Page 1

[A] Publications & Dates: [001] [002] [003] [004] [005] [006] [007] [008] [009] [010] [011] [012] [013] [014] [015] [016] [017] [018] [019] [020] [021] [022] [023] [024] [025] [026] [027] [028] [029] [030] [031] [032] [033] [034] [035]

10-09-29: SAPA-Times Live: Citizen fights McBride in Concourt 10-09-29: SAPA-N24: Court to hear McBride ruling appeal 10-09-29: SAPA-Times Live: Citizen takes McBride appeal to Concourt 10-09-30: SAPA-Business Report: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’ 20-09-30: SAPA-IOL: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer 10-09-30: SAPA-Pretoria News: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer 10-09-30: SAPA-Cape Argus: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer 10-09-30: SAPA-SA Star: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer 10-09-30: SAPA-Sunday Ind.: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer 10-09-30: SAPA-Daily News: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer 10-09-30: SAPA-Cape Times: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer 10-09-30: SAPA-Mercury: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer 10-09-30: SAPA-N24: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’ 10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live: McBride murder accusation unfair 10-10-03: SAPA-Daily Dispatch: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’ 10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live: ‘Skeletons’ can be raised in public interest 10-09-30: SAPA-N24: ‘Skeletons’ can be raised in public interest 10-10-01: SAPA-IOL: Court weighs validity of TRC past 10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live: Citizen argues validity of TRC past 10-10-01: SAPA-Cape Times: Court weighs validity of TRC past 10-10-01: SAPA-Cape Argus: Court weighs validity of TRC past 10-10-01: SAPA-Pretoria news: Court weighs validity of TRC past 10-10-01: SAPA-The Mercury: Court weighs validity of TRC past 10-10-01: SAPA-Sunday Tribune: Court weighs validity of TRC past 10-10-01: SAPA-SA Star: Court weighs validity of TRC past 10-10-01: SAPA-ECR-Mobile: McBride Concourt case continues 10-10-01: SAPA-ECR-Newswatch: McBride Concourt case continues 10-10-01: Citizen: Concourt: truth versus law 10-10-01: Mail & Guardian: ‘If I see someone stealing, can I call him a thief?’ 10-10-01: Eyewitness News: McBride lawyer are playing with semantics 10-09-30: TimesLive: When is a Killer not a Killer? 10-10-01: Business Day: Court reserves McBride judgment 10-10-05: Daily Maverick: Analysis: Citizen vs McBride, to remember or not to remember 10-09-30: SAPA-City Press: McBride murderer accusation ‘unfair’ 10-09-30: SAPA-SunInd-IOL: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest1.

[C] Overview of Radical Honesty White Refugee Argument 1.

Eight parties submitted arguments to the Concourt: Six Amici, Applicant and Respondent. The Radical Honesty argument has been censored from all CCT 23-10 news reports.

2.

It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument is an intentional, malicious campaign of censorship of: [72] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-332] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [512] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-792] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Afrikaner Demographic Survival; [86-982] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

1 2

Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) Paragraph [**] of Radical Honesty (First) Amicus Curiae to Concourt in The Citizen v. Robert McBride (CCT 23-10)


[A] Publication & Date: [001]

10-09-29: SAPA-Times Live3: Citizen fights McBride in Concourt

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest4.

[C] Overview of Radical Honesty White Refugee Argument 3.

Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

4.

SAPA/SundayTimes/TimesLive/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

5.

3

a.

Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b.

On evening of 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#1885] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 08:59 PM [#238]: Att: Mr. Ray Hartley, Editor, Req. Sunday Times Position on media corruption and media censorship

c.

On 15 August at 12:396, 14:077, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:178, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d.

Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious, to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid PopulationEnvironment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article682703.ece/Citizen-fights-McBride-in-ConCourt Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 5 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 6 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 7 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 8 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 4


[A] Publication & Date: [002] 10-09-29: SAPA-N249: Court to hear McBride ruling appeal

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest10.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/News24/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a.

Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b.

On evening of 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18811] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 01:53 [# 192] Tim du Plessis (Beeld), 05:30 [#217] Bun Booysen (Die Burger), [#233] Lisa Albrecht (Rapport): Req [Publication] Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c.

On 15 August at 12:3912, 14:0713, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1714, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d.

Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious, to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee. 9

http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Court-to-hear-McBride-ruling-appeal-20100929 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 11 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 12 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 13 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 14 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 10


[A] Publication & Date: [003] 10-09-29: SAPA-Times Live15: Citizen takes McBride appeal to Concourt

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest16.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/TimesLive/SundayTimes/SANEF Argument:

editors

notified

of

the

Radical

Honesty

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18817] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 08:59 PM [#238]: Att: Mr. Ray Hartley, Editor, Req. Sunday Times Position on media corruption and media censorship c. On 15 August at 12:3918, 14:0719, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1720, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious, to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

15

http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article682446.ece/Citizen-takes-McBride-appeal-to-Concourt Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 17 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 18 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 19 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 20 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 16


[A] Publication & Date: [004] 10-09-30: SAPA-Business Report21: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest22.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/BusinessReport/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18823] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:3924, 14:0725, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1726, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

21

http://www.busrep.co.za/index.php?fSectionId=566&fArticleId=5668895 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 23 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 24 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 25 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 26 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 22


[A] Publication & Date: [005] 20-09-30: SAPA-IOL27: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest28.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/IOL/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18829] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM [#247] Cape Argus: Chris Whitfield, [248] Ind. On Saturday: Peter Bruce, [252] Cape Times: Alide Dasnois. c. On 15 August at 12:3930, 14:0731, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1732, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee. 27

http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/mcbride-murderer-label-unfair-lawyer-1.682680 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 29 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 30 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 31 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 32 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 28


[A] Publication & Date: [006] 10-09-30: SAPA-Pretoria News33: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest34.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/Pretoria News/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18835] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:21 [249] Att: Ms. Z. Mkhuma, Editor; Req: Pretoria News Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:3936, 14:0737, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1738, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee. 33

http://www.pretorianews.co.za/?fSectionId=3534&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 35 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 36 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 37 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 38 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 34


[A] Publication & Date: [007] 10-09-30: SAPA-Cape Argus39: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest40.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/Cape Argus/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18841] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM: [247] Att: … Mr. C. Whitfield, Req: …. Argus Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:3942, 14:0743, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1744, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee. 39

http://www.capeargus.co.za/?fSectionId=3571&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 41 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 42 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 43 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 44 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 40


[A] Publication & Date: [008] 10-09-30: SAPA-SA Star45: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest46.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/SA Star/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18847] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM [#246] Att: Mr. Brendan Seery, Editor; Req … Star's Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:3948, 14:0749, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1750, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee. 45

http://www.thestar.co.za/?fSectionId=3268&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 47 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 48 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 49 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 50 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 46


[A] Publication & Date: [009] 10-09-30: SAPA-Sunday Ind.51: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest52.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/Sunday Independent/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18853] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:03 [245] Att: Editor: Mr. Makhudu Sefara; Req. Sunday Ind. Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:3954, 14:0755, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1756, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee. 51

http://www.sundayindependent.co.za/?fSectionId=3536&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 53 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 54 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 55 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 56 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 52


[A] Publication & Date: [010]

10-09-30: SAPA-Daily News57: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest58.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/Daily News/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18859] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 [#251] Att: Daily News: Ed: Mr. Alan Dunn; Req: Daily News Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:3960, 14:0761, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1762, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee. 57

http://www.dailynews.co.za/?fSectionId=3532&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 59 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 60 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 61 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 62 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 58


[A] Publication & Date: [011] 10-09-30: SAPA-Cape Times63: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest64.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/Cape Times/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18865] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM [252] Att: Ms. Alide Dasnois; Req: Cape Times Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:3966, 14:0767, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1768, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee. 63

http://www.capetimes.co.za/?fSectionId=3531&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 65 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 66 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 67 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 68 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 64


[A] Publication & Date: [012] 10-09-30: SAPA-Mercury69: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest70.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/The Mercury/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18871] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:3972, 14:0773, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1774, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

69

http://www.themercury.co.za/?fSectionId=3535&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 71 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 72 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 73 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 74 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 70


[A] Publication & Date: [013]

10-09-30: SAPA-N2475: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest76.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/News 24/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18877] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 01:53 [# 192] Tim du Plessis (Beeld), 05:30 [#217] Bun Booysen (Die Burger), [#233] Lisa Albrecht (Rapport). c. On 15 August at 12:3978, 14:0779, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1780, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 e. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to

censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic

75

http://www.news24.com/printArticle.aspx?iframe&aid=88774e42-3cd1-4832-817b-053045239bb1&cid=1059 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 77 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 78 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 79 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 80 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 76


Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

[A] Publication & Date: [014]

10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live81: McBride murder accusation unfair

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest82.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/TimesLive/SundayTimes/SANEF Argument:

editors

notified

of

the

Radical

Honesty

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18883] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 08:59 PM [#238]: Att: Mr. Ray Hartley,.. Req. Sunday Times Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:3984, 14:0785, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1786, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to

censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

81

http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article683813.ece/McBride-murder-accusation-unfair Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 83 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 84 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 85 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 86 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 82


[A] Publication & Date: [015]

