Issuu on Google+

ภ    ภ ( ภ)  ภ      

  ภ ภ ! "#  $ภ%& '&( ภ#)' " *#" ! *  $*#$! +! ,"" - !

 ภ".  ".ภ&*$ภ%&*#$ภ%&! !"*/ +! ภ) (0  //'   1 "2ภ ! *0ภ'#3& /" 0 *0".ภ& !0 ภ-ภ%4# !ภ"#$% &'     5 ภ #  (Johnstone, 1981) 1. 

"*0"" -ภ!ภ"'!  ". !-ภ%   ภ0 1 

 !)*0*#0 " -"*0"" - !Dภ0  )E ภภ0  E /),0 Dภ0  )      2. 

$ภ%& !ภ  E/ภ ! /ภ

ภ'#/ภภ$1  ! "2ภ(0#0ภ! *0.( "'!  ". !0 ภ-ภ%  /*0"" ( "'!  ". !0 ภ-ภ% #0# $ภ%& !G//   " ( D ภ 3. 

/0 ภ)#,'& 

0 "# ". !-ภ%, $(  '&  *ภ$ ( 

/0 ) ภภ&I !ภ)#E0 # *ภ"0 

 /0 ภภ)#$ภ&I( 

   #/ 4. 

/, ! /  & /3#$    $1 ! $$!E  

ภ "$!$ E#0 5. 

, K*ภL M%N (#    % & 3&"' !")#  (-'' ภ/", 2544) 1.  (validity) 

 !#/0 

E#03&$ภ%& !0 ภ#E#0   Dภ0  ) +!

$ภ%&")#  1.1  # (relevant) 

0 #E#0 # ! 4 "2 ภ!(0 4# ภ3&$ภ%& !3

#   GPA *0,

 $"M 2'Y  ภ4# !E 1.2 ,  (representative) 

/0 , 3&$ภ%& !3

#  3 !$ $3 ภ !")( 3&$ภ%& !3

#   0   3&.D'  ภ, 

".ภE(0( D0[ 2.  ! (reliability) 

 !#/0 

3&$ภ%& !3

#E#0    !   "0   

E#0 !! )ภ#+)*  $#ภ +! $ภ%&")# 


2.1 , (objectivity) 

0 #E#0   , ภ#"'*/ภ!ภ  ( 

( D ภ". !, D  3&"'( "'! ภภ  !/( D ภD0"ภ '" 2.2 $#$! !) (minimum Error) 

0 #E#0   $#$! !)   !E#0/0 /ภ$

(0 D$ ! !  3. ,ภ$ (neutrality) 

 !#/0 

#0,ภ$ -/ภ$)  (bias) E 40  (0b[*#b[! E )4#ภ0ภ

G$ภ%&")/ $0$ E 3'2 4. E (sensitivity) 

 !#/0 E 3&$ภ%& !3

# ""#    ภ     'E#0   #/ 4#

/0 $ # ! $ #  5. "#ภ*ภ)E*0 (practicality) 

 !#/0 "#ภ*ภ)E*0 +! $ภ%&")#  5.1 ภ(0 D$

 (availability) 

 !#/0 ")E*0# ภ(0 D$E#0"#ภ"ภ(0 D$/ภภ/  #  " ภE#0

 5.2 $

 (interpretability) 

 !#*0 ภ# !/3#"D "3#$!)"3# (0*/

$""0 ภ&I#"'3&.E#0

  ภ/ภ "3' "' 2'YK"'23, 2539 E#0ภ$  3&"'( 

 !#E0 1. ,ภ$ (Neutrality)  E $)  ( 

 ภ     

 $'. ( 

 (labor productivity) +! ##0 "   E#0  *0/ 

 ! )

E*0*    . $'$. 'ภ / )*0(#,ภ$ ภd'' . 'ภ 0 *03$ภ/)ภ" ภd'' . ภ $'*0! /ภภ$ภภ 

 2. ,3'" (Objectivity)  ภ#"'ภ!ภ ( 

'E#0ภ'#/ภภ'#   ( D0'/  ( D ภ". !, D  ,D2 3. E ภ  (Sensitivity)  "( 

 !/#ภ 

   'E#0   Dภ0

4.  ( #  

 !E#0  E#0   "#ภ(Meaningfulness & Interpretability) ภ$   ( #/3#"D "3#$!)"3# !

