSEN

Fifty-Sixth Respondent

E-NEWS

Fifty-Seventh Respondent

PATRICK CONROY

Fifty-Eighth Respondent

FINANCIAL MAIL

Fifty-Ninth Respondent

BARNEY MTHOMBOTHI

Sixtieth Respondent

FINWEEK

Sixty-Fist Respondent

COLLEEN NAUDE

Sixty-Second Respondent

THE GEORGE HERALD

Sixty-Third Respondent

MANDI BOTHA

Sixty-Fourth Respondent

INDEPENDENT ON SATURDAY

Sixty-Fifth Respondent

TREVOR BRUCE

Sixty-Sixth Respondent


702 RADIO

Sixty-Seventh Respondent

PHELADI GWANGWA

Sixty-Eighth Respondent

RAPPORT

Sixty-Ninth Respondent

LISA ALBRECHT

Seventieth Respondent

THE SATURDAY STAR

Seventy-First Respondent

BRENDAN SEERY

Seventy-Second Respondent

SOWETAN

Seventy-Third Respondent

BONGANI KESWA

Seventy-Fourth Respondent

THE HERALD

Seventy-Fifth Respondent

JEREMY MCCABE

Seventy-Sixth Respondent

VOLKSBLAD

Seventy-Seventh Respondent

AINSLEY MOOS

Seventy-Eighth Respondent

ROD AMNER

Seventy-Ninth Respondent

ROBERT BRAND

Eightieth Respondent

GUY BERGER

Eighty-First Respondent

HARRY DUGMORE

Eighty-Second Respondent

HAROLD GESS

Eighty-Third Respondent

JANE DUNCAN

Eighty-Fourth Respondent

ANTON HARBER

Eighty-Fifth Respondent

FRANZ KRUGER

Eighty-Sixth Respondent

WILLIAM BIRD

Eighty-Seventh Respondent

PROJOURN STEERING COMMITTEE

Eighty-Eighth Respondent

NOTICE OF MOTION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the applicants intend to apply to the Constitutional Court for direct access, as a Pauperis Propria Persona / Litigant in Person; for a [I] writ of Habeus Mentem [A] and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review [B]-[E]:

[I] WRIT OF HABEUS MENTEM: [A]

A writ of Habeus Mentem – the right of a wo/man to their own mind and culture -- is invoked in accordance with the Constitutional rights to invoking1 cultural law2 in S. 15

1 Ex parte Minister of Native Affairs: In re Yako v Beyi 1948 (1) SA 388 (A) at 397: Appellate Division held that neither common nor customary law was prima facie applicable. Courts had to consider all the circumstances of a case, and, without any preconceived view about the applicability of one or other legal system, select the appropriate law on the basis of its inquiry. 2 SALC, Sept 1999: Report on Conflicts of law: P.22: ‘1.58. The Constitution now provides an entitlement for invoking customary law in legal suits. Because ss 30 and 31 specifically guarantee an individual and a group's right to pursue a culture of choice, it could be argued that application of customary law has become a constitutional right. Previously, the state had assumed complete discretion in deciding whether and to what extent customary law should be recognized, an attitude typical of colonial thinking, for Africans were subject to


(3), 30, 31, and 185, and psychological integrity in Section 12; the former which may require the application of choice of law rules. NOTE ON HABEUS MENTEM: The title of the writ -- Habeus Mentem - is borrowed from Aldous Huxley’s A Brave New World Revisited; where he describes the insidious conspiracy to manipulate the masses by propaganda and lies, so as to make them controllable under the “steadily increasing pressures of over-population and of the over-organization imposed by growing numbers and advancing technology” It is perfectly possible for a man to be out of prison, and yet not free -- to be under no physical constraint and yet to be a psychological captive, compelled to think, feel and act as the representatives of the national State, or of some private interest within the nation, want him to think, feel and act. There will never be such a thing as a writ of habeas mentem; for no sheriff or jailer can bring an illegally imprisoned mind into court, and no person whose mind had been made captive by the methods outlined in earlier articles would be in a position to complain of his captivity. The nature of psychological compulsion is such that those who act under constraint remain under the impression that they are acting on their own initiative. The victim of mind-manipulation does not know that he is a victim. To him, the walls of his prison are invisible, and he believes himself to be free. That he is not free is apparent only to other people. His servitude is strictly objective.

[II] A WRIT OF CERTIORARI / REVIEW OF: [B]

South African Press Council and SA Press Appeals Panel (SAPAP) [1] lack of transparent administrative decision-making, and secrecy of complaints statistics; [2] 24 June 2009 ruling by Ombudsman: Joe Thloloe, [3] 11 October, 3 and 4 November 2010 rulings by Deputy Ombudsman: Johan Retief, and [4] 17 and 24 November 2010 rulings by SA Press Appeals Panel Judge Ralph Zulman; and

[C]

SA Media and Journalists Respondents (“SA Media”) endorse: (a) Media Corruption and legal, political and cultural persecution of minorities, and (b) Media “Rainbow-Rule-ofLaw3 Reasonableness4” Intellectual Incompetence5; and preference for propaganda

whatever policies the conquering state chose to impose on them. Now, however, the state has a duty to allow people to participate in the culture they choose, implicit in this duty is a responsibility to uphold the institutions on which that culture is based.’ 3 In Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee , Judge McNair’s judgement dealt with the application of the common law reasonableness test in regards to negligence, where the ‘reasonableness test’ circumstance involved a special skill or competence. 4 In Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’ filed as Expert Witness Affidavit in High Court, W.C. # 19963-09; Dr. Blanton explains what happens in cultures of ideological obedience; how and why studies show that 92% of citizens lack the psychological and emotional – sincere forgiveness -- skills for non-violent disobedience. In Practicing Radical Honesty, Dr. Blanton describes the importance of sincere forgiveness to changing the statistics of the Stanley Milgram studies of Obedience, which proved that 92% of humans are as culturally, racially, ideologically or religiously obedient, and unquestioning to their beliefs as Adolf Eichmann was to Nazism. In a clash between their ideology and scientific evidentiary truth, their obedience to their ideology, causes them to consign the truth to the collateral damage refuse bin. Individuals who practice sincere forgiveness, and who are not obedient to ideology, but to scientific truth, always side in favour of scientific truth. 5 Put simply the Dunning & Kruger effect “is a cognitive bias in which an unskilled person makes poor decisions and reaches erroneous conclusions, but their incompetence denies them the metacognitive ability to realize their mistakes.”


smear campaigns, and repudiation of scientific journalism i.e.: [5] ‘SA Media’s’ Deliberate Indifference to Radical Honesty/White Refugee legal and political persecution; [6] ‘SA Media’s’ endorsement of media corruption (negligent and/or deliberate intellectual incompetence), and [7] repudiation of scientific journalism6: censorship of root cause “the most potent weapons of war are the penis and the womb7 problem solving, as per their endorsement of censorship of issues raised in Dr. T. Michael Maher’s study: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population – Environment connection8; and Dr. Brad Blanton’s Radical Honesty About Anger and Forgiveness9 expert witness affidavit as to how sincere forgiveness vs fake forgiveness affects the common law ‘reasonable reader’; as per orders applied for as set out below.

RADICAL HONESTY CULTURE: CONFLICT OF LAW: TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Applicants are members of the Radical Honesty culture and religion, whose preference is to resolve misunderstandings of interpretation and/or disagreements by means of Radical Honesty Cultural Social Contract: Being Specific About Anger and Forgiveness (PDF10), personally, honestly and sincerely face-to-face. Any respondent willing to resolve this misunderstanding honestly, sincerely face-to-face, where applicants are not required to be two-faced political correct hypocrite sycophants; the matter can be so resolved, out of court, with such respondent. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Concourt application will be made on a date and at a time arranged in conjunction with the Concourt registrar and respondents.

Orders Applied for In this Application for Habeus Mentem and Review: [1]

A Writ of Habeus Mentem: The writ of Habeus Mentem shall confirm – for the record in this matter:

6

“WikiLeaks coined a new type of journalism: scientific journalism. We work with other media outlets to bring people the news, but also to prove it is true. Scientific journalism allows you to read a news story, then to click online to see the original document it is based on. That way you can judge for yourself: Is the story true? Did the journalist report it accurately?” -- Don't shoot messenger for revealing uncomfortable truths , by Julian Assange, The Australian, December 08, 2010 http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/wikileaks/dont-shoot-messenger-for-revealing-uncomfortable-truths/story-fn775xjq1225967241332 7 “We must all understand that the most potent weapons of war are the penis and the womb. Therefore, if you cannot convince a group to control its population by discussion, debate, intelligent analysis etc., you must consider their action in using the penis and the womb to increase population an act of war.” –-- Jason G. Brent, Attorney and author of Humans: An Endangered Species, as quoted in Boer Volkstaat for African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16 (www.african-white-refugees.co.nr) 8 How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection, by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D. http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/mahertm_journo-env-pop-connection?mode=a_p 9 Being Specific About Anger and Forgiveness; excerpts from Practicing Radical Honesty, by Dr. Brad Blanton http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/090611_sqworms_prh-social-contract?mode=a_p 10 Being Specific About Anger and Forgiveness; excerpts from Practicing Radical Honesty, by Dr. Brad Blanton http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/090611_sqworms_prh-social-contract?mode=a_p


[a]

First and Second Respondent are members of the Radical Honesty culture11, who provided Respondents with the opportunity to resolve these matters, out of court, upon the Truth and Forgiveness Social Contract: Being Specific About Anger and Forgiveness12; as excerpted from: Practicing Radical Honesty13.