10-10-03: SAPA-Daily Dispatch87: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest88.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/Daily Dispatch/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18889] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 03:59 PM [#203] Att: Daily Dispatch: Ed. Mr. Andrew Trench; Req: Daily Dispatch Position on media corruption and media censorship c. On 15 August at 12:3990, 14:0791, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1792, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee. 87

http://www.dispatch.co.za/article.aspx?id=437602 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 89 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 90 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 91 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 92 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 88


[A] Publication & Date: [016]

10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live93: ‘Skeletons’ can be raised in public interest

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest94.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/TimesLive/SundayTimes/SANEF Argument:

editors

notified

of

the

Radical

Honesty

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18895] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 08:59 PM [#238]: Att: Mr. Ray Hartley, Editor, Req. Sunday Times Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:3996, 14:0797, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1798, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to

censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

93

http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article684101.ece/Skeletons-can-be-raised-in-public-interest Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 95 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 96 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 97 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 98 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 94


[A] Publication & Date: [017]

10-09-30: SAPA-N2499: ‘Skeletons’ can be raised in public interest

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest100.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/News 24/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188101] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 01:53 [# 192] Tim du Plessis (Beeld), 05:30 [#217] Bun Booysen (Die Burger), [#233] Lisa Albrecht (Rapport): Req [Publication] Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39102, 14:07103, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17104, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to

censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

99

http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Skeletons-can-be-raised-in-public-interest-20100930 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 101 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 102 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 103 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 104 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 100


[A] Publication & Date: [018]

10-10-01: SAPA-IOL (Kenrichi Serino)105: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest106.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/IOL/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188107] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM [#247] Cape Argus: Chris Whitfield, [248] Ind. On Saturday: Peter Bruce, [252] Cape Times: Alide Dasnois. c. On 15 August at 12:39108, 14:07109, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17110, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee. 105

http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/court-weighs-validity-of-trc-past-1.682742 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 107 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 108 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 109 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 110 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 106


[A] Publication & Date: [019]

10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live111: Citizen argues validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest112.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/TimesLive/SundayTimes/SANEF Argument:

editors

notified

of

the

Radical

Honesty

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188113] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 08:59 PM [#238]: Att: Mr. Ray Hartley, Editor, Req. Sunday Times Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39114, 14:07115, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17116, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to

censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

111

http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article684314.ece/Citizen-argues-validity-of-TRC-past Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 113 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 114 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 115 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 116 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 112


[A] Publication & Date: [020]

10-10-01: SAPA-Cape Times117: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest118.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/Cape Times/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188119] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM {#252] Att: Cape Times Ed: Ms. Alide Dasnois; Req: Cape Times Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39120, 14:07121, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17122, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to

censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

117

http://www.capetimes.co.za/?fSectionId=3531&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 119 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 120 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 121 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 122 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 118


[A] Publication & Date: [021]

10-10-01: SAPA-Cape Argus123: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest124.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/Cape Argus/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188125] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM [#247] Att: Cape Argus Editor: Mr. C. Whitfield, Req: Cape & Weekend Argus Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39126, 14:07127, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17128, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee. 123

http://www.capeargus.co.za/?fSectionId=3571&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 125 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 126 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 127 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 128 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 124


[A] Publication & Date: [022]

10-10-01: SAPA-Pretoria news129: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest130.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/Pretoria News/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188131] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:21 {#249] Att: Ms. Z. Mkhuma, Editor; Req: Pretoria News Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39132, 14:07133, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17134, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to

censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

129

http://www.pretorianews.co.za/?fSectionId=3534&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 131 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 132 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 133 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 134 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 130


[A] Publication & Date: [023]

10-10-01: SAPA-The Mercury135: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest136.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/The Mercury/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188137] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39138, 14:07139, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17140, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

135

http://www.themercury.co.za/?fSectionId=3535&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 137 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 138 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 139 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 140 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 136


[A] Publication & Date: [024]

10-10-01: SAPA-Sunday Tribune141: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest142.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/Sunday Tribune/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188143] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:21 AM [#250] Att: Mr. Philani Mgwaba, Editor, Req. Sunday Tribune Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39144, 14:07145, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17146, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to

censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

141

http://www.sundaytribune.co.za/?fSectionId=3537&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 143 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 144 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 145 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 146 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 142


[A] Publication & Date: [025]

10-10-01: SAPA-SA Star147: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest148.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/The Star/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188149] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM [#246] Att: Mr. Brendan Seery, Editor; Req … Star's Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39150, 14:07151, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17152, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to

censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

147

http://www.thestar.co.za/?fSectionId=3268&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 149 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 150 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 151 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 152 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 148


[A] Publication & Date: [026]

10-10-01: SAPA-ECR-Mobile153: McBride Concourt case continues

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest154.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/Eastern Cape Radio/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188155] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39156, 14:07157, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17158, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