 (0*/     D   0 

10    0  100  ( 

 !E#0/ภภ# ภD ! 60 /E#0 "D ภ  G$! (50) 

$ภ0   ภ ( #$

E  "D "3# ( !)"3#) !     # ภ$0E#0 50  120 ภE   50  120  /E#0   E 5. Dภ0 * ( 

 !)*0 (Content Validity) *ภ-ภ% L

 /0 -ภ%*0 #  *! !-ภ%1  E 

 !#0 Dภ0 *  !0 ภ #


6. Dภ0 *ภL

 (Development Validity) ภL

  ภ)  $1 ภ E  /)ภภ D&ภ Dภ0 *ภL/ ( D ภ" '"D/E#0*' M%N" #$0 ภ' /ภ% !ภN   ภ   (0 D$' /ภ%    "'' !" ,!  #  ภ ภภ#)' $ $ภd'' (     ,E.ภ'/$3"  ! E0ภ0  E ,ภ*0(0 D$") D0'! "' 2'.*ภภ#"'*/ $ภ #ภ&! ภ  * 

% %   ภ    !") ภ)E*0  5 ภ #  (Spee and Bormans, 1992, ; Veld and Spee, 1990 and Sizer et al., 1992 0  * McDaniel, 1996)  1. ภ'#.ภ'/ (Monitoring) ! *0ภภ#"'*/.* ภ 2. ภ' $ (Evaluation) ภ#)'  $33"  ! E0ภ0  *# 3. ภ, "  (Dialogue) !  3& *ภ'# "! "*0,E    "#

*0 ภ#)'.ภ'/( ภ !, D

4. ภ,3 $ (Rationalisation) !   ภภ  ( ภ 5. ภ/#" ภ (Resource Allocation) *0,E    3 $ /ภ  !ภ$  /E#0 

ภ#)'  ภ  /ภ

2#4# !E 4#G   '! ภ  *3&$ภ%& E 1. "ภ)#/3# 0 ' !#/ (Point of Reference) /3# 0 ' * ! " , ภ&I   #K")ภ'' $#"'3& ( ภd''ภ (Borden and Bottrill, 1994) +! Davies (1993) 

$

( /3# 0 ' ")

ภ#)'  !,EE#0E0 4 ภ  1. D (

Gภ'/ (specific competitors) 2. '#  M%N  #K (theoretical ideal or norms) 3. u( K (stated goals) $ 4. ภ#)' * # !  (past performance) 2. $ภ%&' "2 (Relativity) 

ภ#)' E   !   ( D ภภ $!$ ( $$' ,") (Borden and Bottrill, 1994) 3. "*ภ (0 D$ (Data Reduction) 

ภ#)' Dภ/#*0 D *D !

  ภ)E*04 #0ภ$#+)+0 ( (0 D$ ,ภ/#(0 D$   "3 (Laurillard, 1980 ; Frackman, 1987 0  * Borden and Bottrill, 1994) )*0 ภ")E*0'#   $ #"'*/ ภ#)' ( ภE#0 4. $ภ$( #ภ' (Multi-Level of Analysis) 

ภ#)' " )E*0E#0ภ 3ภ# E  /, ภ# - *   


(# % &    ภ  

ภ#)'  !/*0"" - !# /ภภ&Iภ#$ ภ

 !"  ,ภ$ ( 

 (Neutrality) ภ" 0 . !"#3$ (Balanced perspectives) ,3'" ( 

 (Objectivity) E ภ  ( 

 (Sensitivity)  ( 

 !E#0  E#0   "#ภ(Meaningfulness & Interpretability) Dภ0 * ( 

 ! )*0*ภ' $ภd''  (Content Validity) "   ' $Dภ0 *ภ "0 

 (Technical Adequacy and Construct Validity) K !"*ภ  (Appropriate Standard for Comparison)  )/   4 (Policy Leverage)  " #$0  ภ#)'.ภ'/( ภ (Relevance to institutional mission statements) $" *ภ"# (0 D$  $ (Time Series) ("3' "' 2'YK"'23, 2539) /ภ3&"' !#( 

ภ#)' $  ")3ภ*04*ภ/# ภ-ภ%E#0  1. *0,(0 D$""3ภ  ( K$ $   & ! /#$)#ภ/#"

& ภ(4 ภ"  ภ-ภ%$3&.ภ-ภ% 2. *0,  *ภ/#" ภ !" ! )ภ0}  ภ-ภ% 4#, !  *ภ/" 3&. "' 2'.( ภ#)' .* ภ*#0  1 ! ภ'/& *0ภ""3 ภ1 E#0   Dภ0

3.  $#+)+0 *!   1 #0ภ)"3, ! E( !#/ ภ&I # ภ# !   !/ )*0ภ#)' $3u3"  4.  " 0 *0.( ภ$!$ ! $ภ /ภ. ภ *"  !,} 