[b]

Radical Honesty SA is founded on Radical Honesty Social Contract and Ecolaw14 principles: (a) A psychological integrity environment of philosophical courageous truth searching honesty and sincere forgiveness is a sine qua non15 for healthy, transparent relationships that result in the co-creation of a code of conduct that enables non-violent honest sincere resolutions to disagreements;

(b) A healthy

ecological environment, with due regard for carrying capacity laws of sustainability is a sine qua non16 for all other constitutional rights17. [d]

Radical Honesty SA’s working hypothesis: First to Eighty-Eighth Respondents are imprisoned in their minds distorted and only partly conscious maps, but who are too psychologically incompetently unconscious – Dunning and Kruger Effect18 - to be aware of their mind-slavery. They are mind enslaved/imprisoned by their fragile ego’s, which are under the false impression that they act on their own initiative, but who are emotional and psychological slaves to their suppressed anger, resentments and politically correct ideologies. Their minds maps of reality are distorted by their repressed anger and resentment, their fake forgiveness and fake relationships, marketing character19 shame20; the greater the amount of suppressed anger, resentments and sincerity, the greater their distorted view of reality. Radical

11

Members of the Radical Honesty culture practice total transparency, a commitment to practicing radical honesty with friends, colleagues, leaders, followers, enemies and themselves; to remaining in any disagreement with each other, until such disagreement has been resolved by sincere forgiveness, no matter how long it takes. Radical Honesty practitioners believe that the key to individuality, integrity, individual freedom, and free societies, lies in providing people with the skills and capabilities to get over their anger, and experience sincere forgiveness. It is the way the statistics from Stanley Milgram’s experiments on blind obedience to authority get changed. 12 Being Specific About Anger and Forgiveness; excerpts from Practicing Radical Honesty, by Dr. Brad Blanton http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/090611_sqworms_prh-social-contract?mode=a_p 13 Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton, Ph.D. http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/blantonb__prh?mode=a_p 14 Principle 1: ‘All human beings have the fundamental right to an environment adequate for their health and well-being.; Principle 2 (adopted by the UN Commission on Human Rights), provides that all persons ‘have the right to a secure, healthy and ecologically sound environment.’ See Proposed Legal Principles for Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development, adopted by the WCED Experts Group on Environmental Law, reproduced in WCED Our Common Future (1987) 348. See also Principle 1, Draft Principles on Human Rights and the Environment in UN Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities Human Rights and the Environment, Final Report of the Special Rapporteur, UN Doc E/CN.4.Sub2/1994 19 15 Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/blantonb__prh?mode=a_p 16 Opinion of Weeramantry J in the Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia) (1998) 37 International Legal Materials 162 206. http://judgechristopherweeramantry.com/wp/?cat=4 17 See eg Lopez Ostra v Spain (1995) ECHR Ser A 303-C. 18 The Dunning–Kruger effect is the name for the research by Justin Kruger and David Dunning, then from Cornell University. Kruger and Dunning noted earlier studies suggesting that ignorance of standards of performance is behind a great deal of incompetence. This pattern was seen in studies of skills as diverse as reading comprehension, operating a motor vehicle, and playing chess or tennis. They proposed that, for a given skill, incompetent people will: * tend to overestimate their own level of skill; * fail to recognize genuine skill in others; * fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy; * recognize and acknowledge their own previous lack of skill, if they can be trained to substantially improve. Put simply the Dunning & Kruger effect “is a cognitive bias in which an unskilled person makes poor decisions and reaches erroneous conclusions, but their incompetence denies them the metacognitive ability to realize their mistakes.” 19 To Have or to Be, by Erich Fromm: Chapter VII: Religion, Character and Society: The “Marketing Character” and Cybernetic Religion” (pp 133-154) 20 Brene Brown on shame as a psychological fear for transparency, joy and intimacy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4Qm9cGRub0


Honesty SA invites all respondents to liberate themselves from their Flat Earth intellectual, psychological and legal ego prisons of political correctness and denial. [e]

Radical Honesty SA definitions of the word ‘Kaffir’, relevant to this matter: [i] ‘Kaffir Behaviour’: Cultural Beliefs and Procreation Behaviour Definition: Individuals who either independently or as a result of their cultural value systems, are incapable of, or unwilling to, practice sexual restraint and procreation responsibility; who consequently breed cockroach-prolifically without personal financial or psychological responsibility to, or emotional concern for, their offspring; and/or who abuse women and children as sexual or economic slaves procreated for such purpose; and/or whose cultural ideal of manhood endorses non-consensual sex (rape) as their sexual slavery entitlement, etc. [ii] ‘Kaffir Etymology’: Original Etymological Definition for ‘Kaffir’: The word kāfir is the active participle of the Semitic root K-F-R “to cover”. As a preIslamic term it described farmers burying seeds in the ground, covering them with soil while planting; as they till the earth and “cover up” the seeds; which is why earth tillers are referred to as “Kuffar.” Thus, the word kāfir implies the meaning “a person who hides or covers”; To conceal, deny, hide or cover the truth. [iii] ‘Kaffir Legislation’ = Inalienable Right to Breed’ Poverty, Misery and War legislation; pretending it advocates for ‘peace’ and ‘human rights’. Kaffir Law/Legislation provides citizens with the Inalienable ‘Right to Breed’, but demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, etc, etc. Kaffir Legislation covers up that an ‘Inalienable Right to Breed/laissez-faire birth control policy + No Social Welfare policies or practices provides for an equilibrium carrying capacity; whereas Inalienable Right to Breed/laissez-faire birth control within a welfare state, results in Runaway Growth, and ultimately greater misery, poverty and war21.

21 From Shortage to Longage: Forty Years in the Population Vineyards, by Garrett Hardin, Population and Environment, Vol. 12, No. 3. Spring 1991 http://www.garretthardinsociety.org/articles/art_from_shortage_to_longage.html


[2]

[“SANEF SECRECY” REVIEW] A Review of SANEF established SA Press Council and SA Press Appeals Panel administrative procedures, in regards to commitment to transparency, accurate record keeping, scientific journalism and public accountability. 1.

That the SA Press Council is ordered to (A) provide the following documentation to the Constitutional Court, in these proceedings: A.

The Names of all Complainants whose complaints were dismissed by the Ombudsman, prior to any hearing or negotiation with publications; i.e. where the Ombudsman refused to accept their complaint for hearing, for whatever reason, in the following format: a.

Complainants One page summary of their complaint

b.

Ombudsman’s written reasons for dismissal of complaint, without any hearing

c.

If the Ombudsman required the complainant to file a written waiver, prior to informing the complainant of the Ombudsman’s refusal of their complaint; such written waiver.

d.

Where such waiver was required by the Ombudsman, prior to the denial of any hearing, the SA Press Council’s written notification to such complainants that their waiver has been declared null and void by the Press Council, as a result of the refusal by the Ombudsman to provide the complainant with a hearing, regarding their complaint.

B.

The names of all Complainants who filed Applications for Appeal and/or Review to the Press Appeals Panel, whose applications were denied, prior to any Appeal/Review hearing, in the following format: a.

The Complainants Application for Appeal/Review;

b.

The Press Appeals Panel Decision denying the Application for Appeal/Review.

2.

If an impartial analysis of such statistics demonstrates that common SA citizens, who are not members of the SA elite, receive arbitrary, vague, and grossly irregular biased decision making by the Press Ombudsman in favour of SANEF editors and publications; to issue an advisory ruling in support of the establishment of an Impartial Media Appeals Tribunal which conducts its decisionmaking transparently and impartially, in the public interest of all;

3.

Alternatively to [2], to issue an order:


A.

Requiring the Press Council to give all complainants a reference case number; and that all Ombudsman decisions and Press Appeals Panel rulings include reference to such case number.

B.

Requiring the Press Council to publicize the information about all cases filed with the Press Council, including all cases refused a hearing by the Ombudsman, and/or refused appeals by the Press Council Appeals Panel (for past and future decisions), to be made publicly and transparently available on the Press Council website.

4.

In addition to [2] and [3], to issue an advisory ruling, with expert witness input from Wikileaks and/or OpenLeaks ‘scientific journalism’ experts, in support of a clear classification system of ‘media corporations’; similar to Hotel Star Ratings and Smoking Label warnings. For example: (a) Three Star Media Corporations practice unbiased and politically incorrect scientific journalism; (b) Two Star media corporations practice left or right ideological propaganda when it contradicts scientific journalism truths, and withhold from their readers access to the original documents they are reporting their bias upon; (c) One Star gutter yellow smear propaganda journalism, which has no interest whatsoever in scientific truthful reporting, only profiting from spreading gossip and malice. All media corporations are required to publish their ‘scientific journalism’ hierarchical star status, in a designated space on their front page, clarifying their Star Status, and what that start status means regarding the scientific journalism or not quality of factual information being sold to the reader.

[3]

[“SAPA LIES” REVIEW] Review of Press Ombudsman: Joe Thloloe’s ruling22, dated 24 June 2009 denying Johnstone’s complaints23, filed with the SA Press Ombudsman on 11 and 17 June 2009; and issuing the following Orders: 1.

That Ombudsman Thloloe’s denial of Johnstone’s complaint was grossly irregular.

2.

That SAPA’s article fits the Press Code of Conduct description of “serious critical reportage”, which requires that the newspaper should seek the views of the subject; which SAPA did not do; thereby violating the Press Code of Professional Conduct 1.5;

22

Re: Complaint against SAPA http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/090624_sapc-thloloe_sapa-ruling?mode=a_p SAPA alleged guilty of: (I) Erroneous Reporting and Refusal to Impartially Enquiry into Errors, or Correct Erroneous Reporting: (II) Reporting & ‘Credible News’ selection, that is Predisposed to Extreme Bias and Prejudice; and (III) fraudulent representation, of ‘If SAPA knows… South Africa knows…” dated 11 June 2009 http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/090611_complaint-sa-press-ombud_sapa?mode=a_p Additional Evidentiary Relevant Documentation dated 17 June 2009: http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/090617_press-ombuds-sapa-2?mode=a_p

23


3.

