Page 1


case report

Unusual Dens Evaginatus on Maxillary Premolars: A Case Report M. Priya, BDS J. Jeevarathan, MDS M.S. Muthu, MDS, PhD V. Rathnaprabhu, MDS ABSTRACT Dens evaginatus is a developmental anomaly that can be defined as a tubercle from the surface of an affected tooth. It is composed of enamel and dentin usually enclosing pulp tissue. It is a rare dental anomaly commonly seen on premolars. A 12-yearold boy reported for the management of dental caries. He had bilateral occurrence of dens evaginatus on maxillary second premolars. The tubercle on the right side was unusually long without occlusal interference with the opposing primary mandibular second molar. Carious teeth were restored and the tubercle was left untreated. Management of dens evaginatus is determined by various factors which are discussed in decision-support system. Pulpal complication due to caries or fracture of tubercle can occur; hence it should be periodically monitored. (J Dent Child 2011;78:71-5) Received October 11, 2009; Last Revision January 1, 2010; Revision Accepted January 2, 2010. Keywords: dens evaginatus, maxillary premolar, classification


ens evaginatus is an anomaly of odontogenesis in which a tubercle composed of enamel, dentin, and usually enclosing pulp tissue is produced on the crown’s occlusal surface.1-6 The exact etiology of dens evaginatus (DE) is not clear, but several investigators have reported the occurrence in siblings, suggesting a familial or hereditary pattern.6-8 DE is a result of abnormal proliferation of the inner enamel epithelium into the stellate reticulum of the enamel organ during the morphodifferentiation stage of tooth development.3,4,9,10 It is most commonly seen in premolars, 1-6 and it occurs 5 times more frequently in the mandible than in the maxilla.11 Merrill and Curzon et al., however, have reported many cases of DE in Dr. Priya is tutor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College & Hospital, Maduravoyal, Tamil Nadu, India Dr. Jeevarathan is a reader, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Sree Balaji Dental College & Hospital, Narayanapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, Dr. Muthu is professor & head, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College & Hospital, Velappanchavadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, and Dr. Prabhu is professor and Head, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College & Hospital, Maduravoyal, Tamil Nadu, India. Correspond with Dr. Jeevarathan at Journal of Dentistry for Children-78:1, 2011

maxillary premolars. 6,12 DE varies with race and is more commonly seen among Mongoloids, 11,13 Chinese, Thai, and Caucasians,13 and the prevalence varies from approximately 1% to 4%.2,6,12,14-17 In Malaysia and Singapore, it is referred to as Leong’s premolar—named after M.O. Leong in 1946, who first drew attention to this anomaly at a meeting of the Malayan Dental Association. 18 Leong did not realize that the premolars were not the only teeth affected, but that the anomaly has been observed in molars, 14 canines, and incisors. 3 DE in the anterior teeth is referred to as talon cusp, as it resembles an eagle’s talon.19 Uyeno and Lugo,20 however, proposed that DE and talon cusp are the same dental anomaly. Other terms used interchangeably with DE include: tuberculated cusp; accessory tubercle; occlusal tuber-culated premolar; evaginatus odontoma; occlusal pearl11; interstitial cusp2; odontome of the axial core type3; and central cusp.21 DE is often bilateral,3 but even multiple evaginated teeth involving as many as 8 teeth are reported in the literature.2,3,5,6,9,12,22-24 The other dental anomalies that can occur concurrently with DE are mesiodens,2 dens invaginatus, 2,4 gemination, 4 macrodontia, multiple