153

http://www.ecr.co.za/kagiso/content/en/east-coast-radio/east-coast-radio-mobilenews?oid=932049&sn=Mobile+news+detail&pid=171901 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 155 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 156 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 157 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 158 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 154


[A] Publication & Date: [027]

10-10-01: SAPA-ECR-Newswatch159: McBride Concourt case continues

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest160.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/Eastern Cape Radio/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188161] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39162, 14:07163, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17164, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

159

http://www.ecr.co.za/kagiso/content/en/east-coast-radio/east-coast-radionews?oid=932049&sn=Detail&pid=490476&McBride-Concourt-case-continues Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 161 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 162 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 163 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 164 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 160


[A] Publication & Date: [028]

10-10-01: Citizen165: Concourt: truth versus law

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest166.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. Citizen/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via Citizen attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188167] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39168, 14:07169, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17170, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via Citizen attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10 3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

165

http://www.thecitizen.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=128517&catid=80:breaking-news&Itemid=132 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 167 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 168 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 169 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 170 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 166


[A] Publication & Date: [029] 10-10-01: Mail & Guardian (Faranaaz Parker)171: ‘If I see someone stealing, can I call him a thief?’

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest172.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. Mail and Guardian/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188173] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 06:36 PM: [#227] Att: Mail and Guardian Editors; Req: Mail and Guardian Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39174, 14:07175, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17176, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

171

http://www.mg.co.za/article/2010-10-01-if-i-see-someone-stealing-can-call-him-a-thief Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 173 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 174 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 175 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 176 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 172


[A] Publication & Date: [030] 10-10-01: Eyewitness News177: Stephen Grootes: McBride lawyer are playing with semantics

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest178.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. Eyewitness News/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188179] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 06:50 PM: [#229] Att: Ms. Pheladi Gwangwa, Station Manager; Req: 702 Radio Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39180, 14:07181, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17182, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

177

http://www.eyewitnessnews.co.za/articleprog.aspx?id=49757 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 179 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 180 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 181 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 182 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 178


[A] Publication & Date: [031]

10-09-30: TimesLive183: Khethme Chelemu: When is a Killer not a Killer?

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest184.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. Sunday Times/TimesLive/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188185] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 08:59 PM [#238]: Att: Mr. Ray Hartley, Editor, Req. Sunday Times Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39186, 14:07187, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17188, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

183

http://www.citypress.co.za/SouthAfrica/News/McBride-murder-accusation-unfair-20100930-2 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 185 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 186 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 187 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 188 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 184


[A] Publication & Date: [032]

10-10-01: Business Day189: Ernest Mabuza: Court reserves McBride judgment

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest190.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. Business Day/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188191] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 02:45 PM: {#202] Att: Mr. Peter Bruce, Editor: Bus Day: Req Bus. Day Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39192, 14:07193, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17194, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

189

http://www.businessday.co.za/Articles/Content.aspx?id=122504 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 191 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 192 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 193 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 194 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 190


[A] Publication & Date: [033] 10-10-05: Daily Maverick195: Stephen Grootes: Analysis: Citizen vs McBride, to remember or not to remember

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest196.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. Business Day/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188197] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 04:22 PM [#208] Att: Daily Maverick: Ed: Mr. Brkic Branko; Req: Daily Maverick's Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39198, 14:07199, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17200, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

195

http://www.thedailymaverick.co.za/article/2010-10-04-analysis-citizen-vs-mcbride-to-remember-or-not-to-remember Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 197 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 198 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 199 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 200 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 196


[A] Publication & Date: [034] 10-09-30: SAPA-City Press201: McBride murderer accusation ‘unfair’

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest202.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/City Press/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188203] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 03:42 PM [#202] Att: City Press Ed: Ms. Ferial Haffajee; Req: City Press Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39204, 14:07205, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17206, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

201

http://www.citypress.co.za/SouthAfrica/News/McBride-murder-accusation-unfair-20100930-2 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 203 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 204 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 205 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 206 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 202


[A] Publication & Date: [035] 10-09-30: SAPA-SunInd-IOL207: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2 1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest208.

[C] Overview of Argument 1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1] Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 2310 news reports. 2. SAPA/Sunday Independent/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument: a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic. b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188209] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:03 [245] Att: Editor: Mr. Makhudu Sefara; Req. Sunday Ind. Position on media corruption and media censorship. c. On 15 August at 12:39210, 14:07211, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17212, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

207

http://www.sundayindependent.co.za/?fSectionId=3536&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71) 209 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ] 210 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12 211 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12 212 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12 208

10-10-06: Radical Honesty [35 Ecolaw Summ] Complaint to Press Council Ombudsman  

10-10-06: Radical Honesty [35 Ecolaw Summ] Complaint to Press Council Ombudsman

Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you