Furthermore when SAPA was subsequently provided with the views of Johnstone, including evidentiary information contradicting SAPA’s report; SAPA refused to make an impartial enquiry or to publish Johnstone’s perspective on the subject; thereby again violating the Press Code of Professional Conduct 1.5 and additionally 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.6.

4.

In the absence of SAPA providing the court with evidence for their statements presented to readers as alleged facts of an alleged ‘legal arrest’ and the evidence for the ‘alleged referral for psychiatric observation’ in their report: Woman defies Court over Rude De Lille SMS’s24, SAPA is required to publish the following corrections: A.

SAPA were informed in Request to SAPA: News Article: 19 July 2007: (II) and Honourable Transparency RSA Media Enquiry25, dated 05 June 2009, of the following information, with a request to SAPA to correct the errors in the original article; that: a.

Johnstone was illegally arrested by SAPS Inspector Christian on 18 July 2007, in the absence of any legal valid arrest warrant.

b.

SAPS Inspector Christian lied to Johnstone implying that there were two alleged outstanding arrest warrants, one in Pietermaritzburg and one in Port Elizabeth, which he refused to provide Johnstone with a copy of, to this day.

B.

Johnstone was coerced and forced by the SAPS to see Dr. Theo Dahms. Dr. Theo Dahms refused to provide Johnstone with any of the following documentation, justifying his alleged legal authority to demand she answer any of his questions or the SAPS legal authority to detain her against her will: a.

a copy of the alleged valid arrest warrant authorising her alleged legal arrest on 18 July 2007, and consequent detention;

b.

a copy of any valid documentary evidence proving that she had been legally referred to his office, to answer any questions in accordance to required statutory requirements S 77 – 79 of the Criminal Procedure Act (Accused: Capacity to Understand Proceedings: Mental Illness and Criminal Responsibility) and/or the Criminal Matters Amendment Act, No 68 of 1998; and

24 25

http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Cellular/698.html http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/090624_sapc-thloloe_sapa-ruling?mode=a_p


c.

the required statute that granted Dr. Theo Dahms supreme rule-of-law authority to nullify an accused’s constitutional rights to remain silent, or to refuse to answer questions; granting Dr. Dahms the authority to institutionalize anyone who insists on their constitutional rights as (i) unworthy of such constitutional rights and (ii) worthy of referral for psychological observation.

C.

Johnstone filed a complaint with the National Prosecuting Authority Senior Prosecutor Jacobs [2008-12-28: For the Record: State v. Johnstone: ‘Crimen Injuria’: Incomplete Further Particulars26], wherein she requested the Prosecutor’s Office to provide the alleged legal arrest warrant and the alleged psychological referral documentation; the court irregularly and illegally ignored Johnstone’s complaint.

D.

Neither the SAPS, nor the National Prosecuting Authority, nor the court, nor SAPA, have ever provided any evidence that Johnstone was legally arrested on 18 July 2007, with a valid arrest warrant, or that any legal or valid psychological referral proceedings were ever instigated against Johnstone on 19 July 2007, or at any other time, ever.

[4]

[“ECOLAW OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE” REVIEW] Review of Press Appeals Panel: Judge Ralph Zulman’s ruling27 dated 17 November 2010, denying Lara Johnstone/Radical Honesty SA’s application for appeal28 of Deputy Ombudsman’s 11 October 2010 ruling, wherein the Ombudsman denied Radical Honesty-SA/Lara Johnstone’s 35 complaints of Violations of Press Codes 1.1 (Inaccurate and Unfair by Omission) and 1.2.2 (Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest) in the following articles: [001] 10-09-29: SAPA-Times Live: Citizen fights McBride in Concourt [002] 10-09-29: SAPA-N24: Court to hear McBride ruling appeal [003] 10-09-29: SAPA-Times Live: Citizen takes McBride appeal to Concourt [004] 10-09-30: SAPA-Business Report: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’ [005] 20-09-30: SAPA-IOL: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer [006] 10-09-30: SAPA-Pretoria News: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer [007] 10-09-30: SAPA-Cape Argus: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

26

http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/081228_svj_criminj_snr-pros-inc-parts?mode=a_p Decission (sic): Application for Leave to Appeal: http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/101117_sapap_jzulman-35-ecolaw?mode=a_p 28 Application to Appeal Denial of Hearing by Deputy Ombudsman Johan Retief: Radical Honesty White Refugee 35 Complaint Submissions to SA press Council re: Concourt #23-10 proceedings http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/101011_sapap-appeal_35-ecolaw-justice?mode=a_p 27


[008] 10-09-30: SAPA-SA Star: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer [009] 10-09-30: SAPA-Sunday Ind.: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer [010] 10-09-30: SAPA-Daily News: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer [011] 10-09-30: SAPA-Cape Times: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer [012] 10-09-30: SAPA-Mercury: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer [013] 10-09-30: SAPA-N24: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’ [014] 10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live: McBride murder accusation unfair [015] 10-10-03: SAPA-Daily Dispatch: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’ [016] 10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live: ‘Skeletons’ can be raised in public interest [017] 10-09-30: SAPA-N24: ‘Skeletons’ can be raised in public interest [018] 10-10-01: SAPA-IOL: Court weighs validity of TRC past [019] 10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live: Citizen argues validity of TRC past [020] 10-10-01: SAPA-Cape Times: Court weighs validity of TRC past [021] 10-10-01: SAPA-Cape Argus: Court weighs validity of TRC past [022] 10-10-01: SAPA-Pretoria news: Court weighs validity of TRC past [023] 10-10-01: SAPA-The Mercury: Court weighs validity of TRC past [024] 10-10-01: SAPA-Sunday Tribune: Court weighs validity of TRC past [025] 10-10-01: SAPA-SA Star: Court weighs validity of TRC past [026] 10-10-01: SAPA-ECR-Mobile: McBride Concourt case continues [027] 10-10-01: SAPA-ECR-Newswatch: McBride Concourt case continues [028] 10-10-01: Citizen: Concourt: truth versus law [029] 10-10-01: Mail & Guardian: ‘If I see someone stealing, can I call him a thief?’ [030] 10-10-01: Eyewitness News: McBride lawyer are playing with semantics [031] 10-09-30: TimesLive: When is a Killer not a Killer? [032] 10-10-01: Business Day: Court reserves McBride judgment [033] 10-10-05: Daily Maverick: Analysis: Citizen vs McBride, to remember or not to remember [034] 10-09-30: SAPA-City Press: McBride murderer accusation ‘unfair’ [035] 10-09-30: SAPA-SunInd-IOL: Court weighs validity of TRC past

1.

Declaring

that

the

Deputy

Ombudsman’s

Representation

demand

for

Johnstone/Radical Honesty SA to sign a Waiver, implied a hearing, to hear the defence brought by the publications; and denial by the Ombudsman of such a hearing, renders the Complainants Waiver Null and Void; 2.

Declaring that both Press Appeals Panel: Judge Zulman, and Deputy Ombudsman Johan Retief did not impartially apply their minds with due diligence to the Radical Honesty – SA complaint.

3.

Issuing an order for the relevant publications to publish the following correction, as appropriate: Six Amicus Curiae/Friends of the Court were admitted:

Lara


Johnstone/Radical Honesty; Freedom of Expression Institute (FXI), SA National Editors Forum, Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana and Mbasa Mxenge. 4.

Issuing an order that if or where the media report on any court matters, they are required to abide by international court reporting standards, and are required to fairly and impartially report on all arguments heard by the court in any matter, not only on particular select arguments, and totally censoring other arguments; as detailed in David Ingram and Peter Henshall’s The News Manual29: Chapter 64: The rules of court reporting30: conditions which a report must meet in order to be protected by qualified privilege: It must be fair, accurate and not be actuated by malice: It must be fair If evidence has been given by both prosecution and defence, the report must contain both sides. It is not necessary to report every word that was said, but the overall balance of the court case must be retained in the report. For example, if the prosecution case took twice as long as the defence case, you could fairly devote twothirds of your report to the prosecution evidence and only one-third to the defence evidence. It is essential that a newspaper or broadcasting station which starts to report a court case, continues to do so every day until it is finished. Otherwise the report of the case as a whole cannot be fair, and it will then lose the protection of privilege. It must be accurate It is essential that court reporters do not make mistakes. What the witness says may be quoted, but it must be an accurate quote. Court reporters need good shorthand. Any significant inaccuracy will leave the whole of a report unprotected by privilege. It must not be actuated by malice If the reason you publish or broadcast a court report is to do harm to the defendant that is, you are being malicious - then you can lose the protection of privilege.

[5]

[“CITY PRESS PROPAGANDA” REVIEW] Review of Press Appeals Panel: Judge Ralph Zulman’s ruling dated 24 November 201031, denying Lara Johnstone/Radical Honesty SA’s application for review32: 1.

Issuing an order setting aside Judge Zulman’s ruling dated 24 November, as a result of gross irregularities in the proceedings,

29

http://www.thenewsmanual.net/the_manuals.htm http://www.thenewsmanual.net/Manuals%20Volume%203/volume3_64.htm#fair 31 Decission (sic): Second Application for Leave to Appeal dated 8 November 2010 http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/101123_sapap_jzulman-citypress-ruling?mode=a_p 32 Notice of Application of Review: Review and Set Aside 03 November 2010 Ruling and Retraction, by Dep. Ombudsman Johan Retief: RE: 30-07-2010: Rightwing group tries to scupper Reitz trial, Khadija Bradolow, City Press: referral from SAPS/NPA http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/101104_sapc_appeal_citypress-reits4?mode=a_p 30


2.

Declaring that Judge Zulman’s absence of clear, written reasons clarifying Johnstone’s alleged errors of fact and/or law; demonstrating his fair impartial application of mind to the matters of fact and/or law, was a gross irregularity;

3.