-%Kภ'/$"    "' 2'.*ภ'#ภ/#ภ-ภ% "#)'ภ! ภ0E(}   1 $    E )*+

ภ  ภ  '!/ภ ภ-ภ%(    -   "K 'ภ  ภM% E#0ภL

ภ#)'    0~ 1970 ! /ภภ 'ภ}ภDภ# 

&#0ภ-ภ% ,3*00 ภ#((# # *0/  $0 '!ภ/"  ภ ) ( "ภ-ภ% ! *0"/#" & !Dภ/)ภ#$ *0ภ"  1E#0    "' 2'.$30 "D "3# / )*0ภ'#'# !/'! . '#   "/" E#0 (accountability)€ ( "ภ-ภ% #0ภ $ภ#*0ภL

ภ#)'    /' / / , ! $ }//3 ( '  , 2539) 4#   3 D* 3 #  1. D input / Process / Output-Outcome Model ,D !'*0ภภ!"3#*ภ /" ภ#)'   ภ-ภ%4#G*"K 'ภ 3 $( D  ภภ $' , $ $' 0 !Dภ#, D$ '! (Value added)€ 4#

 D 3 . !*0ภ!"3# E#0ŕ¸


1) /), 3&"'$#"( ภ-ภ% !(0-ภ% 2)  *0/  ภ-ภ%, #ภ -ภ%$.D'$ , D( 4 "0 ภ $' (  ภ ภ$ภ"D), 4 "0 !, D ( " (  (#0  /) /) $M'ภภ-ภ% (   ภ D , "('$ ภ‚$‚) $ 3) /), 3&$ภ%&$#"( ภ-ภ% (ภ  $3& ( ภ-ภ% !(0) ( Ewell and Jones, 1994) 4#ภ    input / Process / Output Indicators #  * input Indicators ,

ภ!ภ ภ$ภ*0 *' '& (   ' /" ! $ 3ภ&  1)  3$ !(0 D * ภ#0 * Process Indicators ,

 !ภ!(0 ภภ*0 ภ  4/ภ}//)(0$ภ d''ภ( ภ ,'  ภ'ภ$0 ภ#*' 3&. * Output Indicators ,

ภ!ภ $"M 2'Y( ภ , $ !ภ'#(  $ภ*0 *' '& +!   /ภOutcome  !( ( !$ภ  *0 $ภ ' 3&.ภภ #0 2. D Quality Definition Model ,D ! Ewell and Jones (1994) E#0" 

ภ#)' D)' 3&. *$ภ%&#  E 2.1 ! "  ภ/# # ภ (transcendent) 4#*0")ภ ภ !E#0")/  ภ-ภ%"D "3# ' ภ$  3&. !0 ภภภ ภ#)'  2.2 "2  Input $ Output (cost / benefit quality) 

'0 ภ   $( ภ) Input (0"D ภภ ภ ภ*$ภ%&( Output 4#3

!/*0 (

ภ#3&.$"' 2'.*ภ#)'ภ 2.3 " #$0 ภK( K (process quality) 

' 03&.(

ภภ ,

 !0 ภภ ' K( ภ 2.4 3&"'( D0")/ภ-ภ% !#E#0 (product quality) 

' ,

 !3

# ".  ภ-ภ%4# !E 2.5  */( /0 (user † based quality) ,ภL

! '3&.4##D/ภ  */( D0'4. $ $'  ภ-ภ% ,") 3. D Comprehensive Indicator System Model 

/ภD/# )! '#ภ#)'   ภ-ภ% !0ภ*0E#0+! (0 D$ !,"" -")1 0 ภ( 3ภb[ !ภ!(0 4#*0")ภ(0 D$ !3&."D

"'# $)E*0ภภ#"'*/ /# )4E#0  *0")ภ3&  $u( ภ-ภ%( ',$ภ$3

0

 !*0"" -! ภ    ภE#0 /ภD( ภ3ภ*0

ภ#)'  *ภ/#ภ-ภ%# ภ$ $0/ *

ภ-ภ%( E '*0D input / Process / Output Model ! /ภ" #$0 ภ' ( ภ/#


ภ-ภ%( E  ,D !") ภ#)' *ภ$ภ#)' #/ ภ D !1 /'/& }//)(0 (Input) ภภ (Process) $}// $ $' (Output)  E   }//)(0 E#0ภภ ภ ' ".#$0  }//ภ 3 ,0 ภภE#0ภภภ'/#ภ ภภภ"  ภภ'/ ภภ *0'ภ  'ภ ,0 }// $ $' E#0ภ'&$3&.( D0/ภ-ภ% - 2(

 ,0 ( 3 3 /, 2541)

 ภ" 0 '

"3' "' 2'YK"'23. (2539). 