Unusual dens evaginatus on maxillary premolars

Priya et al


unerupted teeth, 25 and supernumerary mandibular premolar.26,27 The common problems associated with the evaginated tooth are occlusal interferences, caries around the fissure, and attrition of the opposing tooth. DE also has been reported to cause incomplete eruption, displacement of teeth, and traumatic occlusion because of the size and location of the tubercle.24 Rotation and tilting of teeth with DE also can occur as a sequelae of traumatic occlusion.4-6,9 Oehlers reported that abnormal occlusal forces on the crown can produce subluxation, leading to dilaceration of the root at the apical one third level.4 The end result of an evaginated tooth is pulpal infection, either by direct exposure due to cusp fracture or indirectly through patent dentinal tubules exposed due to wearing and attrition of the tubercle.4,6,24 Yip reported that 82% and approximately 26% of 57 premolars exhibited cuspal wear and pulpal involvement, respectively. 2 The possible sequelae following pulpal exposure are apical periodontitis, loss of vitality, facial infection, osteomyelitis,2,22,28 root cyst, and pericementitis.26 The prevalence of these complications was studied by many authors, who found that periapical abscess varied from 18% to 40%.4,14,29 The purpose of this article was to report a case of an unusually long and slender dens evaginatus in a maxillary right second premolar which did not interfere with the occlusion.

dibular right and left first molars. The maxillary right second premolar’s occlusal surface featured a prominent, rounded, very long projection from the central groove (Figure 1), and on the contralateral tooth there was a very mild elevation (Figure 2). There was no obvious sign of wear or fracture in the tubercle. An intraoral periapical radiograph of the maxillary right second premolar revealed the following features: a projection on the occlusal aspect; pulpal extension into the projection; complete root formation without any periapical pathology (Figure 3). The periapical radiograph of the maxillary left second premolar was unremarkable (Figure 4). Mandibular and maxillary impressions were made using alginate (ZelganŽ 2002, Dentsply, Gurgaon, Haryana, , India), and study models were prepared. Since the tubercle was extra long, a K file (Mani Inc, Tochigi, Japan) was used to measure its length (Figure 5) and was read on an endobloc (Dentsply, Maillefer, Swiss; Figure 6). The tubercle measured approximately 3 mm from the central fissure. Oral prophylaxis was administered and preventive resin restorations (A2 shade, Filtek Z 350, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minn) were performed on the permanent mandibular right and left first molars. As there was no


A 12-year-old male reported to the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Maduravoyal, Tamil Nadu, India, with a chief complaint of decay in his tooth. The medical and past dental histories were noncontributory. On clinical examination, the patient was in the late mixed dentition period. The mandibular right and left second molars were the only primary teeth in the dentition. Dental caries was found in the permanent man-

Figure 1. Intraoral photograph showing the unusually long dens evaginatus from the maxillary right second premolar.

72 Priya et al

Figure 2. Occlusal view of maxillary teeth with dens evaginatus on both second premolars (mirror view).

Figure 3. Intraoral periapical radiograph showing pulpal extension into dens evaginatus on the maxillary right second premolar.

Unusual dens evaginatus on maxillary premolars

Journal of Dentistry for Children-78:1, 2011

Figure 4. Intraoral periapical radiograph of the maxillary left second premolar.

occlusal discrepancy or interference of the tubercle, no specific treatment for the DE was administered. Preventive measures, however, as elaborated in the decisionsupport system (Figure 7), were planned and explained to the parents. The parents were not willing to engage in any preventive management of the sound tooth even after it was explained that the tubercle may experience future complications.


DE is also known as tuberculum anomalous, which is a developmental anomaly described as an enamel elevation similar to talon cusp, generally located in the main grooves of molars and premolars.28,30 The teeth commonly involved are mandibular premolars,1-6,9,23,25,31 but in our case it was seen bilaterally on the maxillary second premolar in varying clinical presentations. A complete search of the scientific literature did not reveal any classification for DE. Hence, we suggest the following classification in line with modified talons cusp classification, which was proposed by Jeevarathan et al., in 2005.32 1. Major DE—a cusp-like projection from a posterior tooth’s occlusal surface extending more than 2 mm from the central fissure/pit; 2. Minor DE—a cusp-like projection from a posterior tooth’s occlusal surface extending more than 1 mm but less than 2 mm from the central fissure/pit; and 3. Trace DE—a small elevation from a posterior tooth’s occlusal surface extending less than 1 mm from the central fissure/pit. In our case, the DE in the maxillary right second premolar is considered a major DE, whereas on the contralateral side it is considered a trace DE. The previously published reports had not measured the tubercle’s size. The proposed classification will be helpful in categorizing future DE reports. The authors initially considered the tip of a functional/nonfunctional cusp from the central fissures/pits of posterior teeth as a reference point   Journal of Dentistry for Children-78:1, 2011