Declaring that Judge Zulman failed to impartially apply his mind to the application request that he recuse himself from hearing the application, if he lacked the intellectual, cultural, political, ideological, and/or legal cognitive capability to apply his mind to make an impartial enquiry into intellectual perspectives held by culture’s, intellectual schools of thought and religions other than the Judge’s own (i.e. such as the Radical Honesty culture).

4.

Declaring that Deputy Ombudsman’s administrative decision-making of issuing33, retracting34 and deleting35 his original ruling, was not done in accordance with due process, and a gross irregularity.

5.

Issuing an order setting aside Deputy Ombudsman Johan Retief’s Revised Ruling36 publicized by email to media on 03 November at 16:09 hrs (uploaded to Press Ombudsman’s website on Nov 04 2010 at 7:34 AM); by issuing an order to reinstate the Finding and Sanction made in the Initial Ruling37, under ‘Not Asked for Comment’, namely: The newspaper made no attempt to ask Johnstone, the subject of the story, for comment. This is in breach of Art. 1.5 of the Press Code that states: “A publication should usually seek the views of serious critical reportage in advance of publication…” Sanction: City Press is reprimanded for not asking Johnstone for comment……

6.

Furthermore, to include in such order of breach of Art. 1.5 the sanction – with related changes to the context – as provided for Mr. Buthelezi in his complaint against the Sowetan38 The Sowetan is directed to ask comment from Buthelezi on this issue and to publish this comment (if Buthelezi indeed wishes to give comment), together with a summary of this finding. If he does not want to comment, the newspaper is directed to publish a retraction of the statement in dispute. Our office should be furnished with the text prior to publication. The newspaper is directed to publish this text on the same page as the article in dispute and to add this text to its website.

7.

Issuing an Order to Set Aside Deputy Ombudsman Johan Retief’s Initial39 and Revised Ruling40 publicized by email to Press Ombudsman website on Nov 03 2010

33

http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/101103_sapc-ruling_rhwr-v-citypress?mode=a_p http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/10-11-04__sapc_ruling-2?mode=a_p 35 http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/101104__sapc_citypress-ruling-1-deleted?mode=a_p 36 http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/10-11-04__sapc_ruling-2?mode=a_p 37 http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/101103_sapc-ruling_rhwr-v-citypress?mode=a_p 38 http://www.presscouncil.org.za/pages/posts/inkatha-freedom-party-vs.-sowetan125.php 34


at 08:43 hrs, publicized by email to Complainant on 03 Nov at 10:49; substituting his finding as follows: A.

Headline:

Rightwing

group

tries

to

scupper

Reitz

trial

were

misrepresentations; an accurate representation could be: ‘Transparency / Radical Honesty group promotes rule of law in Reitz trial’. B.

City Press’s headline misrepresentation significantly altered the context of article.

C.

Correct City Press’s “spitting on culture’s” statement to include deliberate qualifying omission as follows: Radical Honesty accused the media of “spitting on cultures who practice sincere forgiveness and root cause problem solving.”

[6]

[“RH/WR ‘DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE’ DISCLOSURE” REVIEW] A Dunning & Kruger Effect Review of SA Media and Journalists Radical Honesty &/or White Refugee “Rainbow Rule-of-Law Reasonableness”: 1.

Issue an order to all publications whose editors are ‘deliberately indifferent’ to the legal and political persecution and prosecution of ‘Radical Honesty’ (members of Radical Honesty); and/or ‘White Refugees’ (any white South African who considers themselves to being legally or politically persecuted or prosecuted for being white/European); that if or wherever such publication should write any article or editorial that includes any reference to ‘Radical Honesty’ or a member of Radical Honesty culture/religion; or any individual considering themselves a ‘white refugee’, such as Brandon Huntley, or Lara Johnstone, such publication shall include the following public interest transparency disclosure of their conflicts of interest, appended to the bottom of such article: Radical Honesty / White Refugee ‘Deliberate Indifference’ Public Interest Transparency Disclosure of Conflict of Interest by [Publication Name: Editor Name]: Deliberate Indifference: [Editors’ Full Name (Editor, Name of Publication)] is deliberately indifferent to certain people of certain ethnicities and/or ideologies and/or cultures and/or religions being politically and legally persecuted and prosecuted; and you fit one or more of those particular ethnic, ideological, cultural or religious categories, towards whom, [Publication] is deliberately indifferent.”

39 40

http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/101103_sapc-ruling_rhwr-v-citypress?mode=a_p http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/10-11-04__sapc_ruling-2?mode=a_p


[7]

[“‘DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE’ TO MEDIA CORRUPTION DISCLOSURE” REVIEW] A Dunning & Kruger Effect Review of SA Media and Journalists objection to media corruption, and media censorship “Rainbow Rule-of-Law Reasonableness”: 1.

Issuing an order that media publications who endorse the censorship of media corruption, and who report on any alleged political or corporate corruption, to include the following public interest transparency disclosure of their conflicts of interest, appended to the bottom of such article: SA Media “Deliberate Indifference” to Media Corruption Transparency Disclosure of Conflict of Interest by [Publication Name: Editor Name]: Deliberate Indifference to Media Corruption: [Editors’ Full Name (Editor, Name of Publication)] is deliberately indifferent to information about media corruption, in certain instances endorses the censorship of media corruption, and is deliberately indifferent to providing readers with information about root causes problem solving, particularly avoiding the “most potent weapons of war are the penis and the womb”41 root causes of social problems which manifest as violent conflict over resource scarcity or depletion; as described in the Expert Witness Affidavit of (i) Dr. T. Michael Maher42, author of the study How and Why Journalists Avoid Population – Environment connection43; as a result of suffering from intellectual incompetency as described by (ii) Dr. Brad Blanton44, world expert in Radical Honesty About Anger and Forgiveness 45, as filed in the Radical Honesty SA Amicus in Support of a Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, in Concourt #23-10.

TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that the founding affidavit of Lara Johnstone, Member of the Radical Honesty Culture and Religion, filed herewith will be used in support of this application. TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that the Applicant is (a) indigent, and (b) not aware of any public legal aid authority, with the intellectual, cultural, political, ideological, and/or legal cognitive capability to apply their minds to make an impartial enquiry into intellectual perspectives held by culture’s, intellectual schools of thought and religions other than their own (i.e. such as the Radical Honesty culture); however if such public interest legal authority does exist, Applicant has no objection to accepting their public interest litigation 41

“We must all understand that the most potent weapons of war are the penis and the womb. Therefore, if you cannot convince a group to control its population by discussion, debate, intelligent analysis etc., you must consider their action in using the penis and the womb to increase population an act of war.” –-- Jason G. Brent, Attorney and author of Humans: An Endangered Species, as quoted in Boer Volkstaat for African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16 (www.african-white-refugees.co.nr) 42 CCT 23-10: Written Statement by Consent of T. Michael Maher, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness for How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/100522_concourt-expwitness-tmmaher?mode=a_p 43 How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection, by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D. http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/mahertm_journo-env-pop-connection?mode=a_p 44 Written Statement by Consent of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: Practicing Radical Honesty and Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; and Paradigms and Contexts: The Revolution of Consciousness. http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/100518_cc2310_affid-bblanton?mode=a_p 45 Being Specific About Anger and Forgiveness; excerpts from Practicing Radical Honesty, by Dr. Brad Blanton http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/090611_sqworms_prh-social-contract?mode=a_p


support as assistance of counsel. In the absence thereof, Applicant shall be representing herself and her culture/religion (Radical Honesty), as an effective In Forma Pauperis Pro Se / Propria Persona / Litigant in Person Applicant. TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that 16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6539, and/or Email: jmcswan@mweb.co.za, is appointed as the address/email address at which the applicants will accept notice and service of all process in these proceedings. TAKE NOTICE FURTHER: [8]

Respondents are hereby called upon to show cause why the aforementioned Press Council’s Administrative Decisions should not be reviewed and set aside;

[9]

Respondents are hereby called upon to show cause why the Press Council should not practice transparent administrative decision-making, by providing the court and public access to the statistical details of complaints filed with Press Council and denied any hearings, or denied applications for appeal/review;

[10]

Second, Third and Fourth Respondents are hereby required to dispatch to the Concourt Registrar, within 15 (fifteen) days from the receipt of this notice of motion, the record relating to the administrative decisions made by SA Press Council and Press Appeals Panel decision-makers, including all documents (which includes all letters, memoranda, reports, plans, minutes, electronic communications and other materials) before Respondents when the said decisions were made, together with reasons for such decisions and to notify the Applicants that they have done so;

[11]

Relevant Accused and any Interested Respondents are hereby called upon to show cause why all SA Media publications whose editors are ‘deliberately indifferent’ to the legal and political persecution and prosecution of ‘Radical Honesty’ (members of Radical Honesty); and/or ‘White Refugees’ (any white South African who considers themselves to being legally or politically persecuted or prosecuted for being white); should not include the “RH/WR ‘DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE’ DISCLOSURE” caveat appended to the bottom of their article, as a public interest transparency disclosure of their Radical Honesty / White Refugee Rainbow-Rule-of-Law Dunning and Kruger Effect conflicts of interest.

[12]

Relevant Accused and any Interested Respondents are hereby called upon to show cause why all SA media publications who report on any alleged political or corporate corruption, should not include the “‘DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE’ TO MEDIA CORRUPTION DISCLOSURE” caveat appended to the bottom of their article, as a public interest


transparency disclosure of their Deliberate Indifference to Media Corruption Dunning and Kruger Effect conflict of interest. [13]

That the Applicant may within 10 (ten) days after the Registrar has made the aforementioned record available to them, by delivery of a notice and accompanying affidavit, amend, add to or vary the terms of the notice of motion and supplement the supporting affidavits.

TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that should any of the Respondents desire to oppose the granting of the orders prayed for in this notice of motion, they shall: [14]

Within 15 (fifteen) days after receipt of the notice of motion or any amendment thereof, deliver notice to the applicants of their intention to oppose and shall in such notice appoint an individual at which such party will accept notice and service of all process in such proceedings, which shall include the name of an individual responsible for receiving of service documentation by email, including their email address.