ภd''  !"")ภ/"  $ภd''

4 ภ$  .  ภ ภ. ~ ! 19 G ! 6 ("'  † ภ 2539). -'' ภ/". (2546). ภ   ภ  ภ!ภ ภ. ภ3   : "3-" ~ ! 31 G 3 .. † '.. 46. -'' ภ/". (2545). !#$ภ%&'. ภ3   : ")ภ'/3ˆ$ ภ&' $. 3 3 /. (2541). ภ%ภ% ' ภ '&ภ)*!'+!  . ภ3  ‚ . (.. .) Johnstone, J.N. (1981). Indicators of Education Systems. London : Unesco.


    ก   ,ก-.ก*$ ก+ก (!ก% ก,/ก" 0(*$ 1 ! 3$ก  ก-ก% *0D0 ก%$/' !# ก'4 ก $ ")E*0d'' E#0   "' 2'. ก!( *2 3$ก  ก-ก% ! )0 !'4 ก.*    ก-ก% 1. ก + ก ก% ก  

! ก# K(

'4 ก ! *0 D0 (0ก  "'4 ก E#0   "' 2'.

  

! *0 D0 (0ก  1. D0*$กก 2.  ก%*ก 3. 3& ( ก '4 ก$ '4 ก$ '4 ก ก( ก ( ก ' ' Í *0' ก !, D0  3&3L' $!*ก'4 ก Í /# 3ก~*  2548-2550 ~$ 4 3 1 $ 50  D0(0ก  D0(0ก E#0 D0(0ก  D0ก!กก b‹กd''ก$  */, ,  '4 ก'!( "(  $") /ก#'   ") ก'4 ก ( ก' $'!(/ก#'   E#0K 4 ก*  b‹ก d' 'ก$ #/ ")$'!/ก )E*04E#0 #'   0  15% 3ก !ก/# 4 ก


2. 6  ก ก #0 4 (0  1.   $(4 ก  2. ก#)' $'#ก)ก4 ก 2.1 ก'/กก  - . M%N 3  (' ก + "! ) - .d'' 2  (b‹ก# + ก'/กก$3 ) - #" D0 ก -$ กb‹ก  2.2 ก'#ก)ก4 ก - ก0}$""3 ก  ก  - '# $กd'' .$ ก  3. ก'4 กb‹ก  4. ก  $ก'  ก*$ ก78ก  1. '4 ก*0ก'#D0$(0*/ก!ก4 ก 2. ก)#3" ( ก' 3. ก)#'2ก' - 3 (

)   ก/#$!  ")ก(0 D$ - ก)#ก&I !*0")ก#"' 4. ก(0 D$ "0 !  , /" !  ก )*0ก(0 D$ 5. '(0 D$$#"'3& ก&I( 3"  6. /# )  $ก'" D0ก!(0

3. กก  ก*$:!  ก  6 Logical Framework ( Worksheet 1-2 )


Log † Frame (Worksheet I ) ภ "# ภ' "2 $3uE#0 !ภ)#

Hiragical Objective

KPI

(3" )

(

")/)

Means of verification or method

Assumption on decision ( ! E()

('2ภ/" ,ภ(0 D$)

1. Goal

2. Purpose (Objective)

3. Output

4. Input - Activity - Resonances

"0 KPI *0" #$0 ,$

(0 D$ '2 ภ3"  $ (0 D$ KPI #

"'! !/ )*04 ภ "")/ 3"


Log † Frame (Worksheet II) 4 ภ"0 -ภ.#0ภ'4 ภภ3$ภ  ภ-ภ%

Hiragical Objective 1. Goal 3$ภ  ภ-ภ% -ภ.*ภ' 4 ภ 2. Purpose /# ภ' 4 ภ

KPI

Mov / Method

Assumption on decision ,4(

  

*0  * ภ  100%

3. Output E#03$ภ !D0 $"*ภ '4 ภ

*0' ภ# 

4. Input Activity ภ'/ภภb‹ภ - Resources $ภ"D, ',$

D0(0 "  * 3ภภ'/ภ

*  KPI !ภ)# ! *04*ภ' $4 ภ


ก!(  1. ก)#4 ก  ! 4 ก /),*ก )4 ก 2. 3"  3. ก$3 u 4. ก'/ก4# 5. "0 

")/ *0 Log Frame ! *0*ก'4 ก !/# )


kpi