Figure 5. Measuring the length of dens evaginatus using a K file.

to classify DE similar to the cementoenamel junction and incisal edge in talon cusp classification. Due to the possibility of morphological variations of cuspal patterns, however, the functional or non functional cusps could not be considered. The most common problem in an evaginated tooth is occlusal interference when the tooth comes into contact with the opposing tooth. In our case, even though the tubercle on the maxillary right second premolar was unusually long, it did not interfere with the opposing tooth in occlusion or with the lateral excursion of the jaws (Figure 8). This could be due to the presence of the primary mandibular second molar, which is not the perfect antagonist to the maxillary second premolar. The patient and his parents were informed about potential problems with the eruption of the opposing premolar, and the need for regular monitoring was emphasized. If there is no occlusal interference, preventive measures based on depth of the fissures around the tubercle should be considered. When the fissures around the tubercle are not deep, application of fluoride can be done. If the fissures are deep, application of sealants is the treatment of choice to prevent caries and to

Figure 6. Tubercle length being read on an endobloc.

Unusual dens evaginatus on maxillary premolars

Priya et al


Figure 7. A decision support system for the management of dens evaginatus.

reinforce the tubercle from fracture. 21,33-35 If there is occlusal interference, then management of DE is determined by the pulp horn extension within it. The pulp extension in an evaginated tooth could be wide, narrow, constricted pulpally, isolated, or even absent.11,13,24 In our case, the pulp horn extension in the maxillary right second premolar was wide, whereas on the contralateral side it was absent. When the pulp horn does not extend into the tubercle, grinding of the tubercle followed by composite restoration is the treatment of choice. If the pulp horn extends into the tubercle, then its height of penetration determines the treatment. When there is mild extension of the pulp, intermittent grinding of the cusp is advised to allow the repa-

Figure 8. Lack of Occlusal interference in lateral excursion.

74 Priya et al

rative dentin formation followed by fluoride application to diminish sensitivity. 17,36,37 If there is accidental exposure of the pulp, direct pulp capping is recommended to maintain vitality. When there is severe extension of the pulp, complete removal of the tubercle with the necessary pulpal procedures based on vitality and status of root development is the treatment option for DE. Extraction is the treatment of choice when any orthodontic treatment is necessary for the patient, which demands removal of the premolar.31


1. Tratman EK. An unrecorded form of the simplest type of the dilated composite odontome. Br Dent J 1949;86:271-5. 2. Yip WK. The prevalence of dens evaginatus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;38:80-7. 3. Lau TC. Odontomes of the axial core type. Br Dent J 1955;99:219-25. 4. Oehlers FAC. The tuberculated premolar. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1956;6:144-8. 5. Yong SL. Prophylactic treatment of dens evaginatus. J Dent Child 1974;41:289-92. 6. Merrill RG. Occlusal anomalous tubercles on premolars of Alaskan Eskimos and Indians. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1964;17:484-96. 7. Palmer ME. Case reports of evaginated odontomes in Caucasians. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973;35:772-9.