[15]

Within 30 (thirty) days after the expiry of the time referred to in sub-rule 53(4) of the Uniform Rules of Court, deliver any affidavits which they may desire in answer to the allegations made by the Applicants.

THE REGISTRAR IS REQUESTED TO KINDLY PLACE THE MATTER BEFORE THE CONCOURT JUSTICES, FOR THEIR APPROPRIATE CONSIDERATION AND RESPONSE. DATED AT GEORGE, ON THIS THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2010

(SGD) L JOHNSTONE Pauperis Propria Persona/ Litigant in Person Per: 16 Taaibos Ave George, 6539 Tel: (044) 870 7239 Cel: (071) 170 1954 Email: jmcswan@mweb.co.za

TO:

CONCOURT REGISTRAR: Registrar of the Constitutional Court: Tel: (011) 359-7400 || Fax: (011) 339-5098 Email: registrar@concourt.org.za CC: Director of the Constitutional Court: Tel: (011) 359 7459 | Fax: (011) 339 5098


Email: director@concourt.org.za

& TO: SA NATIONAL EDITORS FORUM (SANEF) & TO: MR. MONDLI MAKHANYA

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:28 AM46

(First & Second Respondents) Mr. Mondli Makhanya, Chairman South African National Editors Forum (SANEF) 2nd Floor, 7 St David’s Office Park St David’s Place, Parktown Tel 011 484 3630 / 3617 | Fax 011 484 3593 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: SANEF Admin (admin@sanef.org.za), SANEF Executive Director: Ms Femida Mehtar: (director@sanef.org.za), SANEF Chair: Mr. Mondli Makhanya (makhanyam@avusa.co.za), Ms. Makhubele (makhubelem@avusa.co.za)

& TO: SA PRESS COUNCIL: OMBUDSMAN THLOLOE Third Respondent

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:29 AM47

Ombudsman Joe Thloloe SA PRESS COUNCIL 2nd Floor, 7 St. Davids's Park St Davids Place, Parktown, 2193 Tel: (011) 484 3612/8 | Fx: (011) 484 3619 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Press Ombudsman Thloloe (Pressombudsman@ombudsman.org.za); Khanyi Mndaweni (khanyim@ombudsman.org.za)

& TO: SA PRESS APPEALS PANEL JUDGE RALPH ZULMAN Fourth Respondent

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:29 AM48

Judge Ralph Zulman SA PRESS APPEALS PANNEL 2nd Floor, 7 St. Davids's Park St Davids Place, Parktown, 2193 Tel: (011) 484 3612/8 | Fx: (011) 484 3619 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Judge Ralph Zulman (ralphzulman@hotmail.com)

& TO: SA PRESS COUNCIL: DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN RETIEF Fifth Respondent 46

Concourt Concourt Concourt 49 Concourt 47 48

Service Service Service Service

Per Per Per Per

Email: Email: Email: Email:

Resp. Resp. Resp. Resp.

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:29 AM49

#1 & 2: SANEF & M. Makhanya; RE: Writ of Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review #3: Joe Thloloe; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review #4 Judge Ralph Zulman; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review #5 Dep. Omb. Johan Retief; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


Deputy Ombudsman Johan Retief SA PRESS COUNCIL 2nd Floor, 7 St. Davids's Park St Davids Place, Parktown, 2193 Tel: (011) 484 3612/8 | Fx: (011) 484 3619 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Deputy Ombudsman Johan Retief (JohanR@ombudsman.org.za),

& TO: SA PRESS ASSOCIATION (SAPA) & TO: MARK VAN DER VELDEN

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:32 AM50

Sixth and Seventh Respondents Mark van der Velden, Editor SA Press Association (SAPA) P O Box 7766, Johannesburg, 2000 South Africa Tel: (011) 782 1600 | Fx: (011) 782 1587 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: News room (news@sapa.org.za), Editor Mark van der Velden: (mark@sapa.org.za), Sub Editor Hannes de Wet (hannesd@sapa.org.za), CapeNews (capenews@sapa.org.za), Cape Editor Ben Maclennon (ben@sapa.org.za), Russell Norton (russell@sapa.org.za)

& TO: BUSINESS DAY & TO: PETER BRUCE

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:32 AM51

Eighth and Ninth Respondents Mr. Peter Bruce, Editor Business Day P O Box 1746, Saxonwold, 2132 Tel: (011) 280 3091 | Fx: (011) 280 5501 SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Peter Bruce (brucep@bdfm.co.za), News Desk (lathamd@avusa.co.za), Editor Sam Mkokelis (mkokelis@bdfm.co.za)

& TO: BUSINESS REPORT & TO: JABULANI SIKHAKHANE

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:32 AM52

Tenth and Eleventh Respondent Mr. Jabulani Sikhakhane, Editor Business Report 47 Sauer Street, Johannesburg Tel: (011) 633 2484 | Fax: (011) 838 2693 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Jabulani Sikhakhane (editor@businessreport.co.za), (jabulani.sikhakhane@inl.co.za), 50 51 52

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #6 & 7: SAPA & M. van der Velden; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #8 & 9: Business Day & Peter Bruce; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #10 & 11: Business Report & J. Sikhakhane; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


Business Report: (business.report@inl.co.za)

& TO: CAPE ARGUS & TO: CHRIS WITFIELD

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:32 AM53

Twelfth and Thirteenth Respondents Mr. Chris Witfield, Editor Cape Argus P O Box 56, Capetown, 8000 Tel: (021) 488 4911 | Fx: (021) 488 4156 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Chris Witfield (chris.whitfield@inl.co.za), Lindiz Van Zilla (lindiz.vanzilla@inl.co.za), Lyntina Aimes (lyntina.aimes@inl.co.za) , Gasant Abarder (gasant.abarder@inl.co.za), Andisiwe Makinana (andisiwe.makinana@inl.co.za), Sue Visser (sue.visser@inl.co.za),

& TO: CAPE TIMES & TO: ALIDE DASNOIS

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:32 AM54

Fourteenth and Fifteenth Respondents Ms. Alide Dasnois, Editor Cape Times Newspaper House, 4th Floor 122 St. Georges Mall, Capetown Tel: (021) 488 4911 | Fx: (021) 488 4717 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Alide Dasnois (alide.dasnois@inl.co.za), Ella Smook (ella.smook@inl.co.za), Di Caelers (di.caelers@inl.co.za), Nina Talliard (nina.talliard@inl.co.za)

& TO: CITY PRESS & TO: FERIAL HAFFAJEE

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:32 AM55

Sixteenth and Seventeenth Respondents Ms. Ferial Haffajee, Editor City Press Media Park, 69 Kingsway Auckland Park, Jhb Tel: (011) 713 9001 | Fx: (011) 713 9966 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Ferial Haffajee (ferial.haffajee@citypress.co.za), G. Edmunds (GEdmunds@citypress.co.za), Liesl Pretorius 53 54 55

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #12 & 13: CAPE ARGUS & C WITFIELD; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #14 & 15: CAPE TIMES & A. DASNOIS; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #16 & 17: CITY PRESS & F. HAFFAJEE; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


(liesl.pretorius@citypress.co.za), Trevor Neethling (news@citypress.co.za), N. Naca (nnaca@citypress.co.za), Amos Mananyetso (amananye@citypress.co.za),

& TO: THE CITIZEN & TO: MARTIN WILLIAMS

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:32 AM56

Eighteenth and Nineteenth Respondents Mr. Martin Williams, Editor The Citizen P O Box 43069, Industria, Jhb, 2042 Tel: (011) 248 6000 | Fx: (011) 248 6213 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Martin Williams (martinw@citizen.co.za), Deputy Editor Michael Coetzee (michaelc@citizen.co.za), (citizensub@gmail.com), Puleng M (pulengm@citizen.co.za), Citizen News Bureau (news@citizen.co.za), Bureau Chief Pretoria Office Kim Helfrick (kimh@citizen.co.za),

& TO: DAILY DISPATCH & TO: ANDREW TRENCH

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:41 AM57

Twentieth and Twenty-First Respondents Andrew Trench, Editor The Daily Dispatch P O Box 131, East London, 5200 Tel: (043) 702 2000 | Fx: (043) 743 5155 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Ed. Coordinator - Samantha (news@dispatch.co.za), Investigations Editor Mr. Eddie Botha (eddieb@dispatch.co.za), Robin Ross-Thompson (robinrt@dispatch.co.za), Theodore Jephta (theodorej@dispatch.co.za), Thanduxolo Jika: (thanduxoloj@dispatch.co.za) , Andrew Trench (andrewt@dispatch.co.za), Deputy Editor Bongani Siqoko (bonganis@dispatch.co.za), Mthatha Bureau Mr. Lubabalo Ngcukana (lubabalon@dispatch.co.za), Louise Flanagan (louisef@dispatch.co.za)

& TO: DAILY MAVERICK & TO: BRKIC BRANKO

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:42 AM58

Twenty-Second and Twenty-Third Respondents Brkic Branko, Editor The Daily Maverick 1st Floor, Building 3, Albury Park 56 57 58

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #18 & 19: THE CITIZEN & M. WILLIAMS; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #20 & 21: DAILY DISPATCH & A. TRENCH; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #22 & 23: DAILY MAVERICK & B. BRANKO; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


Corner Jan Smuts & Albury Rd, Hyde Park Cell: (084) 444 8700 | (083) 414 2983 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Brkic Branko (Branko@thedailymaverick.co.za), Deputy Editor Philip de Wet (phillip@thedailymaverick.co.za); Transparency Mandy de Waal (mandy@dailymaverick.co.za); Brendah Nyakudya (brendah@dailymaverick.co.za); Jacques Rosseau (jacques@dailymaverick.co.za); Ivo Veger (ivo@dailymaverick.co.za); Stephen Grootes (stephen@dailymaverick.co.za); Brooks Spector (brooks@dailymaverick.com), Newsroom: (news@thedailymaverick.co.za).

& TO: DAILY NEWS & TO: ALAN DUNN

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:42 AM59

Twenty-Fourth and Twenty-Fifth Respondents Alan Dunn, Editor The Daily News Independent Newspapers 18 Osborne Street, Greyville, Dbn Tel: (031) 308 2911 | Fx: (031) 308 2111 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor Alan Dunn (alan.dunn@inl.co.za), Editor Secretary Debbie Yunnie (Debbie.yunnie@inl.co.za)

& TO: EAST COAST RADIO & TO: DIANE MACPHERSON

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:42 AM60

Twenty-Sixth and Twenty-Seventh Respondents Diane Macpherson, Editor East Coast Radio 313-315 Umhlanga Rocks Drive, Umhlanga Rocks, Durban Tel: (031) 570 9495 | Fx: (086) 679 4951 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: News Editor Diane Macpherson (diane@ecr.co.za), Online Editor Charis Apelgren (charis@ecr.co.za)

& TO: EYEWITNESS NEWS & TO KATY KATAPODIS

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:42 AM61

Twenty-Eighth and Twenty-Ninth Respondents Katy Katapodis, Editor 59 60 61

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #24 & 25: DAILY NEWS & A. DUNN; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #26 & 27: ECR & D. MACPHERSON; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #28 & 29: EYEWITNESS NEWS & K. KATAPODIS; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


Eyewitness News Primedia House, 2nd Floor 5 Gwen Lane (cnr Gwen Lane & Fredman Dr) Sandown Tel: (011) 506 3702 | Fx (086) 501 2014 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Eyewitness News Editor Katy Katapodis (katy@702.co.za), (editor@ewn.co.za), Eyewitness News (news@ewn.co.za), Webmaster (webmaster@ewn.co.za)

& TO: INDEPENDENT ONLINE & TO: ADRIAN EPHRAIM

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 2:26 AM62

Thirtieth and Thirty-First Respondents Adrian Ephraim, Editor Independent Online The Star Building 47 Sauer Street, Jhb, 2001 Tel: (011) 633 9111 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor Adrian Ephraim (adrian.ephraim@inl.co.za), Aeysha Kassiem (aeysha.kassiem@inl.co.za), Karen Breytenbach (karen.breytenbach@inl.co.za), Craig McKune (craig.mckune@inl.co.za), Jason Warner (jason.warner@inl.co.za), Anel Powell (anel.powell@inl.co.za), Sharika Regchand (sharika.regchand@inl.co.za),

& TO: MAIL AND GUARDIAN & TO: NIC DAWES

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:48 AM63

Thirty-Second and Thirty-Third Respondents Nic Dawes, Editor Mail and Guardian P O Box 91667, Auckland Park, Jhb 2006 Tel: (011) 250 7300 | Fx: (011) 250 7502 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor Matthew Burbidge (matthewb@mg.co.za), Editor Keith Nichols (keithn@mg.co.za), Editor Nic Dawes (nicd@mg.co.za), News Desk (newsdesk@mg.co.za), Stefaans Brummer (stefaansb@mg.co.za), Verashni Pillay (verashnip@mg.co.za), Newsdesk: Drew Forrest (drewf@mg.co.za), Features: Tanya Pamplone (tanyap@mg.co.za), Dep. Editor: Rapule Tabane (rapulet@mg.co.za), Editor Pers. Asst. Wendy Mosetlhi (wendym@mg.co.za)

62 63

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #30 & 31: IOL & ADRIAN EPHRAM; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #32 & 33: M&G & NIC DAWES; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


& TO: THE MERCURY & TO: ANGELA QUINTAL

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:48 AM64

Thirty-Fourth and Thirty-Fifth Respondents Angela Quintal, Editor The Mercury Independent Newspapers, 18 Osborne St., Greyville, Durban Tel: (031) 308 2911 | Fx: (031) 308 2333 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Angela Quintal (angela.quintal@inl.co.za), Mercury News (mercnews@inl.co.za)

& TO: NEWS 24 & TO: JANNIE MOMBERG

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:48 AM65

Thirty-Sixth and Thirty-Seventh Respondents Jannie Momberg News 24 70 Prestwich St, Green Point, 8005 Tel: (021) 468 8000/8073 | Fx: (021) 468 8200 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Jannie Momberg (jannie.momberg@sa.24.com) , Media 24 Ondersoeke (ondersoeke@media24.com), Llewellyn Prince (Llewellyn.prince@media24.com), Jannie Momberg Secretary Lameezah Hendricks (lameezah.hendricks@sa.24.com)

& TO: PRETORIA NEWS & TO: ZINGISA MKHUMA

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:48 AM66

Thirty-Eighth and Thirty-Ninth Respondents Zingisa Mkhuman, Editor Pretoria Newspapers Holdings Ltd 216 Vermeulen Street, Pretoria Tel: (012) 300 2000 | Fx: (012) 328 7166 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Zingisa Mkhuma (zingisa.mkhuma@inl.co.za), Graeme Hosken (graeme.hosken@inl.co.za), Assistant Editor Steven Mathale (steven.mathale@inl.co.za), Assist Editor Jos Chale (jos.chale@inl.co.za);

& TO: SA STAR & TO: MOEGSIEN WILLIAMS 64 65 66

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:48 AM67

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #34 & 35: THE MERCURY & A. QUINTAL; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #36 & 37: NEWS 24 & J. MOMBERG; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #38 & 39: PRETORIA NEWS & Z. MKHUMA; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


Fortieth and Forty-First Respondents Moegsien Williams, Editor SA Star 47 Sauer Street, Johannesburg Tel: (011) 633 2410 / 9111 | Fax: (011) 836 6186 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Moegsien Williams (moegsien.williams@inl.co.za), Deputy Editor Jovial Rantao (jovial.rantao@inl.co.za), Admin Vidette Aslett (vidette.aslett@inl.co.za), StarNews (starnews@inl.co.za)

& TO: SUNDAY INDEPENDENT & TO: MAKHUDU SEFARA

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:53 AM68

Forty-Second and Forty-Third Respondents Makhudu Sefara, Editor Sunday Independent 47 Sauer Street, Johannesburg Tel: (011) 633 9111 | Fx: (011) 834 7520 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Makhudu Sefara (makhudu.sefara@inl.co.za); Editor Makhudu Sefara Secretary Jennifer Johnson (jennifer.johnson@inl.co.za), Deputy Editor Andrew Walker (andrew.walker@inl.co.za), Tony Carnie (carnie@nn.independent.co.za), Venilla Yoganatha (venilla@nn.independent.co.za), Paddy Harper (harper@nn.independent.co.za), Chris Jenkins (jenkins@nn.independent.co.za), Jill Gowans (gowans@nn.independent.co.za), Farhana Ismail (farhana@nn.independent.co.za)

& TO: SUNDAY TRIBUNE & TO: PHILANI MGWABA

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:54 AM69

Forty-Fourth and Forty-Fifth Respondents Philani Mgwaba, Editor Sunday Tribune P O Box 47549 Greyville, 4023 Tel: (031) 308 2771 | Fx: (031) 308 2357 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Philani Mgwaba (philani.mgwaba@inl.co.za), News Editor Liz Clarke (liz.clarke@inl.co.za), Tribune News (tribunenews@inl.co.za)

& TO: TIMES LIVE (SUNDAY TIMES)

67 68 69

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:54

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #40 & 41: SA STAR & M. WILLIAMS; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #42 & 43: SUNDAY IND. & M. SEFARA; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #44 & 45: SUNDAY TRIBUNE & P MGWABA; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


AM70

& TO: RAY HARTLEY Fourty-Sixth and Forty-Seventh Respondents Avusa House, 4 Bierman Avenue Rosebank, Johannesburg Tel: (011) 280 3000 | Fx: (011) 280 5150 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Editor: Ray Hartley (hartleyr@sundatimes.co.za), News Editor Jessica Bezuidenhout (bezuidenhoutj@sundaytimes.co.za), News Editor Heather Robertson (robertsonh@sundaytimes.co.za), Sunday Times (suntimes@sundaytimes.co.za), Justice Malala (malalaj@sundatimes.co.za), Kim Hawkeye (hawkeyk@sundaytimes.co.za)

& TO: 3RD DEGREE & TO: DEBORAH PATTA

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:54 AM71

Forty-Eighth and Forty-Ninth Respondents Ms Debora Patta 3RD Degree: Executive Producer PO Box 12124, Mill Street Gardens, CAPE TOWN, 8010 Tel: (021) 481 4500 | Fax: (021) 481 4630 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: News Room (newsroom@etv.co.za), Ms. Deborah Patta (deborap@etv.co.za), ETV (info@etv.co.za), 3rd Degree (3rddegree@etv.co.za), Kirsty Blackford (kirstyb@etv.co.za), info@etv.co.za, etvnewsP@iafrica.com, etvnewsJ@iafrica.com, webmaster@etv.co.za,

& TO: BEELD & TO: TIM DU PLESSIS

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:54 AM72

Fiftieth and Fifty-First Respondents Mr Tim Du Plessis Editor: Beeld PO Box 333, Auckland Park, 2006 Tel: (011) 713 9000 | Fax: (011) 713 9956 / 7 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Beeld Editor: Tim du Plessis (timdup@beeld.com), Nuus (nuus@beeld.com), Letters (briewe@beeld.com), Marietjie Louw (mlouw1@beeld.com), AA Pienaar (aapienaar@beeld.com), Daniela du Plooy (gogga_vlooi@hotmail.com), J. Prins (jprins@beeld.com), Pieter du Toit (pdutoit@beeld.com), Beeld Pta Ms. Nicoleze Mulder (pretoria@beeld.com) 70 71 72