Unusual dens evaginatus on maxillary premolars

Journal of Dentistry for Children-78:1, 2011

8. Priddy WL, Carter HG, Auzins J. Dens evaginatus: An anomaly of clinical significance. J Endod 1976;2:51-2. 9. Senia ES, Regezi JA. Dens evaginatus in the etiology of bilateral periapical pathologic involvement in caries-free premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;38:465-8. 10. Villa VG, Bunag CA, Ramos AB. A developmental anomaly in the form of an occlusal tubercle with central canal which serves as the pathway of infections to the pulp and periapical region. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1959;12:343-8. 11. Echeverri EA, Wang MM, Chavaria C, Taylor DL. Multiple dens evaginatus: Diagnosis, management, and complications: Case report. Pediatr Dent 1994; 16:314-7. 12. Curzon MEJ, Curzon JA, Poyton HG. Evaginated odontomes in the Keewatin Eskimos. Br Dent J 1970;129:324-8. 13. Hill FJ, Bellis WJ. Dens evaginatus and its management. Br Dent J 1984;156:400-2. 14. Reichart P, Tantiniran D. Dens evaginatus in the Thai: An evaluation of 51 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1975;39:615-21. 15. Lin LC, Roan RT. Incidence of dens evaginatus investigated from three junior middle schools at Kaohsiung City. Formosan Sci 1980;34:113-21. 16. Bedi R, Pitts NB. Dens evaginatus in the Hong Kong Chinese population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988;4:104-7. 17. TPC. Management of dens evaginatus: Evaluation of two prophylactic treatment methods. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12:137-40. 18. Talib R. Dens evaginatus in the aetiology of periapical pathology and its management. Malays Dent J 1993;14:22-4. 19. Mellor JK, Ripa LW. Talon cusp: A clinical significant anomaly. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio Endod 1970;29:225-8. 20. Uyeno DS, Lugo A. Dens evaginatus: A review. J Dent Child 1996;63:328-32. 21. Kawata T, Tanne K. Early detection of dens evaginatus appearing on the premolars and clinical management: Histological study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002;26:199-201. 22. Allwright WC. Odontomes of the axial core type as a cause of osteomyelitis in the mandible. Br Dent J 1958;104:363-5.

  Journal of Dentistry for Children-78:1, 2011

23. Sykaris SN. Occlusal anomalous tubercle on premolars of a Greek girl. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;38:88-91. 24. Oehlers FAC, Lee KW, Lee EC. Dens evaginatus (evaginated odontome): Its structure and responses to external stimuli. Dent Prac Dent Rec 1967;17: 239-44. 25. Ekman-Westborg B, Julin P. Multiple anomalies in dental morphology: Macrodontia, multituberculism, central cusps, and pulp invaginations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;38:217-22. 26. Geist JM, Mich D. Dens evaginatus: Case report and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;67:628-31. 27. Shiu-yin Cho. Supernumerary premolars associated with dens evaginatus: Report of two cases. J Can Dent Assoc 2005;71:390-3. 28. Ju Y. Dens evaginatus: A difficult diagnostic problem? J Clin Pediatr Dent 1991;15:247-8. 29. Goto T, Kawahara K, Kondo T, Imai K, Kishi K, Fujiki Y. Clinical and radiographic study of dens evaginatus. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1979;8:78-83. 30. Ngeow WC, Chai WL. Dens evaginatus on a wisdom tooth: A diagnostic dilemma—Case report. Aust Dent J 1998;43:328-30. 31. Cho SY. Dental abscess in a tooth with intact dens evaginatus. Int J Pediatr Dent 2006;16:135-8. 32. Jeevarathan J, Deepthi A, Muthu MS, Sivakumar N, Soujanya K. Labial and lingual talon cusps of a primary lateral incisor: A case report. Pediatr Dent 2005;27:303-6. 33. Bazan MT, Dawson LR. Protection of dens evaginatus with pit and fissure sealant. J Dent Child 1983;50:361-3. 34. Augsberger RA, Wong T. Pulp management in dens evaginatus. J Endod 1996;22:323-6. 35. Huang TJ, Roan RT. Clinical study of dens evaginatus cases with pulpal involvement. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 1997;13:440-7. 36. Pecora JD, Vansan LP, Saquy PC, Souza Neto MD. Dens evaginatus in inferior premolars. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent 1991;45:535-6. 37. Wong MT, Augsburger RA. Management of dens evaginatus. Gen Dent 1992;40:300-3.

Unusual dens evaginatus on maxillary premolars

Priya et al


Copyright of Journal of Dentistry for Children is the property of American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Unusual Dens Evaginatus on Maxillary Premolars:A Case Report  

Unusual Dens Evaginatus on Maxillary Premolars: A Case Report

Unusual Dens Evaginatus on Maxillary Premolars:A Case Report  

Unusual Dens Evaginatus on Maxillary Premolars: A Case Report