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #46 & 47: TIMES LIVE & R. HARTLEY; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #48 & 49: ETV & D. PATTA; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #50 & 51: BEELD & T. DU PLESSIS; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


& TO: DAILY SUN & TO: THEMBA KHUMALO

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:59 AM73

Fifty-Second and Fifty-Third Respondents Mr Themba Khumalo Editor: Daily Sun PO Box 121, Auckland Park, 2006 Tel: (011) 877 6000 | Fax: (011) 877 6020 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Themba Khumalo (tkhumalo@dailysun.co.za), News Daily Sun (news@dailysun.co.za) , R. Devenish (rdevenish@dailysun.co.za)

& TO: DIE BURGER & TO: HENRY JEFFERY

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:59 AM74

& TO: BUN BOOYSENS Fifty-Fourth, Fifty-Fifth & Fifty-Sixth Respondents Mr. Bun Booysens Editor: Die Burger PO Box 692, Capetown, 8000 Tel: (021) 406 2121 | Fax: (021) 406 3965 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: East (oos@dieburger.com) , Willem Jordaan (wjordaan@dieburger.com), Chantel Cox (chantel.cox@dieburger.com), De Waal Steyn dsteyn1@dieburger.com, Redaksie (sknuus@dieburger.com), Redakteur Jo-Ann Floris (jfloris@dieburger.com), Ass. Redakteur Mariska Spoormaker (mspoormaker@dieburger.com), J Pienaar (jpienaar@dieburger.com), Annemarie de Laura (adelaura@dieburger.com), Die Burger Journalists (mlavita@dieburger.com), (diens@dieburger.com), (nuus@dieburger.com), (web@dieburger.com), (oos@dieburger.com), (dbmening@dieburger.com), (oos@dieburger.com), Editor: Bun Booysen (bbooysen@dieburger.com),

& TO: E-NEWS & TO: PATRICK CONROY

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:59 AM75

Fifty-Seventh and Fifty-Eight Respondents Mr. Patrick Conroy ETV: Head of E-News 73

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #52 & 53: DAILY SUN & T. KHUMALO; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #54, 55 & 56: DIE BURGER, B. BOOYSEN & J. JEFFERY; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review 75 Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #57 & 58: E-NEWS & P. CONROY; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review 74


PO Box 12124, Mill Street Gardens, CAPE TOWN, 8010 Tel: (021) 481 4500 Fax: (021) 481 4630 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: News room: (newsroom@etv.co.za), Patrick Conroy (Patrick.Conroy@etv.co.za), Zanile Madikane (Zanele.Madikane@etv.co.za), Bongi Potelwa (bongi.potelwa@etv.co.za), Gill Scholtz (Gill.Scholtz@etv.co.za)

& TO: FINANCIAL MAIL & TO: BARNEY MTHOMBOTHI

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 12:59 AM76

Fifty-Ninth and Sixtieth Respondents Mr Barney Mthombothi Editor: Financial Mail P O Box 1744 Saxonwold, 2132 Tel: (011) 280 5808 Fax: (011) 280 5800 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Barney Mthombothi (mthombothib@fm.co.za), David Furlonger (furlongerd@fm.co.za), Financial Mail (fmmail@fm.co.za), FM Mad Focus (fmadfocus@fm.co.za), Rob Rose (RoseR@fm.co.za), Onica Buthelezi (buthelezio@fm.co.za), Financial Mail (fmdidu@fm.co.za), Thandeka Gqubule (gqubulet@fm.co.za), FM Western Cape (pilej@fm.co.za)

& TO: FINWEEK & TO: COLLEEN NAUDE

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:03 AM77

Sixty-First and Sixty-Second Respondents Ms Colleen Naude Editor: Finweek PO Box 786466, Sandton, 2146 Tel: (011) 263 4700 Fax: (011) 884 0851 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Rikus Delport (rikusd@finweek.co.za), Colleen Naude (colleen.naude@gmail.com), Tian Libenberg (tianl@finweek.co.za), Tony Koenderman (tonyk@finweek.co.za), Sikonathi Mantshantsha (sikonathim@finweek.co.za), (colleenn@finweek.co.za)

76 77

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #59 & 60: FINANCIAL MAIL & B. MTHOMBOTHI; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #61 & 62: FINWEEK & COLLEEN NAUDE; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


& TO: THE GEORGE HERALD & TO: MANDI BOTHA

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:03 AM78

Sixty-Third and Sixty-Fourth Respondents Ms. Mandi Botha Editor: George Herald PO Box 806, George, 6539 Tel: (044) 874 2424 Fax: (044) 874 1393 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Mandi Botha (mandi@groupeditors.co.za), George News (grjnews@ctpmail.co.za), Pauline Lourens (paulinel@groupeditors.co.za), Lindie Joubert (lindie@groupeditors.co.za), Shirley Coetzee (shirley@groupeditors.co.za), Lo-An Nel Breytenbach (loannel@groupeditors.co.za), Suzette Herrer (mba@groupeditors.co.za), Lucinda Viljoen (lucinda@ctpmail.co.za), Melissa Hulls (melissa@groupeditors.co.za), Lizette da Silva (lizette@groupeditors.co.za), Michelle Pienaar (michelle@groupeditors.co.za), Ilse Schoonraad (ilse@groupeditors.co.za), Jannie Meyer (jannie@groupeditors.co.za), Anica Kruger (anica@groupeditors.co.za), Yvonne Botha (yvonne@groupeditors.co.za) , Mr. Steyn (mielies@ctpmail.co.za)

& TO: INDEPENDENT ON SATURDAY & TO: TREVOR BRUCE

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:03 AM79

Sixty-Fifth and Sixty-Sixth Respondents Mr. Trevor Bruce News Editor: Independent on Saturday PO Box 47549, Greyville, 4023 Tel: (031) 308 2934 / 2381 Fax: (031) 308 2111 / 2185 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Trevor Bruce (trevor.bruce@inl.co.za), Luvoyo Mjekula (luvuyo.mjekula@inl.co.za) Philani Mgwaba (philani.mgwaba@inl.co.za), Quinton Mtyala (quinton.mtyala@inl.co.za) , Greg Arde (greg.arde@inl.co.za)

& TO: RADIO 702 & TO: PHELADI GWANGWA

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:03 AM80

Sixty-Seventh and Sixty-Eighty Respondents 78 79 80

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #63 & 64: GEORGE HERALD & MANDI BOTHA; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #65 & 66: IND. ON SAT. & T. BRUCE; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #67 & 68: RADIO 702 & P. GWANGWA; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


Ms Pheladi Gwangwa Station Manager: 702 Radio PO Box 5572, Rivonia, 2128 Tel: (011) 506 3702 | Fax: (011) 506 3670 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Pheladi Gwangwa (pheladi@702.co.za), (pheladi@primedia.co.za), News (news@702.co.za), 702 Eyewitness News (news@ewn.co.za), Bruce Whitfield (brucew@702.co.za), Kieno Kammies (kieno@702.co.za), Robin Clark (robin@capetalk.co.za), John Robbie (johnr@702.co.za), Lynne O’Connor (lynne@702.co.za), David O’Sullivan (david@702.co.za), Chris Gibbons (Chrisbig@capetalk.co.za)

& TO: RAPPORT & TO: LISA ALBRECHT

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:03 AM81

Sixty-Ninth and Seventieth Respondents Ms. Liza Albrecht Editor: Rapport PO Box 8422, Johannesburg, 2000 Tel: (011) 713 9628 Fax: (011) 713 9977 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Liza Albrecht (liza.albrecht@rapport.co.za), Ombudsman (ombudsman@rapport.co.za), Letters (briewe@rapport.co.za), Rapport (rapport@rapport.co.za), Herman Jansen (hjansen@rapport.co.za), Colin Hendricks (colin.hendricks@rapport.co.za), E, van Wyk (evanwyk@rapport.co.za), K Burger (kburger@rapport.co.za), M Malan (mmalan@rapport.co.za), W. Pelser (wpelser@rapport.co.za), C. Nel (cnel@rapport.co.za), Carien Kruger (carien.kruger@rapport.co.za), Jamey Thomas (Jamey.thomas@rapport.co.za), Henry Cloete (henry.cloete@rapport.co.za), P Malan (pmalan@rapport.co.za), Etricia Kraft (etricia.kraft@rapport.co.za), Jacob Rooi (JRooi@rapport.co.za)

& TO: SATURDAY STAR & TO: BRENDAN SEERY

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:11 AM82

Seventy-First and Seventy-Second Respondents Mr. Brendan Seery Executive Editor: Saturday Star PO Box 1014, Johannesburg, 2000 Tel: (011) 633 2792 | Fax: (011) 633 2794 / 838 3019 81 82

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #69 & 70: RAPPORT & L. ALBRECHT; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #71 & 72: SAT. STAR & B. SEERY; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Star News (starnews@inl.co.za), Brendan Seery (brendan.seery@inl.co.za), Thandi Mabuza (Thandi.Mabuza@inl.co.za), Anel Lewis (anel.lewis@inl.co.za), Quinton Mtyala (Quinton.mtyala@inl.co.za), Mthunzi Mbatha (mthunzi.mbatha@inl.co.za)

& TO: SOWETAN & TO: BONGANI KESWA

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:11 AM83

Seventy-Third and Seventy-Fourth Respondents Mr. Bongani Keswa Editor In Chief: Sowetan PO Box 6663, Johannesburg, 2000 Tel: (011) 471 4000 | Fax: (011) 474 8834 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Bongani Keswa (keswab@sowetan.co.za), Editor – Sowetan (editor@sowetan.co.za), Lorraine Mofokeng (lorrainem@sowetan.co.za), Thuli Zungu (zungut@sowetan.co.za), Edward Tsumele (Tsumelee@sowetan.co.za)

& TO: THE HERALD & TO: JEREMY MCCABE

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:11 AM84

Seventy-Fifth and Seventy-Sixth Respondents Mr Jeremy McCabe Editor in Chief: The Herald Private Bag X 6071, Port Elizabeth, 6000 Tel: (041) 504 7911 Fax: (041) 585 4966 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAILl: Jeremy McCabe (McCabej@avusa.co.za), The Herald (theherald@avusa.co.za), L Makungan (makungan@avusa.co.za), Avusa (care@avusa.co.za), Estelle Kerrane (kerranee@avusa.co.za), Shawn M (shawnm@avusa.co.za), Circulation Manager (circmanager@avusa.co.za), Avusa Group Secretary Joanne Matisonn (matisonnj@avusa.co.za)

& TO: VOLKSBLAD & TO: AINSLEY MOOS

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:11 AM85

Seventy-Seventh and Seventy-Eighth Respondents Mr. Ainsley Moos 83 84 85

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #73 & 74: SOWETAN & B. KESWA; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #75 & 76: THE HERALD & J. MCCABE; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #77 & 78: VOLKSBLAD & A. MOOS; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


Editor: Volksblad PO Box 267, Bloemfontein, 9300 Tel: (051) 404 7600 Fax: (051) 430 6949 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Ainsley Moos (amoos@volksblad.com), Nuus (nuus@volksblad.com), Mike van Rooyen (mvanrooyen@volksblad.com), Christo Van Staden (cvanstaden@volksblad.com), Hannetjie Van der Merwe (hvanderm@volksblad.com), Adri Herbert (aherbert@volksblad.com), Leatitia Pienaar (lpienaar@volksblad.com), Tom de Wet (tdewet@volksblad.com)

& TO: ROD AMNER Seventy-Ninth Respondent

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:11 AM86

Prof. Rod Amner Rhodes School of Journalism and Media Studies Africa Media Matrix building Upper Prince Alfred Street Grahamstown, 6139 Tel: 046 603 7100 Fax: 046 603 7101 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Email: Rod Amner (r.amner@ru.ac.za), Rhodes Journalism (journqueries@ru.ac.za), (registrar@ru.ac.za), Prof. Anthea Garman (a.garman@ru.ac.za), Nicky Cocroft (n.cockcroft@ru.ac.za), Simon Pamphilon (s.pamphilon@ru.ac.za), Simwogerere Kyazze (s.kyazze@ru.ac.za)

& TO: ROBERT BRAND Eightieth Respondent

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:18 AM87

Prof. Robert Brand Pearson Chair of Economics Journalism Rhodes School of Journalism and Media Studies Africa Media Matrix building Upper Prince Alfred Street Grahamstown, 6139 Tel: 046 603 7100 Fax: 046 603 7101 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Email: Robert Brand (r.brand@ru.ac.za), Rhodes Journalism (journqueries@ru.ac.za), (registrar@ru.ac.za), Prof. Herman Wasserman (h.wasserman@ru.ac.za), Prof. Jeanne Prinsloo (j.prinsloo@ru.ac.za), Prof. Larry Strelitz (l.strelitz@ru.ac.za) 86 87

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #79: PROF. ROD AMNER; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #80: PROF. ROBERT BRAND; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


& TO: GUY BERGER Eighty-First Respondent

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:18 AM88

Prof. Guy Berger Head of School Rhodes School of Journalism and Media Studies Africa Media Matrix building Upper Prince Alfred Street Grahamstown, 6139 Tel: 046 603 7100 Fax: 046 603 7101 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Email: Guy Berger (g.berger@ru.ac.za), Rhodes Journalism (journqueries@ru.ac.za), (registrar@ru.ac.za), Dr. Lynette Steenveld (l.steenveld@ru.ac.za), Priscilla Boshoff (p.boshoff@ru.ac.za), Reg Rumney (r.rumney@ru.ac.za)

& TO: HARRY DUGMORE Eighty-Second Respondent

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:18 AM89

Prof. Harry Dugmore MTN Chair of Media and Mobile Communication Rhodes School of Journalism and Media Studies Africa Media Matrix building Upper Prince Alfred Street Grahamstown, 6139 Tel: 046 603 7100 Fax: 046 603 7101 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Email: Harry Dugmore (h.dugmore@ru.ac.za), Rhodes Journalism (journqueries@ru.ac.za), (registrar@ru.ac.za); Jude Mathurine (j.mathurine@ru.ac.za), Khaya Thonjeni (k.thonjeni@ru.ac.za)

& TO: HAROLD GESS Eighty-Third Respondent

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:18 AM90

Lecturer Harold Gess Rhodes School of Journalism and Media Studies Africa Media Matrix building Upper Prince Alfred Street Grahamstown, 6139 Tel: 046 603 7100 Fax: 046 603 7101 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Email: Harold Gess (h.gess@ru.ac.za) , Rhodes Journalism (journqueries@ru.ac.za), (registrar@ru.ac.za), Jenny Gordon (j.gordon@ru.ac.za), Paul

88 89 90

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #81: PROF. GUY BERGER; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #82: PROF. HARRY DUGMORE; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #83: PROF. HAROLD GESS; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


Greenway (p.greenway@ru.ac.za)

& TO: JANE DUNCAN Eighty-Fourth Respondent

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:18 AM91

Professor Jane Duncan Highway Africa Chair of Media and Information Society Rhodes School of Journalism and Media Studies Africa Media Matrix building Upper Prince Alfred Street Grahamstown, 6139 Tel: 046 603 7100 Fax: 046 603 7101 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Email: Jane Duncan (jane.duncan@ru.ac.za), Rhodes Journalism (journqueries@ru.ac.za), (registrar@ru.ac.za), Chris Kabwato (c.kabwato@ru.ac.za), Luthando Kiti (l.kiti@ru.ac.za), Moagisi Letlhaku (m.lethlaku@ru.ac.za), Nqobile Buthelezi (n.buthelezi@ru.ac.za), Sibusiso Mtshali (s.mtshali@ru.ac.za)

& TO: ANTON HARBER Eighty-Fifth Respondent

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:18 AM92

Professor Anton Harber Professor - Journalism and Media Studies Wits Journalism University of the Witwatersrand 1 Jan Smuts Avenue Braamfontein 2000 Johannesburg Tel: (011) 717 4028 Fax: 011 717 4081 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Email: Anton Harber (anton@harber.co.za), Big Media Sally (sallyannn@bigmedia.co.za), Wits Journalism (editor@journalism.co.za), (journinfo@wits.ac.za)

& TO: FRANZ KRUGER Eighty-Sixth Respondent

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:18 AM93

Professor Franz Kruger Senior lecturer in Journalism Wits Journalism University of the Witwatersrand 1 Jan Smuts Avenue Braamfontein 2000 Johannesburg 91 92 93

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #84: PROF. JANE DUNCAN; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #85: PROF. ANTON HARBER; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #86: PROF. FRANZ KRUGER; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


Tel: (011) 717 4028 Fax: 011 717 4081 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Email: Franz Kruger (franz.kruger@wits.ac.za), Wits Journalism

(pumla.ngcoco@wits.ac.za), (editor@journalism.co.za), (journinfo@wits.ac.za)

& TO: WILLIAM BIRD Eighty-Seventh Respondent

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:18 AM94

William Bird Director & Ashoka Fellow Media Monitoring Africa Suite no.2, 22 Art Centre 6th Street Parkhurst (Johannesburg) Tel: +27 (0) 11 788 1278 Fax: +27 (0) 11 788 1289 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Email: William Bird (williamb@mma.org.za), (info@mma.org.za), Sandra Roberts (Sandrar@mma.org.za), William Bird (williamb@mediamonitoring.org.za), George Kalu (georgek@mediamonitoring.org.za), Media Monitoring (info@mediamonitoring.org.za), Laura Fletcher (lauraf@mma.org.za), Prinola Govenden (prinolag@mma.org.za)

& TO: PROJOURN STEERING COMMITTEE Eighty-Eighth Respondent

Served on: Mon 1/3/2011 1:27 AM95

PROJOURN Steering Committee c/o: Michael Schmidt Exec. Director: Institute for the Advancement of Journalism 9 Jubilee Road Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193 Tel: +27 11 484 1765/6/7 Fax: +27 11 484 2282 ECOLAW SERVICE PER EMAIL: Steering Committee General Secretary: Samantha Perry (samantha.perry@gmail.com); Michael Schmidt: Steering Committee Admin Secretary (mschmidt@frayintermedia.com), (info@iaj.org.za); Steering Committee: Barry Bateman (barry.bateman@inl.co.za); Beauregard Tromp (tromp@inl.co.za); Michael Coetzee (cicero@wbs.co.za); Greg Gordon (gregg@is.co.za); Ray Joseph (rayjoe@iafrica.com); Monica Laganparsad (laganparsadm@sundaytimes.co.za); Ebrahim Moolla (ebrahim@fhm.co.za); Sholain Govender-Bateman (sholain@webmail.co.za); Antoinette Lazarus (lazarusal@sabc.co.za); Mandy de Waal (mandyd@mweb.co.za); 94 95

Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #87: WILLIAM BIRD, MMA; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review Concourt Service Per Email: Resp. #88: PROJOURN STEERING COMM.; RE: Writ for Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review


Jan Hennop (JanH@dispatch.co.za); Cobus Bester (besterc@sabc.co.za); Subry Govender (ptsa@global.co.za); Justin Arenstein (editor@africanpress.com); Jedi Ramalapa (jedi.ramalapa@gmail.com); Anso Thom (anso@healthe.org.za); Billings Siwila (billingsmovies@gmail.com); Matuba Mahlatjie (matubaster@gmail.com)

11-01-03: Concourt: Notice of Motion: Application for Writ of Habeus Mentem and Certiorari  

11-01-03: Concourt: Notice of Motion: Application for Writ of Habeus Mentem and Certiorari

Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you